Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOA:86-22_Tom Melberg_101 Little Texas LnCover Sheet Case #: Applicant Name: Address: Parcel #: Case Name: .. 4-1 5-DATE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT .. 19 3 CASE# APPLICANT 4 0 wc Y\Ae l\04.v· 1 OWNER 71,p.- YX» i\,32,01 ADDRESS /00 E. Ebl A { Al SluIE 1 fox- ADDRESS fi>Al/kE. LOCATION OF PROPERTY 401 4 Lit-€- Te-A Xi EmpbKL oli L-(7,0 this Case No. The Board may return this· application if it does not contain all the facts in question. Applicant's·description of proposed variance showing justification:6dKAL Tk'UU- St#2)4'<64,0- 2,2 L /PLA-- c.trd40 9/66£·04=9/ cukk/Lu. 0#5*Milic0- 411 ---#JL #abk£-t2 41£6 12) i -tt L «- 1* B #cr-,4 -47&./7LE,2, 3 --*'« »04*- Applicant Signature/Obt Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Building Inspector tr,forward this application to the Board of Adjustment and reason for not granting a buiding permit: -TAL_ app\av,A \3 G.,1-(u< S-v,5 04*l-0.p..,U.5 *ek bogk 5,&-c,4 3 3-j»4 90,42 & -5 4-4 €1©16 , -ZoM,iwq AF-1 - rs.it batit . 1-,Le El \00 ,- j -skite 30 1·Ju-0.i, 36-T ki »a.*te, ©Ck,te ·660#5 -¥Aol A Akie ad&<Aov) CE UNOU...4& Ck,o *20-46*SE--, Ujeu-\,4 \Q 1 Nuth h40€. .16 -'-< 'C[.r,8414 9Qkel j /3 fljjkkk sia.6,· Building InspectoFJ,t,i,,,l.le ,6 . Date Permit rejected:Board decision Application filed Date Mailed Secretary Board of Adjustment non""9U i, Li, •-, HL 1 .. 73=a j-n n L w: 8779 Bill Lukes moved that the following be adopted: BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION NO.86-22 Tom Melberg, Lot 4, Little Texas S/D WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substan- tial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant's request for a 13' frontyard setback variance, a 13' sideyard setback variance to the north and a 10' sideyard setback variance to the south for a residential addition. Additional conditions or restrictions: WARNING:Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. Joe Zanin second the adoption of the foregoing Resolution.The roll having been called, the vote was as follows: Evan Gull - yes Bob Throm - yes Joe Zanin - yes Kandi Shaffran - yes Bill Lukes - yes The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED:September 30, 1986 The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado Atteft: -56 4«134.-l-9 LLaM Secreta'ry har'Ne Chairman CO C C(J: .. ./34 4 <4 -Ak- -.4 .7'4*,r»> Nt// 39 0/mog?-66 elb U #6 41 JJE 171.-3 .71 76 20/ Ibid.U-oro_d rK{AOA)-1-f 7230 --El*k 4/77£2- u /4 / 77 -79)11 _)10 0 22 9 L L.1->COD Be /5-31 0 0 1:) 6 I 2-jpl>L f .... U 0,»d«A_ «er,» t,nn n.,1 9Ul,UUUJ .., 8779 ASPEN/PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT 506 E. MAIN ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-5973 00136 -61210 BLDG. PERMIT -61212 PLBG. PERMIT -61215 ELECT.PERMIT -61214 MECH. PERMIT -63311 BLDG. PERMIT REVIEW -61220 REINSPECTION -63004 CODE BOOKS -63313 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT .0 5. ec - 61002 CONTRACTORS LICENSE -61120 MOBILE HOME -63316 PLAN CHECK NAME:LI -2 PERMIT: 1- .1 4 CHECK# 2429 PROJECT:9 26· 9.· ,-a. f 9 DATE: 9 f /L· 1 -..INITIAL: '77 pa m fl L 4 43 7 79 9 /6 .SU ' 6-'--U LI LE- 3 L·au UL. ' i PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the County Commissioners Room, Pitkin County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, or objections.If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. DATE AND TIME OF MEETING:September 30, 1986, at 5:15 p.m. Tom Melberg, Lot 4, Little Texas Subdivision, requesting a 13' frontyard setback variance, a 13' sideyard setback variance to the north and a 10' sideyard setback variance to the south for a residential addition. James & Dorothy Wolosoff, represented by Hansen Construction, Tract R-28, Starwood Two, requesting a 6'9" rearyard setback variance for addition to existing structure. PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Members Present:Evan Gull, Chairman Joe Zanin Bill Lukes Bob Throm Kandi Shaffran Alternates Present:Bob Miller Melinda Pearson Spero Niarhos Building Department:Peggy Seegers, Zoning Official Evan Gull called the regular meeting to order.Lukes motioned to accept the minutes from the previous meeting and Pearson second the motion.All were in favor. Gull confirmed with the applicants that the proper notification signs had been posted. Tom Melberg 86-22 Lot 4, Little Texas Subdivision, requesting a 13' frontyard setback variance, a 13' sideyard setback variance to the north and a 10' sideyard setback variance to the south for a residential addition.Tom Melberg was there to represent self. The owner did not have definite plans available but wanted to get variance request "out of way". Gull requested limits for the Board's review.The setbacks restrict expansion of the cabin, which is now necessary with growth of family.Historically, the cabins in this subdivision has been extended to within 5' of the lot lines, therefore, his request to be 0' from the lot lines, he felt, was within reason. This did not match the request submitted, therefore creating a problem with the legal notice placed in the newspaper.The application as written was not clear on the amount requested and Seegers scaled the drawing to get the proposed setback footage. Melberg slated he did not plan to apply for a building pe.rmit at. this time, but would desire a 5' blanket setback variance. 1 The lot is 22,000 could fall under a that he would not line, but would en and stay within 10 sq.ft. and extremely narrow.This description lot zoned R-15.Lukes advised the applicant be comfortable with 5 feet from the property courage using appropriate zoning such as R-15, ' on the sideyard setbacks. Lukes moved to grant the variance request as advertised due to downzoning.Zanin second the motion.A vote was taken and all were in favor. James & Dorothy Wolosoff 86-23 Tract R-28, Starwood Two, requesting a 6'9" rearyard setback variance for addition to existing structure.Barry Edwards was the attorney representing the owners, along with the contractor, Steve Hansen.Ellie Brickham was there to present the Starwood Homeowners Association.There were two letters from adjacent property owners, Strand stating an objection to the request and Saslove stating his support. Brickham advised the Board that a variance would not be necessary as she had researched the matter, due to the fact that the part of the house in question fell within the AF-1 zone.The remainder of the house was within the RS-20.Seegers stated she would investigate that situation, but upon first reading felt Brickham was correct.Edwards requested a finding to insure that the applicant would not have to return before the Board. Therefore, Throm moved that the application be tabled pending such determination.Bill Lukes second the motion.A vote was taken and all were in favor. Zanin moved to adjourn the meeting and Throm second the motion. Meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, ,k.) LL Secretary L c:[026 Chairman Ad<fia/44 - 8779 ASPEN/PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT 506 E. MAIN ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-5973 00136 -61210 BLDG. PERMIT . -61212 PLBG. PERMIT -61215 ELECT. PERMIT -61214 MECH. PERMIT -63311 BLDG. PERMIT REVIEW -61220 REINSPECTION -63004 CODE BOOKS -63313 BOARDOF ADJUSTMENT ·-7 -L - 61002 CONTRACTORS LICENSE -61120 MOBILE HOME -63316 PLAN CHECK NAME:C f i vul . PERMIT:.1 J CHECK# dvo PROJECT: I DATE:0/ A. /·661,1., '1 1-1 9 INITIAL: (32) 0 .--7 0 r : . e. Arh0 - 4 .& 1 2 20"bf coLO -,* 2 4,/ JOHN *+ DAVID * 1 FIGHil.Z j j1 = ·',OGEDARE¢>;; 404 a w 8»ir o ',*it ·COF../94f>342 , r] 't, «f·te: 8 - Neal¢Bu<40 0 -' 0 >62 4 1 N i-%12.7, €·.ta./ ;' 7.1 jm·,i. ift Z/ ·1' ·f LS' t. 4 f ;1,/P::<dE .f.titi,):P %< ' -7 .- -d U.1 1%1. 'Allill /:1. 0f?%93·N' 7• INDE><: 2.1 £=btra105O= MAN <C fr \ A,ZOK FLA·4111471*101< ELEd«MON*esl-·lea,11»e·. . 4.1 1*TE:4<101< BLEX,0¢r[0144 . 6.1 0011-Pikle,/ KIAU.-0 0 9:*Cl//044 Z 6.2 00911>9 211 81.-Et>r<Id;AL PLAI€ CO99-18}CULE LU 9.1° F€UNIS@«rl ON,/ A.<2:3et*ADP 10»'/ < 3,2 1€05* 1**11 Ne FIA19 081*le 0 m.'. / - I 'zv.'16.#<f 'fti·94. :G R AI M ' ffx J %1 tE>*2442* . 3 9. . w ' a W :·t·Y 41>44#18)1 '. 93»22933'»90.0 4 ..:42'.:· 45 . LONGFELLOW B ASSOCIATES, 1NC.) A TATE OF COLORADO': DO HEREBY CERTIFY 2 1980. A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY. ate.,4 TEXAS SUB. SHOWN HEREON AND THE , 4*fit BE AS SHOWN ON' THIS PLAT. ALL IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWNTO ME ARE NO ACCURATE TO THE BEST ;OF MY S, INC. .0 Bel• 9018 ?F :,f@f=Wirf.Eti. »r·UL*h>-9 12%9*#*.C DATEAUGUST 29, DRAWN BY:S.w: REVISIONS: JOHNSON-LONGFELLOW 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. BOX 5547 'SNOWMASS VILLAGE, COLORADO 81615 JOB NO. 00-110 SCALE I" =26 JULY 29,1980 , · . ' 'H. W.J.-G.R.H. OVERLAYLOG r- & 'f 21 \ gp '00A 0- 'r/P 0 434 Do SYMBOLS 0 1,40/1- NOMBeR 7-< 6[/9/MCa DOOR NON#804 152521 '2266550 NINC»N TYPE 9A Block 0 4r\ Erri-in »SUL+TOW 1;frttla,4 NoeP+ EL-»4 1 PLUMEEENT Re·416ION DUPLEX.1;. i , 1 CE€*Ada LON'O.J Re 2-2 Mo DU *LE<el-av,rriaHS 1 1 Sno MALL ,%53 86\N GAADE ELEVA-nONS It HAROLD W JOHNSON, (JOHNSON- REGISTERED SURVEYOR IN THE S AW<DOC>07567 \ Re MAN 3 THAT ON THE 28TH DAY OF JULY 9 SUPERVISION OF LOT 4, LITTLE IMPROVEMENTS WERE FOUND TO Mall EASEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS SHOWN SAID SURVEY lS TRUE A SW/70/ KNOWLE,DGE AND BELIEF, Pli e.ylvaot JOHNSON-LONGFELLOW 8 ASSOCIA .¢9 0/MMES€ HAROLD W. JOHN/''L S 9018 6-4€6 % I e 82 4-4al 6 1-! EwsrAM SITE PLAN/ROOF PLAN0EhIEd€AL hIC-FES rita 401*41 1 LOAM-1€,ACTOIC TO L-IMIT DISTUI€13Ah.16€ TO 9176 15 AP¢U*i. 1.ANDEAPINB 0 5 10 I5 20 1 €6 TWERM 057-47 SCALE 1" -20' 42-7ZLE-eprpet,2 CONTRACTOR 10 UNAJEOT UTILITIte 00'NEe 1OTAL,04/ 12.AST AMOLNT 01: 15;15-TUI<MANCE 3 I a4es IMPROVE MENT SURVEY JIL s-e££20€46 3 VE>RIFY MOTHOO OF CONKIEDTIN[6TO EXISTIhle WAt€·12 ¢ €ENAIEK UNE€> 0 Al€.1--IrTEJT,LOT 4 LITTLE TEXAM PARCEL OF LAND IN SEC 16 T.9S. R.85 IPO BOX 2839 ASPEN COLORADO; 81612 303-925 -5713, ..