The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPitkin.EH.264315301002 (2019)Page | 1 Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) USE PERMIT Permit for Continued Use of an Existing OWTS 76 Service Center Road, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970-920-5070 Fax: 970-920-5374 www.aspenpitkin.com/EHNR Parcel ID #: 2643-153-01-002 OWTS Use Permit #: 0053.2017.POWU Date Issued: 8/25/17 Issued By: Kurt Dahl Expiration Date: 8/25/18 Owner(s): Suzanne Farver Property Address: 223 Meadowlark Ln, Main House and ADU Legal Description: Lot 7 Tract 7, White Star Ranches Licensed Inspector: Carla Ostberg Inspection Date(s): 1/31/2017 SYSTEM INFORMATION Components Type Capacity/Size Primary Treatment Unit Concrete two-compartment tank 1500 Gallons Secondary Treatment Unit Absorption Area Pipe and gravel trenches 1500 ft2 Other System Components Distribution box OWTS Use Status: In use at the time of the inspection. Not in use at the time of the inspection.* *If the OWTS was not in use at the time of the inspection, it is recommended that the system be re-evaluated when it is in use for a more accurate evaluation of the system. System Records: Permit #: 89035 Date of Issuance: 06/28/1989 Date of Final Approval: 09/19/1989 # of Bedrooms or fixtures served by OWTS: System was sized for 4 bedrooms. However the system is serving a total of 5 bedrooms (4 in the main house and 1 in the CDU). This discrepancy shall be addressed when the house and/or CDU are remodeled or the OWTS is repaired/modified. Operational Status: According to the inspectors observation the system was functioning as designed at the time of inspection. The tank was in water tight condition with inlet and outlet tees in place. The assumed field area did not show any signs of failure. Inspector Recommendations: Add effluent tee to tank outlet, add a removable cap to the clean-out near the residence, Locate distribution box Department Recommendations: Annual maintenance Issuance of this OWTS Use Permit is based solely on the conditions observed and reported by the inspector to the Department on the date of the inspection(s) and on Department records at the time of permitting. The issuance of this permit does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or representation by the Department that the system will operate properly or will not fail or that the system will not be subject to future enforcement action to correct non-compliant conditions. Estimated capacity of the system has been listed on the permit and we recommend that you monitor and/or meter water use to prevent overuse and possible failure. Page | 1 Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) USE PERMIT Permit for Continued Use of an Existing OWTS 76 Service Center Road, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970-920-5070 Fax: 970-920-5374 www.aspenpitkin.com/EHNR Parcel ID #:2643-153-01-002 OWTS Use Permit #:0053.2017.POWU Date Issued:8/25/17 Issued By:Kurt Dahl Expiration Date:8/25/18 Owner(s):Suzanne Farver Property Address:223 Meadowlark Ln, Main House and ADU Legal Description:Lot 7 Tract 7, White Star Ranches Licensed Inspector:Carla Ostberg Inspection Date(s):1/31/2017 SYSTEM INFORMATION Components Type Capacity/Size Primary Treatment Unit Concrete two-compartment tank 1500 Gallons Secondary Treatment Unit Absorption Area Pipe and gravel trenches 1500 ft2 Other System Components Distribution box OWTS Use Status: In use at the time of the inspection. Not in use at the time of the inspection.* *If the OWTS was not in use at the time of the inspection, it is recommended that the system be re-evaluated when it is in use for a more accurate evaluation of the system. System Records: Permit #: 89035 Date of Issuance:06/28/1989 Date of Final Approval: 09/19/1989 # of Bedrooms or fixtures served by OWTS: System was sized for 4 bedrooms. However the system is serving a total of 5 bedrooms (4 in the main house and 1 in the CDU). This discrepancy shall be addressed when the house and/or CDU are remodeled or the OWTS is repaired/modified. Operational Status: According to the inspectors observation the system was functioning as designed at the time of inspection. The tank was in water tight condition with inlet and outlet tees in place. The assumed field area did not show any signs of failure. Inspector Recommendations: Add effluent tee to tank outlet, add a removable cap to the clean-out near the residence, Locate distribution box Department Recommendations: Annual maintenance Issuance of this OWTS Use Permit is based solely on the conditions observed and reported by the inspector to the Department on the date of the inspection(s) and on Department records at the time of permitting. The issuance of this permit does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or representation by the Department that the system will operate properly or will not fail or that the system will not be subject to future enforcement action to correct non-compliant conditions. Estimated capacity of the system has been listed on the permit and we recommend that you monitor and/or meter water use to prevent overuse and possible failure. Residences: # of Bedrooms: Other fixtures/uses: *Contact information must be provided for the owner signing this application. Please allow 3-5 business days for processing of Use Permits. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Business Phone: Email Address:Fax Number: Cell Phone: Business Phone: Property Owner(s)*: Owner's Mailing Address: Contact/Applicant Mailing Address: Primary Contact Person/Applicant (if not owner): Home Phone: Company: City, State, Zip: Date: Date: City, State, Zip: Phone Number:Email Address:Fax Number: Applicant Signature: Pitkin County Environmental Health Department Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) USE PERMIT APPLICATION Application for Continued Use of an Existing OWTS Purpose of Use Permit: - - - Mailing Address: Licensed Systems Inspector: Property Address: Parcel ID# (available from the Pitkin County Assessor's Office 970-920-5160 or at www.pitkinassessor.org): 76 Service Center Rd Aspen, CO 81611 Website: www.aspenpitkin.com/ehnr/ Received by EH Staff:Fee & Receipt #:Date: Owner Signature (Required): Email Address: City, State, Zip: Lot: Block: Filing: Subdivision: PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING: I certify that the above information is complete and accurate and that I have provided complete and accurate information in all of the documents included in my application package. I acknowledge that this department may revoke any permit I am issued if my application is found to contain any inaccurate, false, or misleading information. PROPERTY TRANSACTION REMODEL/ Owner's Name: Address: Parcel Number: Inspection Date: Pitkin County Systems Inspector License Number: QUESTIONS FOR PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO INSPECTION: Is the home currently occupied?YES NO If NO, how long has the home been vacant? How many bedrooms are in the home? RECORDS: Were system records available from Pitkin County?YES NO If YES:Permit number: ___________ Date of Final Approval: _________ # of bedrooms permitted: ___________ Was an as-built drawing available?YES NO Is the as-built drawing accurate? YES NO If NO: SITE CONDITIONS: Proper grading, no evidence of erosion?PASS FAIL Improper vegetative cover?NO YES Evidence of compaction such as heavy machinery or livestock?NO YES Improper discharges such as straight pipes?PASS FAIL Evidence of high ground water?NO YES Snow cover present?NO YES Any question marked FAIL will require correction before an OWTS Use permit is issued. If secondary treatment is used, who is the maintenance provider? Complete a drawing of the system on last page of this form as accurately as possible. Email: Inspector's Name: Business Name: A copy of this inspection report will be remitted to Pitkin County Environmental Health Department by the Licensed Systems Inspector within 60 days of the inspection regardless of whether the system passes or fails. Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) Use Permit Inspection Form Inspection form for continued use of an existing OWTS Website: Pitkin County Environmental Health Department 76 Service Center Rd, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970-920-5070 Fax: 970-920-5374 Phone Number Page 1 TANK: Tank capacity gallons gallons gallons Tank material # of compartments Date of last pumping Lids/risers in good condition Risers to grade Riser height Riser condition/watertightness Inlet sanitary T/baffle Outlet sanitary T/baffle Effluent filter (if part of design) Condition of tank material Tank was pumped for inspection If YES, list the pumping company If NO, when was the last pumping Scum level (1st compartment)inches inches inches Sludge level (1st compartment)inches inches inches Scum level (2nd compartment)inches inches inches Sludge level (2nd compartment)inches inches inches Backflow (if pumped) Midtank baffle Watertightness PUMPS/DOSING SIPHONS: Is a pump or dosing siphon present?YES NO If YES, is the pump/dosing siphon functioning properly?PASS FAIL Does the pump/wiring/dosing siphon appear to be in good condition?PASS FAIL Is the high water alarm working, both visible and audible?PASS FAIL SECONDARY TREATMENT: Is a secondary treatment unit present?YES NO UNKNOWN If YES, does the unit appear to be in good working condition?YES NO Does the owner have a current maintenance contract for the unit?YES NO UNKNOWN Maintenance Provider:_______________________________________Phone:________________________ ABSORBTION AREA: Effluent surfacing?PASS FAIL Evidence of past surfacing?NO YES Surface dampness?NO YES Excessive odors?NO YES Field location verified by observation ports or probing:Ports Probing Liquid in observation port?NO YES If YES, record depth:inches Distribution Box or ADV part of original design?YES NO UNKNOWN If YES, is it accessible from grade?YES NO Is it level and in good condition?PASS FAIL If there is no maintenance contract, a contract must be in place prior to occupancy of the home. A copy of the contract must be submitted to Pitkin County Environmental Health Department. Tank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3 Page 2 Any problems with the system that were not addressed in the inspection checklist? Please list any recommendations for the continued use of the system: Were any repairs done as a result of this inspection?NO YES If YES, please describe the repairs. Licensed Systems Inspector Signature: Additional Notes: To the best of my knowledge and training, the information collected in this inspection is accurate as of __________________, 20____. Clearly label any pictures and attach them to this form. Page 3 CBO Inc. 33 Four Wheel Drive Road Carbondale, CO 81623 cell) 970-309-5259 office) 970-704-0484 carla.ostberg@gmail.com February 8, 2017 Jay Wright Jay.Wright@elliman.com Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) Use Permit Inspection 223 Meadowlark Lane (Main House) Pitkin County, Colorado Jay, As requested, CBO Inc. performed an Onsite W astewater Treatment System (OWTS) Use Permit inspection at 223 Meadowlark Lane (Main House), Aspen, Colorado on January 31, 2017. The legal description of the 13.94-acre property is Lot 7, White Horse Springs Ranches. The permit and record drawing was provided by Pitkin County Environmental Health Department (Parcel ID #2643-153-01-002). The subject OWTS consists of one 1500-gallon, two-compartment concrete septic tank. Effluent gravity flows to a distribution box and then to pipe and gravel trenches. Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit 89035 documents this system. The system was sized to accommodate 4 bedrooms. The permit received final approval on September 19, 1989. The OWTS is located to the north of the residence. A clean out is located on the north side of the residence. This clean-out does not appear to have a cap. We recommend putting a removable cap on the clean-out. Both septic tank lids are accessible from grade. Four feet of risers bring access to grade. Both inlet and outlet tees were present. We recommend adding an effluent filter to the outlet tee of the septic tank. If installed, this filter must be cleaned annually or as needed. Levels in the septic tank appeared normal at the time of the inspection. We measured the solids in the septic tank and there was no scum on either side and 12” of sludge on the inlet side of the tank and 8” of sludge on the outlet side of the septic tank. Pumping the septic tank at this time is not necessary. The distribution box was not accessible from grade; therefore, we were unable to inspect this component. We recommend locating the distribution box and bringing access to grade for future inspection and maintenance. There was significant snow cover over the soil treatment area (STA) at the time of our inspection. No inspection ports were observed. We did not see evidence of surface saturation or failure at the time of our inspection. This evaluation is not a guarantee of future system performance. This inspection is good for one year. Recommendations: • Add an effluent filter to outlet tee. If installed, this filter must be cleaned annually, or as needed. • Add a removable cap to the clean-out near residence. • Location distribution box to assure it is in good condition and distributing to each trench equally. Bring to grade for future access and inspection. This report and a completed OWTS Use Permit Application must be submitted to the Pitkin County Environmental Health Department. Applications may be submitted to Pitkin County Environmental Health Department electronically. The following are links to the required OWTS Use Permit Application and Checklist. Application: http://www.pitkincounty.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/621 Application Checklist: http://www.pitkincounty.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/620 All questions regarding permit submission can be directed to Pitkin County Environmental Health Department, 970-920-5070. Disclaimer: This inspection is intended only as an evaluation of the present condition of the OWTS based upon what was observed and the Licensed Inspector’s expertise in onsite wastewater technology. The Inspector has not been retained to warrant or guarantee the proper functioning of the system for any period of time in the future. Because of numerous factors which may affect the operation of an OWTS, as well as the inability of the Inspector to supervise or monitor the use or maintenance of this OWTS, this report shall not be construed as a warranty by the Inspector that the system will function properly for any particular prospective buyer, and the Inspector disclaims any warranty, either expressed or implied, arising from the inspection of the OWTS or this report. The evaluation does not ascertain the impact the system is having on groundwater. Please call with questions. Sincerely, Carla Ostberg, MPH, REHS NAWT Certified Inspector Certification # 11044ITC Exp. April 2018 Clean-out View of septic tank lids looking toward house Access to inlet side of tank Inlet tee Outlet tee View of septic tank lid looking toward STA. First trench begins approximately 40-feet from the septic tank. feet meters 500 100 I-TKIN v G►Ll tv T ADDRESS NOTIFICATION Date: 9/26/2016 Effective Date: 10/3/2016 New Assigned Address: 223 Meadowlark Ln Aspen, CO 81611 Former Address: 114 Meadowlark Ln Reason for Assignment: New access to a Single Family Residence Parcel ID: 264315301002 Property Owner Name: FARVER SUZANNE Note: This address update reflects the change in access to the neighboring residence which required an extension of Meadowlark Ln, and this residence is now is on the odd side of the roadway. As of the effective date, 114 is retired and removed from service and replaced by 223. Please contact for any questions or Further Clarification. Thank You, Alex Durant Public Safety GIS Analyst, Pitkin County Government i BITS Phone: 970.429,6113 (0) Email: alex.durant@pitkincounty.com Address: 123 Emma Rd #106, Basalt CO 81621 %TKIN Legend _�\\ COUNT Address Assignment • Addresses — Road Centerline N Date: 9/26/2016 �� —Driveway Parcel Boundary 1:4,500 ASPEN*PITKIN o2 to 43 —155 -fl i _DOL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OEPARTMENT STYPINDIVIDUALSEWAGEDISPOSALPERMITNO. Z -I o 15— TYPEE OF PERMIT: Yj Initial construction ( )Emergency Use ( )Repair Work,(Pievious Permit 1 .) ( )Alteration of an existing system, or installation (Previous Permit 1 .j as Permit as a result of Sale - ( )Other# ISSUED TO: {DATE OF ISSUE 2 OLmerQow-.e& eKYr &)ZANNE/A,C'VC Rome Phone_ _ Business Phone Mailing / Address C ILP/A1 "15-INE'le /] ` Agent S1441 .YAMS — S796 19AL /CQII IS Phone 24'/ — o /V Mailing 6M A Sf EAlG( UYJ,nAddresslGNulf1Yf72 JPiE'I/t S OD 91601 Sewage Disposal System Work to be performed This permit v d only for premises location by the following legaleAfscriptions /ACT LOT Siff QI ES MATER SUPPLY B I U. AVERAGE PERCOLATION This Individual Sewage Disposal Permit is granted with regard to the following use: JMVtz M-4 Al `KE SI iEk usher o[t Dodreoma Lofts 0 Garbage Disposal s_L Dishwashers_L Clothes Washers CALCULATED AVERAGE DAILY WASTE LOAD nn GALLONS. THE NATURE OF THE SYSTEM INCLUDED UNDER THIS PER11IT: Type of Tank or Treatment uitt SEPTIC IANK MCtM•7 of [Leal Disposal# H I nTJOAJtA10 H AbsorPtloD Ocscriptlon (Including brand name, if any) of other equipment or,appurtnancess Tank Capacity /,2,5-0 _Gallon Minimum Area Square Feet Mintmtm S Other Conditions or Speeificationst A105 -r MAIArrAIAJ N/i/ihlch> Eq i ec1 SEF'/2ATicA/ c F I&I SAT/Oil D17c y AA)f1B PPTia/ f,P fI STAGES REQUIRING INSPECTION BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT: Before Excavation ( )Upon completion of excavation and prior to placement of gravel Sc /' aE7l,W6--t1 AlBefore covering distribution system of absorption field Prior to backfill of any component ( )Other, Specify# _— Plan/s \and specifications of the proposedsevage disposal system have born reviewed and are considered satisfactory. Permission is hcrchy granted to tl,e owner or his agent to pnrfnrm the work indicated above in accordance with the Pitkin County Individual Sewage. ULSPosal Re,uilations in effect on the date of issue. In addition to general provisions set forth on tine reverse hetsof, this Permit is subject to the followings additional terns and conditions; moi Environmental APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY ) /, (title) Health OFficer Tl,.r• al, evc in.iividual acw..j* disposal system Installed by t!jt,Q fj(NQIZIL ._ has lw•en ln q.CetCd bur use by a rcprraCntativC of the Aspea ';t inn Cnvu Ilta Ilea rP r anent. Th, rvcpons tUlLt in ce f failure or Lnad quacy of this aewmla 113loaal system. Complete as-buLlL drovingbi42-i- IAae oLa -L -$q Rf DATE OF FINAI, 1:'PT:CTIO;! q- N CX BY: Aspen/Pitkin Environmental TITi,L•' A Heal mgr 0 130 South Oelene Street Aspen, Colorado 8161'1 30:P/BQO-6070 N 0 ASPEN46PITKIN ENVIR NMENTAL HEALTH DEPAROAENT APPLICATION FOR AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL -PERMIT Name of OWNER L3E/rE' &P:lY s<r,,.1-/,rV r/CiP` PHONE Address of OWNER ;1 A L.jk( , e Ze_, Name of/ APPLICANT FjLh cz'tf(cS `a--, PHONE rlq PE 0.MtT TO BE: SLA Picked Up - ( )Mailed tot TYPE OF PERMIT: N ev Installation ( )Repair Owner ( )Applicant ( )flnergency Use ( )Alteration NOT due to failure LOCATION OF PROPOSED SYSTEM, Legal Description Lot '—vC.-_T ' Block - Filing Subdivision Wtf rz-R,fp,lCf size of Let acres TYPE OF STRUCTURE: KI ingle Family Dwelling ( )Other, On you plan any further additions to the residence? ( )YES ( )NO No. of bedrooms_ No. of Lofts No. of Garbage Disposals No. of Automatic Dishwashers 1 No, of Automatic Clothes Washers WATER SUPPLY: ( )Private Well, Depth or ( )Public, Name of System h,) r1r Spring Stream iF-P`rStreamorCreek TYPES OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED, Septic Tank/Absorption Field I )Aeration Plant/Absorption Field ( )Composting Toilet ( )Incineration Toilet ( )Mound Recycling, potable use ( )Recycling, other use l )Vault Privy ( )Other. The initial site inspection must be arranged with the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department 1935-3030. 8:30-9:30 a.m.) before a permit can be issued. The individual sewage disposal permit must be issued before a building permit can be obtained, FINAL INSPECTION APPROVAL MUST BE GIVEN BY THE ASPEN/PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO BACKFILLING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. Application for an individual sewage disposal permit is hereby submitted. The undersigned acknowledges that the above information is true and that false inform tion vi}l in_vjlido a the lieatiD"A, and any subsequent permit. t"f ' &F l s CC _ 5 p Signature of Appilca nt / r•' DATE S'rJ ,J 1 ppl ea on becomes. invalid 13 months from the above dace.) NOTE: PLOT PLAN must be filed with this application. Please locate the following items by measured distances: 1. Property lines and dimensions. 2. Proposed and existing water wells on subject property and adjacent property_ 3. Domestic water service lines. Proposed and existing buildings, driveways, and other structures. 5. Streams, lakes, ponds, irrigation ditches, and other water courses. 6. Proposed and existing individual sewage systems on subject property. SUBMIT A REVISED PLOT PLAN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IF INSTALLATION IS TO BE CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL PLAN. The undersign hereby acknowledges receipt of this individual sewage disposal pe, t lloatien and a peL ofee in the amount of F L 5—C ' ` Receipt Numbcr Date Fea Rceelved :' by fP C Administrative officer 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado B1611 303/925-2020 open / Pitkin Environmental Health Departm• Contact Log Sheet Name: FaIr V&, / 9ParcelID#: ,R y3 - /S 3 - 0/ - o0 a- Address: girl x&L 'las+ ,b[ r Date Person Spoken To Comments / Action to be Taken Initials d d C R II J 9 ASPEN*PITKIN • ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT Legal decx Name of Ow Address: FIELD TEST DATA SHEET Name of Agent: Water Supply: Public Utility_ Subdivision Private Well Lot Area: y Distance to Nearest Surf ce Water r4 ft. Dates Observations Made: Soil Borings: r X9 by 4f/1 Percolation Tests: by FAJ SOIL BORING TESTS 11111111 iliil<i{i ii i iifkl/! MllEdi/1<i 1€i€i[ilMi[iii€iYiiii[iil€AiHiC T Ter L D[ITN DoT« TD u.Y•D w(Tu, ru. p[.TxIxCM[[ D[MYv(D Lr1YDTlD NIDY vuD[• ClT e1 ee1L MI TY rDi l•/ JD11N I[lT YOT T0 LeOr HDIOe uTII IOO P-1 xeN1(T[e B-1 B-2 S S, C.T "A*44-30- T„ 46 11111111 1111111 11111 1111111 111 i1111111111111111111111i PERCOLATION TESTS 11111 1111 1111111111111 1111/N111 miss 1111111161111111 11111 rCLr Y Y eCll p[.TxIxCM[[ xwe[' CM ee(T[Y er yeu IM<C x0 TMI(W((L IY WCM[ IfT Y(r wu[YeL[ MIIY141T ew. 1. •Tu uv[L, uC«ur[a. n..[ YIYwu Te r.LL Ox[ 1KCx T[w(L um«0 rYFYT[ Le(T D(OIOO YOT T0LeOrHDIOe uTIIIOO P-1 SPAM IY L TY 4A P-2 S S, C.T "A*44-30- T„ I v 7 y P-3 3 1tT @.A r P-4 11111 1111 111111€iill[II NIX limmmmkwomI wwwwokm Nix Average Rate:/ 4 minutes/inch Plan of a iLtye on the back Date l[ / Signature 806 NELSON STEN/PITKIN SANITARIAN 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 oosr 6A FAI 0 A--I 0 0 Co'T"`aop5 FrMCE Chen -Northern; .nc. Job No. 4 214 89 5080 Road 154 Glenwood Springs. CO 81601 3031945.7458 SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE TRACT 7, 14PITE STAR RANCH PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO J Prepared For: George Berky & Suzanne Farver 360 Gilpin Street Denver CO 80218 4 A member of the HIH group of companies 3n1.ngs Great Fans Boise Helena Casper Phoenix Colorado Springs Pocatello Denver Rock Springs Elko 3a11 Lake City Evanston San Antonio Giletle Th Cities Glanwppd Spnngs Yakima RECEIVED MAR 1 < 1989 STRUCTURALASSOCIATESCO March 13, 1989 I E TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 CONCLUSIONS 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 SITE CONDITIONS 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 2 SUBSOIL CONDITIONS 3 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 4 FLOOR SLABS 5 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 7 SURFACE DRAINAGE 7 LIMITATIONS 8 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL-CQNSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Chen -Northern, Inc. CONCLUSIONS The subsoils encountered at the site below organic topsoil consist of slightly sandy silty clay overlying dense sand and gravel. The proposed residence can be founded with spread footings bearing on the clay subsoils, below all topsoil, designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2500 psf. Due to the swell potential of the clay subsoils, the footings should also be designed to impose a minimum dead load pressure of 500 psf. Other design and construction criteria relating to geotechnical aspects of the site are presented in the body of the report. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for foundation design of a proposed residence to be located on Tract 7, White Star Ranch, Pitkin County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The study was conducted in accordance with our professional services agreement letter to George Berky and Suzanne Farver, dated February 6, 1989. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was con- ducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine com- pressibility or swell characteristics and classification of the on-site soil. Results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed residence. Results of the field exploration and laboratory testing are presented in the report. This report has been prepared to summarize the data obtained and to present our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. Design parameters and a discussion of geotechnical engineering considerations related to construction of the resi- dence are included in the report. Chen -Northern, Inc. 1/6 z- 0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a two-story wood frame structure with a partial basement and crawl space. The basement and attached garage will have slab -on -grade floors. The residence will be located as shown on Fig. 1. For the purpose of our report preparation, foundation loadings for the structure were assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type construction. If loadings, locations or conditions are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The subject site is a vacant field located east of the Meadowlark Lane cul-de-sac. The topography of the building area is gently rolling with a moderate slope down toward the north with grades estimated at 5p to 10%. Elevation difference across the building area is about 7 to 8 feet. An exis- ting irrigation ditch borders the building area to the east. The building area is vegetated with grass and weeds. Several large deciduous trees and underlying brush are located along the irrigation ditch to the east of the building area. Approximately 3 feet of snow covered the site at the time of our field work. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on February 14, 1989. Three exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions in the proposed building area. The borings were advanced with a 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger Chen -Northern, Inc. powered by a truck -mounted CME -55 drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Chen -Northern, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 1 3/8 -inch I.D. spoon sampler and a 2 -inch I.D. California sampler. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSOIL CONDITIONS The subsoil conditions encountered at the site are shown graphically on Fig. 2. Below about 1 foot of organic topsoil, the subsoils consisted of stiff to very stiff, whitish -brown, silty, slightly sandy clay. The clays were encountered in the borings to depths of 19 to 23 feet. Below the clays, very dense sand and gravel with cobbles was encountered to the maximum depth explored, 25 feet. Drilling in the dense gravels with auger equipment was difficult due to cobbles and possible boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained during the field explo- ration included in-situ moisture content and dry density, grain size analysis and liquid and plastic limit testing. Swell -consolidation testing was performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the clay subsoils. Swell -consolidation test results, shown on Fig. 4, indicate low to moderate compressibility under light to moderate surcharge loadings and a slight expan- Chen -Northern, Inc. sion potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge. Liquid and plastic limit testing indicates the silty clay subsoils are of low to medium plasticity. Gradation analyses performed on the minus 1 112 inch fraction of the lower sand and gravel subsoils are presented on Fig. 5. The laboratory testing is summarized on Table I. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. The subsoils were slightly moist to very moist. There may be perched water zones. FOUNDATION RECOMME14DATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the resi— dence be founded with spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils. The expansion potential of the clay subsoils can probably be mitigated by load concentration to reduce or prevent swelling in the event of wetting below footing level. Surface runoff and utility leakage are possible sources of water which could cause wetting of the subsoils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. Construction criteria should be considered when preparing project documents: 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural silty clays at the site, below all topsoil, can be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2500 psf. The footings should also be designed for a minimum dead load pressure of 500 psf to resist the expansion potential. In order to satisfy the minimum dead load pressure under lightly loaded areas, it may be necessary to concentrate loads using a grade beam and pad system. Based on experience, we expect settlement/heave of footings designed and o? Chen -Northern, Inc. constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch. There could be some additional movement if the bearing soils were to become All topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the natural subsoils. The footings should have a minimum width of _16 inches for continuous footings and 24 inches for isolated pads. Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protec- Placement of foundations at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is generally used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid unit weight of 45 pcf. Backfill should consist of predominantly granular soils and will probably have to be imported to the site. If the on-site soils are used as back- fill, a lateral earth weight of at least 65 pcf should be used. A representative of the soil engineer should observe all footing excava- tions prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FLOOR SLABS The on-site clay soils possess a slight swell potential and slab heave could occur if the subgrade soils were to become wet. Slab -on -grade construc- tion may be used provided the risk of distress is understood by the owner. Based on the laboratory test results and our experience in the area, the risk of structural damage due Chen -Northern, Inc. slab heave appears low but some movement is I7 0 -6- -0 To reduce the effects of some differential movement, nonstructural floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls, columns and partition walls with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Interior and nonbearing partitions resting on floor slabs should be provided with a slip joint at the bottom of the wall so that, if the slab moves, the movement cannot be transmitted to the upper structure. This detail is also important for wall boards, stairways and door frames. Slip joints which allow at least 1 inch of vertical movement are recommended. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. We suggest joints be provided on the order of 15 feet on center. Slab reinforcement should be 2 8kee established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 -inch layer of fine gravel may be placed immediately beneath slabs -on -grade. This material should consist of minus 2 -inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 Sieve and less than 50, passing the No. 200 sieve. The gravel will aid in construction and drainage below the slabs. Fill beneath slabs should consist of nonexpansive soils such as granular material, excluding oversized rock. The fill should be spread in thin hori- zontal lifts, adjusted to near optimum moisture content and compacted to 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. All vegetation, topsoil and loose or disturbed soils should be removed prior to fill placement. If the on-site soils are used as fill below slabs, there could be some slab heave due to the expansion potential of the clay. The above recommendations will not prevent slab heave if the expansive soils underlying slabs -on -grade become wet. However, the recommendations will reduce the effects if slab heave occurs. All plumbing lines should be pres- sure tested before backfilling to help reduce the potential for wetting due to leaking pipes. Chen -Northern, Inc. 7- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although groundwater was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience where clay soils are present that local perched ground- water may develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Therefore, we recommend below -grade areas be protected from wetting by an underdrain system. The drain should also act to prevent buildup of hydro- static pressures behind foundation walls. The underdrain system should consist of drain tile surrounded by free - draining granular material placed at the bottom of the wall backfill. The drain line -should be placed at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finished grade (crawl space or floor slab level) and sloped at a minimum 1% grade to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the drain system should consist of minus 2 -inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. The drain gravel should be at least 2 feet deep. To reduce water infiltration into the bearing soils, an impervious liner such as 20 mil PVC should be placed at the bottom of the underdrain trench and attached to the footing with mastic. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and. -maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Excessive wetting or drying of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. Drying of the clay soils could increase the expansion potential for those soils. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and com- pacted to 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement areas and 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 5 Chen -Northern, Inc. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 to 3 feet of the on-site clay soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. u) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and the proposed type of construction. The nature and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not become evident until excavation is performed. If during construction, fill, soil, rock or water conditions appear to be different from those described herein, this office should be advised at once so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata by a representative of the soil engineer. Very truly yours, CHEN-NORTHERN, nINNCC. By Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. Reviewed By',G DEH/ec Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. cc: Harry Teague Architects; Attn: Chris Melton -- Nicol -Hutchinson Engineers; Attn: Joe Nicol 40 Chen -Northern, Inc. T------] SITE ; TRACT 7 HOLE 2 3'dr PROPOSED - RESIDENCE - HOLE 3 - - - - 1 APPROXIMATE SCALE I" = 400' II, „ HOLE I7410 PROPERTY LINE APPROXIMATE SCALE I " = 40' 14 214 89 1 Chen & Associates I LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS I r1g• I I Hole 1 El. = 7691' 7695 Mal 17/12 7670 40/6, 20/0 WC=4.0 7665 +4=45 o -200=10 50/0 7660 Bole 2 E1. = 7684' Hole 3 El. = 7689' 76 7690 21/12 %685 WC=8.4 32/12 ',680 17/12 0 DD= 111.8 WC -8. 9 200=87 200=91 LL=33 655 0 P1=15 WSS=0.017 7675 LL=31 16/12 P1=14 WC=1S.2 DD=112.3 7670 10/12 23/12 IVC=23.0 680 DD=100.2 UU o 29/12 WC=17.2 7675 UD=112.0 u u 17/12 7670 40/6, 20/0 WC=4.0 7665 +4=45 o -200=10 50/0 7660 Bole 2 E1. = 7684' Hole 3 El. = 7689' 76 7690 21/12 %685 WC=8.4 32/12 ',680 WC= 16.9 0 DD= 111.8 200=87 LL=33 0 P1=15 WSS=0.017 7675 16/12 WC=1S.2 w DD=112.3 7670 23/12 85/6 7665 W'C=2. 9 4=39 200=15 7660 Note: Explanation of symbols presented on Fig. 3. 4 214 89 1 Chen & Associates I LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fly. 2 LEGEND: 0 Topsoil; slightly sandy silty clay, organic, roots, moist, dark brown. Clay (CL); silty, slightly sandy, slightly to moderately calcareous, stiff to very stiff, moist to very moist, brown to whitish brown. EMGravel and Sand (GM -GP); slightly silty with cobbles, possible boulders, very dense, slightly moist, brown. Relatively undisturbed sample; 2 -inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 13/8 -inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Depth at which boring caved following drilling. tPractical rig refusal. 17/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 17 blows of a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. NOTES: 1) Exploratory borings were drilled on February 14, 1989 with a 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2) Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3) Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4) The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5) The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 5) No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7) Laboratory Testing Results: WC - DD = 4 = 200 = CI Water Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Percent Retained on No. 4 Sieve Percent Passing No. 200 sieve LL PI WSS Liquid Limit (%) Plasticity Index (%) Water Soluble Sulfates ($) 4 214 89 Chen & Associates LEGEND NOTES 3 C C chen and associates, inc. I DIAMETER O: PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS f C -Y TC S:LT v,%' I ..:EJ'um !::,APSE I CJS;S GRAVEL 45 'a SAND 45 ^s SILT AND CLAY 10 % 6 LICUID L:IAIT % PLASTICITY INDEX SAIAPLE Of silty sand g gravel FROM Hole 1 at 24.5' C.AY TO SILT DIAMETER Of PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS_ GRAVEL 39% SAND 46 % SILT AND CLAY 15 % UOUID LIMIT ~ PLASTICITY INDEX S SAMPLE OF silty sand 6 gravel FROM Hole 3 at 24' 4 214 89 GRADATION TEST RESULTS "'9 5 0 0 1 nJf-. 4 r- 0 3 4 Chen and associates, il. 01 t0 .0 1UU APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf mo sture Content - 23.0 perce,t DryUnit Weight - 100.2 oCl Sampleot: silty Clay From: Hole 1 at 9.5' Mo.sture Content = 17.2 percent Dry Unit Weight = 112.0 pct Sampleot: sandy silty Clay From: Hole I at 14.5' F 1'gh N J 11je ent up n \l\ er jonstit prc w t 1 g. to wet ing. 01 t0 .0 1UU APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf C. t 1.070 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 4 214 89 C\AICr \-nKfcnl in6Tiro l TCCT OCcI U TC Cin 4 Mo.sture Content = 17.2 percent Dry Unit Weight = 112.0 pct Sampleot: sandy silty Clay From: Hole I at 14.5' F 1'gh lion un er jonstit prc ss r to wet ing. C. t 1.070 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 4 214 89 C\AICr \-nKfcnl in6Tiro l TCCT OCcI U TC Cin 4 O OZ 00 U) w r U 0 U) Q 0 Z Z W U F- V! W F- LL 0 LU F- J m Cc F- 0 m Q J 1 UJ 7 Ii W W a 1/1 VI 17 ul N h N LLI Itl K D < O u 3 O D4OL 3 VI In oW 4 W= oaa¢ Q N7U N UWP DON2 dO m a. JJ W V O W II UNOW O 1 M W40^ nZz N= V V 0 0 J u M o- y N O a0 M Z O 4 F u Ol O N O Q O1 N Ol N'o N N 400Z]U N r r2W N N u7 u7 VI M N O— C Q1 C V C 01 C II C N o M z a3 a 'Sinks = 16.8 'als 2- til. & 156 Ge cc,, 1d 7 0 13 kn;+S ( Z +re, 11-5 0 7 &a,) eld S a(L oto rcducf,, fie, Ll Nelson Environmental & Wastewater Solutions, Ltd E June 19, 1995 W Norris and Associates P. O. Box 5759 S Snowmass Village, CO 81615 E Subject: Soils Evaluation and Percolation Tests for an Individual Sewage System Design for a Barn and Agricultural Building at the Farver Residence on Tract 7, Second Amended White Star Ranches, numbered as 0114 Meadowlark Lane Dear Sirs, As requested, Nelson Environmental and Wastewater Solutions, Ltd., performed a soils study and percolation tests to design a septic system for the proposed residence. We conducted this study in accordance with Article 5 of the Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation. We have based our recommendations on the subsurface conditions encountered. We will furnish this letter to the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department at our earliest convenience to obtain a permit to construct this individual sewage system. Proposed Construction: The proposed barn is to be a two-story frame agricultural building with two half -bathrooms and four horse stalls. Site Conditions: The property is approximately 15 acres in size. The drinking water is to be provided from the subdivision water system. The road and access drive are constructed to the property. The building site is on a lot located behind the WU Ranch in Woody Creek. The upper part of the lot is covered with some scrub oak brush and grass. The lower part of the lot is primarily irrigated meadow. There are several irrigation ditches in the area. The ground surface of the site appears natural throughout the proposed area of building and within the site of the absorption field. The ground slopes to the Southwest at a 10% grade in this area. Subsurface Conditions: A soil profile pit was excavated to a depth of approximately nine feet. The profile excavation was done about seventy feet below the staked barn site. No groundwater was encountered and bedrock was not present within nine feet of the surface of the ground. The top three feet of the profile excavation was a reddish dark black topsoil with a characteristic silty sandy clay texture. Below the topsoil to the bottom of the profile was a calcareous reddish brown fine sandy loam of uniform consistency. The sandy exhibited smearing and compaction from the pressure of earthmoving equipment, but did not appear to be expansive. I rj' I P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO. 81615 Office (303) 923.3289 Home (303) 923.2766 Farver Residence Soils Evaluation and Percolation Test for Individual Sewage System Design Tract 7, White Star Ranches - 0114 Meadowlark Lane June 19, 1995 Page 2 The subsurface soil conditions were evaluated with the standard percolation test procedure at the approximate location shown on Figure 1. By agreement with the Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department, only one test hole was excavated by hand in the bottom of a shallow backhoe pit dug earlier in the week.. The subsoil in which the percolation testing was conducted consisted of a reddish brown fine sandy loam. The soil was well consolidated and showed little tendency to swell. Percolation Testing: Percolation testing was performed in the proposed absorption area West of the staked building site. The shallow hole was hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pit excavation, prepared earlier to a depth of approximately five feet. We pre-soaked the percolation test holes by adding water beginning the afternoon before the percolation test measurements and then approximately eight hours before starting the percolation test measurements. The test hole was refilled every two hours thereafter until evening. Some water remained in the percolation test holes after each of the initial presoaking periods. The results of the percolation testing are presented in Table I. The result indicates the fine sandy loam subsoil has a percolation rate of 23 minutes per inch at a depth of approximately five and one-half feet. This soil is considered acceptable for a conventional infiltration trench design for the on-site sewage system. Limitations: This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area for use for sewage disposal design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon data obtained from our site visits at the location indicated. There is some possibility that the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface soils across the site may not have been evident at the time of this investigation, and may need additional evaluation, if further excavation reveals conditions different from those described. This office should be advised of any unusual situations as soon as possible so we may reevaluate our recommendations. If you have questions or if we may be of further assistance, please call the office. Sincerely, Robert F. Nelson President cc: Jay Evarts, Architect Reviewed By: jYh mmo ueser, Nelson Environmental & Wastewater Solutions, Ltd E W S TABLE PERCOLATION TEST RESULT FORM Hole Length Depth at Depth at Drop in Average Hole Depth of Interval Start of Interval End of Interval Water Level Percolation No. (in.) Minutes) Inches) Inches) Inches) Rate(Min./Inch) 1 68 10 75/8 6 15/16 11/16 10 6 15/16 63/16 3/4 10 63/16 5 11/16 1/2 10 511/16 51/4 7/16 10 51/4 411/16 7/16 10 411/16 41/4 7/16 23 Suzanne Farver Property Barn Tract 7, White Star Ranch Date of Percolation Test: 06/16/95 P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO. 81615 Office (303) 923.3289 Home (303) 923.2766 Nelson Environmental & Wastewater Solutions Ltd E Property Address: 0114 Meadowlark Lane W Legal Description: Tract 7, White Star Ranches S Property Owner: Name Suzanne Farver Address 0114 Meadowlark Lane, Aspen CO 81611 Phone 925-1825 Contractor: Excavating Contractor: Name: Norris and Associates, Inc. Name: Unknown Address: P. 0. Box 5759 Address: Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Phone: 923-2030 Phone Saturation and Swelling o Smeared surfaces removed X Yes o Gravel Added X Yes To a 4" Depth o Date and Time presoak water added 06/15/95 at 3:00 o.m. 8t 06/16/95 (d 9:05 a.m o Amount of presoak water added 6 gallons/test hole on 6/15 12 gallons/test hole on 6/16 o Water remaining in holes after presoak? Hole 1: X Yes _ No Percolation Rate Measurement Hole 1: 23 minutes/inch AVERAGE 23 minutes/inch I certify that the above information is correct and Groundwater: o Not Encountered to 9 ft. o Estimated depth to high seasonal water if not encountered- 50 feet o Is area believed to be subject to seasonal fluctuations which could result in a seasonal water table? Yes X No Slope in absorption area 10%to the SSW Bedrock o Not Encountered o Estimated depth if not encountered -100 ftet o Type of bedrock: Sandstone X Claystone Siltstone Other: Fractured Weathered o Is bedrock believed to be permeable? Yes _No N/A complete to the best of my knowledge and that all tests were performed in accordance with the provisions of Pitkin County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulation, Articles 5.1 through 5.8. obert F. Nelson President Reviewed by: P. E. ordon, Meyer 0 P.O. Box 6961 Snowmass Village, CO. 81615 Office (303) 923.3289 832‐R‐13‐002 i1►�,p . • +-.t .}, i +' + \• -t {-�.�-t:li` 1, �_�C�- �- i '4�,+t, T\�4-��Lf}1 r) .+ ' - i ++.� yt,.� tl � ij�• }�_} tit= !. ;i, �fi .' � �, +��.i �/ f tt �j F .L_1 ��N mil'({t �•�. ! 7 '��``., 1�31�Iti�'�.i.�JtLiNiP�`�[�i �� i•�'�',. __.1_' i .. _ n��+'{'+�1 `' P♦.*t+t{{��i } ��,�'�jy��'+: a?V!�-k� Y ii�)y�i�;e�} .Si ��':i�_7lLR L.�lt�•. . _ • t�,•Te_'�\Thi.��t�.7Lir; `1`, t 4`t�,�� }+ 0330236 02/ 12/91 16:20 Rec $. 00 BK 639 PG 594 Silvia David, Ritkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL TO THE BERKY/FARVER CARETAKER UNIT Resolution No. 90- 0 WHEREAS, George Berky and Suzanne Farver, hereinafter "Applicants", have applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin"County, Colorado, hereinafter "Board", for approval of an attached caretaker unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13 of the Land Use Code; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's parcel is zoned RS-20 and is approximately 13.9 acres in size; and WHEREAS, said parcel is located at 0114 Meadowlark Lane; Tract 7, White Star Ranches Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Applicant is proposing the addition of a caretaker unit to a single family residence; and WHEREAS, a lot must typically meet the minimum lot size requirement in the zone in which it is located in order to be eligible for an attached caretaker unit (pursuant to Section 3- 8.13); and WHEREAS, a substandard sized lot in an approved PUD is eligible for an attached employee unit as long as the overall density of the subdivision meets underlying zone requirements; and WHEREAS, the overall density of the White Star Ranch Subdivision complies with underlying zone requirements; and WHEREAS, the Board heard this application at a regularly 3 �1 1 All #33t�?3b t�^/ l /91 16: ^t�-- • .�+r('1��11'*?__'�i•� hec $. t t BK 639 PG 595 Silvia Davis, Fitkin Cnty Clerk, Dec $.00 Resolution No. 90 A0 Page 2 i scheduled public hearing on January 23, 1990 evidence and testimony was ' at which time presented with respect to this application; and WHEREAS, the Board determined that the proposed unit meets the criteria established in Section 3-8.13 of the Land Use Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it does hereby grant approval to the Berky/Farver caretaker unit application subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall deed restrict the employee unit With the Housing Authority building permit for the unit. The following, of a Section 3-8.13 (a)(4) of the Land Use Code shall as per apply: The -employee unit shall remain a rental unit; not be condominiumized; not be occupied by the owner or spouse; be limited to occupancy by not more than two (2) adults, and related children, who qualify as (and have been found by the Housing Authority to be) employees of the community under such guidelines as may be from time to time established b y said Authority; be rented for terms not less than six (6) months. 2) The employee unit shall be restricted to as logs gas appliances, should a fireplace unit be i stalled.or APPROVED by the Board at its regular meeting on January 23 1990. • I Y, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO By �49 A-oz I o, Herschel Ross, Chairman Ll • rr �t ` . ice•,! - - , •a. i; �• .�� '` ` �•`, `�, 1'71`'ry i; 1 { � .- YI �� ;��^ �ti � •ta3tizf Ya: �Iti�Wft •� • 1 `\4 S• ri I,�i1 't Li l �!tt i4-. ..;�e►`��9UN4 ; 33036 0-112/91 16:20 Rec s.00 BK 639 PG 596 Silvia Davis, Fitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.0-0 Resolution No. 94-& Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORK: �;--s Timothy E. County Atto y i I APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 8/22/2017 Gmail - FW: Gitalong - EDU M Gmail FW: Gitalong - EDU 1 message Wright, Jay <Jay.Wright@elliman.com> To: Carla Ostberg <carla.ostberg@gmail.com> Cc: "Stirling, Bill" <Bill.Stirling@elliman.com> Hi Carla, Carla Ostberg <carla.ostberg@gmail.com> Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:06 AM Thanks for chatting this AM. I sent the attached BOCC approval to you a few minutes ago for the EDU. I have also attached public documents which show the approval from the Environmental Health department that the existing septic can handle the overflow from the additional unit, specifically on pages 11 and 13. I'll get back to you with the barn plan modifications. Thanks! Jay JAY WRIGHT DOUGLAS ELLIMAN REAL ESTATE Stirling Peak Team, Aspen DIRECT: 970.920.2300 OFFICE: 970.925.8810 MOBILE: 970.948.3584 jay.wright@elliman.com 520 EAST DURANT AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611 SOCIAL: FACEBOOK / TWITTER / GOOGLE+ / YOUTUBE / INSTAGRAM / LINKEDIN VIEW MY LISTINGS This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. The information contained in this communication may be confidential and may be subject to the attorney -client privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive similar electronic messages from us in the future then please respond to the sender to this effect. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Company. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=fee4fb5Oa9&jsver=RKK5Ah87d4U.en.&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15eO5c28dbl O7b77&siml=15eO5c28dbl O7b77 1/2 8/22/2017 Gmail - FW: Gitalong - EDU From: "Wright, Jay" <Jay.Wright@elliman.com> Date: Monday, August 21, 2017 at 10:02 AM To: Carla Ostberg <carla.ostberg@gmail.com> Subject: FW: Gitalong - EDU This shows the approval for the EDU at 223 Meadowlark. From: "Wright, Jay" <Jay.Wright@elliman.com> Date: Monday, June 19, 2017 at 10:19 AM To: "Stirling, Bill" <Bill.Stirling@elliman.com> Subject: Gitalong - EDU See attached which was a link off the title commitment. It looks like the use was approved for an EDU. 2 attachments �i 904775_753082201_0.pdf 413K pitkin.planning.264315301002 (2).pdf 1877K https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=fee4fb5Oa9&jsver=RKK5Ah87d4U.en.&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15eO5c28db107b77&siml=15eO5c28db107b77 2/2 DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (I Ixt7) PARCEL 2643-763-01002 DATE RCVD: �— #COPIES: �- CASE NO P99A-89 ID: CASE NAME: I Berky/Farver EDU/CDU Planners., �— PROJ ADDR: 0114 Meadowlark Ln OWN/APP: Berky, George, Fary ADRI C/SIZ:j PHN:.�— REP: ADR:r— -- CIS/Z:F PHN:r-- Email Addr: ALLOCATED HOURS:[ FEES DUET--_ "FEES RCVD:— % OVER: F REFERRALSI MTG DATE RrrE` Ir I REFI BODY PH N [No gyr—., DUE:_ rICED DATE OF FINAL ACTION: BOCCReso:' BOCC Ord: PZ• 90-167 #330 336 REMARKS GF I I2643-220-10-070 HRG OFF: CLOSED:— BY: �— HO INDEX: r---- ADMIN: �— PLAT RECORDED— PLAT (BK,PG):f --- ADMIN INDEX: ^—_ — VR APPROVAL DATE:; F VR EXPIRES: CASE TYP: EDU/CDU CASE TYPS:.. CASE TYP2: CASE.TYP6: CASE TYP3: CASE TYP7: CASE TYP4:1 Date Scanned:.... 9/23/09 File Location: IBox 176 I-TKIN v G►Ll tv T ADDRESS NOTIFICATION Date: 9/26/2016 Effective Date: 10/3/2016 New Assigned Address: 223 Meadowlark Ln Aspen, CO 81611 Former Address: 114 Meadowlark Ln Reason for Assignment: New access to a Single Family Residence Parcel ID: 264315301002 Property Owner Name: FARVER SUZANNE Note: This address update reflects the change in access to the neighboring residence which required an extension of Meadowlark Ln, and this residence is now is on the odd side of the roadway. As of the effective date, 114 is retired and removed from service and replaced by 223. Please contact for any questions or Further Clarification. Thank You, Alex Durant Public Safety GIS Analyst, Pitkin County Government i BITS Phone: 970.429,6113 (0) Email: alex.durant@pitkincounty.com Address: 123 Emma Rd #106, Basalt CO 81621 j1KIN Legend _1\ Address Assignment CoUNT4 Date: 9/26I2016 Addresses — Road Centerline N —Driveway Parcel Boundary 1:4,500 t DATE RECEIVED: 12 89 DATE COMPLETE' 5 PROJECT NAME: Project Addre CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET Pitkin County ]53-01-00� PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. 2643-229 1@-@79_ 99A-89 STAFF MEMBER' r�-- APPLICANT'• Geor a nci.. Applicant Address: 360 Gil in Street Denver CO REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Melton Har Tea a Architects Representative Address/phone: Aspen CO11S1611e5-2556 ---__-- -- -- --- Np pF COPIES RECEIVED: 4 PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: -!It*— v// TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO /jVESTED RIGHTS: YES NO BOCC Meeting Date _L� PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Staff Level: 1041 Minor Hazard Review: Date of Approval REFERRALS School District �ttorney Aspen Consol S.D. Mtn. Bell _ Rocky Mtn Nat Gas •._Engineer State Hwy Dept Housing _ Holy Cross spen Water — Fire Marshall (Glwd) (GrJtn ) SnowMass Vill Zoning _�/Envir. Hlth. FAACO Geo. Survey Manager USFS (Aspen) Div. Wildlife — Div. Water Res. _ USFS (Carbondale) Caucus Other: INITIALS: DATE REFERRED: — ' DATE ROUTED: FINAL ROUTING1 INITIAL: vv County Engineer Zoning County Attorney Envir. Health Housing Other: I FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: �( '33023,6C � ' / 12/91 16: ^-0 Rec l Dt: 639 PG 594 1via..Davis, F'itt:inCnty C1-:-*:, Doc $-00 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITRIN COUNTY COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL TO THE BERRY/FARVER CARETAKER UNIT Resolution No. 90-10 WHEREAS, George Berky and Suzanne Farver, hereinafter "Applicants", have applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, hereinafter "Board", for approval of an attached caretaker unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13 of the Land Use Code; and WHEREAS, the Applicant's parcel is zoned RS-20 and is approximately 13.9 acres in size; and WHEREAS, said parcel is located at 0114 Meadowlark Lane; Tract 7, White Star Ranches Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Applicant is proposing the addition of a caretaker unit to a single family residence; and WHEREAS, a lot must typically meet the minimum lot size requirement in the zone in which it is located in order to be eligible for an attached caretaker unit (pursuant to Section 3- 8.13); and WHEREAS, a substandard sized lot in an approved PUD is eligible for an attached employee unit as long as the overall density of the subdivision meets underlying zone requirements; and WHEREAS, the overall density of the White Star Ranch Subdivision complies with underlying zone requirements; and WHEREAS, the Board heard this application at a regularly 330236 02/12/91 16:20 hec=4.00 Bk. 639 PG 595 47.via Davis, Pi.t4:in Cnty l...er4:, Doc $.00 z Resolution No. 90-10 Page 2 scheduled public hearing on January 23, 1990, at which time evidence and testimony was presented with respect to this application; and WHEREAS, the Board determined that the proposed unit meets the criteria established in Section 3-8.13 of the Land Use Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it does hereby grant approval to the Berky/Farver caretaker unit application subject to the following conditions: 1990. 1) The applicant shall deed restrict the employee unit with the Housing Authority prior to issuance of a building permit for the unit. The following, as per Section 3-8.13 (a)(4) of the Land Use Code shall apply: The employee unit shall remain a rental unit; not be condominiumized; not be occupied by the owner or spouse; be limited to occupancy by not more than two (2) adults, and related children, who qualify as (and have been found by the Housing Authority to be) employees of the community under such guidelines as may be from time to time established by said Authority; be rented for terms not less than six (6) months. 2) The employee unit shall be restricted to gas logs or gas appliances, should a fireplace unit be installed. APPROVED by the Board at its regular meeting on January 23, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PIITRIN COUNTY, COLORADO By �l��n L P -CC RQA Herschel Ross, Chairman 14,7-3(-)236 02/12/91 16:20 Rec $.00 Silvia,Davis, Pitkin Cnt 0 lerk, Pf; 639 c'6 596 Doc $. 00 Resolution No. 90-A-0/Z Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Timothy E., i t, County Attor y APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY TO: Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting - January 23, 1990 RE: Berky/Farver Employee Dwelling Unit FROM: Ellen Sassano, Planning Office APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Melton, Harry Teague Architects ISSUE: Pursuant to Section 3-8.13 of the Land Use Code, the applicant is proposing the addition of an attached employee unit to a single family residence. The primary residence is currently under construction and is to have a gross floor area of 6,600 square feet. The attached unit is to be an efficiency unit with a gross floor area of 498 square feet. LOCATION: 0114 Meadowlark Lane; Tract 7, White Star Ranches Subdivision, accessed off of McLain Flats Road RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends approval of the Berky/Farver Employee Unit subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Memo of January 23, 1990. ELS AIS BERKY EMPUNIT MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ellen Sassano, Planning Office RE: Berky/Farver Employee Dwelling Unit DATE: January 23, 1990 APPLICANT: George Berky & Suzanne Farver APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Melton, Harry Teague Architects LOCATION: 0114 Meadowlark Lane; Tract 7, White Star Ranches Subdivision, accessed off of McLain Flats Road ZONING: The property is zoned RS-20 PUD and is approximately 13.9 acres in size. REQUEST: Pursuant to Section 3-8.13 of the Land Use Code, the applicant is proposing the addition of an attached employee unit to a single family residence. The primary residence is currently under construction and is to have a gross floor area of 6,600 square feet. The attached unit is to be an efficiency unit with a gross floor area of 498 square feet. SITE HISTORY: The White Star Subdivision PUD consists of clustered lots which are smaller than the minimum lot size allowed in the RS-20 zone. This variance from zone district requirements is allowed in a PUD, as a means of providing larger tracts of open space, pursuant to Section 3-7.2 of the Code. The density of the overall subdivision does not exceed the allowable density in the zone in which the PUD is located. A lot must typically meet the minimum lot size requirement in the zone in which it is located in order to be eligible for an attached employee unit (pursuant to Section 3-8.13). However, a substandard sized lot in an approved PUD is eligible for an attached employee unit as long as the overall density of the subdivision meets underlying zone requirements. Such is the case in the White Star Ranch Subdivision. REFERRAL COMMENTS: 1) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: In his memo of January 3, 1990, Bob Nelson commented that: a) The existing sewage system will be adequate to handle the increase in flow from a studio/caretaker apartment without any further changes or modifications to the system. b) The subdivision water system, from which Tract 7 is served, is adequate in terms of quality and quantity of water produced. c) The employee unit should be restricted to gas logs or gas appliances if a fireplace unit is contemplated at all. 2) COUNTY ENGINEER: In his memo of January 8, 1990, Tom Newland made the following comments: a. The attached unit will not significantly impact County Roads. b. Information in the application indicates that a four car garage will accomodate the provision of one off-street parking space per bedroom in the primary residence. In addition, one off-street parking space will be provided for the employee unit in the driveway/turnaround area. All code requirements for parking are met. PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS The applicant is proposing the addition of an attached employee unit to a single family residence. Section 3-8.13 of the Code states that the Board of County Commissioners may permit the construction of one residential dwelling unit attached to or within a single family home on any lot which conforms to the minimum lot area requirements within the RS-20 zone district under the following conditions: (1) Newly constructed employee units shall not have more than one (1) bedroom nor exceed five hundred (500) square feet of total floor area. (2) The total floor area of the principal and employee unit shall not exceed the allowable FAR of the applicable zone district. (3) There shall be provided one (1) off-street parking space for each bedroom within the principal unit and one (1) off-street parking space for each employee unit. (4) The applicant shall by deed restriction or other permanent commitment running with the land, guarantee that the employee unit shall remain a rental unit; not be condominiumized; not be occupied by the owner or spouse; be limited to occupancy by not more than two (2) adults, and related children, who qualify as (and have been found by the Housing Authority to be) employees of the community under such guidelines as may be from time to time established by 2 said Authority; be rented for terms not less than six (6) months. The applicant proposes an attached efficiency unit, in which the bedroom area is to be common to the living area. The unit is to be 498 square feet in size and deed restricted to rental use by employees of the community, as per Housing Authority guidelines. There is currently no maximum FAR restriction in the RS-20 zone. The total proposed floor area of the residence and employee unit is equal to an approximate FAR of .01, which is not excessive, given the size of the applicants lot. The applicant is providing ample parking for the primary residence and attached unit. A total of five spaces are provided to accommodate four bedrooms in the primary residence and one in the attached unit. The proposed unit meets the criteria established in Section 3- 8.13 of the Code. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends approval of the Berky/Farver Employee Unit subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall deed restrict the employee unit with the Housing Authority prior to issuance of a building permit for the unit. The following, as per Section 3-8.13 (a)(4) of the Land Use Code shall apply: The employee unit shall remain a rental unit; not be condominiumized, not be occupied by the owner or spouse; be limited to occupancy by not more than two (2) adults, and related children, who qualify as (and have been found by the Housing Authority to be) employees of the community under such guidelines as may be from time to time established by said Authority; be rented for terms not less than six (6) months. 2) The employee unit shall be restricted to gas logs or gas appliances, should a fireplace unit be installed. E LS MEMO_BERKR FARV EMPUN ASPEN*PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO: Ellen Sassano, Planning Department 0 FROM: Bob Nelson, Department of Environmental Health1 DATE: January 3, 1990 RE: Berky/Farver Employee Dwelling Unit Review Parcel I. D. # 2643-222-01-007 4;� The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the above -mentioned land use submittal under authority of the Pitkin County Code, Title II, and has the following comments. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-7 and 5-200: The original plans for the residence included an on -site wastewater disposal system with a constructed capacity of 750 gallons per day, considered suitable under Pitkin County regulations for a "conventional" five -bedroom home and up to ten occupants. The approved sewage disposal permit application and the submitted building plans currently show only four bedrooms in the main house. Therefore, it is our opinion that the existing system will be adequate to handle the increase in flow from a studio/caretaker apartment without any further changes or modifications. A copy of our completed sewage disposal permit record is attached. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-6 and 5-205• The parcel, Lot 7 White Star Ranch, is served by the subdivision water system. We have certified this system as meeting the subdivision review requirements for quantity and quality listed in our memos pertaining to general submission and final plat for the approved subdivision. The existing system meets the requirements of the drinking water supply sections of the Land Use Code. There should be no problems with the drinking water supply for the caretaker unit or for the larger house being built. There are two water storage tanks with a total volume of 13,000 gallons for the water system and six-inch water distribution mains in the roads. The engineers' water supply analysis indicates that there is adequate water from the spring source. This system was designed with a buildout capacity of approximately 4200 gallons per day, limited by storage volume. AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-17 and 5-106: It is our interpretation that the attached caretaker unit is not allowed a wood -burning fireplace, but may be permitted —a certified wood stove or gas -log fireplace. The plans for the main house apparently show only one fireplace in the living room. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-5070 applicant and their representative, we suggest that the employee unit be restricted to gas -logs or gas appliances, if a fireplace unit is contemplated at all. The additional development would then generate no more wood smoke than those subdivision lots around it. Summary It is our conclusion that there should be minimal environmental impacts resulting from the additional water demand, wastewater disposal, and woodburning. Therefore, we have no technical objections to the requested approval for the site. MEMORANDUM TO: Ellen Sassano, Planning Office FROM: Tom Newland, Assistant to the County Manager RE: Berky/Farver Employee Dwelling Unit DATE: January 8, 1990 I have reviewed the information submitted and would like to forward the following comments to you: Impacts on Road System: The addition of an employee unit to this lot should have negligible impact on the existing road system. The Road system within the White Star Ranches Subdivision is built to County standards and will sufficiently handle the increased capacity. Internal Road Design: The application assures that one off- street parking space will be provided for the employee unit. The applicant should also assure that one off-street parking space is provided for each bedroom within the principle dwelling unit, as required under sub -section 3-8.13(a)(3) of the land use code. The floor plan submitted does not define bedrooms, so I am unable to determine if adequate parking is provided. H A R R Y T E A R C H 1 T E C T r � �aaa tSA � A ASPEN, CO'. 81811 3i�8�925.2f55 �I December 1, 1989 Pitkin County Planning & Zonine 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Berky\Farver Residence STATEMENT OF CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 3-8.13 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING CODE The proposed employee dwelling unit is to be 498 square feet gross floor area as measured to the outside face of exterior walls, and is to be attached to the principal dwelling. The principal dwelling has a gross floor area of 6600 square feet and has been awarded a building permit and is currently under construction. The employee unit is to be an "efficiency unit", with bedroom area common to living area. There is to be one off street parking space for the employee unit. Respectfully submitted, Christopher Melton Design Architect CM:rdb George J. Berky Suzanne Farver 360 Gilpin Street Denver, Colorado 80218 November, io, 1969 Board of County Commissioners Pitkin County, Colorado To Whom I� May Concern: We have appointed Harry Teague Architects to represent us in the application for an employee dwelling unit for the property located at 0114 M$adowlark Lane, legally described as: Traoti 7, Amended White Star Ranches Subdivision and P.U.D., as described on the plat thereof recorded in plat book 17 at page 32. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado ,rY tru3 y, (----�Sugnne Farver e ge J. F(i�rky .,'0... 1. WARRANTY DEED -- -- GUY F,_GEQV) R n.o.. I•I whore addnas i;, RR #1 , ROWLEY, "County of BUCHANAN IOWA 5232V State of tier the cunsidvtulion of m TEN AND NO/ 100 ($10. 00) dollars• in h:uttl p;iid, herchy sclhsl andrlmveyfsllo GEORGE J. BERKY and SUZANNE FARVER, as joint tenants, Hhosc icrat uddre,. is 360 GILPIN STREET, DENVER, County of DENVER and Stnte of COLORADO 80218 the Iirlluwin,• real pruperty in the Cuunly ol• PITRIN , and State of Colorado, to wit: TRACT 7, AMENDED WHITE STAR RANCHES SUBDIVISION AND P.U.O_r AS DESCRIBED ON THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 17 AT PAGE 32. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO STATE DOCUMENTARY;,' alto known by street :md number as w;eh atl ilv ;q�purlcn;uiAr�, and �e:urunt(sl the tide to the name,--bicel to THOSE NATTERS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "44 ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Signed ihi, 3rd tiny of August 19 87 A+y1GD yQ' 'trl>.-Sf or GROVER 4 �11y1 X COLOkADO .. S"t"NIT CN` 0L)tX1&YCCKI. Comity of Pi Cki 55. 'fhe forogotnit imuvmcni vtuN al:knowicdgcd before me this 3rd day nl" August . 19 87 Iry (MY F. GROVFR. My commission expires vInuent J. H1genNHo4&-y Ptolc My COmmWOian expire 12(2$Mi OM & Hopklne AxpAin. GOknede MCI t '11' In Dc ,%,,; in., , z "1-i1j nuJ.'. No. 897. 1tcv. 12-85, W.\kH,\YIi1,,❑ISIr�l Fornd IhaJl!,rJt`a�li�0ing.5P25 lxAc1ml,00Tp2N-0(17)2.Ufi9W 0-81 n { 4' 3 EXHIBIT "A" Except general unpaid taxes and assessments for 1987 and subsequent years payable in 1983 and subsequent years; the right of the proprietor of a vain or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate Or intersect the premises, and right of way for ditchcs or canals constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved in United States Patent of record; an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas and other minerals as reserved in Deed from Henry L. and Marjorie B. Stein, recorded September 9, 1963 in Book 203 at Page 561; right of way easement and agreement as described to Thomas McCary in instrument recorded September 9, 1971 in Book 257 at Page 678; terms, Conditions, obligations, and provisions of Protective Covenants for White Star Ranches Subdivision as set forth in instrument recorded August 27, 1980 in Book 393 at Page 811, and Amendment to Protective Covenants for White Star Ranches Subdivision recorded September 12, 1980 in Book 394 at Page 967, and Protective Covenants (Amended March 25, 1985) for White Star Ranches Subdivision recorded June 7, 1985 in Book 487 at Page 450; terms, conditions, obligations, and provisions of Easement Agreement as sot forth in instrument recorded April 12, 1979 in Book 366 at Page 481, and Short Form Easement as set forth in instrument recordod December 9, 1982 in Book 437 at Page 32; terms, conditions, obligations, and provisions of Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, granting a Lot Line Adjustment to the White Star Ranches Subdivision/PUD, Resolution No. 85-30, as set forth in instrument recorded Mauch 28, 1985 in Book 483 at Page 584; terms, conditions, obligations, and provisions of Private Road Access Agreement as set forth in instrument recorded June 1, 1983 in Book 446 at Page 119; and rights of way and easements and other matters as set fortis and contained on the Amended White Star Ranches Subdivision and P.U.D. Plat recorded in Plat Book 17 at Page 32, all in the records of the Clark and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. H A R R V T E G U E A R C H -10 S. GALENA ASPEN,CO 616/1 303-925-2556 December 17, 1989 Pitkin County Planning & Zoning 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Berky\Farver Residence List of Property Owners adjacent to Tract 7, White Star Ranch Sub Division, Pitkin County, CO: North and East of Tract 7 Carol Craig 1814 Woody Creek Road .-Reed 18 /3v 5c South of Tract 7 (Tract 6) William Hitchcock 520 Broadway Suite 250 Santa Monica, CA 90401 West of Tract 7 (Tract 8) Patrick Lally 122 Lakeview Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 P p 0T 15 aNtt R-5 R-7 C,9 3.892 AC. 2.530 AC. Z,F4 R-6 3 7 I q A C. C-3 T P-4 R-4 L2 28 AC. 5 21 2 AC. 2.3 YI AC. VE pR� V 2.000 R - 3 2. 150 AC. Oc) R-8 8 AC R-2 3.064 AC. R-I -A 4.503 At. N rO 25 E a I W.12' I 0 R- 2.6 7 P-3 P-2 - - - 3.961 At - _P-1 _ - - - -- "� n R-26 3.204 AC. 3.472 AC. i 2.601 AC. P-8 3 .13 5 AC. I N88° 02 E 205.31 N 8B°02' E 1291 .14 LOT 19 R-48 3.790 AC. R-27 3.075 AC 3. 085 AC. Sa r I t WEST 39.35 5 B9^ E '\\ R - 4 7 1 nG7 '�s .170 AC. LOT 4 1 -R- 33 ;TAR D SIX LOT 3 . 2.2°° AC. LOT 2 w ° ti0 CO MON " R - 4 6 ; �° w STA W 502 6 1 0 AC. 0 m i ^ � P-33 u e I 2.307 4C. R-41 P O �' ro N -00 W 3�105 AC \ V1 ° 26 N 69° � >Q 3B 2p8.8 V 3 323z eq _ W z QQ R-39 °y2 j O_ � 3.175 AC. V' .� � 0 ' Pam, f O 5N �. R-32 5 79 -38 ° AC 3p3. T 3 N e °]7'W ttb R-37 6.186 AC. R-36 R-35 6.197 AC. 3.258 At /ARWOOD F UR 0 z o h o 0 a N81°4]E 122.82 C �p ybb qe R - 45 J 3, 017 AC, R-3 4 41 2- 2.809 At. na,} jt 6 83°08' e 1' 488. 38 o P N = N � b ab E?y° ti LOT 8 e pqqft-39 ----- ---�----------�-1 ' . \Ml>f .' /.<1'5\0lt-1(,• •· l : .... ,ME-,, 1:>\01Nt>· \ \\------,\ L.�-�\ ' j' i': -� ------- - --· - r·- ---- ----- ---- -------4 �-'. -· --·-. -- _,_,,_ -- ��----i.,,.- �-- -- -- - ----#·---_,.,Jµ_,..,j..-----·--- - ---·-------·-- --- -----'--------- -- - _ _j__1_ --- - -- ___ 1, - - -----,,,,,. -·- -- ------ -- --------- - -- - --.1 -- -- - ---- --i j Ii I IL_.,,._ - ---�----..... - __,,,_,_..,,,...., ___ � I[-Jr!::::-1i h i' i' : @IW��I :-.--@ :;lb iJ'.fH l;:i..e!VA,116 N 15!-EMPLOY!;:�---� -__ ........, .¼t-''"' 1 -o Tfl I l _____.\I!=· =::;:::-···:::;:· ·-::,';· ==�=-=· ··;:;::· ='I•;:;::-. ;;;:::·=--�:;;;;;:-�·-·�._),�_j:_�.:;';';;;-��;;:;;;;· �:__. I I I·j ' i I . . . j r.�-�----,.,-----....,..._., ---·----. -.-. -.,---�-rr----------, !--· ·-·· -.-.-·-.·----··----··----· -··---� --,.,.-1_.__i_ - --'----- ___ _j_ \ / I \ \ ' -----===-'I ' �--� -----� • . I iYti?:f I 'f'O--;i\()/NL, ... ' A--/ \ I ! \\\ \ \ \---- I I \ i i i iIi I l-.--- -, I -- - - - / , - - --,1 -- _,___ --- .. -----·- --�------ [_ - -L.. --- J___ - - -- - --- -- ·····- --- - -,�- --·· -w e:M f'!-0 y i;i?-Ea _ lJJ;l rT 1/4-;?:0 11 (i,!lf,liU'At. NO,io',: 1, l'Ori1. T<PicM., Wl<w 1.oi-1<\>1!'.'ll�,,.,,I (&ir�iz,oic) ':i!:6 1/A·<l ,, f-'q .,,.;r W..Ui.\110"1 VJ) !}'i-' IZ\GitD ,N<;U!,., �fl,il!J� � ei;.2,f;t .1-PD!? 'i'!'l'IUI\. WF ��1'141. _ , �& _';./A,q ...... wi� �HP �f\;, JM'¢J\..t,:notJ ofl 'i"1lArn"1"' WI R-,,o urr 1'i'J-lk, 1, "\D\t,;1_.. ';,qY'( µ,fA.\�D M!.'C-A:c 4{0 �'it� 10fA'� \,ION -,;,o�rn C,,\Hf", AQfi/1, , cl':>, S !i</'it-, 1,10,I «iv�� .:,i.A½ A!l:14\ l"O>! ��W'l<l'rlii<l)h\l\' , ?,,'lo Of' U\Jlf l>e!liA Hl'i\lf fOTA\,. 'Sis 1"7 l"O\i W){)',,l, .;, 11-?';'\ SQ'i'T NfilN " >-IOl-\ ·W\lT,! ,:.�, � ' B'Z-2,"> >'1 Pi }\�W <i,i;lt,,<, AfUi>, 10TAI.. I', I I .'l, "t,, OP 10T!,1.. \.l�\;!(4 lo,11(Si", / .. ,' i ) ,- �I (/).{ .. /�-i '.,,_ "'. "":-, "' ' !';i. i "I I l / I ! 0 ' / / ! -4'-o'' I ·i (")-·· --! \.� ___ .,, ; () ' / ! ! .. ··�. ' ' -' !•., -_ ' ! Ill \-- I :1 0, 0 <( r t" Z. . '.:) �·· � z- . I--- Cl. ., �. . ' ! --� . . •, · .. · I - . . . . l � . -�-,;.---- j l ! I ,.-... ,_. i¼.:_ ·,'<·:':'",..,: · l -i .. f ·· 1.. .··_ l yw.�.• ug�. y��p �x.4 bp�s� eg�,{.e . 4 8 i Sr Yo4 J`tl C 8 19 . r �y SIZE DETAILS WEA- HAD R � R K � X MARK TYPE MFIG GAT, , NTY. FRAME SIZE � .`� S GPG. M. TYPETHER {RYµw THK. X H' M FIG. MEAD THR JAMB OTHER STRIP. GAP, P , yy g� g,,g pp �� .. s t� . It A I� #-X � f'l , ..}.. � C9TH R>`..r, : r' r•, r r' t : :,. , ',�'`,.,':.' .`i f...,, 4,.- F«', Lt '. i19 �Z., r. .F t' ,,�•� 1 6 1 n 'a°,=1. ry r e --.. : r• , f ,q..�a•...• ^ 'ram a.. r !.Jj .3� e � � L � #r C'A Y.�"" i ✓ x.o, F �°' ..r t , r ... .r .S' .. ••` i.r" } S. .� ..,7:.,t.'�' .- _•^'ii! fw 1 Cam--• :w- O 'Ci ry'^-"rr , e "T 1 , , b c= » > V X ' W r .. K . � .✓''. , . , i" < f' .,:.. �:F ,r' � _, „i�, M t.". r-n:i t y ., f Y N L? s'`7 } r + t+ _ ,+'. ! c�7 'Z `n -. .. .. .. .. .. W. a .. ,. ,,, .». ...,, ..... ....... ... ....... .. .. .. .,.. ._...... ...v.. ... ... .. ... - ,.... „ ... ....,_ ,... .., ... , �`> �, yy�tj- o' , f` ��. a ; ;•� 'P � ��= �i�, �}°. �.`.a f'; . ,rSrt�lt�i t t7 �•^�' � � i { }' x � °- iG''t° �� `> Q }} i , . gg zd Cs K "7 1 - „ 6 f T K,'« f.... t„o».,a I 1 •i w. , , 7 i } CA # G :�E ? �b (? "k`" .r,r �:d • Ci 2: � , � �'f, i �'z, - _, �. ,< �: �'- ... ,. �= ;�, �'+ ,a f G rt { x �w t, • „•6 f F A 't a n' .. ,_, . < ... ... ... ...... ... ..,....... . ^ ... _... ... _.._.... . _._. ..,... _ .... , .. ....., . _ - . _. , .., _ ,.. .......,, .,.,.. _, .. ..... .. ...... ._,.. , „_.,-�^� (_ t t !ems r^• o*^� r� .- J{µ�� i f .: 4,'~.+•�" ',J'�t '��'f t�tr °^''�` i ��'t.. d � � � ��'«7i"'� 1 I`��i»+i•..+� !tea•. 4M'�.J� *...°•on^ i/ � t» i+a X •-�:4 wit � � �� .. >'`�: , Fo" 6 > ,r r: 'a _ — r� t , { : -r P r� r t� Ml. + ;li '. , . � : }.-,e'`es,�d ,, ; i�...., (r �, f r�'.,.'y� "�", ,w ➢:? � _„k' "ri,. , .:i.. � � Y Y'" F�• i .�,. ";.-� �..�. C-,., &et ( "9 �"e '.- tL% t err t i f i v , :« r > 4 �� ,,, •"t<•� F n t tt Y'' .. 't.•'. % t~ a-,•,:.+. "� .,- ��., ,w.�»-._.».K.- 'tttrEf # � �•'t.�.,.t ,ra.�. i � ` � t # t�':'� t W L� as G Xt+ r> ttom�•�' gg �R q ^°p a w-L,..r e�K•'. C:Ffv`� ,..L, S 9 % E ,>„,r r F•-3 'i 16 • � ,., N y y'r .. "..,. ,� '-E Jig s`t, `i'r'.{,, 1,.,' !'°� ` •-..ls 4 't `� �•'y i #f ..;' , ,s : <ty ,r .,.. ' G• r •., ., .."5 � ., i;* ',M1 ` `,+ g ,: .,, v+rr 9i rat ""t,;•_�r>`,,, r: .�a ,. r:.. ".i:`, "` ��r 'r t (ta , , ' s � G� . »t'-•s.. a '' t ep it st? tT '¢„^�:,.. `; ° ': F'"t ,... � �,.+^"., 3.,v�'s. � :::5, n � ,a. .s«"' r. Fao',,:"*""-."4,E;. e"`" 'wa .(.'^,.:'=.a'.; s „ss',;sue" r n,., e.. '�S*e z.'."rZ+,c .. .. ._.,„_,_...,....,,....._...,..,_.>•.�._...,_,.,. ..,,,,,......._.,-....,w .. :f < J t p h, } cw t ten`-` c✓'�I /,..''.c:'«1d+. / „'?„A Xj;y tt '9C rCA, i} ._.,... ._. ... - ., i..�. 4-,fit � ♦y 4d x' f i' , : , , ' r Ew(F 4 , .,...-,. n,rnw., _..., ...._-,..w,..-v _w,_.- v.vn-..,.,_»,.. ,-..._,.,r,_.,,_»_.-..�-,,,..,_,...__.vn_,.<.....,,,.,. .. ._:.... .. ... .. ..... v.,._...,, .,. ,,.. ....__-•-.,_+....e,..-,v.,......_...-.--.,,._.v.w_...w-_ .,i , r µ v 5 , 2 # t a. �s 3 F i , d dy,L 'm/ +;''4 � j . ^. ; : " . i ,2 j i f £ i"_.", „, .,.� `'t �•� ? i 3 �, � '{ Fe g,.d.� r� i ( Cr' yyyy qqj (* q Nf 3• E{ b..at -.,.r , � � [ ,j ":,,. ,,. [•,, <,«,. , l y,: t: , ,. � � ,. ff � F' t `;! i{ r 1 j i 11 , .. 'f .y ij } 4 L r _ , : r , • r it ii t �• !' i S• F R' .:,, t 1 s t j ( f x s>F i , r , i r v , ; :.,_... .. ... ... .. -. ., ,,,. [r. f F i$ ': �� " t { }", i f 3 j JL' YY 0 f, :... 1 . l ' ' 1"" `" ',t' � r. f .. } �.... .. ...... .._. rt .... ._. _.. ,,..._,.,v-.._.,..., _ . ,. , S•, ev n w. � �y .. }(� Mt ,+yt„ "` f , , . > , i' , I : i t i E f pj d < - ., ir— " , .E; t3 E' 7 t f Ewa j i }> f { , : s : s < r ;f { � . t F> ; +F S' r r .S t 3 #{y i t n} p , < f , r f # �. _.,.? a C { f> t ( H' $ a S F i s tt r , , ,w !i }} }}P• tt t rj j££ M. i j7 'i E 1 j $ j ! f? F' �a ,k E,. 4 < I f E k S +f 3 d yE; i :3 E €. I ,....,.._,_.i:_l__7__llt 72"'tz"',.. r { i {tk r rf� 1 it t E 1$f # i S { {� i E A� X s { t r 3 M i Aa '}. ! q c t t xxtt >~i: .14 �. ws .kj 4PwGt5'. k fi i { s. , r/ 3 t ft , t 1 y , u 411 i 4n . _ _. s� # } , l,,,,,, Stt t+s %i xl�l4 r1 { Sk 1 .\1 t t� {1 r t ,n 4 i # <Lr' Y t E 11 {} 4 -''x 1 �vl � �> ii n yjpmQ� + S # #i _ 't " P✓ } „> ' .P^ "+airy {,OA' i/': �„ ^~..�„+, r w._ 1. I [(. Y ' # { 1 't t ..,_,mod' xrh-'^^";' : ,,,a,r_..,k„,. ,«,l,...i'�ii?7 ti' { ,�+.: , ...' $,::s2,-., . a 1 # y., ,r). 1�.,#=,':. Y✓/ra>I.iR., '„ r . ' .+r.�ay,,a¢,!cc5 ,viv.✓ 4„k, fr✓ :y:a,% :.,w.» I-, -,-,,I .n ,onr., r. .. �,.rc,:., ;tr �, I w ...,. 4. r u �$ �Y� x� / - € : n . .•. 3 i1 t + S f k+ ,, ., .. ..,.,. ... .. ... ........ . x ,fax E ,� 4. I �a + a / ;< 1.i , , „ " < ` • .k j : jj//��}} p $ �j, :3 �`'` .. t. , . � .�J'SP . ... • 1. ..� . ., I .. ,. I . . -:� . . . .. � �. .1 ... I I . . . A--7 M SeCTIO!Q "A" ZZ.." f, - F , rp H t a { 1 = t ! ' \l x+v�...�-�, ter,., .. . , ... .. � .. .. .. ... ... ..... .. . . . ... .. , « _ WAS. fit ! :: f d� f £: {r' �t`Y� ifs r li�i 13 04 3 t n �v - > It 1 r f wom ail VV q. W7. f- Tj - - L -------- 4 UNIT , " _.. , : .: , n