HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.con.003.228/30/2021 CDD
Contract Information
Contract Number
Project Name
Contractor
Budget Line Item Per Individual Task Order
Procurement Method:
Type:
Contract Start Date
Contract End Date
Contract Type
Retainage
If this is a new contractor, please enter the New Vendor information into Munis for workflow approval.
Contact Information:
Department
County Representative Dan Bartholomew County Representative
Phone (970) 429-2851
Provide a brief description of the Contract or Change Order:
Contract Value Summary:
Airport
Project management and supporting services for the updating of the ASE Airport Layout Plan from project kick-
off through approval and acceptance by the FAA and other applicable authorities.
Original Contract Amount
Previous Change Order/Amendment Amount
This Change order/Amendment amount
Contract Total
Per Task
Order
No
ASE Airport Layout Plan Update
Jacobsen | Daniels, LLC
$-
Additional Budget Line
Item(s)
(Please fully allocate New Contract Total)
$-
$-
$-
$-
Formal
Services/Maintenance
4/01/2022
3/31/2023
Master Service Agreement
003.22
Pitkin County
Procurement Cover Sheet
Please complete the Contract Cover Sheet when the contract/task order is complete and fully executed.
Return all Contract Cover Sheets and Contracts/Change Orders/Amendments/Task Orders to Procurement
Pitkin County RFQ # 003.22 Rev. 2022-03-14 CDD
Federally and Locally Funded
NOTICE OF AWARD
Date: April 1, 2022
To: Jacobsen | Daniels, LLC
Brad Jacobsen, Executive Vice President / COO
121 Pearl Street
Ypsilanti, MI 48197
RE: RFQ 003.22 - Updated Airport Layout Plan and Narrative Report for the
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
The County, having duly considered the Qualifications submitted on November 30, 2021
for the work or purchase covered by the Contract Document titled RFQ 003.22 - Updated
Airport Layout Plan and Narrative Report for the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport, hereby
accepts your qualifications and, finding your organizations’ qualifications and approach
to the project to be in the best interest of Pitkin County and ASE, issues this notice of
award. Work shall be performed in accordance with the amounts spelled out in
individually issued, mutually agreed/signed task orders and per the billable rates provided
in the Master Service Agreement.
Upon execution of this (these) documents, please submit certificate(s) of insurance as
stated and per the required minimums in the Master Service Agreement Document to
Procurement via email at procurement@pitkincounty.com.
PITKIN COUNTY
________________________________________________
!#COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE#! Date
ACCEPTANCE BY JACOBSEN | DANIELS, LLC
Receipt of the above Notice of Award is hereby acknowledged
________________________________________________
!#VENDOR SIGNATURE#! Date
Airport Director
Apr-04-2022
Dan Bartholomew
Apr-06-2022
Brad Jacobsen
Executive Vice President
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
1
MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR THE ASE AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (“ALP”)
UPDATE SERVICES
THIS MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), is made and entered by and between
the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, 530 E. Main St., Suite #302,
Aspen, CO 81611, (“County”) and Jacobsen Daniels, LLC, 121 Pearl Street, Ypsilanti, MI 48197
(hereinafter called the “Contractor”).
I. Term of Contract: The term of this Agreement is from April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023.
At the expiration of the initial term, the contract may be extended for three (3)
additional terms of one (1) year by the express written consent of both parties.
II. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor shall provide project oversight, management of
deliverables, and communications support for the ASE Updated Airport Layout Plan
as set forth herein and as set forth in subsequent, individual Task Orders, which Task
Orders shall be made a part of this Agreement upon execution by the County and the
Contractor. Contractor shall complete the scope of work as defined in the individual
Task Orders issued by the County and agreed upon by Contractor. The Contractor shall
work in conjunction with other project(s) members including but not limited to: Airport
representatives and other County Departments/Divisions, the Contractor’s/County’s
subcontractors, specialty contractors, if any, hired by the County as part of the
Project(s) under this Agreement, any and all state and local governmental agencies,
including, but not limited to, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT). The County and the Contractor agree as this
Contract is federally funded, it is therefore subject to the requirements set forth in Title
49 CFR Part 18.36.
The scope of services shall be defined on a per Task Order basis and will vary
accordingly. In general, all services and/or phases of assigned projects will require
close interaction and coordination with the Aspen Pitkin County Airport (“Airport”)
Staff, airport contractors as directed, airport tenants and other stakeholders, external
agencies, and local, regional, and/or national Federal Aviation Administration
(“FAA”), Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) and Colorado Department
of Transportation (“CDOT”) offices as required. Consultant will be responsible for
compliance with all applicable TSA and FAA Advisory Circulars, Orders, and other
airport and regulatory guidance documents as well as all federal, state, and local laws.
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
2
Additional scoping narrative and expectations for delivery schedule are provided in
Attachment A (RFQ Documents) and Attachment B (J | D Qualifications Documents).
Subcontractors other than those provided for herein or in any adjoining documentation
may be added by written agreement from both parties as a change order to this
Agreement or on a per-task order basis.
III. Compensation and Expenses, Invoicing, Payment and Offset. This Agreement is
funded in part through grant funds the County will receive through the FAA. The
County shall compensate Contractor for its services in accordance with the Project
Budgets and Schedules set out in the Task Orders. It is expressly understood and agreed
that in no event will the total compensation and reimbursement to be paid hereunder
exceed the sum(s) as defined in individual Task Orders. By Task Order or Task Order
Amendment, the County and Contractor may reallocate the budget among project tasks
if the total budget amount remains unchanged. Contractor shall invoice for the project
monthly based on hours worked, with payment expected within thirty (30) days of
invoice, but any payment by the County may be offset by any amount the Contractor
owes the County for any reason.
Invoicing and payment shall be consistent with the hourly rates as provided below.
Contractor is expected to assess and responsibly assign workloads to staff members for
tasks consistent with associated disciplines in order to deliver a quality work product
without overburdening the County with inflated hourly rates.
Hourly Billable Rates
Title/Position: 2022 Rate: 2023 Rate: 2024 Rate:
Managing Partner $ 360.00 $ 378.00 $ 397.00
Vice President $ 325.00 $ 341.00 $ 358.00
Director $ 300.00 $ 315.00 $ 331.00
Managing Consultant $ 275.00 $ 289.00 $ 303.00
Senior Consultant $ 225.00 $ 236.00 $ 248.00
Consultant $ 175.00 $ 184.00 $ 193.00
Analyst/Technical Assistant $ 150.00 $ 158.00 $ 165.00
Administrative Support $ 125.00 $ 131.00 $ 138.00
IV. County’s Exclusive Ownership of Work Product. Drawings, specifications, guidelines
and other documents prepared by Contractor in connection with this Agreement shall
be the property of the County. However, Contractor shall have the right to utilize such
documents in the course of its marketing, professional presentations, and for other
business purposes. Contractor assigns to County the copyrights to all work prepared,
developed, or created pursuant to this Agreement, including the right to: 1) reproduce
the work; 2) prepare derivative works; 3) distribute copies to the public; 4) perform the
works publicly; and 5) to display the work publicly. Contractor shall have right to use
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
3
materials produced in the course of this Agreement for marketing purposes and
professional presentations, articles, speeches and other business purposes. Any
modifications made by the County to any of the Contractor’s documents, or any use,
partial use, or reuse of the documents without written authorization or adaption by the
Contractor will be at the County’s sole risk and without liability to the Contractor.
V. Pitkin County’s Obligations. Pitkin County shall administer this Agreement
through a County Representative identified in the individual Task Orders. The services
provided and products delivered by the Contractor under this Agreement will be subject
to review by the County’s Representatives, or a designee, for compliance with
Contractor’s obligations prior to final payment.
VI. Termination Prior to Expiration of Contract Term. The County has the right to
terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the
Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. Such notice
shall be given at least ten (10) days before the effective date of such termination. In
such event all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies and reports prepared by
the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall become the County’s property.
Contractor shall be entitled to receive compensation in accordance with the Agreement
for any satisfactory work completed pursuant to the terms of this Contract prior to the
date of termination. Notwithstanding the above, Contractor shall not be relieved of
liability to the County for damages sustained by the County by virtue of any breach of
the contract by the Contractor.
VII. Independent Contractor Status.
A. The parties to this Agreement intend that the relationship between them
contemplated by the Agreement is that of independent contractor. Contractor, and
any agent, employee, or servant of Contractor shall not be deemed to be an
employee, agent, or servant of Pitkin County.
B. Contractor is not required to offer his services exclusively to Pitkin County under
this Agreement. Contractor may choose to work for other individuals or entities
during the term of this contract, provided that the basic services and deliverable
products required under this Agreement are submitted in the manner and on the
schedule defined under this Agreement.
C. Contractor warrants that all work produced will conform to all applicable industry
standard of care, skill and diligence in the performance of Contractor’s obligations
under this Agreement. As used herein, the term “Standard of Care” refers to the
required standard for the Services to be provided by the Contractor. All Services
provided by the Contractor shall comply with the requirements of any and all laws,
codes, ordinances, rules and regulations applicable to the project, the proposed
Scope of Work or promulgated by any federal, state and local Authority Having
Jurisdiction (“AHJ”) regarding the project and/or task. The Services shall fulfill
the degree of skill and care that would be used by a similar contractor working on
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
4
similar projects in the state of Colorado. All instruments of service provided by the
Contractor must clearly and accurately indicate or illustrate all essential points of
the work to which they refer. The County’s knowledge or approval of the
Contractor’s use of any subcontractor to perform any portions of Services required
for under this contract shall not relieve, release or absolve the Contractor of its
responsibility for all Services provided pursuant to this Agreement. As may be
applicable, the Contractor represents that it and each of its subcontractors shall be
properly licensed in the jurisdiction of the projects or tasks and legally authorized
to perform the Services to be provided by them. Further, the Contractor agrees that
each of its employees and the employees of its subcontractor shall be qualified to
perform the Services assigned to them in the performance of this Contract. At any
time, and without any additional cost or expense to the County, the County may
reject any subcontractors, vendors, suppliers and agents used by the Contractor to
perform any portion of the work or services, and the same shall be immediately
replaced with a replacement acceptable to the County as determined by its Airport
Director or his designee.
D. Contractor shall not attempt to oversee or supervise the work or actions of any
Pitkin County employee, servant or agent in the course of completing work under
this Agreement.
E. Contractor is not entitled to any Workers’ Compensation benefits through Pitkin
County and is responsible for payment of any federal, state, FICA and other income
taxes.
VIII. Assignability. This Agreement is not assignable by either party. Any use of
subcontractors by the Contractor for performance of this Agreement must be accepted
in writing by the County.
IX. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be
invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain valid
and binding upon the parties hereto.
X. Integration and Modification.
A. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the
County and the Contractor and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or
Agreement, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written
Agreement signed by both the County and the Contractor.
B. The County may, from time to time, request changes in the scope of services of the
Contractor to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including the increase or
decrease in the amount of the Contractor’s compensation, which are mutually
agreed upon between the County and the Contractor, shall be in writing and upon
execution shall become part of this Agreement.
XI. Indemnity.
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
5
A. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and, not excluding the County's
right to participate, defend the County, its subsidiary, parent, associated and/or
affiliated entities, successors, or assigns, its elected officials, trustees, employees,
agents, volunteers, and any jurisdiction or agency issuing permits for any work
included in the project,, hereinafter referred to as indemnitee, from all suits and
claims, including attorney's fees and cost of litigation, actions, loss, damage,
expense, cost or claims of any character or any nature, to the extent arising out of
the negligent acts, errors, and omissions of the Contractor, in fulfillment of the
terms of this Agreement or on account of any act, claim or amount arising or
recovered under workers' compensation law or arising out of the failure of the
Contractor to conform to any statutes, ordinances, regulation, law or court decree.
It is agreed that the Contractor will be responsible for primary loss investigation,
defense and judgment costs where this Agreement of indemnity applies. In
consideration of the award of this Agreement, the Contractor agrees to waive all
rights of subrogation against the County its subsidiary, parent, associated and/or
affiliated entities, successors, or assigns, its elected officials, trustees, employees,
agents, and volunteers for losses arising from the work performed by the Contractor
for the County.
XII. Insurance. Contractor and subcontractors shall procure and maintain until all of their
obligations have been discharged, including any warranty periods under this
Agreement are satisfied, insurance against claims for injury to persons or damage to
property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work
hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
The insurance requirements herein are minimum requirements for this Agreement and
in no way limit the indemnity covenants contained in this Agreement.
The County in no way warrants that the minimum limits contained herein are sufficient
to protect the Contractor from liabilities that might arise out of the performance of the
work under this Agreement by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees,
or subcontractors. The Contractor shall assess its own risks and if it deems appropriate
and/or prudent, maintain higher limits and/or broader coverages. The Contractor is not
relieved of any liability or other obligations assumed or pursuant to the Agreement by
reason of its failure to obtain or maintain insurance in sufficient amounts, duration, or
types.
A. Coverage and Limits of Insurance. Coverage and Limits of Insurance. Contractor
shall provide coverage with limits of liability not less than those stated below. An
umbrella and/or excess liability policy may be used to meet the minimum liability
requirements provided that the coverage is written on a “following form” basis.
1) Statutory Workers’ Compensation: Colorado statutory minimums
a. Policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation against the County.
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
6
b. This requirement shall not apply when a contractor or subcontractor
is exempt under Colorado Workers’ Compensation Act AND when
such contractor or subcontractor executes the appropriate sole
proprietor waiver form.
Minimum Limits:
Coverage A (Workers’ Compensation) Statutory
Coverage B (Employers Liability)
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
2) Commercial General Liability – ISO 1CG 0001 form or equivalent.
(With County named as an additional insured)
Minimum Limits:
General Aggregate $ 2,000,000
Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $ 2,000,000
Each Occurrence Limit $ 1,000,000
Personal/Advertising Injury $ 1,000,000
Fire Damage (Any One Fire) $ 50,000
Medical Payments (Any One Person) $ 5,000
Coverage to include:
Premises and Operations
Explosions, Collapse and Underground Hazards
Personal / Advertising Injury
Products / Completed Operations
Liability assumed under an Insured Contract (including defense costs assumed under
contract)
Independent Contractors
Designated Construction Project(s) General Aggregate Limit, ISO CG 2503 (1997
Edition) or equivalent
Additional Insured—Owners, Lessees or Contractors Endorsement, ISO Form 2010
(2004 Edition) or equivalent
Additional Insured—Owners, Lessees or Contractors Endorsement, ISO CG 2037
(2004 Edition) or equivalent
The policy shall be endorsed to include the following additional insured language
on the Additional Insured Endorsements specified above: “County, its subsidiary,
parent, associated and/or affiliated entities, successors, or assigns, its elected
officials, trustees, employees, agents, and volunteers named as an additional insured
with respect to liability and defense of suits arising out of the activities performed
by, or on behalf of the Contractor, including completed operations”.
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
7
3) Auto Liability: Bodily injury and property damage for any owned,
hired and non-owned vehicles used in the performance of this Contract.
Minimum Limits: Statutory
Coverage Bodily/Property Damage (Each Accident)
$ 1,000,000
4) Special Coverages (check as appropriate and insert amount):
a. ☐ Performance Bond $
b. ☐ Professional Errors and Omissions
c. ☐ Aircraft Liability
d. ☐ Owner’s Protective
e. ☐ Builder’s Risk
f. ☐ Boiler and Machinery
g. ☐ Loss of Use Insurance
h. ☐ Pollution Liability
i. ☐ Crime, including Employee Dishonesty Coverage, or Fidelity
Bond
B. Proof of Insurance:
1) Each insurance policy required by the insurance provisions of this
Agreement shall provide the required coverage and shall not be suspended,
voided or canceled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been
given to the County, except when cancellation is for non-payment of
premium, then ten (10) days prior notice may be given. Such notice shall
be emailed directly to Procurement@pitkincounty.com. If the insurance
carrier will not provide the required notice, the Consultant/Contractor and
or its insurance broker shall notify the County of any cancellation, or
reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance within seven (7) days of
receipt of insurers’ notification to that effect. Simultaneously with the
Certificates of Insurance, the Contractor shall file with the Procurement
Officer a certified statement as to claims pending against the required
coverages, reserves established on account of such claims, defense costs
expended and amounts remaining on policy limits.
2) In addition, these Certificates of Insurance shall contain the following
clauses:
a. The contractor’s insurance shall be primary and non-contributory with
any insurance or self-insurance purchased by the County.
b. The insurance companies issuing the policy or policies hereunder shall
have no recourse against the County of Pitkin for payment of any
premiums or for assessments under any form of policy.
c. Any and all deductibles or self-insured retentions in the above-
described insurance policies shall be assumed by and be for the
amount of, and at the sole expense of the Contractor.
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
8
d. Location of operations shall be: “all operations and locations at which
work for the referenced Project is being done.”
3) Certificates of Insurance for all renewal policies shall be delivered to
the Procurement Officer at least fifteen (15) days prior to a policy’s expiration
date except for any policy expiring on the expiration date of this contract or
thereafter.
4) The County reserves the right to request and receive a copy of any
policy and any policy endorsement at any time during the term of this
Agreement.
XIII. Exemptions and Preferences. All purchases of construction or building or any other
materials for this Agreement shall not include Federal Excise Taxes or Colorado State or
local sales or use taxes. Pitkin County is exempt from such taxes under registration
numbers 98-02624 and 84-78000-5k.
XIV. Records. The Contractor shall maintain comprehensive, complete and accurate
books, records, and documents concerning its performance relating to this Agreement
for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement and the County
shall have the right within the three (3) year period to inspect and audit these books,
records and documents, upon demand, in a reasonable manner and at reasonable times,
for the purpose of determining, by accepted accounting and auditing standards,
compliance with all provisions of the Agreement and applicable law.
XV. Contract Made in Colorado. The parties agree that this Agreement was made in
accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and shall be so construed. Venue is
agreed to be exclusively in the courts of Pitkin County, Colorado.
XVI. Submittals for Agency Reviews. As applicable, any and all documents prepared as
part of the services furnished pursuant to this Contract shall be submitted to the County
for review and approval prior to transmittal to other regulatory agencies or AHJ.
Specifically, the Contractor agrees:
A. That any facility to be used in the performance of this Contract is not listed on the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) List of Violating Facilities;
B. To comply with all the requirements of Section 114 of the Clean Air Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq. and Section 308 of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. relating to inspection, monitoring,
entry, reports, and information, as well as all other requirements specified in
Section 114 and Section 308 of the Acts, respectively, and all other regulations and
guidelines issued thereunder; and
C. That, as a condition for the award of this Contract, the Contractor will notify the
awarding official of the receipt of any communication from the EPA indicating that
a facility to be used for the performance of or benefit from the Contract is under
consideration to be listed on the EPA List of Violating Facilities.
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
9
XVII. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that legal action is necessary to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs
and reasonable attorney’s fees.
XVIII. Governmental Immunity. Contractor agrees and understands that Pitkin County is
relying on and does not waive, by any provision of this Agreement, the monetary
limitations or terms (presently $150,000 per person and $600,000 per occurrence) or
any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental
Immunity Act, 24-10-101, et seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or otherwise
available to Pitkin County or any of its officers, agents or employees. Further, nothing
in this Agreement shall be construed or interpreted to require or provide for
indemnification of the Contractor by the County for any injury to any person or any
property damage whatsoever which is caused by the negligence or other misconduct of
the County or its agent or employees.
XIX. Current Year Obligations. The parties acknowledge and agree that any payments
provided for hereunder or requirements for future appropriations shall constitute only
currently budgeted expenditures of Pitkin County. Pitkin County’s obligations under
this contract are subject to Pitkin County’s annual right to budget and appropriate the
sums necessary to provide the services set forth herein. No provisions of the contract
shall constitute a mandatory charge or requirement in any ensuing fiscal year beyond
the then current fiscal year of Pitkin County. No provision of the contract shall be
construed or interpreted as creating a multiple-fiscal year direct or indirect debt or other
financial obligation of Pitkin County within the meaning of any constitutional or
statutory debt limitation. This contract shall not directly or indirectly obligate Pitkin
County to make any payments beyond those appropriated for Pitkin County’s then
current fiscal year. No provisions of this contract shall be construed to pledge or create
a lien on any class or source of Pitkin County’s moneys, nor shall any provision of this
contract restrict the future issuance of Pitkin County’s bonds or any obligations payable
from any class or source of Pitkin County’s money.
XX. Accounting Practices.
A. The Contractor must follow standard accounting practices for a “not-to-exceed”
or lump sum contract agreement, as well as accounting practices and document
retention procedures required by the Department of Transportation Title 49, CFR
Part 21. The Contractor shall permit a representative of the County or the Federal
Aviation Administration to inspect its Project books and records at any time. Such
records are to be kept available for six (6) years from the date of the final payment
for Services performed pursuant to this Contract.
B. The County and the Federal Aviation Administration shall have the right to audit
the Contractor’s records pertaining to the Services performed pursuant to this
Contract at any time. The County’s audit rights include, but are not limited to,
inspecting records to verify personnel hours (by payroll classification, billing rate
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
10
or direct hours) spent on the projects, DBE participation activities, all invoices for
Reimbursable Expenses (whether by the Contractor or any subcontractors) and
overhead rates and charges.
C. The Contractor shall maintain an acceptable cost accounting system. The
Contractor agrees to provide the County, the Federal Aviation Administration and
the Comptroller General of the United States or any of their duly authorized
representatives access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the
contractor which are directly pertinent to the specific contract for the purpose of
making audit, examination, excerpts and transcriptions. The Contractor agrees to
maintain all books, records and reports required under this Contract for a period
of not less than six (6) years after final payment is made and all pending matters
are closed.
XXI. Notice. Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing
and shall be provided by electronic delivery to the e-mail addresses set forth below and
by one of the following methods 1) hand-delivery or 2) registered or certified mail,
postage pre-paid to the mailing addresses set forth below. Each party by notice sent
under this paragraph may change the address to which future notices should be sent.
Electronic delivery of notices shall be considered delivered upon receipt of
confirmation of delivery on the part of the sender. Nothing contained herein shall be
construed to preclude personal service of any notice in the manner prescribed for
personal service of a summons or other legal process.
To Pitkin County:
Pitkin County Procurement
530 E. Main St., Suite #304
Aspen, CO 81611
Procurement@PitkinCounty.com
with copies to:
Pitkin County Attorney’s Office
530 E. Main St., Suite #301
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Attorney@pitkincounty.com
To Contractor:
Jacobsen | Daniels, LLC
121 Pearl Street
Ypsilanti, MI 48197
Phone: (734) 961-3200
Email: Brad.Jacobsen@JacobsenDaniels.com
XXII. Public Contracts for Services and Public Contracts with Natural Persons. In
conformance with the provisions of C.R.S. §§ 8-17.5-101, et seq., as amended and
C.R.S. §§ 24-76.5-101, et seq., as amended:
A. PUBLIC CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES. §§8-17.5-101, et seq. C.R.S.
[Not applicable to agreements relating to the offer, issuance, or sale of securities,
investment advisory services or fund management services, sponsored projects,
intergovernmental agreements, or information technology services or products and
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
11
services] Contractor certifies, warrants, and agrees that it does not knowingly employ
or contract with an illegal alien who will perform work under this Agreement and will
confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired for
employment in the United States to perform work under this Agreement, through
participation in the E-Verify Program established under Pub. L. 104-208 or the State
verification program established pursuant to §8-17.5-102(5)(c), C.R.S., Contractor
shall not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien to perform work under this
Agreement or enter into a contract with a Subcontractor that fails to certify to
Contractor that the Subcontractor shall not knowingly employ or contract with an
illegal alien to perform work under this Agreement. Contractor (i) shall not use E-
Verify Program or State program procedures to undertake pre-employment screening
of job applicants while this Agreement is being performed, (ii) shall notify the
Subcontractor and the contracting State agency within 3 days if Contractor has actual
knowledge that a Subcontractor is employing or contracting with an illegal alien for
work under this Agreement, (iii) shall terminate the subcontract if a Subcontractor does
not stop employing or contracting with the illegal alien within 3 days of receiving the
notice, and (iv) shall comply with reasonable requests made in the course of an
investigation, undertaken pursuant to §8-17.5-102(5), C.R.S., by the Colorado
Department of Labor and Employment. If Contractor participates in the State program,
Contractor shall deliver to the contracting State agency, Institution of Higher Education
or political subdivision, a written, notarized affirmation, affirming that Contractor has
examined the legal work status of such employee, and shall comply with all of the other
requirements of the State program. If Contractor fails to comply with any requirement
of this provision or §§8-17.5-101 et seq., C.R.S., the contracting State agency,
institution of higher education or political subdivision may terminate this Agreement
for breach and, if so terminated, Contractor shall be liable for damages.
B. PUBLIC CONTRACTS WITH NATURAL PERSONS. §§24-76.5-101, et seq.,
C.R.S.
Contractor, if a natural person 18 years of age or older, hereby swears and affirms under
penalty of perjury that he or she (i) is a citizen or otherwise lawfully present in the
United States pursuant to federal law, (ii) shall comply with the provisions of §§24-
76.5-101 et seq., C.R.S., and (iii) has produced one form of identification required by
§24-76.5-103, C.R.S. prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement.
XXIII. Confidentiality. The Contractor agrees that any information the Contractor receives or
reviews concerning the County or the Airport, including, but not limited to, any
information concerning the County or Airport’s past, present and future research,
development, operations and business activities, and any other information or material
proprietary to the County of which the Contractor may obtain knowledge or access
from the County during the Contractor’s performance hereunder (hereinafter
“Confidential Information”) is proprietary and confidential to the County. The
Contractor agrees, on behalf of itself and all of its agents, to hold in confidence and not
to directly or indirectly reveal, report, publish, disclose or transfer any of the
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
12
Confidential Information to any person or entity, or utilize any of the Confidential
Information for any purpose, except as may be agreed in writing in advance between
the County and the Contractor. Prior to disclosure of Confidential Information to any
of its employees or other authorized persons or subcontractors, the Contractor agrees
to obtain an appropriate agreement, containing all of the elements set forth herein, from
those persons or firms to whom such information is disclosed or who otherwise gain
access to such information to maintain the confidentiality of Confidential Information.
The Contractor further agrees to indemnify the County against any and all liability,
loss, cost, legal or other professional fees resulting from, or arising in connection with,
unauthorized use or disclosure of Confidential Information by the Contractor, its
employees or any other authorized person to whom the Contractor has disclosed
Confidential Information.
XXIV. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE).
A. This Contract will be funded in part or in whole by one or more grants from the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Program (AIP) and
this Project must comply with the FAA and United States Department of
Transportation (USDOT) Rule 49 CFR Part 26 pertaining to compliance with DBE
requirements.
B. Projects receiving such funding must comply with USDOT Code of Federal
Regulations 49 CFR Part 26, and with the County's Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise Program. The Contractor agrees that it shall not discriminate on the
basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this Contract. The
Contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award
and administration of USDOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the Contractor to carry
out these requirements is a material breach of this Contract, which may result in the
termination of this contract or such other remedy as the County may deem
appropriate.
The Contractor has committed to Two and Six-Tenths percent (2.6%) DBE
Participation.
C. Contract Assurances. The following clauses pertaining to compliance with 49 CFR
Part 26 are incorporated into and are a part of this Contract, and are hereby
incorporated into the terms of the Contractor's solicitations, subcontracts, material
supply contracts and purchase orders.
1) Compliance monitoring will be conducted to determine if the Contractor
and its subcontractors are complying with the requirements of the DBE Program.
Failure of the Contractor to comply with this provision may result in the County
imposing penalties or sanctions pursuant to the provisions of the DBE regulation,
49 CFR Part 26. Contract compliance will encompass monitoring for contract
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
13
dollar achievement and DBE utilization. The County’s authorized representative
shall have the authority to audit and monitor this Contract.
2) The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring proper documentation with
regard to its utilization and payment of DBE subcontractors.
3) The Contractor agrees to submit a monthly report on DBE participation,
which shall contain a record of payments made to its DBE subcontractors.
4) The Contractor agrees to submit a final DBE report containing the total
amount paid to its DBE subcontractors. This report must be submitted with the
Contractor's request for final payment.
D. Nondiscrimination – The Contractor or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the
basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this Contract. The
Contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award
and administration of USDOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the Contractor to carry
out these requirements is a material breach of this Contract, which may result in the
termination of this contract or such other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate.
E. Prompt Payment – The Contractor hereby agrees to pay its DBE subcontractors,
subcontractors and suppliers within thirty (30) calendar days following receipt of
payment from the County for work satisfactorily completed by the subcontractors.
Further, if Contractor has withheld retainage from its DBE subcontractors,
subcontractors and suppliers, it shall release and pay such retainage within thirty
(30) calendar days of the date the work was satisfactorily completed if County did
not withhold retainage from Contractor or within thirty (30) calendar days after
receipt of payment of the retained amounts from County. A finding of nonpayment
to subcontractors and suppliers is a material breach of this Contract.
XXV. Waiver of Default. No waiver by the Parties hereto of any default or breach of
any term, condition, or covenant of this Contract will be deemed to be a waiver of any
subsequent default or breach of the same or of any other term, condition, or covenant
contained herein.
XXVI. Federal Government Agreements. This Contract is subordinate to the provisions
of any existing or future agreements between the County and the United States of
America relative to the operation and maintenance of the Airport, the execution of
which has been or may be required as a condition precedent to the expenditure of
federal funds for the development of the Airport.
XXVII. National Emergency. All provisions of this Contract are subordinate to the right of
the United States of America to lease or otherwise assume control of the Airport, or
any part thereof, during time of war or national emergency, for military use, and any
provisions of this Contract inconsistent with the provisions of such agreement with the
United States of America will be suspended thereby.
XXVIII. Successors and Assignment. The terms, conditions, and covenants contained in
this Contract apply and inure to the benefit of, and are binding upon the Parties hereto
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
14
and their respective successors in interest and legal representatives, except as otherwise
herein expressly provided. All rights, powers, privileges, immunities and duties of the
County under this Contract including, but not limited to, any notices required or
permitted to be delivered by the County to the Contractor hereunder may, at the
County’s option, be exercised or performed by the County’s agent or attorney,
including but not limited to its Airport Director. The Contractor may not assign its
rights, interests or obligations under this Contract without the prior and express written
consent of the County. The Contractor agrees the work and Services to be furnished to
the County are of a unique and specialized character, and the County may otherwise
object to and reject any proposed assignment as the County deems fit.
XXIX. Title VI Clauses for Compliance with Nondiscrimination Requirements (FAA
Provision A6.3.2). During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its
assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the “contractor”), if not
already subject to nondiscrimination requirements, agrees as follows:
A. Compliance with Regulations: The contractor (hereinafter includes consultants)
will comply with the Title VI List of Pertinent Nondiscrimination Acts And
Authorities, as they may be amended from time to time, which are herein
incorporated by reference and made a part of this Contract.
B. Non-discrimination: The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during
the contract, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin
in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of
materials and leases of equipment. The contractor will not participate directly or
indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Nondiscrimination Acts and
Authorities, including employment practices when the contract covers any activity,
project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR part 21.
C. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and
Equipment: In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding, or negotiation made
by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including
procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or
supplier will be notified by the contractor of the contractor’s obligations under this
contract and the Nondiscrimination Acts And Authorities on the grounds of race,
color, or national origin.
D. Information and Reports: The contractor will provide all information and reports
required by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto and
will permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and
its facilities as may be determined by the sponsor or the Federal Aviation
Administration to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
Nondiscrimination Acts And Authorities and instructions. Where any information
required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses
to furnish the information, the contractor will so certify to the sponsor or the Federal
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
15
Aviation Administration, as appropriate, and will set forth what efforts it has made
to obtain the information.
E. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of a contractor’s noncompliance with
the Non-discrimination provisions of this contract, the sponsor will impose such
contract sanctions as it or the Federal Aviation Administration may determine to be
appropriate, including, but not limited to:
1) Withholding payments to the Contractor under this Contract under the
Contractor complies; and/or
2) Cancelling, terminating, or suspending the Contract, in whole or in part.
F. Incorporation of Provisions: The Contractor will include the provisions of
paragraphs XXX.A through XXX.F in every subcontract, including procurements
of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts, the Regulations
and directives issued pursuant thereto. The Contractor will take action with respect
to any subcontract or procurement as the sponsor or the Federal Aviation
Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including
sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the contractor becomes involved in,
or is threatened with litigation by a subcontractor, or supplier because of such
direction, the Contractor may request the County to enter into any litigation to
protect the interests of the County. In addition, the contractor may request the
United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States.
XXX. Title VI List of Pertinent Non-discrimination Acts and Authorities (FAA Provision
A6.3.6). During the performance of this Contract, the Contractor, for itself, its
assignees, and successors in interest agrees to comply with the following non-
discrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to:
A. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252),
(prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin);
B. 49 CFR part 21 (Non-discrimination In Federally-Assisted Programs of The
Department of Transportation—Effectuation of Title VI of The Civil Rights Act of
1964);
C. The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of
1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or
whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and
projects);
D. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as
amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR part 27;
E. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.),
(prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
F. Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 USC § 471, Section 47123), as
amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or
sex);
G. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope,
coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age
Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
16
expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the
programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors,
whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not);
H. Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which prohibit
discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public
and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain
testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 – 12189) as implemented by Department of
Transportation regulations at 49 CFR parts 37 and 38;
I. The Federal Aviation Administration’s Non-discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. §
47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and
sex);
J. Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which ensures non-
discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies,
and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority and low-income populations;
K. Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited
English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination
includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure
compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP
persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100);
L. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you
from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C.
1681 et. seq).
XXXI. Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FAA Provision A16). This Contract and any sub-
contractor contract shall incorporate by reference the provisions of 29 CFR part 201,
the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), with the same force and effect as if given
in full text. The FLSA sets minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child
labor standards for full and part time workers.
The Contractor has full responsibility to monitor compliance to the referenced state or
regulation. The Contractor must address any claims or disputes that arise from this
requirement directly with the U.S. Department of Labor – Wage and Hour Division.
XXXII. Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (FAA Provision A19). This Contract
and any sub-contractor contract shall incorporate by reference the requirements of 29
CFR Part 1910 with the same force and effect as if given in full text. Contractor must
provide a work environment that is free from recognized hazards that may cause death
or serious physical harm to the employee. The Contractor retains full responsibility to
monitor its compliance and their subcontractor’s compliance with the applicable
requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (20 CFR Part 1910).
Contractor must address any claims or disputes that pertain to a referenced requirement
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
17
directly with the U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health
Administration.
XXXIII. General Civil Rights Provisions (FAA Provision A5). The Contractor agrees that it
will comply with pertinent statutes, Executive Orders and such rules as are promulgated
to ensure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, national origin, sex, age,
or disability be excluded from participating in any activity conducted with or benefiting
from Federal assistance. The provision binds the Contractor and sub-tier contractors
from the bid solicitation period through the completion of the Contract. This provision
is in addition to that required of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
XXXIV. Buy American Preference (FAA Provision A4). The Contractor agrees to comply
with 49 USC § 50101, which provides that Federal funds may not be obligated unless
all steel and manufactured goods used in AIP funded projects are produced in the
United States, unless the FAA has issued a waiver for the product; the product is listed
as an Excepted Article, Material Or Supply in Federal Acquisition Regulation subpart
25.108; or is included in the FAA Nationwide Buy American Waivers Issued list.
XXXV. Clean Air and Water Pollution Control (FAA Provision A7). Contractor agrees to
comply with all applicable standards, orders, and regulations issued pursuant to the
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 740-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
as amended (33 U.S.C. § 1251-1387). The Contractor agrees to report any violation to
the County immediately upon discovery. The County assumes responsibility for
notifying the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Aviation
Administration. Contractor must include this requirement in all subcontracts that
exceed $150,000.00.
XXXVI. Contract Workhours and Safety Standards Act Requirements (FAA Provision A8).
A. Overtime Requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of
the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or
mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic, including
watchmen and guards, in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such
work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or
mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the
basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek.
B. Violation; Liability for Unpaid Wages; Liquidated Damages. In the event of any
violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (A) of this Section, the contractor and
any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In
addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in
the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to
such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages
shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including
watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph
(A) of this Section, in the sum of $10 for each calendar day on which such
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
18
individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek
of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set
forth in paragraph (A) of this Section.
C. Withholding for Unpaid Wages and Liquidated Damages. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) or the County shall upon its own action or upon written
request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or
cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by
the Contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal
contract with the same prime contractor, or any other Federally-assisted contract
subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the
same prime contractor, such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy
any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated
damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph (B) of this Section.
D. Subcontractors. The Contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the
clauses set forth in paragraphs (A) through (D) and also a clause requiring the
subcontractor to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime
Contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier
subcontractor with the clauses set forth in paragraphs (A) through (D) of this
Section.
XXXVII. Debarment and Suspension. By signing this Contract the Contractor certifies that
neither it nor its principles are presently debarred or suspended by any Federal
department or agency from participation in this Contract.
A. The Contractor, by administering each lower tier subcontract that exceeds $25,000
as a “covered transaction”, must verify each lower tier participant of a “covered
transaction” under the project is not presently debarred or otherwise disqualified
from participation in this federally assisted project. The Contractor will accomplish
this by:
1) Checking the System for Award Management at website:
http://www.sam.gov;
2) Collecting a certification statement similar to the Certificate Regarding
Debarment and Suspension (Bidder or Offeror), above;
3) Inserting a clause or condition in the covered transaction with the lower tier
contract.
XXXVIII. Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (FAA Provision A18).
A. The Contractor agrees that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its
employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it does not
and will not permit its employees to perform their services at any location under its
control where segregated facilities are maintained. The Contractor agrees that a
breach of this clause is a violation of the Equal Opportunity clause in this Contract.
B. “Segregated facilities,” as used in this clause, means any waiting rooms, work
areas, rest rooms and wash rooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks,
locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains,
recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for
employees, that are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
19
basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin because of written or oral
policies or employee custom. The term does not include separate or single-user rest
rooms or necessary dressing or sleeping areas provided to assure privacy between
the sexes.
C. The Contractor shall include this clause in every subcontract and purchase order
that is subject to the Equal Opportunity clause of this Contract.
XXXIX. Access to Records and Reports (FAA Provision A1). The Contractor must maintain
an acceptable cost accounting system. The Contractor agrees to provide the County,
the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Comptroller General of the United States
or any of their duly authorized representatives, access to any books, documents, papers,
and records of the contractor which are directly pertinent to the specific contract for the
purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcriptions. The Contractor
agrees to maintain all books, records and reports required under this Contract for a
period of not less than three years after final payment is made and all pending matters
are closed.
XL. Affirmative Action Requirement (FAA Provision A2). Notice of Requirement for
Affirmative Action to Ensure Equal Employment Opportunity.
A. The Contractor’s attention is called to the “Equal Opportunity Clause” and the
“Standard Federal Equal Opportunity Construction Contract Specifications” set
forth herein.
B. The goals and timetables for minority and female participation, expressed in
percentage terms for the Contractor’s aggregate workforce in each trade on all
construction work in the covered area, are as follows:
1) Goals for minority participation for each trade: 32.3%
2) Goals for female participation in each trade: 6.9%
These goals are applicable to all of the Contractor's construction work (whether or
not it is Federal or federally-assisted) performed in the covered area. If the
Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the
covered area, it shall apply the goals established for such geographical area where
the work is actually performed. With regard to this second area, the contractor also
is subject to the goals for both its federally involved and non-federally involved
construction.
The Contractor's compliance with the Executive Order and the regulations in 41
CFR Part 60-4 shall be based on its implementation of the Equal Opportunity
Clause, specific affirmative action obligations required by the specifications set
forth in 41 CFR 60-4.3(a), and its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority
and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the
length of the contract, and in each trade, and the contractor shall make a good faith
effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer
of minority or female employees or trainees from contractor to contractor or from
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
20
project to project for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a
violation of the contract, the Executive Order and the regulations in 41 CFR Part 60-
4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours
performed.
C. The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Director of the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) within 10 working days of award
of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction
work under this Contract. The notification shall list the name, address, and
telephone number of the subcontractor; employer identification number of the
subcontractor; estimated dollar amount of the subcontract; estimated starting and
completion dates of the subcontract; and the geographical area in which the
subcontract is to be performed.
D. As used in this notice and in the contract resulting from this solicitation, the
"covered area" is Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado.
XLI. Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (FAA Provision A9). Contractor must comply with the
requirements of the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (18 U.S.C. 874 and 40 U.S.C.
3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulation 29 CFR part 3. Contractor
and subcontractors are prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed
on the project to give up any part of the compensation to which the employee is entitled.
The Contractor and each subcontractor must submit to the County, a weekly statement
on the wages paid to each employee performing on covered work during the prior week.
The County must report any violations of the Act to the Federal Aviation
Administration.
XLII. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (FAA Provision A12).
A. Contract Assurance (§ 26.13) - The contractor or subcontractor shall not
discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance
of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR
Part 26 in the award and administration of DOT assisted contracts. Failure by the
contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract,
which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy, as the
recipient deems appropriate.
B. Prompt Payment (§26.29) - The prime Contractor agrees to pay each subcontractor
under this prime contract for satisfactory performance of its contract no later than
ten (10) days from the receipt of each payment the prime contractor receives from
Pitkin County. The prime contractor agrees further to return retainage payments to
each subcontractor within ten (10) days after the subcontractor's work is
satisfactorily completed. Any delay or postponement of payment from the above
referenced time frame may occur only for good cause following written approval
of the County. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE subcontractors.
XLIII. Energy Conservation Requirements (FA Provision A14).Contractor and subcontractors
agree to comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency as
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
21
contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6201 et seq).
XLIV. Equal Opportunity Clause (FAA Provision A15).
A. The Contractor agrees as follows:
1) The Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The
Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed,
and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race,
color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identify or national origin. Such
action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading,
demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or
termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for
training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous
places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be
provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.
2) The Contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees
placed by or on behalf of the Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will
receive considerations for employment without regard to race, color, religion,
sex, or national origin.
3) The Contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers
with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or
understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers'
representatives of the Contractor's commitments under this Section, and shall post
copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants
for employment.
4) The Contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246
of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the
Secretary of Labor.
5) The Contractor will furnish all information and reports required by
Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and
orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his
books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of
Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules,
regulations, and orders.
6) In the event of the Contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination
clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this
contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the
contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or
federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures
authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other
sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
22
11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of
Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
7) The Contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately
preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every
subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of
the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246
of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each
subcontractor or vendor. The Contractor will take such action with respect to any
subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means
of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided,
however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with,
litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the
administering agency the contractor may request the United States to enter into
such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.
B. As used in these specifications:
1) “Covered area” means the geographical area described in the solicitation
from which this Contract resulted;
2) "Director" means Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance
Programs (OFCCP), U.S. Department of Labor, or any person to whom the
Director delegates authority;
3) "Employer identification number" means the Federal social security
number used on the Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return, U.S. Treasury
Department Form 941;
4) "Minority" includes:
a. Black (all persons having origins in any of the Black African racial
groups not of Hispanic origin);
b. Hispanic (all persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or
South American, or other Spanish culture or origin regardless of race);
c. Asian and Pacific Islander (all persons having origins in any of the
original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian
Subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands); and
d. American Indian or Alaskan native (all persons having origins in any
of the original peoples of North America and maintaining identifiable
tribal affiliations through membership and participation or community
identification).
C. Whenever the Contractor, or any subcontractor at any tier, subcontracts a portion
of the work involving any construction trade, it shall physically include in each
subcontract in excess of $10,000 the provisions of these specifications and the
Notice which contains the applicable goals for minority and female participation
and which is set forth in the solicitations from which this contract resulted.
D. If the Contractor is participating (pursuant to 41 CFR 60-4.5) in a Hometown Plan
approved by the U.S. Department of Labor in the covered area either individually
or through an association, its affirmative action obligations on all work in the Plan
area (including goals and timetables) shall be in accordance with that Plan for
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
23
those trades which have unions participating in the Plan. Contractors shall be able
to demonstrate their participation in and compliance with the provisions of any
such Hometown Plan. Each contractor or subcontractor participating in an
approved plan is individually required to comply with its obligations under the
EEO clause and to make a good faith effort to achieve each goal under the Plan in
each trade in which it has employees. The overall good faith performance by
other contractors or subcontractors toward a goal in an approved Plan does not
excuse any covered contractor's or subcontractor's failure to take good faith
efforts to achieve the Plan goals and timetables.
E. The Contractor shall implement the specific affirmative action standards provided
in paragraphs H1 through H16 of these specifications. The goals set forth in the
solicitation from which this contract resulted are expressed as percentages of the
total hours of employment and training of minority and female utilization the
contractor should reasonably be able to achieve in each construction trade in
which it has employees in the covered area. Covered construction contractors
performing construction work in a geographical area where they do not have a
Federal or federally assisted construction contract shall apply the minority and
female goals established for the geographical area where the work is being
performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice
form, and such notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract
Compliance Programs office or from Federal procurement contracting officers.
The Contractor is expected to make substantially uniform progress in meeting its
goals in each craft during the period specified.
F. Neither the provisions of any collective bargaining agreement nor the failure by a
union with whom the contractor has a collective bargaining agreement to refer
either minorities or women shall excuse the Contractor's obligations under these
specifications, Executive Order 11246 or the regulations promulgated pursuant
thereto.
G. In order for the non-working training hours of apprentices and trainees to be
counted in meeting the goals, such apprentices and trainees shall be employed by
the contractor during the training period and the contractor shall have made a
commitment to employ the apprentices and trainees at the completion of their
training, subject to the availability of employment opportunities. Trainees shall
be trained pursuant to training programs approved by the U.S. Department of
Labor.
H. The Contractor shall take specific affirmative actions to ensure equal employment
opportunity. The evaluation of the Contractor's compliance with these
specifications shall be based upon its effort to achieve maximum results from its
actions. The Contractor shall document these efforts fully and shall implement
affirmative action steps at least as extensive as the following:
1) Ensure and maintain a working environment free of harassment,
intimidation, and coercion at all sites, and in all facilities at which the
contractor's employees are assigned to work. The Contractor, where possible,
will assign two or more women to each construction project. The Contractor
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
24
shall specifically ensure that all foremen, superintendents, and other onsite
supervisory personnel are aware of and carry out the contractor's obligation to
maintain such a working environment, with specific attention to minority or
female individuals working at such sites or in such facilities.
2) Establish and maintain a current list of minority and female recruitment
sources, provide written notification to minority and female recruitment
sources and to community organizations when the contractor or its unions
have employment opportunities available, and maintain a record of the
organizations' responses.
3) Maintain a current file of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of
each minority and female off-the-street applicant and minority or female
referral from a union, a recruitment source, or community organization and of
what action was taken with respect to each such individual. If such individual
was sent to the union hiring hall for referral and was not referred back to the
contractor by the union or, if referred, not employed by the contractor, this
shall be documented in the file with the reason therefore along with whatever
additional actions the contractor may have taken.
4) Provide immediate written notification to the Director when the union or
unions with which the contractor has a collective bargaining agreement has
not referred to the contractor a minority person or female sent by the
contractor, or when the contractor has other information that the union referral
process has impeded the contractor's efforts to meet its obligations.
5) Develop on-the-job training opportunities and/or participate in training
programs for the area which expressly include minorities and women,
including upgrading programs and apprenticeship and trainee programs
relevant to the contractor's employment needs, especially those programs
funded or approved by the Department of Labor. The Contractor shall
provide notice of these programs to the sources compiled under H2 above.
6) Disseminate the contractor's EEO policy by providing notice of the policy
to unions and training programs and requesting their cooperation in assisting
the contractor in meeting its EEO obligations; by including it in any policy
manual and collective bargaining agreement; by publicizing it in the company
newspaper, annual report, etc.; by specific review of the policy with all
management personnel and with all minority and female employees at least
once a year; and by posting the company EEO policy on bulletin boards
accessible to all employees at each location where construction work is
performed.
7) Review, at least annually, the company's EEO policy and affirmative
action obligations under these specifications with all employees having any
responsibility for hiring, assignment, layoff, termination, or other employment
decisions including specific review of these items with onsite supervisory
personnel such a superintendents, general foremen, etc., prior to the initiation
of construction work at any job site. A written record shall be made and
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
25
maintained identifying the time and place of these meetings, persons
attending, subject matter discussed, and disposition of the subject matter.
8) Disseminate the Contractor's EEO policy externally by including it in any
advertising in the news media, specifically including minority and female
news media, and providing written notification to and discussing the
contractor's EEO policy with other contractors and subcontractors with whom
the Contractor does or anticipates doing business.
9) Direct its recruitment efforts, both oral and written, to minority, female,
and community organizations, to schools with minority and female students;
and to minority and female recruitment and training organizations serving the
Contractor's recruitment area and employment needs. Not later than one
month prior to the date for the acceptance of applications for apprenticeship or
other training by any recruitment source, the contractor shall send written
notification to organizations, such as the above, describing the openings,
screening procedures, and tests to be used in the selection process.
10) Encourage present minority and female employees to recruit other
minority persons and women and, where reasonable, provide after school,
summer, and vacation employment to minority and female youth both on the
site and in other areas of a contractor's workforce.
11) Validate all tests and other selection requirements where there is an
obligation to do so under 41 CFR Part 60-3.
12) Conduct, at least annually, an inventory and evaluation at least of all
minority and female personnel, for promotional opportunities and encourage
these employees to seek or to prepare for, through appropriate training, etc.,
such opportunities.
13) Ensure that seniority practices, job classifications, work assignments, and
other personnel practices do not have a discriminatory effect by continually
monitoring all personnel and employment related activities to ensure that the
EEO policy and the contractor's obligations under these specifications are
being carried out.
14) Ensure that all facilities and company activities are non-segregated except
that separate or single user toilet and necessary changing facilities shall be
provided to assure privacy between the sexes.
15) Document and maintain a record of all solicitations of offers for
subcontracts from minority and female construction contractors and suppliers,
including circulation of solicitations to minority and female contractor
associations and other business associations.
16) Conduct a review, at least annually, of all supervisor's adherence to and
performance under the contractor's EEO policies and affirmative action
obligations.
I. Contractors are encouraged to participate in voluntary associations, which assist
in fulfilling one or more of their affirmative action obligations (H1 through H16).
The efforts of a contractor association, joint contractor union, contractor
community, or other similar groups of which the contractor is a member and
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
26
participant, may be asserted as fulfilling any one or more of its obligations under
H1 through H16 of these specifications provided that the Contractor actively
participates in the group, makes every effort to assure that the group has a positive
impact on the employment of minorities and women in the industry, ensures that
the concrete benefits of the program are reflected in the Contractor's minority and
female workforce participation, makes a good faith effort to meet its individual
goals and timetables, and can provide access to documentation which
demonstrates the effectiveness of actions taken on behalf of the Contractor. The
obligation to comply, however, is the contractor's and failure of such a group to
fulfill an obligation shall not be a defense for the Contractor's noncompliance.
J. A single goal for minorities and a separate single goal for women have been
established. The Contractor, however, is required to provide equal employment
opportunity and to take affirmative action for all minority groups, both male and
female, and all women, both minority and non-minority. Consequently, if the
particular group is employed in a substantially disparate manner (for example,
even though the contractor has achieved its goals for women generally,) the
contractor may be in violation of the Executive Order if a specific minority group
of women is underutilized.
K. The Contractor shall not use the goals and timetables or affirmative action
standards to discriminate against any person because of race, color, religion, sex,
or national origin.
L. The Contractor shall not enter into any subcontract with any person or firm
debarred from Government contracts pursuant to Executive Order 11246.
M. The Contractor shall carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of these
specifications and of the Equal Opportunity Clause, including suspension,
termination, and cancellation of existing subcontracts as may be imposed or
ordered pursuant to Executive Order 11246, as amended, and its implementing
regulations, by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. Any
contractor who fails to carry out such sanctions and penalties shall be in violation
of these specifications and Executive Order 11246, as amended.
N. The Contractor, in fulfilling its obligations under these specifications, shall
implement specific affirmative action steps, at least as extensive as those
standards prescribed in paragraph H of these specifications, so as to achieve
maximum results from its efforts to ensure equal employment opportunity. If the
contractor fails to comply with the requirements of the Executive Order, the
implementing regulations, or these specifications, the Director shall proceed in
accordance with 41 CFR 60-4.8.
O. The Contractor shall designate a responsible official to monitor all employment
related activity to ensure that the company EEO policy is being carried out, to
submit reports relating to the provisions hereof as may be required by the
Government, and to keep records. Records shall at least include for each
employee, the name, address, telephone number, construction trade, union
affiliation if any, employee identification number when assigned, social security
number, race, sex, status (e.g., mechanic, apprentice, trainee, helper, or laborer),
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
27
dates of changes in status, hours worked per week in the indicated trade, rate of
pay, and locations at which the work was performed. Records shall be maintained
in an easily understandable and retrievable form; however, to the degree that
existing records satisfy this requirement, contractors shall not be required to
maintain separate records.
P. Nothing herein provided shall be construed as a limitation upon the application of
other laws which establish different standards of compliance or upon the
application of requirements for the hiring of local or other area residents (e.g.,
those under the Public Works Employment Act of 1977 and the Community
Development Block Grant Program).
XLV. Lobbying and Influencing Federal Employees (FAA Provision A17). The Contractor
certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
A. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of
the Contractor, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer
or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the
awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of
any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant,
loan, or cooperative agreement.
B. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid
to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant,
loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit
Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with
its instructions.
C. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in
the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub-
grants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all
sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
XLVI. Rights to Inventions (FAA Provision A21). Contracts or agreements that include the
performance of experimental, developmental, or research work must provide for the
rights of the Federal Government and the County in any resulting invention as
established by 37 CFR part 401, Rights to Inventions Made by Non-profit
Organizations and Small Business Firms under Government Grants, Contracts, and
Cooperative Agreements. This Contract incorporates by reference the patent and
inventions rights as specified in 37 CFR §401.14. Contractor must include this
requirement in all sub-tier contracts involving experimental, developmental or research
work.
XLVII. Veteran’s Preference (FAA Provision A25). In the employment of labor (excluding
executive, administrative, and supervisory positions), the Contractor and all sub-tier
contractors must give preference to covered veterans as defined within Title 49 United
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
28
States Code Section 47112. Covered veterans include Vietnam-era veterans, Persian
Gulf veterans, Afghanistan-Iraq war veterans, disabled veterans, and small business
concerns (as defined by 15 U.S.C. 632) owned and controlled by disabled veterans.
This preference only applies when there are covered veterans readily available and
qualified to perform the work to which the employment relates.
XLVIII. Trade Restriction Certification (FAA Provision A24). The Contractor certifies that
with respect to this Contract, the Contractor:
A. Is not owned or controlled by one or more citizens of a foreign country included in
the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by the Office
of the United States Trade Representative (U.S.T.R.);
B. Has not knowingly entered into any contract or subcontract for this project with a
person that is a citizen or national of a foreign country included on the list of
countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by the U.S.T.R; and
C. Has not entered into any subcontract for any product to be used on the project that
is produced in a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate
against U.S. firms published by the U.S.T.R.
This certification concerns a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United
States of America and the making of a false, fictitious, or fraudulent certification may
render the maker subject to prosecution under Title 18, United States Code, Section
1001.
The Offeror/Contractor must provide immediate written notice to the Owner if the
Offeror/Contractor learns that its certification or that of a subcontractor was erroneous
when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The
Contractor must require subcontractors provide immediate written notice to the
Contractor if at any time it learns that its certification was erroneous by reason of
changed circumstances.
Unless the restrictions of this clause are waived by the Secretary of Transportation in
accordance with 49 CFR 30.17, no contract shall be awarded to an Offeror or
subcontractor:
1) Who is owned or controlled by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign
country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms
published by the U.S.T.R; or
2) Whose subcontractors are owned or controlled by one or more citizens or
nationals of a foreign country on such U.S.T.R. list; or
3) Who incorporates in the public works project any product of a foreign
country on such U.S.T.R. list.
Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a
system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by this
provision. The knowledge and information of a contractor is not required to exceed
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
29
that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business
dealings.
The Contractor agrees that it will incorporate this provision for certification without
modification in all lower tier subcontracts. The Contractor may rely on the certification
of a prospective subcontractor that it is not a firm from a foreign country included on
the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by U.S.T.R, unless
the Contractor has knowledge that the certification is erroneous.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed
when making an award. If it is later determined that the Contractor or subcontractor
knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, the Federal Aviation Administration
may direct through the Owner cancellation of the contract or subcontract for default at
no cost to the Owner or the FAA.
XLIX. Procurement of Recovered Materials (FAA Provision A20). Contractor and
subcontractor agree to comply with Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the regulatory
provisions of 40 CFR Part 247. In the performance of this contract and to the extent
practicable, the Contractor and subcontractors are to use products containing the
highest percentage of recovered materials for items designated by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) under 40 CFR Part 247 whenever:
A. The contract requires procurement of $10,000 or more of a designated item during
the fiscal year; or,
B. The Contractor has procured $10,000 or more of a designated item using Federal
funding during the previous fiscal year.
C. The list of EPA-designated items is available at
www.epa.gov/epawaste/conserve/tools/cpg/products/.
D. Section 6002(c) establishes exceptions to the preference for recovery of EPA-
designated products if the contractor can demonstrate the item is:
1) Not reasonably available within a timeframe providing for compliance
with the contract performance schedule;
2) Fails to meet reasonable contract performance requirements; or
3) Is only available at an unreasonable price.
L. Seismic Safety (FAA Provision A22).
A. In the performance of design services, the Consultant agrees to furnish a building
design and associated construction specification that conform to a building code
standard which provides a level of seismic safety substantially equivalent to
standards as established by the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
30
(NEHRP). Local building codes that model their building code after the current
version of the International Building Code (IBC) meet the NEHRP equivalency
level for seismic safety. At the conclusion of the design services, the Consultant
agrees to furnish the Owner a “certification of compliance” that attests conformance
of the building design and the construction specifications with the seismic standards
of NEHRP or an equivalent building code.
B. The Contractor agrees to ensure that all work performed under the contract,
including work performed by subcontractors, conforms to a building code standard
that provides a level of seismic safety substantially equivalent to standards
established by the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP).
Local building codes that model their code after the current version of the
International Building Code (IBC) meet the NEHRP equivalency level for seismic
safety.
LI. Distracted Driving (FAA Provision A13). In accordance with Executive Order 13513,
"Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving" (10/1/2009) and
DOT Order 3902.10 “Text Messaging While Driving” (12/30/2009), the FAA
encourages recipients of Federal grant funds to adopt and enforce safety policies that
decrease crashes by distracted drivers, including policies to ban text messaging while
driving when performing work related to a grant or sub-grant.
In support of this initiative, the County encourages the Contractor to promote policies
and initiatives for its employees and other work personnel that decrease crashes by
distracted drivers, including policies that ban text messaging while driving motor
vehicles while performing work activities associated with the project. The Contractor
must include the substance of this clause in all sub-tier contracts exceeding $3,500
which involve driving a motor vehicle in performance of work activities associated
with the project.
Contract # 003.22
Budget Coding: Assigned per Task Order Revision: 2022.14.03 CDD
31
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first set out
herein above.
JACOBSEN | DANIELS, LLC
________________________________________________
!#VENDOR SIGNATURE#! Date
ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT
________________________________________________
!#VENDOR SIGNATURE#! Date
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
MANAGER APPROVAL:
________________________________________________
!#COUNTY MANAGER#! Date
ATTORNEY APPROVAL:
________________________________________________
!#COUNTY ATTORNEY#! Date
Apr-04-2022
Airport Director
Dan Bartholomew
Brad Jacobsen
Apr-06-2022
Executive Vice President
Richard Neiley
Apr-11-2022
Asst. County Attorney
Rich Englehart
Deputy County Manager
Apr-11-2022
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
1
PUBLIC NOTICE
Pitkin County is accepting qualifications for the provision of an Updated Airport Layout Plan
and Narrative Report for the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport.
More information is available online at www.BidNetDirect.com/Colorado.
Any and all questions, or requests for clarification, must be submitted by 2:00 PM MT on
November 12, 2021. Questions and requests for clarification will only be accepted via email
at procurement@pitkincounty.com.
Proposal documents must be uploaded to the BidNet Direct website no later than 2:00 PM
MT on November 30, 2021.
Published in the Aspen Daily News: October 18, 2021 and October 25, 2021
TITLE VI SOLICITATION NOTICE
Pitkin County, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d.4) and the applicable regulations, hereby notifies
all submitters that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this
Public Notice, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to
submit qualifications in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the
grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.
The requirements of 49 CFR part 26 will apply to any contract or services agreement
awarded as a direct or indirect result of this RFQ process. It is the policy of Pitkin County
to practice nondiscrimination based on race, color, sex or national origin in the award or
performance of this contract. The County encourages participation by all firms qualifying
under this solicitation regardless of business size or ownership.
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
2
AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN UPDATE SERVICES FOR THE ASPEN/PITKIN
COUNTY AIRPORT
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION 3
II. SCOPE OF WORK 3
A. QUALIFICATIONS FORM 3
B. SCOPE OF SERVICES 3
III. SELECTION PROCESS 4
A. SUBMITTALS 5
B. TIME SCHEDULE 6
C. EVALUATION CRITERIA 6
D. SELECTION COMMITTEE 6
E. DBE PARTICIPATION 7
F. MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 8
QUALIFICATIONS FORM 9
INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS 12
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
3
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
Airport Layout Plan Update for Aspen/Pitkin County Airport (ASE)
GENERAL INFORMATION TO PROPOSERS
I. INTRODUCTION
This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is being issued to solicit statements of
qualifications form experienced professional consulting firms (individuals,
partnerships, companies and corporations), interested in updating the Airport Layout
Plan (ALP), including the development of a robust narrative report, for the
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport (Airport). Pitkin County, which owns and operates the
Airport, will accept and review Statements of Qualifications from firms and select
the most suitable and beneficial firm(s) to provide services to the Airport. Those
firms considered most qualified by the Airport may be requested to make further
submittals and/or to be interviewed prior to the Airport making its final selection(s).
The deadline for submitting Statements of Qualifications is 2:00 PM, MT November
30, 2021, via the BidNet Direct website.
Pitkin County anticipates funding for the contract resulting from this RFQ all or in
part through Federal grant funds issued by the Federal Aviation Administrations
(FAA). The project should be conducted in accordance with applicable FAA Advisory
Circulars and other federal, state, and local requirements including but not limited to
AC 150/5070-6B (Airport Master Plans), AC 150/5300-13 (Airport Design), AC
150/5050-4A (Community Involvement in Airport Planning), AC 150/5300-16
(Aeronautical Surveying), AC 150/5300-17 (Airport Imagery), and AC 150/5300-18
(Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards).
II. SCOPE OF WORK
A. QUALIFICATIONS FORM
Proposers will be required to submit a qualifications evidencing the ability to deliver
the anticipated Scope of Services. Only proposals with a complete proposal
Qualifications Form will be considered.
B. SCOPE OF SERVICES
This selection is for Airport Layout Plan and Narrative Report services. The selected
firm must be qualified to provide the following services over the length of the
contract (Estimated project completion time: 12-18 months from NTP). The
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
4
following task are expected to be part of this project, but are not to be considered
exhaustive. Additional tasks may be issued on a task-order basis:
Review and analysis of existing airport layout plan documents
Acquisition of aerial ortho-photography
Prepare Planimetics in FAA AGIS format
Perform Obstruction Survey
Analyze and incorporate Common Ground Recommendations from the
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Community Vision process
Prepare Updates Airport Layout Plan (All pages)
Evaluate existing Environmental Assessment for project implementation
Prepare a phased capital project implementation plan and roadmap
Update the airport’s aircraft operational and passenger forecasts
Prepare and delivery occasional public and Board presentations
Work closely with Airport and County staff during the project
Deliverables to include:
o Airport Layout Plan Set including (Hardcopy and PDF formats):
Cover Sheet
Existing Conditions Sheet
Future Conditions Sheet
Ultimate Conditions Sheet
Airport Data Sheet
Terminal Layout (Existing, Future, and Ultimate) Sheet
Existing and Future Airport Airspace Plan, Profile, and
Obstruction Tables Sheets
Existing and Future Inner Approach Surface Plan, Profile, and
Obstruction Table Sheets
Existing and Future Departure Surface Plan, Profile, and
Obstruction Table Sheets
Airport Land Use (Existing, Future, and Ultimate) Sheet
Exhibit A Airport Property Map Sheet
o Electronic AGIS files
o AutoCAD Files
o Color Ortho-Photography (6” or better resolution)
o Narrative Report
o Aviation Forecast (Operational and Passenger)
o Phased Capital Project Implementation Plan
o Submission to FAA and subsequent FAA Approval
III. SELECTION PROCESS
The County is required by the terms of the Pitkin County Procurement Code to
conduct a competitive selection process to select a Contractor for the above-described
RFQ. This process shall be through formal qualifications submitted in response to
this Request for Qualification.
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
5
Given that the funding for the contract resulting from this RFQ is anticipated in whole
or in part through a federal grant issued by the FAA, the selection of the services shall
follow the FAA’s Advisory Circular 150/5100‐14E (Change 1 consolidated):
https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/150-5100-14E-
consolidated.pdf
A. SUBMITTALS
1. Proposer shall submit their qualifications as outlined in the Request for
Qualifications and Scope of Services.
Response Format: Each response shall be 8½” X 11” in size. Font, Times New
Roman, size shall be no smaller than 12 point and submission shall not exceed twenty
(20) pages total, any page after page 20 will not be reviewed. Exclusions for cover
letters, Qualifications Form, personnel résumés, and Template Contract revisions, all
to be uploaded as their own separate file.
a. The proposal must contain name, address, daytime phone number(s), and
e-mail address for person(s) to whom additional selection process requests
should be communicated;
b. A proposed approach and basic description of how the Proposer will
proceed with the services;
c. A statement of Qualifications of the Proposer;
d. Qualifications of the staff to be dedicated to the project;
e. A completed Qualifications Form;
f. List of all subcontractors;
2. Proposer may be required to supply additional information upon request, or to
make additional submissions under secondary selection criteria, if necessary.
3. Any and all questions or comments shall be submitted via email to
procurement@pitkincounty.com no later than 5:00 PM MT on November 12, 2021.
All requests must have the email subject line, “RFQ 164.21: Request for Clarification
and Questions.” All questions, comments and answers provided shall be shared with
all Proposers via addendum posted on BidNet Direct.
4. All Qualifications must be uploaded to the BidNet Direct website.
Qualifications will not be accepted in any other form or manner.
5. During the Request for Qualifications selection process, all responses shall
remain confidential. The entire selection process (procurement) file shall be available
to the public (which includes all Proposers) after an agreement is approved by the
County, except those items for which confidentiality has been requested in writing by
the Proposer, and providing that the County Attorney has reviewed and determined
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
6
said item(s) to be the properly classified as confidential under the State Open Records
Act and other relevant statutes and regulations.
B. TIME SCHEDULE
The County will endeavor to use the following timetable:
RFQ Process:
October 12, 2021 Request for Qualifications publicly advertised, posted on
website and/or direct solicitations mailed.
November 12, 2021 Proposer’s request for clarification and questions due via
email to procurement@pitkincounty.com by 4:00 PM MT
November 19, 2021 County’s response to request for clarification and questions
posted on BidNet Direct via addendum
November 30, 2021 PROPOSALS MUST BE UPLOADED TO BIDNET
DIRECT BY 2:00 PM MT
Week of Dec 20th Meeting of Selection Committee; checking of references;
selection of proposers to interview if necessary
Tentative Milestones:
Early January, 2022 Interview/s with short-listed Proposer/s if necessary
Q1, 2022 Master Services Agreement and Task Order 1 negotiations.
C. EVALUATION CRITERIA
Selection of the "short-listed" Proposers to be interviewed and/or the selection of the
top- ranked Proposer will be based upon the following criteria (or as the same may be
amended or supplemented by published secondary selection criteria, if any):
1. Submitted Statement of Qualifications meets this RFQ requirements
(0-5 points)
2. Relevant firm experience (0-25 points)
3. Qualifications and experience of proposed staff (0-30 points)
4. Understanding of Project Scope and familiarity with the Aspen/Pitkin
County Airport (0-25 points)
5. Displayed ability to comply with DBE requirements (0-5 points)
6. Demonstrated ability of proposer to meet schedules and budgets with
similar airport project (0-5 points)
7. Availability of staff and proximity of office(s) to Project Area (0-5
points)
D. SELECTION COMMITTEE
Communications between Proposer and any member of the selection committee
during the selection process except when and in the manner expressly authorized by
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
7
the Request for Qualifications, is prohibited. Violation of this restriction is grounds
for disqualification from the process.
Voting Members of the
Selection Committee:
Nonvoting counsel to the
Selection Committee:
-Dan Bartholomew, ASE
-Matt Whitelock, ASE
-Perrin Taylor, ASE
-G.R. Fielding, Engineering
-County Attorney
-County Procurement
E. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PARTICIPATION
Since this contract will be funded in whole or in part using FAA funds, it is the policy
of Pitkin County to ensure that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs), as
defined in 49 CFR Part 26, can compete fairly for opportunities to participate as
subcontractors and suppliers on all contracts awarded by the County to ensure a level
playing field.
The County has not established a firm DBE participation percentage requirement as
of the issuance of this RFQ for the anticipated project period. The requirement will be
communicated as quickly as possible following adoption. Previous projects of similar
scope have included a DBE commitment of 2.6% for reference only.
The Proposer must include information about each subcontractor that would or may
be utilized under an awarded contract.
The Proposer shall include its DBE commitment for the contract that results from this
RFQ.
The Proposer will provide evidence that it will meet the DBE goal as defined in the
Federal Regulations through the submission of a DBE participation plan describing in
detail the work and responsibilities that the DBE(s) will perform.
The Proposer can meet the DBE requirements set forth herein in either of two ways:
1. The Proposer can meet the goal by documenting commitments for
participation by DBE firms sufficient for this purpose.
2. If the DBE participation plan proposed does not fully meet the intended goal,
the Proposer must document adequate good faith efforts in order to be considered
further.
The firms utilized by the Proposer under its plan must be validated by the County as
a certified DBE in accordance with 49 CFR Part 26. Each proposal will be reviewed
by the County for responsiveness to the criteria. Additionally, in accordance with 49
CFR 26.55, only DBE participation that results from a commercially useful function
may be counted toward the DBE participation commitment. A DBE performs a
commercially useful function when it is responsible for execution of the work of the
contract and is carrying out its responsibilities by actually performing, managing, and
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
8
supervising the work involved. A DBE does not perform a commercially useful
function if its role is limited to that of an extra participant in a transaction, contract,
or project through which funds are passed in order to obtain the appearance of DBE
participation.
F. MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT
Upon selection of a top-ranked Proposer, negotiations will commence immediately
for a Master Services Agreement with terms to be consistent with this Request for
Qualifications. The development of the first Task Order will also start at the same
time. It is anticipated that the scope of Task Order 1 will be a review and evaluation
of existing ASE ALP data, documentation and information. This information will be
provided to the selected consultant. A copy of the County’s Standard Master
Services Agreement (MSA) is attached for reference. Proposers must submit any
exceptions to this agreement with their Proposal. No other changes to the MSA will
be considered. A copy of the Standard MSA is included in the Proposal Packed for
reference.
Federal Regulations. Contractor, as it relates to the services that will be required upon
award of a contract, represents and acknowledges to the County that it and its
subcontractors are knowledgeable as to any and all codes, rules and regulations
applicable in the jurisdictions in which the services will be performed and the funding
sources for the services, including without limitation, County and local ordinances
and codes, Colorado laws, rules, regulations and grant requirements, and Federal laws,
rules, regulations, advisory circulars and grant requirements, including without
limitation, PFC requirements, requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act,
and requirements of the FAA, and the Federal Transportation Security Administration
("TSA") and the Colorado Department of Transportation ("CDOT"). In the
performance of services, the contractor and its subcontractors shall comply with all
such laws, codes, rules, regulations, advisory circulars and requirements now in effect
and as may be amended or adopted at any time during the term of the contract, and
shall further take into account in the performance of its services hereunder, all known
or publicly announced pending changes to the foregoing. The contractor and its
subcontractors shall provide any and all certifications to the County as to compliance
with such laws, codes, rules, regulations, advisory circulars and requirements, as may
be required by any governmental body, including FAA, TSA, CDOT and County
departments. The contractor shall insert all required FAA provisions in its
subcontractor agreements.
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
9
QUALIFICATIONS FORM
From:
Phone
E-mail Address:
To: Airport Layout Plan Update for the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
0233 E Airport Road
Aspen, CO 81611
Proposal Time: 2:00 PM MT
Proposal Date: November 30, 2021
Pursuant to a request by the Pitkin County Commissioners, the undersigned Proposer having
examined this Request for Qualifications (RFQ), including the site of the proposed Service
and being familiar with conditions surrounding the Service of the proposed Service, including
the availability of materials and labor hereby proposed to furnish all labor, materials, supplies,
applicable permits, services and supervision required to perform the Service as detailed in
this RFQ.
Description:
Statement and Approach to Service:
Qualifications of Proposer:
Please insert names address, phone numbers and description of similar Service for Reference
Checks.
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
10
1.
2.
3.
QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL
Please list assigned personnel and their qualifications:
Personnel #1.________________________________________________
Qualifications:
List of similar Service performed:
Reference Name, & Phone Number:
Personnel #2.________________________________________________
Qualifications:
List of similar Service performed:
Reference Name, & Phone Number:
Personnel #3.________________________________________________
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
11
Qualifications:
List of similar Service performed:
Reference Name, & Phone Number:
It is further understood that the right is reserved by the County to reject any and all Statements
of Qualifications.
The Proposer acknowledges receipt of Addenda Nos. .
The right is reserved to waive any informalities and to reject any Statement of
Qualifications.
Dated this day of , 2021
(Corporate seal) PROPOSER:
SIGNATURES: If the proposal is being submitted by a Corporation, the Proposer
should be signed by an officer, i.e. President or vice-president. The signature of the officer
signing shall be attested to by the secretary and properly sealed. If the proposal is being
submitted by an individual or a partnership, the proposal shall so indicate and be properly
signed.
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
12
INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
FOR PITKIN COUNTY CONTRACTS
1.
a. A "Qualification" is a responsive, conforming, unconditional, complete, legible
and properly executed offer on the Pitkin County Qualifications Form to do the
work called for in the Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”).
b. Qualifications must be submitted electronically in PDF format and submitted
at the time and place designated in the RFQ. Electronic submissions must be
clearly marked as a "sealed Qualification" with the project name and the name,
contact person, mailing address and telephone number of the Proposer. For
electronic submissions, the County reserves the right to request verification of
any original or electronic signature at any time before issuing a Notice of
Award.
c. It shall be the responsibility of the Proposer to ensure that the Qualification is
in proper form and in the County's possession by or before the scheduled time
and date of public Qualification opening. Qualifications will not be accepted
after the scheduled time and date of opening. Any Qualifications received late
will be returned to the Proposer unopened, if possible. In the event that it is
impossible to determine who the late Proposer is unless the envelope is opened,
the envelope will be opened, the address determined, and the envelope and
Qualification returned immediately to the Proposer.
d. If specified in the Request for Qualifications, parties who request packages of
Qualification documents will be required to pay a fee for the document
package. All parties who request packages must provide the name of the
potential Proposer, along with the name of a contact person, address, telephone
number, fax number and email address for the purpose of dissemination of
Addenda or additional Qualification information.
e. If a mistake is made or discovered at or after the public opening, the County
reserves the right to determine which party made the mistake and whether the
mistake is material and, after these determinations, the County, in its sole
discretion, shall make the decision whether to accept or reject the Qualification.
No advantage shall be taken by either party of manifest clerical errors or
omissions in the Qualification documents or the Request for Qualifications
(and plans and specifications). All Proposers are required to notify the County
immediately of any errors of omissions that may be encountered. (See 2.a. and
2.c., below).
f. The signer of the Qualification must initial any alteration or erasure. If provided
on the required Qualification Form, the Qualification price of each item must
be stated in numerals and words; in case of a conflict, the words will control.
In case of conflict between the indicated sum of any addition of figures and the
correct sum, the correct sum will control.
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
13
g. No reimbursement will be made by the County for any costs incurred in the
preparation of a statement of qualifications, Qualifications, or attendance at a
site inspection, pre-bid conference or interviews.
h. No person, firm, corporation or other entity shall be allowed to make, file or be
interested in more than one Qualification for the same work, unless alternate
Qualifications are called for. A person, firm, corporation or other entity who
has submitted a sub-Qualification to Proposer, or who has quoted prices on
materials to a Proposer, is not hereby disqualified from submitting a sub-
qualification or quoting prices to other Proposers.
2.
a. If any person contemplating submitting a Qualification is in doubt as to the true
meaning of any part of the Drawings, Specifications or other Qualification or
Contract Documents, or finds discrepancies, errors, ambiguities,
inconsistencies, incompleteness or omissions in the Drawings or Specifications
or the Qualification process, he/she must submit to the Procurement Officer a
written request for an amplification, clarification, explanation, interpretation or
correction thereof. Failure to do so shall constitute: (1) acceptance by the
Proposer of the Drawings, Specifications or other Qualification or Contract
Documents as is, and (2) a waiver by the Proposer of any and all claims arising,
or that might arise, out of such discrepancies, errors, ambiguities,
inconsistencies, incompleteness or omissions.
b. Proposers may propose substitute materials or techniques if such substitution
is equal to or better than the materials or techniques described in the RFQ and
if the substitution has been submitted in writing at least ten (10) days prior to
the public Qualification opening. The burden of proof of equality or superior
quality is on the Proposer. If accepted as equal by the County in its discretion,
the substitute will be designated as an alternative on a formal addendum
distributed to all Proposers at least three (3) days prior to the deadline for
Qualification submission.
c. Any amplification, clarification, explanation, interpretation or correction of the
documents will be made only by written Addendum duly issued and a copy of
the Addendum will be mailed or delivered to each person receiving a set of the
Qualification Documents. Delivery, as used in these Instructions, shall include
electronic delivery through e-mail, facsimile, web-posting or other electronic
means. Neither the County nor the Procurement Officer will be responsible for
any information, representations, explanations or interpretations of the
Contract Documents not in written addenda.
d. The County reserves the right to call a pre-Qualification conference; if called
and conducted, a summary of the pre-Qualification conference will be mailed
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
14
or electronically delivered to all parties receiving a set of Qualification
documents.
e. On request, the County will provide each Proposer access to the site to conduct,
at Proposer's sole cost, such inspections, tests and investigations as each
Proposer deems necessary for submission of a Qualification. No information
provided by County representatives at such a site inspection shall be deemed a
waiver of the requirements of 2.a. and 2.c., above.
f. Any Addenda issued during the time of the Qualification process, or forming a
part of the Qualification Documents, shall be covered in the Qualification, and
shall be considered a part of the RFQ. Receipt of each Addendum shall be
acknowledged in the Qualification.
g. If specified in the RFQ, a request for qualifications may precede the RFQ
process.
3.
a. Each Qualification, if required by the Qualification Documents, shall be
accompanied by a certified check or bid bond in a form acceptable to the
County Attorney, in an amount specified, payable without condition to the
County as a guarantee that the Proposer, if awarded the Contract, will promptly
execute the Agreement in accordance with the Qualification, and will furnish,
if required by the Qualification, good and sufficient bonds for the faithful
performance of the Contract and for the payment to all persons supplying labor
and material for the work (see 10.a., below). The Qualification guaranties of all
parties except the three highest scoring Qualifications will be returned
promptly after the opening of Qualifications. After execution of the Contract
and issuance of a Notice to Proceed, the remaining two Proposers’ guaranties
will be returned.
b. Proposer also, if required by the Qualification Documents, will fully complete
and submit with the Qualification a Pitkin County Qualification Statement, or
an updated Statement if one is already on file. Pitkin County reserves the right
to pre-qualify Proposers based on said qualification statements.
c. Proposer also must submit with the Qualification a list of subcontractors,
independent contractors and suppliers to be employed under the Contract. If
the County has a reasonable objection to any such subcontractor, independent
contractor or supplier, it shall notify the Proposer and the Proposer may then:
(a) withdraw the Qualification; or (b) substitute an acceptable contractor or
supplier. If required by the Contract Documents, subcontractors, independent
contractors and/or suppliers may be required to submit a Contractor's
Qualification Statement.
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
15
d. Qualifications by corporations must be executed in the corporate name by the
president or a vice-president (or other corporate officer accompanied by
evidence of authority to sign) and the corporate seal must be affixed and
attested by the secretary or an assistant secretary. The corporate address and
state of incorporation shall be shown below the signature.
e. Qualifications by partnerships or limited liability companies (“LLC”) must be
executed in the partnership or LLC name and signed by a partner, authorized
LLC officer, whose title must appear under the signature and the official
address of the partnership or LLC must be shown below the signature. The state
in which the entity was formed and whose law governs the entity shall be
shown below the signature.
f. All names must be typed or printed below the signature.
4.
a. Proposer acknowledges that this Qualification is solicited and submitted
subject to the requirements of the "Pitkin County Procurement Code,"
(Ordinance #026-2005, as amended by Ordinance #03-2007 (copies available
on the Pitkin County website at
http://pitkincounty.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/5314 or upon request
for a nominal charge). As such, the Proposer agrees to comply with all
applicable requirements of said Procurement Code relating to proposing,
contract drafting, contract administration and ethics. The requirements of the
Procurement Code are incorporated herein by this reference.
b. The Proposer shall immediately notify the County Manager in writing of any
violation of said Code by the County's employees or agents, which violation is
known or should have been known by Proposer, and failure to so notify the
County of violations within five (5) days of knowledge of such violations shall
disqualify the Proposer from award of the Contract being proposed and shall
be deemed as a waiver of any action or defense that the Proposer may have
against the County by reason of such violation of the Procurement Code.
c. The submission of a Qualification shall be conclusive evidence and legal
admission that the Proposer: (1) has no questions, complaints or objections in
connection with the Qualification process and/or documents, subject to any
requests made by Proposer for amplification, clarification, explanation,
interpretation or correction pursuant to Paragraph 2.a. and 2.c., above; (2) has
no questions, complaints or objections as to the completeness, sufficiency,
scope or detail of the Qualification Documents; and (3) has full knowledge of
the scope, nature, quality and quantity of work to be performed, the detailed
requirements of the Qualification Documents including any and all contract
documents, the plans and specifications, the site and conditions under which
the work is to be performed, the Pitkin County Procurement Code and
applicable Colorado law.
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
16
5.
a. All Qualifications will be opened and read in public by name of Proposer only.
No Qualifications may be withdrawn after the beginning of the public opening.
The County, in its sole discretion, may delay a Qualification opening for no
longer than two (2) business days if weather or other circumstances beyond
control of Proposers results in delay in receipt of Qualifications. Qualifications
may be withdrawn at any time prior to the beginning of the public opening or
modified by a document executed and delivered in a form substantially similar
to the Qualification Form prior to opening.
b. All Qualifications submitted must be valid for a minimum period of sixty (60)
days after the date of the Qualification opening. During this time, Proposers are
investigated, and Qualifications are evaluated.
6.
a. Qualifications will be awarded to the highest scoring Proposer complying with
the terms, conditions, guidelines, selection criteria, plans and specifications
presented in the Request for Qualifications. All rights are reserved by the
County to determine, in the County's sole reasonable discretion, whether the
Qualification meets the needs or a purpose intended and is within the project
budget.
b. The County will consider the quality of Proposers services and products as
judged by the County; past experience with Proposers, subcontractors,
independent contractors, products or suppliers; qualifications of the Proposers
and/or subcontractors, independent contractors or suppliers; services offered;
warranties; maintenance considerations; long-range costs; delivery; and similar
considerations, all as specified in detail in the RFQ.
c. The County reserves the absolute right to conduct such investigations as it
deems necessary to assist in the evaluation of any Qualification and to establish
the experience, responsibility, reliability, references, reputation, business
ethics, history, qualifications and financial ability of the Proposers and
proposed subcontractors, independent contractors and suppliers. The purpose
of such investigation is to satisfy the County that the Proposer has the
experience, resources and commercial reputation necessary to perform the
work and support any warranties in accordance with the Contract Documents
in the prescribed manner and time.
d. The County, at its sole discretion, may require the apparent successful Proposer
to demonstrate, at a place and time designated by the County, that the
Qualification meets the performance criteria specified, or to otherwise provide
documented proof from independent reliable sources acceptable to the County
that said performance criteria will be met prior to final acceptance of the
Qualification. The burden of proof of such a demonstration is on the Proposer.
RFQ #: 003.22
Budget Line Item #: FAA & Airport General Funding
17
In the event that the apparent successful Proposer fails to demonstrate or
provide acceptable proof of meeting required performance criteria, that
Qualification will be rejected and the next eligible Proposer in the selection
ranking will be invited to participate in the same process until a Qualification
meeting performance criteria is found within the ranking of eligible Proposers.
The County reserves the rights to reject any or all Qualifications or to otherwise
accept the Qualification which in the County's sole discretion is in the best
interest of the County.
e. Pitkin County reserves the right, if it deems such action to be in the best
interests of the County, to reject any and all Qualifications or to waive any
irregularities or informalities therein. Any incomplete, conclusory, false or
misleading information provided by Proposer shall be grounds for rejection of
the Qualification. If Qualifications are rejected, the County further reserves the
right to investigate and accept the next best Qualification in order of ranking or
to reject all Qualifications and re-solicit for additional Qualifications.
f. Any questions or disputes involving the documents or procedures not covered
by these Instructions or other Qualification Documents shall be resolved by the
Procurement Officer on the basis of fairness, custom in the industry,
maximization of competition and best interests and convenience of the County.
7. Issuance of Notice of Award, execution of Contract Documents and issuance of a
Notice to Proceed shall be as specified in the Contract Documents.
8. Contracts will be executed on standard Pitkin County Contract documents and/or by
separate agreement with the Proposer. Copies of any applicable standard forms are
included with the Qualification Documents. The County reserves the right to negotiate
with the Proposer for contract terms not specified in the Proposing Documents. Any
changes from the Pitkin County standard form contract may result in a delay in the
issuance of a Notice to Proceed in order to obtain any necessary County Attorney
review of changes from the standard form. Proposer agrees that any such delays shall
not be grounds for either additional compensation or an extension of time to complete
the work that is the subject of the Qualification.
9. If the contract awarded as a result of a Qualification extends beyond the calendar year,
nothing herein shall be construed as an obligation by the County beyond any amounts
that may be, from time to time, appropriated by the County on an annual basis. It is
understood that payment under any Contract is conditional upon annual or
supplemental statutory appropriation of funds by said governing body and that before
providing services, the Proposer, if he/she so requests, will be advised as to the status
of funds appropriated for services or materials and shall not be obligated to provide
services or materials for which funds have not been appropriated.
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
1
MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR PROVISION OF
AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN UPDATE AND NARRATIVE REPORT FOR THE
ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT
THIS MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), is made and entered by and
between the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, 530 E. Main St., Suite
#302, Aspen, CO 81611, (“County”) and Contractor Legal Entity, Contractor Street Address
(Include Suite/Unit), City, ST ZIP (hereinafter called the “Contractor”).
I. Term of Contract: The term of this contract is from Contract Start Date to Contract End
Date. Optional Contract Extension
II. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor shall provide Enter Description of Services
services for various County projects as set forth herein and as set forth in the individual
Task Orders, which Task Orders shall be made a part of this contract upon execution
by the County and the Contractor. Contractor shall complete the scope of work as
defined in the individual Task Orders issued by the County, from time to time, and
agreed upon by Contractor. The projects defined in the individual Task Orders shall be
the County’s engineering requirements for work with an estimated value of under spell
out number of dollars dollars and spell out number of cents cents ($0.00). All projects
that are estimated to be over spell out number of dollars dollars and spell out number
of cents cents ($0.00) shall be subject to formal Request for Proposal/Quotation.
The scope of services shall include, but is not limited to the following:
If required, the Contractor shall utilize the following subcontractors to complete the
work defined in the Task Orders. Additional subcontractors may be added by written
agreement from both parties:
III. Compensation and Expenses, Invoicing, Payment and Offset. The County shall
compensate Contractor for its services in accordance with the Project Budgets and
Schedules set out in the Task Orders. It is expressly understood and agreed that in no
event will the total compensation and reimbursement to be paid hereunder exceed the
sum defined in the Task Orders. By Task Order or Task Order Amendment, the County
and Contractor may reallocate the budget among project tasks if the total budget
amount remains unchanged. Contractor shall invoice for the project monthly based on
hours worked, with payment expected within thirty (30) days of invoice, but any
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
2
payment by the County may be offset by any amount the Contractor owes the County
for any reason.
IV. County’s Exclusive Ownership of Work Product. Drawings, specifications, guidelines
and other documents prepared by Contractor in connection with this Agreement shall
be the property of the County. However, Contractor shall have the right to utilize such
documents in the course of its marketing, professional presentations, and for other
business purposes. Contractor assigns to County the copyrights to all work prepared,
developed, or created pursuant to this Agreement, including the right to: 1) reproduce
the work; 2) prepare derivative works; 3) distribute copies to the public; 4) perform the
works publicly; and 5) to display the work publicly. Contractor shall have right to use
materials produced in the course of this Agreement for marketing purposes and
professional presentations, articles, speeches and other business purposes.
V. Pitkin County’s Obligations. Pitkin County shall administer this Agreement
through a County Representative identified in the individual Task Orders. The services
provided and products delivered by the Contractor under this Agreement will be subject
to review by the County’s Representatives, or a designee, for compliance with
Contractor’s obligations prior to final payment.
VI. Termination Prior to Expiration of Contract Term. The County has the right to
terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the
Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. Such notice
shall be given at least ten (10) days before the effective date of such termination. In
such event all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies and reports prepared by
the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall become the County’s property.
Contractor shall be entitled to receive compensation in accordance with the Agreement
for any satisfactory work completed pursuant to the terms of this Contract prior to the
date of termination. Notwithstanding the above, Contractor shall not be relieved of
liability to the County for damages sustained by the County by virtue of any breach of
the contract by the Contractor.
VII. Independent Contractor Status.
A. The parties to this Agreement intend that the relationship between them
contemplated by the Agreement is that of independent contractor. Contractor, and
any agent, employee, or servant of Contractor shall not be deemed to be an
employee, agent, or servant of Pitkin County.
B. Contractor is not required to offer his services exclusively to Pitkin County under
this Agreement. Contractor may choose to work for other individuals or entities
during the term of this contract, provided that the basic services and deliverable
products required under this Agreement are submitted in the manner and on the
schedule defined under this Agreement.
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
3
C. Contractor warrants that all work produced will conform to all applicable industry
standard of care, skill and diligence in the performance of Contractor’s obligations
under this Agreement.
D. Contractor shall not attempt to oversee or supervise the work or actions of any
Pitkin County employee, servant or agent in the course of completing work under
this Agreement.
E. Contractor is not entitled to any Workers’ Compensation benefits through Pitkin
County and is responsible for payment of any federal, state, FICA and other income
taxes.
VIII. Assignability. This Agreement is not assignable by either party. Any use of
subcontractors by the Contractor for performance of this Agreement must be accepted
in writing by the County.
IX. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be
invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain valid
and binding upon the parties hereto.
X. Integration and Modification.
A. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the
County and the Contractor and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or
Agreement, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written
Agreement signed by both the County and the Contractor.
B. The County may, from time to time, request changes in the scope of services of the
Contractor to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including the increase or
decrease in the amount of the Contractor’s compensation, which are mutually
agreed upon between the County and the Contractor, shall be in writing and upon
execution shall become part of this Agreement.
XI. Indemnity.
A. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and, not excluding the County's
right to participate, defend the County, its subsidiary, parent, associated and/or
affiliated entities, successors, or assigns, its elected officials, trustees, employees,
agents, volunteers, and any jurisdiction or agency issuing permits for any work
included in the project,, hereinafter referred to as indemnitee, from all suits and
claims, including attorney's fees and cost of litigation, actions, loss, damage,
expense, cost or claims of any character or any nature arising out of the work done
in fulfillment of the terms of this Agreement or on account of any act, claim or
amount arising or recovered under workers' compensation law or arising out of the
failure of the Contractor to conform to any statutes, ordinances, regulation, law or
court decree. It is agreed that the Contractor will be responsible for primary loss
investigation, defense and judgment costs where this Agreement of indemnity
applies. In consideration of the award of this Agreement, the Contractor agrees to
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
4
waive all rights of subrogation against the County its subsidiary, parent, associated
and/or affiliated entities, successors, or assigns, its elected officials, trustees,
employees, agents, and volunteers for losses arising from the work performed by
the Contractor for the County.
B. The Contractor further shall investigate, process, respond to, adjust, provide
defense for and defend, pay or settle all claims, demands, or lawsuits related hereto
at its sole expense and shall bear all other costs and expenses related thereto, even
if the claim, demand or lawsuit is groundless, false or fraudulent.
XII. Insurance. Contractor and subcontractors shall procure and maintain until all of their
obligations have been discharged, including any warranty periods under this
Agreement are satisfied, insurance against claims for injury to persons or damage to
property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work
hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
The insurance requirements herein are minimum requirements for this Agreement and
in no way limit the indemnity covenants contained in this Agreement.
The County in no way warrants that the minimum limits contained herein are sufficient
to protect the Contractor from liabilities that might arise out of the performance of the
work under this Agreement by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees,
or subcontractors. The Contractor shall assess its own risks and if it deems appropriate
and/or prudent, maintain higher limits and/or broader coverages. The Contractor is not
relieved of any liability or other obligations assumed or pursuant to the Agreement by
reason of its failure to obtain or maintain insurance in sufficient amounts, duration, or
types.
A. Coverage and Limits of Insurance. Coverage and Limits of Insurance.
Contractor shall provide coverage with limits of liability not less than those stated
below. An umbrella and/or excess liability policy may be used to meet the
minimum liability requirements provided that the coverage is written on a
“following form” basis.
1) Statutory Workers’ Compensation: Colorado statutory minimums
a. Policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation against the County.
b. This requirement shall not apply when a contractor or subcontractor
is exempt under Colorado Workers’ Compensation Act AND when
such contractor or subcontractor executes the appropriate sole
proprietor waiver form.
Minimum Limits:
Coverage A (Workers’ Compensation) Statutory
Coverage B (Employers Liability)
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
5
2) Commercial General Liability – ISO 1CG 0001 form or equivalent.
(With County named as an additional insured)
Minimum Limits:
General Aggregate $ 2,000,000
Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $ 2,000,000
Each Occurrence Limit $ 1,000,000
Personal/Advertising Injury $ 1,000,000
Fire Damage (Any One Fire) $ 50,000
Medical Payments (Any One Person) $ 5,000
Coverage to include:
Premises and Operations
Explosions, Collapse and Underground Hazards
Personal / Advertising Injury
Products / Completed Operations
Liability assumed under an Insured Contract (including defense costs assumed under
contract)
Independent Contractors
Designated Construction Project(s) General Aggregate Limit, ISO CG 2503 (1997
Edition) or equivalent
Additional Insured—Owners, Lessees or Contractors Endorsement, ISO Form 2010
(2004 Edition) or equivalent
Additional Insured—Owners, Lessees or Contractors Endorsement, ISO CG 2037
(2004 Edition) or equivalent
The policy shall be endorsed to include the following additional insured language
on the Additional Insured Endorsements specified above: “County, its subsidiary,
parent, associated and/or affiliated entities, successors, or assigns, its elected
officials, trustees, employees, agents, and volunteers named as an additional insured
with respect to liability and defense of suits arising out of the activities performed
by, or on behalf of the Contractor, including completed operations”.
3) Auto Liability: Bodily injury and property damage for any owned,
hired and non-owned vehicles used in the performance of this Contract.
Minimum Limits: Statutory
Coverage Bodily/Property Damage (Each Accident)
$ 1,000,000
4) Special Coverages (check as appropriate and insert amount):
a. ☐ Performance Bond $
b. ☐ Professional Errors and Omissions
c. ☐ Aircraft Liability
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
6
d. ☐ Owner’s Protective
e. ☐ Builder’s Risk
f. ☐ Boiler and Machinery
g. ☐ Loss of Use Insurance
h. ☐ Pollution Liability
i. ☐ Crime, including Employee Dishonesty Coverage, or Fidelity
Bond
B. Proof of Insurance:
1) Each insurance policy required by the insurance provisions of this
Agreement shall provide the required coverage and shall not be suspended,
voided or canceled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been
given to the County, except when cancellation is for non-payment of
premium, then ten (10) days prior notice may be given. Such notice shall
be emailed directly to Procurement@pitkincounty.com. If the insurance
carrier will not provide the required notice, the Consultant/Contractor and
or its insurance broker shall notify the County of any cancellation, or
reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance within seven (7) days of
receipt of insurers’ notification to that effect. Simultaneously with the
Certificates of Insurance, the Contractor shall file with the Procurement
Officer a certified statement as to claims pending against the required
coverages, reserves established on account of such claims, defense costs
expended and amounts remaining on policy limits.
2) In addition, these Certificates of Insurance shall contain the following
clauses:
a. The contractor’s insurance shall be primary and non-contributory with
any insurance or self-insurance purchased by the County.
b. The insurance companies issuing the policy or policies hereunder shall
have no recourse against the County of Pitkin for payment of any
premiums or for assessments under any form of policy.
c. Any and all deductibles or self-insured retentions in the above-
described insurance policies shall be assumed by and be for the
amount of, and at the sole expense of the Contractor.
d. Location of operations shall be: “all operations and locations at which
work for the referenced Project is being done.”
3) Certificates of Insurance for all renewal policies shall be delivered to
the Procurement Officer at least fifteen (15) days prior to a policy’s expiration
date except for any policy expiring on the expiration date of this contract or
thereafter.
4) The County reserves the right to request and receive a copy of any
policy and any policy endorsement at any time during the term of this
Agreement.
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
7
XIII. Exemptions and Preferences. All purchases of construction or building or any other
materials for this Agreement shall not include Federal Excise Taxes or Colorado State or
local sales or use taxes. Pitkin County is exempt from such taxes under registration
numbers 98-02624 and 84-78000-5k.
XIV. Records. The Contractor shall maintain comprehensive, complete and accurate
books, records, and documents concerning its performance relating to this Agreement
for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement and the County
shall have the right within the three (3) year period to inspect and audit these books,
records and documents, upon demand, in a reasonable manner and at reasonable times,
for the purpose of determining, by accepted accounting and auditing standards,
compliance with all provisions of the Agreement and applicable law.
XV. Contract Made in Colorado. The parties agree that this Agreement was made in
accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and shall be so construed. Venue is
agreed to be exclusively in the courts of Pitkin County, Colorado.
XVI. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that legal action is necessary to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs
and reasonable attorney’s fees.
XVII. Governmental Immunity. Contractor agrees and understands that Pitkin County is
relying on and does not waive, by any provision of this Agreement, the monetary
limitations or terms (presently $150,000 per person and $600,000 per occurrence) or
any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental
Immunity Act, 24-10-101, et seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or otherwise
available to Pitkin County or any of its officers, agents or employees. Further, nothing
in this Agreement shall be construed or interpreted to require or provide for
indemnification of the Contractor by the County for any injury to any person or any
property damage whatsoever which is caused by the negligence or other misconduct of
the County or its agent or employees.
XVIII. Current Year Obligations. The parties acknowledge and agree that any payments
provided for hereunder or requirements for future appropriations shall constitute only
currently budgeted expenditures of Pitkin County. Pitkin County’s obligations under
this contract are subject to Pitkin County’s annual right to budget and appropriate the
sums necessary to provide the services set forth herein. No provisions of the contract
shall constitute a mandatory charge or requirement in any ensuing fiscal year beyond
the then current fiscal year of Pitkin County. No provision of the contract shall be
construed or interpreted as creating a multiple-fiscal year direct or indirect debt or other
financial obligation of Pitkin County within the meaning of any constitutional or
statutory debt limitation. This contract shall not directly or indirectly obligate Pitkin
County to make any payments beyond those appropriated for Pitkin County’s then
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
8
current fiscal year. No provisions of this contract shall be construed to pledge or create
a lien on any class or source of Pitkin County’s moneys, nor shall any provision of this
contract restrict the future issuance of Pitkin County’s bonds or any obligations payable
from any class or source of Pitkin County’s money.
XIX. Notice. Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing
and shall be provided by electronic delivery to the e-mail addresses set forth below and
by one of the following methods 1) hand-delivery or 2) registered or certified mail,
postage pre-paid to the mailing addresses set forth below. Each party by notice sent
under this paragraph may change the address to which future notices should be sent.
Electronic delivery of notices shall be considered delivered upon receipt of
confirmation of delivery on the part of the sender. Nothing contained herein shall be
construed to preclude personal service of any notice in the manner prescribed for
personal service of a summons or other legal process.
To Pitkin County:
Pitkin County Procurement
530 E. Main St., Suite #304
Aspen, CO 81611
Procurement@PitkinCounty.com
with copies to:
Pitkin County Attorney’s Office
530 E. Main St., Suite #301
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Attorney@pitkincounty.com
To Contractor:
Contractor Legal Entity
Contractor Street Address (Include Suite/Unit)
City, ST ZIP
Phone: ( ) -
Email: first.last@emailserver.com
XX. Public Contracts for Services and Public Contracts with Natural Persons. In
conformance with the provisions of C.R.S. §§ 8-17.5-101, et seq., as amended and
C.R.S. §§ 24-76.5-101, et seq., as amended:
A. PUBLIC CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES. §§8-17.5-101, et seq. C.R.S.
[Not applicable to agreements relating to the offer, issuance, or sale of securities,
investment advisory services or fund management services, sponsored projects,
intergovernmental agreements, or information technology services or products and
services] Contractor certifies, warrants, and agrees that it does not knowingly employ
or contract with an illegal alien who will perform work under this Agreement and will
confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired for
employment in the United States to perform work under this Agreement, through
participation in the E-Verify Program established under Pub. L. 104-208 or the State
verification program established pursuant to §8-17.5-102(5)(c), C.R.S., Contractor
shall not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien to perform work under this
Agreement or enter into a contract with a Subcontractor that fails to certify to
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
9
Contractor that the Subcontractor shall not knowingly employ or contract with an
illegal alien to perform work under this Agreement. Contractor (i) shall not use E-
Verify Program or State program procedures to undertake pre-employment screening
of job applicants while this Agreement is being performed, (ii) shall notify the
Subcontractor and the contracting State agency within 3 days if Contractor has actual
knowledge that a Subcontractor is employing or contracting with an illegal alien for
work under this Agreement, (iii) shall terminate the subcontract if a Subcontractor does
not stop employing or contracting with the illegal alien within 3 days of receiving the
notice, and (iv) shall comply with reasonable requests made in the course of an
investigation, undertaken pursuant to §8-17.5-102(5), C.R.S., by the Colorado
Department of Labor and Employment. If Contractor participates in the State program,
Contractor shall deliver to the contracting State agency, Institution of Higher Education
or political subdivision, a written, notarized affirmation, affirming that Contractor has
examined the legal work status of such employee, and shall comply with all of the other
requirements of the State program. If Contractor fails to comply with any requirement
of this provision or §§8-17.5-101 et seq., C.R.S., the contracting State agency,
institution of higher education or political subdivision may terminate this Agreement
for breach and, if so terminated, Contractor shall be liable for damages.
B. PUBLIC CONTRACTS WITH NATURAL PERSONS. §§24-76.5-101, et seq.,
C.R.S.
Contractor, if a natural person 18 years of age or older, hereby swears and affirms under
penalty of perjury that he or she (i) is a citizen or otherwise lawfully present in the
United States pursuant to federal law, (ii) shall comply with the provisions of §§24-
76.5-101 et seq., C.R.S., and (iii) has produced one form of identification required by
§24-76.5-103, C.R.S. prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement.
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first set out
herein above.
CONTRACTOR LEGAL ENTITY
________________________________________________
!#VENDOR SIGNATURE#! Date
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
MANAGER APPROVAL:
________________________________________________
!#COUNTY MANAGER#! Date
ATTORNEY APPROVAL:
________________________________________________
!#COUNTY ATTORNEY#! Date
Contract # 003.22 Revision: 2021.10.12 CDD
11
Any and all FAA required language and/or special provisions will be included as attachments to
this base services agreement at such time of contract initiation or at the issuance of individual
task orders under the agreement, as applicable.
RFP # 003.22
ADDENDUM # 1
Date: October 19, 2021
TO: All Proposers for the Updated Airport Layout Plan and Narrative Report for the
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport.
This letter is to provide additional documents and information regarding the Request for
Qualifications for the Updated Airport Layout Plan and Narrative Report for the Aspen/Pitkin
County Airport which was recently submitted to your company for review.
The following links and/or documents are hereby incorporated as reference material to
evidence existing conditions and insight from our most recent community visioning and
outreach process.
Please copy/paste the below link into your web browser to view the ASE Vision Process
and Materials:
https://www.aspenairport.com/operation/planning/ase-vision-resources/
The existing Airport Layout Plan and Common Ground Recommendations Map are of
particular interest in regard to this process, and they are available by following the
below guidance:
• Existing ALP: The most up-to-date ALP, dated May 9, 2016, is embedded
within the above link and viewable by expanding the “Technical Working
Group (TWG)” menu, direct document link provided below. A revision of this
ALP is currently with the FAA for approval of recent minor changes and will
be made available to potential respondents should it be approved prior to the
close for submissions.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ua-
hmSeNzF0cA76QLdpWZtnEsHGyALln/view
• Common Ground Recommendations Map: The referenced map was
generated by the Airport Vision Committee (AVC) and was presented during
Work Session #8 on March 5, 2020. The map is viewable by expanding the
“Airport Vision Committee (AVC)” menu and scrolling to the links provided
under Work Session #8, direct document link provided below.
https://389kndfjeyc2zewjj3xg9k4w-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-
content/uploads/2020/09/Work-Session-8-Common-Ground-
Recommendations-Map-PDF.pdf
Thank you for reviewing this Request for Proposals and considering submitting a proposal.
If you have any further questions regarding this addendum, please contact
Procurement@PitkinCounty.com
COMMON GROUND RECOMMENDATIONS
G 65
0
G 650
ATCOMEX RIGID 15000LATCOMEX RIGID 15000L
SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T
Cessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJetCessna CitationJet
SKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TCITATION X
CITATI
O
N
XCITATION XCITATION X
CITATION X
CITATIO
N
XG 650G 650G 65
0
G 650
CITATION X
CITATI
O
N
XG 650G 650CITATION XCITATION XCITATION X
CITATION
XG 650G 650CITATION X
CITATIO
N
XCITATION X
CITATIO
N
X
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T
G 65
0
G 650
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182TCITATION XCITATION XCITATION X
CITATI
O
N
X
CITATION
X
CITATION
X
G 650G 650SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182
T
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T
CITATION X
CITATIO
N
X
CITATION X
CITATIO
N
X
CITATION X
CITATIO
N
X
CITATION
X
CITATION XG 650G 650
G 65
0 G 650G 65
0 G 650G 65
0 G 650G 65
0 G 650G 65
0 G 650SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T
G 650
G
6
5
0
CIT
A
T
I
O
N
X
CITATION X
CIT
A
T
I
O
N
X
CITATION X CITATION X
CITATI
ON X
CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X CITATION X
Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJet Cessna CitationJetSKYLANE 182TSKYLANE 182T
SKYLANE 182T SKYLANE 182T
STORMWATER QUALITY
AND RETENTION FACILITY
RESERVED FOR SOLAR FARM
RUNWAY 15/33A3A2A1 A4A5A6A8A7B10B9B
TAXIWAY A
AIRCRAFT DEICING FACILITY
TAXIWAY A9
STANDARD GEOMETRY
LARGE ITINERANT AIRCRAFT
BERMS WITH SOUND WALLS
TRANSIT RAIL CORRIDOR
VEHICLE SERVICE ROAD
RECONSTRUCT TO MEET STANDARDS
EXPAND AOC BUILDING AND
STAGING AREA FOR SRE
FUTURE TOWER RELOCATION
BASED AIRCRAFT APRON
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE LOADING AREA
SHORT TERM PARKING WITH INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SOLAR AND EV
FBO TERMINAL
BERMS WITH SOUND WALLS
RENTAL CAR PREP AND STACKING
WITH INFRASTRUCTURE FOR
SOLAR AND EV
UNDERGROUND OWL CREEK
HANGAR
FBO PARKING
UNDERGROUND OWL CREEK
2 - REMAIN OVERNIGHT (RON) PARKING POSITIONS
GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (GSE) PARKING
POTENTIAL EXPANSION FOR
ADDITIONAL GA AIRCRAFT
HIGHWAY 8
2
GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (GSE) MAINTENANCE
FUEL FARM
MAINTENANCE
HANGAR
TERMINAL
75K - 90K SF
RESERVE FOR TRANSIT WITH COVERED WALKWAY
POTENTIAL ABC CIRCULATOR
GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (GSE) PARKING
RENTAL CAR READY /RETURN WITH
INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SOLAR AND EV
SPACE RESERVATION FOR ONE GATE ADDITION
TEMPORARY
OPERATIONAL
EXCEPTION
SELF SERVE AV GAS
PILOT'S LOUNGE
ECONOMY AND EMPLOYEE PARKING WITH
INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SOLAR AND EV
A9INCREASE RUNWAY WIDTH TO 150'
INCREASE TAXIWAY
SEPARATION TO 400'
NO IMPACT TO OPEN SPACE150'400'336'260'
POTENTIAL EXPANSION FOR
ADDITIONAL GA AIRCRAFT
RFQ # 003.22
ADDENDUM # 2
Date: November 19, 2021
TO: All Proposers for the Updated Airport Layout Plan and Narrative Report for Aspen/Pitkin
County Airport.
This letter is to clarify the Request for Qualifications for the Updated Airport Layout Plan and
Narrative Report for Aspen/Pitkin County Airport recently submitted to your company for
review.
The following clarifications or changes are required.
1. Question: Do all titles, section headers, banners, graphics and images require New
Times Roman 12 point font?
• Response: No. The County prefers uniformity with regard to the substantive
data and information provided by bidders/responders, but there is some
flexibility for the non-substantive aspects of bids/responses.
2. Question: Will the firm who is selected as prime for this project be precluded for
any future design work as prime or subconsultant?
• Response: No; unless a conflict of interest is identified that provides prime
contractor with an unfair advantage over other prospective bidders.
3. Question: Will any firms who serve as a subconsultant for this project be precluded
for any future design work as prime or subconsultant?
• Response: No, unless a conflict of interest is identified that provides the sub
consultant with an unfair advantage over other prospective bidders.
4. Question: Is the qualifications form limited to the 3 pages provided or may
additional pages be included if necessary? Is this form necessary since it is repetitive
of the information requested in the proposal?
• Response: Proposers may elect to propose qualifications on their own form.
If not utilizing the form as provided in the RFQ document, please indicate,
“In attached document(s)”, in the first open-text field. This equally applies
for Statement and Approach to Service and Qualifications of Personnel.
5. Question: The indemnification and defense provisions described in Article XI run
the risk of being held void and unenforceable based on Colorado’s anti-indemnity
statute, Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-50.5-102. Colorado statute bars indemnification
provisions unless the indemnification and defense obligations are limited to the
extent caused by the design professional’s breach of contract, negligence,
recklessness or intentional misconduct. Would you consider modifying the language
as shown below so that the design professional can provide the County with the
benefit of an indemnification and defense obligation that will be covered by
insurance proceeds and consistent with Colorado law?
XI. Indemnity.
A. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and, not excluding the County's
right to participate, defend the County, its subsidiary, parent, associated and/or
affiliated entities, successors, or assigns, its elected officials, trustees,
employees, agents, volunteers, and any jurisdiction or agency issuing permits for any
work included in the project,, hereinafter referred to as indemnitee, from all third-
party tort suits and claims, including reasonable attorney's fees and cost of litigation,
actions, loss, damage, expense, cost or claims of any character or any nature arising
out of the work done in fulfillment of the terms of this Agreement or on account of
any act, claim or amount arising or recovered under workers' compensation law or to
the extent caused by Contractors negligence or intentional misconduct arising out of
the failure of the Contractor to conform to any statutes, ordinances, regulation, law
or court decree. It is agreed that the Contractor will be responsible for primary loss
investigation, defense and judgment costs where this Agreement of indemnity
applies. In consideration of the award of this Agreement, the Contractor agrees to
waive all rights of subrogation against the County its subsidiary, parent, associated
and/or affiliated entities, successors, or assigns, its elected officials, trustees,
employees, agents, and volunteers for losses arising from the work performed by the
Contractor for the County.
B. The Contractor further shall investigate, process, respond to, adjust, provide
defense for and defend, pay or settle all claims, demands, or lawsuits related hereto
at its sole expense and shall bear all other costs and expenses related thereto, even if
the claim, demand or lawsuit is groundless, false or fraudulent.
• Response: As explained in the RFQ, proposers may make requests for
revisions to the contract terms in their proposal submissions. Requested
changes will be forwarded to the County legal team for consideration.
Thank you for reviewing this Request for Proposals and considering submitting a proposal.
If you have any further questions regarding this addendum, please contact
Procurement@PitkinCounty.com
121 Pearl Street, Ypsilanti, MI 48197 | Tel. 734 961 3200 | JacobsenDaniels.com 1
November 30, 2021
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
0233 E. Airport Rd. - Suite A
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Statement of Qualifications
Airport Layout Plan Update for Aspen/Pitkin County Airport (ASE)
Dear Sir or Ma’am;
On behalf of our strategic partnership, it is with great pleasure that Jacobsen|Daniels (J|D)
submits the attached Statement of Qualifications, in accordance with RFQ No. 003.22 – Airport
Layout Plan Update for Aspen/Pitkin County Airport. Formed in 2001, J|D is a professional
consulting services firm which offers an array of diversified technical and strategic advisory
services to the aviation industry. Over the last two decades, our seasoned team of aviation
professionals have been instrumental in optimizing airport operations and improving the
traveler’s journey at more than 100 airports across the United States, including ASE.
With regard to the referenced RFQ, we have reviewed all solicitation materials and have every
confidence that the team we’ve assembled stands prepared to deliver an unparalleled work
product which will build on prior planning work that’s been achieved and at the same time
preserve the spirit of the Airport Vision Committee’s 2020 Common Ground Recommendations
Report. In addition to the technical component, J|D is committed to fleshing out and fully
understanding those matters most important to the ASE community and building consensus
among key stakeholders. The attached Statement of Qualifications demonstrates our
understanding of the scope of work and outlines our collaborative approach to providing
services. Specific details evidencing our team’s qualifications and experience providing similar
services to airports is included in Section 2.
We acknowledge receipt of addenda 1 and addenda 2 and have no exceptions to the proposed
Master Service Agreement. Our qualification statement shall remain valid for sixty [60] days. If
selected, J|D is committed to quickly executing a Master Service Agreement with the Board of
121 Pearl Street, Ypsilanti, MI 48197 | Tel. 734 961 3200 | JacobsenDaniels.com 2
County Commissioners of Pitkin County. Any questions or additional selection process requests
may be submitted to me directly. On behalf of J|D and our partners, thank you for this
opportunity to present our qualifications, and we look forward to your favorable consideration
of our team.
Respectfully,
Bradley T. Jacobsen
Executive Vice President, Partner
121 Pearl St, Ypsilanti, MI 48197
Office: (734) 961-3200 | Mobile: (734) 730-3345
brad.jacobsen@jacobsendaniels.com
121 Pearl Street, Ypsilanti, MI 48197 | Tel. 734 961 3200 | JacobsenDaniels.com 3
Airport Layout Plan Update for Aspen/Pitkin County Airport (ASE) Jacobsen/Daniels LLC
Pitkin County Qualification Form Page 1 of 4
QUALIFICATIONS FORM
From: Jacobsen Daniels LLC
121 Pearl St.
Ypsilanti, MI 48197
Phone: (734) 961-3200 | Mobile: (734) 730-3345
brad.jacobsen@jacobsendaniels.com
To: Airport Layout Plan Update for the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
0233 E Airport Road
Aspen, CO 81611 Proposal Time: 2:00 PM MT
Proposal Date: November 30, 2021
Pursuant to a request by the Pitkin County Commissioners, the undersigned Proposer having examined this Request for Qualifications (RFQ), including the site of the proposed Service and being familiar with conditions surrounding the Service of the proposed Service, including the availability of materials and labor hereby proposed to furnish all labor, materials, supplies, applicable permits, services and supervision
required to perform the Service as detailed in this RFQ. DESCRIPTION:
Statement and Approach to Service:
Jacobsen|Daniels (J|D) believes that we understand ASE’s
core values and goals and, as noted in our Statement of Qualifications, we are keenly aware of the
airport’s vision as well as the commitments that have been made to date; we recognize the community’s
passion for preserving the character and culture of Aspen. If selected, J|D and our partners are
committed to engaging and working collaboratively alongside airport stakeholders and community
representatives. We understand that any proposed plans for ASE must align with the Common Ground
Recommendations, which must be thoughtfully addressed in the final ALP.
Airport Layout Plan Update for Aspen/Pitkin County Airport (ASE) Jacobsen/Daniels LLC
Pitkin County Qualification Form Page 2 of 4
QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER:
Please insert names address, phone numbers and description of similar Service for Reference Checks.
1.
2.
3.
In preparing a quality workplan, our team reviewed all solicitation materials and publicly available
documentation, including The Final Report of the Airport Vision Committee and current ALP. Our
workplan consists of three primary phases and one post-project phase as outlined below:
Phase 1: Discovery - Obtain sufficient information to complete and confirm our understanding
of the airport and its operations.
Phase 2: Data Compilation & Analysis - Analyze all materials to completely and accurately
assess the current state of affairs and the needs of the ASE stakeholders and community.
Phase 3: ALP Update - Prepare the ALP update, including all components and deliverables.
Phase 4: NEPA Processing (Post-Project) - Review the updated ALP relative to the NEPA
documentation to determine if project changes have been adequately addressed in the NEPA
document; prepare supplemental materials as necessary.
All work will be performed by skilled and qualified professionals in full accordance with applicable
Advisory Circulars, including:
AC 150/5070-6B Airport Master Plans
AC 150/5300-13 Airport Design
AC 150/5050-4A Community Involvement in Airport Planning
AC 150/5300-16 Aeronautical Surveying
AC 150/5300-17 Airport Imagery
AC 150/5300-18 Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards
SOP 2.00 Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (ALPs)
Richard C. Belotti - Vice President, Planning
Allegheny County Airport Authority
RBelotti@FlyPittsburgh.com
(412) 472-3545
Mr. James Hay - Director of Development
Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority
jamesh@mscaa.com
(901) 922-8224
Karen Korir, A.A.E. - Managing Aviation planner
Houston Airport system
karen.korir@houstontx.gov
(281) 233-1124
Airport Layout Plan Update for Aspen/Pitkin County Airport (ASE) Jacobsen/Daniels LLC
Pitkin County Qualification Form Page 3 of 4
QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL:
Please list assigned personnel and their qualifications:
Personnel #1. Bradley Jacobsen
Qualifications:
List of similar service performed:
Reference Name & Phone Number: Erin O’Donnell, Deputy Commissioner of Aviation MDW (former)
Chicago Department of Aviation
5757 S. Cicero Ave.
Chicago, IL 60638
c: (708) 577-8939
e: Erin.ODonnell@xcedgse.com
Bryant W. Holt, C.M., Chief Development Officer
Wayne County Airport Authority
11050 Rogell Dr. #602
Detroit, MI 48242
o: (734) 942-3745
e: Bryant.Holt@wcaa.us
Personnel #2. Jacob N. Sotsky
Qualifications:
List of similar service performed:
Reference Name & Phone Number: James Hay, Director of Development Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority
2491 Winchester Road, Suite 113
Memphis, TN 38116-3856
o: (901) 922-8224
c: (901) 237-5837
e: jhay@flymemphis.com
Co-founder/Co-owner of national aviation planning firm. Over 30 years of airport
planning and development experience, including master plans, ALP updates, on-call planning, Capital
Improvement Project (CIP) planning, and major project and program implementation. Adept at
stakeholder communication/coordination, consensus building and critical issue resolution. Works
effectively with airport owners, civic and political leaders, technical experts, and the public.
Mr. Jacobsen has lead Master Plans and ALP Updates for DTW,
MDW, and TVC among other airports; CIP planning and development; strategic planning; land use plans;
program management; strategic, financial, and operational analysis; procurement and development
strategy development.
Director of Airport Planning services for J|D with more than 16 years of airport planning
and development experience including a focus on landside and terminal projects. Experience includes
master plans (with AGIS/ALP updates), on-call planning, and program implementation. Unique
experience with complex projects which require careful planning and phasing prior to implementation
including carrying projects from planning through construction to ensure success.
Airport Master Plans & ALP Updates (DTW, MEM, MSY, RIC, SAN).
On-Call Planning (RIC, LAX, SMF, SFO, SEA, BHM, PDX, SAN).
Airport Layout Plan Update for Aspen/Pitkin County Airport (ASE) Jacobsen/Daniels LLC
Pitkin County Qualification Form Page 4 of 4
Personnel #3. Vince Hamilton
Qualifications:
List of similar service performed:
Reference Name & Phone Number: Bill Zrioka, Division Manager
Houston Airport System
1900 Galveston Rd
Houston, TX 77034 o: (281) 233-1364
e: William.Zrioka@houstontx.gov
Brooks Andrews, GIS Program Manager
Houston-Galveston Area Council 5213 Center St
Pasadena, TX 77505
o: (713) 993-4519
e: brooks.andrews@h-gac.com
It is further understood that the right is reserved by the County to reject any and all Statements of Qualifications.
The Proposer acknowledges receipt of Addenda Nos. One and Two
The right is reserved to waive any informalities and to reject any Statement of Qualifications.
Date this 29th Day of NOVEMBER , 2021
PROPOSER: Jacobsen/Daniels Associates LLC
Bradley T. Jacobsen
Executive Vice President and Partner
121 Pearl St, Ypsilanti, MI 48197
Organized in the State of Michigan
SIGNATURES: If the proposal is being submitted by a Corporation, the Proposer should be signed by an officer, i.e. President or vice-president. The signature of the officer signing shall be attested to by the secretary and properly sealed. If the proposal is being submitted by an individual or a partnership, the proposal shall so indicate and be properly signed.
A geospatial expert with 35 years of CAD and GIS experience with project
management, FAA and GIS certifications. Eight of those years were spent at the Houston Airport System
as the Sr. GIS Project manager. Specializes in CAD/BIM/GIS interoperability and building GIS solutions to
meet airport needs, improving operational efficiencies, and data sharing across departments. Excellent
at mentoring airport staff to secure the most value from ALP/AGIS investments.
AGIS/ALP data lead for multiple airports including MEM, RIC, LAX,
IAH, EFD (Spaceport), and the FAA; created GIS web applications for IAH, EFD, HOU, MEM, RIC, DTW, and
others BIM to GIS conversion for IAH showcased by ESRI at international users.
Submitted by: Bradley T. Jacobsen
Executive Vice President | Chief Operating Officer
Office: (734) 961-3200 | Mobile: (734) 730-3345
brad.jacobsen@jacobsendaniels.com
UPDATED AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN & NARRATIVE REPORT
PITKIN COUNTY | ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT (ASE)
RFQ #003.22 ***SEALED QUALIFICATIONS***
November 30, 2021
we see the journey, differently...
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 2
Jacobsen/Daniels Associates, LLC (J/D) is a DBE-certified professional consulting services firm specializing
in airport planning, implementation support, operations, and management. Founded in 2001, J/D has completed
a wide range of airport planning, implementation, and operations services at more than 100 small, medium, and
large-hub commercial airports throughout the U.S., including Aspen/Pitkin County Airport (ASE). We are pleased
about the prospect of serving ASE once again and respectfully submit the following statement of interest, detailing
our understanding of the project, our prosed approach to the scope of work, and our team’s qualifications.
Project Understanding
J|D understands that the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) of Pitkin County wishes to obtain and review
statements of professional qualifications from experienced consulting firms demonstrating expertise in the areas
of Master Planning and developing and updating Airport Layout Plans (ALPs). The BOCC will utilize this
information to select a qualified and responsible partner to review and update the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) and
produce a detailed Narrative Report for ASE.
Acknowledging the ‘Why Behind the What’. J|D understands that Pitkin County recently completed an extensive
process to establish a set of Common Ground Recommendations to improve ASE in a manner consistent with
community values and goals. Based on our first-hand observations of that process and subsequent review of
available information, we believe that these Common Ground Recommendations ultimately represent the
ambitious goal of making ASE the safest, friendliest, and greenest airport in the country. As such, we submit that
the success of the ALP update will require a skilled and dexterous partner - one who brings not only the required
technical capabilities, but also the cultural awareness, foresight, and expertise to effectively aid the airport in
identifying and navigating the optimum path forward. Stated directly - the selected partner must be prepared
to translate the Airport Vision Committee’s Recommendations into a feasible Airport Layout Plan which
is acceptable to the FAA.
To that end, J|D has assembled a group of seasoned aviation professionals and subject matter experts for this
endeavor. The J|D team brings a distinct perspective of the project and the core challenges facing ASE. We
are confident that our team stands prepared to assist the airport with developing a practical plan to advance the
airport’s vision and achieve its goals in a manner that aligns with its commitments to the Aspen community. Given
these presuppositions, we believe there are three tenets necessary for a successful engagement:
• Coordinate early and often with airport stakeholders, including the airlines, the FAA, and the GA
Community. Be clear about goals and allow stakeholders to provide feedback (a vested stakeholder group
increases the chances of success!)
• Keep the commitments that have been made to the community and the vision in the forefront at all times.
When potential conflicts arise, keep the public informed, educated, and engaged so they understand what
is happening and why. Leverage proactive, open, and transparent communication.
• Demonstrate technical capability and professional project management – craft messaging that is clear,
concise, and technically sound so that it resonates with the local community.
Based on our understanding of the airport’s values and goals, we believe that an unwavering commitment to
these tenets will be just as important as the technical qualifications our team brings, and therefore are equally
critical to the final success of the project. We assert this based on our prior experience serving ASE (J|D and
several team members were engaged at ASE during the evolution and development of the Vision Committee and
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 3
were witness to their remarkable achievements). We appreciate the vision and commitments made to date and
recognize the community’s passion for preserving the character and culture of Aspen. If selected, J|D and our
partners are committed to engaging and working collaboratively alongside airport stakeholders and community
representatives to evaluate pertinent needs and facts, facilitate open and transparent dialogue, and build consensus
on a realistic path forward for ASE. We understand that any proposed plans for ASE must align with the Common
Ground Recommendations (below) and must be thoughtfully addressed in the final ALP.
✓Safety
✓Reduce greenhouse gas and other pollutant emissions by at least 30%
✓Manage the growth of enplanements to be consistent with approximately 0.8% growth/year
✓Reduce noise by at least 30%
Further, we recognize that certain project details and requirements may be vague and fluid at this stage of planning. J|D prides itself on customer service and attentiveness to customer needs - if selected, we will remain flexible as we
work with stakeholders to elicit key details and requirements, explore concerns, and build support around ideas.
Our core team will work closely with ASE leadership to fully plan and execute the project scope, package results,
and generate support for the solution. We anticipate that certain components of the ALP may be updated over
multiple iterations in response to stakeholder feedback and concerns, community values, restrictions, constraints, and legal requirements. A brief outline of key project components is presented below.
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 4
The ALP. The Airport Layout Plan (ALP) is a critical planning tool for airports that provides key decision-makers
and other stakeholders with an accurate and up-to-date depiction of existing facilities as well as line-of-sight on
near-term and long-term planned development. The ALP presents this information as a carefully developed and
scaled set of drawings, plans, views, and profiles which illustrates the current and future airport infrastructure and
ordinarily includes the following:
• Title Sheet
• Airport Layout Drawing
• Airport Airspace Drawing
• Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawing
• Terminal Area Drawing
• Land Use Drawing
• Runway Departure Surfaces Drawing
• Airport Property Map
Having ready access to this insight allows airports to properly plan for vital resources to satisfy current and
future demand in a practical and financially responsible manner. Further, an FAA-approved ALP, developed in
accordance with the current version of FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13 Airport Design, is a prerequisite
for receiving Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants. For these reasons, the ALP update must fully comply
with current FAA design standards and planning criteria and must clearly demonstrate the preservation and
continuity of safety, utility, and efficiency of the airport to the satisfaction of the FAA. J|D is intimately familiar
with the applicable FAA Advisory Circulars and is supported by an impressive team of experienced aviation
professionals and subject matter experts, each bringing extensive knowledge and experience to the project.
The Narrative Report. The Narrative Report augments the ALP by providing airport stakeholders with a clearly
written narrative of key findings, development criteria, and the rationale behind proposed airport improvements.
The document is intended to be presented in a relatable and easy-to-understand format. In accordance with FAA
Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6B Airport Master Plans and SOP 2.00 - Standard Procedure for FAA Review
and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (ALP), the Narrative Report must at least contain the following elements:
• Basic aeronautical forecasts
• Basis for the proposed items of development
• Rationale for unusual design features and/or
modifications to FAA Airport Design Standard
• Summary of the various stages of airport
development and layout sketches of the major
items of development in each stage
NEPA Processing.Throughout the project, we will carefully consider National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
requirements and implications to guide the development of practical alternatives and scenarios for ASE. Our team
will work in close coordination with key stakeholders, including the FAA, to evaluate and plan for potential NEPA
impacts as the ALP evolves. While it is anticipated that some NEPA processing will be required once the final
plan has been presented to the FAA, this early focus on environmental impacts will minimize the time and level
of effort required for NEPA approval and provide the best chance at obtaining an expedited approval from the
FAA. Further, regulatory matters aside, we will also ensure that the vision and the environmental commitments
that have been made to the community are maintained.
Apart from the core technical services necessary to develop a quality ALP and Narrative report, J|D understands
that 1.) any proposed airport development must align with the community identity, values, and goals, and 2.)
strong stakeholder engagement and effective communication will play indispensable roles in the ultimate success
of the project. Our proposed work plan for achieving these goals is presented in the next section.
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 5
Proposed Work Plan
In preparing a quality workplan, J|D reviewed all solicitation materials and publicly available documentation,
including The Final Report of the Airport Vision Committee and current ALP. Further, we believe that our recent
consulting experience at ASE provides our team with a unique insight into the values of the local community
as well as the conditions and constraints surrounding the airport. Given this foundation, J|D and our partners
leveraged our expertise and industry know-how to prepare a flexible, practical, and efficient workplan to generate
win-win-win solutions (airlines-airport-community) for this endeavor. All work will be performed by skilled
and qualified professionals in full accordance with applicable AC. We acknowledge the scope of services and
deliverables, as outlined in the RFQ and further dictated by FAA:
• AC 150/5070-6B Airport Master Plans
• AC 150/5300-13 Airport Design
• AC 150/5050-4A Community Involvement in
Airport Planning
• AC 150/5300-16 Aeronautical Surveying
• AC 150/5300-17 Airport Imagery
• AC 150/5300-18 Geographic Information
System (GIS) Standards
• SOP 2.00 Standard Procedure for FAA Review
and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (ALPs)
Basic Description of Scope of Services. As noted above and further detailed in Section 2, J|D has performed and
supported a wide range of airport planning projects, including more than 20 ALP update projects of comparable
magnitude and complexity. Given our understanding of 1.) the ASE environment, 2.) the needs identified in the
RFQ, 3.) our intimate knowledge of FAA requirements, and 4.) our team’s collective history of successfully
delivering similar projects, we have proposed a comprehensive, yet flexible scope of services. The level of detail
presented below is intended to serve as an executive-level roadmap, rather than an exhaustive list of every task to
be performed. The J|D team will work closely with Airport Management, the Airport Advisory Board, the BOCC,
and any other project stakeholders to keep all parties appropriately abreast of the project’s progress. Throughout
the project, J|D will maintain a continuous focus on efficiency and effectiveness, while ensuring that quality is
never compromised.
PHASE 1: DISCOVERY (2-3 Months, Ongoing)
After identifying key points of contact for stakeholders, J|D will coordinate meetings with
stakeholder groups, arrange for site visits, and issue Requests for Information (RFIs)
to complete and confirm our understanding of the airport and its operations. J|D will
focus on understanding desired service levels and will document requirements, collect
and review relevant datasets, reports, and other informative artifacts, including site plans,
drawings, and all other pertinent data sources and documents necessary to conduct a
thorough analysis. General activities include:
KICKOFF MEETING (1 Day)
We propose beginning with a kickoff meeting with key stakeholders to align the expectations,
open initial dialog on the project’s scope, and identify the initial data components and
commitments necessary to secure the appropriate information and documentation from
all parties. This meeting will also serve as an opportunity for the J|D team to provide
stakeholders with an overview of the effort and identify key points of contact for the project.
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 6
✓Review of existing ALP documents and information (anticipated by Task Order 1)
✓Collect stakeholder feedback on prior ALP
✓Analyze Common Ground Recommendations from the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
Community Vision process
PHASE 2: DATA COMPILATION & ANALYSIS (6-8 Months)
The J|D Team will analyze all documents, plans, drawings, stakeholder feedback, and
other site artifacts to establish a complete and accurate assessment of the current state
of affairs with regard to the ASE operating environment, including the needs of the ASE
stakeholders and Aspen community-at-large. We will also analyze other key information
sources, including pertinent FAA Advisory Circulars, state laws, local airport regulations,
industry service data, current best practices, and other benchmarks. General activities
include:
✓Evaluate existing Environmental Assessment for project implementation
✓Acquire aerial ortho-photography
✓Perform Obstruction Survey
✓Conduct stakeholder meetings, interviews, focus groups, and other sessions as
necessary to capture and validate community goals, vision, and values
PHASE 3: ALP UPDATE (4-6 Months, Interactive)
After completing the necessary site visits and meetings and receiving and analyzing
information requested in Phase 1, we will begin preparing the ALP update, including all
components and other deliverables as specified in the RFQ. As the plan begins to take
shape, the J|D Team will work in close coordination with key stakeholders to address
important questions and concerns. J|D will also proactively identify environmental
concerns to ensure they are identified early and appropriately planned for (see PHASE 4).
All information will be fully documented in a formal draft report which will be shared with
ASE for additional feedback and comments (see figure on next page). General activities
include:
✓Prepare Planimetics in FAA AGIS format
✓Prepare a phased capital project implementation plan and roadmap
✓Update the airport’s aircraft operational and passenger forecasts
✓Prepare updates to the Airport Layout Plan (All pages)
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 7
Delivery & Presentation of Final Report. After incorporating stakeholder feedback into the final plan, the J|D
Team will prepare and distribute the draft final deliverable and schedule one or more meetings to present the
resulting ALP Update and Narrative Report to ASE. A final ALP Update and Narrative Report documenting
our findings and recommendations will be delivered to the working committee 10 days before the meeting.
PHASE 4: NEPA Processing (6-12 Months)
Once the core scope has been completed, J|D will remain available to assist in reviewing
the updated ALP relative to the recently completed NEPA documentation to determine if
project changes have been adequately addressed in the NEPA document. As suggested
above, it is anticipated that supplemental analysis may be required to fully demonstrate
NEPA compliance. If changes are required and are relatively minor from an environmental
impact standpoint, a supplemental analysis can be prepared to provide the necessary
information to demonstrate that the original NEPA decision holds valid. If the changes
are more material in nature, a formal supplemental Environmental Assessment (EA) may
be required. The specific details of such a supplemental EA would be discussed with the
FAA in advance of any work and the scope would be narrowed to focus solely on those
areas requiring additional analysis and investigation. The intent of any supplemental
strategy will be to ensure NEPA compliance while maintaining the appropriate level of
public involvement and transparency. It is likely that the FAA will require a Section 163
(FAA reauthorization Act of 2018) to be filed in advance of any supplemental analysis
(i.e., the analysis and description of the proposed project will need to be adapted as
appropriate in the documentation associated with the supplemental review). Our team has
extensive experience navigating supplemental NEPA strategies and addressing Section
163 determinations which will help to expedite a NEPA compliance determination.
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 8
Proposed Project Schedule. J|D acknowledges and concurs with the BOCC’s time estimate of 16-18 months
(or approximately 12 months after substantial receipt of all requested/necessary information). Our schedule is
predicated on the availability of information and the commitment of key stakeholders to achieve results in a timely
manner. The plan of action outlined in this Statement of Qualifications is intended to provide a preliminary and
high-level overview of the tasks necessary to successfully meet the identified goals of the project. This proposed
scope of services is not intended, nor expected, to occur in a perfectly linear fashion, and J|D and our partners
will make every effort to execute tasks as efficiently as possible while ensuring the highest level of quality in the
performance of services. Our project plan and schedule will be subject to final approval by ASE.
Deliverables. J|D acknowledges the deliverables required by both the solicitation as well as by the applicable
FAA Advisory Circulars and is prepared to deliver a complete ALP set and Exhibit A update which will be fully
compatible with AGIS file structure and compliant with all associated FAA AC. Anticipated deliverables are
displayed below:
✓Airport Layout Plan Set including (hardcopy and electronic formats):
•Cover Sheet
•Existing Conditions Sheet
•Future Conditions Sheet
•Ultimate Conditions Sheet
•Airport Data Sheet
•Terminal Layout (Existing, Future, and Ultimate) Sheet
•Existing and Future Airport Airspace Plan, Profile, and Obstruction Tables Sheets
•Existing and Future Inner Approach Surface Plan, Profile, and Obstruction Table Sheets
•Existing and Future Departure Surface Plan, Profile, and Obstruction Table Sheets
•Airport Land Use (Existing, Future, and Ultimate) Sheet
•Exhibit A Airport Property Map Sheet
✓Electronic AGIS files
✓AutoCAD Files
✓Color Ortho-Photography (6” or better resolution)
✓Narrative Report
✓Aviation Forecast (Operational and Passenger)
✓Phased Capital Project Implementation Plan
✓Submission to FAA and subsequent FAA Approval
✓Access to the HALO System (described below)
✓Internal GIS-Based Website (described below)
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 9
To further leverage our HALO framework, we are proposing two additional deliverables associated with the ALP/
Exhibit A update.
✓First, we understand that the Vision Committee is committed to total transparency with the community.
As such, we recognize that effective communication with the Committee and the public will be a critical
success factor for the project team as well. To facilitate open communications, we propose creating a
GIS-based website to showcase ALP data, with overlays of the final CAD files from the Airport Vision
Committee. This website will establish a streamlined ‘pull communication’ interface for the airport and its
stakeholders. The website would support bi-directional communication by allowing committee members
and airport staff to “drop points” on the map and share comments. Comment points will include the original
comment as well as associated replies. These comments could then be filtered by committee working
groups with a dashboard that addresses the status of each comment and allows leadership to quickly
determine when all comments have been addressed. To accomplish this, J|D will collaborate with our team
member, Project Resource Studio, to drive the content and develop effective and informative dashboard
elements based on input from ASE and other key stakeholders.
✓A second key deliverable from our team will be an internal GIS website for airport staff, thereby taking
the ALP out of the flat files. We understand that Pitkin County currently uses the ArcGIS platform from
ESRI (J|D is a Bronze-Certified ESRI Partner) with a portal that is already configured. Building on this,
we propose creating an aviation group on the existing County portal that can be tailored and secured for
ASE/Pitkin County staff. This will provide the ASE staff with a suite of tools and ready access to data
which is critical to daily operations. Further, the licenses may already be available through the County if
an enterprise license with ESRI is in place, making this a very cost-effective option.
Verizon 12:55 PM 79%Verizon 12:55 PM 79%
Project Team
J|D is pleased to present our team’s Statement of Qualifications for consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners of Pitkin County. Based on our understanding of local stakeholder requirements, as well as our
first-hand experience updating ALP/eALP documents and our in-depth knowledge of relevant FAA Advisory
Circulars, we are confident that we’ve assembled a team that meets all necessary qualifications and is prepared to
deliver a quality ALP Update project for the ASE stakeholder group. It should be noted that each of our partners
– Project Resources Studio, NV5 Geospatial, Environmental Science Associates, and Kimley Horn – was
deliberately sought for this project - we are not simply a team of convenience. Many of our firms have worked
together in the past, or are currently working together, on projects across the nation. Further, several of our team
members have had recent successes serving ASE. This section describes our team’s technical experience and core
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 10
capabilities which we believe demonstrate our ability to meet the needs of this project. Each partner is expected
to bring complementary and synergistic skill sets to the team to ensure we are prepared to deliver the best possible
project experience and work product for ASE.
Jacobsen|Daniels (J|D) is well versed in project and program management and will serve as the Prime Contractor
for the ASE ALP update project. Founded in 2001, J|D is a DBE-certified professional consulting services firm
specializing in airport planning and programming, implementation support, and operational services. Over the
last 20+ years, J|D has successfully served more than 100 airports in the U.S. to deliver or assist with Master
Planning, ALP/eALP Updates, and various on-call planning assignments. Clients include small, medium, and
large-hub commercial airports as well as general aviation airports across the country.
J|D’s past master planning and technical update services include projects at hub airports, like LAX, MEM, HOU,
ORD, PIT, and SEA, and general aviation airports like Chicago/Gary International Airport (GYY), Willow
Run Airport (YIP), General DeWitt Spain Airport (M01), Charles W. Baker Airport (2M8), Miami Executive
Airport (TMB), and Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport (OPF). Additionally, J|D was recently awarded the
contract to provide Master Planning Consultancy Services at Louis Armstrong New Orleans International
Airport (MSY). Over the last 20 years, we have successfully led nearly every facet of airport planning, ranging
from strategic planning to landside/terminal/airside analyses, ALP and Exhibit A updates (including AGIS and
eALP requirements), airfield geometry and non-standard condition assessments, Environmental Assessments,
community outreach/engagement, etc.
In addition to our many successes serving airports authorities, J|D has experience working with various airport
agencies and organizations including airlines, FBOs, concessionaires, rental car agencies, and federal agencies,
including the TSA and FAA. Since 2014, J|D has served as an on-call contractor to FAA-HQ Office of Airports
where we provide support for developing Advisory Circulars, policy, engineering studies, various analyses,
research support, and other guidance. Several of our team members have extensive histories working with the
FAA, TSA, and other governmental agencies. We are intimately familiar with conducting airport planning,
design, and development projects that adhere to FAA Advisory Circulars and regulations as well as the applicable
AC and guidance relating to airspace, airfield design, property surveys, obstruction surveys, parcel maps, runway
approaches, Part 77 analyses, and OEI analyses.
Select projects illustrating the breadth of our industry experience are presented below:
✓Airport Master Plan: Gary/Chicago International, Memphis International Airport, General DeWitt
Spain Airport, and Charles W. Baker Airport, Pittsburgh International Airport, Detroit Metropolitan
International Airport
✓Development of the Programing Criteria Document and Implementation Plan: George Bush
Intercontinental Airport Mickey Leland International Terminal
✓Program Management and Advisory Services: Los Angeles International Airport Landside Access
Modernization Program
✓Program Management: Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport Modernization Program
✓Planning Technical Advisory Services: The Sacramento County Department of Airports
✓Airline Tenant Representative: Chicago O’Hare’s Modernization Program, Miami Dade County
International Airport
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 11
Project Resource Studio (PRS). Project Resource Studio is a local
DBE-certified strategic communications and project consulting
firm with a deep connection to the Aspen/Pitkin County
community and extensive experience facilitating public engagement initiatives. J|D understands that a community
involvement plan which identifies and engages key stakeholders is essential to capture public feedback and build
consensus as planning efforts progress. PRS’s services include developing and implementing comprehensive
strategic communication plans, engagement solutions, stakeholder outreach programs, public relations initiatives,
and other public facilitation services. PRS was previously engaged by Kimley-Horn to help facilitate the ASE
Vision process (2018-2020) and will aid the project team by developing a sound and carefully crafted community
involvement strategy that aligns with both the airport’s planning efforts and County’s values.
Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Founded in 1969, ESA is a multidisciplinary environmental consulting and planning firm. ESA’s staff of 500+ scientists,
planners, engineers, designers, and technical specialists have prepared thousands
of environmental studies for compliance with CEQA, NEPA, and other federal and
state environmental regulations and requirements. ESA partners with consultants and
airport operators to tackle complex issues affecting the development and operation of airports, including noise, environmental, and aviation planning services. The firm has successfully assisted
airport clients in receiving FAA approval on more than 200 projects that were subject to CEQA/NEPA review,
ranging from small development projects that received CatExes to Environmental Assessments for concourse
expansions and runway extensions to EISs for new runways. ESA is recognized as a national expert in the use of
FAA’s Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) for noise and air quality analyses, both identified as primary goals of the Vision Committee’s Common Ground Recommendations. J|D has worked with and alongside ESA on
several occasions. ESA will work hand-in-hand with the project team, stakeholders, and FAA to aid in reviewing
plans, consulting with Environmental Protection Specialist (EPS), and securing approval for relevant proposals.
ESA will also collaborate with the team to obtain FAA’s review and signoff on the NEPA-analysis scope of work.
On-CallMaster Planning
Forecasting / Finance
Geographic Information Systems
Management & Strategy
Construction Management
Project Management
Program Management
Asset Management
Owner’s Representation
Parking / Valet
Food & Beverage
Retail
News & Gift
P L A N NING
O
P
E
RATIONSIMPLEMENTATION
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 12
NV5 Geospatial - Quantum Spatial. Founded in 1969, NV5 Geospatial
is one of the largest and most experienced full-service geospatial
firms in the U.S. The company provides insights to organizations that
require geospatial intelligence such as comprehensive aerial mapping
and GIS services, including state-of-the-art photogrammetric, LiDAR,
satellite, airborne imaging, and mapping. NV5 has provided photogrammetry services for 700+ airport projects in
accordance with FAA AC 150/5300-16A, -17C, and -18B guidelines. Clients include a host of airport authorities
as well as local/county, state/regional, and federal agencies, and many of the top engineering and industrial firms in
North America. Throughout its long history, NV5 Geospatial has successfully delivered dozens of approved eALP
datasets, and numerous ALPs, Master Plans, and WAAS Surveys. NV5 Geospatial’s Airport/Airfield Experience
in the State of Colorado includes:
✓STK Sterling Municipal
✓EEO Meeker
✓EIK Erie Municipal
✓PUB Pueblo Memorial
✓DEN Denver International
✓4V0 Rangely
✓TAD Perry Stokes
✓ANK Harriett Alexander Field
✓PUB Pueblo Memorial
✓AKO Colorado Plains Regional
✓GJT Grand Junction Regional
✓PSO Stevens Field
✓FNL Northern Colorado Regional
✓AIB Hopkins Field
✓ALS San Luis Valley Regional Airport
NV5 staffs certified photogrammetrists, LiDAR specialists, pilots, professional engineers, licensed surveyors,
image processing specialists, GIS specialists, CAD technicians, and image analysts and is continuously developing
their technology and implementing the newest FAA standards. J|D has worked with and alongside NV5 on
numerous projects in recent years. The firm will support the ALP effort by supplying quality Ortho Photography
and other geospatial services as necessary to support obstruction surveys, FAA Airport Data and Information
Portal (ADIP, formerly AGIS) Survey, as-built surveys, and related aspects of the ALP Dataset.
Kimley-Horn. Kimley-Horn is one of the nation’s premier planning
and design consultants. With more than 5,600 employees in 100 offices
across the U.S., their full suite of aviation services includes planning
& environmental, design & engineering, as well as security, support and maintenance. Over the past five years, Kimley-Horn has provided
planning and engineering consulting services to hundreds of airports of all sizes throughout the nation (see map
at lower right), including airport planning and ALP updates, and planning activities that routinely complement
a long-term airport vision. Their aviation group has experience with planning projects at airports ranging in size
from general aviation, including non-hub airports such as ASE through larger airports such as SAN. J|D has worked with and alongside Kimley-Horn on several occasions in the past. With local offices in the Colorado
region and three years of direct experience serving ASE, they bring a deep understanding of the local culture
and airport operating environment. They will bring to project engineering services, direct knowledge of airfield
and airspace elements, and as needed, terminal and landside planning, including “right-sizing” of the passenger
terminal and supporting landside infrastructure.
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 13
Project Team & Key Personnel.Our team will be led by Mr. Brad Jacobsen and will be staffed by experienced
professionals who bring the necessary experience, skills, know-how, and acumen to perform each part of this
assignment. An overview of the proposed organization of the J|D team is presented below.
Environmental Assessment
(EA)
Public Communication &
Outreach
Airport Layout Plan
(AGIS)
Brad Jacobsen (J|D)
ProjectManager
Brad Jacobsen (J|D)
ProjectManager
Jacob Sotsky (J|D)
Assistant Project Manager
Jacob Sotsky (J|D)
Assistant Project Manager
Vince Hamilton (J|D)
AGIS Lead
Vince Hamilton (J|D)
AGIS Lead
Michael Arnold (ESA)
NEPA Lead
Michael Arnold (ESA)
NEPA Lead
Kathleen Wanatowicz, MBA (PRS)
Public Relations Lead
Kathleen Wanatowicz, MBA (PRS)
Public Relations Lead
H. Mavis Fitzgerald (PRS)
Public Relations Support
H. Mavis Fitzgerald (PRS)
Public Relations Support
Robert Vander Meer (NV5)
AGIS Support
Robert Vander Meer (NV5)
AGIS Support
David Grigg, GISP (NV5)
AGIS Support
David Grigg, GISP (NV5)
AGIS Support
ASE Airport
Vision Committee
ASE Airport
Vision Committee
Autumn Ward, CM, ENV SP (ESA)
NEPA Support
Autumn Ward, CM, ENV SP (ESA)
NEPA Support
Planning &
Engineering
Brian Jones (Kimley-Horn)
Planning & Engineering Lead
Brian Jones (Kimley-Horn)
Planning & Engineering Lead
Tom Schnetzer (Kimley-Horn)
Planning & Engineering Support
Tom Schnetzer (Kimley-Horn)
Planning & Engineering Support
J|D is committed to employing the industry’s top talent on each project we pursue. As such, the J|D team will
be composed of professionals from several organizations, acting in concert. Under the leadership and coordi-
nation of Mr. Jacobsen, the project team will operate as a single cohesive consulting unit to efficiently achieve
project objectives. If selected, J|D affirms that all work will be performed using the staff listed in this Statement
of Qualifications and all staff have sufficient availability to dedicate to project activities. Overviews for key
team members are provided below (expanded resumes are included as an attachment).
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 14
Bradley Jacobsen Executive Vice President, Jacobsen|Daniels
Mr. Jacobsen is co-founder and Executive Vice President of Jacobsen|Daniels. He has
nearly 30 years of experience in aviation capital program planning and development,
including extensive experience with strategic, technical, operational, and financial
analyses. He has served as Principal-in-Charge for numerous Strategic Plans, Master
Plans, Land Use Plans, and On-Call Planning and Program Management. Between
2016-2018, Mr. Jacobsen assisted ASE and Pitkin County with the procurement of
Program Management Services and Financial Consulting Services for the airport.
In this role, Mr. Jacobsen worked closely with airport staff and County leadership
in coordination with the FAA-ADO and other airport stakeholders. Mr. Bradley
will lead all aspects of the project, coordinate project resources, liaise with key
stakeholders, and be accountable for all deliverables.
Jacob Sotsky Director, Jacobsen|Daniels
Mr. Sotsky brings highly relevant experience in airport facility planning, master
planning, and implementation of capital projects. During his tenure with J|D, Mr.
Sotsky has led or played central roles in a range of projects around the United States,
including the Memphis International Sustainable Airport Master Plan Update,
the Master Plan updates of both General Aviation Airports within the Memphis-
Shelby County Airport Authority, and the Airport Development Plan and ALP
update (including Exhibit A) at San Diego International Airport. Mr. Sotsky will
support the J|D project team with planning, scheduling, reporting, and stakeholder
communications.
Vince Hamiliton Director, Jacobsen|Daniels
Mr. Hamilton is a Geographical Information Technology professional skilled in complex GIS implementations including project scoping, project planning, project
management, database development, database management, data collection, data
conversion, desktop application development, systems integration, and enterprise
web deployment. Mr. Hamilton has experience in managing QA/AC and implements
solutions conforming to “best practices.” Additionally, he has experience delivering eALPs that meet FAA criteria, including Houston Hobby Airport and George Bush
Intercontinental Airport. Mr. Hamilton will support the project team to collect,
organize, compile, analyze, and disseminate data.
H. Mavis Fitzgerald | Senior Associate, Project Resource Studio
Ms. Fitzgerald is a brand and public relations specialist with a comprehensive
background in media relations and brand marketing. She brings to the PRS team vast
experience as a communications and marketing specialist. She regularly approaches
complex PR matters with a creative and strategic approach to problem-solving,
communications, and public outreach. She is a skilled facilitator and has been
aligning project goals and outcomes of multifaceted marketing and communications
projects for over 15 years in both the public and private sectors. She recently supported
the City of Aspen’s Dockless Mobility Outreach effort (2019) as well as the Pitkin
County Open Space & Trails Public Input efforts (2018).
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 15
Kathleen Wanatowicz, MBA | Founder, Project Resource Studio
Ms. Wanatowicz is the founder and principal of PRS, where she serves as a marketing
and strategic communications consultant for governments, organizations, and other
major initiatives. For more than 17 years, she has worked in public communications
and engagement, focusing on community development projects and other issues
unique to rural areas. Ms. Wanatowicz is passionate about aligning communities
around shared visions and is effective in building consensus for public programs and
projects. From 2018-2020, Ms. Wanatowicz was instrumental in facilitating the ASE
Vision Project for Aspen/Pitkin County Airport. Other local projects include the
Aspen Pedestrian Mall redevelopment outreach program (2016-2019) and the Castle
Creek Trail public process and outreach program (2018-2019).for the New Orleans
Aviation Board. His expertise and familiarity with MSY and the NOAB staff will
make him an invaluable Strategic Advisor and resource for the team.
Robert Vander Meer | Director, NV5 Geospatial
Mr. Vander Meer is Vice President of NV5 Geospatial’s public market sector and
brings more than 19 years of management experience in the geospatial industry
to the team. Mr. Vander Meer has served as Director on over 700 airport projects under Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-
16A, -17C, -18B guidelines. His extensive experience will be a valuable asset during
the execution of the ALP update.
David Grigg, GISP Aviation Program Director, NV5 Geospatial
Mr. Grigg oversees NV5 Geospatial’s aviation programs with overall responsibility
for QA and QC of all project deliverables. With 20+ years of experience, he specializes
in the delivery of geospatial technical services to airports. He has worked with small,
medium, and large hub airports to conduct assessments and build enterprise road map
strategies to implement a wide range of solutions, including airspace management,
document discovery, land use, noise, and property management. He has completed
the Level 3 FAA Airport GIS IDLE training and has prepared and uploaded FAA
Airport GIS documentation and data for electronic Airport Layout Plans (eALP) as
well as other airport projects requiring compliance with the FAA’s AGIS Program.
He is URISA certified GIS Professional and a member of Esri’s Airports Industry
Advisory Board
Tom Schnetzer | Planner / Aviation, Kimley-Horn
Mr. Schnetzer has 34 years of experience in airport consulting, having served as a
trusted advisor to senior airport executives at airports of all sizes. He specializes in
master planning, terminal/landside planning and programming, strategic planning,
financial feasibility analyses, and capital program implementation. He has completed
37 master plans, including serving as a Program Manager for the Aspen/Pitkin
County Airport (ASE) program and facilitating the “ASE Vision” process.
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 16
Micheal Arnold, LEED AP | Senior Vice President, ESA
Mr. Arnold has more than 25 years of aviation planning, noise, and environmental
project experience at more than 120 domestic and international airports. He started
his career conducting airport and airspace simulation modeling for some of the most
complex airspace systems in the U.S. and has since prepared long-term development
programs for more than 25 airports, ranging from single runway GA airports to
large commercial service airports. He has managed and supported more than 35
airport noise and land-use related studies, and specializes in the identification of
operational modifications and land use controls to minimize noise impacts on
surrounding communities. Mr. Arnold’s role will be to guide the overall strategy
for the NEPA process and ensure that the approach being taken meets the goals and
objectives of the Airport sponsor, while also ensuring compliance with NEPA.
Autumn Ward, CM, ENV SP | Principal Consultant, ESA
Ms. Ward brings more than 15 years of experience in the aviation field. She has
a strong background in environmental planning, airport facility planning, noise
analysis, sustainability planning, and aviation safety. Her project experience has
included facilities ranging in size from small general aviation airports to major
large-hub air carrier airports in the U.S. and abroad. She is experienced with FAA
and airport certification requirements and skilled in documenting and presenting
the results of technical analyses in a manner that can be clearly understood by the
public. Additionally, Ms. Ward is also an expert in facilitating public outreach events
to maximize public participation, including in-person, virtual, and hybrid strategies.
Ms. Ward’s role will be to lead the day-to-day NEPA effort and to work closely with
the FAA to streamline the process while ensuring the supplemental analysis meets
the agency’s expectations.
Bob Jones | Senior Project Manager, Kimley-Horn
Mr. Jones has 37 years of planning, design, and construction experience at large
and small airports across the nation and is also a subject matter expert on FAA
airfield and design standards. He presently manages Kimley-Horn’s Denver aviation
practice and oversees its planning, design, and construction projects. Mr. Jones has consistently delivered projects of exceptional quality and was instrumental in the
Aspen -Pitkin County Airport (ASE) program.
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 17
Project Title Client Services Provided Relevance
Airport and Terminal
Area Master Plan
Eppley Airfield
(OMA)
Project Management; Airfield, General
Aviation, Support Facility, and Rental
Car Planning; Airport Layout Plan/AGIS
Comparable airport
planning and experience,
including ALP and AGIS
submittal
Airport Master Plan Mobile Downtown
Airport (BFM)
Exhibit A Property Map Development
and Ground Access Analysis
Comparable ALP experience
Policy Engineering
Analysis and Research
Support II
Federal Aviation
Administration
Policy support to FAA Office of Airports
(ARP) and Office of Environment and
Energy Research & Development
FAA Coordination and
Policy experience
Aviation Policy
Consulting Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
Policy support to FAA Office of Airports
(ARP)
FAA Coordination and
Policy experience
Airport Master Plan
Update
Gary/Chicago
International
Airport
(GYY)
Project Management; Landside,
Terminal and Airside Planning; Airport
Layout Plan/AGIS
Comparable airport planning
including ALP and AGIS
submittal
Airport Development
Plan
San Diego
International
Airport (SAN)
Landside and Terminal Planning;
Forecasting; Facility Inventory
Comparable airport planning
experience
Landside Acces
Modernization Program
Los Angeles
International
Airport
(LAX)
Landside Planning; Community
Engagement; Land-use Support;
Program Definition Documents
Comparable planning
experience on a major
development program;
coordination of stakeholders;
implementation support
On-Call Planning and
Airport Master Plan
Hartsfield-Jackson
Atlanta
International
Airport (ATL)
Airport, Support Facility and Terminal
Planning; Airport Layout Plan
Comparable airport planning
experience on an Airport
Master Plan and follow-on
On-Call Planning Services
Airport Master Plan
Update
Raleigh-Durham
International
Airport
(RDU)
Facility Inventory, Future Facility
Requirements, Facility Planning,
Community Engagement
Comparable airport planning
experience on an Airport
Master Plan
Airport Layout Plan
Update and Master Plan
Willow Run Airport
(YIP)
Airport Layout Plan update, Safety Risk
Analysis, Master Planning support,
Community engagement support
Comparable airport planning
experience on Airport
Master Plan and follow-on
On-Call Planning Services
LAX Program
Management
Advisory Services
Los Angeles
International
Airport
(LAX)
Developed ConRAC and ITF-W Program
definition documents;
Parking analysis for airport property
and the CTA and developed KPI’s
and dashboard; Led team of diverse
consultants and subject matter experts in
a dynamic on-call environment
Coordination of
stakeholders; follow-on
implementation support
Representative Projects
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 18
Memphis International Airport | Master Plan Update
Owner: Memphis-Shelby Co. Airport Auth.
Client: Memphis-Shelby Co. Airport Auth.
Dates: 2018 – Ongoing
References: James Hay
jamesh@mscaa.com
(901) 922-8224
In May 2018, the Memphis-Shelby County Airport
Authority (MSCAA) awarded J|D a $4.6M contract
to prepare new sustainable master plans for Memphis
International Airport (MEM), and MSCAA’s two
General Aviation Airports (General Dewitt Spain
Airport and Charles W. Baker Airport). J|D is
responsible for updating the master plan for MEM
and for developing new plans for Spain and Baker.
Each plan will reflect industry changes, update
forecast and growth projections, and establish
development priorities in consideration of recent and
pending improvements to facilities, while upgrading
the customer experience.The plans will also focus on
preparing each facility for emerging technologies
such as passenger screening advancements and
unmanned aerial systems, as well as planning for
sustainability and resiliency in the face of changing
economic and climate conditions. In developing
the sustainable master plans for each of the three
airports, J|D ensures compliance with the FAA’s AC
150/5070-6B Airport Master Plans - Change 2.
Pittsburgh International Airport | Project Airfield
Owner: Allegheny County Airport Authority
Client: Allegheny County Airport Authority
Dates: 2015 - Present
References: Richard C. Belotti
Vice President, Planning
RBelotti@FlyPittsburgh.com
(412) 472-3545
In 2015, J|D was awarded the contract to develop
portions of Pittsburgh International Airport’s Master
Plan Update. J|D’s focus was to assess PIT’s airfield
and support facilities and develop the associated
sections of the Master Plan Update in accordance
with FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6B
Airport Master Plans. In this role, J|D worked with
key stakeholders to assess current conditions and
identify anticicpated facility requirements through
demand / capacity analyses. After assessing existing
conditions and projected needs, J|D developed a series
of alternatives and proposed recommendations to
meet the airport’s goals and objectives. Improvements
included updating the airfield geometry and existing
non-standard conditions, which were incorporated
into the Airport Layout Plan (ALP). The airport
sponsor also reqeusted that J|D develop the ALP/
eALP update for PIT to reflect the results of the
Airport Master Plan. J|D coordinated with Quantum
Spatial to integrate new data into PIT’s eALP, which
was originally established in GIS. After integrating
these changes, J|D reviewed the ALP/eALP Update
and compared them to the guidance provided in AC
150/5300-16A General Guidance and Specifications
for Aeronautical Surveys, AC 150/5300-17C Standards
for Using Remote Sensing Technologies in Airport
Surveys, and AC 150/5300-18B General Guidance
and Specifications for Submission of Aeronautical
Surveys to NGS. By ensuring compliance with these
guidance documents, J|D was able to prepare an
ALP/eALP Update for FAA review and acceptance.
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 19
Federal Aviation Administration | IDIQ & PEARS
Client: Federal Aviation Administration
Dates: 2014 – Ongoing
References: Rebecca Didio
Rebecca.didio@faa.gov
(202) 267-4636
Since 2014, J|D has provided policy consulting
services to various lines of business within the
FAA. These services have included supporting
updates to policies, development of on-line training/
educational materials, facilitation of working groups,
and software development support. J|D supported
the Airports Office of Planning and Programming
(APP) by facilitating outreach and supporting the
development of the Formulation of the NPIAS and
ACIP Order (finalized in 2019). J|D's Geospatial
team leveraged proprietary web-based tools that
simplify how the FAA views and updates records
and disseminates them to the public.
J|D’s support of the development of the formulation
of the NPIAS and ACIP Order gave us insight
into how the FAA Office of Airports makes AIP
funding decisions as well as the overall process of
FAA funding from NPIAS entry to AIP grants.
This experience equips our staff to assist ASE in
maximizing FAA AIP funding potential through
well organized and documented project justifications.
training, and coordinating licensing efforts across
FAA business units
Houston Airport System | On-Call Airport Planning
Owner: City of Houston
Client: Houston Airport system
Dates: 2013 – 2020
References: Karen Korir, A.A.E.
karen.korir@houstontx.gov
(281) 233-1124
Since 2013, J|D has played a supporting role on
each of the Houston Airport System’s (HAS) three
On-Call Planning Teams. In this role, J|D performed
a number of tasks to support the development and
management of the City of Houston’s three airports,
Houston Intercontinental (IAH), Hobby (HOU)
and Ellington (EFD). Services included numerous
analyses to support the Terminal D Modernization
Program at IAH. J|D assessed opportunities and
constraints of the existing Terminal D layout in
order to orchestrate future concepts to increase the
number of wide-body parking positions. As an active
participant in the planning and consensus building,
J|D facilitated efforts to address the challenge of
expanding the Airport’s international terminal with
input from airlines, sub consultants, and airport
executives.
J|D also led the development of the AGIS submittal
and ALP update for IAH (along with partner NV5).
This included coordinating various team members
to collect AGIS compliant survey, prepare the AGIS
submittal, use that information to update the ALP
Package and integrate the new information into the
Airport’s internal GIS system. Our team was able
to design the deliverable to not only meet the ALP
requirements but also to meet AGIS and the existing
ASIS GIS requirements, thereby achieving 3 times
the value for a single project.
Other on-call assignments have included Ground
Transportation strategic planning for IAH, airfield
planning for HOU and EFD, and asset management
planning for all three airports.
Jacobsen|DanielsPitkin County | RFQ #003.22
| Page 20
Commitment to Diversity and Non-Discrimination.
J|D acknowledges and commits to observing at all times, the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d.4). J|D is a certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)
and affirms that disadvantaged enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to participate in contracting
opportunities and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in any respect
in the award of contracts or sub-contracts with J|D or our partners. Neither J|D, nor any of our partners, will
discriminate against any person or firm based on race, color, sex, or national origin in the award or performance
of this contract.
J|D is committed to providing fair and representative opportunities for minorities, women, and other disadvantaged
businesses and individuals. We understand the importance of diversity in sourcing and will strive to create and
maintain an inclusive workplace that creates opportunities for disadvantaged businesses and reflects the goals of
the FAA and Pitkin County and the diversity of the larger community in which we work and benefit.
Our team member, Project Resource Studio, is a woman-owned business and holds certifications as a Small
Business Enterprise (SBE), Diverse Business Enterprise (DBE), and Minority/Women Business Enterprise (M/
WBE). PRS will be responsible for providing a commercially useful function under any contract to be awarded
in connection with this Statement of Qualifications.
Legal Actions.
J|D hereby certifies that at no time during the past five (5) years has the company been:
•A Debtor in bankruptcy; or
•A Defendant in a lawsuit for deficient performance under a contract and the damages exceeded one
(1) million dollars
•A Respondent in an administrative action for deficient performance on a project; or
•A Defendant in any criminal action.
Insurance.
J|D has reviewed the insurance requirements provided in the draft MSA and has no concerns. If selected, J|D will
promptly produce evidence of such coverages as required by the MSA.
Exceptions.
J|D has no exceptions to anything contained in the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) or Master Service Agreement
(MSA) provided with the solicitation announcement.
Federal Regulations.
We affirm that J|D and our subcontractors are knowledgeable as to all codes, rules and regulations applicable in
the Aspen/Pitkin County jurisdiction, as well as the funding sources for the services as outlined in the RFQ. J|D
and its subcontractors will at all times comply with all such laws, codes, rules, regulations, Advisory Circulars,
and requirements now in effect and as may be amended or adopted at any time during the term of the contract.
BRADLEY T. JACOBSEN
Project Manager
Office Location: Detroit, MI
Email: brad.jacobsen@jacobsendaniels.com
Experience: 30 years
Education: Michigan State University, Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
Mr. Jacobsen is co-founder and Executive Vice President of Jacobsen|Daniels. He has nearly 30 years of experience in aviation capital
program planning and development, including extensive experience with strategic, technical, operational, and financial analyses. Mr.
Jacobsen has successfully served a number of large hub international airports as well as medium, small, general aviation, and non-hub
airports.
During his tenure serving the aviation industry, Mr. Jacobsen has served as Principal-in-Charge for wide range of airport-focused
strategy and planing engagments, including Strategic Plans, Master Plans, Land Use Plans, On-Call Planning, and Program Management
Advisor assignments. He has been instrumetnal in developing and managing successful proejcts at airoprts across the country, including
Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, Los Angeles World Airport, Chicago O’Hare and Midway International Airports,
Cleveland Hopkins International and Burke Lakefront Airports, St. Louis International Airport, Richmond International Airport, and
New Orleans International Airport among others. Mr. Jacobsen also provides senior-level leadership for numerous J|D assignments,
including: On-Call Planning for the FAA’s Office of Airports; Airline Representative operations for the O’Hare Modernization and Air
21 Programs at Chicago O’Hare International Airport; Airline Representative operations for the Philadelphia International Airport
Capacity Enhancement Program; tenant and owner representation for consolidated rental car facilities, and various poject management
assignments for commercial air carriers, including Delta Airlines, Alaska Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, and American Express.
Additionally, he also provides oversight for the firm’s Operational Services Practice area, including food and beverage concessions at
Juneau International Airport and St. Louis Lambert International Airport as well as parking and valet services at Detroit Metro,
Baltimore-Washington International Airport, and Raligh-Durham International Airport.
Mr. Jacobsen has helped clients establish and realize a vision for the successful development of airport facilities through a combination
of strategic visioning, detailed technical and financial planning and analysis, and meticulous stakeholder coordination and input.
Corenersotnes of Mr. Jacobsen’s management philosophy include: embrac communication, consensus building and stakeholder input.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
NEW ORLEANS LOUIS ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT
New Orleans, LA (2004-2014)
•ConRAC Planning and Development
•On-Call Planning
CHICAGO O’HARE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Chicago, IL (2003-Current)
•Airline Representative for O’Hare Modernization
Program
DETROIT METROPOLITAN WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT
Detroit, MI (2002-Current)
•Master Plan Update
•North Terminal Complex Redevelopment Plan
SEATTLE NEW ORLEANS INTERNATIONAL AIPORT
•Delta Airlines Skyclub Project Management
•American Express Centurion Lounge Project
Management
ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT
Aspen, CO (2017-2019)
•Procurement and Development Strategy
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORT
Los Angeles, CA (2014-Current)
•Program Management Advisory Services for Landside
Access Modernization Program (LAMP)
JACOB N. SOTSKY
Assistant Project Management
Office Location: Los Angeles, CA
Experience: 16 years
Email: jacob.sotsky@jacobsendaniels.com
Education: Tulane University, Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
University of Louisville, Masters in Business Administration
Mr. Sotsky brings vast experience in airport facility planning and implementation of capital projects. This experiecne combined with
his design-oriented background has enabled him to consistenly deliver high-quality prjoect results for clients across the nation for the
past 16 years. Part of his added value stems from his wholistic understanding of how projects function, both from a planning standpoing
as well as execution. Since 2015, he has provided program management services to Los Angeles World Airports in support of the
Landside Access Modernization Program (LAMP) at Los Angeles International Airport. This program will provide consolidated rental
car facilities, a people mover, and additional parking capacity along with improved access to and from the Airport. His efforts have
included parking demand/capacity analyses, construction phasing, and general program management practices for more than $5B in
capital projects. Over the last four years, Mr. Sotsky established and oversaw the team leading the Right-of-Way analysis for the LAMP
program in coordination with the LAWA Commercial Development Group.
Starting in 2018, Mr. Sotsky has served as deputy Project Manager for the Memphis International Airport Master Plan update and the
Master Plan udpates of both General Aviation Airports within the Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority. During this project, he
has also led the landside requirements and alternatives development.efforts. The findings from this program will be used to seismically
upgrade, modernize, and expand the Terminal Building; expand and modernize parking facilities; relocate rental car operations; and
update the airfield to align with FedEx operations.
Since 2013, Mr. Sotsky led many of the planning efforts associated with the Airport Development Plan at San Diego International
Airport. Initiativers included the concept and design of the preferred terminal scheduled to replace Terminal 1, expansion of the FIS
Facilities to accommodate current and future traffic demands, and the development of several alternatives associated with the Airport
Access Roadway. Under his leadership, the updated ALP and Exhibit A were recently approved by the FAA. Other planning efforts
completed during this time have included the Airport Development Program for the New Guayaquil International Airport (Ecuador);
aircraft plan for the new north terminal at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport; and completion of a system-wide capacity analysis for
the Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) Airport and Heliport System.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Airport Development Plan, 2013-2021
•Development of preferred terminal concept
•Management of the airport access roadway design and
programming efforts
•Managed expansion/relocation alternatives planning for
FIS Facilities
•Environmental documentation support
•Airport Layout Plan (ALP) development
LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Landside Access Modernization Program, 2015-present
•Construction phasing documentation
•Parking demand/capacity analysis, planning and
strategy
•Environmental phasing and coordination efforts
•Right-of-way support and management
•ITF-West parking garage validation and expansion study
•Enabling projects programmatic support
VINCE HAMILTON, PMP, GISP
AGIS Lead
Office Location: Montgomery, TX
Email: vince.hamilton@jacobsendaniels.com
Experience: 35 years
Education: Masters Certificate, Project Management, University of Houston
Licenses/Certifications: FAA Airport GIS Certification
Geographic Information System Professional (GISP)
Lean Six Sigma Green Belt (LSSGB)
Project Management Professional (PMP)
OSHA Safety Certification
Mr. Hamilton is a Geographical Information Technology professional skilled in complex GIS implementations including project
scoping, project planning, project management, database development, database management, data collection, data conversion, desktop
application development, systems integration, and enterprise web deployment. Mr. Hamilton has experience managing quality assurance
and control initiatives and implementing best-practice solutions across a range of disciplines.
After 18 years with HNTB as the Manager of IT and CAD, Mr. Hamilton joined Michael Baker Corporation to focus on GIS (Geographic
Information Systems), where he worked successfully with clients including HCTRA (Harris County Toll Road Authority), Energy
Transfer, and Sunoco Corp. Mr. Hamilton was actively involved with the $1.0B FEMA project using LiDAR to remap the flood plains
for the entire nation. He also managed various Mobile LiDAR projects. After 10 years with Michael Baker Corporation, Mr. Hamilton
joined Jacobs Engineering group with a focus on aviation GIS and the FAA AGIS requirements. Mr. Hamilton was the technical lead
and deputy PM for the AGIS project for HOU and EFD.
Mr. Hamilton had a vision for what the GIS system could do for the Houston Airport System (HAS) and was recruited to work directly
for the authority. During his 6 years with HAS and 2 years at the airport with Jacobs, Mr. Hamilton redeveloped and implemented the
web-based system now called OASIS. Mr. Hamilton also developed the dashboards and web services to support many different
operational departments at HAS. Those business applications address the primary revenue and expense areas common to most all airports
across the country. Mr. Hamilton was also the founder chair of the Houston Area GIS Expo. Mr. Hamilton also received the Special
Achievement in GIS award (SAG) from ESRI at the International Users group conference in San Diego, CA.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
ELLINGTON FIELD (EFD), HOUSTON, TX
HOU AGIS (2011 – 2013)
•Co-PM to monitor project status and budget using
Earned Value Analysis, scheduled staff assignments.
•Developed geoprocessing models to export existing
enterprise GIS data to FAA specifications
HOU AGIS (2013-2019)
•Provided the GIS for new Spaceport project.
FAA (FEDERAL AVIATION AUTHORITY),
WASHNINGTON, DC
HALO (2019 - Present)
•Developing a national web application to support
records management. Non-Disclosure Agreement
prevents providing details.
HOUSTON AIRPORTS (IAH), (HOU), (EFD)
Sr. GIS Project manager (2013 – 2019)
•Developed the Enterprise GIS for Houston Airports
•Integrated the Infor EAMS with GIS
•Integrated OnBase document management system w/ GIS
•Integrated airfield operations application ASOCS w/ GIS
•Integrated Safety Management System NowForce w/ GIS
•Developed import process to convert BIM models to GIS
HOUSTON HOBBY AIRPORT (HOU), HOUSTON, TX
HOU AGIS (2011 – 2013)
•Co-Project Manager, tracked project status and budget
using Earned Value Analysis, scheduled staff assignments.
•Developed geoprocessing models to export existing
enterprise GIS data to FAA specifications
KATHLEEN WANATOWICZ
Public Relations Lead
Office Location: Carbondale, CO
Email: Kathleen@prstudioco.com
Experience: 17 years
Education: Executive MBA - Daniels College of Business, University of Denver, Denver, CO
Bachelor of Arts - Florida State University
Ms. Wanatowicz is founder and principal of Project Resource Studio (PRS) and has worked in public communications and engagement
for over 17 years, with an emphasis on community development projects. With a diverse background working with issues unique to
rural areas, she provides a depth of experience in consensus building for public programs and projects. She is passionate about aligning
communities around a shared vision. Ms. Wanatowicz and her team at PRS have a proven track record in moving complex projects
forward to completion, developing long-term relationships with clients, and marketing new programs and community initiatives.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
CASTLE CREEK TRAIL, PUBLIC PROCESS AND
OUTREACH, PITKIN COUNTY OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS
Community Outreach, Communications (2018 – 2019)
•Key member of outreach and communications team
•Designed public communications materials
•Tracked public comments and planned public input
activities
ASE VISION PROJECT, ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT
Community Outreach, Communications (2018 – 2020)
•Key communications team member
•Developed materials for ASE Vision public meetings
•Facilitated Technical Working Group and other team
meetings
•Coordinated, planned, and designed engagement tools
ASPEN PEDESTRIAN MALL REDEVELOPMENT OUTREACH
Community Outreach, Communications (2016 – 2019)
•Designed community involvement plan to identify a master
plan for the redevelopment of the mall
•Facilitated multiple focus group meetings
•Key spokesperson for the project, led media relations
H. MAVIS FITZGERALD
Public Relations Support
Office Location: Carbondale, CO
Email: Mavis@prstudioco.com
Experience: 15 years
Education: MA, Education - University of Colorado at Denver;
BFA - University of Colorado at Boulder
Ms. Fitzgerald is a brand and public relations specialist with a comprehensive media relations and brand marketing background. She
has experience as a communication, marketing, sales, and senior public relations account manager and provides a strategic and creative
approach to problem-solving and execution in project communications, public outreach, and facilitation. Ms. Fitzgerald has been
aligning project goals and outcomes with the development and implementation of multifaceted marketing and communications projects
for over 15 years in the private sector and public realm.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
PITKIN COUNTY OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS, E-BIKES
ROARING FORK + COLORADO RIVER VALLEY PUBLIC
INPUT
Community Outreach, Communications (2018)
•Developed project website
•Engagement tools and plan
•Analyzed, organized public input
•Created and presented input trends, and key
recommendations
CITY OF ASPEN DOCKLESS MOBILITY OUTREACH
Community Outreach, Communications (2019)
•Developed and executed outreach methods
•Created and presented summary report and
recommendations
•Facilitated focus group meetings
•Key spokesperson for the project, led media relations
SPACE AND TRAILS TOWN TO CROWN INITIATIVE
Community Outreach, Communications (2018)
•Developed messaging initiative strategy and brand
•Ran on-ground engagement activities
•Development of community education materials and
distribution
•Coordinated efforts with strategic partners
ROBERT VANDER MEER
AGIS Support
Office Location: Sheboygan Falls, WI
Email: Mavis@prstudioco.com
Experience: 19 years
Education: BS, Civil Engineering, Michigan Technological University
Mr. Vander Meer has over 19 years of management experience in the geospatial industry. He presently serves as Vice President within
Quantum Spatial's public market sector, leading the business engagements with state, municipal, and county government agencies. He
also has a strong background in project management having demonstrated exemplary leadership, contract administration, budget
oversight, subcontract coordination, and personnel supervision on hundreds of multi-scale, simultaneous projects across the US.
Previously, Mr. Vander Meer served as the Director of Transportation Programs overseeing all transportation business development for
roads, airports, rail, and ports programs. Additionally, he has served as Director on over 700 airport projects under Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-16A, -17C, -18B guidelines. His extensive experience has been invaluable in
directing airport projects in accordance with FAA guidelines. Mr. Vander Meet has managed all internal project activities, including
overseeing that the airport ground surveys and collection of aerial imagery of the survey area are performed in accordance with the
appropriate FAA specifications.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
HARRIET ALEXANDER FIELD AIRPORT ALP MAPPING
AND AERONAUTICAL SURVEY
Vice President (2015-2016)
•Provided an ALP mapping and aeronautical obstruction
survey.
•Acquired new digital imagery of 1”=1,905 for the
obstruction surface areas and 1”=508’ of the airport.
•1”=1,905 imagery: provided planimetrics, 1 ft
orthoimages, and identification and mapping of
obstruction obstacles for all of the VG surfaces, and the
RNP approach and departure.
•1”=508 imagery: provided 100 scale mapping with 2 ft
contours of the existing airport property; identification
and mapping of obstruction obstacles for the VGRPS,
VGPCS & VGPS surfaces; and 0.5 ft orthoimages.
DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Vice President (2013-2014)
•Provided an aeronautical obstruction survey.
•Utilized newly acquired vertical stereo aerial photography
and A/T solutions.
•Produced 50 scale planimetrics and 1 ft contours of
approximately 166 acres.
•Updated existing mapping of 50 scale planimetrics and 1 ft
contours of approximately 2,907 acres.
SAN LUIS VALLEY REGIONAL BERGMAN AIRPORT (ALS)
OBSTRUCTION SURVEY
Vice President (2016-2019)
•Provided an aeronautical obstruction survey.
•Acquired new digital imagery of 1”=4,328’ for the
obstruction surface areas and 1”=801’ of the airport.
•1”=4,328’ imagery: produced planimetrics, 1 ft
orthoimages, and identification and mapping of obstruction
obstacles for all of the VG surfaces.
•1”=801’ imagery: produced 100-scale mapping with 2 ft
contours of 1,979 acres and identification and mapping of
obstruction obstacles for the VGRPS, VGPCS & VGPS
surfaces.
DAVID GRIGG, GISP
AGIS Support
Office Location: Charlotte, NC
Email: David.Grigg@nv5.com
Experience: 20 years
Education: MEERM, Masters of Earth and Environmental Resources Management
University of South Carolina, 2000
BS, Biology, Winthrop University, 1997
Certificate, FAA Integrated Distance Learning Environment (IDLE), FAA
Certifications: GISCI Certified GIS Professional #28380
Mr. Grigg manages Quantum Spatial’s aviation programs with overall responsibility for quality assurance and control of all project
deliverables. With over 20 years of relevant experience, he specializes in the delivery of geospatial technical services to airports. He has
worked with small, medium, and large hub airports to conduct assessments and build enterprise road map strategies to implement a wide
range of solutions including airspace management, document discovery, land use, noise, and property management that often require
integration with non-spatial technologies. He has completed the Level 3 FAA Airport GIS IDLE training and has prepared and uploaded
FAA Airport GIS documentation and data for electronic Airport Layout Plans (eALP) as well as other airport projects requiring
compliance with the FAA’s AGIS Program. In addition, Mr. Grigg is URISA certified GIS Professional and a member of Esri’s Airports
Industry Advisory Board.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DIVISION OF AVIATION, FAA
AGIS COMPLIANCE MAPPING AND AIRSPACE
ANALYSIS TASKS
Project Director (2016-2019)
•GIS Data Gap Analysis
•Data conversion and conflation
•FAA AGIS submission
•Orthophotography
TUCSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AERONAUTICAL
SURVEY
AGIS Support (Ongoing)
•FAA AGIS Compliance
•Planimetrics and Topography
•Orthophotography
RENO-TAHOE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ELECTRONIC
AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (EALP) & GIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION
Project Manager (2014-2019)
•Full FAA AGIS eALP dataset submission
•Enterprise GIS assessment
•Airport GIS database
•GIS web applications
MICHAEL ARNOLD
NEPA Lead
Office Location: Orlando, Florida
Email: marnold@esassoc.com
Experience: 31 years
Education: B.S., Civil Engineering, Michigan State University
Licenses/Certifications: LEED AP
Memberships: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Airports Council International – North America (ACI-NA)
American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE)
Airport Consultants Council (ACC)
Mr. Arnold has more than 30 years of aviation planning, noise, and environmental project experience at more than 130 domestic and
International airports. As an expert in project implementation strategy, he has prepared long-term development programs for more than
25 airports ranging from single runway general aviation airports to large commercial service airports. He has prepared numerous
forecasts, facility requirements analyses, project definition/justification studies, and has participated in airport/aircraft compatibility
analyses for more than 60 airports. Mr. Arnold has managed and supported more than 40 airport noise and land use related studies, and
has led a number of complex and often controversial environmental studies for a wide range of projects including new runways, new
terminal configurations and major airfield reconfigurations.
He is an active leader in aviation industry groups and regularly moderates, speaks, and facilitates discussions on a wide variety of
industry issues including sustainability/“green airports”, land use compatibility, forecasting, emerging issues in noise and 14 CFR Part
150 studies, integration of planning and environmental processes, and the changing needs of airport planning..
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
MELBOURNE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, MELBOURNE, FL
Aviation Related Development Environmental Assessments, 2020
•Project Director for NEPA compliance for more than 20
projects including aircraft manufacturing, research,
maintenance repair and overhaul (MRO) and terminal
expansion at one of the fastest growing airports in the US.
ST. PETE-CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, ST.
PETERSBURG, FL.
Airco Redevelopment EA, 2020
•Project Director for the 130 acre redevelopment of the
former AIRCO golf course to include both aviation and non-
aviation related development.
LAKELAND LINDER REGIONAL AIRPORT, LAKELAND, FL.
Various Projects, 2021
•Project Director for a series of projects at Lakeland Linder
Regional Airport (LAL) including NEPA compliance for an ILS
relocation, new CAT II and CAT III Instrument landing systems,
a new ATCT EA, a new FBO and new MRO/Cargo facilities
(Amazon).
ORLANDO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, ORLANDO, FL
East Airfield Environmental Assessment, 2016
•Project Director for this complex 1300+ acre project
which included more than 178 acres of wetland impacts.
JOHN F. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND
LAGUARDIA AIRPORT, NEW YORK CITY, NY
14 CFR Part 150 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Studies,
Early 2022
•Project Director overseeing the largest combined Part
150 effort ever undertaken in the US.
CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,
LOCATION
New Runway Improvement Program Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS), 2019
•Task leader supporting noise, socioeconomic impacts,
Environmental Justice, project planning and overall
project strategy.
AUTUMN WARD, CM, ENV SP
NEPA Support
Office Location: Tampa, Florida
Email: award@esassoc.com
Experience: 18 years
Education: B.S., Aviation Business Administration, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
M.S., Aeronautics, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
Licenses/Certifications: Certified Member, American Association of Airport Executives
EnvisionTM Sustainability Professional and Verifier
Memberships: Secretary and Board Member, Tony Jannus Distinguished Aviation Society
Autumn has more than 15 years of experience in the aviation field. She has a strong background in environmental planning, airport
facility planning, noise analysis, sustainability planning, and aviation safety. Her project experience includes facilities ranging in size
from small general aviation airports to major large-hub air carrier airports in the United States and abroad. She is experienced with the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and airport certification requirements and skilled in documenting and presenting the results of
technical analyses in a manner that can be clearly understood by the public. Autumn is also an expert in public outreach techniques that
maximize public participation under challnging conditions including in-person, virtual and hybrid strategies. She spoke in both 2020
and 2021 as a panelist on multiple session for ACI on Virtual and Hybrid approaches to public outreach. She also served as a panelist
in 2021 on Accelerating Projects under NEPA at the ACC/AAAE Symposium.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
BISHOP AIRPORT, BISHOP, CA
New Airline Service Environmental Assessment, 2021
•Project Director, providing guidance and oversight
throughout the NEPA evaluation process, providing quality
assurance / quality control of the Environmental Assessment
and associated technical reports, and participating in public
outreach activities.
NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, NAPLES, FL
Master Plan Update, 2020
•Led the analysis of Airport’s waste and recycling practices for
the RRWRP, as well as the sustainability component of the
Master Plan.
ACRP 02-69, WASHINGTON, DC
Integrating Airport Sustainability and the NEPA Process, 2019
•Led ESA support on this project which included assisting with
the research and documentation of the environmental review
process and strategies for integrating environmental
considerations into airport planning, development, and
operations.
SNOHOMISH COUNTY AIRPORT/PAINE FIELD,
EVERETT, WA
New Airline Service Supplemental Environmental
Assessment, 2019
•Project Manager overseeing preparation of a
Supplemental EA for Alaska and United Airlines, in order
to initiate air carrier service at Paine Field.
JOHN F. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND
LAGUARDIA AIRPORT, NEW YORK CITY, NY
14 CFR Part 150 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Studies,
Early 2022
•Project Manager responsible for leading the
documentation effort as well as responding to public
comments on the studies.
SAN BERNARDINO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, SAN
BERNARDINO, CA
Environmental Assessment, Eastgate Air Cargo Facility, 2020
•Project Manager that oversaw the development of the
EA and comment response process. Worked extensively
with FAA regional and headquarter’ s legal staff in
successfully defending the EA technical analysis during
litigation.
BOB JONES, P.E.
Planning & Engineering Lead
Office Location: Aspen, CO
Email: bob.jones@kimley-horn.com
Experience: 37 years
Education: Master of Science, Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of Washington
Licenses/Certifications: Professional Engineer in Colorado, Alaska, California, West Virginia, Virginia,
and Wyoming
Memberships: American Society of Civil Engineers, Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association
Bob has 37 years of planning, design, and construction experience at large and small airports across the nation. He manages Kimley-
Horn’s Denver aviation practice and oversees its planning, design, and construction projects. Bob develops clear, thorough
communication through all project phases and understands the benefits of coordination and planning on project schedules, budgets, and
impacts to normal operation. He consistently delivers projects of exceptional quality with the fewest operational impacts by using
innovative construction methods, materials, and phasing plans. Bob is also a subject matter expert on FAA airfield and design standards.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
SPANISH PEAKS AIRFIELD, AIRPORT CONSULTING
SERVICES
Project Manager (2008 – 2019)
•Project manager for numerous planning and engineering
projects including:
o Pavement rehabilitation/seal coat
o West connector taxiways, ramp expansion, and airport
beacon
o Access road and power line
o Wildlife fence
o Runway reconstruction
o Fuel facility relocation and apron expansion
o Airport master plan
HUNTINGTON TRI-STATE AIRPORT FIVE-YEAR AIRPORT,
ENVIRONMENTAL, AND PLANNING ON-CALL SERVICES
Principal in Charge (2011 – 2021)
•Led programming and construction of several projects with
minimal interruption to normal air carrier and cargo
operations:
o Runway rehabilitation
o Rehabilitation of airline, cargo, and general aviation
aprons
o Taxiway G reconstruction
o Taxiway A rehabilitation
o Sign and marking improvements
o Drainage improvements
o Slide repairs
o Electrical repairs and improvements
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT
Project Engineer (2017 – Present)
•Leading multi-year engagement to assist client with all
facets of operation and capital programming
•Active technical support for ASE Vision process with the
community
•Providing continuous support on airport civil projects,
some of an emergency nature – to help the Airport
continue operating.
DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LANDSIDE ON-
CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
Project Manager (2009 – 2016)
•Provided client coordination
•Supervised design and construction services for:
o New and rehabilitated roadways
o New and rehabilitated parking lots
o Drainage studies
o Water quality and stormwater permitting
o Drainage infrastructure
o Bridge repair
o Transportation engineering
TOM SCHNETZER
Planning & Engineering Support
Office Location: St. Paul, MN
Email: tom.schnetzer@kimley-horn.com
Experience: 34 years
Education: Bachelor of Urban Planning, University of Cincinnati
Mr. Schnetzer has 34 years of experience in airport consulting, serving as a trusted advisor to senior airport executives at airports of all
sizes. He specializes in master planning, terminal/landside planning and programming, strategic planning, financial feasibility analyses,
and capital program implementation. Mr. Schnetzer has led the preparation of 37 master plans, including four in the past five years. He
recently co-authored the new FAA AC 150/5360-13A, Airport Terminal Planning and ACRP Report 150, NextGEN For Airports,
Airport Planning and Development. Prior to joining Kimley-Horn, he led the master planning practice for LeighFisher, serving as Project
Principal for the Houston Airport System Planning On-Call contract and the San Diego International Airport Airport Development
Program (master plan).
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
PROFESSIONAL AIRPORT PLANNING SERVICES AIRPORT
MASTER PLAN, LOUISVILLE MUHAMMAD ALI
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Project Manager (2018 – present)
•Led a large team to prepare a new Master Plan for this major
air cargo airport
•Directly involved in the planning, coordination, public
outreach and stakeholder facilitation, aviation forecasts,
airfield analysis and conceptual design, and landside analysis
and conceptual design
•Planning focused on maximizing efficiency of the airfield to
facilitate cargo and other flight operations
•Developed plan to simplify access roadways to maximize
customer experience
•Microsimulation of airfield operations to identify benefits of
infrastructure changes
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT
Project Planner (2018 – Present)
•Responsible for planning elements and general technical
support of the Pitkin County ASE Vision process
• Led “right-sizing” effort for planning of the terminal
building as well as forecasting efforts to support it
•Provided technical support for the “Airport Experience”
Committee of the ASE Vision process
•Providing ongoing strategic planning and tactical support
for airport management
MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT SAFETY
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
Project Planner (2020 - present)
•Leading programming for a new terminal campus that
will replace the existing terminal campus
•Moving a simple master plan concept to implementation
•Directing efforts to handle simple “pen and ink” changes
to the ALP to allow projects to move forward and
become eligible for Federal funding
121 Pearl Street, Ypsilanti, MI 48197 | Tel. 734 961 3200 | JacobsenDaniels.com 1
November 30, 2021
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
0233 E. Airport Rd. - Suite A
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Template Contract Revisions
Airport layout Plan Update for Aspen/Pitkin County Airport (ASE)
Dear Sir or Ma’am;
Jacobsen Daniels LLC (J|D) has had an opportunity to review the Master Service Agreement
(MSA) supplied with RFQ No. 003.22 – Airport Layout Plan Update for Aspen/Pitkin County
Airport. We have no exceptions to the proposed form of agreement and if selected, J|D commits
to quickly executing a Master Service Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners of
Pitkin County.
Respectfully,
Bradley T. Jacobsen
Executive Vice President, Partner
121 Pearl St, Ypsilanti, MI 48197
Office: (734) 961-3200 | Mobile: (734) 730-3345
brad.jacobsen@jacobsendaniels.com
2022 2023 2024
Managing Partner $ 360 $ 378 $ 397
Vice President $ 325 $ 341 $ 358
Director $ 300 $ 315 $ 331
Managing Consultant $ 275 $ 289 $ 303
Senior Consultant $ 225 $ 236 $ 248
Consultant $ 175 $ 184 $ 193
Analyst/Technical Assistant $ 150 $ 158 $ 165
Administrative Support $ 125 $ 131 $ 138
J|D Billing Rates
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 2E6D2E58E8694EB2905E87CA96B00AF6 Status: Completed
Subject: Jacobsen | Daniels, LLC | Pitkin County Master Services Agreement 003.22 for Review and Signature
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 106 Signatures: 6 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 6 Initials: 0 Pitkin County Procurement
AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Disabled
Time Zone: (UTC-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)
530 East Main Street
Suite 203
Aspen, CO 81611
Procurement@PitkinCounty.com
IP Address: 216.147.121.0
Record Tracking
Status: Original
4/4/2022 10:28:58 AM
Holder: Pitkin County Procurement
Procurement@PitkinCounty.com
Location: DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Dan Bartholomew
dan.bartholomew@aspenairport.com
Airport Director
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Signed by link sent to
dan.bartholomew@aspenairport.com
Using IP Address: 65.38.144.66
Sent: 4/4/2022 10:54:18 AM
Viewed: 4/4/2022 10:54:40 AM
Signed: 4/4/2022 10:55:04 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Brad Jacobsen
brad.jacobsen@jacobsendaniels.com
Executive Vice President
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Signed by link sent to
brad.jacobsen@jacobsendaniels.com
Using IP Address: 147.92.107.252
Sent: 4/4/2022 10:55:09 AM
Viewed: 4/4/2022 1:30:27 PM
Signed: 4/6/2022 3:10:11 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 4/4/2022 1:30:27 PM
ID: 77d74145-4854-4803-b1ec-800580bc02bd
Company Name: Pitkin County, Colorado
Richard Neiley
richard.neiley@pitkincounty.com
Asst. County Attorney
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)Signature Adoption: Drawn on Device
Signed by link sent to
richard.neiley@pitkincounty.com
Using IP Address: 73.78.158.155
Sent: 4/6/2022 3:10:17 PM
Viewed: 4/11/2022 11:00:45 AM
Signed: 4/11/2022 11:01:07 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 4/11/2022 11:00:45 AM
ID: b8434723-4fae-4fd9-89f7-15ba6337c160
Company Name: Pitkin County, Colorado
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Rich Englehart
rich.englehart@pitkincounty.com
Deputy County Manager
Pitkin County
Signing Group: County Manager Group
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Signed by link sent to
rich.englehart@pitkincounty.com
Using IP Address: 65.38.144.66
Sent: 4/11/2022 11:01:13 AM
Viewed: 4/11/2022 11:18:16 AM
Signed: 4/11/2022 11:19:02 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Pitkin County Procurement
procurement@pitkincounty.com
Procurement Specialist
Pitkin County
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 4/11/2022 11:19:08 AM
Resent: 4/11/2022 11:19:14 AM
Viewed: 4/11/2022 11:23:24 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Accounts Payable
AP@pitkincounty.com
Accounts Payable
Pitkin County
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 4/11/2022 11:19:08 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Evelyn Cruz
evelyn.cruz@aspenairport.com
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 4/11/2022 11:19:09 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 4/12/2021 2:10:41 PM
ID: c1bc55da-6ec1-49bb-8432-a0d7de7ce362
Company Name: Pitkin County, Colorado
Dan Bartholomew
dan.bartholomew@aspenairport.com
Airport Director
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 4/11/2022 11:19:09 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 4/4/2022 10:54:19 AM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 4/11/2022 11:18:16 AM
Signing Complete Security Checked 4/11/2022 11:19:02 AM
Completed Security Checked 4/11/2022 11:19:09 AM
Payment Events Status Timestamps
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE DISCLOSURE
From time to time, Pitkin County (we, us or Pitkin County) may be required by law to provide
you with certain written notices or disclosures. Described below are the terms and conditions for
providing to you such notices and disclosures electronically when we send you documents for
electronic signature.
Acknowledging your Access, Intent, and Consent to Receive and Sign Materials
Electronically
To confirm that you can access this information electronically, which will be similar to other
electronic notices and disclosures that we will provide to you, please verify that you were able to
read this electronic disclosure and that you also were able to print on paper or electronically save
this page for your future reference and access or that you were able to e-mail this disclosure and
consent to an address where you will be able to print on paper or save it for your future reference
and access. Further, if you consent to receive notices and disclosures exclusively in electronic
format on the terms and conditions described above, please let us know by clicking the 'I agree'
button below.
By checking the 'I Agree' box, I confirm that:
I am establishing my intent to be bound to the transaction, and indicating that I am fully
aware of the purpose for which the signature is being provided.
I can access and read this Electronic CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC RECEIPT OF
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE DISCLOSURES document; and
I can print on paper the disclosure or save or send the disclosure to a place where I can
print it, for future reference and access; and
Until or unless I notify Pitkin County as described above, I consent to receive from
exclusively through electronic means all notices, disclosures, authorizations,
acknowledgments, and other documents that are required to be provided or made
available to me by Pitkin County during the course of my relationship with you.
Signing Documents without a Pitkin County DocuSign Account:
Pitkin County may not require all document signers to be authorized users of the Pitkin County
DocuSign Account. Please read the information below carefully and thoroughly, and if you can
access this information electronically to your satisfaction and agree to these terms and
conditions, please confirm your agreement by clicking the 'I agree' button at the bottom of this
document. When you don't have a DocuSign account, you will be provided the opportunity to
agree to the Legal Disclosure each time you open an "envelope" for signing, at this time, you can
download and retain this disclosure. Pitkin County will forward completed documents that
you've reviewed, processed or signed via email. Should you require copies of these signed
documents (e.g., if they get deleted from your email account) you should request those
documents from Pitkin County under the Colorado Open Records Act by contacting the Pitkin
County custodian who sent you the document for signature.
Signing Documents with a Pitkin County DocuSign Account:
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure created on: 3/20/2020 3:28:13 PM
Parties agreed to: Brad Jacobsen, Richard Neiley, Evelyn Cruz
Please read the information below carefully and thoroughly, and if you can access this
information electronically to your satisfaction and agree to these terms and conditions, please
confirm your agreement by clicking the 'I agree' button at the bottom of this document.
Getting paper or electronic copies
At any time, you may request from us a paper or electronic copy of any record provided or made
available electronically to you by us. For such copies, as long as you are an authorized user of
the DocuSign system you will have the ability to download and print any documents we send to
you through your DocuSign user account for a limited period of time (usually 30 days) after such
documents are first sent to you. After such time, if you wish for us to send you paper or
electronic copies of any such documents from our office to you, you may be charged a per-page
fee. You may request delivery of such paper or electronic copies from us by following the
procedure described below.
Withdrawing your consent
If you are an authorized DocuSign Account holder, you can decide to receive notices and
disclosures from us electronically, you may at any time change your mind and tell us that
thereafter you want to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format. Described
below is the process for informing us of your decision to receive future notices and disclosure in
paper format and also how to withdraw your consent to receive notices and disclosures
electronically.
Consequences of changing your mind
If you elect to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format, it will slow the
speed at which we can complete certain steps in transactions with you and delivering services to
you because we will need first to send the required notices or disclosures to you in paper format,
and then wait until we receive back from you your acknowledgment of your receipt of such
paper notices or disclosures. To indicate to us that you are changing your mind, you must
withdraw your consent using the DocuSign 'Withdraw Consent' form on the signing page of your
DocuSign account. This will indicate to us that you have withdrawn your consent to receive
required notices and disclosures electronically from us and you will no longer be able to use your
DocuSign user account to receive required notices and consents electronically from us or to sign
electronically documents from us.
All notices and disclosures will be sent to you electronically
Unless you tell us otherwise in accordance with the procedures described herein, we will provide
electronically to you through your DocuSign user account all required notices, disclosures,
authorizations, acknowledgments, and other documents that are required to be provided or made
available to you during the course of our relationship with you. To reduce the chance of you
inadvertently not receiving any notice or disclosure, we prefer to provide all of the required
notices and disclosures to you by the same method and to the same address that you have given
us. Thus, you can receive all the disclosures and notices electronically or in paper format through
the paper mail delivery system. If you do not agree with this process, please let us know as
described below. Please also see the paragraph immediately above that describes the
consequences of your electing not to receive delivery of the notices and disclosures
electronically from us.
How to contact Pitkin County:
You may contact us to let us know of your changes as to how we may contact you electronically,
to request paper copies of certain information from us, and to withdraw your prior consent to
receive notices and disclosures electronically as follows:
To contact us by email send messages to Helpdesk@provelocity.com
To advise Pitkin County of your new e-mail address
To let us know of a change in your e-mail address where we should send notices and disclosures
electronically to you, you must send an email message to us at Helpdesk@provelocity.com and
in the body of such request you must state: your previous e-mail address, your new e-mail
address .
In addition, you must notify DocuSign, Inc to arrange for your new email address to be reflected
in your DocuSign account by following the process for changing e-mail in DocuSign.
To request paper or electronic copies from Pitkin County
To request delivery from us of paper or electronic copies of the notices and disclosures
previously provided by us to you electronically, you should request those documents from Pitkin
County under the Colorado Open Records Act by contacting the Pitkin County custodian who
sent you the document for signature.
To withdraw your consent with Pitkin County
To inform us that you no longer want to receive future notices and disclosures in electronic
format you may:
i. decline to sign a document from within your DocuSign account, and on the subsequent
page, select the check-box indicating you wish to withdraw your consent, or you may;
ii. send us an e-mail to Helpdesk@provelocity.com and in the body of such a request, you
must state your e-mail, full name, Postal Address, telephone number, and account
number.