HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.074.2003 (FOR ASSESSORS AND COUNTY COMMISSIONERS USE ONLY)
RESOLUTION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Resolution No. ~_.~/./--
~ecfioq l: In acco~ance ~th 39-1-113(1.5), C.R.S., the commisslone~ of Plain C~n~ au~odze the a~essor ta
~l~ pelicans for a~teme~ or ~nd and ~o softie by ~en mutua agr~me~ a~ such pet~on ~r ~at~ent
~ in an amount of one ~ ddlam or less ~r ~, pamel, or lot of land or per schedule ~ persona/
~e assessor and ps,richer aurally a~a to an ~sessed value and ~x abatamenVr~u~
Tax Year.
T~
Oflglna[
Coveted
Able.nd
PLEASE NO~: ~E TOTAL T~ AMOU~ DOES NOT INCLUD
e~d. Submlt~ _
No prote=t filed in ....~'~'~' ""'~ ~a ~mte~t was filed Please a~ch a copy of NOD
Denied for the foll~ng ~son(s): ' .)
, . ........ ,o=,unur~ or ~m£Kin L;OUm~, State of Colorado, at a duly and lawfully
called regutar meeting held on ."~' /. ~ ._/._~.._;~ at which meeting there were present tho following
with notice of such meeting and an opo~j:ttE~lbL.t~.jbe, pmsent having been given to the taxpayer and
sald County and Assessor Tom lsaac~;-ei~of prasenf) and the Assessor of
petitioner _. ~ama
Name (being ptesa~ and WHERF_AS, The said
County Ccmmlsstoners have ca[orally d ' .petit~an, and ere fu y advised in relation thereto NOW
SE IT RESOLVED, That the '~ma~$wtth tlie re
~n~d the petition be (appro,,..~x.~,-=~-"~--~ - - -~- -- commsndaticn of the assessor
I::hsl~/Pe~on oflha Beard of Cfl~jlty C~'rnml~alonlra elgn.tum
IN' W c~v 'E?"S WH EREOF~h~e hemunt~ set'[]:~and and affixed the fs Id
-'----'--
Denver, Colorado
The action of the Boar of County Commissioners, relative ~o the withl~ patiUon, is hereby
gApproved; D Approved In part $ [ ~ D~nled far the following reason(s):
PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES u'
Pi'ease submit tn ~ copies and anSWer ail queafJoos.
Pltldn County '
Date Received
PEH HONER: Compreta Section ! on this side only
,~ectlop t;
Date: ,~?['T ,~. ;;~¢0/-
Petiti~ner's Name: __ ~ T'][/%~T- {d.[ .
Petitioner's Mailing Address:., ~ ~Y- 7Q ? ,~
Clly or Town
SCHEDULE OR PARCEL NUMBER(E) PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
'2 ,~, af4~~ cc
Petitioner states that [he taxes assessed age,st the above property for property tax 'ear .Tt,~d I
the following masons- (Briefly descflbe the clmum~.;ar -- . Y --. '
sheets ~f necessary .~ - ~ces surmunotng the Incon'e~t value or tax. are Incorrect for
Detitleneds estfrnate of actual value must be Include! ) Affach additional
7'-H~""A cCl%' A I; T'l~ e- ~ t (:~ "; c'e ,~ f'/t ~ ~n,, Wrl ,'~'~.~5~ 5 d~/ /r V E7~ ,~
Value Year ,/Ir/f/ ~) .~-~,l c / /._.l~
Petitioner requests an abatement or refund of the sp~mprfate taxes associated with a
' declare, under penalty of perjury In the second de m,· r~dWu'v'J~u~~
~,O~'
or statE.ants, has beE. exar. i.~d ......... [~.~a t.h~ !his. Oetl~oo, together with a~y a
and COmplete. / b~ m~. o,,,~ ~u ~ne DSSl at my ~nOWledoe I-~-~-- ~ .cc~..mpany~ng exhlblt~
%~.j/~ ............ on aha o,,ef, Is flue,
By_
Agent's 81gnat[ia* Daytime Phone Number£
· Letter of agency must be affaChed when Petition Is subm~ed.
Every petition for abatement or refund filed oursuant to section 39-10-114, C.R S., shall ba acted
the provisions of thfs section by the board of county COmmissioners or the assessor as seem ri,~On P~ant to
r,;~n[i~s u~' the date cf fl'ting such petition 3g-1-113(1 7), C.R.S.·.p., wfth n
Assessed Value Tax
OriginaJ
Coo'ecl:ed
Ab~te/P. efun d'
ABATEMENT RECOMMENDATION
FROM THE APPRAISER
ASSESSOR GENERATED __
- TAXPAYER GENERATED_ X
To: Tom Isaac, Pit, kin County Assessor
From:' MA_n,,q ~;7~lrek
Date: 12/03/02
Pet/tioner: ShJ=,rt H Tuhi,
Schedule #: R003005
Parcel ~. _ 273-r~JRltllCJ~R
The appraiser has completed a review of the referenced property, as of this date, and hereby submits a
recommendation as stated below:.
__ X Denial
- -- Approved as Submitted
Abatement/Refund Different Ihan requested
Assessment Rate: __
Year #1 for 20
-- Year fY2 for 20
Tax area _ Mill Levy _ Tax area _ Mill Levy_
Assessed Value Tax Amount
Assessed Value Tax Amount
Orlg: $ $
$ $
Corrected: $ $
$ $
Abate/refund $ $
$ $
THE BASIS OF THIS RECOMMENDATION IS:
Lot # 32(sate) and lot # 27(subject) have the same land code therefore the same value according to our
records. Lot # 32 may be bigger than lot # 27 but we feel they are comparable properties because lot 27
has views of Mount Daly and the ski area while the comparable does not. As for the height restrictions
many other properties within the subdivision also have a restriction, yet their values have not been
changed. A lots value does not chang~,,based on height restriction. Therefore
is denied on the basis that the sale o~mparabie lot # 32 is a good indication this petition for abatement
of value for lot # 27.
P.O. Box 7078
'rahoe City, Ca. 96[45
November 27, 2003
Pltkl,, Couuty TreasUrer/iss~:ssor
506 E. MaLn Street, suite 2ll
Aspen, Colorado 8;6[1-1993
Re: Sub Counlrv Clull Uuit [ [~H' 2Z, sche,lul~RO0~ll)~)5
primari [y ~poa the ~ast sale, and apparantly the oniy
one im their sub-unit iu the pa'st few years.
You [orwa~ded my inquiry to the Assessor's Off,ce
it to the A~sessor's Office, but [ ha,'e beard nothing
in reply. Meanwh} le [ am having to pay a tax which
I would appreciate your reply in this matter.
~hanking ~ou in adramce,
Since~l Y~ou[s,
StUart I~. Iabis