Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Pitkin.EH.264305300801-20 W Bourg Trail (2014)
ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (OWTS) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 76 Service Center Rd• Aspen, CO • 81611 Phone: 970.920.5070 Fax: 970.920.5374 Permit #: 0033.2014.powt Parcel ID #: 2643-053-00-801 Permit Issued: ®NEW CDU ['REPAIR ❑REMODEL/ADDITION ❑TANI<ONLY ['FIELD ONLY ❑AMENDMENT Owner(s): AVR AH LLC 770 Aspen Valley Ranch Rd and 20-60 W Bourg TrI Property Address: Legal Description: Agricultural Facilities Parcel Size of Lot. 91.2 Acres Detached Accessory Unit: DYES ®NO Size of Building: 3404 Sq. Ft. Size of Accessory Unit: Sq. Ft. This system is designed to accommodate: A 3-bedroom Caretaker unit #2 and Barn (previously on permit #0041.2013.powt) + Clubhouse + Historic Barn + Office Designed By: McLaughlin Water Engineers Phone #: Fax #: 970-925-1920 Perc Rate: 14 mpi Project #: Mailing Address: Email Address: Dated: 05/06/2014 Profile Hole Depth: 8 ft Depth to Groundwater or Bedrock: >8 feet Minimum Tank Capacity: 2721 total gallons Minimum Absorption Area: 1597 ft2 (30% reduction) Permit Conditions: This OWTS Construction Permit is approved on the condition of compliance with the engineer design as submitted with the application and the specifications cited above. Changes must be approved by this Department and the engineer prior to construction. This permit is to combine the flows from the 2 structures listed in the design for permit 0041.2013.powt and the flows from a new proposed clubhouse, the office building, and a historic barn with locker rooms to be added. Permit # 0041.2013.powt dated 10/21/2013 is void. Sewage will flow via gravity from all structures to 2-compartment septic tanks as follows: Caretaker unit #2 —1,000 gallons, Barn — 750 gallons, Clubhouse —1,500 gallons, Historic Barn —1,000 gallons, and Office - 750 gallons. Effluent filters shall be installed in the second compartment of each tank. Effluent will flow via gravity from each tank to 2 common effluent lines and then to a splitter box. Effluent will be split between (2) 4-trench soil treatment areas (69 existing quick-4 chambers in 3- trenchs of 23 units each + 115 new quick-4 chambers in 5- trenches). The system shall be a minimum of 10 feet to any property line. The soil treatment area shall be a minimum of 194 feet to all wells and 144 feet to any stream, pond, or unlined irrigation ditch. This Permit must be kept on -site during installation. The engineer must do a final inspection of the installation and submit an "as -built" letter to this Department within 30 days of the final inspection, unless a longer period of time has been agreed upon, in writing. This Department must also be called for the final inspection with a minimum of 48-hours notice. Minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features shall conform to the requirements of the Pitkin County OWTS Regulation. This Permit is conditioned upon the property owner(s) providing for regular inspection, cleaning, and maintenance of the system by qualified personnel, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and the requirements of the Pitkin County OWTS Regulation. Issuance of this OWTS Construction Permit does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or representation by the Department that the system will operate properly or will not fail. Issuance of this permit does not imply compliance with Pitkin County building and/or land use regulations, nor guarantee issuance of building and/or land use permits. THIS PERMIT IS EXPRESSLY CONDITIONED UPON COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY OWTS REGULATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED ABOVE. Plans and specifications for the proposed OWTS have been reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hereby given to the property owner(s) to perform the work indicated in accordance with the Pitkin County OWTS Regulation. This Permit will expire 1 year from the date of issuance unless construction on the system has commenced. An "as -built" drawing must be submitted and approved by EH before final approval of the system will be issued. Issued By: Kurt Dahl, REHS Date: 10/13/14 Expires: 10/13/2015 Installer: License #: Reactivation Authorized by: Final ApprovalIs u '� Date:New /'t//13- Expiration Date: �� 11 2. 00 Q 00?3, Zorc( pow EH/NR ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (OWTS) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION 76 Service Center Rd • Aspen, CO •81611 Phone: 970.920.5070 Fax: 970.920.5374 Parcel ID# (available from the Pitkin County Assessor's Office 970-920-5160 or at www.pitkinassessor.orq): 26q3 053 - be Purpose of Permit: EN NEW REPAIR DUE TO FAILURE L_.l REMODEL/ADDITION Cost of System Repair or Remodel/Addition (approximate): Property Address: 80 Aspen Valley Ranch Lane, Woody Creek, CO Lot: Block: Filing: Agricultural Facilities Parcel TANK ONLY (J FIELD ONLY Subdivision: Aspen Valley Ranch Property Owner(s)*: AVR AH LLC Owner's Mailing Address: 514 F. Hyman Ave Email Address: City, State, Zip: As en CO 81611 Home Phone: Business Phone: *Contact information must be provided for the owner signing this application. Primary Contact Person/Applicant (if not owner): Tom Newland Contact/Applicant Mailing Address: PO Box 4815 Cell Phone: (970) 618-9922 Fax Number (970) 927-4645 Company: Newland Project Resources. Inc City, State, Zip: Basalt, CO 81621 Business Phone: (970) 927-4645 Email Address: tom@npri.co Building Permit # (if applicable): 0031.2014.PRBK Lot Size (in acres): 91.2 Size of Building (square feet): 3,404 sf Number of Potential Bedrooms: 0 Detached Accessory Unit? YES ►2 NO Size of Accessory Unit (square feet): Number of Potential Bedrooms In or Fixture List for the Accessory Unit: Water Source: EI PRIVATE WELL SURFACE WATER n SPRING XI COMMUNI"lY/PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM Name of Community/Public Water System (if applicable): Engineering Firm: IVICGIaughlln Engineers Job Number: 85418291 Phone Number: 920-1920 Fax Number: 925-1974 Mailing Address: 2420 Alcott St., City, State, Zip: Denver, CO 80211 'LEAST RFAD BEFORE SIGNING: I certify that the above information is complete and accurate and that I have provided complete and accurate information in all of the documents included in my application package. I acknowledge that EH/NR may revoke any permit I am issued if my application is found to contain any inaccurate, false, or misleading information. I understand that no construction may be undertaken on an OWTS until an OWTS Construction Permit is issued. Owner Signature (Required): Applicant Signature: - rFOR OFFICE USA+ LY Received by tN/HR Staff: Date: Date: Fee & Receipt #: Date: G:\OWTS Mal, i :;, _008 NEW REGS\Office - Adrnin\forms\OWTS Const Forms\OW'IS construction peril* applicatiun.xis Updated: l.0/7/00 �c„.v‘cic‘ \--\ouse ONSIITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (OWTS) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST 76 Service Center Rd • Aspen, CO • 81611 Phone: 970.920.5070 Fax: 970.920.5374 A complete application package must be presented at the time of your pre -application conference for acceptance. To schedule a pre -application conference, please call 970-920-5070. PLEASE INITIAL EACH ITEM TO INDICATE COMPLETION Only one copy of each item is necessary. OWTS Construction Permit Application (completed) K Site Plan f� Please 'ndicate the type of document to be submitted below. 11" X 17" and/or Electronic document emailed to ehnr(a.co.pitkin.co.us before the date of the pre -application conference • All designs must be 1" to 20' in scale. 1 Site plan must include locations of existing wells, buildings, property lines, ditches, water lines, springs, irrigation lines, drinking water cisterns, drain tiles, water bodies, wetlands, riparian areas, floodplains, dry gulches, and existing OWTSs. Soil Testing Notification & Report (must be provided by a PE) it This Department should he notified when soil tests are conducted. A 2"- 4" perforated PVC pipe should be placed in the soil `profile hole for monitoring purposes. I; I Report must include percolation test results and the soil profile evaluation. Building Floor Plans 11" X 17", or submitted electronically to ehnr(a?co.pitkin.co.us before the date of the pre -application conference. Land Use Approvals & Other Relevant Permits & Approvals Recorded Site Plan that designates approved envelope(s) for development. If the property is exempt from this requirement, please have a Community Development Planner email ehnrco.bitkin.co.us with confirmation of the exemption. 24" X 36" and • n 11" X 17", or electronic document emailed to ehnr(a,co.pitkin.co.us before the date of the pre -application conference I Copies of all land use approvals, as well as all other documentation relevant to the siting of the OWTS(s) and any other development on the property (e.g., Resolutions, Administrative Decisions, recorded easements). Comments from EH/NR regarding Land Use review referrals can be accessed by opening http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/7/landuse.pdf and clicking the blue link in the "Referrals" column. Referral comments more than 2 years old may need to be requested from the County Planning Department. Construction Management Plan Required & Obtained 11 Not Required Requirements: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/7/C Manuat.pdf Forms: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/depts/7/bldgdiv.cfm Proof of Adequate Water Supply Legal water supply must be demonstrated in accordance with Colorado water law and meet the requirements of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. 11 Private systems: Proof generally includes a well driller's report, well permit issued by the Colorado Division of Water Resources, final augmentation plan (if required), and a recent pumping report. Wells must be drilled before an application will be accepted. n Public systems: Proof generally includes a letter from the CWQCD - approved public water system confirming it has sufficient water to supply the development and it has agreed to do so. Initial Site Inspection I I All components of the OWTS, as well as the proposed buildings, water source, and other pertinent physical features must be clearly staked and labeled prior to the inspection. Inspection must be scheduled between May 1st and Oct 31st, unless otherwise approved by EH/NR. Applicable Fee 1 OWTS Construction Perm' : $1,023* U Tank Only: $523* *There is an additional Administrative Fee of $175.00 for properties in the Town of Snowmass Village. Please Make Checks Payable To: Pitkin County Environmental Health & Natural Resources Department TO SUBMIT A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PRIOR TO OBTAINING AN OWTS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT THE FAST TRACK WAIVER MUST BE SUBMITTED TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. Please note that this waiver only allows for the submittal of the Building Permit Application. It does not allow for the issuance or approval of the Building Permit without OWTS Construction Permit approval from the EH Department. OWTS March 8, 2008 NEW REGS\Office - Admin\I=orms\OWTS Const Forms\OWTS Construction checkiist.xls Updated:3/20/09 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ MERRICK' & COMPANY McLaughlin Water Engineers A Division of Merrick & Company MERRICK McLAUGHLIN ENGS Ltd. 111 P AABC ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970-925-1920 970-925-1974 fax mweaspen(7rof.net MEMORANDUM Dated: UPDATED June 3 2014 To: Pitkkhi County Environmental l-lotilth; From: Doan Doro@ier; Merrick bUilc La ughlin, Ltd, RE: Aspen Volley Ranch CORE AREA SEPTIC SYSTEVUJ "; 2 Woody Crook In Oct of 2013 the AVR Coy ,, Area OSDS System 8 2 was constructed under the approved permit nt nuihei° 7101. Bocause all the AVR Core Area facilities an©i building uses have changed, reduced in size and in the number of bedrooms, the proposed AVR Gore Area 8 System has changed significantly, Wo arro proposing t0 combine the two systems in to one instead of constructing two separate OSDS systems. This memo relates to the addition of DSDS under permit 7101 and LIDS Permit fit 7100 will not be used or constructed. The following revisions combine the two proposed systems under ono use. It will continue to be galled the AVR ISLES Core Area System 8 2 and all of the facilities installed for # 2 will remain in use. The combine average tlow is 1,8 b gpd u_ndov the2,000 gpd needed for state review. The water system for AVR will be a community water system with typical cornrirm city supplies and uses. No individual welly will be use System 8 7 — Original = To remain in use o Caretaker Unit # 2 - 3 bedrooms Barn —1 bath and washer o Single Family Home type washer r and 1 person Barn horse stall cleaning area is not to be connected to till o KIDS. Oct] enr'ill ujo to cs1 debris separation system and to drywells. • 75 gallons per day per person due to smaller structures all under 2,000 SF • Per Rates .. 14 WWI by HP Geotech o Afache ri Ground water 30'+1m feet from surface not encountered ▪ Water System is a Central Water System for Fire & Domestic Service Permotted Welk McLaughlin Water Engineers 111 P AABC, Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970-925-1920 F970-925-1974 ��-� � n r r n n � n= f,, System Design i9 gravity flow from the tanks s to the flew systems consisting sting of infiltrators n . n a n. �� r �t in'vol�rators in trenches and evenly distribution of flows, I calculated theflows for y nern 2 as follows. System r 2 Caretaker Unit # ;.;r, 3 bedrooms — et X 2 ;S '16gpd X 1.76 :707a6 gal o Barn —1/2 bath and typical SIM Clothes Ukfrishor Use typical dwelling for 1 person (Toilet) ': ' (Washer) . Oland Sink) (Mop Sink)46GoO X ,.�J Peaking Factor 79 GP1) Barn House stall cleaning area is not to be connected to the UAW • 0 Willi Total (Q) f 707.E + 79 ' 066 GPD Tank Sizing - System # ; 066 X 1.26 1082 gallons Install 1 „ 1,000 gallon tank for the Care Taker Unity 2, and a 760 gallon tank or the Barn — 1,760 gallons total. l Grave placed a tank outside each building to allow solids to be settled out close to the source and having only effluent flow extended distances required to get to the ISDS Disposal Field. . ADITIONAL USES TO BE, ADDED: We propose to add the following hEAV11I Core} Area uses to the existing Core Area System 2: The Aspen Valley Ranch Core # 2 OWS/ISDS will add a clubhouse, historic barn and office, none of which have any bedrooms, but we have calculated the size based upon the average daily uses. Clubhouse o r�3,500 square feet o Washer, Sink, Dish Washer and other Mist uses — 85 GPD —age( o Bar — 30 GPD o 3 employees at 20 GPD = 60 GPD 20 people per day @30 GPD = 600 GPD o Average Flow is 775 GPD Historic Barn 1-1/2 bath 0 2 = full baths 2 • Washers o Sink o Average flow is 150 gpd see tio�eS Croce ec.k labiZ°111° Ta Ve ,,2g--Z o•t\,;(/54-th ki (7/ GP) McLaughlin Water Engineers 111 P AABC, Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970-925-1920 F970-925-1974 4U:j `1-1 /2 bath Average 1I01519 is 25 gpd C90 `Dotal average flow 776 160 25 Tc--2 950 gpcal esign flow .- Avg daily slow X I MO peaking fac it 960 X 1 °5 t:19426 gallons per day„ rants Sizin System — Clubhouse install 1 n 19" C0 canon ,=1hiI Historic Bah [i`d " 1,000 gailon `n; -iod& Office • 750 gallon tank All new CON CRE N '=° tanks will be double chambered and shall be located in series below or in the open area next to the buildings. A Biotube shall be installed in the outiot too of each 61e1119 tank. lnstail ,an 0SI 4°° diameters Biotube, or equal. The housing is to be 36" high with a cath'idge length of 28", using SDVI 35 PVC piping. Toes 1still be in stalied on both the influent and effluent links of the tank; set on the inside ou the tank. Set top of line from the within 1" of the tank roof and extend line downward 14°" below centerline of tee. 6U kiixirinum cover over access to tank shall be 6 " and easily accossihle for maintenance. Asbuilt location of the tank Iids for future maintenance. Do not bury tank access Iids more then 6". Bedding under and within 6°° of the tanks will be roadbase compacted to 95%. Installation of native fill Or scree6aed rock around the tanks out kJo the bedding zone is acceptable. Fill and test all new tanks with water prior to backfill to check for leaks and leave water in tank tor placing the system in service Piping from the buildings to the new tanks and from the tanks to the new OW S system will be 4°° SDR 35 PVC Iaid at a minimum of `l %. insulate lines with less than 42" of cover or in uninsulated crawl spaces. depth is 3.W° for all piping. Use standard 2" Blue Board insulation placed 12" above the pipe and laid Ohl a flat bedding surface if less then 3.5' of cover on all pipelines to and from the septic tanks. Install cleanouts at 100 foot intervals (min) between house and septic tank and tank and leach field. P existing infiltrator system r AVR < CG�±1 System : 6) r>r.<� II<a yy 9 existing infiltrator system of A�v R Core Area l� �S System .y a �n��ec °' d under permit #7101 is 3 rows of 23 units or 09 total units. Area of Septic fiold_r quircd S stem McLaughlin Water Engineers 111 P AABC, Aspen, Colorado II1611 P 970-925-1920 F970-925-1974 Percolation Rate minute per inch A=0/5 IC Load factor IC 9rt) Peskin flow is 866 for the original uses and `19426 for the addition for a total of 29291 'gpd. System requirements will be based on the 2, 916PD Design How �r1 PI% fA l (7-1 GOB) Bar-4 Credo Cr ve) Z1e GPP A 2,29' UU3 X SR 14 1.4 = MOO square foot Th > new ye hire will be an infiltrator trench system 2400 SF needed np, 9,8 Sq fi per unit (l ri.�in��a 4's) = 245 infiltrators C _, '-'itkiirrn County allowance 30 for Vu e of infiltrators 172 _units The c existing system consists of 3 rows of 23 units ki nc h ii'ow nkld 69 TOTAL, infiltrators (Quock !•'s). ADDB ZONAL UNITS REQUIRED: 103 units are needed to meet the design requikerriraents, design is Tim 115 additional infiltrators. (104 TOTAL) The acditi o n to system # 2 will have 115 units in 5 rows of 23 uuick 4 units for a total of 184 infiltrators. We have maintained the length of the trenches to allow for even distribution. Info will replace the existing splitter to allow for 2 inlet pipes, (1 frorm the mdsting uses, and 1 from the new uses) and have 4 outlet lines, (1 - each of 2 rows of infiltrators) Total length of each trench is 92 feet long. Each trench will be stepped down and offset slightly to fit the site if needed. Ilflax installation depth shall be 18" of cover over the top of the infiltrator... These both are gravity flow systems using infiltrators and normal cijstribution. new CONCRETE "Baffled" Splitter Box will evenly distribute, flow to each of the new infiltrator trenches in each of the blew systems. Splitter box shall have aun access lid extended to within 666 of final grade. Splitter box must be installed on solid compacted soils to insure box is set flat and will noi: settle. Ala pipe bedding to consist of a minimum of under and 6" over the pipe of native soils with maximum sized material of 1 Rake trench bottoms and sidewalk l)i for to iliStallaeion of infiltrators. System location to be field determined to reduce tree and vegetation removal, site conditions, and maintain setbacks. Contour the trenches to fit site conditions and the topo ofthesi�,e. m pChanges t.ast be approved by the engineer and homeowner. Trenches are to be 10° alma rt !Minimum depth 3 2°°; maximum depth 0 18°' to top {? c, a _a _ s C? ( Use of infiltrator. ln�_�t�all access poi-�s�/vei-nt.� on each row of trenches. collar on n � � n n � n � � A F' � � !', _ v 0 a , ' does r' � vont as it ���ei-netiates the infiltrator to insure pipe does not drop into infilti ,tor. McLaughlin Water Engineers 111 P AABC, Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970-925-1920 F970-925-1974 n with . VV rr' <.� `a �- �> -> the entire �� n � � Install Trenchers to b � with in 0.1 of? level L1C1C S the entire len lth o'u' each rola/. splash plates under the entry and exit piping at each end of each row w of infiltrators. (Splash Plate '1' Wide and ` 8" LOrr1m)„ The engineer shall finalize olovaidons of the tank and trenches in the field, Installation and operation shall be approved by the engineer prier to final acceptance1 Owner is recoUnnraended to pump the septic tank at 2 yeac intervals and change the L- aottibe. Landsca pirrm and am a:c rin g us on top of septic field shall be nlinini zed or eliminated., System must meet all Pitkin County ISDS requirements and illiV 9E design standards and must be inspected by I IWE and Pitkin County prior to Final Approval. Provide adequate notice for inspections. Ukfe will both need to inspect the tank installation, distribution piping, new infiltrators, spiitkk bwc See attached ISDS Completeness form for more information on installation requirements and inforrrnation needed for asbuilts. The contractor or installer i �Ea r ��'► 1 r-auGir� Lam. va c, ca and County �� n 'J008 n '• ro fie oa responsible to supply the fle sii_pci e=oo�g�neer and Court with ©is wilt information prior to final acceptance. 0. Dean Derosier, P. F. gdd\AVRCORE ADDITION to # 2 ISDS McLaughlin Water Engineers 111 P AABC, Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970-925-1920 F970-925-1974 Owner's Name OWTS DESIGN CALCULATIONS - for Pitkin Aspen Valley Ranch Agricultural Parcel ID # House Size (sq. ft.) (75 gpd or 100 gpd) Number of Bedrooms in Maul House Number of Offices, Libraries, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Main House Number of Bedrooms in Detached Caretaker unit Number of Offices, Studies, Similar -sized Rooms in Caretaker Unit (lf the caretaker unit is ATTACHED, treat as if part of main house. Average Daily Waste Flow State Review Required? Perc Rate 14 (T) Design Flow (Q) = # potential bedrooms X 2 people/bedroom X gpd X 1.5 Q= 2177 Minimum tank capacity 2721 gallons Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SQRT perc rate)(1.4 loading factor) A = 2,281 sq. ft. of absorption area required 75 3 Absorption Area (=Q/5 X SQRT perc rate) WITH SECONDARY r1.REATMEN"I' (no loading factor) A= 1,629 sq. ft of absorption area required Abs. Area w/ loading factor (B25) Trench Pipe and Gravel (-10%) 2053 Dosing (-20%) 1825 Chambers (-30%) Max Allowable (-50%) 1140 Secondary Treatment Abs Arca w/ out loading factor (B28) Trench Pipe and Gravel (40%) 1466 Dosing (-20%) Chambers (-30%) Max Allowable (-50%) 194.16 SETBACK FROM WELL # of feet = 1303 1140 815 144.16 SETBACK FROM POND, STREAM OR IRRIGATION DITCH # offeet = 119.16 SETBACK FROM DRY GULCH # of feet = no red. (-20%) (-10%) (-30%) no red. (-20%) (-10%) (-30%) Bed Bed 2281 1825 2053 1597 1629 1303 1166 1140 Quick4 Trench 208 185 116 149 132 116 83 Quick4 Bed 231 185 203 162 165 132 149 116 ��'� ` �-5 69 `l5 'rn(47)2 OA�\ =- °1 O n ; A-5 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE ASPEN VALLEY RANCH SPECIAL REVIEW, 1041 HAZARD REVIEW, CONCEPTUAL SUBMISSION AND GMQS EXEMPTION Resolution No. 9e-2005 RECITALS 1. SGS-Ranch LLC ("Applicant") has applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado ("BOCC") for approval to develop 8 new single family residences on parcels ranging from 35 to 120 acres, to create a new 35+ acre parcel around the existing ranch house and a 35+ acte Agricultural Facilities Parcel that encompasses the existing agricultural buildings and affordable housing units. The Applicant is requesting approval for a total of 96,750 square feet of floor area for the development, with no more than 3 of the residences containing in excess of 10,750 and up to 13,250 square feet of floor area. The following approvals are requested and required: A. Rezoning of 245 acres of the ranch to Rural/Remote; B. 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission to establish building envelopes; C. GMQS Exemption and Special Review to establish the parcels as TDR receiver sites (for initial development rights and additional floor area); 2. The property is located on Upper River Road, and is more specifically described in Exhibit A. 3. The property is comprised of two separate parcels that contain a total of 731 acres. The property is zoned RS-20/PUD with the exception of approximately 2 acres of land that is zoned AK 1. 4. The Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission ("Commission") considered the proposed application at a regularly scheduled meeting on May 17, 2005, and recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. 5. The BOCC considered this application at duly noticed public hearings on July 27 and August 10, 2005, at which times evidence and testimony were presented with respect to the application. The BOCC reviewed and approved the Development Agreement on August 24, 2005. 6. The BOCC finds that the proposed building envelopes are located on slopes of less than 30% and avoid the 100 year floodplain and critical wildlife habitat areas; the wildfire hazard is rated as low to medium and can be mitigated; the debris flow hazard can be mitigated; 7. The BOCC further finds the development is consistent with the special review criteria for TDR receiver sites and caretaker dwelling units, and that the proposed development otherwise complies with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code ("Code"). 8. The BOCC further finds that an extended vested right of 15 years is appropriate because the proposed development promotes the public benefit in a manner consistent with, and which promotes the policies and requirements contained in the Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the BOCC that it does hereby approve the Aspen Valley Ranch 1041 Hazard Review, Conceptual Submission, Special Review and GMQS Exemption, subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest. I I I I I I I I 1 H i SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY C i 51625 1111 Pag: 1 .065f 10 10/1e4/2002:201 R 0.00 D 0.00 Resolution No. //*-2005 Page 2 1. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the application or in public meetings or hearings and shall consider those representations to be conditions of approval, unless amended by other conditions. 2. Prior to submission of any earthmoving, access, [SDS or building permit applications, the Applicant shall: A. Record the Subdivision Exemption Plat. The exemption plat shall identify the public trail easement. B. Submit 1041 Hazard Review Site Plans to the Community Development Department for approval and recording. The owner must sign the mylar copies of the site plans prior to submittal for recording. The Applicant shall amend the site plans as follows, prior to submission for recordation: 1) Include the location and dimensions of building envelope setbacks from property lines, and/or tie in the boundaries of the building envelopes to a permanent marker. 2) Eliminate shading of envelopes. C. Submit the revised Protective Covenants, Development Agreement and Trail Easement for review and approval by the County Attorney and the Community Development Department, prior to recordation. D. The Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement dated May 18, 1992 and recorded as Reception No. 344911 shall be amended as follows: 1) For the purpose of determining rent and/or sale prices, the existing units at 20, 31 and 559 Aspen Valley Ranch Road shall be classified as Single -Family Detached Category 3 units and the units at 55, 71, 80 and 105 Aspen Valley Ranch Road shall be classified as Single -Family Detached Category 1 units. 2) The Housing Authority shall qualify all occupants of the units as to employment. Occupants must not own developed residential real estate or a mobile home in those portions of Eagle, Garfield, Gunnison or Pitkin Counties, which are part of' the Roaring Fork River drainage. 3) The Applicant shall provide financial security to assure the removal of any unit if the owner thereof is found to have breached the terms and conditions of the Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement. E. Provide documentation to the Housing Office to verify that the current tenants of the employee housing units comply with the provisions specified in condition D2 above. 3. Concurrent with recordation of the 1041 site plan(s), the Applicant shall: A. Record the Protective Covenants, Development Agreement, and revised Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement. B. Obtain Irrevocable Certificates of TDRs from the Rural/Remote tracts, and execute and record the deed restriction against further development of the tracts. C. Record the public trail easement, which shall allow pedestrian, snowshoeing and cross-country skiing from the Rio Grande trail across the ranch and the Werk-Cook parcel up Red Canyon to the BLM land. Dogs shall be prohibited. The trail shall be closed from December 1 to March 31 each year. 4. All documents shall be recorded within 180 days of the date of this approval. 11 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO i 11 516266 Page: 2 of 10 10/14/2005 02:201 R 0.00 D 0.00 Resolution No. /I,1. 2005 Page 3 5. The Development Agreement shall be amended prior to recordation to specify that the following shall vest based on the standards of the Code in effect on the date of approval: floor area entitlements utilizing TDRs; GMQS exemptions granted; maximum floor area and the current floor area definition; minimum and maximum lot size; building height; road and property setbacks; stream setbacks for Lots 4, 8 and 9; grading and placement of fill; and preservation or creation of scenic viewplanes. 6. Prior to submission of an ISDS permit for each parcel, the Applicant shall provide documentation of a legal water supply and adequate quality and quantity of water to the Environmental Health Department. Wells must be located within the building or development envelopes, or in a location outside of the envelopes that is approved by the Community Development Department. 7. Prior to building permit application for a new residence on each of each of Parcels 1-7 and 9, the Applicant shall submit one executed Irrevocable Certificate(s) of TDRs to allow up to 5,750 square feet of floor area on each parcel, acid a copy of the deed evidencing conveyance of the Certificate(s) to the Applicant (if applicable). The Applicant may replace the existing residence on Parcel 8 up to the size of the original unit or 5,750 square feet of floor area, whichever is greater. The Applicant may submit additional TDR Certificates or.may utilize growth management allotments for additional floor area on Parcels 1-9 up to the maximum specified in # 12 below. 8. The Applicant shall complete the floodplain/debris flow mitigation berm and clear the Red Canyon and Dry Woody Creek channels as shown on the Schmueser Got don Meyer plans dated 7/5/05, prior to issuance of any permits for development on Lots 4 or 8, or redevelopment on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel. 9. Prior to submission of any building permits for residences on any of Parcels 1-7 and 9 and a replacement residence on Parcel 8, the Applicant shall obtain an Access Permit to improve Aspen Valley Ranch Road to the "Country Access" standard specified in the Asset Management Plan from the intersection with Upper River Road to the driveway to Parcel 4. The permit shall be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer and the Fire Marshal. 10. Prior to issuance of building permits for residences on Parcels 5, 8 and 9, the Applicant shall obtain an Access Permit to improve the applicable driveways from Aspen Valley Ranch Road to the driveways to the building envelopes on those parcels to the "driveway" standard in the Asset Management Plan, but with a minimum 16' wide driving surface. The permit shall be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer and the Fire Marshal. 11. Prior to issuance of building permits for residences on each of Parcels 1-7 and 9 and a replacement residence on Parcel 8, the Applicant shall: A. Obtain a fireplace/woodstove permit from the Community Development Department. B. Submit a drainage and erosion control plan for review and approval by the County Engineer. C. Obtain a driveway/access permit, which shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Aspen Fire Marshal. D. Obtain a site specific foundation investigation for each of Parcels 5-9. E. Obtain ISDS permits from the Environmental Health Department. The systems must be designed by a registered professional engineer, shall be located within the building or development envelopes, and must comply with the setback requirements from surface and groundwater sources. F. If the residence exceeds 5,000 square feet, submit a Traffic and Parking Management Plan in accordance with the Asset Management Plan for review and approval by the County Engineer. G. Submit a landscaping plan, for review and approval by the Community Development Department. H. Pay the applicable road impact and housing impact fees. 11101111111111111111111111111 Page: 3 of 10 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO 10/14/2005 02201 R 0.00 0 0.00 Resolution No. fit -2005 Page 4 I. Pay a capital replacement fee in the amount of $5,222.22 to RFTA. This fee shall be adjusted upward to reflect the value at the time of payment based on the annualized rate of inflation as published in the Consumer Price Index (Denver/Boulder/Greeley CPI-W not seasonally adjusted, which index stood at 189.2 on July 1, 2005) as established by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 12. The total floor area of all residences shall not exceed 96,750 square feet. No more than 3 residences may contain floor area in excess of 10,750 square feet and up to 13,250 square feet, provided that the residences on Parcels 6 and 7 shall not exceed 10,750 square feet. Subject to the foregoing, the Applicant shall allocate the allowable square footage of Floor Area for each parcel either at the time of the initial sale of such parcel or upon application for a building permit for a residence on such parcel, whichever first occurs. The Floor Area to be allocated shall be set forth in a document entitled "Allocation of Floor Area" which shall identify the parcel for which the allocation is made, shall be signed by the Applicant and recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. Thereafter, the Allocation of Floor Area as set forth in the recorded document may only be amended by and through an amendment to the Final Approval Resolution processed pursuant to the regulations of the County then in effect. 13. Agricultural buildings are prohibited on Parcels 1-9. Agricultural facilities on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel shall be limited to a total of 30,000 square feet, with no one building exceeding 5,000 square feet. The floor area of the employee units on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel shall not exceed 10,000 square feet, with no one unit to exceed 2,000 square feet. 14. Prior to commencement of any earthmoving or construction activity, the Applicant shall stake the corners of each building and development envelope and install construction fencing around the perimeter of the building and development envelopes. The fencing shall remain in place until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the residence. 15. No development, including grading, excavation, fill placement, berming, landscaping, entry or ranch gates, construction parking and staging, vegetation removal or disturbance, septic system and well, shall occur outside of the approved building and development envelopes, except to comply with the required wildfire mitigation. Utility and driveway extension and maintenance shall occur within approved building or development envelopes. 16. Only plant species listed in the Pitkin County Revegetation Guide (or species native to the site) shall be utilized to revegetate areas outside of the building envelopes that are disturbed by construction of access drives and installation of utilities, subject to a revegetation plan approved by the Natural Resources Division prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. However, if agricultural areas are disturbed, those areas may be planted with agricultural crops that are not included in the Revegetation Guide. 17. Exterior lighting shall comply with the County's lighting regulations in effect at the time of' installation. Exterior lighting is prohibited on any facades that face Highway 82 except where necessary to comply with health and safety requirements of the building code. 18. The exterior of the residences shall be finished in earth tones, which blend with the colors of the natural surrounding environment. Roof materials shall be non -reflective. 19. 'The Applicant shall comply with the following measures to mitigate impacts to wildlife: A. Native vegetation shall be maintained outside of the building envelopes, except for agricultural crops. B. Provide waste storage that complies with the County Code regarding bear -proof containers. llflhIUhIHIUI I I V IIII SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY C 111 111 516266 Page; 4 of 10 10/14/2005 02;201 R 0.00 0 0.00 y Resolution No. illy -2005 Page 5 Verification of compliance shall be provided prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. C. Avoid fruit -bearing trees and shrubs in any landscaping. D. Dogs shall be kenneled, with the exception of working ranch dogs when at work. E. All new fencing outside of the building envelopes that is not necessary for livestock retention shall comply with the following: 1) Wood fencing shall employ three rails or less, be the round or split rail type, shall not exceed 48 inches in height above ground level and 12 inches in width (top view), and shall have at least 18 inches between two of the rails. 2) Wire fencing shall consist of no more than 3 strands of smooth wire and shall not exceed 42 inches in height. 3) Existing fencing shall be brought into compliance. F. Horse hay shall be fenced at the owner's expense with 8' game -proof fencing and other feed shall be kept in bear -proof containers. 20. The Applicant shall comply with the following wildfire mitigation standards: A. For a distance of 15 feet around all structures establish and maintain vegetation at 6 inches or less, with mowed grass, low growing perennials or some type of hardscape (e.g., sidewalk, pavers, rock mulch). B. Beyond the 15-foot perimeter and up to 30 feet keep grass mowed to a height of 6 inches or less. C. Future landscaping within 100 feet of any structure shall be spaced no closer than 10 feet from the outermost branches. The lower limbs of conifers should be rernoved up to 10 feet or half the total height of the plant to eliminate ladder fuels. D. Roofs shall be constructed with a Class A roof covering or a Class A assembly as defined in the International Building Code (IBC) Section 1505.2. Wood shake/shingle roof coverings are prohibited in all wildfire hazard areas. Roofs with less than a 3:12 pitch are not permitted unless they comply with the following: 1) All roof coverings shall be constructed of non-combustible materials and installed on a Class A roof assembly. 2) All roof coverings shall have a surface that shall facilitate the natural process of clearing the roof. 3) All roof designs shall facilitate the natural process of clearing roof debris. Protrusions above the roofline, such as parapets, shall be prohibited. 4) Roofs shall be installed as required by the approved building code and shall have a minimum slope of 1:48. 5) All roof designs, coverings or equivalent assemblies shall be specifically approved by the Fire Marshal prior to submittal of a building permit application. E. Vents shall be screened with corrosive resistant wire mesh with mesh 'A inch maximum. F. Roofs and gutters shall be kept clear of debris. G. Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash, and flammable debris. H. All flammable materials and firewood/wood piles shall be stored on a parallel contour a minimum of 15 feet away from any structure. I. Swimming pools or ponds shall be accessible to Fire Department vehicles. J. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris. K. Wood fences shall not connect to the structure. L Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container. M. Propane tanks shall be installed according to NFPA 48 standards and on a contour away from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around any above -ground tank. Any wood enclosure around the tank shall be constructed with materials approved for 2 hour fire -resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls. KIWI IC1u NI I III I11 IAhI IN III Page: 5 of 10 10/14/2005 02:201 R 0.00 D 0.00 Resolution No. 1 *12005 Page 6 N. Each structure shall have a minimum of one 10 pound approved ABC fire extinguisher placed in a visible and accessible location. O. Addresses shall be clearly marked with 2 inch non-combustible letters and shall be visible and installed on a non-combustible post. P. New utility lines shall be buried within roadways. 21. The Applicant shall comply with the applicable codes and requirements of the Aspen Fire Protection District Each owner shall install a 20,000 gallon underground water storage tank with a hydrant within the approved envelopes, prior to final inspection of the residence. 22. The Applicant shall comply with the County's Noxious Weed Management Plan. 23. Any development located within setbacks shall require a variance from the Board of Adjustment. This approval does not assure approval of the variance. 24. Failure to comply with these conditions of approval may result in revocation of this permit or any subsequent permits related to this property or vested rights associated with this property. 25. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set forth in Pitkin County Land Use Code, § 4-140 and C.R.S., § 24-68-105. The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on - August 10, 2025. IIIlIpNU10IIUIInNnJI1 516266 Page: 6 of 10 10/14/2005 02:201 R 0.00 D 0.00 Resolution No. /I'-2005 Page 7 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY on the 26`I' day of June, 2005. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on the 10`1' day of August, 2005. PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPT ON F TED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in the Aspen Times Weekly on the day o Jean -ff a Jones, Clerk to e BOCC AP OVED AS TO CONTENT: ALIA)Q6 C;14/4- Cindy Houben Community Development Director P076-03 PID #264305400001/264304100005/264304200033 2005. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO By eteldeir-Wes..." Pretae.:4. Patti Kay -Clapper, Chair APPROVED AS TO FORM: John Ely County Attorney 1111 Page: 7 of 10 10/14/2005 02:20f R 0.00 D 0.00 17' ifigri SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER ENGINEERSISURVEYORS 1041 Special Review Approval Aspen `Malley Ranch GLENWC.Ou .` rRINGS ASPEN 1 1 8 W. 6TH, SUITE 200 P.O. DOX 2155 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 8 160I ASPEN, CO 8 161 2 970-945- 1 004 970-925-6727 FX: 9 70-945-5948 FX: 9 70-9 2 5-4 1 5 7 20 September 2005 111 r SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO ORESIbO BUTTE P.O. BOX 3088 CRESTED BUTTE, CO 81 224 970.349-5355 roc: 970.349-5358 516266 Page: 8 of 10 10/14/2005 02:204 0 00 D 0.00 A parcel of land located in W1/2 of Section 4, the S1/2 of Section 5, the NE1/4 of Section 8 and the W1/2 of Section 9, Township 8 South Range 85 West 6th P.M., Pitkin County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of the 1st Amended Plat of Aspen Valley Downs Subdivision P.U.D. as recorded in Plat Book 49 at Page 2, also being the C1/4 Corner of said Section 4, with all bearing being relative to N00°00'24"E between the E1/4 Corner and the NE Closing Corner of said Section corner of Section 4, thence along the Northerly and Westerly boundary of said Aspen Valley Downs the following eleven (11) courses N86°48'00"W a distance of 209.39 feet thence S86°49'20"W a distance of 399.76 fee thence S90°00'00"W a distance of 1548.54 feet; thence S18°44'09W a distance of 994.62 feet; thence N65°14'29'E a distance of 573.48 feet; thence S52°25'58"E a distance of 870.39 feet; thence SOO°45'26"W a distance of 373.33 feet; thence S50°31'43"E a distance of 1,026.94 feet; thence S02°29'27"E a distance of 787.59 feet; thence 859°42'09"E a distance of 445.52 feet; thence S00°05'31 "W a distance of 434.56 feet to a point on the north line of a tract of land described in Book 360 at Page 750 of said Pitkin County records; thence along the Northeasterly line of said tract of land the following six (6) courses: N79°54'10"W a distance of 94.00 feet; thence N66°36'00"W a distance of 190.54 feet; thence S73°50'34" W a distance of 25.46 feet; thence N50°09'43" W a distance of 694.62 feet; thence N40° 48'28" W a distance of 53.72 feet; thence S29°44'29"W a distance of 9.18 feet to a point on the North line of a tract of land described in Book 607 at Page 824 and exception recorded in Book 207 at Page 351; thence along the Northerly line of said tract of land the following ten (10) courses N31 °42'00" W a distance of 244.04 feet; thence N50°21'00"W a distance of 276.85 feet; thence S77°36'00"W a distance of 91.74 feet; thence S03°35'00"W a distance of 112.12 feet; thence S25° 59'00"E a distance of 80.50 feet; thence S54° 00'00"W a distance of 309.60 feet; thence S36°03'00"E a distance of 163.23 feet; thence 323°21'00"E a distance of 258.25 feet; thence S34°15'00"W a distance of 100.49 feet; thence S44°24'00"E a distance of 35.18 feet to point on the Northwesterly boundary of a tract of land described in Book 360 at Page 750; thence along the Northwesterly line of said tract of land the following five (5) courses S29°59'20"W a distance of 550 01 feet; thence 878°52'16"W a distance of 111.31 feet; thence S22°22'18"W a distance of 385.83 feet; thence T SCHMUESER GORDON f MEYER ENGINEERS JSURVEYORS GL.ENWOOD SPRINGS 118 W. 6TH, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 8 1601 970-945- 1 004 FX: 970-945-5948 ASPEN P.O. BOX 2155 ASPEN, CO 8161 2 970 925-6727 FX: 9 70-9 2 5-4 1 5 7 CRESTED BUTTE P.O. BOX 3088 CRL• $TED BUTTE, co 8 1 224 970-349-5355 FX: 970-349-5358 SO4°32'55"E a distance of1048.40 feet; thence N69°50'55"W a distance of 441.36 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way tine of the former Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad; thence along the Northerly line of said right of way N47°05'56"W a distance of 488.61 feet to the West Tine of said Section 9; thence along the West line of said Section 9 NOO°02'48"W a distance of 171.07 feet to the Northerly right of way line of a County Road; thence along the Northerly line of a County Road the following six (6) courses 92.31 feet along the arc of a 3,790 40 feet radius non -tangent curve to the right, having a central angle of 1°23'43" and subtending a chord bearing N41 °36'27"W a distance of 92.30 feet; thence N40°54'35"W a distance of 394.51 feet; thence 267.49 feet along the arc of a 818.28 feet radius curve to left , having a central angle of 18°43'46" and subtending a chord bearing N50°16'28"W a distance of 266.30 feet; thence N59°38 21 "W a distance of 241.25 feet; thence 185.83 feet along the arc of a 478.57 feet radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 22°14'54" and subtending a chord bearing N48°30'54"W a distance of 184.67 feet; thence N37°23 27"W a distance of 193.98 feet; thence 209.10 feet along the arc of a 540.90 feet radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 22°08'57" and subtending a chord bearing N48°27'55"W a distance of 207.80 feet; thence N 59°32'24"W a distance of 327.82 feet; thence 86.55 feet along the arc of a 214.69 feet radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 23°05'53" and subtending a chord bearing N47°59'28"W a distance of 85 96 feet, thence, N 36°26 31"W a distance of 248.86 feet; thence 192.08 feet along the arc of a 1075.49 feet radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 10°13'59" and subtending a chord bearing N41 °33'31 "W a distance of 191.83 feet; thence S41 °28'04"W a distance of 125.27 feet to a point on said Northerly right of way line of the former Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad; thence along said N ortherly right of way line the following three (3) courses N47°05'56"W a distance of 685.74 feet; thence 408.54 feet along the arc of a 5,779.65 feet radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 4°03'00" and subtending a chord bearing of N49°07'27"W a distance of 408.45 feet, thence N51 °08'56"W a distance of 1,122.73 feet to a point on the boundary of a tract of land described in Book 207 at Page 355 of said Pitkin County records; thence along the Easterly line of said tract of land the following five (5) courses N34°59'18"E a distance of 111.08 feet; thence 281.34 feet along the arc of a 530.00 feet radius non -tangent curve to the left, having a central angle of 30°24'52" and subtending a chord bearing N50°14'12"W a distance of 278.05 feet; thence 201.94 feet along the arc of a 2,097.30 feet radius a reverse curve to the right, having a central angle of 5°31'00" and subtending a chord bearing of N62°41'12"W a distance of 201.86 feet thence N59°55'42"W a distance of 165.00 feet; thence S30°04'18"W a distance of 67.00 feet to a point on said Northerly right of way line of the former Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad; thence along Northerly line of said right of way the following two (2) courses 43.25 feet along the arc of a 2,914.93 feet radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 0°51'00" and subtending a 2 ID N r0 N ® N 0 LO 0 NCi eEa mi 0 0 ffis H Z 0 0 Z_ F-- H a U) Q H J H 9 SCHMUESER , GORDON I MEYER E N G I N E E R S ! S U R V E Y O R S Gt. ENWOOD SPRINGS ASPEN CRESTED BUTTE I 18 W. 6TH, SUITE 200 P.O. BOX 21 55 P.O. BOX 3088 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. CO 8 1 60I ASPEN, CO 81612 CRESTED BUTTE. CO 81 224 970-945-1004 970-925-6727 970-349-5355 FX; 970-945-5948 FX: 970.925-4157 FX: 970.340-5358 chord bearing N57°39'26"W a distance of 43.25 feet; thence N58°04'56"W a distance of 171.58 feet to the Southeast Corner of the West Ranch Subdivision according the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 48 at Page 30 of said Pitkin County records; thence along the boundary line of said West Ranch Subdivision the following three (3) courses N00°00'00"E a distance of 914 43 feet along the Southeasterly line; thence S90°00'00"W a distance of 1,185.00 feet along the Northerly line; thence S30°00'00"W a distance of 307.23 feet along the Westerly line of said West Ranch Subdivision to the Northerly right of way line of said Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad; thence along the Northerly line of said right of way line the following two (2) courses 14.98 feet along the arc of a 1,482.68 feet radius non -tangent curve to the left, having a central of 0°34'44" and subtending a chord bearing of N67°42'34"W a distance of 14.98 feet thence N67°59'56"W a distance of 317.81 feet to the West line of Government Lot 5 of said Section 5; thence N00°00'00' W a distance of 608.36 feet along the Westerly line of said Lot; thence N89°26'06"E a distance of 2,657.16 feet along the North line of Government Lots 5 and 6 of said Section 5 to the C1 /4 Corner of said Section 5; thence N89°24'47"E a distance of 2,536.83 feet along the North line of Government Lot 7 of said Section 5 to the Southwest Corner of Government Lot 1 of said Section 5; thence N00°06'08"W a distance of 694 67 feet along the West line of said Government Lot 1; thence S56°00'00"E of distance of 676.38 feet; thence N79°41'00"E a distance of 101,17 feet; thence N79°41'00' E a distance of 162.48 feet; thence N52°12'00"E a distance of 195.35 feet; thence N45°11'00"E a distance of 23.22 feet thence N00°00'00"E a distance of 180,69' feet; thence N89°5739E a distance of 2,301.26 feet, thence SOO°06'43"W a distance of 648.11 feet to the East —West Centerline of said Section 4; thence N86°45'26"W along the East-West Centerline of said Section 4 a distance of 441.52 fee to the point of beginning, containing 485.6323 acres more or Tess. \SINpage: 10 of 10 10/14/2005 02:20i SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 0.00 D 0.00 Q:20051341,00111041 specialreview.doc 3 +ttft'Ott?�* 4a. DE V ILL *OPM 11 N ll AGREEMENT " VESTED RIGHTS FOR ASPEN VALLEY RANCH THIS AGREEMENT is made this 02 day of O,6," , 2005, by and between the Board of County of Commissioners (the "Board") of Pitkin County, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado (the "County"), and SGS-Ranch, LLC, a Colorado limited Liability company ("Developer"), RECITALS: A, Developer is the owner of approximately 486 acres of real property situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. In this Agreement, the property described in Exhibit A shall be referred to as "Aspen Valley Ranch." B. Developer applied to the County for various approvals in order to develop Aspen Valley Ranch as a residential subdivision. C. The Board granted final approval for Aspen Valley Ranch at its regularly scheduled meeting on August 24, 2005. Such "Final Approval" consisted of conceptual submission approval, a growth management quota system exemption, special review approval for the establishment transferable development rights receiving areas, construction of caretaker dwelling units and 1 041 hazard review approval. The Final Approval of the Board was embodied in Resolution No. t U2 (the "Final Approval Resolution") which was recorded as Reception No. 5( G 6 of the Pitkin County records on the IH day of (Cn)oQ f' , 2005. D. The Final Approval Resolution included approval to file a Subdivision Exemption Plat and 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan for Aspen Valley Ranch (the "Exemption Plat"). The Exemption Plat was recorded in the public records of Pitkin County at Reception No. l Book 76 , at Pages H --. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the terms and conditions herein stated and for other valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Intent. It is the intent of the parties that this Agreement shall constitute a development agreement as referenced in C.R.S. § 24-68-104 for the purpose of establishing vested property rights as defined therein for a period of fifteen (15) years. 2. Right to Development/Vested Property Ri hts. (a) Developer shall have the right to undertake and complete development of Aspen Valley Ranch and the residences and facilities described in the Final Approval Resolution, and to use, occupy, sell, encumber or lease Aspen Valley Ranch and its facilities subject to the terms and conditions ofthe Final Approval Resolution, the Exemption Plat and 1ll�NI� h I S, ,�I COUNTY N MAIN i Page : 1 of 4 10/14/2005 02:372 R 21.00 D 0.00 atestimati this Agreement. Such rights shall vest in the Developer, and its successors and assigns, as benefits and shall run with title to the land. The Final Approval Resolution and Exemption Plat as approved by the County constitute a "Site Specific Development Plan" pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-68-101, et seq. (b) The development rights and uses described in this Agreement and/or included in Final Approval Resolution are vested for a period of fifteen (15) years from the date of Final Approval which, for the purposes of this provision, is October 12, 2005, During the 15-year vesting period ending October 12, 2020, Developer and/or its successors or assigns shall not be subject to any addition, modification or amendment to the Land Use Code or to any other regulation not in effect on the date of vesting which amends or has the effect of amending any of the following: (1) any provisions of the Land Use Code which restrict or eliminate the growth management exemptions approved in the Final Approval Resolution; or (2) the provisions of the Land Use Code which establish the amount of square footage available through utilization of transferrable development tights; or (3) the regulations, requirements, standards and conditions concerning the following provisions of the RS-20 Zone District in effect on the date of this Agreement (all terms are as defined in the Pitkin County Land Use Code, unless otherwise noted): (i) maximum floor area, or the calculation or definition thereof; (ii) minimum and maximum lot size; (iii) building height; (iv) road, property or stream setbacks for Homesteads 4, 8 and 9; (v) grading and fill placement; and (vi) preservation or creation of scenic view planes. (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, no provision hereof shall be construed to exempt Developer or any future owner or owners of Aspen Valley Ranch from the requirements of Final Approval Resolution, building permits, or other necessary permits or approvals which become applicable subsequent to the approval of this Development Agreement. Nor shall any provision hereof be construed to preclude the application of the Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, Plumbing Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code, or other requirements reasonably necessary for the protection of the public health and safety. 3. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by the County and the Developer. 4. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns, II II I1II I i 2 ILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO 5i6272 Page : 2 of L:371 10/14/2005 R 21.00 D 0.00 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be signed the date and year first written above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO n By: d ve—ors _.-so / 7see-Ateel Name ora»e>t ea, CF0-rerep Title: 0 , : G:\Client\SGS-AVR\Development Agreement 090605.wpd 3 SGS-RANCH, LLC, a Colorado limited liabili. .mpany BY: SEY SV�.Y, AGER David J. Myler, Attorney -in -Fact for Seymour Svirsky 1111110111111111111110111111 516272 Page: 3 of 4 10/14/2005 02:371 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 21.00 D 0.00 Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ASPEN VALLEY L EY RANCH Homesteads 1 through 9 and the Agricultural Facilities Parcel as shown on the Subdivision Exemption Plat for Aspen Valley Ranch recorded 1 0 .-19 , 2005, as Reception No. 516'2n' , in Plat Book t7G , at Pag6 4, of the Pitkin County records. 1111111111101111111111011111111 16272 Page: 4 of 4 10/14/2005 02:371 SILVIR DAMS PITK N COUNTY CO R 21.00 D 0.00 TRAIL EASEMENT "Easement") isl � C�chfOe r This Trail Easement (the Easement) made and entered into this day of , 2005, by and between SGS-RANCH, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor") and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, as the governing body of Pitkin County, Colorado (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). RECITALS: A. Grantor is the owner of two contiguous parcels of land in Pitkin County, Colorado, known and referred to herein as "Aspen Valley Ranch" and the "Werk Cook Parcel." Aspen Valley Ranch is described on the Subdivision Exemption Plat recorded in Plat Book "76 at Page S j - (Reception No.5 I GT79of the Pitkin County records (the "Exemption Plat"). The Werk Cook Parcel is more particularly described on Exhibit A. B. Grantor desires to establish a Public Trail Easement within and across Aspen Valley Ranch and the Werk Cook Parcel subject to certain restrictions and obligations as set forth herein. C. Grantee desires to accept the Public Trail Easement described herein, subject to the restrictions, and to assume certain responsibilities in connection therewith. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Grantor and Grantee agree as follows: 1. Grant of Trail Easement. Grantor hereby grants, transfers and conveys unto Grantee for the use and benefit of the general public, by quit claim only and without warranties of title, a non-exclusive easement and right of way (the "Public Trail Easement") over and upon Aspen Valley Road and Dry Woody Creek Road as depicted and described on the Exemption Plat, which lies between the Denver and Rio Grande Trail and River road; and the ten -foot -wide easement area within and upon the Werk Cook Parcel as described on Exhibit B, subject to the restriction and obligations set forth herein. 2. Trail Use Restrictions. Use of the Public Trail Easement by the public shall be limited to hiking daily, between sunrise and one hour before sunset and between April 1 and November 30 of each year. The Public Trail Easement will be closed to public use during the winter months, from December 1 of each year to March 31 of the following year. Except for the owners of the lots described on the Exemption Plat and the Werk Cook Parcel and the families, invitees and guests of such owners, no horses, dogs, motorized vehicles, firearms or commercial uses shall be allowed within the Public Trail Easement, and users of the Public Trail Easement shall not be allowed to carry firearms. Grantee shall have no obligation for the enforcement of the foregoing restrictions, nor any other provisions of this Trail Easement, against users of the Public Trail Easement or other third parties. �V RNIIRIIIIIVI�IIIIIIIIIIIIININ 51627 Page: 1 o:I2,36, 10/14/200 t R 31.00 D 0.00 3. Construction and Maintenance. The Public Trail Easement within Aspen Valley Ranch follows the alignment of existing roadways. Grantor shall not, by the terms of this Trail Easement, be required to improve, realign or upgrade any portion of the roadways as they exist on the date hereof. Grantor shall be obligated to maintain the roadways in a condition that will allow reasonable pedestrian access pursuant to the terms of this Trail Easement, Grantee shall have no responsibility, nor any authority, for the maintenance, repair, replacement or upgrade of said roadways. Nothing herein shall, however, preclude Grantor from undertaking and performing such maintenance, repair, replacement or upgrade to the roadways, including paving, as Grantor, or its successors and assigns, determine is necessary or desirable, so long as such work does not unreasonably restrict the public's use of the roadways intended by this Trail Easement. Grantor shall construct a new trail along the alignment described on Exhibit 8 within the Werk Cook Parcel. Grantor shall thereafter be responsible for the reasonable maintenance and repair of said trail. Grantor may assign such responsibility to a homeowners' association representing the owners of Homesteads within Aspen Valley Ranch, whereupon Grantor's responsibility for maintenance and repair shall terminate. The Public Trail Easement may be closed temporarily during construction activities or in the event of circumstances which could endanger users of the Public Trail Easement. 4. Grantee's Obligation to Insure. The parties acknowledge that the Grantor is entitled to the benefits, protections and limitations on liability afforded by Colorado law, including C.R.S. Sections 33-41-101 through 105. Grantee agrees to add Grantor (and its successors and assigns in the ownership of Aspen Valley Ranch and the Werk Cook Parcel, or any of them or any part thereof) as additional named insureds on its comprehensive general liability insurance policy, which insurance shall be maintained by the Grantee to provide protection against liability from claims arising out of the use of the Public Trail Easement. Such insurance shall be carried in amounts not less than the liability limits specified in C,R.S. Section 24-10-114(1), as it may be amended from time to time, and shall provide Grantor and its successors and assigns with thirty (30) days advance written notice prior to cancellation or termination. Grantee shall, upon written request therefor from Grantor or any successor or assign, provide a Certificate of Insurance as verification of compliance with these requirements. 5. Attorneys' Fees. In the event the interpretation or enforcement of this Public Trail Easement should ever become the subject of litigation between Grantor, or its successors and assigns in the ownership of Aspen Valley Ranch and the Werk Cook Parcel, or any part thereof, and Grantee, the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of its reasonable costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. 6 Binding Effect/Amendment. This Public Trail Easement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of Grantor, including all future owners of Aspen Valley Ranch and the Werk Cook Parcel, or any of them. The Public Trail Easement shall not be assignable by Grantee. The benefits and burdens hereof shall also run with the title to Aspen Valley Ranch and the Werk Cook Parcel. This i 11 111 imp 111 2 516271 Page: 2 of 6 10/14/2005 02:36f R 31.00 D 0.00 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO PublicTrail Easement may only be amended by a writing signed by Grantee and by the then record owners of Aspen Valley Ranch and the Werk Cook Parcel. SGS-RANCH, LLC BY: SEYM► Or SV By : David J. Myler, Attorney -in - Fact for Seymour Svirsky Date: MANAGER AT : / BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY STATE OF 06 w RR AO COUNTY OF t' Ft 611; ) ss. By: Date: /eV/ 1/29 Ne. The foregoing Trail Easement was acknowledged before me this / t" day of OG:.fo lie , 2005, by David J. Myler, as Attorney -in -Fact for Seymour Svirsky, Manager of SGS-RANCH, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commis .sue exp4i Mb ' - `` - 0 46 0 14• o /7 1011 u fi 111111 111 IIa fl ILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO Notary Public 3 516271 a wina Page: 3 of 6 10/14/2005 02:36; 00 D 0.00 STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF PITKIN ) ss. he foregoing Tra' _. r ement was aclialowledged before me this day of , 2005, by /; 074191 ommissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado. WITNESS my hand and official seal, My commission expires: G:1Client\SGS-AVR\Trail Easement 101305.wpd nfittetes on behalf of the Board of County Nota fy Public ii hIY II11Hh1IV 11 111 111 516271 Page: 4 of 6 10/14/2005 02:361 R 31.00 D 0.00 • 1 • • EXHIBIT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land situated in Lot 1, Section 4, and Lot 1, Section 5, Township 9 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P,M., more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of Said Lot 1, Section 5 whence the Northwest comer of said Lot 1, Section 5 beers N 00°06'08" W 628.22 feet; thence N 00°06'O8" W 628.22 feet to the Noilhwost comer of said Lot 1, Section 5; thence N 89°59'59" E 992.08 feet along the North line of said Lot 1, Section 5 and Lot 1, Section 4; thence S 00°00'00" W 823.12 feet to the center of Dry Woody Creek; thenco S 45°11'00" W 23.22 foot along the center of Dry Woody Creek; thence S 52°12'00" W 195.35 feet along the center of Dry Woody Creek; thence S 79°41'00" W 263.65 feet along the center of Dry Woody Creek; thence N 56°00'00" W 076.38 feet to the point of beginning. BEING HISTORICALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A tract of land situated in Lot 1, Section 4, and Lot 1, Section 5, Township 9 South, Range 85 We,st of they 6th P.M., more fully. described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of Said Lot 1, Section 5 whence the witness comer to the Southeast corner of said Section 5 bears S 04°33' E 2572.12 feet; thence N 626.37 feet to the Northwest comer of said Lot 1; thence East 989.82 feet along the North line of said Lot 1, Section 5 and Lot 1, Section 4; thence South 823.52 feet to the center of Dry Woody Creek; thence S 45°11' W 23.22 feet along the center of Dry Woody Creek; thence 79°41' W 263.65 feet along the center of Dry Woody Creek; . thence N 56° W 674.97 feet to the West line of said Lot 1, Section 5, the point of beginning. ° 11 i i i i 11 • ILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO h i 111 516271 Page: 5 of 6 10/14/2005 02:361 R 31.00 D 0.00 J October 13, 2005 Job# 2005-341.001 EXHIBIT B Aspen Valley Ranch 30' Access, Public Trail & Utility Easement A strip of land situate in Section 4, Township 8 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M., Pitkin County, Colorado, being described by centerline as follows: Said strip of land being thirty (30') feet in width, extending fifteen feet (15') each side of the following described centerline, in such a manner that the exterior boundary lines of said strip shall be lengthened or shortened as necessary to form a continuous strip exactly thirty feet (30') in width. Beginning at a point along the Northerly boundary of the county right of way for Upper River Road with all bearings being relative to N00°00'24"E between the East 1/4 Corner and the Northeast Closing Corner of said Section 4, whence a found USGLO Brass Cap Witness Corner for the Southwest Corner of said Section 4 bears 888°40'05"E a distance of 3335.13 feet, also known as Aspen Valley Ranch Road; thence along the center line of said Aspen Wiley Ranch Road the following fourteen (14) courses: N46°52'05"E a distance of 164,88 feet, thence N53°06'53"E a distance of 60.48 feet; thence N65°46'40"E a distance of 53.16 feet; thence N69°36'40"E a distance of 81.81 feet; thence N72°44'06"E a distance of 145,24 feet; thence N64°29'10"E a distance of 98.11 feet; thence N57°58'32"E a distance of 435.53 feet; thence N45°24'46"E a distance of 202.86 feet, thence N59°48'23"E a distance of 57.38 feet; thence N70°28'S8"E a distance of 257.47 feet; thence N65°07'52"E a distance of 213.94 feet; thence N85°36'23"E a distance of 405.65 feet; thence N89°13'18"E a distance of 511.33 feet; thence N82°22'04"W a distance of 58.22 feet to a point where Dry Woody Creek Road intersects Aspen Valley Ranch Road, whence the said Witness Corner for the Southwest Corner of said Section 4 bears S40°5124"E a distance of 1283.44 feet; thence along the centerline of said Dry Woody Creek Road the following Twenty-one (21) courses: N59°01'29"E a distance of 93.11 feet; thence N3934'37"E a distance of 67.38 feet; thence N26°23'36"E a distance of 64.70 feet; thence N18°20'43"E a distance of 196,98 feet; thence N19°20'49"E a distance of 44.80 feet; thence N33°27'07"E a distance of 37 67 feet; thence N39°41'20"E a distance of 160.71 feet; thence N39°17'54E a distance of 63.51 feet; N64°21 24"E a distance of 61.56 feet; thence N71 °59'41 "E a distance of 67,91 feet; thence N64°37'27"E a distance of 43.24 feet; thence N57°00'25"E a distance of 82.19 feet; thence N50°24'35"E a distance of 169.24 feet; thence N34°45'23"E a distance of 101.96 feet; thence N27°11'46"E a distance of 121.65 feet, thence N29°39'19"E a distance of 160.40 feet; thence N18°35155"E a distance of 59.86 feet; thence N08°37'02"E a distance of 43.11 feet; thence N12°55'51"E a distance of 38.99 feet; thence N10°51'57"E a distance of 34.73 feet; thence 34.73 feet; thence N16°07'09' E a distance of 41.60 feet to a point along the Southerly boundary of a Parcel of land described in Book 26 at Page 50; thence along a trail as it exists the following ten (10) courses: N15°17'28"W a distance of 46.47 feet; thence NO2°33'59"E a distance of 138.24 feet; thence N09°17'52"E a distance of 69.90 feet; thence N17°05'34"E a distance of 55.88 feet; thence N14°01'53"E a distance of 115.43 feet, thence NO2°18'39"W a distance of 83.85 feet; thence N14°58'321'W a distance of 38.78 feet; thence N00°27'24"W a distance of 21.33 feet; thence N10°13'17"E a distance of 19.99 feet, thence N04°41'59"E a distance of 60,00 feet; thence continuing along said trail as it exists approximately 232 feet to the Northerly boundary of said Parcel described in Book 26 at Page 50, also being the point of terminus. Q:2005/341.001 /TrailEsmt.doc 1111ll111l11lllllll SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO 11 516271 Page: 6 of 6 10/14/2005 02:36i R 31.00 D 0.00 RECEPTION#: 552118, 08/19/2008 at 04:02:41 PM, 1 OF 5, R $0.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO GRANTING PARTIAL APPROVAL OF THE ASPEN VALLEY RANCH AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, SPECIAL REVIEW, GMQS EXEMPTION AND DESIGNATION TO THE PITKIN COUNTY HISTORIC REGISTER Resolution No.Ol -2008 RECITALS 1. Aspen Valley Ranch LLC ("Applicant") has applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado ("BOCC") to amend the prior approvals to include the following: A. Designate the Bourg Homestead and Barn to the Historic Register, and obtain incentives for the designation; B. Deed restrict three dwelling units on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel — two new units and the Bourg Homestead; C. Restore and enhance Dry Woody Creek as it traverses the property, and construct ponds and wetlands; D. Realign the entry road and construct a new road to the upper bench to serve Homesteads 6 and 7, as well as Aspen Valley Downs Lots 6-9; E. Install a central water system; F. Construct two accessory structures with bathing facilities on Homestead 8; G. Amend building and development envelopes. 2. These amendments require the following approvals: A. Amendment to Development Permit B. Designation to the Historic Register C. Special Review D. GMQS Exemption 3. The property is located on Upper River Road, and is described as Homesteads 1-9 and the Agricultural Facilities Parcel, Aspen Valley Ranch Subdivision Exemption and Lots 6-9, Aspen Valley Downs Subdivision. 4. The property is zoned RS-20/PUD with the exception of approximately 2 acres of land within the Agricultural Facilities Parcel that is zoned AH. The Aspen Valley Ranch property contains a total of 485 acres that is divided into 10 parcels, each in excess of 35 acres. The Aspen Valley Downs lots contain 16.667, 17.22, 11.585 and 12.679 acres, respectively. 5. The BOCC approved Resolution No. 112-2005, which granted Special Review, 1041 Hazard Review, Conceptual Submission and GMQS Exemption for Homesteads 1-9 and the Agricultural Facilities Parcel. The BOCC granted 20 year vested rights with the approval. The irrigated hay fields are encumbered by two agricultural easements that benefit Aspen Valley Ranch and Aspen Valley Downs. Approximately 79 of the 85 acre AFP is encumbered with a wildlife easement that benefits Aspen Valley Downs. The Board of County Commissioners approved the Aspen Valley Downs Subdivision/PUD in 1992; the final plat is recorded in Plat Book 28 at Page 90. 6. The BOCC considered this application at duly noticed public hearings on April 23, May 14, June 4 and June 23, 2008, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to the application. Resolution No.i 1 -2008 Page 2 7. The BOCC finds that the following amendments comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code: A. Designation of the Bourg Homestead cabin, barn and potato cellar to the Historic Register, and as an incentive for the designation, granting of a GMQS exemption for 5,000 square feet of floor area on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel 3,500 square feet for the Ranch House and 1,500 square feet for two accessory structures with bathing facilities. B. Deed restriction of three dwelling units on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel. C. Realignment of the entry road and construction of a new road to the upper mesa (Homesteads 6 & 7 and Aspen Valley Ranch Lots 6-9) and construction of a new "Core Road" on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel. D. Debris flow mitigation on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel E. Stream Enhancements on the upper and middle reaches of Red Canyon and Dry Woody Creeks. F. Ditch improvements in the lower pasture below the point where the blue line/intermittent lines on the USGS maps for Red Canyon and Dry Woody Creeks end. . G. Amendments to the following envelopes: • 1) Development envelope on Homestead 4 for the outdoor riding ring 2) Development envelopes on Homestead 5 for the irrigation and fire protection pond and on -site wastewater treatment system. 3) Activity Envelopes on Homesteads 2, 3 and 4 for grading and pasture. 4) Expansion of building and development envelopes on and relocation of the access to Homestead 9. H. Construction of two accessory structures with bathing facilities on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the BOCC that it hereby designates the Bourg Homestead cabin, barn and potato cellar to the Pitkin County Historic Register. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the BOCC that it does hereby approve the proposed amendments, subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: 1. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the application or in public meetings or hearings and shall consider those representations to be conditions of approval, unless amended by other conditions. 2. The Applicant shall comply with all conditions of BOCC Resolution No. 112-2005, except as amended herein. 3. Prior to submission of any earthmoving, access, ISDS or building permit applications, the Applicant shall: A. Be required to submit for approval by the County Attorney an amended Subdivision Exemption Plat that depicts the roads shown on the United States Survey for Township No. 9 South, Range No. 85 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, as surveyed, examined and approved in November, 1888, as those roads cross the subject property. The plat shall be accompanied with an appropriate plat note of explanation approved by the County Attorney. Until the BOCC determines that there is insufficient evidence to pursue a public access claim across the subject Property, or until it is judicially determined that there is no such public access, or until the road as shown on the 1888 Map is either vacated, relocated or determined to be in an alternative location, Resolution No.6) -2008 Page 3 no development, except intersecting roads, shall be permitted within the area 30 feet on either side of the center line of such road. B. Be required to submit for approval by the County Attorney and Community Development amended Site Plans. The above referenced approvals shall be a condition precedent to finalization and recordation. The owner must sign the mylar copies of the site plans prior to submittal for recording. The Applicant shall amend the site plans as follows, prior to submission for recordation: 1) Homestead 1: Exclude the County road right-of-way from the development envelope. 2) Homestead 4: Include the flood mitigation berm envelope as shown on the original site plan. Eliminate the portion of the waste water disposal envelope that is located within the floodplain. 3) Homestead 8: Include the flood mitigation berm envelope as shown on the original site plan. 4) Agricultural Facilities Parcel: Include the flood mitigation berm envelope as shown on the original site plan. 4. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Bourg Homestead or issuance of building permits for the two new employee housing units, the Applicant shall be required to submit for approval by the County Attorney and the Housing Office a Deed Restriction for the three employee housing units on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel. The deed restriction shall be amended as follows: 1) Eliminate the provision that allows the Applicant to demolish the units without replacement. 2) In Paragraph #6, Condominiumization specify that a new deed restriction shall be submitted for approval by the County Attorney and the Housing Office prior to recordation of the condominium plat. Prior to recordation of the new deed restriction, the Housing Office shall inspect the units to ensure that they comply with the criteria in the Housing Guidelines regarding the condition of the units. The condominiumization event and the deed restriction shall insure the affordability of the properties/lots/units, including appropriate restriction of potential future assessments, dues, or other such fees. 5. Concurrent with recordation of the amended subdivision exemption plat and site plans, the Applicant shall: A. Record a covenant in a form acceptable to the County Attorney in which the Applicant agrees to maintain the Bourg Homestead, barn and potato cellar in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation or the County's design guidelines for historically designated properties, once adopted by the BOCC. B. Record the Deed Restriction for the employee housing units. 6. Within 30 days of the date of this approval, the Applicant shall submit an access permit application for the Core Road to the Planning Engineer for review and approval. If a portion of the existing road on the west side of the Ranch Core is to be reclaimed, the Applicant shall submit an earthmoving permit showing all re -grading and revegetation, and the remaining trail access. 7. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy for new structures on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel, the Applicant shall submit a detailed debris flow mitigation plan prepared by a qualified professional engineer or geologist licensed in the State of Colorado to staff and the Colorado Geological Survey for review and approval. The plan shall incorporate any recommendations made by the Colorado Geological Survey. The approved mitigation plan shall be implemented prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy for new structures on the AFP. 8. With the building permit application for the residence on Homestead 9, the Applicant shall provide a site specific report from a qualified professional engineer or geologist licensed in the State of Colorado Resolution No.00 -2008 Page 4 addressing mitigation for potential debris flow. Required mitigation shall be implemented prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the residence. 9. With the access permit application for the driveway to Homestead 9, the Applicant shall provide engineered details for the bridge across Dry Woody Creek. If necessary, the Applicant shall also submit a floodplain development permit application. 10. The Applicant shall submit access permit applications for the relocation of the entry road and the new road to the upper bench (Homesteads 6 and 7 and Aspen Valley Downs Lots 6-9); the new roads shall comply with the Asset Management Plan and shall meet all fire department requirements regarding roadway width, adequate pullouts and turnarounds, and adequate access to dry hydrants. With the permit application for the entry road, the Applicant shall submit an earthmoving permit application to address the portion of the existing entry road to be reclaimed; the permit application shall show all re -grading and revegetation, and the remaining trail access. The trail shall be reviewed and approved by Open Space and Trails. 11. The Applicant shall submit an earthmoving permit application for improvements to the ditch on the lower pasture. With the permit application the Applicant shall demonstrate that this work will occur below the point where the blue line/intermittent streams shown on the USGS maps end (Red Canyon and Dry Woody Creek) to the satisfaction of the Environmental Health and Natural Resources Department. 12. Prior to submission of a floodplain development permit for bank stabilization and riparian restoration work adjacent to and above the Core area on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel (within the blue line/intermittent stream areas), the Applicant shall submit a riparian enhancement plan to the Environmental Health and Natural Resources and Community Development Departments for review and approval. No in -channel work is permitted, unless the Code is amended in the future. 13. Prior to issuance of building permits for the accessory structures with bathing facilities on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel, the Applicant shall record a covenant in a form acceptable to the County Attorney to ensure that the units are accessory to the common facilities on the AFP and will not contain kitchens. 14. The Ranch House on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel is exempt from growth management up to a maximum of 3,500 square feet of floor area. The Ranch House shall be used only for events hosted by the Association or individual homeowners at Aspen Valley Ranch, and shall not be used for commercial or other public events, including benefits. The Ranch House may contain a kitchen and bathrooms, but no bedrooms. 15. The total floor area on Aspen Valley Ranch shall not exceed 88,750 square feet. The maximum residential floor area per parcel shall be allocated as follows: A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. 1. 3. Homestead 1: Homestead 2: Homestead 3: Homestead 4: Homestead 5: Homestead 6: Homestead 7: Homestead 8: Homestead 9: Ranch House: 13,250 sf 5,750 sf 5,750 sf 5,750 sf 5,750 sf 10,750 sf 10,750 sf 12,750 sf 13,250 sf 3,500 sf Resolution No -2008 Page 5 16. The floor area on each of Lots 6-9 of Aspen Valley Downs shall be limited to a maximum of 13,250 square feet. Each lot is exempt from growth management for up to 5,750 square feet of floor area, with additional floor area up to 13,250 square feet available through growth management competition or the use of TDRs. 17. The Applicant shall comply with the following measures to mitigate impacts to wildlife (in addition to those included in Resolution No. 112-2005): A. Construction workers shall be prohibited from bringing dogs on -site during construction. B. Conti actors are required by the County Code to provide a bear proof container for all edible and food related trash. C. The hay storage structure on the Agricultural Facilities Parcel shall be game proof— side walls shall be constructed of 8' high solid siding or mesh fencing with gates of at least 7' in height. 18. Failure to comply with these conditions of approval may result in revocation of this permit or any subsequent permits related to this property or vested rights associated with this property. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY on the 9th day of December, 2007. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on the 23rd day of June, 2008. ATTEST: JlotPtG J Abk Jean4tte Jones, Clerk to t4 BOCC APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: aye 47kun��U�J� � r8 Community Development Director P166-07 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO By d ck Hatfield, Chairman PID #264305302001; 264305302002; 264305402001; 264305402602; 264308104001; 264304302001;264304302002; 264304302003; 264304201001; 264305300801 ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ MERRICK® & COMPANY McLaughlin Water Engineers A Division of Merrick & Company MERRICK McLAUGHLIN. 111 P AABC ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970-925-1920 970-925-1974 fax inweaspen@rofnet MEMORANDUM Date: November 2,2015 To: Pitkin County Environmental Health — From: G. Dean Derosier; McLaughlin Rincon, Ltd. RE: Aspen Valley Ranch ISIS Core Area # 2 Septic System o Recommendation of Final Approval PCEM Permit # 0033.2014/powt This Final Approval letter is written for the new septic system and the associated permit that serves the Aspen Valley Ranch's Core Area, including the Ranch House, Horse Barn, Historic Barn, Office, and Caretaker Unit. The system was designed, installed and placed into service in summer of 2015. PCEH and GOD inspected the installation of the system and found it was installed according to MWE design and PCEH requirements. This letter is to serve as the acceptance letter for MWE and recommendation to Pitkin County for final acceptance of the system. To my knowledge the system was installed according to MWE and PCEH standards and the system layout was installed per the November 2, 2015 asbuilt drawing, (attached). See Drawing for modification installed. The drawing is the asbuilt for system and permit Please call is you have any questions. G. Dean Derosier, P. E. Drawing NumDor. ISDS C2 Ql h HIm i. TQ era w I.OESICN. COD DETAIL COD 'ROJECT NUMBER CHECK. RCM 65+18201 DA1Er NOVEMBER 2015 ;3 19 \ •fri .zaN h Q PLAN AND DETAILS ISDS/OWS FOR ALL CORE AREA BUILNGS , , / - a\o J zt �e ;� sg z A? tu g f � Ei oo `% .� ® \f -�S; i r • -Si cf i CORE AREA 0 2 ADDf1ION ISDS/OWS SYSTEM t I iieJ 4 e� ' t _K(f: .icy t WhO k 1 [. \ I Q~ *A l 'whq c) en . cA C '--"- I 1 gL .1 h k ry l I p lInniii s bra aRI p R $ RI rEWP t4 t.; i I„Lit , •` ice° `` w 0Ka§& gip Pti g.i // ! P AR ORA .14 / gg ,' / a l' 0� ASPEN VALLEY RANCH PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO W^ Wei 2 2 25 PP. Kj rPt 44 C � ? /f ` i2� a r U 0 a qNq �g• C`'Qo % ,�t. 4 E b ), W eig .. ililb: D ` g6 -- Pitkin County Mail - RE: AVR Historic Barn Use Page 1 of 6 prei it I Mt COI' NT r i Kurt Dahl <kurt.dahl@pitkincounty.com> RE: AVR Historic Barn Use 1 message G Dean Derosier <mweaspen@rof.net> Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:26 AM To: Kurt Dahl <kurt.dahl@pitkincounty.com>, tom@npri.co Kurt We are still waiting on the resolution of the Historic Barn ISDS — Do you have an update? Please let us know the status so we may inform the client Thanks Dean G DEAN DEROSIER, PE MERRICK MCLAUGHLIN WATER ENGINEERS 111 P AABC ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970-925-1920 970-925-1974 (fax) MWEASPEN@ROF.NET Engineering I Architecture I Design -Build I Surveying I Planning 1 GeoSpatial Solutions https://nail. google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=23f7b56eb0&view=pt&q=mweaspen%40rof net&qs=true&... 10/13/2014 Pitkin County Mail - RE: AVR Historic Barn Use Page 2 of 6 Dim IMERR1CKt: MO 8 COMPANY McLaughlin Water Engineers A Ui. iL .—i of Merrick s 0cni my From: G Dean Derosier [mailto:mweaspen@rofnet] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:41 AM To: 'Kurt Dahl'; tom@npri.co Subject RE: AVR Historic Barn Use Kurt: Did you have any comments on these figures and the statement by the family on use? Is this what you are looking for? Let me know how I can help Dean From: G Dean Derosier [mailto:mweaspen@rofnet] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 1:28 PM To: 'Kurt Dahl'; tom@npri.co Subject AVR Historic Barn Use Kurt: This is from the Owners of AVR — It will be a family use only and not for clubhouse or wedding type uses. Based on this information I do not see it as a commercial uses and see the use as the following: Ranch House • ~3,500 square feet https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=23f7b56eb0&view=pt&q=mweaspen%40rof.net&qs=true&... 10/13/2014 Pitkin County Mail - RE: AVR Historic Barn Use Page 3 of 6 • Washer, Sink, Dish Washer and other Misc. uses — 85 GPD • Bar — 30 GPD • 3 employees at 20 GPD = 60 GPD • 20 people per day @30 GPD = 600 GPD • Average Flow is 775 GPD Historic Barn • Barn —Toilet, hand sink, mop sink, washing machine = 45 gpd • 2 — full baths — (24.8+ 14.7+8.4) X 2 = 95.8 gpd • Bar — hand sink, dish washer = 30 gpd • Average flow is Est flows 171 gpd z -c-or 0-Citc,d_st Please let Tom and I know if this is acceptable. Dean -�- sot UPS x►.5 S A (1/450 Co 0/47/ rh 1 n sly\ _claw :: 2ttr4-4-- Geb 4 2, ?call, APO o-(- ictz_5i9n From: Brooke Peterson [mailto.brooke.peterson@ajax-holdings.com] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 1.17 PM To: G Dean Derosier; 'Tom Newland'; ckees@dhmcarbondale.com; ghorn@rof.net Cc: Karim Souki, chris Souki Subject: RE: Talked to Kurt The facilities will not be rented out to third parties. They will be used for family and guests of the family The only horses on the Ranch will be our horses. The Ranch is not a horse boarding facility. The Ranch House is the gathering spot, not the historic barn. The Souki family itself should not exceed 25 people. I think it is fairly safe to say that the Historic Barn will always be used in conjunction with the Ranch House if there is a large family gathering, otherwise it is more of a locker room for when people are using the ATVs„ dirt bikes, and snowmobiles so they do not take the dirt into the homes etc. Regards, https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=23f7b56eb0&view=pt&q=mweaspen%40rof.net&qs=true&... 10/13/2014 Pitkin County Mail - RE: AVR Historic Barn Use Page 4 of 6 r 1.( ki /70/ /;.J, 4/\ HOI- DINCs 601 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 All Mail to: P.O Box 4068, Aspen, CO 81612 970-925-2619 (0) 970-544-0488 (F) 970-379-8259 (C) brooke.peterson@ajax-holclings.com From: G Dean Derosier [mailto:mweaspen@rof.net] Sent Friday, September 05, 2014 12:05 PM To: Tom Newland'; ckees@dhmcarbondale.com; ghorn@rof.net Cc: Karim Souki; chris Souki; Brooke Peterson Subject: RE: Talked to Kurt ALL ISDS (Septic) for Historic Barn and Ranch House In talking to Kurt at the PCEH, the real issue is what is the intended use of the Historic Barn. He sees it as a Commercial facility similar to the Ranch House, potential for a larger number of users in a party type event setting. He sees as a Clubhouse or locker room for Horse users renting pasture land from the family, or used for Weddings, dances, parties and could be rented out for other commercial uses. He sees even larger family gatherings of 20 to 25 or more people as a commercial type use. Would it be always used in conjunction with the Ranch House or separate If it was always used in conjunction with an event at the Ranch house we have already covered that in the Ranch house design sizing so we would not have to here. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=23f7b56eb0&view=pt&q=mweaspen%40rof.net&qs=true&... 10/13/2014 Pitkin County Mail -- RE: AVR Historic Barn Usc Page 5 of 6 If it's just locker room for family and friends or just used as a small party facility we may be able to get by with residential type uses, but that may be a hard sell. need to provide a summary of the intended uses and most likely those uses will be what it is limited to in the future. Sizing of the ISDS will be based upon the intended use so I can't really move forward until I can get that information. Thanks — Pls call with any questions Dean From: Tom Newland [mailto:tom@npri.co] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:09 AM To: Dean Derosier Cc: Jill Speed (jspeed@mfullerarchitects.com) Subject: Talked to Kurt Kurt says that we need to re -size the historic barn for the new "locker room" addition. Jill, could you send Dean copies of the floor plan so he can see the changes (new bathrooms, bar)? The sizing also need to be for commercial use, not residential. Also he said that we need to watch the flow maximum (2000 gals/day?) when sizing. Kurt said that he will call you today, Dean. Thanks Tom Newland, Newland Project Resources, Inc. PO Box 4825, 427 Original Road Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 927-4645(o) (97o) 618-9922(c) tom@npri.co https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=23f7b56eb0&view=pt&q=mweaspen%40rof.net&qs=true&... 10/13/2014 Pitkin County Mail - RE: AVR Historic Barn Use Page 6 of 6 « Please consider the environment before printing this email. No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2247 / Virus Database: 4015/7657 - Release Date: 09/05/14 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=23f7b56eb0&view=pt&q=mweaspen%40rof.net&gsrtrue&... 10/13/2014 `R,�PORI ,Oh\ WATER SY0 IbHkI] TIFCIFUNIIl`�J�AII t7 IIU�AJ`IAGI 11 IIAlL AND lhIINtI MCDi\tL Cat± Pti"-\C III) Y For the A S P IF NI VA D D ,INY RA ACC{ Conceptual] Water System Nan for Dorn es& Water PWSID # (To be issued by State) February, 2014 DOD BEE MERRICK° & COMPANY McLaughlin Water Engineers A Division Of Morick & Comport/ Merrick -McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd. 2420 Alcott Street Denver, Colorado 80211 Tel: +1 303-964-3333 Fax: +1 303-964-3355 www.merrick.com TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PROJECT SUMMARY 1 Introduction 1 Proposed Development and Water Requirements 1 Proposed Water System 3 Water Supply Wells 3 Treatment/Pump Station 3 Distribution System 3 Water Storage Tank 3 TECHNICAL CAPACITY 4 Source Water Adequacy 4 Source of Water Supply 4 Water Well Permits 4 Reliability of Water Source 4 Adequate Protection 4 100-Year Flood Plain 4 Infrastructure Adequacy Water Quality/SDWA Standards 5 Condition of Infrastructure 5 Technical Knowledge and Implementation 6 Operator Certification 6 Operator Responsibilities 6 Operation and Maintenance Program 7 MANAGERIAL CAPACITY 8 System Ownership 8 System Operation and Management 8 Startup and Operating Procedures 8 Routine Maintenance 9 Sampling and Analysis Program 9 Safety 9 Emergency Management Plan 9 Operation and Maintenance Manual 10 FINANCIAL CAPACITY 11 Capital and 0 & M Cost Responsibility 11 Credit Worthiness 11 Fiscal Management and Controls 11 ii FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1 Vicinity Map 3 Table 1 Well Raw Water Quality Test Results 5 APPENDICES A. Conceptual Water System Plan (PER) for Domestic Water System, Merrick — McLaughlin Engineers, February 2014 Well Completion Report, Resource Engineering, February 2014 C. Subsoil Study for Foundation Design of Proposed Water Storage Tank, HP Geotech, February, 2014 100-year Floodplain Certification and FEMA Mapping ATTACHMENTS 1. Construction Approval Flow Chart — Not Applicable 2. Drinking Water Design Submittal 3. County Health Contacts — Not Applicable 4. 100-year Flood Plain Certification — See Appendix D 5. Public Drinking Water System Inventory Forms 6. Chemical/MPA Analysis — Not Applicable, in Report (Appendix A) 7. Financial Spreadsheet — Not Applicable iii PROJECT SUMMARY Introduction This Report on Water System Technical, Managerial and Financial Capacity contains information concerning the proposed domestic potable water system to be constructed for the Aspen Valley Ranch development, in Pitkin County. This Report is being submitted to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) in accordance with the requirements of the capacity development program per CRS §25-1--107, for its review and approval, to allow the Owner of this development, Aspen Valley Ranch AH LLC (ARV AH LLC), to proceed with construction and operation of the community water system. The Owners have directed that the water system be designed to accommodate more than 25 full-time residents. Therefore the system is to be managed as a Community Water System; this Report is submitted in accordance with CDPHE's New Water System Capacity Planning Manual. Proposed Development and Water Requirements The Aspen Valley Ranch contains approximately 900 acres, located in Pitkin County on the right bank of the Roaring Fork River, as shown on Drawing 1 of the Preliminary Engineering Report (PER), Appendix A. It is proposed to develop this Ranch for low density residential use. The system will serve less than 15 service connections (of any type), consisting of nine homesteads, a barn, club house, swimming pool building and the existing ranch center. System peak day potable water demands are estimated to be: o In Building o Irrigation o Fire Protection 11,150 gpd 32,000 gpd 1,200 gpm (all residences with sprinklers) A detailed breakdown of estimated water uses is presented in the Conceptual Water System Plan (Plan) included with this Report, as Appendix A. 1 Vicinity Map Figure 1 2 Proposed Water System The proposed treated water distribution system will include two wells, two booster pumps, disinfection, storage, distribution piping and fire hydrants. The overall system is illustrated and described on Drawing 1 in the attached Plan. Key system components are summarized following: Water Supply Wells Two wells will be drilled into the Roaring Fork Alluvium. Each well will have a sustainable capacity of 40 to 50 gpm. The water will be delivered to the treatment/pump station for disinfection using chlorination and UV treatment. The wells were located, designed, and tested by Resource Engineering. Their report and water quality analyses are included as Attachment B (also Table 1 in the PER). Treatment/Pump Station. The treatment/pump station will meter and deliver treated water to the distribution system using two 50 gpm high service pumps. A minimum pressure greater than 45 psi will be provided to all home sites. The station will also house the disinfection equipment and all electrical and controls. Distribution System. Water will be distributed via 10-inch, 8-inch and 4-inch mains, with all fire hydrants served by 6-inch branch lines. A 10-inch supply line will connect the distribution system to the water storage tank. As shown on Drawing 1 of the Plan, the higher elevation distribution 10-inch line will be looped for improved hydraulics and reliability. Due to the elevation difference of the development, some homesteads will require service line pressure reducing valves. Water Stora•e Tank. The water storage tank will be buried concrete and have a capacity of approximately 160,000 gallons. It will provide for operational storage, fire flow demands, and emergency storage. The tank is to be fitted with a hydraulic mixer, and operated so as to reduce average residence time and avoid stratification. Level controls will be included to control filling from the supply wells, with an overflow pipe in case of overfilling. Refer to Appendix C for the geotechnical investigation report detailing the site of the proposed tank. 3 TECHNICAL CAPACITY SOURCE WATER ADEQUACY Source of Water Supply The proposed development will be served by two wells, designed and located by Resource Engineering. Resource has addressed all necessary water rights issues and permitting. Table 1 in the Plan shows the raw water quality testing results of the wells, and is also included later in this Section. Reliability of Water Source Testing has shown that each well can supply a sustained flow of 40 to 50 gpm. See Appendix B. Adequate Protection The ground around the well heads is to be graded to drain away from the well so as to minimize the potential for surface water contamination. Cement grout was placed to seal the well casing pipe in accordance with State criteria. The well heads are adequately protected with a sanitary seal with (locking cap) located at least one foot above the ground surface at the well. There is no evidence of surface contamination of the well water from the water quality analyses that have been completed. The water level is over 73 feet from the surface and the wells are located over 500 ft. from the Roaring Fork River. The storage tank will be a 160,000 gallon completely buried concrete tank with secured access. Screens will be placed over the ventilation openings and overflow discharges, and frost -proof dampers will be installed in the air vents. In case of power failure or other emergency, the tank will be able to provide almost two weeks of in -building supply during non -irrigation periods. The booster pumping and chlorination equipment is to be located in a secured structure. Typically, the pumps will operate in a lead -lag fashion, providing a backup in case one pump is not operational. Sampling points are to be included in the treatment/pump station to monitor water quality. Provisions in the design will allow for a backup generator to be added in the future. 100-Year Flood Plain None of the water supply facilities are located in a 100-year flood plain. A FEMA map of well and pump station locations in relation to the 100 year flood plain is included along with the "100-Year Flood Plain Certification" in Appendix D. 4 INFRASTRUCTURE ADEQUACY Water Quality The Preliminary Report was prepared prior to receiving the well water quality test results. The results show that the raw water meets all State/EPA primary standards for inorganic chemicals. Results for this well, as well as comparable qualities previously determined for the Red Canyon Spring, for items of concern, follow: Well Raw Water Quality Test Results Contaminant Sodium Sulfate Nitrate Hardness New Well 5 mg/I 53 mg/I 0.5 mg/I __J None Red Canyon Spring 3 mg/I _ 48 ma/I 230 mg/I L160 mg/I Standard 250 mg/I 10 mg/I Recommend 100 mg/I These results indicate minimal influence of Aspen or other upstream wastewaters (essentially a "virgin" supply). Hardness is of concern; there are no known health relationships — only with washing, bathing difficulty and plumbing encrustation. The EPA value for hardness is not mandatory or enforced. Note that it is not practicable to reduce hardness at the central plant since the system is to provide irrigation water — at relatively high demand rates. It is likely each customer's service will include a water softener for in -home water use (not including the fire suppression system). Condition of Infrastructure There is no existing water system infrastructure (except one new well). All components of the water system are to be new and are to be designed in accordance with CDPHE requirements and constructed by skilled contractors under the inspection of the system Owner, AVR AH LLC, and its engineering representatives. Disinfection of both wells, storage tank, equipment and pipelines will be in accordance with American Water Works Association standards as required by the contract documents for the various projects — and in accordance with design drawings and specifications approved by CDPHE 5 TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLEMENTATION Operator Certification Per Certification of Water Treatment Plant and Wastewater Treatment Plant Operators, as amended 1996, Article 9 of Title 25, Part 100.8.2 the system, being of a capacity of less than 2 mgd and using groundwater with no additional treatment beyond chlorine disinfection, is anticipated to be a Class D facility. The system is required to be operated under the direct responsibility of a Class D certified plant operator. Operator Responsibilities The operator's responsibilities will include the following: © Check of residual chlorine concentrations at the treatment/pump station and at the far end of the distribution system. Monitor amounts of hypochlorite on site and arrange for required deliveries from the chemical supplier. © Compliance monitoring, reporting and record keeping. Collect samples and arrange for annual water quality analyses. • Monitor service pressures, water meters, and tank and well water levels. ® Track equipment run times and perform regularly scheduled preventative maintenance. ® Maintain appropriate spare parts on site for critical equipment. ® Arrange for and oversee contractor services when needed. • Operate distribution system valves in the event of a pipeline break or leak. Arrange for a pipeline contractor to affect repairs. ® Assist with locating buried distribution system pipelines for excavation contractors. ® Respond to alarm conditions and arrange for appropriate corrective actions. • Communicate with AVR AH LLC administration regarding equipment and support needs. Qualified maintenance personnel will be contracted with to assist the operator with major equipment overhaul and with electrical/control problems. AVR AH LLC will make arrangements with a local pipeline contractor to make emergency repairs to distribution pipeline breaks. 6 Operation and Maintenance Program AVR AH LLC representatives will compile manufacturer's literature describing in detail procedures for the proper maintenance and installation of major equipment. This information will be assembled in three-ring binders along with a written description of the operation procedures of the facilities. Two copies of each O&M Manual are to be compiled; with one to be maintained at the treatment/pump station and one at the AVR AH LLC office (Ranch Center). 7 MANAGERIAL PLAN System Ownership The water rights, water supply wells, storage tank, treatment/pumping station building, distribution piping, and all other appurtenant facilities and assets, including associated property rights are owned or directly controlled by Aspen Valley Ranch AH LLC. It is responsible for The design and construction of all wholesale water system facilities. The responsibility for the water system management and operation will initially belong to the ARV AH-I LLC, and it will obtain the services of a certified plant operator for the day to day management and operation. ARV AH LLC will assume full responsibility after a sufficient number of houses have been constructed to support the administrative responsibilities and costs of the system ARV AH LLC responsibilities will include water usage accounting, billing, and payment of system operating expenses (e.g., electrical, insurance, laboratory, contract operator fees, etc.). (No meters are being installed?) It will also be responsible for compliance with the requirements of regulatory agencies for items such as safety, building codes building permits, etc., as specified by 3.1 of the Design Criteria for Potable Water Systems. The responsibility for the maintenance of disinfection residuals and sample collection as required by the Colorado Primary Drinking Water Regulations will be that of the system operator. The operator and ARV AH LLC are expected to obtain the services of qualified electricians, plumbers, pump installers, and equipment service organizations as may be required to assist with maintenance of the system. System Operation and Management As noted previously, it is anticipated that the system will be a Class D facility and operated under the direct responsibility of a minimum Class D certified plant operator. Startup and Operating Procedures Prior to the beginning of system operations, the tank and pipeline contractor will disinfect the system to AWWA specifications as defined in the Design Criteria for Potable Water Systems. A 10% sodium hypochlorite solution will be mixed with water in the chemical feed pump solution tank. The initial mixture will contain ten gallons of water for each gallon of 10% sodium hypochlorite. The chemical feed pumps will be primed and connected to the injectors. Each well pump control will, in turn, be switched to the on or manual position and the operation of the well and chlorinator will be verified. The chlorine in the supply line to the tank will be monitored. The stroke and frequency controls will be adjusted on each chemical feed pump to obtain a 1.5 mg/I total chlorine reading. The pump controls will then be set to automatic operation and the pumps will alternate at each pump cycle. 8 A log of well water meter readings, chemical feeder settings, chlorine solution concentration and solution tank levels will be kept. After the tank has filled, the shutdown of the pumps and chlorinators will be verified. The pressure pump controls will be switched to automatic operation and the operation verified. Pressure pump cut - in and cutout pressures will be adjusted to provide adequate system pressure. System hydrants will be flushed and chlorine residuals monitored at the remote ends of the system. The contract operator is expected to be present at the start-up of the water system and will perform the items noted in Startup and Operating Procedures above. As -built drawings and equipment manuals will be available on site. Routine Maintenance Operation and maintenance will include regular chlorine residual monitoring in the distribution system. Logs of water production, hypochiorite usage, and operational changes will be kept by the operator. Hypochlorite solution tanks will be refilled as required. System maintenance will include annual flushing of fire hydrants and lubrication of pumps as specified by the equipment manufacturers. Chemical feed pump suction lines, discharge lines and injectors will be serviced and/or replaced as necessary to provide for proper flow of the sodium hypochiorite solution. Sampling and Analysis Program A water sampling and analysis program consistent with the Colorado Primary Drinking Water Regulations and directives from the Water Quality Control Division will be instituted when a PWSID is assigned. Safety NIOSH compliant protective devices including gloves and a face shield will be provided in the treatment/pump station due to the sodium hypochiorite being stored. The local fire department will be notified of the chemicals used or stored onsite. Emergency Management Plan In the event of an emergency, ARV AH LLC or its designated representative will contact the system operator. The operator and the ARV AH LLC representative will discuss the emergency and decide on a course of action. The ARV AH LLC in cooperation with the operator would obtain the services of leak detection, water line excavation, plumbing and/or electrical contracting organizations, as needed. In the event of a major water line leak, the operator would consult the as -built system drawings and close the appropriate system valves to limit system water loss until the leak is repaired. 9 During the peak month of usage at full build -out and no reduction in irrigation, the 160,000 gallons of storage tank capacity can supply water to the system for approximately 2 days without additional water from the wells. No standby generator is envisioned during the initial system design; however provisions to add a generator will be incorporated into the system design such that the ARV AH LLC could quickly and economically add a generator if it determines there is a need. Operations and Maintenance Manual An operations and maintenance manual, following the minimum outline from the State of Colorado New Water System Capacity Planning Manual, will be completed and made available to the water system administrator, Owner and to the certified water treatment plant operator. The manual will be completed and placed in service within three months after receiving a PWSID. 10 FINANCIAL CAPACITY Capital and 0 & flli Cost Responsibility All capital costs for construction of the water system facilities are being borne by the developer, ARV AH LLC on a cash basis (no debt). It will also cover the full costs of operating and maintaining the system. The ARV AH LLC will have the ability to finance the expected annual costs to operate and maintain the system. Credit Worthiness The ARV AH LLC is financially healthy. It has access to private capital sources to finance the water facilities. Fiscal Management and Controls This is to be a privately owned system, serving only customers related to the ARV AH LLC. No form of water service charges or tap fees are contemplated. 11 STATE OF COLORADO John W. Hickenlooper, Governor Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 Phone (303) 692-2000 Located in Glendale, Colorado www.colorado.gov/cdphe May 23, 2014 Brooke Peterson, Owner Aspen Valley Ranch, AH LLC 514 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 RE• Request for Information; Drinking Water Plans Submittal Aspen Valley Ranch, AH LLC, Aspen Valley Ranch Potable Water System Public Water System Identification (PWSID) No. CO0149124, Pitkin County Dear Mr. Peterson: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (Department), Water Quality Control Division has received and reviewed the plans and specifications, dated March 4, 2014 for the Aspen Valley Ranch, AH LLC, Aspen Valley Ranch Potable Water System. Because the Aspen Valley Ranch does not meet, or will not soon meet, the definition of a public water system as defined by Section 11.3(57) of the Colorado Primary Dr inking Water Regulations (Regulation 11), the Department does not have the authority by Regulation 11 to approve or deny the plans and specifications for construction of the water system. However, the Department performed a preliminary review of the plans and specifications to determine general compliance with the requirements of the State of Colorado Design Criteria For Potable Water Systems (Design Criteria). At the time Aspen Valley Ranch meets, or would soon meet, the definition of a public water system, final plans and specification for the water system must be submitted to the Department for review and approval in accordance with Sections 11.4(1)(a) and (b). The Department will conduct a review of the submittal (i.e., plans, specifications, capacity assessment) in accordance with the requirements of Regulation 11 and the Design Criteria in effect at that time. The proposed public water system design does not meet the requirements of the Design Criteria and the review process for this project has been placed on hold because of the following issues: 1. According to Section 1.2.3(a) of the Design Criteria, the submittal requires water quality data to be collected or existing data summarized to either confirm the quality of a new source or to justify the selection of a treatment process. For each new groundwater source, a raw water analysis for all applicable MCL parameters for which the supplier of water is responsible for maintaining compliance must be submitted, with at least two full sample sets in different calendar quarters (four quarters of data are recommended). The submittal appears to have included one set of sample results from the proposed aquifer, and the sample results do not appear to include all the required raw water chemical analyses. Please provide two full sets of sample results from different calendar quarters to complete the raw water analysis (for each well if drawing water from different depths). Community systems are required to submit the following raw water chemical analyses: inorganics, nitrate, nitrite, sodium, corrosivity (temperature, pH, alkalinity, calcium, and TDS or conductivity), radioactivity, and organics. Brooke Peterson, Aspen Valley Ranch DW Design Review — Request for additional information May 23, 2014 Page 2 of 4 2. Section 1.2.5(a) of the Design Criteria requires that the system demonstrate adequate water rights and permits through the Office of the State Engineer, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources (DWR). The engineering report indicates there will be two wells with a capacity of 40-50 gpm each. However, only one well permit was provided, and the permit author rzed the use of the well to monitoring water levels and/or water quality sampling. To confirm the system has adequate water rights and permits, please provide additional information for the two wells, including the well log and the appropriate permit/application for each of the wells. 3. According to Section 1.2.5(d) of the Design Criteria, for new and updated pumping installations, supporting pump curves and limitations to provide adequate pumping capacity must be piovided. The engineering report indicates the pump station will meter and deliver treated water to the distribution system (including the finished water storage tank) using two 50 gpm centrifugal pumps. To check that the proposed pumps can supply adequate capacity at peak demands against the required distribution system pressure, please provide the system head curve, head computations for design conditions of the pumping system, and pump curves. 4. According to Section 1.2.5(b)(i) of the Design Criteria, identification of treatment goals including regulatory compliance requirements and process goals must be specified in the engineering report. The design proposes to utilize an ultraviolet (UV) reactor for additional disinfection treatment; however, no design parameters or calculations were provided for the UV treatment unit. Please specify if the UV unit will be used for regulatory compliance, and if so, please provide the additional information needed to review the UV unit for compliance with the design criteria listed in Section 4.4.9 of the Design Criteria. 5. In accordance with Section 2.10 of the Design Criteria, sample taps must be provided so that water samples can be obtained from each water source and from appropriate locations in each operating treatment unit and from the finished water. Based on the drawings, no taw water sample taps are provided for the wells. Please provide additional information, such as updated drawings, indicating that raw water sample taps will be provided. 6. According to Section 4.4.1.7 of the Design Criteria, the chlorine solution injector/diffuser must be compatible with the point of application to provide a rapid and thorough mix with all the water being treated. The drawings indicate that the chlorine feed discharges into the clearwell. This type of application does not seem to provide efficient mixing. Please provide technical information on the application of the chlorine feed point to assure dispersion and thorough mixing of the chlorine within the clearwell. In addition, please specify the location of the chemical feed point for each well as the detail provided in the drawings indicates a single feed line. 7. In accordance with Section 4.4.2.c of the Design Criteria, groundwater systems must be designed for the capability to provide 4-log virus inactivation. Based on information in the submittal, the system has elected to perform triggered source water monitoring with the capability to provide 4-log inactivation of viruses in the event of a triggered source water event. The submittal package did not appear to provide disinfection calculations demonstrating the capability to achieve 4-log reduction/inactivation of viruses for the treatment facility. The calculation provided calculates the detention time provided in the serpentine contact tank (clearwell). Please provide chlorine contact time calculations that demonstrate the capability to achieve 4-log reduction/inactivation of viruses, accounting for the system's peak flow demand, minimum contact time volume with the appropriate baffling factor, pH, and minimum water temperature. 8. In accordance with Section 5.1.1.a of the Design Criteria, where a chemical feed is necessary for the protection of the supply including chlorination, coagulation and other processes required by regulatory requirements (e.g., pH adjustment for lead and copper compliance), a standby unit or a combination of units of sufficient size to meet capacity must be provided to replace the largest unit when out of service, and the Department may require that more than one be installed. The Department understands a sodium Brooke Peterson, Aspen Valley Ranch DW Design Review — Request for additional information A4ay 23, 2014 Page 3 of 4 hypochlorite feed pump will be provide for each well; however, please discuss how the system will meet the standby unit requirement. 9. In accordance with Section 5.1.2 of the Design Criteria, feeders may be manually or automatically controlled, with automatic controls being designed so as to allow override by manual controls, and proportioned to flow. The submittal indicates the chlorine dosing rate is fixed injection adjusted to maintain a 1.5 mg/1 fiee chlorine residual; however, the design does not discuss how the chemical feed pumps will be controlled (e.g., activated via pressure switch) and how the chemical feed rate is proportioned to flow. Please discuss how the chemical feed pumps will be controlled, and how the chemical feed rates will be determined. 10. In accordance with Section 5.1.10 of the Design Criteria, storage tanks for liquid chemicals must be specified for use with individual chemicals. The Department understands sodium hypochlorite will be used for disinfection; however no equipment specifications were provided for the chemical storage tank. Please provide information pertaining to the sodium hypochlorite feed tank including volume, material, cover, and secondary containment. 11. Section 7.0.6.a of the Design Criteria requires adequate controls be provided for tank turn over to maintain water quality. Control design must facilitate turnover of water in the finished water storage tank to minimize stagnation and/or stored water age. The design indicates the 160,000 gallon buried concrete storage tank will be fitted with a hydraulic mixer, and operated to reduce the average residence time of the finished water. To check that the stored water age will be managed appropriately, please pi ovide a description demonstrating how the system will plan to manage the water quality in the finished water storage tank. Water storage management for water quality must take into account influent water quality, retention of fire flow, demand management, as well as factors specific to the design and operation of the tank such as fluctuation of the water levels in the storage tank for complete water turnover. 12. In accordance with Section 7.0.7.a of the Design Criteria, all storage structures must be provided with an overflow. The serpentine contact tank (clearwell) does not appear to be constructed with a tank overflow. Please update the design/drawings to include an overflow. 13. In accordance with Section 7.0.7.h of the Design Criteria, the top of the overflow must be a minimum of one foot below the lowest point of the roof structure. Based on the information provided, the separation distance from the underside of the roof of the 160,000 gallon buried concrete storage tank and the top of the inlet of the overflow is 0.83 feet. Please update the design/drawings to provide the minimum of one foot of separation between the top of the overflow and the lowest point of the roof structure. 14. In accordance with Section 7.0.8 of the Design Criteria, finished water storage structures must be designed with reasonably convenient access to the interior for cleaning and maintenance, and at least two access openings must be provided above the waterline at each water compartment. The 160,000 gallon buried concrete storage tank appears to have one access point to the tank. Please update the design to include two access points to the interior of the tank for cleaning and maintenance as required by this criteria. As stated in this Section of the Design Criteria, each access opening must be elevated at least 24 inches above the top of the tank or ground surface and be fitted with a solid water and insect tight cover which overlaps a framed opening and extends down around the frame. The frame must be at least four inches high. Each cover must be hinged on one side, and must have a locking device. Brooke Peterson, Aspen Valley Ranch DW Design Review — Request for additional information May 23, 2014 Page 4 of 4 Please submit a written response to this letter that addresses the identified issues. The review is on hold and will proceed upon receipt of the information listed above. Please direct any further correspondence regarding the plans and specifications/design review to: Paul Kim, P.E. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division — Engineering Section 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 Thank you for your time and cooperation in this matter. Please contact me by telephone at 303-692-3279 or by electionic mail at paul.kim@state.co.us state.co.us if you have any questions. Sincerely, 7en Digitally signed by Paul Kim, P.E. / / DN: cn=Paul Kim, P.E., o, ou, email=paul.kim@state.co.us, c=US Date: 2014.05.23 06:41:00-06'00' Paul Kim, P.E. Senior Review Engineer Engineering Section Water Quality Control Division Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment cc: Ronald C McLaughlin, Merrick & Company Kurt Dahl, Pitkin County Environmental Health Doug Camrud, WQCD ES Engineering Review Unit Manager Drinking Water File C00149124 Colorado Dcpai Unc of Public J (cuitir rtnd Envir ntttcnt /\Pt-»NF'lDIX it: [tIlI r rfl[)Ia Drinking Water Design Submittal COVER PAW'. BASIC INFO 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, 132 Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 (:1)19-I1.111►(.i1 1(11:c,Vi(W(rt)ftato.c:O.rr. 303-692,6298 A. Project and System Information — System Name Aspen Valley Ranch Potable Water System Project Title Water Supply_and Structures •• Schedule 1 _ County Pitkin PWSID New System Owner Aspen Valley Ranch, AI -I I.I.0 Representative Mr, I3rooke Peterson, Ajax Holdings 514 E. Hyman Ave Address Aspen, CO 81611 Email brooke.peterson jajax-holdings.com Phone 970-925-2619 Fax 1970-544-0488 - Signatures _ of System Representatives Role Date Typed Name Signature Owner 03-24-14 Brooke Peterson .` `•, • 1J ' • The owner is an individual, corporation, partnership, association, state or political subdivision thereof, municipality, or other lega entity. Applicant Representative /System legal 03-24-14 I Brooke Peterson the board, system public legal works representative director). The is the Designer legally responsible or Consulting agent Engineer and decision•making is not the legal representative. at thority for a public water system (e.g. mayor, president of a Directions: Prior to submission to the CDPI-IE (Department), the construction application must be signed by the Owner and/or a System Legal Representative. The Department expects the public water system to send a duplicate copy to the local County Health authority or County Commissioner (if no County Health authority) in whose jurisdiction(s) the drinking water facility is to be located Signature is not required from the county. I was the engineer in responsible charge for (identify portions of work) System Design - Pumping/Treatment Station Storage Tank during the preparation of the basis of design report for the above -referenced project To the best of my knowledge, the design is consistent with the most recent published version of the Design Criteria for Potable Water Systems, and that all site -specific deviations requests are listed in this report Ronald C. McLaughlin March 24, 2014 Typed Name of Professional Engineer ()ate Signed 2871 Signature of Professional Engineer License fl Revised Nov 2013 P.E. Stamp and Signature Drinking Water Design Application Form Page 1 of 17 March 4, 2014 Mr. Bret Icenogle Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, B2 Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 009 MERRICK o ❑00 & COMPANY McLaughlin Water Engineers A niv.c:on of MCaick E. Company McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd 2420 Alcott Street Denver, Colorado 80211 Tel: +1 303-964-3333 Fax: +1 303-964-3355 www.merrick.com RE: ASPEN VALLEY RANCH POTABLE WATER SYSTEM Dear Mr. Icenogle: Submitted attached is our Preliminary Engineering Report and the TMF Capacity Manual, prepared in accordance with CDPHE Regulations. This is the small system, located in the Roaring Fork Valley of Pitkin County. It will be a privately owned system, with service limited to the Ranch units. As discussed with you, the Owners decided it is best to apply as a community water system since there is a possibility of having more than 25 continuing residents. They would like to start construction early this Spring — since the construction period it Pitkin County is not long. Your early review would be appreciated; please call if you have questions or need additional information. Respectfully submitted, McLaughlin Water Engineers A Division of Merrick & Company Ronald C. McLaughlin, PE and LS Enclosure cc: Brooke Peterson, with Enclosure Dean Derosier C:\Users\DeanD\Documents\DOCUMENTS\MiscClients165418147 07-14.01 Aspen Wiley Ranch\Central System\PER Report Trans to CDPHE.docx APPENDIX D Large Scale Construction Management Plan for: Address 80 Aspen Valley Ranch Lane, Woody Creek, CO Parcel ID Number 264305300801 Permits Applied for: Check all that apply. Demolition Permit X Building Permit Access Permit X Earthmoving Permit X Floodplain Permit ROW Permit Property Owner's Name AVR AH LLC (970) 925-2619 Name Phone Number Owner's Representative's Name: Tom Newland Name Contractor's Name: 927-4645 tom@npri.co Phone Number Email Kaegebein Fine Homebuilding 379-6228 Name natekaegebein@ldhomebuilding.co Phone Number Email 1.8.10 APPENDIX D DESCRITION OF WORK Place Ranch House - residential space. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PLAN Notify adjacent property owners of construction activities via post. DATES OF CONSTRUCTION June 1, 2014 - October 1, 2015 HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION 7:00 am and 7:00 pm, Monday through Saturday, no work Sundays and federally designated holidays. HOW WILL EXCAVATED SOIL BE USED? Excess material will be hauled off -site. ATTACHMENTS: The following items shall be included as attachments: ➢ Vicinity Map > Project Sign ➢ Contact List > Site Plan(s) Showing: 1. Disturbance Area 2. Revegetation Plan 3. Construction Fencing 4. Emergency Vehicle Access S. Construction Parking 6. Staging Areas 7. Trailers, material storage, waste management, etc. > Sequencing Schedule ➢ Traffic Control and Emergency Access Plan > Revegetation Plan > Fugitive Dust Control Plan VOC�ONOiY MAP t WAisoN D •RD Triangle Peak • GERBAZ,WY, PROJECT SIGN 2Cfl ,y 1)1 C= roy r 1Cr_' ID DUI DENG "LRA/LIT Mcxxx02 140xxxx [aie b o in' HOrrchu. -g J r (910) XX)(=XXX)C ti rner__genc Phore „�UT D r (74]-[ours (9'/C)XXXcXXX)( Charlie Mountain Earthmoving Permit Cover Letter Page 22 CON] ACT LIST Physical Address SPID #264305300801 20 Lane, 81656 Aspen Woody Valley Creek, Ranch CO Owner AVR AH LLC 51.4 CO E. 81611 Aspen, Hyman, Contractor Kaegebein Fine 101 Aspen, Oak CO Ridge 81611 Dr. 379-6228 Homebuilding Civil Engineer SGM 118 Glenwood 81601 West 6th, Springs, Suite 200 CO (970) 945-1004 Landscape Architect DHM Design 311 Carbondale, Main Street, CO St 81623 102 963-6520 Permit Expeditor Surveyor Newland Resources Project P.O. Basalt, Box 4815 CO 81621 (970) 927-4645 SGM 118 Glenwood 81601 West 6th, Springs, Suite 200 CO (970) 945-1004 Land Consultant Use Davis Associates 215 #104 Aspen, S. Monarch CO 81611 (970) 925-6587 Horn Charlie Mountain Earthmoving Permit Cover Letter Page 23 Pitkin County Revegetation Report Jobsite Address 80 Aspen Valley Ranch Lane, Woody Creek, CO Parcel # 264305300801 Property Owner & Mailing Address. AVR AH LLC 514 E. Hyman Ave., Aspen, CO 81611 Applicant Name & Mailing Address: Tom Newland PO Box 4815, Basalt, CO 81621 Phone Number: 925-2619 Phone Number: 927-4645 Seeding Method See attached landscaping plan. Seed Rate (lbs PLS/acre) Approx Area Covered 153,800 (3.5 acres) Pitkin County pre -approved Seed Mix (circle one): (see Pitkin County Land Management Website at http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/64/PCseedmix.pdf for seed mix contents and breakdowns) Pitkin County Irrigated Seed Mix Pitkin County Non -Irrigated Seed Mix Pitkin County Beneficial Browse Mix Dryland Pasture/Old Hay Fields Mix Other Seed Mix (subject to approval by Pitkin County Land Management): Common Name Scientific Name % of Mix Please see attached landscaping plan. I NOTE! All seed MUST be Certified, blue -tagged seed, and must be free of Colorado I I listed noxious weed species. This certifies that seed meets high purity and germination I standards and has a low weed content. Pitkin County Land Management may request I from the applicant the Blue Tags which are removed from seed bags before mixing. I Applicants should ask the seed vendor to provide these tags with the seed purchase. Mulch Type See attached landscaping plan. Mulch Rate (lbs/acre) Tackifier/Tacking Method Estimated Date Started 3/15/14 Estimated Date Finished 12/31/17 Applicant Signature Comments: Questions? For more information on revegetation methods, seed mixes, and local contacts, please see the Pitkin County Revegetation Guide, located at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/64/revegguide.pdf You may also contact Crystal Yates -White at Pitkin County Land Management: (970)-920-5214 crystalyw@co.pitkrn.co.us PITKIN COUNTY FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN Property Owner(s): AVR AH LLC Property Address: 80 Aspen Valley Ranch Lane Zip Code: 81656 Parcel ID: Contact Person: Email Address: Woody Creek, CO 81656 264305300801 Tom Newland Phone Number: 927-4645 tom@npri.co Fax Number: 927-0196 Describe the development activity: Place debric flow mitigation, two bridges, utilities and revegetation Total area of land in project: 735 Acres Date earthmoving will commence: 3/15/04 Stop: 12/31/07 Total area subject to earthmoving: 3.5 Acres Total disturbed area at any one time. 10 Acres Area to be paved (roads, parking 0 Acres lots): Date paving will be completed: - Estimated time to complete entire project (includes buildings) List any known or suspected contaminates in the soil: 24 to 30 months Check the dust control measures which you propose to implement: I. Control of Unpaved Roads on Site Watering ❑ Frequent (Watering frequency of 2 or more times per day) SI As needed Application of Chemical Stabilizer Vehicle Speed Control Speeds limited to 5 MPH maximum. Speed limit signs must be posted. (Generally 30 mph is maximum approvable speed on site.) Gravelling II. Control of Disturbed Surface Areas on Site 0 0 12 Watering ❑ Frequent (Watering frequency of 2 or more times per day) As needed Application of Chemical Stabilizer Covering Large Mounds of Soil Exposed for >24 Hrs Vehicle Speed Control Speeds limited to 5 MPH maximum. Speed limit signs must be posted. Revegetation Seeding with mulch ❑ Seeding without mulch Furrows at right angle to prevailing wind F1 Depth of furrows Inches (must be greater than 6") 9-19-06 1 Compaction Of Disturbed Soil On A Daily Basis To Within 90 % Of Maximum Compaction (As determined by a Proctor Test). ❑ Foundation areas only ❑ All disturbed soil. ❑ Wind Breaks Type: (E.g., snow fence, silt fence) Synthetic Or Natural Cover For Steep Slopes. Type: netting, blankets (E.g., netting, mulching) III. Prevention Of Mud And Dirt Carried Out Onto Paved Surfaces. V1 Prevention 0 Gravel Entry Ways Washing Vehicle Wheels 0 Other: Cleanup of Paved Areas Street Sweeper ❑ Hose With Water ❑ Other: List Any Other Control Methods: Frequency: as needed Times Per Day Signature of Person Responsible for Implementing Plan: Date Tom Newland for Jon Evans Project Manager Name (please print) Title Submit this form to: Pitkin County Environmental Health & Natural Resources 0405 Castle Creek Rd., Suite 10 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970.920.5070 Fax: 970.920.5077 www.aspenpitkin.com/ehnr FOR COUNTY USE ONLY: Approved Denied By: 9-19-06 2 \\I VA =,.,Y ANICE Pi,d n County, Collorad Conceptual Water System Plan for Domestic Water System ■ ■ ■ Submitted by: ,,• MERRICK® p 8t COMPANY McLaughlin Water Engineers ■ ■ A DIVISION OF MERRICK & COMPANY 2420 Alcott Street Denver, CO 80211 Tel: 303-964-3333 Fax: 303-964-3355 www.merrick.com 65418291 January 2014 1/4 1/4 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Aspen Valley Ranch contains approximately 900 acres, located in Pitkin County on the right bank of the Roaring Fork River, as shown on Drawing 1. It is proposed to develop this Ranch for low density residential use. Planned buildings include: Homestead 1— 2 Employee Units equipment building Homestead 2 — Large (5,750 s.f.) residence 4 to 5 bedroom Homestead 3 — Large (5,750 s.f.) residence 4 to 5 bedroom Homestead 4 — Large (5,750 s.f.) residence 4 bedroom Homestead 5 — Large (5,750 s.f.) residence 4 to 5 bedroom Homestead 6 — Large (10,750 s.f.) residence 4 to 5 bedroom Homestead 7 — Large (10,750 s.f.) residence 4 to 5 bedroom Homestead 8 — Extra Large (rz: 12,750 s.f.) residence, 10 bedroom Homestead 9 - Extra Large (= 12,750 s.f.) residence, 5 to 10 bedroom possible Existing Ranch Center (caretaker unit, small office, Historic horse barn) Barn (with 1 bathroom) Club House — 3,500 s.f. no bedrooms, kitchen and 2 full bath Swimming Pool building locker rooms and kitchen Each of the above points of use is to be supplied with potable water. Potable water is also to be made available for limited building envelope irrigation. The system will serve less than 15 service connections (of any type). It is assumed that all residences will be second homes — with no year-round residents. An exception to this is the accomodations for full-time staff. The full-time staff, with dependents, will be less than 15 persons. Therefore, this proposed water utility is expected to be classified as non -community system, in accordance with the CDPHE New Water System Capacity Planning Manual. 65418291 °o Hold MERRICK" Aspen Valley Ranch & COMPANY McLaughlin McLaughlin Wider Engle -item A OM*"I of Menkk A (:urn p. y 16. op Ilk WATER QUALITY Following are summary quality characteristics for the different uses. Potable — In -Building Potable quality, good taste, no color, medium hardness; meet EPA/CDPHE requirements (to each site and Ranch Center). For In -Building Sprinkler System No gross contamination - require backflow prevention devices. Use potable water. For Local Landscaping (around each home site) ti 10,000 s.f. (0.23ac) Can be potable or from indirect exempt wells or separate raw water source. If Potable, use limited to 0.23 ac ("10,000 s.f.) per lot/home site and immediate landscaping around the residence. The only significant additional irrigation water quality crietera, using potable water, would be the sodium obsorption ratio. WATER DEMANDS System peak day water demands are estimated as follows: In Building Residences (4 to 5 bedrooms) 4 each @ 800 gpd = 3,200 gpd Large Residences (4 to 5 bedrooms) 2 each @ 1,000 gpd = 2,000 gpd Extra Large Residences (average 8 bedrooms) 2 each @ 1,300 gpd = 2,600 gpd Caretaker Units 3 each @ 500 gpd = 1,500 gpd Club House = 600 gpd New Barn = 250 gpd Pool Building (drain and refill to be scheduled) = 750 gpd Ranch Center (office, Historic Barn, other) = 250 gpd Total Estimated Max Day In -Building Use 11,150 gpd 65418291 MERRICK' Aspen Valley Ranch & COMPANY 2 McLaughlin Water Engineers A Wok(' o(Maikk & Cornpary DESIGN CRITERIA Irrigation 12 Taps —10,000 s.f. each = 2.8 Acres Max Day =32,000 gpd Total Max Day Use = 43,150 GPD Add 10 percent unaccounted for water Use 47,500 gpd Note: For Design purposes, provide 50 percent safety factor Use 70,000 gpd or 50 gpm Fire Protection For reliable protection, all fire fighting flows should be taken from the potable water system. This also dictates the need for 100 percent reliability. For this development, all buildings will be required to be sprinkled. Per ISO procedures, this reduces desired outside hydrant demand by 50%. Sprinkler design criteria should not affect distribution pipe sizing or other system design. It will affect customer service line sizing. Although (generally) sprinkler system installers prefer higher pressures, systems can be reasonably designed to function with pressures above 60 psi. Design fire flows are affected by structure size, use, and density. Information from the Aspen Fire Districtis that design hydrant flows should be 1,000 gpm for a 2-hour period. For safety factor (possible higher demand) it is recommended that a 1,200 gpm rate be used for fire protection flow design. This flow requires a residual pressure greater than 20 psi. OVERVIEW The scope of this Master Plan is limited to the potable water system. All pastures, hay fields, and larger open area irrigation water is to be raw water from separate irrigation systems. Water is to be supplied from existing approved ponds and ditches. The lower irrigation system (for all areas below the Core area) may be be supplied from the lower pond, using a pumped pressursystem. Design of building may he integrated with the potable system as the Owner would like to minimize the number of structures on the Ranch — therefore, the two pumping stations may be combined into one building. The proposed Potable Water Master Plan is illustrated on the attached Drawing 1. WATER SUPPLY The water supply will consist of 2 wells, developed in the Roaring Fork alluvium. Development of this source (drilling the wells and water rights issues) is the responsibility of Resource Engineering. Reuslts of their work are: Two similar wells will be developed, located approximately where shown on Drawing 1. Sustainable capacity of each well is 35 gpm or more. Basic water quality is suitable for potable use, requiring only disinfection treatment. Tested water quality results are shown in Table 1. The proposed water supply facilities will consist of: Two submersible well pumps with pitless adapters, each having a capacity of 35 gpm or greater. Well completion details to meet CDPHE criteria. Each well pump will deliver raw water to the central treatment plant/pumping station, using separate 2-inch interior diameter (ID) pipes. WATER TREATMENT/PUMPING STATION This building is to be located as shown on Drawing 1. It may be expanded to also provide for two irrigation pumps. Functional features will include: Two 2-inch flow meters Electrical equipment Chlorine solution feeder Possible backup generator In -line Ultra Violet unit Controls equipment (monitor tank level, wells status) Two 50 gpm high service pumps Sampling points. 65418291 ❑0❑0o MERRICK"" Aspen Valley Ranch ❑00 & COMPANY McLaughlin Water Engineers A LAMMcn a Mea$ck a Ccnw=rr Preliminary design indicates that the combined structure size will be in the range of 16 ft. by 34 ft. If a separate building is used for the Water Treatment facility, it would be approximately 16 ft. X 20 ft. 65418291 TABLE 1. WELL RAW WATER QUALITY TEST RESULTS RPRMERRICK" & COMPANY MoLaughtln Water Englnnn A C*Micn of themck d Ctmpty Aspen Valley Ranch PROJECT EXPERIENCE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM It is known that optimum system design would result in service to all points from one pressure zone. Table 2, following, provides expected building flow elevations at each use site. TABLE 2. HOME SITE STATIC PRESSURES (ASSUME ONE PRESSURE ZONE) AVAILABLE STATION PRESSURE HOME SITE HOME SITE ELEVATION PSI AT SERVICE TAP Homestead 1 7,265 135* Homestead 2 7,290 124* Homestead 3 7,305 118* Homestead 4 7,315 114* Homestead 5 7,350 99* Homestead 6 7,430 63 Homestead 7 7,460 50** Homestead 8 7,370 90* Homestead 9 7,430 63 Ranch Center 7,325 to 7370 90 to108* Office/Barn/Caretaker New Barn 7,325 110* Pool House 7,325 108* Club House 7,360 93* * Will require PRV on service line. ** May require special bootster pump sprinkler design and domestic booster pump system. Field reconnaissance determined that the highest reasonably available tank site would be on the previously platted Aspen Downs Lot 6 (which is not to be used for a private residence). The probable high water level (HWL) of this tank is 7,580 ft. The static pressures shown on Table 2 assume this tank site with a 10 ft. operating water level of 7,576 ft. Because of line sizing to accommodate fire flows, actual dynamic pressures will only be slightly lower. As shown by Table 2 the proposed tank site is appropriate, and the entire area can be served in one pressure zone. 654'1 8291 HOH MERRICKC 000 & COMPANY McLaughlin Water Engineers A COM:ex, u nsemca a c x,royy Aspen Valley Ranch 6 PROJECT EXPERIENCE Eleven (11) fire hydrants have been approximately located as shown on Drawing 1. These have been sited to provide reasonable accessibility to each proposed structure. Fire hydrant locations are tentative; the Fire Department should review final design and advise as to precise location. Appropriate pipe selection for distribution systems in the mountain areas include ductile iron pipe (DIP) or high density polyethylene (HDPE). If HDPE is used, pipe locate records must be good (as -built drawings and locater wire). Actual pipe selection and piping details will be made during the Final Design Phase. Pipe sizes shown on Drawing 1 are ID. These sizes have been determined as adequate to provide design fire flows simultaneously with average day other demands. STORAGE TANK This system will have relatively high peak demands (as compared to the average daily demand) and can have extremely high fire fighting demands. With the realtively small, constant supply capacity, stored water is mandatory. It is always preferable to deliver peaking water by gravity (pumping not required) which is the situation here. Storage is designed to provide: Peaking Demands. The peak period use which exceeds the supply rate. This volume required is estimated to be 20,000 gallons. Reliability Storage. The system should be designed to supply normal demands with one well out of service. High service pumping capacity will be firm, i.e. adequate with one pump out of service. In the case of one well outage — reliability storage for a 7-day period would be approximately 100,000 gallons during a full occupancy summer peak period. Under average use conditions, or with curtailed irrigation, a volume of 10,000 gallons would usually be adequate. Storage should also be available for area power outage (unless standby power generation is provided). Approximately 80,000 gallons would be adequate for a two day outage during summer months. 80,000 gallons would provide full occupany water for over a week during the winter (no irrigation) season. Fire Fighting. Design fire fighting flow is 1,000 gpm (gallons per minute) for two hours — or 120,000 gallons. Because of the possibility of unusually large residences, the use of 1,200 gpm fire flow is recommended to provide a safety factor. This results in a design fire flow of 144,000 gallons. Summary Standard practice for municipal system design does not assume that a fire and a supply outage will occur at the same time. The recommended tank size is approximately 160,000 gallons. This tank will be approximately 40 ft. outside diameter with a side wall depth of 20 ft. The tank is to be reinforced concrete, complete buried, with the surface restored to the existing shape. An access hatch and vent will be visible. Depending on the selected control system, a nearby antenna may be necessary. The tank/system will be designed to provide hydraulic mixing - because of the relatively long average storage time involved. 6541 8291 MERRICK" ODDO & COMPANY McLaughlin Water Englnoore navit:11oar e.'rckaanwet y Aspen Valley Ranch WAT E R LAW,. TM PATRICK MILLER 1 KROPF NOTO Kevin L. Patrick' shareholder patrick@waterlaw.com reply to Aspen office 'licensed in CO, OK, TX ASPEN OFFICF: 197 Prospector Drive Suite 2104 A Aspen, CO 81611 T. 970.920.1030 F. 970.925.6847 BASALT OFFICE.: Waterlaw Riverwalk 229 Midland Avenue Basalt, CO 81621 T. 970.920.1030 F. 970.927.1030 DENVER OFFICE: 999 18th Street 30th Floor Denver, CO 80202 T. 303.893.9700 F. 303.893.7900 PHOENIX OFFICE: 2415 E. Camelback Suite 700 Phoenix, AZ 85016 T. 800.282.5458 F. 970.927.1030 TULSA, OK OFFICE 7633 E. 63rd Place Suite 300-18 Tulsa, OK 74133 T. 800.282.5458 F. 970.927.1030 www.waterlaw.com Professional Corp. MEMO TO: CC: AVR AH, LLC Glenn Horn Charlie Kees FROM: Kevin Patrick DATE: February 3, 2014 RE: Proof of an Adequate Water Supply for Aspen Valley Ranch Central Water System **?ti****X**********XX :X ::****w.:FXXY.XX*m*w3:**7t7C**wwXXY.XY.XXX This memorandum will provide the required evidence of an adequate water supply for purposes of submitting land use application(s) related to the residential and agricultural uses on Aspen Valley Ranch. The central potable water system will serve the following uses: Homestead 1 — 2 Employee Units and Equipment Building Homestead 2 — Large (5,750 s.f.) residence 4 to 5 bedroom Homestead 3 — Large (5,750 s.f.) residence 4 to 5 bedroom Homestead 4 — Large (5,750 s.f.) residence 4 bedroom Homestead 5 — Large (5,750 s.f.) residence 4 to 5 bedroom ▪ Homestead 6 — Large (10,750 s.f.) residence 4 to 5 bedroom Homestead 7 — Large (10,750 s f.) residence 4 to 5 bedroom Homestead 8 — Extra Large (:----1 12,750 s.f.) residence, 10 bedroom ▪ Homestead 9 - Extra Large (z 12,750 s.f.) residence, 5 to 10 bedroom possible ts Existing Ranch Center (caretaker unit, small office, Histot is hoise barn) Barn (with bathroom facilities) Club House — 3,500 s.f. with kitchen and 2 full baths Swimming Pool building locker tooms and kitchen An onsite potable water tank will serve the demands of the development including fire flow requirements. This tank will be supplied water from an alluvial well field located on the property. This well field is located within Area "A" of the Basalt Water Conservancy District. A well was drilled in December, 2013 during low groundwater conditions and a long term pump test was conducted. The well is an excellent well with a sustained pumping rate of at least 35 g.p.m. A preliminary water quality test shows the well meets all Safe Drinking Water Act parameters (see attached Preliminary Report). A second well will be developed within the designated well field for system redundancy. WA I f (: LAW. f ATRICK I MI ELM I KROPF I NOTO Adequate Water Supply Memo Central Water System February 3, 2014 Page 2 Because the well field is located within Area "A", well permits are covered under the Basalt Water Conservancy District's approved exchange plan providing a legal water supply for the well depletions. In addition, Applicant is the owner of the several approved Water Court legal water supply plans (plans for augmentation). Specifically, the following plans were decreed: Case Nos. 89CW291 & 95CW264: This case decreed a plan for augmentation for the Aspen Valley Ranch (and what is now Aspen Valley Downs) utilizing the Red Canyon Spring Well, Underwood Well No. 1, and Underwood Well No. 2 as sources of supply for up to eight affordable housing units and twelve single family units. Augmentation supplies ate provided by historic consumptive use dry -up credit resulting from the cessation of irrigation of 2.0 acres under the Waco Ditch and 2.7 acres under the Salvation Ditch as non -irrigation releases from the Underwood Pond on the AVR Property. Subsequently, in Case No. 95CW264 additional structures were augmented. Case No. 00CW278: This case decreed a plan for augmentation for the Aspen Valley Ranch for additional demands. Augmentation supplies ate provided by historic consumptive use dry -up credit resulting from the cessation of an additional irrigation under the Waco Ditch; non -irrigation season depletions are augmented via a Basalt Water Conservancy District Contract No. 382. While AVR AH, LLC is a beneficiary of the above plans for augmentation, the development proposal now will utilize an Area "A" Contract with the District. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. WARESOURCE •UUU MEN E N G I N E E= H I N G I N .. . Kevin Patrick, Esq Patrick Miller Kropf & Noto, PC 229 Midland Avenue Basalt, Colorado 81621 February 21, 2014 RE: AVR AH, LLC— 180 W Pasture Lane Well Pumping Test and Water Quality Analysis Dear Kevin: At the request of AVR AH, LLC, Resource Engineering Inc. (RESOURCE) analyzed the water quantity and quality for a new well located at 180 W Pasture Lane Woody Creek, Colorado. The pumping test for the well was conducted on January 141" through 151", 2014, under the direction of RESOURCE. The data for the pumping test was collected by Ray s Well Done Pump Service, LLC (Ray's) and RESOURCE. A water sample from the well was obtained on January 14th, 2014 and submitted to National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. for analysis. SUMMARY The 180 W Pasture Lane Well has a valid monitoring well permit (Permit No. 293077) issued by the Division of Water Resources. The monitoring well permit allows for drilling the well, testing the yield and sampling the water quality. The well has an estimated long-term yield of approximately 40-50 gpm based on a 24-hour pumping test and recovery data. The well water quality shows hard water. However, the water sampled from the well is suitable for domestic uses. WATER WELL VVeII Construction The well was constructed on January 9, 2014, by Shelton Drilling. The well is approximately 105 feet deep and is constructed with 7-inch steel surface casing to approximately 63 feet. Perforated 5.5- inch steel casing was installed in the boulders, cobbles sand and gravel water producing zone from 80 feet to 105. At the time of the well construction, static water level was 75 feet from the top of casing (TOC) and the estimated well production was 15 — 20 gpm. Pumping Test A pumping test was conducted on January 141" through January 151" for the well. A Goulds 25GS15 pump was temporally installed for the test. The test was conducted for a full 24 hours using a step test approach. In the step test the discharge rate was started at an initial low constant rate of 15 gpm. The discharge rate was increased progressively higher to 20 gpm and then 30 gpm. Each step lasted approximately 30 minutes until the pump was at full capacity. Each step was of sufficient duration to allow dissipation of the well casing storage effects. Therefore, the aquifer was given enough time to stabilize. Data was collected approximately every minute during the step test. Once the pump was at full discharge and the water level was steady, measurements were taken every 10 minutes for the next 30 minutes and then at regular Consulting Engineers and Hydrologists 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81 601 (970) 94;3-0 7 77 i : Fax (9701 8/I5-11 37 Kevin Patrick Page 2 February 21, 2014 intervals for the remainder of the test. A water meter was used to measure the instantaneous flow rate and the volume of water pumped throughout the pumping test. The initial water level was 73.5 feet below the TOC as shown in Figure 1. The initial pumping rate was approximately 15 gpm. The well had a total drawdown of approximately 1.1 feet as shown in Figures 2 and 3. At approximately 4 hours into the test the aquifer began to recharge. The recharge was mostly likely caused by the pump discharge being decreased for a short time or water infiltrating into the aquifer. The drawdown was projected assuming a continuous drawdown. The final water level at the end of the pumping part of the test was projected to be 74.6 feet, leaving approximately 25 feet of water above the pump intake. Over the 24-hour pumping period approximately 43,851 gallons was pumped, resulting in an average pumping rate of 30.2 gpm. Analysis Figures 2 and 3 shows the water level in the well dropped 0.1 ft when the pump discharge was set at 15 gpm. Similarly when the discharge was set to 20 gpm, the water level dropped another 0.12 ft. When the pump was set at approximately 30.5, the well dropped another 0.4 ft. and then steadily declined until the water level was at 0.78 ft and then the aquifer slightly recharged. The small decline in the aquifer is attributed to the well being drilled in an unconfined alluvial aquifer. The aquifer is extensive and hydraulically connected to Woody Creek and the Roaring Fork River. Figures 4 and 5 depict the water level recovery in the well in the time after pumping ceased. T represents the total time since the pumping test started and T' represents the time since pumping stopped. The well reaches complete recovery at TIT equals more than 2 (48 hr/24 hr), which means the well recovered faster than the rate at which the well was pumped. This indicates that, at the time of the test, the well completely recharged at a rate equal to or more than the 30.5 gpm average pumping rate. The data from the pressure transducer was analyzed to determine the Transmissivity (T) of the soil surrounding the well and the long term pumping rate (Q) of the well. The transmissivity is a measure of how much water can be transmitted horizontally to the well. The modified Theis method or the Cooper -Jacob Straight -Line Method was utilized to calculate transmissivity. This method was used to calculate the coefficient of transmissivity from the slope of a semi - logarithmic plot of time verses residual drawdown as shown on Figure 2. The method uses the following equation: 1,= 2640 As Where T = Coefficient of Transmissivity (gpd/ft.) Q = Constant Pumping Rate (gpm) As = Slope of time versus drawdown graph expressed as the change in drawdown between any two times on the log scale whose ratio is 10 (one log cycle). fly RESOURCE Kevin Patrick Page 3 February 21, 2014 Using a As value of 0.18 feet from Figure 2 and an average pumping rate of 30.2 gpm the coefficient of transmissivity (T) = 44,450 gpd/ft. The Cooper -Jacob Straight -Line Method equation can be applied to data for both confined and unconfined aquifers. However, for unconfined aquifers drawdown must be corrected using the following formula: Ds 2 As'=As- 2D As = Slope of time versus drawdown graph expressed as the change in drawdown between any two times on the log scale whose ratio is 10 (one log cycle). As' = New drawdown D = Saturated zone of thickens (ft.) The As value was slightly changed to 0.176 feet. The Jacob equation was utilized in estimating the long term yield. The equation is as follows: $ Where T = Coefficient of Transmissivity (ft.2/t) Q = Constant Pumping Rate (ft.3/t) S = Storage Coefficient (ft./ft.) s = Drawdown (ft.) t = Time (t) rW = Well Radius (ft.) Q In 2.25Tt 4xT rw S The storage coefficient was estimated using the time span during the pumping test where the well began to stabilize as shown plotted with an arithmetic scale in Figure 3. Using T = 4.1 ft2/min (44,450 gpd/ft.), Q = 4.1 ft3/min (30.2 gpm), s = 1.1 feet, t = 1440 minutes, rW = 0.25 feet (6 inch diameter well), the storage coefficient (S) was calculated to be 0.15 ft./ft. The storage coefficient was used to calculate the long term yield. The drawdown in the well was limited to 2 ft and one year was used for time to ensure that the long term yield was calculated. Using S = 0.15 ft./ft., T = 4.1 ft2/min (44,700 gpd/ft.), s = 2.0 feet, t = 525,600 minutes (1 year), rW = 0.5 feet (6 inch diameter well), the long term pumping rate (Q) was calculated to be 5.17 ft3/min (38.7 gpm). The long term yield of the well appears to be in excess of the 30 gpm pumping rate achieved during the 24 hour test. RESOURCE estimates the long term yield of the well at approximately 40 to 50 gpm, depending upon how much the aquifer is drawn down. RESOURCE iiifijRESOURCE �in NOI11ECNINO 1NO. Kevin Patrick Page 4 February 21, 2014 recommends drilling a second well to provide a redundant supply and to allow for pumping at a flow rate that would not push the estimated maximum yield of the well. WATER QUALITY RESOURCE collected one water quality sample from the well water during the pumping test. The sample was shipped by overnight delivery under proper chain of custody to National Testing Laboratories (results attached). The results indicate that the well water meets the basic EPA primary and secondary drinking water standards. However, the well water did reveal a hardness of 230 mg/I, which is considered very hard. Hard water can cause scale to build up on water fixtures and lessen effectiveness of soaps. RESOURCE recommends installing individual water softening equipment as may be desired for each of the individual potable water uses. WATER RIGHTS The existing well was drilled under well permit No. 293077 issued by the Colorado Division of Water Resources (DWR) for a monitoring test well. A production well permit will need to be obtained to allow the well to be used for the AVR water system. The existing test well and the future well are/will be located within Service Area A of the Basalt Water Conservancy District (BWCD). An Area A Water Allotment Contract will be obtained from BWCD to replace the depletions from pumping of the wells. The BWCD Water Allotment Contract will provide the water rights necessary to obtain production well permits from the DWR. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. Michael J. Erio,'.E Water Resour es Engineer MJE/mmm 1416-1.0 Attachments CC: Brooke Peterson, w/attachments Dean Derosier, P.E., Merrick & Company, w/attachments ■NY 11Y1� Y Y I11g1�� R E S O U R C E • l N d 6 N G I N E E N 1 If 4 1 1, C. (wd6) a;ej Mold O 00 CO 'st N O CO CO 1- N O CO CO d N M M M M M N N N N N v- r' r r r' O 0 0 r O O r O CO CO '!" N O I I i I, I I 1 { I I I 1 { 1 I i - Ave. Pumping Rate = 30.7 gpm L. beic vel: 7d Top of 0ft. fi tudb oz = ajeb bu!duand •and Static Water Level = 73.5 ft. _.. .......-..-._-._«--..- .................... i..-......r...... _.-... I Rate ..1 .... _. ... ._-... -.._. - .... _ ... .. --... _....._ ...._ .. _. ..... � .. .. N cn mcr Gael) 001 woa j u;daa LE) W N- Depth of Water from TOC U) CD . tg um0ig rar C Q CD M M Cr CO CO O 0 r O O r O r r (wd6) algid mold op Co 't' N 0 CO CO N O NNNNN r r r r co CO it N o i i I Notes: 1) Average Pumping Rate: 30.2 gpm I ... _ ____ ... _.__ _ - _.. -- ... .:_....... ..,..... _ _. �_ .... .._._..... — _ ......_ _._____ ........ ._ .. .._........._._ _.. _. � _ . _._ ..............I __._-____.___._--_-_.____._T _____ _ — _ _.......... ____ .._. .......... ........ ......-. ... ............ ___-.._ l' . _ -_.... ... oo Drawdown :et iinutes r II �.7 fee 00 mir U) I i Projected h = 0.88 1 t= 1000I � f _ .... _I i -.�::::.::: _ _ -i-_:_.. i_.......... �� I. ______ _.. -- -1 - ... -- -........ 11 T-' _._ t- • T _ .. __ �..... _T_.....-.... _. _......... _..._ ....... ........_._.__�__....,_....._,_.._ .1.-.. __........_ ._ .... . .. ._ »..... I I I ._........ _. ........ _...._ ._.... ........ .__ _ _...._ ...-.-__.___._1_._.,_. .4. II . ...................... _. .. ......, _ _ .. _.. .. -- _ _ -- - V .-..- V -. _ . ... . ... .. ...-. O O r O N M d Ln O O O O O ON) UMopMe.iQ N. O co. rn O O V" Ct O c 0 -a L. 0 W U CC 3 0 W O u z O z CC 411 z 0 z W r N Pumping Time (minutes) 0 0 N 0 CO '0 W r 0 0 N 0 0 CO0 0 0 0 O 0 N 0 411(I i1 1 EI�I I I Irawdown nutes .. .. Notes: 1) Average Pumping Rate: 30.2 gpm 1 IJ :LH. Projected h=1.1 fe t=1440i _ i _1 II a ; il _i, II jjf1ll •;. - -- - I I11 11 1 i_ I I�II 1 I , I tli j . 1 I .. A A AIt ..1_ _l I -... 1.. . .. . y .... _ • .... •.. . I I I• II_ 1 I -f { II I I 1 � E 1 1 I E I I 1 : I � 1 � ; 1 I I : I t 1 11 I II 1 ' I ; E 1 1 gg ........--_. .. _ _ . . . M - . ...... .. .... .. t. ....... .... »..... .+.L.. .' ..... _..._. ... ... .�. _ .. ....... ...}i. _. ... I 1 1 11 1 I 1 1 ,_;_.1� 1 I .II I I i I.1 I �1 I i _. , r-J_ I ; 1 1 L J O 1` co V/ O r N CO V J (0 Imo' co 0) O (laa') umopmeia N CO 0 0 �0 TIT (mpnutes) 0 0 0 0 0 0 � I i I J ; b ....... — f 1 I I . I -_...._ ..... 1 i I o�' U a > N .1 ...... ......_ ___ ,- .............. .. .- ........._.._._.._— -..-....... _........ -... ..... -..... 1 L-. ..............�.............. ....................................... Notes: 1) Well recharges at a rate equal to or c rate when the well reaches fully recc _... -... _ I- - - _ J-_ _ _.-A.....__ - _._..._ _ - T�- n i, O O 0 0 (aaal) uMopMeit ienpisaj C a) 0 0 a) _0 -D -013 Q o < r N C0 0 0 0 r 0 r CD r r CO r L -4 (lean) 001 woe j u;dea L L W s -0 -0 73 o Q L. N O" L d Q N M N WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1. WELL PERMIT NUMBER 293077 2 Owner Mailing City, Phone State, Name(s): # Address: Zip . AVR : Aspen, P.O. AH Box Co LLC 4068 81612 APPROVAL# 0WS31-91-03 WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED 3 DISTANCES SUBDIVISION: STREET ft. ADDRESS from FROM SEC. AT Sec. Aspen LOCATION LINES line Valley and SW Ranch 1/4 11. from 0370 LOT: SE 1/4 West HS2 Pasture Sec. Sec: BLOCK: line Lane OR 5 Woody Easting: Creek Twp: FILING 81 3 656 9 35 696 (UNIT): S Range: Northing: 85 W 43 50 6th 905 PM 4 GROUND DATE COMPLETED: SURFACE ELEVATION 1/9/2014 ft. TOTAL DEPTH: 105 DRILLING METHOD DEPTH COMPLETION: Air Rotary 105 5. GEOLOGIC LOG 6. HOLE DIAMETER (in) FROM (ft) TO (ft) Depth Type of Material (Size, Color, and Type) 9.0 0 63 000-105 Boulders, Cobbles, Sand, Gravel 6.5 63 105 7. PLAIN CASING OD (in) Kind Wall Size From (ft) To (ft) 7.0 Steel 0.188 -1 63 5.5 Steel 0.188 41 80 PERE CASING : Screen Slot Size 5.5 Steel 0.188 80 105 Water Located: 80+ 8. Material Size Filter : Pack : 9. Type Depth Packer : : Placement Remarks : Interval : 10. GROUTING RECORD Material Amount Density Interval Placement Cement 6 sks 6 gal/sk 10-25 poured 11. DISINFECTION : Type : HTH Amt. Used : 1 oz. 12. TESTING Static Pumping Test WELL Remarks: Level Level TEST METHOD : : 75 DATA Total : ft. : Air () ft. Compressor Check Box If Test Date/Time Date/Time Data Is Submitted Measured Measured On Supplemental 1/9/2014 1/9/2014 Production Test Length Rate : 2 30+ hours gpm 1 have herein know the that they true to knowledge. to Section 24-4-1-4 (13Xa) CRS, the making of false statements 13. constitutes CONTRACTOR Mailing read the perjury Address stalgments in the second : made : degree Shelton P.O. and and Box is Drilling 1059 Punishable contents as a Corp. thereof, class Basalt, 1 and misdemeanor.) C 8 are ,6121 my (Pursuant / Phone Lic. No. (970) 1095 927-4182 Name / Title (Please Type or Print) Signatur4 ._r----- �, - Date ---'- Wayne Shelton /President fr i fr 1/23/2014 Informational Water Quality Report Well -Check (¢Dins Iron & Tannins) Client: Ashley Moffatt 909 Colorado Ave Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ordered By: Resource Engineering 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ATTN: Ryan McBride Definition and Legend M National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. Quaff' y W atex nalysetiik y 6571 Wilson Mills Rd Cleveland, Ohio 44143 1-800-458-3330 Sample Number: 842225 Location: 1416-1.0 AVR AM LLC Type of Water: Well Water Collection Date and Time: Received Date and Time: 1/15/2014 08:50 Date Completed: 1 /27/2014 This informational water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined in the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. Primary Standards: Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which is the highest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards. Secondary standards: Are non -enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor,or color) in drinking water. Individual states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards. Action levels: Are defined in treatment techniques which are required processes intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. mg/L (ppm): Minimum Detection Level (MDL): ND: The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level. NA: The contaminant was not analyzed. The contaminant was not detected in the sample above the minimum detection level. Unless otherwise indicated, results and standards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or parts per million. The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant. The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level, but not above the referenced standard. The contaminant was detected above the standard, which is not an EPA enforceable MCL. EMI The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL. These results may be invalid. Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Microbiologicals Total Coliform by P/A Total Coliform and E.coli were ABSENT, however bacteria results may be invalid due to lack of collection information or because sample has exceeded 30 hour holding time. Inorganic Analytes - Metals Aluminum ND mg/L 0.2 EPA Secondary 0.1 Arsenic N D mg/L 0.010 EPA Primary 0.005 Barium ND mg/L 2 EPA Primary 0.30 Cadmium N D mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002 Calcium 63.7 mg/L 2.0 Chromium ND mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.010 Copper ND mg/L 1.3 EPA Action Level 0.004 Iron 0.026 mg/L 0.3 EPA Secondary 0.020 Iron -Dissolved ND mg/L 0.020 Lead N D mg/L 0.015 EPA Action Level 0.002 Magnesium 16.30 mg/L 0.10 Manganese N D mg/L 0.05 EPA Secondary 0.004 Mercury N D Nickel N D Potassium mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.001 mg/L 0.020 1.7 mg/L 1.0 Selenium N D mg/L 0.05 EPA Primary 0.020 ipSilica 13.4 mg/L 0.1 Silver N D mg/L 0.100 EPA Secondary 0.002 Sodium 5 mg/L 1 Zinc ND mg/L 5 EPA Secondary 0.004 Physical Factors Alkalinity (Total as CaCO3) 190 mg/L 20 Corrosivity 0.439 SI Hardness 230 mg/L 100 NTL Internal 10 Page 2 of 3 1/27/2014 12:13:41 PM Product: Well -Check (+Diss Iron & Tannins) Sample: 842225 Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level pH 7.8 pH Units 6.5 to 8.5 EPA Secondary Total Dissolved Solids 270 mg/L 500 EPA Secondary 20 Turbidity 0.1 NTU 1.0 EPA Action Level 0.1 Inorganic Analytes - Other r Chloride ND mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0 Fluoride ND mg/L 4.0 EPA Primary 0.5 Nitrate as N N D rng/L 10 EPA Primary 0.5 r Nitrite as N ND mg/L 1 EPA Primary 0.5 Ortho Phosphate N O mg/L 2.0 Sulfate 53.0 mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0 Tannin/Lignin N D mg/L 0.5 We certify that the analyses performed for this report are accurate, and that the laboratory tests were conducted by methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods. These test results are intended to be used for informational purposes only and may not be used for regulatory compliance. National Testing 1Lboratories, Ltd. NATIONAL TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD Page 3 of 3 1/27/2014 12:13:41 PM Product: Well -Check (+Diss Iron & Tannins) Sample: 842225 Informational Water Quality Report Iron Bacteria Client: Ashley Moffatt 909 Colorado Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ordered By: Resource Engineering 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ATTN: Ryan McBride Definition and Legend M National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. Quality water Avt y' 6571 Wilson Mills Rd Cleveland, Ohio 44143 1-800-458-3330 Sample Number: 842224 Location: 1416-1.0 AVR AM LLC Type of Water: Well Water Collection Date and Time: Received Date and Time: 1/15/2014 08:50 Date Completed: 1/23/2014 This informational water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined in the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. Primary Standards: Secondary standards: Action levels: mg/L (ppm). Minimum Detection Level (MDL): ND: NA: • K Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which is the highest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards. Are non -enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor,or color) in drinking water. Individual states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards. Are defined in treatment techniques which are required processes intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. Unless otherwise indicated, results and standards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or parts per million. The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant. The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level. The contaminant was not analyzed. The contaminant was not detected in the sample above the minimum detection level. The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level, but not above the referenced standard. The contaminant was detected above the standard, which is not an EPA enforceable MCL. The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL. These results may be invalid. Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Microbiologicals Iron Bacteria by P/A Iron Related Bacteria is ABSENT in this Sample. We certify that the analyses performed for this report are accurate, and that the laboratory tests were conducted by methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods. These test results are intended to be used for informational purposes only and may not be used for regulatory compliance. National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. NATIONAL TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD Page 2 of 2 1/23/2014 2:52:35 PM Product: Iron Bacteria Sample: 842224 1 Form No. GWS-25 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 r APPLICANT WELL PERMIT NUMBER 293077 DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD LIC Lot: HS 2 Block: Filing: AVR AH LLC C/O KEVIN PATRICK ESQ 229 MIDLAND AVENUE BASALT, CO 81621- (970) 920-1030 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL Subdiv: ASPEN VALLEY RANCH APPROVED WELL LOCATION PITKIN COUNTY SW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 5 Township 9 S Range 85 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES Ft. from Section Line Ft. from Section Line • UTM COORDINATES (Meters,Zone:13,NAD83) Easting: Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(I) for uses as described in CRS 37-92-602(1)(f). Use of this well is limited to monitoring water levels and/or water quality sampling. This well is known as AVR Ranch, Homestead 2, Monitoring Observation Well no. 1. 4) This well must be equipped with a locking cap or seal to prevent well contamination or possible hazards as an open well. The well must be kept capped and locked at all times except during sampling or measuring. 5) Records of water level measurements and water quality analyses shall be maintained by the well owner and submitted to the Division of Water Resources upon request. 6) Upon conclusion of the monitoring program the well owner shall plug this well in accordance with Rule 16 of the Water Well Construction Rules. A Well Abandonment Report must be completed and submitted to the Division of Water Resources within 60 days of plugging. 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with the well permit number and name of aquifer as appropriate, and shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well must be constructed by or under the supervision of a licensed well driller or other authorized individual according to the Water Well Construction Rules. If non-standard construction is anticipated, a variance request must be submitted in accordance with Rule 18 and approved prior to well construction. 9) A Well Construction and Test Report (Form GWS-31), including lithologic log must be submitted by the individual authorized to construct the well. For non-standard construction, the report must include an as -built drawing showing details such as depth, casing, perforated zones, and a description of the grouting type and interval. 10) Pursuant to Rule 6.2.3 of the Water Well Construction Rules, the well construction contractor shall submit the as -built well location on work reports required by Rule 17.3 within 60 days of completion of the well. The measured location must be accurate to 200 feet of the actual location. The location information must include a GPS location (UTM coordinates) pursuant to the Division of Water Resources' guidelines. NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not guarantee that this well can be converted to a production well under a future permit. Additionally, pursuant to Rule 14.2 of the Water Well Construction Rules (2 CCR 402-2), monitoring holes constructed pursuant to a monitoring hole notice shall not be converted to a production well. (Upon obtaining a permit from the State Engineer, a monitoring hole may be converted to a monitoring well, recovery well for remediation of the aquifer, or a dewatering system for dewatering the aquifer.) NOTE: This well is to be located in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, or the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, Sec. 5, or the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, or the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4, Sec. 8, all located in, Twp. 9 South, Rng. 85 West, 6th P.M., being a residential site of 35.09 acre(s) described as, Aspen Valley Ranch, Homestead 2, Pitkin County. Further identified as; 0370 West Pasture Lane, Woody Creek, CO 81656. ,7 NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 49-2643-053-02-002 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R019795 /2 9,-c �f.3 • APPROVED DMW Receipt No. 9503773 • 4" State Engineer By DATE ISSUED 12-13-2013 EXPIRATION DATE 12-13-2015 • 7t/cirizi/ l 1 X 3 A ASPEN VALLEY RANCH - PITKIN COUNTY POTABLE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CONCEPTUAL PLAN 2014 ASPEN VALLEY RANCH LAND USE SUBMITTAL LEGEND 7290 aff 4, 1 \ �\ Plat BOOK 98 • '4' SilefdP L WA AO,t "1 4' w y 1 • ! 1 "."...'.• ...... ..1. /,r • �� i ...,•-- �\ `� �/ * `/ SiTPreUSLDINS ELEVATION PROPOSED 141 LOCATION WATER UNE WITI.tl ROADWAY WATER UM OUTSIDE ROADWAY swum Lre V f `\ HS 1 1 \ 7285 1 /Vr NI/f/ \4f I � 4 COUNTY ROAD RIGHT OF WAY (UPPER RIVER ROAD) 1" = 200' 4, + PtA7 WOK 98+ ner 49 �Y �Y .*VS..54 Aa4a V, \ HS 8 \ \ 7430 AVR POT :_ \ '!! 131 'CEL B 1�19.38 AC:- "ai /r HS 9 7430 \ I ;---; f, / 04_ NO BLDG OR T WATER SERVICE / \ all / �......` / 1 II / / ) WIce seev q -. • TA82&TQ2 45: inw NO DWG) OR i i \ I 7 1\ / It "' �I i !�•y-• \,J;^I He 7.0 \7480 \ �1 t \\ ,..• \\ \ / r LOT ABOOK 98 W43 San AC t LOT 8 waa as Afrx NO EfLOG OR WATER ser1ttce n 7 "1 li/ '_ • / / / LOfAril war a 7 Pat / / / 7580 TANG 160000 GALS I•IAL -7580 sae PLAN i / LOT 5 • • 020320NIA ISSUE Virtit 1°�ote°❑ug.�8t COMPANYMRRICK a hlin Water Engineers A 1)•:L+on et ?L r.i_:< t. .nn•I'-nny LC FEpOj C Y, 2014 NNE Construction Office / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / s,. / / i" I/ / '. • / (. / R/ r / - 11 :r ., • • • • • • / / / / / / / / / / / ln\ 1 `+. / \.\ / / / / / f t .1 i LEGEND EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN n C r1 ri ri o LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE VICINITY MAP PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN t Construction Fencing Construction Parking Staging, Materials Storage, Waste Management Emergency Vehicle Access: Highway 82 to Upper River Road, Upper River Road to Aspen Valley Ranch Lane. Aspen Valley Ranch - Ranch House Construction Management Plan DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHRECTURE LAN PLANNING URBAN DESIGN 311 Moln Sheet. Svlle 102 Corbondo'L CO.8162.3 1970.963.6520 a. co PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO: 13196.00 (r) 0)711.215.M1=10. SIG URI: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN ITASERt _entire Site, Not to scale .fnc: er.yr rs nktcd, fah :en •'«/ MMbrrr :ey aqr error, 00tea' q:ln JC dVKr n: Pitt notol• tat:* eine ;ran titer ,»r /vtf vivo sr .ta rA Aftff fa no nos/ n y try toys( act“, .and ,ylln J%1 citorf atr tvn ty es rt<,nr,trtd men GM fa pricy /rn at dib VA: t..•gn'sten M,ra Ant: r. CC 58926'06'W 265Z 16' Existing wildlife Easem en t 78.57 Acres mow tier r18 00' GRAPHIC SCALE I. A rnr) :tech -xcn TUFTY' SURVEYING SERVICES 226 kieatkret LG.ra Glen/rcQC J.or-"Fs, colcroca 82160° l/9700 925-9708 sett tss-Us. CCM (=AX 947-90G.7i ;29 ar USE 13. 9 7 P36 first Amended /041 .Lazard Review Plan Agricultural Parcel 2 s-- en Valley le Ranch P�`flcir� County, Colorado powoor IUTTI4 SURVEYING SERVICES 275. JC ` a ss 93.92 Acres +/- 52 5.8924'47'YY 253&6J' 03ts<'opfne:t En.tefope. far Resvgetation Agricultural Facilities Parcel 129.64 - t_e^;c• :es-:ri;, C-: r^ifs: h-.e�CeG AY-•cV•t,re. 'C:r.?('^.4 Ister vcVs'• encr acc r; ,s :c ;ne Aintree:" S cd!vis•cr. Exe`-2:;f P.C. ereee. re:Cre jaipsit.t'LletykesitUai ottetleiGlloeft ►i ret.r'•o. ee:e'oc:cent Jlrectc=s etz-cta .s A::i Yi:y E've cpe, S :e '.Cr *Cs :ten 'et.ewt cccrorec .:gy the :3-i^Lr 7e:e:tore': '' :Si^ '`•e-�= day :° -t•i 2:Cs5 saa et. to 'J G-2C08 cs Race0:9- \: • 5c684. 4d:•C-istrc:we ity :.. e'C.n"ert rector Jr": ,o5' \'PC'3S'311 ;:cr^'r • err:_ 7'sec":Ice :1/40C.lccr: cox-dr!eCges:gist -e/sr.e 'es seer '^fcrr,etii cy P!iK- r.:j . ^e existence - �4'. -oze:d cress' t ct :'g offec. cro;€rtj a-d :ny r.�,rsve- ents, G' ! :re .se G - ccc:carcy t*erect. The cvv!s`cns c' t ese reg.:.1i3ns co ^alr: cn. xey assure .r r-•:i i^r. the :•ece c :?ice :r the dss!g^aeec aozcre :read ^. C9 '-ee frog', ^czc's's, thct sccrovec -+i: ^yccir•^ \O ^r.eC BU.'9s •t �: _z:crcrtee :"e sore.} C' Cry o ::e•:}'. _•.a _.L.:.. First Amended /Olt Hazard Review Plan r-1. 1• ,. e • S ;cuss `cae•re^t Cite :_7zri Mod Floc' Gel°J Not To Scars 0sv. —t Envelops / `f Linn of r PP aE II run. `lccd Plcrr, run. • • • • RECEPT:01/4": 04e1CO3 04'31 009E at 10:18:44MI. sG'<. R $11.00JanicsK Vol Caudill. Pithin ceantW. CO elJr e< of PO it 4cceptc^ce ler Recnt^.g `r's A.r e^ a 1C4! cz✓e Revew ':c ":` ,g 'n the o`fce o`.tte C:e' Ce:areP 5s p�,�^is ; : dcy 8COk c`. °cce — • • Ste °i_n r.cs end 3ecor�sr 0l.A.,, deer s.ccest_d cf. ?ltkP Coon ty, 207 .r a:c: cs Re:er Vc- Clerk- trio �teccecr r c *vyv Agricultural Facilities Parcel Aspen Valley Ranch 1 or' 1 1 . 0 OYIORDAVATE AUGMENT AND DEPTH OF SEER UNE 0177/ AL OILIER 1177LIBES /N THE ROADWAYS AND AT ROAD CROSSINGS c• C0.10./UN'//Y HOSE -INSTALL I - 1,500 ; . CALLON SEPTIC TAN/{. LOCATE JUST � .-- ' OUTS.DI£ BULOUVC VELOPE. /NSTALL ^• L �r----,Iva; ray- �♦♦ i ,, 10 TANK AT 1X /NSTALL 4'LVA B/OIUB£ r y%9 '.' /N TAM( OULET/7FE VERIFY AND ADJUST \' r ��, TANK ELEVATI� PER UNE ELEVATIONS // ,�� " 10 FEET OF 4' SDI? 35 PIN; FROAI AWE FROM HOME. MORE INFO / / /NSTALL -J4' OF 4' SEW 35 PVC, CONNECT TO 4' PIPE ON VOW SYDE OF 8" CASING PIPE UNDO? DEBRIS FLOW. SEAL CASING PIPE ENDS CLWIWM ELEVA770W3 OF ENO OF PIPE PRIOR TO /NSTALLA770V OF EFFLUENT LINES /NSTALL CLEAN OUT O'J75JOE TAM( /NSTALL 230' Cr 4" STIR 35 P1'C ALONG EDGE OF ROADWAY ANO ABOW BARN. VERIFY WATER AND OTHE7R! Ufh/TY CROSSINGS AND LOCAnOKS/INSTALL CO AT H 100' INTERVALS/$E/yG HISTORIC BARN /NSTALL 1 - 1,000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK. LOCATE JUST 001SOIE BARN /NSTALL 30 FEET & 4' .SDI 35 PVC FR04/ BARN TO TANK A IX INSTALL 4 D/A B/071W IN TAM( / OULET TEE. VERIFY AND ADIJST TANK / EZEVA77CW3 PER UNE EZEVA17ONS FROM BARN SEE DESIGN MEMO FOR MORE /NF,O. /NSTALL 40' OF 4" SCR 35 PVC FRO!! TANK TO 4" EFFLUENT UNE /N ROADS/AY CONNECT (HIE INTO LINE). INSTALL% If; CLEANOUT PER/FY ALL UnUTY CROSSINGS .4N0 LOCH PONS / /NSTALL 20' OF 4' SYIR 35 PI*) FR04I BLOC 70 TANK AND 20' FRO)% TANK 70 4' EFFLUENT UNE IN ROADWAY CONNECT INTO UNE). ',miryALuTCROSSINGS LOCAnovs / INSTALL 400' OF 4' SIN 35 PI.V FROM BARN CONNECTION TO TIER BOX ON SOUTH SIDE OF ROAD. INSTALL UNE ON THE EDGE OF PIE ROADWAY. VFTT/FY AN COVI7RM ALL OTHER UTILITIES REPLACE OR RECtWF7CUR£ SPUTTER BOX• �� 70 ONE INLET PIPE AND 2 OUTLET PIPES OUTLET PIPES TO EAC/1 SPLIT INTO 2 SETS OF2ROSSFOREVEVFLOW D/SIR/BUROM A 1 EX OWS ADDITION - ADD 1 ADO/TIOVAL� ROW OF 23 INFILTRATORS TO THE , EXISTING 3 ROWS OF 23 UN/IS ADO ROW 10'T07HEY,EST ! 1 NEY/ SPUTTER BOX TO ONE INLET PIPE' ANO 2 OUTLET PIPES. OUTLET PIPES TO \® EACH SPLIT /NT02SE7SOF2ROWS FOR EVEN FLOW 01S7R/BUT70V 1 OWS - CLEM'/OUT/NSPECncWPORT AT 771E END OF EACH ROY/ air DOWN TO LIA//T N57E7/UTY I et r I HISTORIC BARN , , , , , , DE, 'ir ea Err 0 C, CO!J1JUN/TY HOUSE CORE AREA J. SEPTIC AMCTLOCATE JUSIT OUTSLV£. = ti BLOC.. INSTALL ^•• 30 FEET OF 4' SMR ' PVC FROM BARN 10 TANK AT 1* INSTALL 4'D/A 81011/ IE- /N TANK AULET �!- _——� TEE. VERIFY AND ADJUST TANK EZEVATiONS PER UNE EZEVAT1OVS FROM BLDG. SEE DE'S/OV MEMO FOR MORE /NFU CARETAKER UNIT • NECT NEW UNE FROM CORE AREA / 1 70 THE EXISTING 4" EFTLENT FROM SYSTEM / 2 PRIOR TO SPLTIT7ER BOX OHS ADDITION - ADD 4 ADDITIONAL ROWS OF 23 1NFTL7RATORS TO JN£ SOUTH OF THE EXISTING SYS7E4/. ' CORE AREA OHS 7 (BJ ROWS OF 23 1 !MIL IRA TORS (F$4) TOTAL hVF7L IRA TOR 3 EXISTING ANO 5 NEW ROWS TO BE f 10 FEET APART — 3 TO 4' DEEP. 5' I! MAATPUM DEPTH, SPLASH PLATE AT PIPE , ENTRY a .erl h'ser ♦ 1 er f 1 / 7 rj ) 1 ''' / 1 I / ` -/ 1 i \ 1il 1 I I I, 1 I jj °I ij 1 ! I / / 1 1 !). / '/ ` 1 ,1\.._,7 .: -. 1 / / I \ / / / / N `Lc ``\ /� \/ / / �_ IN` \ / / 1 \ \ / / 1 !'\ 1/ / ) rj V / 1;\ I. -1Is' / 1/ 1 .1 II jI 1' I / [4 1- 1 \ ii \ ) \ \ IN \ \ )1 1 1 e /1 ' 1 1 1 i :i 1 1 ! .I - -1 i- .1 I, 11 I I IN1,. 1I1 1 I I I I ! 11 I 1�'N 1\ .-._ 1 1 \ \ l 1•�Y� ` III I 1 ) 1 '2" Per R:ser La Ca p i1 rO , CO S Cl,: E) EXISTING AND FUTURE GROUND BACKF U. — 3'MNUS IIAX. - „ — TOP SOIL BEDDING ZONE — FINE NATNE 1WTERNL NO LARGER TIWI Is IN DIAMETER WETER IN 6 • OF INFILTRATOR �— 1 v v •.. v V v v9I.) 7 if vvv'. -•VOVV :• •_• vv9 vvv VV% / v v v INFILTRATOR / 3' re IN D — 92 — FOOT INFILTRATOR TRENCHES — 23 UNITS II EACH W04GI. 3 EXISTING ANO 5 NEW ROWS MINIMUM DEPTH IS 3—FOOT TO BOTTOM OF TRENCH, 10' APART MINIMUM 184 TOTAL INFILTRATORS IE TD DE FIELD DETERUGNED BY ENGINEER 4' SDR 35 P10 PIPING TO EACH 010 OF EACH INFILTRATOR TRENCH INSTALL SPLASH PLATE INSIDE INFILTRATOR TRENCH DETAIL - NTS x:zi- (2) Number Revision Description By Dote ASPEN VALLEY RANCH PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO liltfaa:MSFES CORE AREA % 2 ADDITION ISDS/OWS SYSTEM PLAN AND DETAILS ISDS/OWS FOR ALL CORE AREA BUILNGS DESIGN: GDD DETAIL: GDD CHECK: RCM DATE: MAY 2014 PROJECT NUMBER 65418291 Dr -owing Number: ISDS C2 1 A501 LEVEL PLAN CI \ SCALE: 1/4' = michael fuller architects PERMIT @ 076 027 6366 IA deaip% bet, snraaaents and Cara Faddad bydant rah-0 end speodrans St INPriay eatatliM «MA data end Cal near be sad n dry date and. nu La and bywyOYupsnm laaq vie 1•hYsea.e a riecct w iten perrSiln Witandraws be stall Ufa pteC dales 0.er =Fed dmerabns add seat be wad Mr* )Asia My dmansed d didsper/ i\aI De ttarna it &atm ddekd+bd vice UComadomaa d My eon. PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: BE CHECKED BY: JS ISSUE DATE: 5/12/14 PLOT: 5/12/14 MAIN LEVEL PLAN 2 a A101