HomeMy WebLinkAboutSmuggler Superfund - Clement Assoc Prelim Risk Assessmt 1985TOM DUNLOP
ASPEN/PITKIN
SAWITAMAN
130 & GALENA
ASM CO, 81 W I
nnU
Clement Associates, Inc.
A Scientific & Engineering Consulting Firm,
Arlington, Virginia
PRELIMINARY RISS{ ASSESSMENT FOR
THE SMUGGLER K)UN`I"AIN SITE, PITKIN
COUNTY, COLORADO
Prepared for:
Scott Mernit
Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc®
Denver, Colorado
3 - -
Clement Associates, Inc.
1515 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, Virginia 22209
May 10, 1985
Pa
Summary and Conclusions
1
Characterization and Description of the Site
5
A. Geographic and Physical Description
5
B. Procedures Used in Sampling and Analysis
8
C. Results of Sampling and Analysis
10
1. Soil and Mine Tailings
10
2. Surface Water
12
3. Groundwater
15
4. Air
17
5. Blood Levels
18
D. Summary of Results
21
Hazard Assessment
22
A. Health Effects
22
1. Arsenic
21
2. Barium
23
3. Cadmium
23
4. Copper
24
5. Lead
25
6. Manganese
25
7. Mercury
26
8. zinc
27
B. Toxicity to Wildlife
27
IV. Exposure and 'Risk Assessment
30
A. introduction
30
B. Potential Exposure Pathways
30
1. Soil
30
2. Household Dust
32
3. Surface Water
33
4. Groundwater
34
5. Air
34
6. Summary
34
C
Lead.
35
Cao
Cadmium
41
1. Inhalation
41
2. Ingestion of Dirt
41
3. Ingestion of Vegetables Grown in
42
Contaminated Soil
4. Ingestion of Groundwater
42
E.
Other Elements
44
F.
Interactions
45
V. Mitigating Factors
47
A.
Bioavailability (Physical -chemical
47
characteristics)
B.
Meteorological Factors
so
VI. Recommendations for Further Investigation
51
A.
Exposure Assessment
51
1. soil
51
2. Household Dust
52
3. Surface Water
52
4. Groundwater
53
5. Air
53
6. Identification of Exposed Population
53
B.
Risk Assessment
54
References
4-77)IJ
This report is a preliminary assessment of human health
risks and potential environmental impairment associated with
the presence of mining wastes in the vicinity of Smuggler Mountain
near Aspen in Pitkin County, Colorado® The adequacy of avail-
able information for risk assessment is evaluated and needs for
additional information are identified. The available evidence
is used to assess whether or not unacceptable health risks
may exist for workers at the site and for residents of homes
on or in the vicinity of the site. Sources of uncertainty
in the risk assessment are identified and discussed. This
report consists of a brief description of the site, a summary
of the results of environmental monitoring in the vicinity,
a discussion of the inherent, hazards associated with exposure
to metals at the site, an assessment of potential human health
risks to residents in the vicinity of the site, a discussion
of sources of uncertainty in the risk assessment, and recommen-
dations for further investigation at the site.
on the basis of available information, Clement Associates,
Inc., has reached the following conclusions:
1. T'he most important potential routes of human exposure
to metals at the Smuggler Mountain site are:
• ingestion of contaminated soil
• Ingestion of vegetables grown in contaminated soil
• inhalation of airborne particulates (soil)
e Ingestion and inhalation of household dusit
a Ingestion of contaminated groundwater.
2. Because of their inherent toxicity, health risks
due to exposure to lead, cadmium, and possibly arsenic dominate
the risk assessment.
3. Because of their potential to experience greater
exposure and because of their increased susceptibility to the
adverse effects of lead, children aged 2-12 are considered
to be the target population • concern at the Smuggler Mountain
site.
1, . Levels ♦ le,ad of 1,001 ppm, or higher in soil i&
the vicinity of the Smuggler Mountain site may pose an unacceptable
risk of central nervous system impairment in children living
in the vicinity of the site.
5. Levels of cadmiumn of 10 ppm or higher in soil in
the vicinity of the Smuggler Mountain site may pose unacceptable
risks of cancer and impaired kidney function among residents
in the vicinity of the site.
6. Because of a lack of complete information regarding
exposure, there is a great deal of uncertainty associated with
the estimated risks that may result from exposure to metals
at the Smuggler Mountain site.
1 7. In order to reduce the large uncertainty associated
with the present risk estimates Clement recommends further
investigations as follows:
I
e Additional surface soil sampling and analysi�
ately define a 1,000 ppm isopleth for lead and a 10
ppm isopleth for cadmium.
Ascertainment of prevailing meterological conditions
at the site
Additional air sampling and analyses to determine worst
case and annual average levels of respirable particulates,
lead, cadmium, and arsenic at locations most likely
* Investigations of the potential bioavailability of
lead and cadmium in soil and tailings from the Smuggler
Mountain site.,
e Sampling and analysis of household dust samples from
residences adjacent to the site for lead, cadmium,
and arsenic.
e Further characterization of the nature and drainage
pattern of surface water at the site.
e Further characterization of groundwater movement at
the site.
e Additional groundwater monitoring with methods suffi-
ciently sensitive to detect hazardous levels of lead,
cadmium, and arsenic.
e Collection of additional information regarding the
potentially exposed population including the location
of wells that have the potential to supply water for
domestic use.
9 Measurement • blood lead levels or another suitable
indicator of lead body burdens in individuals, especil
ally children, who have lived in the vicinity of the
site .
The results of these further investigations can be used
to assess current risks with greater certainty as well as to
assess the risks associated with potential remedial options.
51
II. CHARACTERIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE
A. Geographic and Physical Descr�timon
The Smuggler Mountain site is an approximately 75 -acre
area located about I mile northeast of downtown Aspen, Colorado
in Pitkin County (Figure 1). Much of the site is located on
the side of Smuggler Mountain, with the terrain consisting of
a steep slope leading down to several plateaus and eventually
to the Roaring Fork River. The Smuggler mine shaft is situated
on the side of the mountain just above the highest plateau.
The Smuggler Mountain Trailer Court is located a few hundred
yards downhill from the mine to the west and the Hunter-Longhouse
Condominiums and the Centennial development are at about the
same distance to the northwest. The Centennial development
consists of low priced condominiums which when completed, will
be available to people with over 3 years residency in Pitkin
County. Centennial is also putting in a baseball field on a
plateau between the trailer park and the mine property (Mernitz,
personal communication)
Mountain tailings, either uncovered, covered, or mixed with
soil, comprise much of the Smuggler Mountain Site (Ford et al.
1984). These mine tailings were used as fill in several local
construction projects, including the trailer park, the Hunter-
Longhouse Condominiums, and the Silver King Condominiums. Most..
of the tailing piles have been covered with imported topsoil
but some bare tailings are still present (Boon 1983). The mine
61
�a .sem` 4\ +a,y abti�6J®� •Y°�� ..
m « '°�.° e • p i 8; -� '$` me� ® •a' a a `" .g a.. aa� * m �4w ' �' • �°. � � m y'x""°..
O'.t 4b•
tltN a" r
�a
tj
®.CD
��
/
h 0 �t
0 � ,h
e
7907)
h IT
my, m P D o MW ! I
b � � J ' •fir. m ® 4\ "•v.n..Y..• I� � �F .
b XPi'
m p 1d
hl40(f/rY +
� /Y ,rap � ��b Y�(® +1 A�..�lis � �
«rho ...ffftae� fir .� m �� �
�JL-8—�p� 6r
071
�f.r JY'®•m'm Y1'��� "''•m
10
w '®^ m ri m m• e
/p 0' w
{
.)fig p
4� a
•mm w Olt ��6'&%'onrnent, Inc_
l
vel ,r'°• �� b �11i1SUITE 35,
1! I�� 4105 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE,
)'► 11 ° Pria DENVER, COLORADO
X4'4.'• � � 11 r "
I u t a FIGURE
STUDY AREA LOCATION
ASPEN9 COLORADO
�. 1.
rIgA4
tailings contain very high levels of lead, cadmium, and other
toxic metals, which may present a significant hazard to exposed
populations.
The geology in the area of the Smuggler site consists
of faulted quartz bedrock overlain with glacial, colluvial,
and alluvial deposits (Ford et al. 1984). Limestone, dolomite,
sandstone, and shale are important constituents of the soil
in the area of the site. The limestone is especially important
due to its buffering capacity; acidic mine runoff with an initial
pH of 5, has a neutral pH of 7 when it is measured at the river.
The hydrologic makeup of the Smuggler site consists pri-
marily of the Roaring Fork River which has an average annual
discharge of 84 cubic feet per second (cfs) and flows in a
northeasterly direction, and groundwater flow. Hunter Creek
to the north of the site may also receive some runoff from
the site.
The interaction between groundwater and surface water is
affected by the presence of several mine shafts (Ford et al.
1984). In particular, groundwater to surface water flow occurs
at the Mollie Gibson Mine to the south of Smuggler Mine and
at the Cowenhoven Tunnel to the northwest. As groundwater
probably flows in a westerly or northwesterly direction, the
Cowenhoven Tunnel which discharges into Hunter Creek, is probably
the most important with respect to the site. However, drainage
from the Mollie Gibson Mine may transport mine tailings present
on the soil surface into the Roaring Fork River.
7
Groundwater is present in both the unconsolidated valley -
fill sediments and in the bedrock (Ford et al. 1984) . In the
valley fill sediments, it probably moves downslope towards,
stream channels with some disruption in flow direction because
of changes in sedimentary layers and with the rate of flow
dependent on soil composition. in the bedrock, water probably
travels through the intergranular spaces in the rock matrix
and through the fissures and faults in the bedrock. Groundwater
in the bedrock probably moves most easily in the direction
of the fault line, which is primarily a northeast -southwest
direction.
Surface water flow may transport materials from the site
by several routes. The removal of surface sediments by the
drainage from mine shafts and the transportion of leachate
in groundwater recharge of surface streams, are two pathways.
In addition, spring runoff and runoff after heavy rains, either
of which could wash across the site and transport soil downslope
to the trailer park or into the river, may also have an effect
at the site.
The vegetation on the site is rather sparse and apparently
consists of scrub trees and grasses.
I
B Procedures Used in Sam lin and Analj,�Js
All media have been sampled for the presence of at least
some of the toxic metals known to be contained in mine tailings.
Soil and tailings were sampled separately and analyzed using
both weak acid extraction and total acid digestion (Ford et al.
N
1984) . Several samples analyzed by the Colorado Department
of Health were apparently also extracted by total acid digestion.
Boon (1983) used an ammonium biocarbonate DTPA (AB -DTPA) extrac-
tion.
Only
, a small number of groundwater samples were taken.
These were apparently taken from the wells of several residents
near the site. Discussion with Aspen -Pitkin County Environ-
mental Health Department officials indicates that the samples
were taken from the tap, but no information was available as
to whether or nor the system was flushed prior to sample collec-
tion. Surface waters near the Smuggler Mine site have also
undergone limited sampling®
Ecology and Environment inc. (1985) conducted fairly exten-
sive monitoring of the air around the site in the early autumn
of 1984® High volume air samplers were placed around the site
and at a background location near Snow Mass Village. Total
suspended particulates and total metal concentrations were
measured. In addition, one sampler was used to measure respir-
able particulates and metals (less than 10 � in size). Air
sampling was conducted at a time when construction was in pro-
gress on the Centennial site, but the expected increase in
particulate emissions may have been mitigated by unusually
rainy conditions.
An informal screening study involving 22 persons who lived
in the vicinity of Smuggler Mountain was conducted in an effort
to detect elevated body burdens of lead. T,he details of this
I
investigation are not available. Apparently a drop-in blood
sampling station was set up in conjunction with a local fair
(Tom Dunlop, personal communication). Pin -prick blood samples
were taken from volunteers and analyzed for zinc protoporphyrin
(ZPP). ZPP is an indirect measure of lead intoxication (USEPA
1984c). Elevated ZPP results from the accumulation of erythro-
cyte protoporphyrin IX when lead interferes with hemoglobin
synthesis. Body burdens of lead must reach a critical level
before interference with heme synthesis occurs and this level
may be higher than the level, at which there is subclinical
neurologic impairment® Therefdre, elevated ZPP levels are
useful only for detecting relatively severe lead intoxication
and would not be expected to reflect modest increases in blood
levels corresponding to subclinical intoxication®
C. Results of Sampling and Analysis
1. Soil and Mine Tailip_qs
A total of 11 metals were detected in the soil and mine
tailings at the Smuggler Mountain site (Ford et al. 1984).
The number of samples, average concentrations, and maximum
concentrations for the detected metals are presented in Table 1.
The concentrations reported are for extraction by total acid
digestion. Arsenic, cadmium, copper, mercury, and zinc were
detected at levels that averaged about 10 times higher than
average background levels of these metals in undistrubed soils
in the U.S., and lead was detected at an average level about
200 times higher than average background levels (Connor and
M
kn
a
m
C3
Ca0
4
C�l
0
0
C:,
Lrl
7!
In
C,
13
ko
CD
kn
0
0
"1
10
9J
MN
a
V
4
C3
-I
W94
N
Ln
C)
14
0
to
en
Ct
Ua
C4
M
CA
4
6d'1C3
C3
N0
W
a
O
r4
N
0
m
�T
14
C)
14
rn
pl
C
c
I
ko
Ln
C:
fi
0
L)
=-I
U) 11
cq
rl
ea C
Ck
rz
n
C2
Ln
h
'A
CN
CD
a
C3
E!
cc
N.
co
-4
rn
a
C3
r -
fu
Y4
r3
ra
rd
CA
m
co
ko
r'
co
0
o
a
CD
19
-W
-4
0
CN
0
N
rn
�
va
(U
rn
C�
co
N
ro
c
air
to
M 0
W
'D
W
,,
�o
--
�o
1�
10
1�
�Q
1,
W
�,
lg
60
G9
4A'
'D
to
'D
la
Q
6p
6D
:3 5
z z
E
I 4
x
rtg
Ul
ry
cO
rq
%a
r7
en
0
ID
a;
CD
0
0
a
IPB
mwc,4
MOW
-T
-4c"
w
0
w
rn
LI;
rM
Cfi
aj L1
C
i9
CI
to
Q) ul
m
41
m
M
M
M
4
en
en
en
,-n
M
-�e
u
-4
r4
4
-4
-4
-4
r4
4
u
a
-4
..1
4
-4
W d)
'0 -0
>
0 ai
E E
4
0
z
x
C
x
tn
C:)
2
C,
Cr
Aj
d)
w
41 0
m
ax
E
En
ri
4b
x
v,
u
tri
N
Shacklette 1975) a Barium levels in soil were slightly higher
than average but concentrations of barium in the tailings were
less than background levels. Four compounds, chromium, iron,
manganese, and vanadium were present in the soil and tailings
within expected background limits.
The data of Boon (1933) are presented in Table I -A® No
background levels were presented and concentrations obtained
using the ammonium biocarbonate DPTA (AB-DPTA) extraction pro-
cedure are not comparable with total acid extracted levels,
but the trend in relative concentrations of the metals as seen
in the Ford et al. (1984) data was maintained. Boon (1983)
did calculate total lead concentrations based on the correlation
between the A13-QPTA and the to5tal acid extraction procedures
and this value is included in Table 1-A. However, he sampled
a wider area than Ford et al. (1984) and did not separate soil
samples from tailing samples and for that reason the data were
not combined.
Three samples were collected at the Smuggler Trailer Park
by the Pitkin County Environmental Health Department and analyzed
for lead and cadmium (CDH 1982) ® The average and maximum con-
centrations reported were 90 and 223 mg/kg for cadmium and
11,723 and 21,700 mg/kg for lead. It was not clear whether
these samples were of soil or tailings.
2. Surface Water
Table 2 presents mean and maximum concentrations of dis-
solved metals in the Roaring Fork River upstream and downstream
12
CONCENTRATIONS OF HEAVY METALS IN SOIL AND MINE TAILINGS
IN THE VICINITY OF THE SMUGGLER MOUNTAIN SITE
(AB-DPTA Analysis; mg/kg)
Number Detected/
Number of Samples Mean Maximum
Cadmium
27%27
5.4
35.8
Copper
27/27
12..3
37.5
Iron
27/27
30.7
8
Lead
27/2.7
292.4a
849
Manganese
27/27
4.7
16.8
Zinc
27/2.7
318.2
2,078
aCorrelates with a total
acid extraction value
for lead of
1,162 mg/kg.
SOURCE: Boon
(1983)
13
E-
1-4
4J
-4
P
Z;
1-4 E-4
z
C14
EA
E-4
>4
>
ry4
0 E--4
r14
0
0
EA
E-4
Iz
E-4
Iz
z >
0
U
W
4J
ul
0
-4
�4
8
94
ra
c
=3
0
w
ol
E.:
4.)
U)
0
0
P4
se
M
U)
ra ff�
4) Cu
a) U)
0
Iz z
-4
x
co
r
En
ro
ra
4.)
(U 44
0
r- 0) CN Iry
J
r- ca �
CD ra
cq N N Cq
C:) C14 C) (n a CD C) C) C�4
co cyl tD
C14
U) �o
r -
r -4
Li
(N
C\l
C14
cq
CD
0
C)
N
C)
'N
N
r-4
CD
C14
CD
cq
ctrl
a)
.,4
�l
00
ON
r-4
0
(0
Ln
41
41
6
0
(D
(0
LO
Ln
Ln
Ln
0
m
C)
C)
r -i
as
41
ra
0
F34
H
C:
ul
13
0
w
O�
04
0
0
ra
as
0
from the site. Only barium, iron, manganese, and zinc were
detected in the river (Ford et al. 1984). The sensitivity of
the analytical methods used was not adequate to detect levels
of arsenic, cadmium, and lead that might be of concern. Although
iron, manganese and zinc were present at slightly higher levels
downstream than upstream, the data were insufficient to make
any reliable comparisons.
3. Groundwater
Groundwater from seven wells in the vicinity of the Smuggler
Mountain site was sampled and analyzed for metals (Ford et al.
1984) Based on their, location and the assumption that a ground-
water gradient exists from the mountain to the Roaring Fork
River, i.e., generally east to west across the site, three of
these wells are probably upgradient and unlikely to be repre-
se,ntative of groundwater at the site. Concentrations of metals
in these three wells are considered to represent background
levels for comparison purposes® of the four remaining wells,
two are classified as downgradient on the basis of both their
location and the fact that the PH and specific conductance
of water from those wells were clearly different from those
of the background wells. For the purposes of this analysis
the remaining two wells are classified as downgradient solely
on the basis of their location. Analyses of samples from all
four "downgradient" wells were combined to compile Table 3.
Table 3 presents the results of the analyses for metals
of water samples from the seven wells in the vicinity of the
kv
El
E-
H
0 ul
c�
Uz
E
w�
0
W
C%4
0 Q
E-
g Ez
U
7,
0
U
,,
r
3
ra
�a
O
n
asqT
r T rrr co
C:) car
C:),
F -I 110
r-4
IZV
c)
Ln
co
w
0
C4
ra
�o
`
c
Ln r
rd w
CN
\
r-
v
`.,, '-,
u1
(13
-)
Ln
,
a
r s
ra
CD
m
C
CD V)
—4
co
C)
Lr) M
00
rO r-4
C,
a)
4
U)
r-4
c�
�a u�
4J
�a ua
I
w
r' I
N
ryl
CD 1-I
CD C) c"°1
—4
55
0
asqT
r T rrr co
C:) car
C:),
F -I 110
r-4
IZV
c)
ro
0
C4
ra
�o
`
c
Ln r
rd w
CN
\
r-
v
`.,, '-,
u1
(13
-)
\
,
a
r s
ra
CD
m
C
CD V)
—4
b+
C)
Lr) M
00
ro
0
`
c
'`
\
\
\
`.
\
`.,, '-,
V
(13
-)
\
,
a
r s
ra
CD
m
C
CD V)
—4
b+
C)
Lr) M
00
C,
U)
r-4
z
—4
0
,4
Ln
41
as
CD
Lr)
Ln
CDa
up
s
r
41
0
4
ro
0
c
rp
•4
=
E
w
a
a
cu
0
0�+
m
(13
-)
CW,7
Smuggler Mountain site® The limits of detection for the analy--
tical methods for arsenic, cadmium, and lead were 50, 5 and
30 pg/liter respectively. The ambient water quality criteria
for the protection of human health for these metals are either
below the limit of detection (arsenic) or within an order of
magnitude over the limit of detection (see Apapendix A). Thus
levels of arsenic that may present a significant risk to human
health could not have been detected. Also levels of cadmium
and lead just below half the concentration that is considered
safe would not be detected. Because of these limitations it
is not possible, to determine a meaningful mean concentration
of these metals in groundwater at or near levels that may pose
some human health risks.
One of the downgradient wells showed elevated levels of
cadmium and was sampled again. Barium, cadmium, chromium, copper,
iron, manganese, and zinc were detected in the downgradient
wells. All of these except cadmium and chromium were detected
in the background wells. Elevated iron concentrations were
found only in one downgradient well. Tn the other downgradient
wells and in soil samples from the site, iron levels were compar-
able to background levels. The high concentrations in the
water could be an artifact of well construction. Although the
data set was small, it appears that elevated, levels of cadmium,
copper, iron, and zinc were present in the downgradient wells.
4. Air
EEI (1985) took a total of 115 samples of particulate
matter from a background site and four onsite locations. One
kffi
of the onsite locations was sampled in duplicate to determine
sampler variability and another had a second high volume sampler
designed to only collect respirable (<10 1i in size) particulates.
A compilation of these data is presented in Table 4. In this
analysis the respirable samples were separated, from the other
onsite samples and the average of the two duplicate samples
was used to give a single value from the samplers' location.,
For the purpose of calculating the mean, a value of one-half
the detection limit was assigned to samples in which the metal
was not detected. Analysis revealed that elevated levels of
cadmium, lead, and zinc were detected in the air onsite when
compared to the background site. However, none of the values
were above the recommended 24-hour maximum air concentrations
derived by HEI (1985).- A review of the data in Table 4 indicates
that the ratios of the concentrations of metals in the air
to the concentration of particulate matter are very similar
to the concentrations of the metals in the soil at the site.
In other words, airborne particulates at the site contain the
same concentrations of the metals as does the soil.
5. Blood revels
The results of the screening study for ZPP levels are
shown in Table 5. Of the 22 persons who volunteered for testing,
15 were children, age 12 and under, who currently resided in
the vicinity of the Smuggler Mountain sitein the judgment
of the individuals conducting the study only one child had an
abnormally high ZPP level (4.2 Rg/g Hgb). A sample of blood
N
1%
I VI
W r c E
0 .0
E N. u z
0 Ic = . a 0 r -
u a X
'D v 10
0K E r,4 x rq
E
n
01
C)
'n
'w
0
co
%0
r-
-T'
LA
4ti
03
m
a
ON
co
C2
.4
0
C)
C?
-I
�
m
a%
In
M
Vl
r4
c3
rot
X
4
C3
M17vi
m
Irl
rb
kn
C3
1=
co
CD
C3
In
rti
an
w
Ln
(4
00
rn
I'm
Cs
-Ir
r
mei
r rn
Vl
ri
CN
f"
aD
Ln
lo
CD
CD
c�
Q
CD
%0
(n
c:
:1 0
U4
Q
c
o
a
o
0 w
.4,
ti IW
as
t.
ilx
ri
(a
a*
ca
m
co
13
w
Q3
C
E
n
01
C)
'n
'w
0
co
%0
r-
-T'
LA
4ti
N ID
w
ka
C2
.4
0
0
cn
C3,
CA
tl1r4
Ln
f" ON
00
ca
(30
as
cn
C3
ko
4
rb
kn
C3
1=
co
CD
C3
In
rti
an
w
Ln
(4
00
rn
I'm
Cs
-Ir
r
mei
r rn
Vl
elN
U
.4,
as
t.
ilx
13
C
4),
C4
ea
ladpraczlotpo
Aj
C:
m
u
0
C
TABLE 5
Age of Subject
ZPA
C6i9/g H bj
12
2.2
10
104
2 3/4
2.8
1
2.5
30
2«2
30
1®6
1.5
462
35
2.2
8
1,6
8
2.3
6
2.7
2
1.8
1 1/4
0.9
4.5
1.0
4 -
1.2
1
1.4
4
1®5
7
2.2
53
1.
19
1.4
--
2.2
1.8
m
from this child was analyzed for lead and was found to have
a concentration of 12 �g/dl which is normal for a child of that
age. These data are not adequate to demonstrate the absence
of elevated lead levels in individuals living in the vicinity
of the Smuggler Mountain site.
D . Summary of 'Results
Careful review of the resiults of sampling and analyses
indicate that levels of lead and zincdetected in the soil and
mine tailings at the site are greatly elevated when compared
to a background sample from the same area and in comparison
to normal background levels. Arsenic, cadmium, copper, and
mercury were detected at levels approximately one order of
magnitude above the expected background levels reported by
Connor and Shacklette (1975). Two chemicals, barium and mang'a-
nese, are somewhat elevated in contrast to measured and expected
background levels. Finally, three chemicals, chromium, and
vanadium were detected at the site at background levels and
can be removed from further consideration in the risk assess-
ment.
21
III. HAZARD ASSESSMENT
A. Health Effects
For a more deta iled presentation of the health effects
associa ted with exposure to the various heavy metals see
Appendi x A.
Inhalation of arsenic oy humans is strongly associate4
with lung cancer and poss,iDly with hepatic angiosarcoma , and
ingestion of arsenic in drinking water has oeen linked to a
characteristic form of dermal cancer in humans. Arsenic has
t)een to oe fetotoxic, emoryotoxic, and teratogenic in several
a nima 1 studies Chronic expo -sure to arsenic affects the, nervous
system and can cause dermal lesions and cardiovascular disease.
In general, the trivalent form of arsenic is more toxic than
the pentavalent form.
The Carcinogen Assessment Group (CAG) of EPA determined
the unit risk for lifetime exposure to arsenic, to oe 0.405
(mg/liter)-1 (USEPA 1980a). -This is equivalent to a concentra-
tion of 2.5 ng/liter in drinking un ter for a risk of 10-6 (USEPA
1980a ). The EPA Amoient Water Quality Criteria for arsenic
(level corresponding to a cancer risk, of 10-6) is 2.2 ng/liter,
for exposure to contaminated %ater and consumption of fish.
The Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulation for arsenic, is
50 pg/liter (40 CFR 141).
M
Arsenic is present at potentially ha za rdous levels at
the Smuggler Mounta in site and the ref ore will oe cons id,e red
in the suosequ ent section on exposure and risk assessment .
� M
Sol uol e sa I ts of La ri um a re hi g hl y a cutel y toxi c to huma ns
when ingested® No information on the carcinogenicity, reproduc-
tive toxicity, or chronic toxicity was found in the sources
reviewed. `:he OSHA Standard of a®5 m,g/m 3 for soluole tearium
compounds is tmsed on the exposure to oarium nitrate that was
tolerated for several years oy workers at Los Alamos National
Laoora tory (Stokinger 1981). The EPA Interim Primary Drinking
Water S-tandard of 1 mg/liter is also eased on this study (47 F'R
10998 1982).
As the total amount of terium that would oe ingested or
inhaled at the Smuggler Mountain site is t)etween 1 and 3 orders
of magnitude oelow the dose derived from current standards,,
tarium is not hazardous at the S-miuggler Mountain site.
3. Cadmium
An increased incidence of lung tumors has oeen associated
with occupational exposure to cadmium, and mice given cadmium
chloride intratracheally also developed lung tumors. Cadmium
t)ioaccumulates in the kidneys, where it can cause renal tuoular
dysfunction. Chronic exposure to cadmium is also suspected
to produce hypertension, anemia , sensory loss (particularly
smell), endocrine alterations, and immunosuppression (USEPA
1980o) .
Wj
EPA (USEPA 1980o) esta olished an ambient Aa ter quality
criterion of 10 jig/liter on the basis of the "generally accepted"
es,timate of 200 pg/g wet weight of cadmium in the renal cortex
as the critical concentration for renal toxicity. More recent
information suggests that as little as 60 jig/9 wet weight of
cadmium may cause nephritis, in which case the threshold daily
intake would be 75-105 jig/day, rather than 250-350 pg/day as
previously suggested. In addition to this new information on
renal toxicity, inhalation exposure to cadmium has been more
firmly associated with lung cancer. CAG (USEPA 1984) used
the epidemiologic data of Thun et al. (1984) to determine a
best estimate for unit risk of 2.3 x 19-3 (jig/ m 3 F 1 , which
equals an excess, risk of 10-6 a ssocia ted with lifetime expo-
sure to a concentration- of 0.4 ng/m3 in, the air.
Based on its high toxicity, particularly the renal toxicity
associated with ingestion and the possible lung cancer associated
with inhalation exposure, cadmium is of major concern at the
Smuggler Mountain site,.
U I INo-- =-
Copper is not a major concern as a toxic agent to humans.
The current EPA Ambient Wa ter Quality Criterion is 1 mg/liter
based on organoleptic quality rather than toxicity (USEPA 1980c).
6
Copper is present nea r the Smuggler Mountain a t levels over
an order of magnitude lower than the criterion level . Therefore,
copper prom oly does not present a health h-3 za rd in the vicinity
of the S muggl er M oun to i n s ite .
RE
MESA=
The major ef f ects caused by exposure to lipad, alre toxicity.. -
to the h,ema topoietic system and neurological effects. Although
an apparent threshold has been determined for the acute neuro-
logic effects seen in lead poisoning, no threshold has been
determined for the effects of lead on heme synthesis or on
learning a bility in exposed children. Dead can also cause
renal dysfunction at blood lead levels as low as 40 jig/dl and
is known to be teratogenic to animals.
The USE,PA Interim Primary Drinking Water S.tandard and
Ambient Water Quality Criterion f'or lead are both 50 pg/liter
(USEPA 1 980d , 47 FR 109 9i8 1982) The Centers for Disease Control
(CDC) currently defines "lead toxicity" in a child a a blood
lead level > 30 mg/dl and an erthryocyte protoporphyrin (EP)
> 50 jig/dl. However, CDC is presently revising its criteria for
lead toxicity to blood lead levels > 25 pg/dl and EP > 35 pg/1
(Schilling et al. 1984) .
The high levels of lead in the soil and mine tailings on
the Smuggler • site may N• a potential health ha zard
to people living nearby.
G. Manganese
Chronic exposure to manganese -containing dust has been
associated with neurological effects similar to Parkinson's
disease in workers. Although exposure to the workers %as appar-
.
eptly by inhalation, there is some evidence that much of the
inhaled manganese is subsequently coughed up and ingested. One
25
case study in which a family ingested contaminated drinking
water and exhit)ited symptoms of manganese poisoning also suggests
that manganese is toxic when ingested. Chronic exposure to
manganese also affects the hematopoietic system.
The OSHA Standard for manganese dust is 5 mg/m3' in the
air, corresponding to a dose of approximately 1 mg/kg/day for
man.
The levels of manganese present in the S.muggler Mountain
site are promoly not sufficiently high to tae of concern oy
themselves. However, manganese has neurotoxic effects and the
dose levels associated with neurotoxicity of ingested manganese
have not oeen defined. Also, the potential interactive effects
of manganese and lead have not been thoroughly studied. There-
fore, the elevated levels of manganese present at the site
may tie of concern as a potential complicating health hazard.
7. Mercury
The primary effect associated with exposure to mercury is
neurotoxicity to both the central and peripheral nervous systems.
Mercury is a teratogen and causes reproductive toxicity. Chronic
exposure to mercury caused morphological changes in the kidneys
of rats given doss of 0.025 mg/kg/day for two years.
The EPA Amnient Water Quality Criterion for human health
;es 10 pg/liter in drinking water (US.EPA 1980e). The EPA interim
Primary Drinking Water Standard for mercury is 2 jig/kg/day
47 FR 10998 1982) . These criteria give approximate human
doses of 3 pg/kg/day and it }ng/kg/day, respectively, and appear
adequate to protect human health.
a
Based on the levels of mercury detected in the soil and,
tailings, mercury is unlikely to, be a significant health hazard
at the Smuggler Mountain site.
8. Zinc
Zinc is not highly toxic to humans and in fact, is an
essential element. The USEPA Amoient Water Quality Criterion
and Secondary Drinking Water Standard are troth 5 mg/liter cased
on organoleptic qualities (USEPA 1980f 1 40 CFR 141) .
Based on the levels reported at, the site, zinc is unlikely
to pose a health ha za rd to people li ving nea, r the Smuggler
Mountain site. More importantly, zinc is, known to interact
antagonistically with other metals which a re present at the
site such as cadmium and lead.
B. Toxicity to Wildlife,
Many of the metals present at elevated concentrations in
the soil and mine tailings on the Smuggler Mountain site are
extremely toxic to fish and other aquatic life. Trout, the
fish likely to tie of most importance in the Roaring Fork River,
are very susceptible to the effects of many toxic materials.
Ta tDle 6 shows the acute LC 50 value and chronic toxicity value
for exposure of rainnow trout (Salmo 2airdneri) to the various
metals. In all cases the lowest LC 50 or chronic toxicity values
reported for the species were used. Waters in Colorado generally
have a hardness of around 150 mg/liter (Sawyer and McCarthy
1978) , and this value was used in cases where hardness 'was
important.
RE
NOM
TABLE 6
TOXICITY OF METALS PRESENT AT THE SMUGGLER MOUNTAIN
SITE TO RAINBOW TROUT (Salmo gairdneri)
96 Hour LC 50
(pg/ lite r)
Chronic Toxicity Value
(*Pg/liter; duration)
Arsenic
10, 800
550; 28 days
Ba r um
NA a
NA
Cadmium
110
5; 17 days
Copper
200
50; 28 day's
Lead
A-5 0, 0000
871 29 weeks
Manganese
NA
NA
Mercury
29c -
0.04; 64 days
Zinc
1,,910
277; 28 days
a NA = Not availa t)le
0 Toxicity tesed on hardness; reported value is order of magni,-
tude approximation
cValues are for meth,ylmercury
SOURCE: U,SEPA (1980a -f)
1,
More det3 i led inf ormation on the toxicity of the specific
heavy metals to wildlife is provided in the Appendix .
IV. EXPOSURE AND RISK ASSESSMENT
A. Introduction
As discussed in Section I of this report, preliminary
studies indica to tha t several metals -3 re present in soil and
groundwa ter in the vicinity of the Smuggler Mount3 in site at
levels significantly a cove oackground levels. In Section II
the potential adverse effects of these metals on human health
and the environment were discussed. In this section we will
discuss potential human exposure to some of these metals in
order to attempt to determine the potential human health risks,
associated with that exposure. Because of the preliminary
nature of the analytical results and the consequent uncertain-
ties involved in quantitative risk assessment, this report
will not attempt to provide quantitative estimates of human
health risks associated with exposure to metals in the vicinity
of the Smuggler Mountain site® Riather, this assessment will
attempt to assess the procaoility that contamination of the
site is likely to pose unacceptable human health risks in.the
ar)sence of remedial action and to define concentrations in
soil that might be considered to be unaccepta ble levels of
contamination.
5. Potential Ex29sure Pathwa,ys
Direct ingestion of the contaminated soil is a potentially
significant route of exposure, especially for young children
W1
who constitute the most sensitive population. Young children
may ingest contamina ,ted dirt by normal mouthing of soiled objects
and their hands or by pica , the actual consumption of dirt
(Mahaffey 1978). Older children are less likely to eat soil
or to mouth soiled objects, but they still may ingest dirt
from their [-ends. Kimurough et a�l. (1984) have estimated the
daily p ttern of soil ingestion for specific age groups as
follows:
0-9 months of age 0 grams/day
9-18 months of age I gram/day
1 .5-3 .5 yea rs of age 10 grams/day
39.5-5 yea rs of age I gram/day
>5 yea rs of age 0.1 gram/day
Adults onsite may ingest some co.ntamina ted Soil but a re in
general less likely to be exposed by this route. Some pregnant
women exhibiting pica ,-however, may eat significant amounts
of soil or tailings.
Dermal contact is another potential route of exposure
to contaminated soil and tailings. Persons working or playing
on the site may get substantial amounts of dirt on their skin
and clothes. secondary dermal exposure may occur when the
soiled clothes are washed. However, lead and the other metals
are poorly absorbed throug h the intact skin when present in
an inorganic farm Therefore, dermal absorption is protaoly
an insignificant route of exposure relative to other potential
pa thwa ys .
The consumption of Vegetables grown in contaminated soil in
home gardens may oe a significant route of exposure. The avail -
axle evidence suggests that lead and mercury are not readily taken
N
up by plants. On the other hand, arsenic, cadmium, manganese,
and zinc are readily absorbed by plants and may ue present
in excess levels in vegetables grown in the contaminated soil
or tailings. The phytotoxicity of arsenic, manganese, and
zinc may limit the amount of these elements in ediole plants
such that levels that are toxic to, humans may not be reached
(Chaney et al. 1984).
2. Household Dust
Dust is a normal component of the indoor environment.
It accumulates on all surfaces exposed to the air and the depo-
sition rate is a function of the concentration of suspended
p3rticul3te matter in the air. The concentration of heavy
metals in household dust is proportional to the concentrations
of metals in both the air and in the soil but few, studies are
available which specifically relate the concentration of indi-
vidual metals in dust to air and soil levels. Humans are exposed
to household dust both by ingestion and by inhalation. Ingestion
occurs by hand -mouth contact and by consumption of food from
surfaces (dishes and food preparation vessels) on which dust
has collected. Inhalation occurs when dust is distributed
and suspended in the course of normal domestic activities.
Although exposure to dust may be a significant pathway of human
exposure to metals in the vicinity of the Smuggler Mountain
site, it has not been explicitly considered in this assessment
because of the lack of data on the metal content of household
dust and the lack of informa tion in the literature on the esti-
mated da i ly i nt:3 ke of household dust. Exposure to household
dust is implicitly included in the assessment of human health
risks associated with exposure to lead at the Smuggler Mountain
site because studies that relate blood lead levels to soil
lead levels include exposure via household dust as one of several
probable routes of exposure®
-MI
There are three potential routes of exposure to contiminants
in surface mter. Direct ingestion of contaminated.water could
lead to significant exposures, Dermal contact with contaminated
wa ter either by swimming or bathing could be a minor pathway.
The available analytical data indicate that toxic metals are
not present at detectable levels in the Roaring Fork River.
Also the river is apparently not used as a source of drinking
water, and its temperature and small size make it unattractive
for swimming, and therefore these two routes of exposure are
prong bly unimportant. Persons consuming fish, from the Roaring
Fork on a regular oasis might be exposed to heavy metals if,
in the future, metals leach from the smuggler Mountain site
and enter the surface drainage. However, the fish species
in the river are very sensitive to intoxic.3tion by heavy metals
and it is unlikely that high levels of metals would be present
in the fish. Therefore, fish consumption is protaoly not a
major route of exposure. The, available evidence would indicate
that at present surface water is not a significant potential
medium of human exposure.
KPJ
4. Ground w3 ter
The potential exists for some households in the vicinity
of the Smuggler Mountain site to use groundwater as their sole
w3ter source. Others may use groundwater for activities such
as w-itering a garden. Direct ingestion of groundwater is the
major route by which exposure to contaminated groundwater would
occur. Bathing and washing could also be a significant exposure
pa th,wa y.
Airborne dispersion of contaminated soil and ta i lings
is potentially an important route of transport. Inhalation of
suspended particulates by either construction -workers or the
general population may be an important exposure pathway especi-
ally if the soil or tailings are disturbed. Inhalation of the
very small amount of metal that may volatilize is not likely
to be important., Deposition of the windoorne rarticulates in
houses or on the leaves of edible plants may lead to increased
exposure to contaminants.
6 . Summary
For adults, the, most important potential exposure pathways
are ingestion of groundwater and inhalation of airborne dirt
and household dust. Ingestion of vegetables grown in contamin-
ated soil may also be a contributing route of exposure. For
children, the additional route of ingestion of contaminated
soil becomes potentially important. Because of the greater
potential exposure of children to contaminated soil and the
evidence tha t young children a re more sensitive to the toxic
effects of lead than are adults, the remainder of this exposure
and risk assessment will focus on children as the target pope
-
lati on. Furthermore, because of the fact that the levels of
lead and cadmium are relatively more elevated compared to back®.
ground concentrations than some of the other metals and because
of their inherent toxicity, they have been selected as the
indicator pollutants for the, purposes of risk assessment.
C. Lead
ordinarily, in order to assess the human health consequences
of exposure to a toxic chemical, the concentrations of the
chemical in various media aremultipliedby the daily exposures
to those media and modified by, appropriate absorption factors
to estimate the total daily dose of the toxic chemical. Thi s
daily dose is then compared with an experimental or hypothetical
dose -response function to estimate the incidence or severity
of intoxication. Extensive investigations of lead, however,
have indicated that the adverse effects of lead are critically
dependent upon the chemical form of the lead in the environment,
as well as the rate and frequency of exposure. The oi ol ogi ca, 1
response is also dependent on the age of the exposed individual.
Natural background exposures to lead are highly variable.
For these reasons, the same daily dose in mg/kg/day may have
different biological effects in two individuals exposed under
different circumstances. Therefore, measures of total lead
in the body are believed to be more accurate correllates of
35
lead efE ects than are daily exposures one such measure is the
concentration of lead in the blood. As indicated in Section Ii
above, blood levels of lead in children above 25 pg/dl are
considered to be cause for concern.
EPA has recently reviewed a numuer of studies which are
useful in relating blood levels in children to levels of lead
in the environment (EPA 1984c). Table 7 shows the relationship
r>--tween air lead concentrations and blood lead levels in children
as determined from three studies. These slopes range, from
1.52-2.46 pg/dl per lag/m3 in air. Table 8 relates blond lead
levels in children to soil lead levels. Here the slopes range
from 0.6 to 7.6 jig/dl per 1,000 ppm. This range of slopes
is much greater than those determined for air exposure. This
va ri a oi lit y pr oce bl, y reflects the different characteristics
of the lead in the soil as well as other uncontrolled va ria tiles.
The studies of Angle and McIntire, Yankel et al., Walter
et al., and Neir et al. were performed in the vicinity, of lead
smelters. Three other studies (Galke et al., Sta rk et al.,,
Ba rl trop et al.) were conducted in urban areas where automobile
exhaust and lead paint flakes were the major contributors to
soil lead. Thus none of these studies is of a population directly
comparable to the population living near Smuggler Mountain.
The lead present a t Smuggler Mountain is most likely bound
in a natural mineral matrix and its oicavail ability may differ
from that of soil lead from atmospheric sources.
im
Population
O hi ldren
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF BLOOD INHALATION SLOPES, (b)
(Ug/dl per pg/m3)
S tudy
Angle and
McIntire (1979)
Omaha , Nebraska
Reels et al
(1960)
Bel gi um
Yankel et al
(1977) , Walter
et al. (1960
Ida ho
S turfy
Type N
s +�
37
MR.
mm
rj Slope
N e r
�, f
4-)
ca1
clt
,--A
rq�
4
C
ryy)
Wryry
y
p --A I
Ln
0)
4
4d
4 4
1-4 :1�
z
14 Cq
vd
rD
r®I
orb
r^0
yy�q�
pV� �yD
C P^Y
•
�J�
Lnko
p q
QyT��
.•gy�pp+y
i
1 �
Vd
ro, f,
4 `W
KV
I�T
po
yF^�<�J
0
W r�yy4
W
0
r-4
CN
Kv
• V
+' d
4 v0
CN
G.1
p-J�
�Y.dJ
a) VJ
-4 En
4d •
m
V8
(�wuy
0
-
CD r- c)
r -
rr0ryry
yd J1
Cq
CD
CD
'CD
ON
0
CD
V "
CD l^
CD
io
CD
co 'W r^a� co
qM
W
ryryqq
o
PON
l"
1�,
V �A
p
W ,' I
\�
V 1
Ws44
',.' P
. %
F 4' Y
� 9
�w9�"
c
r
r I .�
I}
�Ha
vY'
PII
M "' v'
r, 1. Y
'4 V
S.
p
el • �
p
Ski ♦ Y'
I
I d)
1 tHi
1
4 Q)
0 a)
CD
Ln W 0) Lf)
is al
M
k
o (0
CD r�3
C)
C14
CN �, m w *a
ro
PG
rn --
rn
Ln
CN
v
co
CA
rd
ro
a)
C
<
M
•�
,-P
co
�
W
4-J
MA
44
44
4 W I)
44
0
4
0
0
0 C
q
E-
4
�
r
U >i
( )
r ! "*r
4 >1>1
7y
�
C'
r -p "Ga
tTd '*J r- 1:�
r -j rc) C A
41 'a C
°' a C
ras
0
Q) U] C
4JU1 C 4-)
0,U a',
VI r-
(1)
ty
>
(D (1) to
0 0
4J N C
4J
W
(U
—4
W CU
'y W
W — Lr t11
0
Ci)
N ra
cm 'La
ai) r- [a b
4a rn "o .--I
4J U-) rO
co ra •ra
C.
-Li
ro
r-4 co r --I
co -
-�e r� rl ,-A
ae r- -4 La
r- 4
• 4 r' -4 4
C
J
dro
M. 4
C M•4r-i
a)
f 0)•4
(M -4,
=
W .4" 1
'w
•
r-1
-C;
r-4rt_
(1) r -I -C
M
4"'rJo
En—U'
u�4
C)`•'UU
as—U
z—U' ca
44
For the purpose of assessing potential health risks in
the vicinity of the Smuggler Mountain site, Clement has assumed
a slope of 2.0 pg/d'l per 1,000 ppm lead in the soil. This
is near t h e lower 1imit of t h e range of slopes in Table 8 and
is consistent with the position to ken by EPA (EPA 198 4) . Thus,
the following assumptions can be used to estimate potential
blood lead levels among children living nea r the Smuggler Mountain
site:
Baseline blood lead level in the aosence
of exposure from Smuggler Mountain = 12.7 pg/dl*
Blood level vs. air level slope 2.0 pg/dl per pg/m3
Blood level vs. soil level slope
*Median blood level in white children aged 6 months to
5 years living in rural a -rens in the U.S.. (NHANES Il as
cited in EPA 1984)
33sed on these assumptions a child living in the vicinity of
the Smuggler Mountain site might be expected, on average, to
P ave a blood lead level c3i
0.19i + 2.0 x 4.06 = 21.2 jig/dl
Because of the normal distribution Of blood levels about the
mean, a significant number of children would be expected to have
blood lead levels in excess of 25 pg/dl. In other words, the
levels of lead present in the soil in the vicinity of the Smuggler
Mountain site may be unacceptably high and may contribute to
a significant risk of health impairment, if the assumptions
made in this assessment are valid.
W
The uncertainties inherent in this assessment are very
large. For example, if the slope of the relationship between
blood lead and soil lead is assumed to be 3.0 (well within
the range of slopes reported in Table 8) , then the mean blood
level for children in the vicinity of Smuggler Mountain would
c)e 25.3 pg/dI. If blood levels are calculated for a child
living in an area of ma ximum air and soil contamination the
blood level would be
12.7 + 2.0 x 0.81 + 2.0 x 8.53 = 31.4 pg/dl
It is of interest to comms re the results of the a Bove
assessment with the results of recent studies of children living
in Shoshone County, Idaho (Schilling et al. 198 4) Among
children living in the vicinity of a closed l,ead, smelter the
mean blood level, was 21 pg/dl and 35% of the children had blood
levels of greater than 25 pg/dl. The mean air level of lead
was 0.28 pg/m3 and the mean soil level of lead was 6,059 ppm.
These levels are comp ra ole to those found in the vicinity
of Smuggler Mountain, although the chemical form of lead in
the soil at smelter sites is certa in to be different than that
at Smuggler Mountain. children li ving slightly farther a wa y
from the smelter had a mean blood level of 17 ung/dl. The mean
air concentration was 0.12 p9/m3 and the mean soil concentration
;,as 3,432 ppm. Of these children 15% had blood lead levels
in excess of 25 pg/dl. Even in children born after the smelter
closed and airborne lead concentrations were reduced, blood
lead levels were excessively high. The authors of an earlier
study of children in this community concluded that soil lead
W,
levels in excess of 1,000 ppm were cause for concern (Yankel
et al. 1977 as cited in USEPA 1984c).
D Ca dmi um
Cadmium has teen found at elevated concentrations in soil
and groundwq ter in the vicinity of the Smuggler Mountain site.
Child,ren are proCably exposed through inhalation of airoorne
pa rticul3 tes and household dust, ingestion of dirt, ingestion
of vegeta tiles grown in contaminated soil, and drinking of ground-
wa ter. It is poss i ole to calcula to an average daily dose for
a child living near the site for 20 years following mirth.
1. Inhalation
Assume that a child inhales 15 m3 /day (Kimorough et al. 1984).
Mean air concentration at Smuggler Mountain site of respiraule
cadmium 1.4 ng/m 3
Daily exposure = 21 ng/day
21. Inqestion of Dirt
Assume that child plays outdoors 100 days/year
Total amount of soil ingested each year and cadmium intake
oased on average cadmium concentration of 26 �g/gram.
Dirt Ingested Total Dirt Tota 1
Ae Ingested _(qj Cadmium
0-1 0 0 0
1-2 1 100 2.6
2-4 10 2,1000 52
4-5 1 100 2.6
5-20 0.1 150 3.9
41
Total intake in 2,0 years averaged over 7,300 days = 8.4 jig/day
#nly a tDout 5% of ingested cadmium is a osoroed f rom the
gut (Grant et al. 1981). Daily absorned dose = 420 ng/day
3. Inqestion of Veqeta tiles Grown in Contamina ted Soi
Assume that a child li,ving in a home with a ga rden consmes
100 g wet weight of vegeta bleS from the garden 100 days of the
year. Chaney et al. (1984) reported that lettuce grown in soil
averaging 37 ppm cadmium contained 1.17 ppm cadmium on a wet
weight ba s is . Since leafy vegeta tiles take up more cadmium than
others, we will assume that the cadmium content of vegeta tiles
grown in the vicinity of the Smuggler Mountain site is 0.1 ppm.
Total cadmium intake per year-= 100 g x 100 days x 0.1 'Pq = 1,000 Pg
gram
Average over 365 days - = 2 . 7 jig/da y x 5 % a osor ption, = 14 0 ng/da y
4. Ingestion of Groundwa ter
Assume that a child ingests 1.5 liters, of water/day
Average cadmium concentration = 7 pg/liter
Daily intake = 10.5 pg x 5% absorption = 525 ng/day
Based on
these reasonaole assumptions a
child living
near
the Smuggler
Mountain site might ne exposed
to an average
daily
dose of approximately 22 jig/day of cadmium.
This estimated cadmium intake is glow the daily intake
of 75-105 jig that is believed to result in adverse effects on
the kidney in humans (Grant et al. 1981). However, there are
important sources of uncertainty in these estimates that could
M
ciently high to be of concern. In the absence of more definitive
information regarding exposure to cadmium and the oioavailaoil-
ity of cadmium in the soil, there is the potential for some
individuals to be exposed to total daily doses capable of causing
impaired kidney function. There is also a possibility of unac-
ceptaole cancer risk among individuals exposed to airborne
particulates from the site.
RMWORM"WESTAN009 OWN
nated soil as airborne dust in the vicinity of the Smuggler
Mountain site, there is a potential risk of cancer. The mean
concentration of respirable particulate matter measured at
the site was 17 ug/m3 (see Table 4). If the concentration
of cadmium in the soil is 10 pg/g and the airborne particulate
matter at the site consists entirely of suspended soil, the
3
air concentration of respirable cadmium would be .17 ng/m,
This is just less than half of the air concentration which
has been estima ted by EPA to result in a cancer risk of 1 in
1,000,000. Because, residents are also likely to be exposed
to cadmium by �ters other than inhalation, a concentration
of 10 lig/g of cadmium in the soil is considered to be an accept-
able, upper limit.
E. Other Elements
Arsenic is present in levels above background in soil
samples, from the Smuggler Mountain site. The available evidence
suggests that arsenic is carcinogenic in humans both by inha-
lation and ingestion. Using the same assumptions as for cadmium
W
0
a child ingesting soil containing 82 ppm arsenic in the vicinity
of Smuggler Mountain would incur an average daily exposure
of 26 jig/day. Since 95% of ingested arsenic is absorbed the
average daily absoroed dose of arsenic from soil ingestion
alone would be 25 pg/day. ingestion of 1®5 liters of drinking
water per day containing arsenic at the primary drinking water
standard of 50 jig/liter would provide a daily dose of 75 jig/day.
Thus, the 25 jig/day intake of arsenic from ingestion of soil
by itself provides a least a third of the acceptable daily
inta ke for this element. Furthermore, this inti ke is far in
excess of the daily dose estimated to result in an excess cancer
risk of 1 in 1,000,000 by OSHA and CAG. Since children will
also be exposed to arsenic by inhalation and from their diet,
this soil concentration does not allow for an adequate margin
of safety®
F. Interactions
For the purposes of this assessment, the effects of expo-
sure to the toxic metals present at the Smuggler Mountain site
have been considered separately and independently out, because
these pollutants occur together in soil and air, individuals
will be exposed to all of them concurrently. There is little
specific information availa ole on interactions among these
elements. In the absence of such information, it is reasonable
to assume that their combined effects are at least additive.
This is particularly true for those compounds that effect the
same targets. Thus, for example, cadmium and lead both adversely
M9
effect kidney function. Therefore, even though estimated aver -age
daily cadmium doses in children were below those t ha t were
expected to induce renal tubular disease the added insult to
the kidneys caused by higher than average lead exposures may
significantly reduce the margin of safety. Similarly, a rsenic
and cadmium have both been implicated in the causation of human
lung cancer. Thus the risks associated with inhalation exposure
to these compounds would be expected to be at least additive.
M
V. MITIGATING FACTORS
The aVailable infora'3tion is not adequate to characterize
the nature and extent of contamination at the Smuggler Mountain
site. For this reason the assessment of potential human health
risks in the vicinity of the site is highly uncertain. We
have concluded that the most likely estim to indica tes that
there is a significant risk of health impairment among children
living near the site. This, conclusion must be qualified by
the existence of potential factors whose cumulative effect is
unknown (see Ta ble 9) . Several factors which might serve to
mitigate the human health risks posed by the presence of high
concentrations of metals in the soil in the vicinity of the
Smuggler Mine are discussed in this section.
A. Bioavailability (Physical -chemical cha racteristicsl
The analytical methods used to determine the concentra-
tion of the heavy metals in air, soil, and wt3 ter are designed
to detect the total quantity of those elements in the media
regardless of physical and chemical form. It is well-known
that the bioavailability of heavy metals is dependent on the
chemical matrices in which, they occur in the environment. The
chemical form of the met -31 may also determine the biological
activity of the metal once it is ar)soroed. Critical properties
which serve to determine the mobility of metals in the environ-
ment and thus influence their bioavailability and toxicity
include, sol uoility of the metal compounds, pH of the soil
M
Factors which contribute to an overestima tion of risk
1. It is assumed that the rAcavailability of lead in tailings
is equivalent to the bioavaila tDility of lead a t smelter
sites or in urwn areas.
2. Meteorologic cond,itions were not considered.
3. Cancer risk estimates are used on upper 95th confidence
limits from conservative models.
Factors which contribute to an underestimation of risk
1. Interactions (presumably additive) were not considered.
Exposure to household dust %zas not considered.
3. Exposure to toxic metals from normal tackground sources,
diet was not considered.
and wa ter, ionic strength of the wa ter, oxidation- reduction
potentials of the metal compounds and the soil matrix, and
the amount of organic material present in the soil. This infor-
mation is not available for the metals present at the Smuggler
Mountain site. Therefore, we have assumed, in the risk assess-
ment for lead, that the lead in the soil at Smuggler Mountain
is similar in its bioavailability to lead in the soil in urban
areas or in the vicinity of primary or secondary lead smelters.
It is quite possible that the lead at the Smuggler Mountain
site is much less bicavailaole in that it appears to be present
in a carbonate rock matrix (Jim Baker, EPA, personal communi-
cation)o. Lead carbonate is relatively insoluble and may be
much less oioavailable than lead sulfide and lead oxides.
This supposition is supported by the finding of relatively
low lead concentrations in surface and groundwa ter near the
site . Similar considerations may apply to other metals at
the site.
➢despite the relative insolubility of lead carbonate in
water, its is soluble in acid. Thus, the acid of the stomach
might be expected to soluoilize lead even in mineral matrices.
For this reason, it is plausible that the lead in ingested
soil might be readily available for aosorption after it reaches
the stomach. The solubility of lead compounds in acid also
raises the possibility of future groundwater contamination
by lead from the tailings and soil at the Smuggler Mountain
site should acid waters such as acid mine wastes percolate
I
49
through contamina ted soil. This would mobilize the lead and
leach it into the groundwater.
B. Meteorological Factors
The Smuggler Mountain site is located in an alpine environ-
ment and is, therefore, under snow cover for as much as six months
ea c h yea r Furthermore, during sn,owmelt, the surface soil is
likely to be saturated. During the time of snow cover and snow
melt there is negligible chance for exposure to contaminated
soil at the site. The alpine climate also necessitates a short
growing season making home gardening less attractive than in
more temperate climates. Thes,e, considerations need to be kept
in mind in comp ring metal exposure at Smuggler Mine with metal
exposures studied in more temperate locations. It should be
pointed out, however, that Shoshone County, Idaho has a similar
alpine clima te.
The pr.evailing wind patterns at the Smuggler Mine site
is diurnal with the wind blowing up the valley during the day
and down the valley du -ring the night (Tan Dunlop, Aspen -Pitkin
Environmental Health Department, personal communcation). Thus,
during the day, when dust -generating activities at the site
are most likely, the wind is blowing away from the inhabited
a rea . This may considerably reduce inhalation exposure to
airborne contaminated soil.
WO
I ! 11 11; 1 !!,
Based on the availa ole information it is Clement's conclu-
sion that unaccept3 ole health risks exist at the present time
for residents and workers at and in the vicinity of the Smuggler
Mountain site. These risks are associated with potential expo-
sure to cadmium and, lead in soil and mine tailings at the site.
As descrioed above, a great deal of uncertainty is associated
with this preliminary risk assessment due in large measure
to uncertainties, regarding estimated human exposure to metals
in the soil. Clement therefore recommends that further inves
-
tigation oe performed in order to reduce sources of uncertainty
in the assessment of health risks associated with this site.
This section of the report outlines the additional information
that should be acquired.
A. Ex sure Assessment
1. Soil
. 9 Conduct additional surface soil sampling in order
to establish reliable "tockground" soil co,ncentrations
for lead and cadmium and to define a 1,000 ppm isopleth
for lead and a 10 ppm isopleth for cadmium. Total
soil digestion should be used for these determinations.
e Establish the prevailing meterologic conditions at
the site in order to be a ble to model the dispersion
of airborne particulates from the site.
M
Using meterologic information, identify the residential
areas of highest predicted exposure and monitor air
at those locations for respirable particulates, lead,
cadmium, and arsenic. Monitoring should be sufficient
to be represents tine of variations due to activity
at the site and seasonal variations in meterologic
conditions.
Samples of both sail and to flings f rom the site should.
be studied to determine the relative bioavailability Of
metals in them. The chemical species of lead, cadmium,
and arsenic in the samples should be determined.
Also the extra cta bi lity of the metals from the soil
using hydrochloric acid and chelating agents should
be determined.,
2. Household Dust
9 Household dust samples should be collected from a
representative, sample of residences adjacent to the
site and these should be analyzed for lead, cadmium,
and arsenic content.
3. Surface Water
e Although not considered to be a significant medium
for human exposure at the site, surface %Aa ter drainage
patterns across, and f rom the site should be more
completely characterized and the pH of all surface
water entering and leaving the site should be deter-
mined to ensure that acid mine wastes are not leaching
metals from the soil.
W
4. Ground wi to
* Although not considered to De a significant medium
for human exposure, more data are needed on groundwater
gradients at the site in order to identify the location
where groundwater quality is most likely to tie affected
ray the site.
* Monitoring wells should tae identified and new ones
drilled in order the adequately characterize background
and downgradient water in the uppermost aquifer.
Samples from these wells should t)e analyzed for pH,
specific conductance, and priority pollutant metals.
Monitoring should ue continued as long as activities
at the site have the potential to alter soil characteristics
and drainage patterns.
5. Air
• Additional air monitoring as described under soil
a oove .
6. Identification of Ex sed P2E!�-I Motion
• All individuals living within, immediately adjacent
to, and a significant distance downwind or downgradient
(groundwater) of the site should tae identified as
to age, sex, and length of residence at the location.
All wells that are being used or have oeen used to
supply water for domestic use should oe identified.
53
B Risk Assessment
An assessment of individual and population risks can be
conducted cased on the available information and the additional
information gathered from the steps recommended above.A much
more direct assessment of risks can be achieved, however, by
determining blood lead levels in humans who have been potentially
exposed to mine wastes and contaminated soil from the Smuggler
Mounta in site. Clement recommends a survey as follows:
e Identify a sample population of individuals who have
lived on or within a mile of the site, for at least
two yea rs. Ascertain the age, sex, residential history,
employment history, and smoking history of these indi-
viduals .
9 Measure blood lead levels or urinary lead levels in
response to challenge with a chelating agent in the
potentially exposed population. Special attempts should
be made to perform such tests on all children between
the ages of 2-12 a nd on those adults who have lived
in the immediate vicinity of the site for 10 years
or more,
ME
REFERENCES
AMERICAN CONFERENCE OF GOVERNMENTAL INDUSTRIAL HYGIENISTS (ACGIH)
1980. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Valises. 4th
ed. Cincinnati, Ohio. 488 pages
BOON, D.Y. 1983. Soils Analysis and Recommendations, Proposed
Residential Development Centennial Project, Aspen, Colorado.
September 8, 1983
BOSTWICK, J.L. 1982. Copper toxicosis in sheep. J. Am. Vet.
Med. Assoc. 180:386-387
CHANEY, R.L., STERRETT, S.B., and MIELKE, H.W. 1984. The
potential for heavy metal exposure from urban gardens
and soils in P reer, J. R. , ed. Proceedings of a, Symposiu:m
on Heavy Metals in Urban Gardens. University of the, Dis-
trict of Columbia Extension Service, Washington, D.C.
Pp. 37 -8 4
CLEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. 1983. Assessment of the Weight of
Evidence for Risk Assessment for Four Selected Toxic Air
P ol I uta n ts . Report Prepared for the Air Economic, Branch,
OPRM, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. May 1.983
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (CDH). 1982. Heavy Metals in
Soil --Smuggler Trailer Park,. Aspen, Colorado. Results
of Analysis of Samples Collected 6/15/82 by Tom Dunlop
of Pitkin County Department of Environmental Health.
CDH, Division of Engineering and Sanitation
CONNOR, J J. , a, nd S HAC KLETTE, H T. 1975. Background Geochem-
istry of Some Rocks, Soils, Plants, and Vegetables in
the Conterminous United States. Statistical Studies in
Field Geochemistry. Geological Survey Professional Paper
574-F. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Washington, D.C.
DOULL, J., KLAASSEN, C.D. , and AMDUR, M.O. , eds . 1980. Casa nett
and Doull' s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons.
2nd ed. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York. 778 pages
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC. 1985. Report of Hi -Vol Air
Sampling Activities at the Old Smuggler Mine Study Area,
Aspen, Colorado. Report suomitted to EPA. January 24,
1985
FLEISCHER, M . , SAROFIM, A.F., FASSETT, D.W., HAMMOND, P.,
SCHAKKETTE, H.T., NISBET, I.C.T. , and EPSTEIN, S. 1974.
Environmental impact of cadmium: A review oy the panel
on hazardous trace substances. Environ. Health Perspect.
7:253-323
FORD, K., FOSTER, J., HENDERSON , T., and UPSON , G. 1984.
Interpretive Report and Health Risk Assessment of the
Smuggler Mine,- Aspen, Colorado. TDD R8-8401-15. March 9,
1984
GRANT, L.D., MUSHAK, P., CROCETTI, A., and GALKE, W. 1981.
Health Assessment Document for Cadmium. U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Environment Criteria and Assess-
ment Office, Research Triangle Park, N.C. October 1981.
EPA -600/8-81-023
KIMBROUGH, R.D., FALK, H., STEHR, P., and FRIES, G. 1984.
Health implications of 2 3 7,8- tetra chlorodinenzodioxin
(TCDD) contamination of residential soil in Lawrence,
W.W., ed., Public Health Risk of the Dioxins. Proceedings
of a Symposium Held on October 19-20, 1.983 at the Rocke-
feller Univerisyt, New York City, William Kaufmann, Los
Angeles. Pp. 121-150
MAHAFFEY, K.R. 1978. Environmental exposure to lead. In
Nria gu, J.O., ed. The Biochemistry of Lead in the Environ-
ment: Pa rt B. Biological Effects. Elsevier/North-Holland
Biomedical Press, New York. 397 pages
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH (NIOSH).
1983. Registry of Toxic -Effects of Chemical, Substances.
Data Base. Washington, D.C. October 1983
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (NAS) 1973. Medical and Biolo-
gical Effects of Environmental Pollutants: Manganese.
Washington, D.C. 191 pages
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (NAS). 1977. Drinking Water
and Health. Safe Drinking Water Committee, Washington,
D.C. 939 pages
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH (NIOSH).
1984. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances.
Data Base. Washington, D.C. October 1984
NEEDLEMAN, H.L., GEIGER, S.K., and FRANK, R. 1985. Lead and
IQ scores: A reanalysis. Science 227:701-704
SAWYER, C.N.,, and McCARTY, P L. 1978. Chemistry for Environ-
mental Engineering. Third Edition. McGraw-Hill. Book
Company, New York
SCHILLING, R., ROSS, D.,, SOKAL, D., ING, R., BROKOPP, C., and
MAUGHAN, A.D. 1984 Children's exposure to smelter -asso-
ciated lead, Montana and Idaho. In the Proceedings of
the 5th National Conference on Management of Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites. Washington, D.C. November 7-9,,
1984
STO KIN GER, H E. 1981. The metals. In Clayton, G.D. , and
Clayton, E.E . , eds . Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxico-
logy. John Wiley and Sons, New York
TAKENAKA, S., OLDIGES, H., KONIG, H., HOCHRAINER, D . , and
OBERDORSTER, G. 1983. Carcinogenicity of cadmium chloride
aerosols in W rats. JNCI 70:367-371
UNDERWOOD, E.J. 1979. Trace metals in humans and animal health.
J. Hum. Nutr. 35:37-48
U. S . ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (USEPA). 1980a . Amoi en t
Water Quality Criteria for Arsenic. Office of Water Regu-
lations and Standards, Criteria and Standards Division,
Washington, D.C. October 1980. USEPA 440/5-80-021
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (US,EPA). 19800. Ambient
Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium. Office of Water Regu-
lations and Standards, Criteria and Standards Division,
Washington, D.C. October 1980. EPA 440/5-80-025
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (USEPA). 1980c . Amoient
Water Quality Criteria for Copper. Office of Water Regula-
tions and Standards,. Criteria and Standards Division,
Washington, D.C. October 1980. EPA 440/5-80-036
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (USEPA,) . 198 Od . Ambient
Wa ter Quality Criteria for Lead. Office of Wa ter Regula-
tions and Stn ndard,s, Criteria and Standards Division,
Washington, D.C. October 1980. EPA 440/5-80-057
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (USEPA) . 1980e. Ambient
Water Quality Criteria for mercury. Office of Water Regu-
lations and St:andards, Criteria and Standards Division,
Washington, D.C. October 1980. EPA 440/5-,80-058
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (USEPA). 1980f Amoient
Water Quality Criteria for Zinc. Office of Water Quality
and Standards, Criteria and Standards Division, Washington,
D.C. October 1980. EPA 440/5-80-079
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (USEPA). 1983. Dra f t
Revised Section B of Ambient Water Quality Criteria for
Lead. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Criteria
and Standards Division, Washington, D.C. August 1983
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (USEPA). 1984a . Health
Assessment Document for Inorganic Arsenic. USEPA, Office
of Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C. March 1984.
EPA -600 /8 -B3 -021F
U. S . ENV IRON ME NTAL P ROT E,CT I ON AGENCY (US EP A) . 1984o. Updated
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity Assessment of Cadmium.
(Review Draft) . USEPA, Office of Health and Environmental
Assessment. Washington, D.C. April 1984. EPA -600/8-83-
0 25 B
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL, PROTECTION AGENCY (USEPA). 1984c . Air
Quality Criteria for Lead (Review Draft) a USEPA, Environ-
mental Criteria and Assessment Office. Res ea rc h 'Triangle
Pa rk, N.C. Sep,temr>er 1984. EPA 600/8-83-028B
M.B.-TORWORM
HEALTH AND ENVIRDNMENTAL EFFECTS OF CHEMICALS,
OF CONCERN AT THE SMUGGLER MDUNTA,IN SITE
A. Health Effects
1. Arsenic
Effects® Acute poisoning
of humans with arsenic may result in gastrointestinal effects,
hemolysis, and neuropathy. Chronic exposure causes character-
istic toxic effects on the peripheral nervous system and, in
children, effects on the central nervous system. Keratosis,
hyperpigmentation, and possibly precancerous dermal lesions,
and cardiovascular injury are frequently observed sequelae
of chronic exposure to arsenic--. Arsenic has been found to
be embryotoxic, fetotoxic, and teratogenic in several animal
species, but its ability to induce malformations in humans
is less well substantiated® Arsenic induces chromosome aber-
rations and impairs DNA repair, but it has not been shown to
be a point mutagen. Epidemiology studies have shown that inha-
lation of arsenic is strongly associated with cancer of the
lung and perhaps with hepatic angiosarcoma, while exposure by
ingestion has been linked to a characteristic form of dermal
cancer. Although arsenic's potential as a human carcinogen
has long been recognized, it is only recently that its carcino-
genicity has been demonstrated in animal models. In general,
the trivalent form of arsenic is more toxic than the pentavalent
form (USEPA 1980) .
1
IR
Current Criteria. To estimate an ambient water quality
criterion for arsenic, EPA (USEPA 1980a) used the data obtained
in Taiwan by Tseng et al. (1968). The Weibull model was used
to relate skin cancer incidence, age, and level of exposure in
the drinking water. In 37 villages that had been obtaining
drinking water from artesian wells with various levels of arsenic
contamination for 45 years, 40,421 individuals were examined
for hyperpigmentation, keratosis, skin cancer, and blackfoot
disease (in which impaired peripheral circulation leads to
gangrene). Also, the local well waters were analyzed for arsenic
concentration. Correlations of cancer incidence with the local
arsenic concentrations and with age (duration of exposure)
were found. Extrapolation to -low dose levels from the fitted
Weibull model gave 2.2 ng/liter arsenic (inclusive for triva-
lent and pentavalent inorganic and organic arsenic) as the
concentration predicted to be associated with a lifetime risk
of cancer of 10-6. The CAG (USEPA 1980a) unit risk at age 75
was 0.405 ppm -1,, equivalent to a concentration of 2.5 ng/liter
in drinking water for a risk of 10-6.
New Information. The ambient water quality criterion for
arsenic based upon the epidemiology study of Tseng et al. (1968),
has recently been criticized by Calabrese (1983). He faulted
the study itself for failing to determine which arsenic compounds
were present or to consider other contaminants in the drinking
water (noting the possible relevance of ergot alkaloids).
Calabrese questioned the results of the low-dose extrapolation
0
procedures by pointing out that a risk of 10-6 from 2®2 ppt
(ng/liter) arsenic was derived from the incidence of skin cancer
in, the Taiwanese population exposed to arsenic in the 300-600 ppb
range. 'By the linear extrapolation assumption used, this is
equivalent to saying the expected risk of this type of skin
cancer would be 10-3 from exposure to 2 ppb, the average level
of arsenic in drinking water in the United States, but this
has not been observed. Layton et al. (1983) conducted a risk
assessment on arsenic in drinking water and concluded that
concentrations up to 100 Vg/ liter would not pose a threat to
human health.
More recent epidemiology studies add further support to
the association between 'ingestion of arsenic in drinking water
(at concentrations of approximately 1 ppm) and skin cancer
(Astolfi et al. 1981) and between inhalation exposure to arsenic
and lung cancer (e.g., Lee -Feldstein 1983, Enterline and Marsh
1982). Several new laboratory studies have contributed evidence
that arsenic has potential as an animal, as well as human,
carcinogen (Ishinishi et al. 1983, Shirachi et al. 1983).
one hypothetical explanation of the wide differences among
the results of studies of the carcinogenic potential of arsenic
is differences in the chemical form of the arsenic.
OSHA (1983) conducted a risk assessment of arsenic in the
workplace® Its calculations were based upon data from epidemi-
ology studies of the incidence of lung cancer among workers
exposed occupationally (largely by inhalation) to arsenic.
3
The derived unit, risk was B x 10 -4 ([.g/m3)-lm Assuming equal
absorption by the inhalation and oral routes of exposure, this
estimate of carcinogenic, potency would imply a lifetime cancer
risk of 10®6 from consumption of drinking water containing
3.7 ng/liter arsenic or more generally, from the ingestion
of a dose of 0.1 ng/kg/day for the lifetime of the individual®.
This estimate would apply specifically to trivalent inorganic
arsenic.
Arsenic's carcinogenic potential in humans has been amply
demonstrated. The quantitative estimates of dose -response
derived from Tseng et al. (1968) upon which the 1980 ambient
water quality criterion was based have, been disputed, but they
are quite concordant with other estimates of arsenic's carcino-
genic potency derived from the epidemiology data based on inha-
lation exposure PSHA 1983). Uncertainty about the chemical
form of the arsenic in the water supply studied by Tseng et al.
(1968) may limit the applicability of the risk assessment to
other situations. The OSHA risk assessment would be applicable
to trivalent inorganic arsenic.
2. Barium
Qualitative Descri2tion of Health Effects. Barium readily
forms insoluble salts in the presence of carbonate and sulfate
anions. Very insoluble salts of barium such as barium sulfate
are essentially nontoxic, by ingestion because only minimal
4
amounts are absorbed by the body (ACGIH 1980). Barium carbonate
and more soluble barium compounds are quite toxic to humans.
0
Doses of barium carbonate and 'barium chloride of 57 mg/kg and
12 mg/kg, respectively, were fatal when ingested by humans.
Toxic effects of ingestion include gastroenteritis, muscular
paralysis, ventricular fibrillation, and central nervous system
effects® Inhalation of barium sulfate or barium carbonate dust
causes baritosis, a benign, pneumoconiosis in occupationally
exposed workers. This effect is reversible upon cessation of
exposure. A more detailed description of the toxicity of barium
and barium compounds can be found in several sources (NAS 1977;
Hammond and Beliles 1980; Stokinger 1981). No information on
the carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, mutagenicity, or chronic
toxicity of barium compounds was found in the literature reviewed.
Current Criteria® The OSHA Standard and the ACGIH Threshold
Limit Value are both 0.5 mg/m 3, for soluble compounds of barium
(NIOSH 1984). This level is based on the exposure to barium
nitrate that was tolerated for several years by workers at
Los Alamos National Laboratory (Stokinger 1981). Conversion
of dose received by inhalation of this concentration to a drinking
water level and revision for susceptible populations was used
to determine the EPA interim Primary Drinking Water Regulation
for barium of 1 mg/liter.
Analysis of Current Criteria. Based on the limited infor—
mation on the toxicity of barium and the fact that barium is
readily eliminated from the body, the present criteria appear
to be sufficient to protect human health.
9
3. Cadmium
Qualitative Description of Health Effects. Treatment of
laboratory animals with cadmium by injection results in injection -
site sarcomas and testicular tumors of the Leydig cells, but the
relationship between human exposure to cadmium and cancer of
the prostate, lung, or kidney, as suggested by several epidemi-
ology studies, has yet to be firmly established. Furthermore,
cadmium has not been shown to be mutagenic, although it may
impair DNA repair. Cadmium is a well -studied animal teratogen,
but similar potential in humans has not been convincingly demon-
strated.
Cadmium bioaccumulates, particularly in the kidney and
liver. Epidemiology studies have shown nonmalignant pulmonary
diseases to be associated with inhalation of cadmium. Renal
tubular dysfunction, of which the first sign is proteinuria,
occurs at even lower levels of oral or inhalation exposure
to cadmium and may be the primary defect responsible for the
bone damage seen in Itai-Itai disease. Chronic exposure of
humans to, cadmium is also suspected to produce hypertension,
anemia, sensory loss (particularly smell), endocrine altera-
tions, and immunosuppression (USEPA 1980b).
Current Criterion. EPA (USEPA 1980b) established an ambient
water quality criterion for cadmium of 10 dig/liter on the basis
of the "generally accepted" estimate of 200 µg/g wet weight
of cadmium in the renal cortex as the critical concentration
for renal toxicity.Friberg et al. (1974) estimated that daily
6
ingestion of 250-350 [ig cadmium over 50 years would result in
such, renal concentrations. The amount of cadmium that drink-
ing water would contribute to this concentration under various
exposure scenarios was found to be small (0.53-7.6%) compared
to other sources of exposure (occupational, food, smoking, and
ambient air). it was therefore determined that the existing
drinking water standard for cadmium of 10 fag/liter was adequate
to protect against health effects from ingestion of cadmium.
New Information. In a bioassay in which male Wistar rats
were exposed to cadmium chloride aerosols 23 hours/day at con-
centrations of 12.5, 25, and 50 �Lg/m 3 for 18 months, Takenaka
et al. (1983) found a highly significant dose -response rela-
tionship in the incidence of lung carcinomas over the controls
and three treatment groups: 0/38, 6/39,,20/33, and 25/35,
respectively. This represents a very marked response which
certainly has implications for risk assessments for airborne
cadmium. In another recent study, T'hun et al. (1984) showed a
significant excess of lung cancer deaths among a group of cad-
mium smelter workers. This finding may be somewhat confounded
by effects of smoking and exposure to arsenic, but USEPA (1984)
concluded that neither was sufficient to explain the observed
effect. Like the injection site sarcomas and Leydigomas reported
previously, these lung carcinomas might be interpreted as car-
cinogenic responses only in the directly exposed tissue. The
question remains of whether a systemic carcinogenic response
following exposure to cadmium by ingestion could be predicted.
V]
USEPA (1984) based its quantitative risk assessment for
inhaled cadmium on the epidemiological study by Thun et al.
(1984) and performed a risk assessment on the rat study of
Takenaka et al. (1983) to support the derived unit risk. The
best estimate of the exposure and response of the exposed popu-
lation from the Thun et al. (1984) study gave rise to a unit
risk estimate of 2.3x10-3 (fig/m3)-1, which equals an excess
risk of cancer of 106 associated with lifetime exposure to a
concentration of 0.4 ng/ m 3 in the air. Calculations performed
by USEPA (1984) using the Takenaka et al. (1983) data indicated
a unit risk of 0.156 (fig/m3)-1, or a risk factor approximately
2'orders of magnitude higher. Given the limitations of avail-
able data, this quantitative risk assessment appears reasonable
and the use of the unit risk of 2.3x10-3 (fig/m 3 appears,
valid for cadmium exposure by inhalation.
Hughey et al® (1984) reported that treatment of male Wistar
rats for only 24 weeks with 50 ppm cadmium in the drinking
water produced clear symptoms of nephritis when the accumulated
renal concentration of cadmium was 60 Vg/g w.w. This suggests
that the present ambient water quality criterion of 10 �9/liter
may be less conservative than originally believed and that
the current standard for cadmium should be revised downward.
It suggests that the threshold tissue concentration for adverse
effects on the kidney should be 60 gg/g rather than 200 µ9/9,
in which case the threshold daily intake would be 75-105 Vg/day
rather than 250-350 µg as suggested by Fr"iberg et al. (1974).
N
4 Copper
ual native �escriaticr� of Health Effects. Copper does
not appear to be carcinogenic, mutagenic, or teratogenic and
is not toxic at low levels (USEPA 1980c). In general, more
attention is, given to the problems associated with copper defi-
ciency than to problems of excess copper. only levels much
higher than those present in the environment are considered
toxic. Further information on copper is available in USEPA
(1980c), NAS (1977), Hammond and Beliles (1980), and Stokinger
(1981).
Current Criteria. The current Ambient Water Quality Criteria
(USEPA 1980c) is 1 mg/liter based on organoleptic quality rather
than toxicity® Th,e OSHA standard and the ACGIH Threshold Limit
Value for inhalation exposurewereboth 1.0 mg/m 3.
Anal The present criteria appear
sufficient to protect human health adequately.
5. Lead
Evaluation of Health Effects® Lead has been shown to
be teratogenic in a number of animal studies and caused an
increased incidence of stillbirths and miscarriages in occupa-
tionally exposed women (USEPA 19804). The reported level of
lead in the air in, the epidemiologic study was 75 �g/m 3 , for
an approximate dose of 0.025 mg/kg/day. Renal dysfunction
has been associated with blood lead levels as low as 40 µg/ dl
with the renal changes being produced at a number of sites
in the kidney.
9
The major effects caused by exposure to lead are toxicity
to the hematopoietic system and neurological effects® Heme
synthesis is inhibited by the effects of lead on a number of
steps in the biosynthetic pathway. Specifically, lead stimu-
lates, delta -aminolevulinic acid synthetase (ALA - S) and therefore
increase the production of del-ta-aminoleuvulinic acid (ALA),
it inhibits the activity of delta-aminoleuvilinic acid dehydra-
tase (ALA -D) and therefore decreases the production of porphoro-
bilinogen from ALA, and finally, lead inhibits the insertion
of iron into protoporphyrin to form heme. No threshold has
been found for this effect on heme production. Decreased heme
production caused by lead is important for its effect on the
erythropoietic system because it can cause anemia due to decreased
hemoglobin production. Decreased heme production can have
deleterious effects on other heme-containing proteins, such
as cytochrome P-450 which functions in the body to detoxify
certain chemicals®
The neurotoxic effects associated with exposure to lead
are of two types. Blood lead levels of over 80 µg/ dl in children
and over 100 �Lg/dl in sensitive adults can cause severe irrevers-
ible brain damage, encephalopathy and possibly death. Persons
with these high levels may be asymptomatic or show only slight
signs of intoxication but rapid deterioration can occur and
in children permanent learning disabilities are seen at these
levels even if no overt symptoms of lead poisoning are observed."
out
Although exposure to high lead levels has very severe
neurological effects, exposure of children and pregnant women
to low levels of lead may also cause significant neurotoxicity.
Children and fetuses with blood, levels of lead of 30 µg/ dl
and lower, may suffer significant neurobehavioral deficits.
This would be manifested in a slight, but potentially very
important decrease in learning ability for an affected child.
This type of effect is toxicologically very important because
there may not be an actual threshold dose below which an effect
would not occur. The permanently impaired learning ability
associated with such low level exposure may be impossible to
detect clinically.
Current Criteria. The OSHA Standard for lead in air is
50 11q1M 3 ; the NIOSH Recommended Standard is 100 4g/m3, and
the ACGIH Threshold Limit Value is 150 fig/ m3"Phe standard
for ambient air is 1.5 [Lg/m3`Phe USEPA Interim Primary Drinking
Water Standard and Ambient Water Quality Criteria are both
50 �Lg/liter (USEPA 1980d, 47 FR 10998 1982).
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) currently defines
"lead toxicity" in a child as a blood lead level >30 [.g/dl
and an erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP) >50 g/ dl.. However,
CDC is presently revising its criteria for lead toxicity to
blood lead levels >25 gg/dl and EP >35 �g/dl (Schilling et
a,l. 1984).
Analysis of Current Criteria. The standards for lead
in air all appear sufficient to protect against severe toxico-
M
logical effects in workers. The standard for ambient air is
probably sufficient to protect against severe effects of lead
toxicity but may not provide an adequate margin of safety to
protect against insidious neurotoxic effects. The standards
for drinking water also seem sufficient to protect against
severe health hazards.
6. Manganese
ualitative �escr tion of health Effects® Toxic effects
of manganese have been studied primarily in workers exposed
by inhalation to manganese -containing dust. Exposure to high
levels of manganese causes pneumonitis in exposed workers.
More importantly, chronic exposure has been associated with
neurological effects similar, -to Parkinson's disease with signs
and symptoms including speech disturbancest a masklike face,
tremors, difficulty in walking, and sexual disturbance (Stokinger
1981). The disease, manganism, is progressive, first manifested
as increased irritability, difficulty in walking, unusual 'behavior,
and speech disturbances before progressing to the more serious
and not completely reversible condition resembling Parkinson's
disease. Although exposure in these cases was by inhalation,
approximately 60% of the manganese that is inhaled is subsequently
coughed up and swallowed and then may be absorbed through the
lining of the gut. One case study reported apparent manganism
associated with extremely high levels of manganese in a drinking
water well, further suggesting that ingestion, as well as inhala-
tion, is an important route of exposure. Chronic exposure
M
to manganese also causes increased production of erythrocytes,
with consequent increases in hemoglobin values and erythrocyte
counts®
Current Criteria. The OSHA standard and the ACGIH Thres-
hold Limit Value for manganese dust are both 5 mg/ m 3 in, the
air, corresponding to approximately 1 mg/kg/day for man.
Analysis of Current Criteria. The current, criteria are
based on a lowest observed effect level (LOEL) of 30 mg/m 3
for chronic manganese toxicity by inhalation and therefore
have a safety factor of less than one order of magnitude®
However, no adverse effects have been seen at this level, and
therefore it is probably sufficient to prevent toxic effects
in humans exposed to airborne manganese. Undesirable taste
and discoloration of the water occur at concentrations greater
than 0.05 mg/ liter and should prevent ingestion of toxic levels
of manganese, but it clearly did not in the Kawamura et al.
(1941 in NAS 1973) study. As no water concentrations were
presented with this study, a maximum total dose level of 0.5
mg/kg/day is determined from the inhalation studies to be ade-
quate to prevent toxic effects in humans.
7. Mercury
Evaluation of Health Effects® Mercury caused cerebral
palsy and microcephalus in children of women consuming mercury
contaminated fish and caused cleft palate and hydrocephalus
in a mouse teratology study (Shepard 1980). A decrease in male
fertility was seen in mice administered a single intraperitoneal
HE
dose of 1 mg/kg of methylmercury hydroxide. Morphological
changes in the kidneys were reported in rats fed 0.5 ppm of
mercuric chloride in their diet for 2 years, a dose of approxi-
mately 0.025 mg/kg/day. The primary effect associated with
exposure to mercury is neurotoxicity to both the, central and
peripheral nervous system. Histopathological changes have
been seen in monkeys administered doses as low as 0.03 mg/kg/day
for four months and observed for an additional 6 months (Sato
and Ikuta 1977). occupational exposure to mercury vapor has
been associated with neurological effects in humans at concen-
trations of 0.1 mg/ m 3 for mercury vapor and at lower concentra-
tions for alkyl mercury compounds.
The toxicity of mercury depends to some extent on its
form. Organic mercury compounds such as the alkyl mercuric,
chemicals are generally more neurotoxic than inorganic mercury.
In addition, the different forms of mercury can cause somewhat
different neurotoxic effects initially, although both will
elicit the same effects at higher doses. Mercury vapor generally
causes neuropsychiatric effects such as emotional instability
and tremors which increase in severity with increasing duration
of exposure. Alkyl mercury causes tremors but also causes
sensory effects at low levels of exposure and motor effects
such as incoordination at somewhat higher levels®
Current Criteria. The OSHA Standard for mercury vapor
is 0.1 mg/ M 3 as a ceiling level. The ACGIH Threshold Limit
Values for mercury are 0.01 mg/ m 3 for alkyl compounds, 0.05
W'_
for mercury vapor, and 0.1 mg/m3 for inorganic compounds (NIOSH
1984). The USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for human
health was 10 µg/Liter based solely on drinking water and not
on consuming fish (USEPA 1980e). The Iterim Primary Drinking
Water Standard for mercury is 2 �.q/liter (47 FR 10998 1982) .
Analysis of Current Criteria. The ACGIH Threshold Limit
Values provide only a small margin of safety but appears to be
sufficiently low to protect human health. The OSHA Standard is,
apparently high as exposure to mercury vapor at the level of
the standard has been associated with toxic effects in workers.
The Ambient Water Quality Criteria (10 µg/ liter) and the Interim
Primary Drinking Water Standard (2 µg/liter) give doses of
approximately 3 gg/kg/ day and -0.6 pg/kg/day, respectively.
These criteria appear to be sufficient to protect human health.
8. Zinc
Evaluation of Health Effects. Zinc is an essential element
in the body and more problems have been associated with zinc
deficiencies than with excess concentrations. However, zinc
does exhibit some toxic effects at high levels. Skin and eye
irritation are produced by contact with high concentrations
of zinc chloride. In a study on rats, ingestion of 0.25% zinc
in the diet (providing a dose of approximately 125 mg/kg/day)
produced growth retardation; hypochromic anemia, and defective
mineralization of bone. Dietary levels less than 0.25% had
no effect in the same study. The ACGIH Threshold Limit Value
for zinc oxide dust is 10 ng/m 3 as a nuisance particulate.
15
The USEPA Ambient Drinking Water Criteria and Secondary Drinking
Water Standard are both 5 mg/liter based on organoleptic qualities
(USEPA 1980f, 40 CFR 141).
Anal The current criteria appear
to be sufficient to prevent human health hazards due to exposure
to zinc.
Based on the levels reported at the site, zinc is unlikely
to pose a health hazard to people living near the Smuggler
Mine. More importantly, zinc is known to interact with other,
metals present at the site such as cadmium and lead. Cadmium
exposure appears to cause zinc to concentration preferentially
in certain parts of the body and there is information that at
least some of the toxic effects associated with exposure to
cadmium may be caused by zinc - deficiency. Increased zinc uptake
may alleviate these effects. Specifically, increased zinc
concentrations tend to decrease or, prevent the renal toxicity
associated with cadmium exposure and also decrease the terato-
genic effect of cadmium. Zinc has been shown to decrease the
uptake of ingested lead with the interaction apparently occuring
in the gut. Zinc also apparently prevents or decreases the
inhibition by lead of red blood cell enzyme ALA dehydratase.
However, zinc may interact with lead to decrease levels of
serum iron and cause anemia (USEPA 1980f).
w
B. Toxicity to Wildlife
1® Arsenic
various inorganic forms of arsenic appear to have similar
levels of toxicity; they all seem to be much more toxic than
organic forms. Acute toxicity to adult freshwater animals
occurs at levels of arsenic trioxide as low as 812 pg/liter
and at levels as low as 40 jig/liter in early life stages of
aquatic organisms® Arsenic toxicity does not appear to increase
greatly with chronic exposure, and it, does not seem that arsenic
is bioconcentrated to a great degree®
Arsenic poisoning is a rare but not uncommon toxic syndrome
among domestic animals. Arsenic causes hyperemia and edema
of the gastrointestinal tract, hemorrhage of the cardiac serosal
surfaces and peritoneum, and pulmonary congestion and edema;
and it may cause liver necrosis. Information on arsenic toxicity
to terrestrial wildlife was not reported in the literature
reviewed.
2. Barium
Adequate data for characterization of toxicity to wildlife
and domestic animals are not available.
3. Cadmium
The acute LC 50 for freshwater fish and invertebrates gener-
ally ranged from 100 to 1,000 jig/liter; salmonids are much
more sensitive than other organisms. Chronic tests have been
performed and show that cadmium has cumulative toxicity and
17
acute --chronic ratios that range of from 66 to 431. B ioconcen-
tration factors were generally less than 1,000 but were as
high as 10,000 for some freshwater fish species.
No adverse effects on domestic or wild animals were reported
in the studies reviewed.
4. Copper
Mean acute toxicity values for a large number of freshwater
animals range from 7.2 µg/liter for 1aphnia pulicaria to 10,200
µg/liter for the bluegill. Toxicity tends to decrease as hard-
nesst alkalinity, and total organic carbon increase. Chronic
values for a variety of freshwater species range from 3.9 dig/liter
for brook trout to 60.4 µg/liter for northern pike. Hardness
does not appear to affect chronic toxicity. The acute -chronic
ratios for different species range from 3 to 156® The more
sensitive species tend to have lower ratios than the less sensi-
tive species. In addition, the ratio seems to increase with
hardness.,
Sheep are very susceptible to copper toxicosis and poisoning
may be acute or chronic. Acute poisoning is caused by direct
action of copper salts on the gastrointestinal tract, resulting
in gastroenteritis, shock, and death. The toxic dose is about
20 mg/kg and is usually obtained through an accidental overdose
of an antihelminthic. Ingestion of excess copper over a long
period of time results in absorption and accumulation of copper
by the liver. This type of chronic cumulative poisoning may
suddenly develop into an acute hemolytic crisis. Copper intake
WE
of 1.5 g/day for 30 days is known to be fatal for many breeds,
of sheep. Excessive copper may be stored in the liver as a
result of excess copper ingestion, as a consequence of impaired
liver function, or in connection with a deficiency or excess
of other trace elements. Sheep eliminate accumulated copper
very slowly after cessation of exposure.
Cattle are much more resistant to copper in the diet than
sheep® Copper toxicity in ruminants can be counteracted by
inclusion of molybdenum, zinc, and sulfate in the diet.
5. Lead
Freshwater vertebrates and invertebrates are more sensitive
to lead in soft water than in hard water® At a hardness of
about 50 mg/liter CaCO3, the median effect concentrations for
nine families range from 140 jig/liter to 236,600 pg/liter.
Chronic values for 2.2�p is magna and the rainbow trout are
12.26 jig/liter and 83.08 jig/liter, respectively, at a hardness
of about 50 mg/liter. Acute -chronic ratios calculated for
three freshwater species ranged from 18 to 62. Bioconcentration
factors, ranging from 42 for young brook trout to 1,700 for
a snail, were reported. Freshwater algae show an inhibition
of growth at concentrations above 500 jig/ liter.
Although lead is known to occur in the tissue of many
free-living wild animals, including birds, mammals, fishes,
and invertebrates, reports of poisoning usually involve waterfowl.
There is evidence that lead, at concentrations occasionally
found near roadsides and smelters, can eliminate or reduce
We
populations of bacteria and fungi on leaf surfaces and in soil.
Many of these microorganism play key roles in the decomposer
food chain.
Cases of lead poisoning have been reported for a variety
of domestic animals, including cattle, horses, dogs, and cats.
Several types of anthropogenic sources are cited as the source
of lead in these reports® Because of their curiosity and their
indiscriminate eating habits, cattle experience the greatest
incidence of lead toxicity among domestic animals.
6. Manqanese
Adequate data for characterization of the, toxicity of
manganese to wildlife or domestic animals are not available.
A 48-hour LC 50 value of 16 mg/ liter of manganese is
reported for embryos of the oyster Crassostrea virgi.nica.
For the softshell clam Mya.arenaria a 168 -hour LC 50, value of
300 mg/ liter is reported.
7. Mercury
The toxicity of mercury compounds has been tested in a
wide variety of aquatic organisms. Although methylmercury
appears to be more toxic than inorganic mercuric salts, few
acute or chronic toxicity tests have been conducted with it.
Among freshwater species, the 96 -hour LC 50 values for inorganic
mercuric salts range from 0.02 pg/liter for crayfish to 2,000 Vg/
liter for caddisfly larvae. Acute values for methylmercuric
compounds and other mercury compounds are only available for
MO
fishes. In rainbow trout, methyl -mercuric chloride is about
ten times more toxic to rainbow trout than mercuric chloride,
which is acutely toxic at about 300 Vg/liter at 10 degrees
Celsius. Methylmercury is the most chronically toxic of the
tested compounds, with chronic values for Daphnia mac3na and
brook trout of 1.00 and 0.52 jig/liter, respectively.The acute -
chronic ratio for 22pLiis maw is 3.2.
Chronic dietary exposure of chickens to mercuric chloride
at growth inhibitory levels causes immune suppression, with
a differential reduction effect on specific immunoglobulins.
Zinc produces acute toxicity in freshwater organisms over
a range of concentrations from 90 to 58,100 jig/liter and appears
to be less toxic in harder water. Acute toxicity is similar
for freshwater fish and invertebrates. chronic toxicity values
range from 47 to 852 [,g/ liter and appear to be relatively unaf-
fected by hardness. A Final Acute -Chronic Ratio for freshwater
species of 3.0 has been reported. Although most freshwater
plants appear to be insensitive to z i inc, one species, the alga
Selenastrum ca2ricornutum, exhibited toxic effects at concen-
trations from 30 to 700 jig/liter.
Zinc poisoning has occurred in cattle. In one outbreak,
poisoning was caused by food accidentally contaminated with
zinc at a concentration of 20 g/kg. An estimated intake of
140 g of zinc per cow per day for about 2 days was reported.
The exposed cows exhibited severe enteritis, and some died
01
or had to be slaughtered® Postmortem findings showed severe
pulmonary emphysema with changes in the myocardium, kidneys,
and liver. Zinc concentrations in the liver were extremely
high. Based on relatively limited data, some researchers have
speculated that exposure to excessive amounts of zinc may cons-
titute a hazard to horses. Laboratory studies and findings
in foals living near lead -zinc smelters suggest that excessive
exposure, to zinc may produce bone changes, joint afflictions,
and lameness. In pigs given dietary zinc at concentrations
greater than 1,000 mg/kg, decreased food intake and weight
gain were observed. At dietary levels greater than 2,000 mg/kg,
deaths occurred as soon as 2 weeks after exposure. Severe
gastrointestinal changes and brain damage, both of which were
accompanied by, hemorrhages, were observed, as well as changes
in the joints. High concentrations of zinc were found in the
liver.
22