HomeMy WebLinkAboutPitkin.EH.273512300001 (1987)/,23-00—ooI
ASPEN*PITKIN
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PAR7TMENT
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT NO. 3
TYPE Or PERMIT:
( )Initial Construction ( )Emergency Use
or Installation
( )Una Permit as a result of Sale
ISSUED T0:
Owiler�
Mailing
Mailing
Address
I�Ropalr Work, (Piavloua Pe rm1! 10) ( )Alteration o[ an exlstin9 ayutem,
(PreviOU) Perm t 1 .)
( )Others
DATE OF ISSUE. 1
Home Phone Business Phone
Sewage Disposal System Work to be performed
Thin permit valid only (or premf ses location by the fol////l���loving legal dencrlptlont
LOT SIZE , WATER SUPPLY i_�1•TY , AVERAGE /�/,�(PERCOLATION RATEE CSJ_]'1
This Individual Sewage Disposnl Permit is granted with regard to the following use: /'If IVTCAJI)AiCG,-
Ntraber oft Bedrooms _� LoftsGarbage Disposals__ Dishwashers ^415�_ Clothes Washers
CALCULATED AVERAGE DAILY WASTE LOAD _/_GALLONS.
THE NATURE. OF THE SYSTEM INCLIUDED UNDER THIS PERMIT:
Type of Tank or Treatment Units Saline. • ANK Tank. Capacity _Gallon Minimum
Method of Final Disposals SEEPl1CC TM IAbaorptfoa. Area 2AFr Square feet Minimum
Description (including brand name, if any) of other equipment or• appurtnanceet
Other Conditions or Specifieationet \ / / /�G
APPR6VAL F04 0CM( /41�;AL.LA776A) ��E� avAA1......ttt!!f///J.
STAGES REQUIRING I?JSPECTION BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT:
( )Refore Excavation ( )Upon completion of excavation and prior to pleCtment of gravol W Before covering distribution
� �aystem of absorption field
(Prior to backf111 of any component ( )Other, Specifys
Plans and specifications of the proposed sewage disposal system have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Perml.se Aon
is hereby granted to tho owner or his agent to perform the work indicated above in accordance with the Pitkin County individual
Sewage Disposal Rclnslacions in effect on the date of issue. In addition to general provisions get forth an therev a heccef,
this Permit is subject to the following additional termmss� anti conditlonss
APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY / V.fC�`_ (title)
The above individual sewage disposal system installed by !/-/�occk PxciAj4 1U1 "Iyymc
has btc (n:spccted [urea a by a representative of the Aspen pithi� Cnvironmi:nta Ilea t Itcpartment. TFe owner oasumoa all
reeponstibiltly in case of failure or inadequacy of this)
his sewage ddjappdyeal system. Completo as -built drawing
DATE OE NAL INSPECTIO /
II'i TITLE ,
eL
130 Sout 'Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-2020
U60�'
jp
J
I L.
ASPEN*PITKIN
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH . DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FO$ AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL• PERMIT y
PHONE . ��i S ��/r 11 r�I D
Name of OWNER
Address of OWNER /
Name of APPLICANT < PHONE
PERMtT TO BEx ( )PSeked Up ()Mulled
( jowner
i
TYPE OF PERMIT: (
)New Inetellatlon
(
)Repnlr
J
)Emergency Use
(
)Alteration
NOT due to failure
Leyal Description � � ecren
Loa Blocksss�
Filing_ subdlvialon Size of Lot
l�[� Do you plan any furthe�,fsdditions to the
TYPE OF STRUCTURES ( )Single Family Dwelling Lf!Athezx residence? ( )YES yp No
No. of Dedroomsy -No. of Lofts f t r7x �� No. /Off darbage Dlaposals v /�y,._ ' No: of Automatic Dieh\waahers /�'Lc�_
No. of Automatic Clothes washers ,�-ti-�• ) L1rT_���J
or )Public; Name of System
WATER SUPPLYx ( )Private Nell, Depth_
( -/
( )Spring
( )Stream or Creek .
TYPES OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSEDx
Septic Tank/Absorption Field ( )Aeration Plant/Absorption Field ( )Compacting Toilet ( Ilncineratlon Toilet ( )Mound.
- )Vault Pr
( )Otherx
Becyclinge potable use ( )Raoyclinge other use ( ivy
it an be obtained.
The initial site inspection must be arranged with the Aepen/PS tk Sn Environmental Neal be Department ing5permit can bexob 1
before a permit can be issuad. The individual sewage disposal permit must be issued before a building perm e
FINAL INSPECTION APPROVAL MUST BE GIVEN BY THE ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO BACKFILLING ANY PORTION
OF THE SYSTEM.
Application for an individual sewage dlsposdl perms 1s hereby submitted. The undersigned i acknowledges that the above information
is true and that false informs ion wil h plida a the appl and any subsequent po m f
/ (/` DATE _
Signature of APPlicant
(This application becomes. invalid 11 months from the above data.)
NOTE: PLOT PLAN must be filed with this applications
Please locate the following items by measured distances:
1, property lines and dimensions.
2. proposed and existing water wells on subject property and
adjacent property.
3e Domestic water service lines.
{, proposed and existing buildings, driveways, and other
atrubturest
S. Streams, lakes, ponds, irrigation ditches, and other water
courses.
6. Proposed and existing individual sewage systems on subject
property.
SUBMIT A REVISED PLOT PLAN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IF INSTALLATION IS TO
BE CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL PLAN.
She sal permit application and a permit fee In the am
undersigned hereby �acknowledges receipt Of th1 individual savage dispount
De[a Fee Received='by
pt ReceiNumber Adminl■trativo OCClcor
130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 8'16'1'I 303/925-2020
VENDOR NAME 6 ADDRESS
SOUYY�0.\ V'h\�
OEPARTNENT:
C`1 I
uu vi T, ON �QN�Q1 j1 pc {
SPECIAL INSTRUCS IO NS
A SST. MANAGER APP ROYAL:
AGENCY SICtj{�TUft : FINNFCE DEPT, APPROVAL:
PROGRAM QUANTITY UNIT ( DESCRIPTION UN 11' PRICC I'fOiAL PR 1.CE
COiBLIANCE _ A_
mu
c 'Qerw.�t
XSPEN*PITKIN
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT i
FIELD TEST DATA SHEET
Legal decription.
Name of Owner:
Address:
(# & st. / p.o. box) (city) (state) (zip)
Name of Agent:
Water Supply: Public Utility Subdivision_ Private Well_
Lot Area: � Distance to Nearest Surf ce Water—%2—ft.
Dates Observations Made: Soil Borings: by
Percolation Tes s: by 4,EAoF
OIL BORING TESTS
CHARACTER Of BOIL "I" THICKNESS IM FACT
B-1
� B-2
NAMMINM MINIM
PERCOLATION TESTS
Average Rate: minutes/incn
Plan of the y/& site on the back
Date DQSignature
&06 NELSON
ASPEN/PITKIN
SANITARIAN
130 S. GALENA
• r n r k a r � 0 1 L 1 f
{
1
i
MEMORANDUM
To: Ellen Sassano, Community Development Department
From: Nancy MacKenzie, Environmental Health Officer \h
Date: July 23,1996
Re: Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Plan Amendment
---------_Parcel ID # 2735=123-0�0-01��_______________
The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the details of the
Aspen Valley Hospital District application under the authority of the Pitkin Couri
Land Use Code and has the following comments.
ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-170 and 3-110.40:
"It is the policy of the County to insure the availability of a water supply of adequate quality, quantity, pressure and dependability
for fire protection and support of a proposed land use prior to approval of theme. The County shall require land uses to hookup to
existing public systems if sgivice is available."
The applicant has agreed to serve the project with water provided by the Aspen Water
Department and failed to provide a "...letter of intent to service the proposal..." as
defined in the Pitkin County Code for the amended uses.
A condition of approval for this application is the receipt of the letter of
intent to service the proposal from the Aspen Water Department. Without
meeting this requirement a building permit cannot be issued.
SEW AGE TREATMENT -AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-18 and 3-1105: ,it is the policy of the
County to ensure that adequate sewage treatment facilities are available [o serve existing and new developments. Public and private
sewage disposal systems and connections to such systems shall comply with the sewage disposal guidelines of Pitkin County's
Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation."
The applicant has agreed to serve the project with public sewer as provided by the
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) and failed to provide documentation
":..that the applicant and the service agency are mutually bound to the proposal and
that the service agency is capable of serving the development..." as defined in the Pitkin
County Codep
A condition of approval for this application is the receipt of the letter of
intent from ACSD by the Environmental Health Department before a "
building permit can be issued.
WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2-14 and 3-705 and 3-710:
"It is the policy of the County to preserve and protect its present water resources. To this end it is the policy of the County that no
land use be initiated which would adversely affect the quantity, quality, or accessibility of the County's wal er resources; or which
would occur at the expense of established water -dependent agricultural activities; or which would result in increased salinization of
water resources, loss of minimum stream flows, further destruction of wildlife habitat, or major expenditures to reacquire
or
redistribute major water resources. It is also the policy of the County to maintain a natural vegetative buffer along its surface waters
such that the surface and groundwaters of the area me not encroached upon by land uses or other human activities which could
cause deterioration of water quality or impair the natural treatment processes provided by meadows and wetlands."
The Environmental Health Department will be addressing water quality impacts on
down stream water quality, Banner Associates, Inc. recommends that the proposed
1996 Masterplan Amendment will require modifications to the existing drainage
system. This application is not expected, to impact down stream water quality if the
mitigations recommended by Banner are implemented.
AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-13 and 3-602:
"Only that development is permitted which will not contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County.
Developments may not constitute an indirect or direct air pollution source under Federal, State or County regulations."
The applicant must ensure that traffic increases do not occur, by specific mitigation
measures. Sufficient measures to offset all traffic increases should be a condition of
approval and should be approved by the EHD prior to issuance of any building
permits.
There are details of the analysis with which we agree, including the fact that bringing
employees from downvalley commuting locations to where they work will reduce the
traffic impacts of these affordable housing units. While there will still be associated
trips (from shopping in town, service workers, visitors, etc.), the number will be
significantly reduced. Therefore, these units do not have to be mitigated. However,
providing any more parking spaces than is required by code should not be permitted:
Whether the doctors are located at the hospital or in town, the location is still in the
nonattainment area, and people will be driving about the same distance in either case.
Presently, people may go to the doctor's office and then walk downstairs to fill a
prescription or get labwork done. People will still be driving to the hospital the next
day for physical therapy. In addition, unless there is a condition of approval that the
existing offices be vacated permanently, these trips will be added to trips to the existing
offices, and/or doctors may use two facilities. In summary, there is no evidence
presented to document the contention that adding office space -will result in fewer trips.
2
Ruled on Rvyded Paper
A condition of approval should be that the applicant must provide a PMio.
mitigation program containing specific, enforceable control measures, which
plan must be approved by the Environmental Health Department. The plan
must include documentation showing that the proposed mitigation measures
will fully mitigate or offset all PMIo increases caused by the project in the
nonattainment area.
Activities such as road building and landscaping require a Fugitive Dust Plan. This
plan would need to include, but is not limited to, fencing, watering of haul roads and
disturbed areas, daily cleaning of adjacent paved roads to remove mud that has been
carried out, speed limits, or other measures necessary to prevent windblown dust from
crossing the property line or causing a nuisance.
A conon should be approval by the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health
Department of the fugitive dust control plan, containing enough measures to
ensure that dust does not become a nuisance or blow onto adjacent property.
The application states that there will be no fireplaces in any of the proposed new
buildings and additions, including the employee housing units and the Medical Office
Building
A condition of approval should be that the affordable housing units include
in their deed restrictions or their covenants that no devices other than
decorative gas fireplace appliances may be installed, as represented in the
application.
The application refers to a future underground parking garage. A registered engineer
specializing in ventilation system design should be consulted to ensure that ventilation
is adequate to prevent carbon monoxide from reaching high levels inside the facility or
in the nearby areas outside it.
CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: Section 2-7:
"It is tiie policy of the County to ensure that no use or development of land is permitted which is in violation of the laws of the
County, the State of Colorado, or the United States of America."
This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental
health laws.
Missing from the transportation/traffic analysis is any description of how the applicant
plans to offset the traffic impacts generated. Measures may include, and are not limited
to, plowing of, or payment for plowing of bike paths from the site into town in winter,
paving of unpaved parking lots, roads, driveways or shoulders, removal of existing
fireplaces, or similar measures unique to the specific application. The existence of RFTA
bus service alone does not cause people to take the bus into town or for errands, or for
service workers or visitors to use the bus. While ped trails exist in the area and connect
with downtown and the AABC, the trails are not plowed in winter when pollution is a
concern, and are a longer walk than many people want to take
Our calculations indicate that 335 trips need to be offset compared to the applicants
estimate of 371. The application is incomplete in that it does not provide an enforceable
mitigation plan for these trips.
Traffic impacts can be lessened from what will occur with the current application. In
particular, if the applicant really intends that people use mass transit, very few parking
spaces are needed. Providing more parking spaces than required under the county
code, for the hospital expansion, office building, and affordable housing, as well as
using Assisted Living Facility spaces, will accommodate additional cars, instead of
encourage use of RFTA instead. Limiting the number of parking spaces as much as
possible is essential to any effort to minimize or mitigate traffic impacts. We
recommend that the number of parking spaces be based on using the minimum
required by the Pitkin County Land Use Code for non-residential space (one parking
space for every 400 sq ft of ) and on using the City of Denver code requirements for
space not specifically identified by the Pitkin County Land Use Code (one parking
space per 600 square feet).
For example:
Current hospital 64,617 / 600 =107 have 161
Addition 51000/ 600 = 9 (9)*
Assisted Living Facility 27 room * 1 = 27 have 29
Medical Office Building 20,657/400 = 52 (63)*
Affordable Housing 15 * 1 = 15 (24)*
TOTAL
NEED 210 HAVE 190
Therefore, 20 additional parking spaces would need to be added, not 96* as proposed.
3
pmtetl on Rayrled Paper
l�
a
s