Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGM.scoring accepting.park.place READING ON DRAFT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO ACCEPTING THE ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMISSION RECOMMENDED SCORING OF THE PARK PLACE COMMERCIAL PARKING GARAGE GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPLICATION, 707 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN TO: THRU: FROM: RE: DATE: MEMORANDUM Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners Lance Clarke, Deputy Community Development Director, Pitkin County Chris Bendon, Senior Long Range Planner, City of Aspen Park Place Commercial Parking Garage - 707 East Hyman Ave., Aspen Acceptance of Growth Management Commission Scoring December 3, 2003 SUMMARY: Hyrnan Avenue Holdings, LLC, represented by Stan Clauson Associates, LLC, is requesting the City of Aspen grant land use approvals to construct a 99-space commercial parking facility.with an accessory office and two (2) affordable housing units. The parcel is i2,000 square feet consisting of Lots A, B, C and D of Block 105, City and Townsite of Aspen, and is located in the Office (O) Zone District. The property is currently developed with an "A-Frame" structure, 707 East Hyman, and the "Hannah-Dustin'' building, 300 So. Spring. Both are currently office buildings. No changes are proposed for the Hannah Dustin Building. The commercial parking facility is proposed to replace the 950 square foot A-Frame. Th~ parking operation is proposed as an entirely automated system. Cars are placed on "pallets" and then mechanically moved within the building. No internal ramping is involved and drivers do not actually enter the garage. A small office houses an attendant Who aids patrons with the system. The GMQS process requires scoring by the Growth Management Commission (GMC). Projects must achieve minimum "threshold" scores in various categories in order to proceed. The GMC reviewed this project and assigned a passing score to each of the scoring criteria (scoring summary attached). The process now requires acceptance of the scoring by both City Council and the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners, then granting of the allotments by the Aspen City Council. The BOCC is being asked to accept the scoring assigned by the GMC. In the alternative, the BOCC can choose to not accept the scoring and the applicant can appeal that decision to a joint City Council/BOCC hearing. Staff recommends the BOCC adopt Resolution. No. , Series of 2003. Park Place memo page 1 APPLICANT: Hyman Avenue Holdings, LLC. Represented by Stan Clauson, AICP LOCATION~ LOT SIZE~ ZONING: 707 East Hyman Avenue. The parcel is I2,000 square feet consisting of Lots A, B, C mad D of Block 105, City and Townsite of Aspen, and is located in the Office (O) Zone District. I~ROPOSED LAND USE: Hannah/Dustin building (west building) - Office (also current use) A-Frame (east building) - Commercial parking, affordable housing, accessory office. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Growth Management Scoring - Section 26. 470, Aspen Land Use Code. Actions required for approval of allotments. "Since the Growth Management Quota System applies throughout the Aspen Metro Area, no growth management allocation shall be awarded unless the City Council and Board of County Commissioners both accept the recommendation Of the Growth Management Commission." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of BOCC Resolution No. , Series of 2003. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Resolution No. , Series of 2003." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Proposed Resolution and Scoring Summary Exhibit B - Development Application Park Place memo page 2 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, ACCEPTING THE ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMISSION RECOMMENDED SCORING OF THE PARK PLACE COMMERCIAL PARKING GARAGE GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPLICATION, 707 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN. Resolution No. -2003 RECITALS On November I 1, 2003, the Asper~Pitkin County Growth Managemem Conm~ission ("the GMC") held a duly noticed public hearing at which time evidence mhd testimony was presented with respect to the Park Place Corm,nercial Parking Garage Growth Management application. 2. The Park Place Commercial Parking Garage Growth Management Application is a development application received by the City of Aspen Community Development Department from Hyman Avenue Holdings, LLC, Joba~ Cooper Managing Partner, owner and applicant, represented by Stan Clauson Associates, LLC, for a Groxvth Management allocation of 4,000 square feet of net leasable space for a proposed ~ommercial parking facility housing ninety-nine cars, two affordable housing units, an accessory parking attendant office, and an existing office building. The parcel is described as Lots A, B, C, and D, Block 105, City and Towntsite of Aspen, Pitkin Comhty, Colorado, also described as the Hannah-Dustin Condominiums according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 17 at Page 78 Pitkin County Cleric mhd Recorder. The parcel is currently developed with an "A-Frame" structure, 707 East Hyman Avenue, generally located on Lots C and D, and the "Hannah-Dustin" building, 300 So. Spring Street, generally located on Lots A and B. Both are currently office buildings. Minimal changes are proposed for the Hannah Dustin Building and site. The commercial parking facility is proposed to replace the A-Frame; and, The GMC scored the application pursuant to the criteria for commercial and office development, Section 26.470.100 of the Aspen Land Use Code. The Commission assigned scores meeting and exceeding the minimmn' threshold scores necessary for commercial growth management allotment and said scores are attached as Attachment A of this documeut. Pm'suant to Section 26.470 of the Aspen Land Use Code, both the City Council and the Pitkin County Board of County Co~ranissioners must accept the scoring assigned by the GMC in order for the City Council to award growth management development allotments. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners that it does hereby accept the assigned scoring of the Park Place Commercial Parking Garage Growth Management application. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE [signatures on following page] day of ,2003. Resolution No. -2003 Page 2 ATTEST: Lyndee R. Dean Clerk to the BOCC APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jolm Ely, County Attorney Attachment A - GMC Scoring BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO By. Jack Hatfield, Chainnan Date APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Cindy Houben. Community Development Director Eric Cohen, Chair 11 7 Roger Haneman t2 6 Ruth 13 8 son 11 6 John Rowland 8 7 Steve Skadron 10 5 Peter Martin 11 8 · Mike Augello 9 7 Peter Thomas 8 7 John Howard 9 7 18 14 18 14 21 14 17 t4 15 14 15 14 19 14 16 14 15 14 16 14 Average Score 10.2 6.8 17.0 14.0 Threshold 7.2 4.0 18.8 9.0 Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass 12 7 19 14 12 6 18 14 13 8 21 14 12 7 19 14 8 7 15 14 10 '5 15 14 12 8 20 14 10 7 17 14 8 7 15 14 9 7 16 14 0.0 10.6 6.9 17.5 14.0 7.2 4.0 16.8 9.0 Pass Pass Pass Pass 0.0 Scoring Categories A - Quality of Design. 18 points avaialble. B - Availability of Public Facilities and Services. 10 points available. C - Provision of Affordable Housing. 15 points available D - Bonus points. 4 points available. Minimum Scoring Thresholds A - 40% of available points B - 40% of available points A+B - 60% of available points C - 60% of available points D - no minimum. APPLICATION Park Place - Commercial parking Facility 15 September 2003 Applicant: Hyman Avenue Holdings, LLC Location: 707 East Hyman Avenue in Aspen (P1D# 2737-182-27-001) Zone District: Office District .4 Growth Management Application for Commercial and Office Development Represented-by: Stan Clauson Associates, LLC 200 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 970-925-2323 Chris Bendon, Aspen Community Development Departmem 15 Septeraber 2003 Page 2 This project has previously gone through Sketch Plan Review pursuant to Section 26.304.060 B2 of the Aspen Land Use Code on 21 October 2002, at which time the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council had an opportunity to preview the project and provide comments. It is also in the process of being heard by the Planning & Zoning Commission for its Conditional PUD and related approvals. Several supplementary reports recently provided to the P&Z, but not in the original application, are provided as appendices to this application. These include a traffic study and noise analysis. The 1986 Aspen/Pitkin County Transit/Transportation Development Plan, which supports parking development in this area, has not been included here. Please refer to the Conditional PUD application for this document. The proposed Park Place Commercial Parking Facility will bring the subject property into compatibility with the mixed use development that has occurred in the neighborhood. The property is currently under-utilized and without streetscape amenities along Hymun Avenue. Moreover, surface parking on the property adds a chaotic appeamn~ to the are~ The proposed facility would correct these issues, while the entire downtown core would benefit from additional parking in this location. The parking facility will reduce demand for the limited on-street parking in Aspen and will compensate for employee generation by incorporating two affordable remal units. We look forward to an opportunity to presem this application, which we believe will enhance the downtown Aspen experience for tourists and residents alike. We remain ready to answer any questions that you or the review boards may have regarding the application. Very truly yours, A SO ,A S, Attachments: A. Land Use Application Form, Dimensional Requirements Form, Project Overview, and Standards Report B. Traffic Study, prepared by Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig C. Noise Analysis, prepared by Wyle Laboratories D. Vicinity Map E. Property Survey F. Architectural Plans and Elevations G. Landscape Plan H. Architeetaral Rendering I. Letter of Authorization J. Legal Deseription/Proof of Ownership K. Pre-application Conference Summary,'d~/~d 3 June 2003 ATTACHMENT A LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Park place--Co~ Parking Fam]ity 707 East Hyman Avenue; Lots C & D, Block 105, Aspen Townsite (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Address: Phone #: John Cooper, Managing Pa~er; Hyman Avenue Holdings, LLC 402 Midland Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 970 379-3434 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Stan Chuson Associates, LLC Address: 200 East Main Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: 970 925-2323 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): [] cmat~Use [] Conceptu~PUD [] Conceotua~HistodcI)evt. [] Special R~view [] Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) [] Final Historic Development [] GMQS Allotment . [] Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) [] Historic Demolition [] GMQS Exemption [] Subdivision [] Historic Desiglmtion [] ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream [] Subdivision Exemption (includes [] Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condraninimnimfion) Expansion Mountain View Plane [] Lot Split [] Temporary Use [] Other: EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing bngdlnSs, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Exkqting property consists of Lots A, B, C, & D; Towusite Block 105. Lots A & B contain an office building, Known as the Hanm~Dustin Building. Lots C & D contain an A-frame structure in office use and sm-Face parking. PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Lots A & B would be subdivided fi~m Lot.s C & D. Lots C & D would be developed as a rack-storage Have you attached the following? [] Pre-Applimfion Conference Sun-amry [] Attaclanent #1, Signed Fce Agreement [] Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form [] Response to Attachment #3; Minlm~ma Submission Coments [] Response to Allaclanem g4, Specific Submission Contents [] Response to gnachment #5, Review Slandards for Your Application FEES DUE: $._2,520.00 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: Park Place - Cqmmercial Parking Facility John Cooper, Mmmging Partner; Hyman Avenue Holdings, LLC 707 Eas~, Hyman Avenue; Lots C & D, Block 105, Aspen Townsite (0) , Lots A, B, C, and D = 12.000 s.f. to be subdivided into 2 lots of 6,000 s.f. each Lots C & D = 6,000 sq, ft. (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Number of residential units: Number of bedrooms: Existing: 927 s. f. Existing: O Existing: 0 Proposed: 4,836 s.f. Proposed.'2 Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): N/A DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 927s;f. Allowable: 6,000s;f. Proposed: 7, 773s;£ Principal.bldg. height: Existing: 20ft. Allowable: 25ft. Proposed: 35fl. Access. bldg. height: Existing: N/A Allowable: 21ft. Proposed: 21ft. On-Siteparking: Existing: 20-30 Required: 6 Proposed: 99 % Site coverage: Existing: N/A Required: N/A Proposed: N/A % Open Space: Existing: N/A Required: N/A Proposed: N/A Front Setback: Existing: 10ft. Required: lOft. Proposed: 6.5 Rear Setback: Existing: 15ft. Required: 14£t. Proposed: Off. Combined F/R: Existing: 25ft. Required: 25ft. Proposed: 6.5 ft. Side Setback: Existing: 5ft. Required: 4{t. .Proposed: 5ft. Side Setback: Existing: 5ft. Required: 5ft. Proposed: 3ft. Combine,dSides: Existing: 10ft. Required: loft. . Proposed: 8ft. Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Parking .areas encroach in setbacks and on Ci _ty.propertv. Variations requested: Floor area, height, front setback rear setback, and side yard setbacks. Project Overview Park Place is a project that will address an essential need for off-street parking in Aspen's commercial core. The Rio Grande parking garage is often fall, while other off-street parking in the business district is limited to private lots or spaces associated with commercial buiklings. · It ~s evidem that parking still remains an issue in Aspen today Park Place is intended to address this issue and offer some relief for the current downtown parking situation~ As part ora 1986 study, the City adopted a plan to alleviate on-street parking by constructing various ' · A ' . facilities that would provide parking and would allow acees spen s commercml core. The Rio Grande parking garage was built as a result of that plan. Although intended as a comprehensive solution with several com4>oln~sy, sto remaining aspects of that plan were never realized, incindin~, th~ . the parking garage within the block surrounded '- -- ~ ,, --v construction ora The proposed Park Place---Commereial Parking Facility is located within this designated btoc~, oy cooper, ~pring, Hymen, and Original. Park P/ace will make 99 parking spaces available near Aspen's commercial core and within walking distance to the Silver Queen Gondola. The facility will be a state-of-the. art facility that will use an automated vertical lift to stack vehicles within an enclosed e ~ar~k~ ~._.~.e~ to ae~c~v.e ~ most. efficient use of space on a available ~----~ *~ o},,~ wm oe avm~ame mr purct~ase, making parking to the owner whenever it is needed. When that space is not utilized, it will become available and rented to the public. Not only will this help to satisfy the parking needs of local business workers and long term visitors, parking congestion in the city limits, but it will relieve on-street As demonstrated in the following GMQS apphcatlon, Park Place will provide an essential community benefit. . The structure will accommodate two deed restricted residential units, with a total of four bedrooms, situated along the streetseape to emphasize components of the surrounding area. The project will also provide a sidewalk aiong the fi.om the residential of the Property, complete with full landscaping and ornamental tree plantings will alleviate a current . This project gap in the pedestrian infrastructure, which will integrate the as part of the neighborhood and create cohesiveness. Park Place Commercial Parking Facility Land Use Code Standards Report 'age f Land Use Code Standard Report Offered below are responses to relevant standards as identified in the Land Use Code: 1. Responses to Section 26.480.080 (C) (1) Development allotment and application procedures a. How the proposed development shall be connected to the public water system, including information on main size and pressure; the excess capacity available in the public water system; the location of the nearest main; and the estimated water demand of the proposed development. Response: The proposed development will connect with the city water system via Hyman Avenue, which according to the City of Aspen Water Department is operating at a pressure of approximately 70 PS1. This is well above the typically required 35 P$1for development in the area The Water Department did not anticipate a problem providing the required water supply to the Park Place project, as the daily demand would be generated from the residential units only and a public restroom available to patrons and employees. b. How the proposed development shall be connected to the public sewage treatment system; the access capacity available in the public sewage treatment system; the nearest location to the building site of a tnmk or connecting sewer line; and the expected sewage treatment demand of the proposed development. Response: Park Place will be connected to the public sewage system located along Hyman Avenue. The applicant will pay any necessary conncction fees associated with the proposed development. The structure will contain two residential units, with a total of foar bathrooms and two kitchens, along with a public rest room serving the office facility. Additionally, drainage frorn parked vehicles will be accommodated with appropriate oil and silt separation. This demand can adequately be accommodated by the existing City of Aspen sewage system. c. The type of drainage system proposed to handle, surface, underground and runoffwaters from the proposed development, and the effect of the development on historic drainage patterns. Response: The Park Place facility will provide drywell drainage systems for building and surface run-off in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineering Department. The building will have a flat roof and cover the greater part of the lot, with no significant effect on drainage patterns in the area. d. The type of fire protection systems to be used (such as hydrants, sprinklers, wet standpipes, etc.); and the distance to the nearest fire station and its average response time). Park Place Commercial Parking Facility Land Use Code Standards Report Page 2 Response: Park Place will be located less than four blocks from the nearest fire station, which means that average response time in case of an emergency will be almost instantaneous. The nearest fire hydrant is located at Hyman Avenue and Spring Street, which is less than 1 O0 feet from the proposed Park Place facility. Internal fire suppression systems will be provided as required by the NFPA and the City Fire Marshall. Standpipes will be provided on site. Construction will be subject to more stringent 3-Hour fire ratings. The interior and exterior walls of the parking structure will be fire proof to meet the standards of the Uniform BmTding Code (UBC), crud afire wall will be placed between the parking area and the residential units. An emergency generator will be installed as part of the system to protect against electrical failure. Approved sprinkler systems, illumination systems, evacuation/roof access, hose bibs, and alarms will be implemented and installed to the satisfaction of the Aspen Fire Protection District. Appropriate ingress/egress will be provided for both residential units as required by the Uniform Building Code. e. The total developmem area of the proposed development, the type of housing development proposed; total number of units and bedrooms, helming employee housing; and a tabular analysis outlining the proposed development's compliance with the dimensional and use requirements of this title. Response: The development will include a Category I, one bedroom rental unit as well as a Category 3, three bedroom rental unit. The dimensional requirements of the units meet the standards of the PUD application submitted for this development. f. The estimated traffic count increase on adjacent sta~ets resulting from the proposed development; and description of the type and condition of roads to serve the proposed development; the total number of vehicles expected to use or be stationed in such development; the hours of principal daily use on adjacem roads; the on- and off-street parking to be supplied to the proposed development; location of alternate transit (bus route, bike paths, etc.); any automobile disincentive techniques incorporated in the proposed development; whether roads or parking areas will be paved; and methods to be used for snow and ice removal on streets and parking lots. Response: It is important to understand that a parkingfacility is not considered a traffic generator, considering people do not designate a parking facility as a point of destinatior~ Traffic generation for the Park Place facility will only result from the affordable ho~tsing components of the project. The total traffic generation is estimated to be less than 5 trips per day per residential unit, which is actually less than is generated by the office space that currently occupies the lot. Trips will be redaced further if these residential units are occupied by employees of Park Place. A traffic analysis has been appended to this applicatior~ Park Place Commercial Parking Facility Land Usc Code Standards Report Page 3 g. The method by which affordable housing will be provided, in conformance with the provisions of the AsperdPitkin County Affordable Housing Guidelines, and a description of the type and amount of housing to be provided. Response: Affordable housing will be provided on site and situated along the streetscape to enhance the residential aspects of the neighborhood. As mentioned above, the Park Place development will include a Category I, one bedroom rental unit as well as a Category 3, three bedroom rental unit. At least one unit is interuted for occupancy by employees of Park Place. Response to Section 26.470.700 Growth Management Scoring Criteria - C~mmercial and office development (C) Criteria. A development application requesting development allotments for commercial or office development shall be assigned points by tho Growth Management Commission pursuant to the following standards and point schedules: 1. Quality of design (msximum eighteen (18) points). Each development shah be rated based on the exterior quality of its buildings and the quality of its site design, and assigned points according to the following standards and considerations: 0 - A totally deficient design 1 - A major design flaw 2 - An acceptable (but standard) design; or 3 - An excellent design The following features shall be rated accordingly: a. Architectural design (maximum three (3) points). Considering the compatibility of the proposed development (in terms of scale, siting, massing, height, and building materials) with existing, neighborhood developments. Response: The proposed Park Place facility was designed to enhance the aesthetic qualities of the neighborhood by incorporating modern architectural features with a variety of materials to compliment existing development of the area. The office and residential units will be built along the facade of the building to enhancing the mixed uses that already exist in the neighborhood Since the utility components of the Park Place facility will be almost entirely hidden from the streetscape, a score of 3 is requested. b. Site design (maximum three (3) points). Considering the quality, character, and appropriateness of the proposed layout, landscaping, and open space areas, the amount of site coverage by buildings, the extent of underground utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation, including access for service, increased safety and privacy, and provision of snow storage areas. Park Place Commercial Parking'Facility Page 4 Land Use Code Standards Report Response: The space required for the parkingfacility allowed no additional square footage for open space. However, the property will be greatly improved by adding a sidewalk with landscaping (including cottonwood trees) along Hyman ~dvenue. .41l utilities will be placed underground and access will be provided from either Hyman Avenue of the rear alley. Snow storage may be accommodated on the adjacent property, hich wdl be formalized in an access agreement. The applicant would request a score of 2for this section. c..Energy conservation (maximum three (3) points). Considering the use of passive and/or active energy conservation techniques in the construction and O pemt~on of the proposed development, including but not limited to insulation, glazing, passive solar orientation, efficient heating and cooling systems and solar energy devices; the extent to which the proposed development avoids wasting energy by excluding excessive lighting and inefficient wood burning devices; and the proposed development's location with regard to the potential for solar gain to result in energy conservation~ Response: The northern orientation of the site does readily lend itself to solar utilization. The residential units will be designed to comply with the Aspen/PitMn County Efficient Building program and will incorporate efficient low flow fixtures' lighting, heating systems, as well as energy efficient glazing and insulation systems. The applicant requests a score of 2. d. _Amenities (maximum~three (3)P~mts) Considering the provision of usable open space, pedestrian and bicycle ways, benches, bicycle racks, bus shelters, and other common areas for users of the Proposed development. Response.. As mentioned previously, the applicant is committed to inco sidewalk along Hyman Avenue. Pedestrian safety will o ~ _ rporate a,, ,. quality of the ~ --~ be ,reproved and the aesthetic neighborhood will be enhanced with the incorporation ora sidewalk incorporating landscaping and tree plantings. A score of 3 is reCOmmended since the proposed development will result in a significant visual enhancement of the area. rog{s) m me proposed development to prevent infi'm ement designated scenic viewplanes g on Response: The previously submitted PUD appBcation for Park Place requests a height variance to 35feet for the parking structure, which will be similar to that of the adjacent Benedict Commons building. The residential units situated along Hyman Avenue will comply with the City's height limitation of 27 feet. f...Trash and utility access areas~(maximum three (3~oh,t~ Considering the extent ' · . . ' to which reqmred trash and uti/ay access areas are screened from public ~7; are,s, ized to meet the needs of the proposed development and to ~c utility ~lacemen,- o~,, ~ ...... ~ -- --, ~,.~ ~ easny accessea; allow trash bins to be moved by Park Place Commercial p-~ing Facility Land Use Code Standards Report Page 5 service personnel, provide users with recycling bins, and provide enclosed trash bins, trash compaction or other unique measures. Response: Most of the trash generated from Park Place will be associated with the two proposed residential units and therefore the need for trash services will be minimal. The applicant is willing to provide an easement for the placement of a Park Place dumpster on the adjacent Hannah Dustin building site. A score of 2 is requested for this section. 2. Availability of public facilities and serviCes (maximum ten (10) points). Each development application shall be rated on the basis of its impact upon public facilities and services by the assigning points according to the following standards and considerations: 0 - Proposed development requires the provision of new public facilities and services at increased public expense; 1 - Proposed development may by handled by existing public facilities and services, or any public facility or service improvement made by the applicant benefits the proposed development only, and not the area in general; or 2 - Proposed development improves the availability of public facilities and services in the area without increased, undue public expense. In those cases where points are given for the simultaneous evaluation of two (2) services (i.e., water supply and ' fire protectu>n) the determination of points shall be made by averaging the scores for each feature., a. Water ~upply/fire protection (maximum two (2) points). Considering the ability of the water supply system to serve the proposed development and the applicant's commitment to install any water system extension or treatment plant or other facility upgrading required to serve the proposed development. Fire protection facilities and services shall also he reviewed, COnsidering the ability of the appropriate fire protection district to provide services according to estabhshed response time without necessary of upgrading available facilities; the adequacy of available water pressure and capacity for providing fire fighting flows; and the commitment of the anolieant to er v ~' v,u~ m* pro[ecuon laCllllies WhiCh may be necessary to serve the proposed development. Response: The existing water supply for the property is feed by a main on Hyman Avenue, which will provide adequate supply for the project. The current pressure at this location is 75 b. Sanitary sewer (maximum two (2) points). Considering the ability ofthe sanitary sewer system to serve the proposed development and the applicant's commitment to install any sanitary system extension or treatment facility upgrading required to serve the proposed development, plant or other Response: The project will be connected to the City of .4spen sewer system. Park Phce Commercial Parking Facility Land Use Code Standards Report Page6 c. Public transportation/roads (maximum two (2) points). Considering the ability of the proposed development to be served by existing public transit routes. The review shall also consider the capacity of major streets to serve the proposed development without substantially altering existing automobile and pedestrian traffic patterns, creating safety baTards or maintenance problems, overloading the existing street system or eansing a need to extend the existing road network and consider the applicant's commitment to install the necessary road system improvements to serve the increased usage attributable to the proposed development. Response: The Park Place development Will be served by Hyman Avenue, which can adequately accommodate the users of the parking facility. It has been cited in a City of Aspen parking analysis, that vehicles have been observed to travel up to four times the minimum length of a trip in a prolonged effort to find available parking space. It was estimated that during peak hours, half the number of cars traveling on the street in Aspen are searching for parking. More readily available parking can reduce traffic by reducing the number of cars that are roaming the streets in search of on-street parking spaces. The additional parking amenities will be provided to public at absolutely no cost to the City of Aspen. The applicant requests a score of 2. d. Storm drainage (maximum two (2) points). Considering the degree to which the applicant proposes to maintain historic drainage patterns on the development site. If the development requires use of the City's drainage system, the review shall consider the commitment by the applicant to install the necessary control facilities and to maintain the system over the long-term Response: The existing drainage on the site Will not be negatively affected in any way. Additional drainage intakes Will be constructed in accordance with the requirements and standards of the City of Aspen Engineering Department. The applicant requests a score of 2. e. Parking (maximum two (2) points). Considering the provisions o f parking spaces to meet the commercial, office, and/or residential needs of the proposed development as required by Chapter 26.515, and considering the design of the parking spaces with respect to their visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience, and safety. Response: The Park Place parking facility will accommodate 99 vehicles, including those associated with the residential units and office space. This will serve adjacent uses and those internal to the project while, at the same time, provide additional parking opportunities for businesses, residents, and visitors in the Commercial Core. A score of 2 is suggested for this section. 3. Provision of affordable housing (maximum fifteen (15) points). Park Place Commercial Parking Facility Land Use Code Standards Report P~e7 a. General. Each developmem application shall be assigned points for the provisions of housing which complies with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City, and the provisions of the Affordable Housing Guidelines. b. Assignmem of points. Points shall be assigned as follows: (I) Zero (0) to sixty (60) percent of the additional employees generated by the proposed developmem: One (1) point for ~each six (6) percent housed; (2) Sixty-one (61 ) to one hundred (100) percent o f the additional employe, es generated by the proposed development: Ten (10) points for the first sixty (60) percent housed, plus one (1) point for each additional eight (8) percent housed. Response: The employment generated by this proposed development is about 5 year- round FTE personnel. The proposed residential units include a total of 4 bedrooms thus accommodating 4 people. The applicant should be awarded 12 points for this sectior~ 4. Bonus Points (maximum four (4) points). Bonus points may be assigned when it is determined that a proposed development has not only met the substantive standards of Sections 26.470.100 (A) through (C), but has also exceeded the provisions of these Sections and achieved an outstanding overall design meriting recognition. An award of additional bonus points shall not exceed ten (100 percent of the total points awarded under Section 26.470.100 (A) through (C). Response: No points are requested for this sectior~ Park plaCe ~0mmercial Parkin~ Facility Land Use Code Standards Report Page 8 ATTACHMENT B FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG engineering paths to rransportauon solutions August 28, 2003 Mr. Stan Clauson, AICP, ALSA Stan Clauson Associates, LLC 200E. Main Street Aspen CO 81611 RE: Traffic Analysis Park Place Parking Garage FHU Reference No. 03-169 Dear Mr. Clauson: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig has prepared this letter to summarize the traffic ~mpacts associated with the proposed 99-space Park Place Commercial Parking Facility (Park Place garage) to be located at 707 East Hyman Avenue in Aspen, Colorado. This letter summarizes the existing land use and traffic impacts associated with the small office building and parking area currently on the site, the existing traffic volumes on Hyman Avenue in the vicinity of the site, the number of trips forecasted for the proposed garage, and the traffic ~mpacts to the adjacent streets assoc ated with those trips. Existing Land Use Currently, the site consists of a 927 square foot A-frame office building and small surface parking lot that can accommodate approximately 15 vehicles. On a typical day, this lot is used to capacity. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)~, Sixth Edition was used to forecast the existing daily and peak hour trips associated with the office building. The existing parking lot trips were estimated based on information provided by the City of Aspen for the Rio Grande Parking Garage. In that garage during peak times of the year, each space is used approximately 1.5 each day, with the peak demand occurring between 11 AM and 2 PM, which is outside of the morning and afternoon peak hours of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 7 and 9 AM and 4 and 6 PM). Since traffic impacts are typically measured during the peak hour of street traffic, it was estimated that approximately 15 percent of the total daily traffic would occur during those mormng and afternoon peak periods. These characteristics were applied to the existing surface lot on the site. Table 1 shows the number of daily and peak hour trips currently associated with the site. As the table indicates, the existing land uses on the site generate approximately 105 daily trips, 12 AM peak hour trips, and 12 PM peak hour trips. 303.721.1440 fax ~x03.721 0832 fhu@fhueng.com Greenwood Corporate Plaza 795I E. Maplewood Ave. Ste 200 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 August28,2003 Mr. Stan Clauson Page 2 Table 1 Existing Trips Generated by the Site Office 927 SF 40 5 4 1 5 1 4 Parkin~l Lot 15 Spaces 45 7 6 1 7 2 5 Total Trips 105 12 10 2 12 3 9 Existing Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes on East Hyman Avenue in the vicinity of the site were obtained from the city. Summer counts were conduced in 1997 and winter counts were conduCted in 1994. These counts were factored to 2003 conditions based on the traffic growth factor calculated by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) for Original Street (SH 82) immediately east of the site. Based on this factor, Hyman Avenue currently experiences approximately 3,500 vehicles per day (vpd) in the summer and approximately 2,300 vpd during winter. The summer volume on Hyman is1,700 to 1,900 vpd lower than the summer volume on either Cooper Avenue (4,900 vpd) or Hopkins Avenue (4,700), one block north and south of the site, respectively, and is approximately 3,000 vpd lower than the volume on Durant Avenue (6,500 vpd), two blocks north of the site. All four streets appear to have similar mixes Of commercial and residential land use. Thus, it appears that Hyman currently experiences traffic volumes that are somewhat lower that the typical volumes on other local streets in the downtown area. Proposed Land Use As proposed, the site would be developed as a 99-space garage, with two affordable housing units. The garage is consistent with the land use identified for the site in the Aspen/Pitkin County Transit/Transportation Development Program, 1986-2000 (Leigh, Scott & Cleary, 1986), which identified a 300-space parking garage for the site. To maximize space usage, a mechanical system would be used to park cars. Drivers would park their car on one of two mechanical lifts, exit the car, and the lift would move the car into an available spot. Table 2 summarizes the trip forecast with the proposed land uses. ITE Trip Generation, 6t~ edition was used to forecast trips associated with the affordable housing. As for the garage, based on our understanding of the operation, all of the garage spaces would be available for purchase or long-term rental by local residents. It was assumed that approximately 20 percent of the spaces wouJd be used by part-time local residents to store their vehicles when out of town and thus would generally be unavailable for use on a daily basis. The remaining 80 percent (80 spaces) would be used on a daily basis by local residents, merchants, employees, and visitors. These daily spaces would be in a manner similar to the Rio Grande garage; i.e., each space used approximately 1.5 time each day, with approximately 15 percent of the daily demand occurring dudng the morning and afternoon peak hours of the adjacent streets. Based on these August 28, 2003 Mr. Stan Clauson Page 3 assumptions, the proposed land uses would generate approximately 250 daily trips, 37 AM peak hour trips, and 37 PM peak hour trips. Table 2 Proposed Park Place Trip Generation Affordable Housing 2 Units 10 1 0 1 1 I 0 Parkin~ Lot 80 Spaces 240 36 29 7 36 11 25 Total Trips 250 37 29 8 37 12 25 Traffic Impacts Table 3 summarizes the net trips generated by construction of the Park Place Garage. These trips represent the trips generated by the garage, minus the existing trips from the site. The total represents the new trips that would be added to Hyman Street. However, it should be noted that these trips are not new trips to the downtown Aspen area, but rather represent existing traffic that currently uses other parking locations. In fact, construction of the garage may result in a minor reduction in overall traffic in the downtown area, because some of the vehicles that would use the garage currently circle the area in search of on-street parking. With the new facility, these vehicles would drive directly to the lot and be removed from circulation. Table 3 Net Trip Generation from the Park Place Site Proposed Park Place Garage 250 37 29 8 37 12 25 Existin~l Site Land Uses 105 12 10 2 12 3 9 Net Total Trips 145 25 19 6 25 9 19 As the table indicates, Hyman Street in the vicinity of the site would experience'approximately 145 additional daily trips as a result of the Park Place Garage. This represents a three percent increase over the existing daily traffic volume on that block. The total daily traffic volume of 3,645 vpd on Hyman Street would still be approximately 1,250 vpd less than the daily volume on Cooper Avenue and 1,050 vpd less than the daily volume Hopkins Avenue, one block north and south of the site, respectively. Therefore, the parking garage would not change Hyman Street's character as a lower volume local street in downtown Aspen. August 28, 2003 Mr. Stan Clauson Page 4 Queuing The estimated total time required to park each car using the lift system would be approximately 90 seconds (from the time the vehicle drives onto the lift to the time the lift retums for the next vehicle); thus, with two lifts a total of 80 vehicles could be parked each hour (3600 seconds/hour / 90 seconds/vehicle * 2 lifts = 80 vehicles/hour). A waiting area with room for four vehicles would be provided on the site for vehicles entering the garage and waiting for the lift. To minimize queuing, these entering vehicles would be given priority with the lifts, and drivers would pay upon exiting. Based on projected peak period arrival rates and the lift processing time, during the morning and evening peak hours of adjacent street traffic the maximum queue at the lifts would be two vehicles, which would be contained within the four-car storage area. During the busiest hour of the day (mid-day peak) during the busiest time of year, it is estimated that a maximum of half of the daily spaces (40 spaces) would turn-over (40 trips in, 40 trips out). During these periods, the maximum queue would be 4 vehicles, which also would be contained within the site. Conclusions Based on the results of the analysis, the proposed Park Place garage would generate approximately 145 net daily trips from the site. This represents a three percent increase over existing daily traffic volumes on that block of Hyman Avenue, but still would result in total daily traffic volumes there that are significantly lower than the adjacent local streets. The garage could also result in a lowering of overall downtown Aspen traffic by reducing the number of vehicles circulating for on-street parking spaces. Peak period queuing by vehicles entering the site would be contained within the waiting area provided on site. I trust this information is sufficient for you to make an informed decision on traffic impacts associated with the project. If you haye any further questions, please call. Sincerely Senior Transportation Engineer MIDAMERICAN ELEV ATTACHMENT C August 27, 2003 Mr. 3ack Utschewskl MM-American Elevator Company 5701 General Wa~;hington Drive Alexandria, Virginia 2231Z Post-iff Fax Note 7671 OoJDe~ Reference: Summit Grand Parc - ParKing Machine Noise This letter summarizes the noise level measurements performed by Wyle Leborab3des at the Summit Grand Parc building in Washington~ D,C. This building has a parMn9 machine. The res[dent drives tI~eir vehicle 3nra 'roorn #2,~ The parking machine is then engaged. The platform in the room r~tates slightly and the vehicle is lowered to the appropriate level of the garage. Upon axE, the resident calls for the vehicle. The parlci~g machine uses a ct"eno to re'cdeve the vehicle and place it on a different platform, That plab"orm is then r~Ised up to "room ~L~, and the residen~ drives out:. overall A-weighted and one-third octave band sound levels were measured ~:wlce each second in the lobby and r~ ~he garage as the parking machine was operated. Sound levels ere often expressed in one-third octave bands. The range of human healing ~s approximately from ~0 ~o 20,000 Hz, The A-weighS:ed sound level ~ the most commonly used noise metric, The A-weightJng filter was designed to simulate the frequency senslt[vity of the human ear at Iow to moderate loudness. Two sounds with ~he same A-weighted sound level should be judge~ equally 10ad by mo~ people. Sound levels were measured during brief periods between ~0:30 and 1i:30 a,m. on August 27, 2003. The measurements were not performed when people were using cbc eluvator5 or lobby, Occas]onally', there was some noise from ~he reception desk and o~ce area on the opposite side of bhe tobby. Ambient noise was generally attributable to s~reet ~raffic, ventilation systems, and the distant office workers. The garage measurements were performed in the parking garage approxlma~ely ban feet Dom the overhead door at ~he entrance ~o room #2 (the room that drivers enter ffrs~ before parking). Sound Ievels were measured in file garaqe as the ma~ine was opera,ed in the exit and entrance cycles. No vehicle was on-~he platform during the tests. The lobby measurements were performed in the h~llway between the ?ecepUon desk and the elevators. The door bet~veen that hallway and the garage was closed. Sound levels were measured in each location during dh=latent cycles, not simuE-aneously. '~08/28/200S il:iS 177S48624~8 P~6g 02 Mr, Litschewsld August 27, 2003 Page Figure ! shows the A-weighted sound level each hall'-second, ~t can be seen from Figure i that sound JeveJ.~ were essentially the same in tl~e loel~y wi~ the parking machine operating as wftheut. It can also be seen t:het the $Oulld leYel in the garage ~e~ typically betw~_~,n .RO and e,.c; dl~A, and Occasionally reached 70 I:o 813 dBA. Figure Z shows the frequer~cy spectra averaged over the entire test period, a~d Rgure 3 shows I:he frequency specb-a averaged over the loudest five-second period. Again, it can be seen that soured levels were nearly ider~ical wlth the parking machine and without [t in the lobby. SubJectlvel¥, the parking machlr,e was barely eudible in the lobby. Please calf me at 703/41~-4550 ext. ;LB if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Ga .r..'/.~hrlich~ P.E. Senror Acou~ical Engineer Figure 1, A-weighted Sound Leve'.s Each 0.5 Second ~ 60I ~30 ~0 0 --=- Garage Dur'~-tg Exit · -~-'Garal~e - During Enlry , · Lobby' - A.r~ient ~ Lobby - Dudng Entry SampleNumber 20 lO Rgure 2. Average Frequency Spectra During Test -a--Garage During Exit · Garage - During Entry - Lobby - Arnb)ent · ~-Lob)3y - During Entry One-Third Octave t~an~i Cantor Frequency, Hz Figure 3. Frequency Spectra Durir~g Lot~dee! Five Second Period 6~ 20- tD .... -~"-~obby- Dud?gEntry I Lobby-Ambient ___J --m-Garage - During Enll3' I'-~- Garage Oaring Exit One-Third Octave aa~d Center Frequency, Hz SOUND PRESSURE Jet Take-Off m ~i~t~c~ ~' ~ra 100 000 000 -- 10000000 -- Rock ~ ~ ~ ~__ Group SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL 14o dB ~ ~J ~ -~ Firecr /" -- 120 Pneumatic Chipper Ay;rage St~et T~affic ~--~h~ ~ ~ ~ 100000 10000 -- Library 100 -- --100 4 Noisy Workplace -- 90 8O -- 70 4 4 4 "~ 4 "~ Business Office -- 5O -- 40 q q Living Room -- 3O 2O '300 So: Spring ATTACHMENT D 300 South Spring Street Viuinity Map ,% ~45T ATTACHMENT "~EGEND AND N'OTE$ E ATTACHMENT F PARK PLACE ~ ~yatem 3OO 80UTH aep(m, oolorado L2 MEOHANIOAL PARK PLACE ~ system 3O0 80IJTH · spen. colorado ELEVATION L2 I"'1ECNAN I C,4,L L~ L2 L~ MEOl-.IANIO,4,L Gt~:)U"rl-I PARK PLACE Ko~er~ System a~l~n, oolorado PARK PLACE ~o~ system ~00 80UTH 8F'Fmq9 a~oen, colorado _ ?'1ECN,~,NICAL UJEE~T ELE'v'ATI(::~I O TRAS UTILiT VEHICLE RETRIVA STAIR LOt~B -- OFFICE 270 SQ FT, VEHICLE PARKING SYSTEM AREA ENTRY / EXIT ENTRY / EXIT 60'-0" "~P A R K PLACE %qq~E VE L-- -- 0 VEHICLE PARKING SYSTEM STAIR BATHROOM APARTM -- TWO LEVEL BEDROOM 67.5 SQ, F ~T -- 49'- 8? BEDROOM APARTMENT UNIT KITCHEN' TWO LEVEL LIVfNO AREA -51 ,_~5_,, ~4 60'-0" PARK PLACE VEHICLE PARKING SYSTEM KITCHEN APARTMENT UNIT TWO LEVEL ROOM ENTRY ~ BATHRO01 BEDROOM APARTMENT UNIT 1682 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA PAF~K PLACE -60'-0"- HI V L 63' 63' 13'-10' 16'-4~ 49,-9~ 18'-7~ Not to Scale ATTACHI'IENT G ALLy¥ BLocI(- 105 Park Place 300 South Spring Street Aspen, Colorado Landscape and Site Plan DATE: REVISIONS: SHEET: AI'I'ACHHENT H ATTACHHENT I 12 June 2003 Mr. Stan Clauson Start Clauson Associates 200 E. Main St. Aspen, CO 81611 To Whom it may Concern: As the Managing member if Hyman Avenue Holdings, LLC, I give Stan Clauson Associates, LLC and his staffpermission to represem us in discussions with the City of Aspen regarding the developmem of the Park Place garage at 707 E. Hyman Avenue in Aspen, Colorado. We have retained this firm to assist us in the planning phase of project. ffyou have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me: Sinc~ery, /7 Jdl~ Cooper, Managing Partner Hyman Avenue Holdings, LLC CITY OF ASPEN WI::a='i""i' PAID RTTACHHENTJ CITy OF ~ C)ATE HRETT PAID No. WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Name: Address: Hyman Avenue Holdings, LLC C/o Kmbacher Sanders, PC 201 N. Mill Street, Ste. 201 Aspen, CO 81611 WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this 28th day of February, 2003, between GeOrge A. Vicenzi Trust, as to an undivided 25% interest and Alan J. Goldstein, as to an undivided 75% interest of the said County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, grantor, and Hyman Avenue Holdings, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company whose legal address is C.B. Management, PO Box 1747, 605 Sherman Parkway Springfield, MO 65801-1747 of the said County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, grantee: WlTNESSETH, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confn'm, unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever, all the real property, together with Improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the said County of Pitkin and State of Colorado described as follows: Lots A, B, C and D, Block 105 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN also described as follows: THE HANNAH-DUSTIN CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Plat thereof recorded October 2, 1985 in Plat Book 17 at Page 78 as Reception No. 271969 and as defined and described by the Condominium Deolaration for HANNAH-DUSTIN CONDOMINIUM recorded October 2, 1985 in Book 496 at Page 375 as Reception No. 271967. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO also known by street and number as: 300 S Spring St., Aspen, CO 81611 File Number:. 00030095 Warranty Deed - Photographic Record (Extended) a iof2 479376 TRiI EIt DECL ATION RECEIVED 2/28/2ee3 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said Buyer, his personal representatives, successors and assigns, forever. The said Seller covenants and agrees to and with the Buyer, his personal representatives, successors and assigns, to WARRANT AND DEFEND the sale of said property, goods and chattels, against all and every person or person whomever. When used herein, the singular shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to ail genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Seller has executed this Bill of Sale this ~-~ day of George A. Vic' _~zi Trustee of~G~ A. Vicenzi Trust STATE OF (~G~(~ ~_~ covm The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of ~xo~,-~ . ~_f)~. by George A. Vicenzi, Tmstec of the George A. Viconzi Trust My commission expires Notary Public: · Witness my hand and official seal. File Number: 00030095 S~ewart Title of Aspen. h]c. Bill Of Sale - (-Extended) Page 2 of 2 479376 P&ge: 2 of 4 ez/28/zeea el :~e~ SZLVI;~ DRVI$ PZTKIN COUNTY CO R 21.ee D 6~e.eo COUNTY The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 02 o~.~:~ , by Alan L Goldstein My commission expires Not~p 'ublic~..~t~ ~- Witness my hand and official seal. File Numl:er: 00030095 StcqVaxt Title of,Aspen, Acknowledsetr~nt. Seller Page l of 3 EXHIBIT 1 EXCEPTIONS 1. Distribution utility easements (including cable TV). 2. Inclusion of the Property within any special taxing district. 3. The benefits and burdens of any declaration and party wall agreements, if any. 4. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents, or an act authorizing the issuance thereof; water fights, claims or title to water. Taxes for the year 2003 and subsequent years not yet due and payable. Exceptions and reservations as set forth in the Act authorizing the issuance of the Patent for the City and Townsite of Aspen recorded March 1, 1897 in Book 139 at Page 216 as Reception No. 60156. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Agreement by and between the City of Aspen and Hannah Dustin Building Associates, a joint venture as set forth in instrumem recorded October 2, 1985 in Book 496 at Page 371 as Reception No. 271966. Terms, conditions, obligations, provasions and easements of Easement Agreement recorded August 24, 1972 in Book 266 at Page 229 as Reception No. 153522. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Condominium Declaration for Hannah- Dustin Condominiums as set forth in instrument recorded October 2, 1985 in Book 496 at Page 375 as Reception No. 271967. 10. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Subdivision Agreement as set forth in instrument recorded October 2, 1985 in Book 496 at Page 409 as Reception No. 271968. 11. Easements, rights of way and other matters as shown and contained on Plat of Hannah- Dustin Condominiums recorded October 2, 1985 in Plat Book 17 at Page 78 as Reception No. 271969. ATTACHMENT K CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: PROJECT: REPRESENTATIVE: OWNER: TYPE OF APPLICATION: DESCRIPTION: James Lindt, 920.5095 DATE: 9.15.03 "Park Place" - Commercial Parking Garage GMQS Application Start Clauson, Brian McNellis, Jeffeay Halferty Peter Fornell GMQS Scoring Application Owner is in the PUD r~dew pn~,~ss to censtmet a commercial parking facility and associated affordable housing at 707 E. Hyman Avenue. The facility will use a fully automated mechanical systemlbr pmtdngvefiicles. In conjunction wi~ the PUD, Sulxtivision, and Conditional Use portions of the application flaat have already been submitted, a ~ial GMQS application is required. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.470.080 GMQS 26.470.100 Review by: Public Hearing: ~al Agencies: Planning Fees: Referral Agency Fees: Total Deposit: Total Copies: Development Allotment and Application Procedures Growth Management Scoring Criteria- Commercial and Office Development Staff~ Growth Management Commission OaH), Cit~ Council (PIT), Board of Cotmt~ Commissioners Yes, at both the Growth Management Commission and City Council. Applicant must post property and mail notice at least 15 days prior to hearing. Applicant will need to provide proof of posting and mailing with an affidavit at the public hearings. Housing (other referral agencies are reviewing the PUD portion of the application). Planning Deposit, Major ($2,520 for 12 hours of staff time) Housing Major was included in PUD Application $2520 (additional Planning hours are billed at a rate of $210/hour) 3O TO apply, submit the following information: 1. Proof of ownership. 2. Signed fee agreement. 3. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 4. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, COnsisting ora on'rent certificate fi.em a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the propexty, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's fight to apply for the Development Application. 5. Total deposit for review of the application. 6. Required Copies of the complete application packet and maps. 7. An 8 1/2" by 1 I" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 8, Additional materials as required by the specific review. (Refer to cited code sections) 9. A written description efthe proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form ofhow the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. 10. Applications shall be provided in paper format (number of copies noted above) as well as the text only on eithar ofthe following digital formats. Cumpact Disk (CD)~preferred, Zip Disk or Floppy Disk. Microsoft Word format is preferred. Text format easily convertible to Word is acceptable. Notes: 1. An estimate on employee demands should be included in the cenc~ptual application in pregoration for the GMQS application. A refenal frem Housing will be sought. A Housing Board meeting may be required. The foregoing smnmary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the fotere, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accm~te. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.