HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.con.031.258.4.22 CDD
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Contractor:
Budget Line Item:12740100.531000
-
-
-
Procurement Method:
Type:
Contract Effective Date:
Contract End Date:
Contract Type:
Retainage/Bonding:
County Representative:Andrew Knapp County Rep. Phone #:(970) 319-2632
Department:
Provide a brief description of the Contract or Change Order:
$ 199,991.00
$ -
$ -
$ 199,991.00
031.25
Pitkin County
Contract Cover Sheet
Formal
Services/Maintenance
5/1/2025
4/30/2026
New Contract
Please fully allocate New Contract
Total if there are multiple codes
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 199,991.00
If this is a new Vendor, please enter the New Vendor information into Munis for workflow approval and include a complete W-9.
Contact Information for Pitkin County Contract/Project Lead:
Contract Information
Public Works
Planning and Project Management Support Services for AABC Multimodal Transportation study.
Original Contract Amount:
Previous Change Order/Amendment Amount(s):
This Change order/Amendment Amount:
Contract Total:
Contract Value Summary:
No
AABC Multimodal Transportation Planning Services
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
$ 199,991.00
Project #: 031.25 Rev. 2022.08.04 CDD
NOTICE OF AWARD
Date: May 8, 2025
To: Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
Matthew Kaufman, AICP
101 SW Main Street, Suite 2000
Portland, OR 97204
RE: RFP 031.25 – AABC Multimodal Transportation Plan
The County, having duly evaluated the Proposal submitted on February 7, 2025 for the
work or purchase in response to the Request for Proposal Document titled AABC
Multimodal Transportation Plan in the amount of One-Hundred Ninety-Nine thousand
Nine-Hundred Ninety-One dollars and Zero cents ($199,991.00), and it appearing that the
Price and other information in your Proposal Form is fair, equitable and to the best
interest of the County, hereby accepts and awards the Project to your organization.
In accordance with the terms of the Contract Documents, you are required to execute the
Contract within ten (10) consecutive days from this Notice of Award or within ten (10)
days following successful Contract negotiations, whichever shall occur sooner.
In addition, you are required to furnish in the said time a complete W-9 along with
Certificates of Insurance evidencing compliance with the requirement for insurance as
stated in the Contract Documents.
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
_____________________________________________________
!#COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE#! Date
Receipt of the above Notice of Award is hereby acknowledged
_____________________________________________________
!#VENDOR SIGNATURE#! Date
Andrew Knapp
County Engineer
May-08-2025
Vice President, as duly authorized
Katie Mangle
May-13-2025
Contract # 031.25 Revision: 2025.05.08 CDD
iso 8601
1
PITKIN COUNTY CONTRACT FOR PROVISION OF SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT, made May 2, 2025 by and between the Board of County Commissioners of
Pitkin County, Colorado, 530 E. Main St., Suite #302, Aspen, CO 81611, (hereinafter called the
“County”) and Alta Planning + Design, Inc., 101 SW Main Street, Suite 2000, Portland, OR
97204 (hereinafter called the “Contractor”) to perform the following work: AABC
Multimodal Transportation Planning Services (“Project”).
I.Term of Contract: The term of this Contract is from May 1, 2025 to April 30, 2026. At
the expiration of the initial term, the contract may be extended for additional terms of
one (1) year increments by the express written consent of both parties through
completion of the Project.
II.Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor shall perform its services under this Contract with
the professional skill and care consistent with that ordinarily provided by consultants
practicing within the same or similar disciplines (Standard of Care). Contractor will
work closely with Project Lead and identified stakeholders in the planning and delivery
of incremental and final reporting for a multimodal travel study and recommendations
for the areas and transportation considerations defined in the RFP and proposal
documents, incorporated herein as Attachments A and B, respectively. Work shall be
performed according to the provided schedule and per the task deliverables defined in
the attached documentation and/or as agreeable to Project Lead and Contractor. Any
work performed outside of the provided scope and/or in addition to such must be
communicated to and approved by Project Lead in written Change Order/Contract
Amendment prior to commencement of work and billable per the rates and fees
provided in Attachment B.
III.Compensation and Expenses, Invoicing, Payment and Offset. The County shall
compensate Contractor for its services in accordance with the Project Budget and
Schedule set out in Paragraph II. It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event
will the total compensation and reimbursement to be paid hereunder exceed the sum of
One-Hundred Ninety-Nine thousand Nine-Hundred Ninety-One dollars and Zero cents
($199,991.00) for all services rendered. By contract or amendment, the County and
Contractor may reallocate the budget among project tasks if the total budget amount
remains unchanged. Contractor shall invoice for the project monthly based on hours
Contract # 031.25 Revision: 2025.05.08 CDD
iso 8601
2
worked, with payment expected within thirty (30) days of invoice. Should the County
dispute any portion of an invoice, or has cause for offset or adjustment, County will
notify Contractor of such disputed items within Fifteen (15) days of County’s receipt
of invoice. Any payment by the County may be offset by any amount the Contractor
owes the County for any reason, pending the correction of non-conforming Services or
other performance deficiencies and/or defaults within a Fifteen (15) day correction
period from the date of County’s dispute notice being issued.
IV.County’s Exclusive Ownership of Work Product. Drawings, specifications,
guidelines and other documents prepared by Contractor in connection with this
Contract shall be the property of the County upon payment according to the terms of
this Contract. However, Contractor shall have the right to utilize such documents in
the course of its marketing, professional presentations, and for other business purposes.
Contractor assigns to County the copyrights to all work prepared, developed, or created
pursuant to this Contract, including the right to: 1) reproduce the work; 2) prepare
derivative works; 3) distribute copies to the public; 4) perform the works publicly; and
5) to display the work publicly. In the event that any of Contractor’s Work Product are
modified and subsequently used or reused in any respect without Contractor’s
involvement and oversight, the County hereby agrees to release, indemnify, and, to the
furthest extent under applicable Law(s), hold Contractor, its officers, employees, and
consultants harmless against any claims or damages arising from the reuse or
modification of said Work Product. Contractor shall have right to use materials
produced in the course of this Contract for marketing purposes and professional
presentations, articles, speeches and other business purposes.
V.Pitkin County’s Obligations. Pitkin County shall administer this Contract through
a County Representative. Andrew Knapp, County Engineer will manage the project as
the County’s Representative. In the event that Andrew Knapp is not available, an
alternate representative will be appointed who shall assume the County
Representative’s duties. The services provided and products delivered by the
Contractor under this Contract will be subject to review by the County’s
Representatives, or a designee, for compliance with Contractor’s obligations prior to
final payment.
VI.Termination Prior to Expiration of Contract Term. The County has the right to
terminate this Contract, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the
Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. Such notice
shall be given at least ten (10) days before the effective date of such termination. In
such event all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies and reports prepared by
the Contractor pursuant to this Contract shall become the County’s property. Contractor
shall be entitled to receive compensation in accordance with the Contract for any
satisfactory work completed pursuant to the terms of this Contract prior to the date of
termination. Notwithstanding the above, Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to
Contract # 031.25 Revision: 2025.05.08 CDD
iso 8601
3
the County for damages sustained by the County by virtue of any breach of the Contract
by the Contractor. Contractor shall not be responsible for claims, losses or damages
arising out of any changes made by others to the Instruments of Service without
Contractor’s input or approval, or any use of Instruments of Service which are not
complete at the time of transfer. Contractor may terminate this Agreement by written
notice for cause, in whole or in part, if County breaches or fails to pay Contractor in
accordance with this Agreement and, following notice, fails to cure or begin to cure
such breach or failure within Fifteen (15) days of receipt of notice from Contractor.
VII. Independent Contractor Status.
A. The parties to this Contract intend that the relationship between them contemplated
by the Contract is that of independent contractor. Contractor, and any agent,
employee, or servant of Contractor shall not be deemed to be an employee, agent,
or servant of Pitkin County.
B. Contractor is not required to offer his services exclusively to Pitkin County under
this Contract. Contractor may choose to work for other individuals or entities
during the term of this Contract, provided that the basic services and deliverable
products required under this Contract are submitted in the manner and on the
schedule defined under this Contract.
C. Contractor warrants that all work produced will conform to all applicable industry
standard of care, skill and diligence in the performance of Contractor’s obligations
under this Contract.
D. Contractor shall not attempt to oversee or supervise the work or actions of any
Pitkin County employee, servant or agent in the course of completing work under
this Contract.
E. Contractor is not entitled to any Workers’ Compensation benefits through Pitkin
County and is responsible for payment of any federal, state, FICA and other income
taxes.
VIII. Assignability. This Contract is not assignable by either party. Any use of
subcontractors by the Contractor for performance of this Contract must be accepted in
writing by the County.
IX. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Contract shall be held to be invalid
or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Contract shall remain valid and
binding upon the parties hereto.
X. Integration and Modification.
A. This Contract represents the entire and integrated Contract between the County and
the Contractor and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or contract,
either written or oral. This Contract may be amended only by written contract
signed by both the County and the Contractor.
Contract # 031.25 Revision: 2025.05.08 CDD
iso 8601
4
B. The County may, from time to time, request changes in the scope of services of the
Contractor to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including the increase or
decrease in the amount of the Contractor’s compensation, which are mutually
agreed upon between the County and the Contractor, shall be in writing and upon
execution shall become part of this Contract.
XI. Indemnity.
A. To the furthest extent allowable under applicable law(s), the Contractor agrees to
indemnify, hold harmless and, not excluding the County's right to participate,
defend the County, its subsidiary, parent, associated and/or affiliated entities,
successors, or assigns, its elected officials, trustees, employees, agents, volunteers,
and any jurisdiction or agency issuing permits for any work included in the project,
hereinafter referred to as indemnitee, from all suits and claims, including attorney's
fees and cost of litigation, actions, loss, damage, expense, cost or claims of any
character or any nature arising out of the work done in fulfillment of the terms of
this Contract or on account of any act, claim or amount arising or recovered under
workers' compensation law or arising out of the failure of the Contractor to conform
to any statutes, ordinances, regulation, law or court decree. It is agreed that the
Contractor will be responsible for primary loss investigation, defense and judgment
costs where this Contract of indemnity applies. In consideration of the award of
this Contract, the Contractor agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the
County its subsidiary, parent, associated and/or affiliated entities, successors, or
assigns, its elected officials, trustees, employees, agents, and volunteers for losses
arising from the work performed by the Contractor for the County.
The Contractor’s obligation to indemnify Pitkin County under this Contract shall
in no circumstance be interpreted as a requirement or obligation for Contractor to
indemnify Pitkin County from its’ own negligence or willful wrongdoing.
B. The Contractor further shall investigate, process, respond to, adjust, provide
defense for and defend, pay or settle all claims, demands, or lawsuits related hereto
at its sole expense and shall bear all other costs and expenses related thereto, even
if the claim, demand or lawsuit is groundless, false or fraudulent.
C. Accessibility Indemnification
Contractor shall indemnify, save, and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties,
against any and all costs, expenses, claims, damages, liabilities, court awards and
other amounts (including attorneys’ fees and related costs) incurred by any of the
Indemnified Parties in relation to Contractor’s failure to comply with §§24-85-
101, et seq., C.R.S., or the Accessibility Standards for Individuals with a
Disability as established by OIT pursuant to Section §24-85-103 (2.5), C.R.S.
XII. Accessibility.
i. Contractor shall comply with and the Work Product provided under this Contract
Contract # 031.25 Revision: 2025.05.08 CDD
iso 8601
5
shall be in compliance with all applicable provisions of §§24-85-101, et seq., C.R.S.,
and the Accessibility Standards for Individuals with a Disability, as established by
OIT pursuant to Section §24-85-103 (2.5), C.R.S. Contractor shall also comply with
all State of Colorado technology standards related to technology accessibility and
with Level AA of the most current version of the Web Content Accessibility
Guidelines (WCAG), incorporated in the State of Colorado technology standards.
The County may require Contractor’s compliance to the State’s Accessibility
Standards to be determined by a third party selected by the County to attest to
Contractor’s Work Product and software is in compliance with §§24-85-101, et seq.,
C.R.S., and the Accessibility Standards for Individuals with a Disability as
established by OIT pursuant to Section §24-85-103 (2.5), C.R.S.
XIII.Insurance. Contractor and subcontractors shall procure and maintain until all of their
obligations have been discharged, including any warranty periods under this Contract
are satisfied, insurance against claims for injury to persons or damage to property which
may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
The insurance requirements herein are minimum requirements for this Contract and in
no way limit the indemnity covenants contained in this Contract. The policies shall
include, or be endorsed to include, the following provision: On insurance policies
where the County is named as an additional insured, the County shall be an additional
insured to the full limits of liability purchased by the Contractor even if those limits of
liability are in excess of those required by this Contract.
The County in no way warrants that the minimum limits contained herein are sufficient
to protect the Contractor from liabilities that might arise out of the performance of the
work under this Contract by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees, or
subcontractors. The Contractor shall assess its own risks and if it deems appropriate
and/or prudent, maintain higher limits and/or broader coverages. The Contractor is not
relieved of any liability or other obligations assumed or pursuant to the Contract by
reason of its failure to obtain or maintain insurance in sufficient amounts, duration, or
types. Commercial General Liability Completed Operations coverage must be kept in
effect for up to three (3) years after completion of the project.
A.Coverage and Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall provide coverage with limits
of liability requirements provided that the coverage is written on a “following form”
basis.
1)Statutory Workers’ Compensation: Colorado statutory minimums
a.Policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation against the County.
b.This requirement shall not apply when a contractor or subcontractor
is exempt under Colorado Workers’ Compensation Act AND when
such contractor or subcontractor executes the appropriate sole
proprietor waiver form.
Contract # 031.25 Revision: 2025.05.08 CDD
iso 8601
6
Minimum Limits:
Coverage A (Workers’ Compensation) Statutory
Coverage B (Employers Liability) $ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
2)Commercial General Liability – ISO 1CG 0001 form or equivalent.
(With County named as an additional insured)
Minimum Limits:
General Aggregate $ 2,000,000
Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $ 2,000,000
Each Occurrence Limit $ 1,000,000
Personal/Advertising Injury $ 1,000,000
Fire Damage (Any One Fire) $ 50,000
Medical Payments (Any One Person) $ 5,000
Coverage to include:
•Premises and Operations
•Explosions, Collapse and Underground Hazards
•Personal / Advertising Injury
•Products / Completed Operations
•Liability assumed under an Insured Contract (including defense costs assumed under
contract)
•Independent Contractors
•Designated Construction Project(s) General Aggregate Limit, ISO CG 2503 (1997
Edition or equivalent)
•Additional Insured—Owners, Lessees or Contractors Endorsement, ISO Form 2010
(2004 Edition or equivalent)
•Additional Insured—Owners, Lessees or Contractors Endorsement, ISO CG 2037
(2004 Edition or equivalent)
•The policy shall be endorsed to include the following additional insured language
on the Additional Insured Endorsements specified above: “County, its subsidiary,
parent, associated and/or affiliated entities, successors, or assigns, its elected
officials, trustees, employees, agents, and volunteers named as an additional insured
with respect to liability and defense of suits arising out of the activities performed
by, or on behalf of the Contractor, including completed operations”.
3)Auto Liability: Bodily injury and property damage for any owned,
hired and non-owned vehicles used in the performance of this Contract.
Minimum Limits: Statutory
Contract # 031.25 Revision: 2025.05.08 CDD
iso 8601
7
Coverage Bodily/Property Damage (Each Accident) $ 1,000,000
4) Special Coverages (check as appropriate and insert amount):
a. ☐ Performance Bond $
b. ☐ Professional Errors and Omissions
c. ☐ Aircraft Liability
d. ☐ Owner’s Protective
e. ☐ Builder’s Risk
f. ☐ Boiler and Machinery
g. ☐ Loss of Use Insurance
h. ☐ Pollution Liability
i. ☐ Crime, including Employee Dishonesty Coverage, or Fidelity
Bond
B. Proof of Insurance:
1) Each insurance policy required by the insurance provisions of this
Contract shall provide the required coverage and shall not be suspended,
voided or canceled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been
given to the County, except when cancellation is for non-payment of
premium, then ten (10) days prior notice may be given. Such notice shall
be emailed directly to Procurement@pitkincounty.com. If the insurance
carrier will not provide the required notice, the Consultant/Contractor and
or its insurance broker shall notify the County of any cancellation, or
reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance within seven (7) days of
receipt of insurers’ notification to that effect. Simultaneously with the
Certificates of Insurance, the Contractor shall file with the Project Lead a
certified statement to disclose existing claims pending against the required
coverages, inclusive of any reserves established on account of such claims,
defense costs expended and amounts remaining on policy limits which would
cause the remaining coverage amount to fall below the required limits as listed
in Section XIII.A.
2) In addition, these Certificates of Insurance shall contain the following
clauses:
a. The contractor’s insurance shall be primary and non-contributory with
any insurance or self-insurance purchased by the County.
b. The insurance companies issuing the policy or policies hereunder shall
have no recourse against the County of Pitkin for payment of any
premiums or for assessments under any form of policy.
c. Any and all deductibles or self-insured retentions in the above-
described insurance policies shall be assumed by and be for the
amount of, and at the sole expense of the Contractor.
d. Location of operations shall be: “all operations and locations at which
work for the referenced Project is being done.”
Contract # 031.25 Revision: 2025.05.08 CDD
iso 8601
8
3)Certificates of Insurance for all renewal policies shall be delivered to
the County’s Representative prior to a policy’s expiration date except for any
policy expiring on the expiration date of this Contract or thereafter.
4)The County reserves the right to request and receive a copy of any
policy and any policy endorsement at any time during the term of this
Contract.
XIV.Exemptions and Preferences. All purchases of construction or building or any other
materials for this Contract shall not include Federal Excise Taxes or Colorado State or
local sales or use taxes. Pitkin County is exempt from such taxes under registration
numbers 98-02624 and 84-78000-5k.
XV.Records. The Contractor shall maintain comprehensive, complete and accurate
books, records, and documents concerning its performance relating to this Contract for
a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Contract and the County shall
have the right within the three (3) year period to inspect and audit these books, records
and documents, upon demand, in a reasonable manner and at reasonable times, for the
purpose of determining, by accepted accounting and auditing standards, compliance
with all provisions of the Contract and applicable law.
XVI.Contract Made in Colorado. The parties agree that this Contract was made in
accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and shall be so construed. Venue is
agreed to be exclusively in the courts of Pitkin County, Colorado.
XVII.Attorney’s Fees. In the event that legal action is necessary to enforce any of the
provisions of this Contract, the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs
and reasonable attorney’s fees.
XVIII.Governmental Immunity. Contractor agrees and understands that Pitkin County is
relying on and does not waive, by any provision of this Contract, the monetary
limitations or terms (presently $150,000 per person and $600,000 per occurrence) or
any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental
Immunity Act, 24-10-101, et seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or otherwise
available to Pitkin County or any of its officers, agents or employees. Further, nothing
in this Contract shall be construed or interpreted to require or provide for indemnification
of the Contractor by the County for any injury to any person or any property damage
whatsoever which is caused by the negligence or other misconduct of the County or its
agent or employees.
XIX.Current Year Obligations. The parties acknowledge and agree that any payments
provided for hereunder or requirements for future appropriations shall constitute only
currently budgeted expenditures of Pitkin County. Pitkin County’s obligations under
this Contract are subject to Pitkin County’s annual right to budget and appropriate the
Contract # 031.25 Revision: 2025.05.08 CDD
iso 8601
9
sums necessary to provide the services set forth herein. No provisions of the Contract
shall constitute a mandatory charge or requirement in any ensuing fiscal year beyond
the then current fiscal year of Pitkin County. No provision of the Contract shall be
construed or interpreted as creating a multiple-fiscal year direct or indirect debt or other
financial obligation of Pitkin County within the meaning of any constitutional or
statutory debt limitation. This Contract shall not directly or indirectly obligate Pitkin
County to make any payments beyond those appropriated for Pitkin County’s then
current fiscal year. No provisions of this Contract shall be construed to pledge or create
a lien on any class or source of Pitkin County’s moneys, nor shall any provision of this
Contract restrict the future issuance of Pitkin County’s bonds or any obligations
payable from any class or source of Pitkin County’s money.
XX.Notice. Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing
and shall be provided by electronic delivery to the e-mail addresses set forth below and
by one of the following methods 1) hand-delivery or 2) registered or certified mail,
postage pre-paid to the mailing addresses set forth below. Each party by notice sent
under this paragraph may change the address to which future notices should be sent.
Electronic delivery of notices shall be considered delivered upon receipt of
confirmation of delivery on the part of the sender. Nothing contained herein shall be
construed to preclude personal service of any notice in the manner prescribed for
personal service of a summons or other legal process.
with copies to:
Pitkin County Attorney’s Office
530 E. Main St., Suite #301
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Email: Attorney@pitkincounty.com
To Pitkin County:
Andrew Knapp
76 Service Center Rd
Aspen, CO 81611
Email: andrew.knapp@pitkincounty.com
To Contractor:
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
101 SW Main Street, Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97204
Phone: (720) 409-0689
Email: MatthewKaufman@altago.com
Contract # 031.25 Revision: 2025.05.08 CDD
iso 8601
10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Contract as of the date first set out herein
above.
ALTA PLANNING + Design, Inc.
________________________________________________
!#VENDOR SIGNATURE#! Date
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
_________________________________________________
!#DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE#! Date
DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
________________________________________________
!#SECTION LEADER#!Date
COUNTY MANAGER APPROVAL:
________________________________________________
Date
County Engineer
May-08-2025
Andrew Knapp
May-08-2025
Public Works Director
Brian Pettet
Katie Mangle
Vice President, as duly authorized
May-13-2025
Rich Englehart
Deputy County Manager
May-13-2025
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
1
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Elected Officials Transportation Committee (EOTC) of Pitkin County, Town of
Snowmass Village and the City of Aspen is accepting proposals to provide Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan.
More information is available online at www.BidNetDirect.com/Colorado.
Any and all questions, or requests for clarification, must be submitted by 4:00 PM MT on January 24, 2025. Questions and requests for clarification will only be accepted via email at procurement@pitkincounty.com.
Proposal documents must be uploaded to the BidNet Direct website no later than 2:00
PM MT on February 7, 2025.
Published in the Aspen Daily News: 1/13/2025 and 1/20/2025.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
2
PITKIN COUNTY ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER (AABC) MULTIMODAL
TRANSPORTATION PLAN Table of Contents REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. COUNTY BACKGROUND 3 III. SCOPE OF WORK 4 A. PROJECT BACKGROUND/OVERVIEW 4 B. PROJECT TASKS 5
C. CONTRACT TERM AND INFORMATION 7 D. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 7 IV. SELECTION PROCESS 8 A. SUBMITTALS 8 B. TIME SCHEDULE 9
C. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND WEIGHING 10 D. SELECTION COMMITTEE 11 E. CONTRACT 11 PROPOSAL FORM 13 INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS 15
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
3
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER (AABC) MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
GENERAL INFORMATION TO PROPOSERS ISSUED: January 8, 2025 DUE: February 7, 2025
I. INTRODUCTION The Elected Officials Transportation Committee of Pitkin County, Town of Snowmass Village, and the City of Aspen (hereinafter called the “EOTC”) is qualifying interested parties for the provision of Planning Services at the Aspen Airport Business Center, Aspen, CO 81611.
The EOTC will award a one-year contract with the option to renew up to one additional one-year term. II. COUNTY BACKGROUND Covering 975 square miles, Pitkin County, Colorado is located in the heart of the White River National Forest, surrounded by the spectacular peaks of the central Rocky Mountains. With Aspen as the County seat, Pitkin County lies in the eastern “upper” end of the Roaring Fork Valley and includes the communities of Aspen, Snowmass Village, Woody Creek, Old Snowmass, Meredith, Thomasville, Redstone and portions of the town of Basalt. As public servants, we work in the public trust to ensure quality of life and experience in Pitkin County and the Upper Roaring Fork Valley for present and future generations. Organizational Values: Pitkin County embraces the following values to promote public trust and confidence in County Government.
Stewardship: We strive to leave our natural environment, community, public
assets, and organization in better condition than we found them for current and future generations. Ethics: We hold ourselves to high standards of honesty and dependability in the conduct of County business. Excellence: We are committed to providing quality services that are accessible,
accurate and innovative to meet our community’s needs. Collaboration: We work together as employees and with citizens and other
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
4
government, non-profit and private sector organizations helping each other succeed in promoting and achieving the public’s goals. Open Communication: We are committed to listening to our citizens and
partners and to giving accurate and timely information. Positive Work Environment: We appreciate dedicated and knowledgeable employees and support their professional and personal growth. Additional information about the County may be found on the County’s website
at: https://pitkincounty.com/DocumentCenter/View/21997/PC_brochure_2020_FFO_digital
III. SCOPE OF WORK A. PROJECT BACKGROUND/OVERVIEW The Elected Officials Transportation Committee (EOTC) is comprised of the
Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners, City Council of the City of Aspen, and Town Council of the Town of Snowmass Village. The EOTC is leading this project to generate a comprehensive multimodal transportation plan to serve all of the current and future uses of the AABC. The plan will propose infrastructure solutions including cost estimates.
The Aspen Airport Business Center, also known as the “AABC” or the “ABC” is a development approximately three miles west of downtown Aspen, CO and immediately across Hwy 82 from the Aspen Airport. From its conception in the early 1970’s, the development has grown from a business and light industrial park
into what some locals call “a small town without a post office.” The center includes over 300 tenants representing various businesses, over 300 residential units, the Aspen campus of Colorado Mountain College, a fire station, several eateries, a grocery store, gas station/car wash, banking, services including
dentistry and fitness studios, and recreation access to both primitive and paved
trail systems. It is home to several iconic Aspen enterprises including Aspen Ski Company and global ski brand Obermeyer. The AABC sits within Pitkin County, and the roadway network throughout the
development, with the exception of private roads within the North 40
neighborhood, are the jurisdiction of the County. Owing to its inception during an earlier time, no transportation master planning was conducted, particularly for any modes other than motor vehicles. While some sidewalks, crosswalks and bike lanes have been added along the way there is a lack of cohesion and connectivity
in the network and some especially hazardous pedestrian crossing situations.
The need for a multimodal transportation plan with more emphasis on bicyclists and pedestrians has become critical with the addition of a new City of Aspen housing project, the Lumberyard, at the eastern border of the AABC. The
Lumberyard will result in a new traffic signal on Colorado Highway 82 (CO-82)
and the closing of a separate CO-82 vehicle access point in the same vicinity. The new residents of the approximately 300 housing units and existing residents and visitors need safe bicycle and pedestrian access into and throughout the ABC to
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
5
reach businesses, Colorado Mountain College, and RFTA stops that service both the BRT and Valley Local routes.
The development has some existing sidewalks, bike lanes and crosswalks, but the network is incomplete. For example, some roads only have sidewalk along one side and pedestrian crossings lack adequate vehicle controls or are otherwise not designed utilizing best safety practices due to right-of-way constraints and other issues. There are some origins and destinations that require significant out of
direction travel which has led to a proliferation of social trails. There is great potential to upgrade the roadway system for all uses including bicycling and walking due to the 60 feet of County-owned right-of-way, which could accommodate those facilities should this planning process and stakeholder buy-in recommend such upgrades. The goal of this plan is to bring the ABC up to current
standards for multimodal transportation access and safety, to encourage the shift from motor vehicle use to transit, bicycling and walking. Among the critical elements in the plan will be the potential for use of one-way streets, motor vehicle parking analysis and intersection safety.
B. PROJECT TASKS Task 1. Project Management – Consultant will present project management plan with the following elements:
• Contact with EOTC project manager, Regional Transportation Director
• Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings, regularly TBD. Make-up of TAC to include representatives from Pitkin County Road and Bridge, Pitkin County Engineering, the City of Aspen, the Town of Snowmass
Village, CDOT, RFTA, AABC property owners and tenants, AABC
residents, Aspen Fire, Colorado Mountain College and others TBD.
• Public/stakeholder outreach meetings. No more than three outreach events will be held, in person in the Aspen/Snowmass area
• Technical Memoranda. At least three tech memos will be provided during the project, after Task 2, Task 3 and a combined Task 4 & Task 5
• Presentations to EOTC. Consultant will present the Draft and Final reports at two EOTC meetings, dates to be determined. The presentations may be
virtual.
• Draft and Final AABC Multimodal Transportation Plan Task 2. Existing Conditions Analysis -- Consultant will analyze existing
conditions and conduct data collection relevant to understanding bicyclist and
pedestrian access and safety as well as motor vehicle circulation and parking as those elements relate to the goal of a balanced, multimodal transportation system throughout the development and connecting to transportation networks in the area. This analysis will include, but is not limited to, the following:
• Multimodal Gap Analysis – The development patterns at the ABC have resulted in connectivity and access challenges, requiring out of direction travel, indirect bicycling and walking routes, parking and delivery staging
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
6
limitations and hazardous intersections. A gap analysis of all modes will be conducted.
• Bicycling and walking audit – A detailed boots-on-the-ground, complete audit of bicycling and walking access and safety will be conducted.
• Motor vehicle volumes – Much of the data for this section is provided in the 2022 AABC Traffic Impact Study commissioned by Pitkin County.
Consultant is encouraged to suggest additional motor vehicle data
collection as needed to assess all traffic operations in the development.
• Existing Parking Utilization and Patterns to determine where parking is being overutilized leading to illegal parking and conflicts between
neighboring businesses and snow removal challenges.
• Delivery Truck Operations – Determining where delivery vehicles are staging and operating on public Rights of Way to service the local businesses and residents.
• Transit volumes – Data on boarding and alighting data for all RFTA routes, including the BRT, and Valley Local stop near Service Center Rd, and skier buses if any.
• WE-Cycle bike share operations – WE-Cycle staff will provide recent
metrics on use, including origin-destination data as available.
• The Lumberyard residential development infrastructure planning documents – Many years in the planning, the Lumberyard project has produced site planning documents showing access points into the AABC, plus proposed bicycle and pedestrian routes.
• Review of planning and governance documents, including: the EOTC 2020 Strategic Plan; Comprehensive Valley Transportation Plan; 2022 AABC Traffic Impact Study; Aspen Airport Multimodal Plan; Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Brush Creek to AABC connections
project; West of Maroon Plan, recent transportation-related and transit studies from the City of Aspen, Town of Snowmass Village, Pitkin County and the EOTC, TBD The Consultant is encouraged to suggest additional sources of information to fully assess multimodal transportation conditions at the AABC.
• Task 2 Deliverable: Existing Conditions Report. Task 3. Stakeholder and Public Outreach – A diverse community of people
have interest in transportation access and safety at the AABC, such as business
owners/tenants, property owners, residents, employees, customers, the Colorado Mountain College community, Aspen Airport Management, employees of RFTA and Pitkin County on the west end of the development and the general public. With assistance from EOTC staff, the consultant will be responsible for
identifying and contacting representatives of each property and business owner,
and all other stakeholders. In addition, an outreach strategy aimed at the general public is important to identify potential future users of the transportation network at the AABC, including potential residents of the Lumberyard, bicyclists and pedestrians who would use the proposed Brush Creek to AABC bridge/trails
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
7
connections, airport users and visitors accessing the RFTA bus stops, and others. Consultant will propose a plan to gain input and may include targeted stakeholder meetings, social media and other online comment media, public open house
and/or workshop, etc. The stakeholder plan will be created with and approved by the TAC prior to implementation.
• Task 3 Deliverable: Stakeholder and Public Outreach Plan Task 4. Proposed multimodal facilities network -- Consultant will compile a comprehensive plan of proposed multimodal facilities including sidewalks, both protected and traditional bike lanes, bike routes, crossing treatments, grade-separated crossings if needed, wayfinding and bicycle parking. Motor vehicle plan elements may include one-way streets, on-street parking restrictions, new
connections throughout the ABC and delivery staging strategies. The plan will include cost estimates for implementation and consider how to phase its implementation. The draft network plan will be reviewed by the TAC, in preparation for inclusion in the draft AABC Multimodal Transportation Plan.
• Task 4 Deliverable: Tech Memo
Task 5. Draft and Final Reports – Consultant will compile a draft report on recommendations to be reviewed by EOTC staff, the TAC and key stakeholders.
After a review and comment period, consultant will incorporate changes into a
Final Report to be presented to the EOTC at a 2025 meeting, date TBD. General Requirements Bicycling and walking infrastructure planning and design expertise is the top
priority for the selection consultant team, along with the vision and expertise to
balance all transportation needs, including motor vehicle parking, throughout the development. Demonstrated experience with innovative solutions for bicycling and walking, especially in constrained conditions, is a must. Familiarity with innovative design guides such as the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide and
recent bicycle/pedestrian countermeasures from FHWA is strongly encouraged. C. CONTRACT TERM AND INFORMATION The selected consultant or consultant team shall provide regional park & ride and general transportation demand management consulting services to the EOTC for a
period of twelve (12) months. Consulting teams should be led by a firm that will
perform a majority of the work and that has the managerial and technical resources capable of leading the team to assist and advise the plan partners and which will function as the primary consultant.
D. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
It is the Contractors responsibility to provide any and all safety equipment and/or managerial oversight necessary to perform all work in a safe and workman-like manner. Pitkin County reserves the right to enter the working site for periodic checks of safe working environments, as applicable.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
8
As the fiscal agent for the EOTC, Pitkin County expects that any Contractor providing goods or services will do so in compliance with Pitkin County policies,
including, but not limited to, tobacco use policies, public health orders, permitting requirements, construction ordinances, building access and safety requirements, and Pitkin County standards of conduct. Pitkin County’s elected Board of County Commissioners have identified climate
action and carbon footprint reduction as a priority for County projects. Pitkin County encourages all proposers to be environmentally conscious when preparing their proposal documents, making travel plans, printing materials, selecting fleet vehicles, designing/updating facilities systems, qualifying subcontractors, investing, and/or any other business activities wherever a less environmentally
impactful solution may or could exist. IV. SELECTION PROCESS The County is required by the terms of the Pitkin County Procurement Code to conduct a competitive selection process to select a Contractor for the above-
described proposal. This process shall be through formal proposals submitted in response to this Request for Proposals. A. SUBMITTALS 1. Proposer shall submit proposals for this Service as outlined in the Request
for Proposals and Scope of Services, or an alternately developed plan as developed by Proposer in response to and in accordance with this Request for Proposals and Information to Proposers attached hereto.
Proposal Format: Each response shall be 8½” X 11” in size. Font, Times New
Roman, size shall be no smaller than 12 point. A sample contract has been included for review and Template Contract revisions, if any, must be uploaded as a separate file with any changes clearly highlighted. Template Contract change requests will not be reviewed until scoring has been completed and, as such, any information that
could be considered material to your proposed response to the solicitation should
not be included in the sample Contract. Proposals may include pages up to 11”x17” size, as needed. a. The proposal must contain name, address, daytime phone
number(s), and e-mail address for person(s) to whom additional
selection process requests should be communicated; b. A proposed approach (basic description of how Proposer will proceed with this Service), timetable for the Service, and proposed
method of compensation for services rendered;
c. A statement of Qualifications of the Proposer and any subcontractors anticipated to perform under the awarded contract;
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
9
d. References, especially those for significantly similar projects with local governments;
e. A completed Proposal Form (may indicate “In Attached Documents” for Approach and Qualifications/References sections of the provided Proposal Form, if desired. The Proposal Form, however, will not be considered complete if any and all addenda
are not acknowledged and the form has not been signed); f. List of all subcontractors (including qualifications); g. Fee schedule of standard rates for any work that may not be
included in provided Scope of Work, as applicable 2. Proposer may be required to supply additional information upon request, or to make additional submissions under secondary selection criteria, if necessary.
3. Any and all questions or comments shall be submitted via email to procurement@pitkincounty.com no later than 4:00 PM MT on January 24, 2025. All requests must have the email subject line, “RFP 031.25 – AABC MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Request for Clarification
and Questions.” All questions, comments and answers provided shall be shared with all Proposers via addendum posted on BidNet Direct. Addendum(s) will include the requests for clarification and questions, as written by the Proposer.
4. All Proposals must be uploaded to the BidNet Direct website. Proposals will not be accepted in any other form or manner. 5. During the Request for Proposal selection process, all proposals shall
remain confidential. The entire selection process (procurement) file shall be
available to the public (which includes all Proposers) after an agreement is approved by the County, except those items for which confidentiality has been requested in writing by the Proposer, and providing that the County Attorney has reviewed and determined this to be the properly confidential
under the State Open Records Act and other relevant statutes and
regulations. B. TIME SCHEDULE
The EOTC will endeavor to use the following timetable:
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
10
January 8, 2025 Request for Proposals publicly advertised, posted on website (www.bidnetdirect.com/colorado)
January 24, 2025 Proposer’s request for clarification and questions due via email to procurement@pitkincounty.com by 4:00 PM MT January 28, 2025 County’s response to request for clarification and questions posted on BidNet Direct via addendum
February 7, 2025 PROPOSALS MUST BE UPLOADED TO BIDNET DIRECT BY 2:00 PM MT Week of
Feb. 10 -14, 2025 Meeting of Selection Committee; checking of references as necessary; requests for additional information or clarifications, if necessary; scheduling of interviews, if necessary
February 18, 2025 Issuance of Notice of Award to top-ranked proposer February 20, 2025 Notices sent to unsuccessful proposers February 24, 2025 Anticipated Contract Start Date
C. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND WEIGHING Selection of the "short-listed" Proposers to be interviewed and/or the selection of
the top-ranked Proposer will be based upon the following criteria and relative
importance (or as the same may be amended or supplemented by published secondary selection criteria, if any): 1. Approach to Project 50%
The Proposer shall prepare a brief statement as to their intention to address:
A. The Project Scope of Work B. The Project Schedule 2. List of Similar Work 20%
The Proposer shall submit examples of projects of similar size and scope,
specifically with local governments when available. 3. Estimated Cost of Services, including Reimbursable Expenses 20% A. The Proposer shall list all costs assumed necessary to successfully
complete and/or deliver the provided scope of work, services,
and/or goods, including, but not necessarily limited to: i. Labor and material expenses
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
11
ii. Reimbursable expenses for mileage and/or administrative services iii. Miscellaneous expenses
B. The Proposer shall provide a list of standard fees/rates and material markup rates to include with the Contract for any additional services or goods that may not be covered in the awarded Contract; billable only as incurred and as agreed upon in advance by mutual signing of a change order.
4. References 10% The Proposer shall provide a list, including contact name and information, of references/prior clients, especially local, state and federal government.
D. SELECTION COMMITTEE Communications between Proposer and any member of the selection committee during the selection process, except when and in the manner expressly authorized by the Request for Proposals, is prohibited. Violation of this restriction is grounds
for disqualification from the process. Voting Members of the Selection Committee: Nonvoting counsel to the Selection Committee: -Lynn Rumbaugh, Mobility Division
Manager, City of Aspen -Sam Guarino, Transportation Director, Town of Snowmass Village - Brian Pettet, Director of Public Works,
Pitkin County
-Andrew Knapp, County Engineer, Pitkin County -Linda DuPriest, Regional Transportation Director, EOTC
-County Attorney
-County Procurement
E. SAMPLE CONTRACT A sample of the Pitkin County Contract for the Provision of Services is included as Attachment A. The Proposer must present any exceptions to the standard
contract language, if any, with their proposal, included as a separate document. If
changes are not requested at the time of proposal submission, the County shall consider that terms and conditions are accepted by proposer. Requests for Contract alterations, modifications, additions, or deletions will not be entertained following proposal submission. Submittal of contract change requests is for
County’s information only and will not be reviewed until selection committee
scoring and vendor selection has been completed; contract language change requests will not disqualify any proposer or be evaluated for partiality. This opportunity is offered so proposers may familiarize themselves with standard
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
12
County terms and requirements, and change requests that are submitted at the time of proposal allow the County to expedite the consideration of such requests during the award process so as to avoid delays in contracting.
As mentioned in Section IV.A, proposers should not include any information specific to their proposed approach, pricing, delivery schedule, etc. when submitting language change requests as this information will not be reviewed prior to final selection of a top-ranked proposer. Failure of proposer to review and
abide by this guidance and any lack of conveyance of such information to the selection committee shall be construed as an error on the behalf of the proposer and not on behalf of the County or the selection committee.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
13
PROPOSAL FORM
Proposal Time: 2:00 PM MT Proposal Date: February 7, 2025 From:
Phone E-mail Address: To: THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
c/o Procurement 530 E Main Street, Suite #304 Aspen, CO 81611 For: RFP 031.25: AABC MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Pursuant to a request by the Pitkin County Commissioners, the undersigned Proposer having examined this Request for Proposals (RFP), including familiarization of the site and/or the conditions of the proposed Service environment, including the availability of materials and labor hereby proposes to furnish all labor, materials, supplies, applicable
permits, services, and supervision required to provide a completed product as detailed in this RFP and adjoining documentation for the sum of:
$___________________________________________
Fee Schedule(s) for this project and any applicable work that may not have been included in the Scope of Work but may be necessary for successful completion must be included in the proposal documents.
Approach, Qualifications, and References may be submitted on your own proposal form;
please indicate “In attached documents” for any items omitted herein. A completed proposal form including, at minimum, acknowledgement of all addenda and signature/corporate seal is required for proposals to be considered responsive.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
14
Statement and Detailed Approach to Service:
Qualifications of Proposer: Please insert names address, phone numbers and description of similar Service for
Reference Checks. 1.
2.
3.
It is further understood that the right is reserved by the County to reject any and all
proposals and it is agreed that the proposals may not be withdrawn for a period of ten (10) days from specified time for receiving proposals. The Proposer acknowledges receipt of Addenda Nos. .
The right is reserved to waive any informalities and to reject any Proposal. (Type/Print name under all signatures)
Dated this day of , 2025
(Corporate seal) PROPOSER:
SIGNATURES: If the proposal is being submitted by a Corporation, the Proposal Form should be signed by an officer, i.e. President or vice-president. The signature of the
officer signing shall be attested to by the secretary and properly sealed. If the proposal is
being submitted by an individual or a partnership, the proposal shall so indicate and be properly signed.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
15
INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS FOR PITKIN COUNTY CONTRACTS
1. a. A "Proposal" is a responsive, conforming, unconditional, complete, legible and properly executed offer on the Pitkin County Proposal Form to do the work called for
in the Request for Proposals (“RFP”). b. Proposals must be submitted electronically in PDF format and submitted at the time
and place designated in the RFP. Electronic submissions must be clearly marked as a "sealed proposal" with the Service name and the name, contact person, mailing address and telephone number of the Proposer. The County reserves the right to request verification of any original or electronic signature at any time before issuing a Notice of Award. c. It shall be the responsibility of the Proposer to ensure that the Proposal is in proper form and in the County's possession by or before the scheduled time and date of public
Proposal opening. Proposals will not be accepted after the scheduled time and date of opening. Any Proposals received late will be returned to the Proposer unopened, if possible. In the event that it is impossible to determine who the late Proposer is unless
the envelope is opened, the envelope will be opened, the address determined, and the envelope and Proposal returned immediately to the Proposer.
d. If specified in the Request for Proposals, parties who request packages of proposal documents will be required to pay a fee for the document package. All parties who request packages must provide the name of the potential Proposer, along with the
name of a contact person, address, telephone number, and email address for the purpose of dissemination of Addenda or additional proposal information.
e. If a mistake is made or discovered at or after the public opening, the County reserves the right to determine which party made the mistake and whether the mistake is material and, after these determinations, the County, in its sole discretion, shall make the decision whether to accept or reject the Proposal. No advantage shall be taken by either party of manifest clerical errors or omissions in the Proposal documents or the Request for Proposals (and plans and specifications). All Proposers are required to notify the County immediately of any errors of omissions that may be encountered. (See 2.a. and 2.c., below).
f. The signer of the Proposal must initial any alteration or erasure. If provided on the required Proposal Form, the proposal price of each item must be stated in numerals
and words; in case of a conflict, the words will control. In case of conflict between the indicated sum of any addition of figures and the correct sum, the correct sum will control.
g. No reimbursement will be made by the County for any costs incurred in the preparation of a statement of qualifications, Proposals, or attendance at a site
inspection, pre-bid conference or interviews. h. No person, firm, corporation or other entity shall be allowed to make, file or be
interested in more than one Proposal for the same work, unless alternate proposals are called for. A person, firm, corporation or other entity who has submitted a sub-proposal to Proposer, or who has quoted prices on materials to a Proposer, is not
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
16
hereby disqualified from submitting a sub-proposal or quoting prices to other Proposers.
2. a. If any person contemplating submitting a Proposal is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of the Drawings, Specifications or other Proposal or Contract Documents,
or finds discrepancies, errors, ambiguities, inconsistencies, incompleteness or omissions in the Drawings or Specifications or the proposal process, he/she must submit to the Procurement Officer a written request for an amplification, clarification,
explanation, interpretation or correction thereof. Failure to do so shall constitute: (1) acceptance by the Proposer of the Drawings, Specifications or other Proposal or Contract Documents as is, and (2) a waiver by the Proposer of any and all claims arising, or that might arise, out of such discrepancies, errors, ambiguities, inconsistencies, incompleteness or omissions. b. Proposers may propose substitute materials or techniques if such substitution is equal to or better than the materials or techniques described in the RFP and if the substitution
has been submitted in writing at least ten (10) days prior to the public Proposal opening. The burden of proof of equality or superior quality is on the Proposer. If accepted as equal by the County in its discretion, the substitute will be designated as
an alternative on a formal addendum available to all Proposers three (3) days prior to the deadline for Proposal submission, when possible. If approval of any substitute materials and/or processes has not been provided by County prior to the deadline for
proposal submission, proposers may elect to submit an alternate bid with separate pricing and rationalization for the alternate materials and/or approach. County, at its sole discretion, will determine if the alternate meets the needs of the respective project.
c. Any amplification, clarification, explanation, interpretation or correction of the documents will be made only by written Addendum duly issued and a copy of the
Addendum will be mailed or delivered to each person receiving a set of the Proposal Documents. Delivery, as used in these Instructions, shall include electronic delivery through e-mail, facsimile, web-posting or other electronic means. Neither the County nor the Procurement Officer will be responsible for any information, representations, explanations or interpretations of the Contract Documents not in written addenda. d. The County reserves the right to call a pre-proposal conference; if called and conducted, a summary of the pre-proposal conference will be mailed or electronically
delivered to all parties receiving a set of Proposal documents. e. On request, the County will provide each Proposer access to the site to conduct, at
Proposer's sole cost, such inspections, tests and investigations as each Proposer deems necessary for submission of a Proposal. No information provided by County representatives at such a site inspection shall be deemed a waiver of the requirements
of 2.a. and 2.c., above. f. Any Addenda issued during the time of the Proposal process, or forming a part of the
Proposal Documents, shall be covered in the Proposal, and shall be considered a part of the RFP. Receipt of each Addendum shall be acknowledged in the Proposal.
g. If specified in the RFP, a request for qualifications may precede the RFP process.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
17
3. a. Each Proposal, if required by the Proposal Documents, shall be accompanied by a certified check or bid bond in a form acceptable to the County Attorney, in an amount
specified, payable without condition to the County as a guarantee that the Proposer, if awarded the Contract, will promptly execute the Agreement in accordance with the Proposal, and will furnish, if required by the Proposal, good and sufficient bonds for
the faithful performance of the Contract and for the payment to all persons supplying labor and material for the work (see 10.a., below). The Proposal guaranties of all parties except the three highest scoring Proposals will be returned promptly after the opening
of Proposals. After execution of the Contract and issuance of a Notice to Proceed, the remaining two Proposers’ guaranties will be returned. b. Proposer also, if required by the Proposal Documents, will fully complete and submit with the Proposal a Pitkin County Qualification Statement, or an updated Statement if one is already on file. Pitkin County reserves the right to pre-qualify Proposers based on said qualification statements.
c. Proposer also must submit with the Proposal a list of subcontractors, independent contractors and suppliers to be employed under the Contract. If the County has a reasonable objection to any such subcontractor, independent contractor or supplier, it
shall notify the Proposer and the Proposer may then: (a) withdraw the Proposal; or (b) substitute an acceptable contractor or supplier. If required by the Contract Documents, subcontractors, independent contractors and/or suppliers may be required to submit a
Contractor's Qualification Statement. d. Proposals by corporations must be executed in the corporate name by the president or
a vice-president (or other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign) and the corporate seal must be affixed and attested by the secretary or an assistant secretary. The corporate address and state of incorporation shall be shown below the
signature. e. Proposals by partnerships or limited liability companies (“LLC”) must be executed in the partnership or LLC name and signed by a partner, authorized LLC officer, whose title must appear under the signature and the official address of the partnership or LLC must be shown below the signature. The state in which the entity was formed and whose law governs the entity shall be shown below the signature.
f. All names must be typed or printed below the signature. 4. a. Proposer acknowledges that this proposal is solicited and submitted subject to the
requirements of the "Pitkin County Procurement Code," (Ordinance #009-2021, as previously amended by Ordinances #026-2005 & #03-2007 (copies available via the website at https://pitkincounty.com/DocumentCenter/View/27059/title-03-revenue-
and-finance or upon request for a nominal charge). As such, the Proposer agrees to comply with all applicable requirements of said Procurement Code relating to proposing, contract drafting, contract administration, and ethics. The requirements of
the Procurement Code are incorporated herein by this reference. b. The Proposer shall immediately notify the County Manager in writing of any violation of said Code by the County's employees or agents, which violation is known or should have been known by Proposer, and failure to so notify the County of violations within five (5) days of knowledge of such violations shall disqualify the Proposer from award
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
18
of the Contract being proposed and shall be deemed as a waiver of any action or defense that the Proposer may have against the County by reason of such violation of
the Procurement Code. c. The submission of a Proposal shall be conclusive evidence and legal admission that
the Proposer: (1) has no questions, complaints or objections in connection with the Proposal process and/or documents, subject to any requests made by Proposer for amplification, clarification, explanation, interpretation or correction pursuant to
Paragraph 2.a. and 2.c., above; (2) has no questions, complaints or objections as to the completeness, sufficiency, scope or detail of the Proposal Documents; and (3) has full knowledge of the scope, nature, quality and quantity of work to be performed, the detailed requirements of the Proposal Documents including any and all contract documents, the plans and specifications, the site and conditions under which the work is to be performed, the Pitkin County Procurement Code and applicable Colorado law. 5. a. All Proposals will be opened and read in public by name of Proposer only. No
Proposals may be withdrawn after the beginning of the public opening. The County, in its sole discretion, may delay a Proposal opening for no longer than two (2) business days if weather or other circumstances beyond control of Proposers results in delay in
receipt of Proposals. Proposals may be withdrawn at any time prior to the beginning of the public opening or modified by a document executed and delivered in a form substantially similar to the Proposal Form prior to opening.
b. All Proposals submitted must be valid for a minimum period of sixty (60) days after the date of the Proposal opening. During this time, Proposers are investigated, and
Proposals are evaluated. 6. a. Proposals will be awarded to the highest scoring Proposer complying with the terms,
conditions, guidelines, selection criteria, plans and specifications presented in the Request For Proposals. All rights are reserved by the County to determine, in the County's sole reasonable discretion, whether the Proposal meets the needs or a purpose intended and is within the budget. b. Although price may be a major consideration in the selection of a Proposal, the County does not award on price alone. The County may also consider the quality of product as judged by the County; past experience with Proposers, subcontractors, independent
contractors, products or suppliers; qualifications of the Proposers and/or subcontractors, independent contractors or suppliers; services offered; warranties; maintenance considerations; long-range costs; delivery; and similar considerations,
all as specified in detail in the RFP. c. The County reserves the absolute right to conduct such investigations as it deems
necessary to assist in the evaluation of any Proposal and to establish the experience, responsibility, reliability, references, reputation, business ethics, history, qualifications and financial ability of the Proposers and proposed subcontractors,
independent contractors and suppliers. The purpose of such investigation is to satisfy the County that the Proposer has the experience, resources and commercial reputation necessary to perform the work and support any warranties in accordance with the
Contract Documents in the prescribed manner and time.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
19
d. The County, at its sole discretion, may require the apparent successful Proposer to demonstrate, at a place and time designated by the County, that the Proposal meets
the performance criteria specified, or to otherwise provide documented proof from independent reliable sources acceptable to the County that said performance criteria will be met prior to final acceptance of the Proposal. The burden of proof of such a
demonstration is on the Proposer. In the event that the apparent successful Proposer fails to demonstrate or provide acceptable proof of meeting required performance criteria, that proposal will be rejected and the next eligible Proposer in the selection
ranking will be invited to participate in the same process until a proposal meeting performance criteria is found within the ranking of eligible Proposers. The County reserves the rights to reject any or all Proposals or to otherwise accept the Proposal which in the County's sole discretion is in the best interest of the County. e. Pitkin County reserves the right, if it deems such action to be in the best interests of the County, to reject any and all Proposals or to waive any irregularities or informalities therein. Any incomplete, conclusory, false or misleading information
provided by Proposer shall be grounds for rejection of the proposal. If proposals are rejected, the County further reserves the right to investigate and accept the next best proposal in order of ranking or to reject all proposals and re-solicit for additional pro-
posals. f. Any questions or disputes involving the documents or procedures not covered by these
Instructions or other Proposal Documents shall be resolved by the Procurement Officer on the basis of fairness, custom in the industry, maximization of competition and best interests and convenience of the County.
7. Issuance of Notice of Award, execution of Contract Documents and issuance of a Notice to Proceed shall be as specified in the Contract Documents and in accordance with the Pitkin
County Procurement Code. County standard practice is to first notice the top-ranked proposer and enter into a final contract agreement prior to notifying unsuccessful bidders. Non-awarded bidders will be notified of the County’s decision and shall be offered an optional debrief conversation of the bidding and evaluation process; debrief conversations may be offered prior to contract signing but, in most cases, will not be scheduled until a contract has been finalized. 8. Contracts will be executed on standard Pitkin County Contract documents and/or by separate
agreement with the Proposer. Copies of any applicable standard forms are included with the Proposal Documents. The County reserves the right to negotiate with the Proposer for contract terms not specified in the Proposing Documents. Any changes from the Pitkin
County standard form contract may result in a delay in the issuance of a Notice to Proceed in order to obtain any necessary County Attorney review of changes from the standard form. Proposer agrees that any such delays shall not be grounds for either additional compensation
or an extension of time to complete the work that is the subject of the Proposal. 9. If any contract awarded as a result of a Proposal extends beyond the calendar year, nothing
herein shall be construed as an obligation by the County beyond any amounts that may be, from time to time, appropriated by the County on an annual basis. It is understood that payment under any Contract is conditional upon annual or supplemental statutory
appropriation of funds by said governing body and that before providing services, the Proposer, if he/she so requests, will be advised as to the status of funds appropriated for
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
20
services or materials and shall not be obligated to provide services or materials for which funds have not been appropriated.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
Rev. 2022.6.21 CDD
RFP # 031.25
ADDENDUM # 1
Date: January 30, 2025
TO: All Parties of Interest for the Aspen Airport Business Center Multimodal Transportation
Plan.
This addendum is issued in response to inquiries received and/or to clarify details regarding
the Aspen Airport Business Center Multimodal Transportation Plan Request for Proposals.
The following responses and/or clarifications are hereby adopted as Project Documents and, where applicable, supersede or are in addition to any previously issued documentation or communication.
1. Question: Will there be opportunities to engage with residents or representatives of residents regarding the future Lumberyard affordable housing development?
• Response: There will not be an opportunity to engage with residents of the
Lumberyard as the project is still several years away from completion. City
of Aspen representatives working on the Lumberyard project will be important stakeholders in this planning project. 2. Question: Secondly, does Pitkin County have a preferred online platform for
conducting digital surveys and facilitating public engagement?
• Response: Pitkin County utilizes a number of tools for communication. Refer to the Community Relations page of the County’s website, here: https://pitkincounty.com/375/Community-Relations.
3. Question: Given recent discussions regarding potential shifts in federal infrastructure funding programs, are there any anticipated impacts on this project's funding or timeline that we should be aware of?
• Response: No. This project is funded through the Pitkin County Transit
Sales & Use tax and therefore is not subject to federal funding conditions or timelines.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
Rev. 2022.6.21 CDD
Thank you for reviewing this Request for Proposals and for your willingness to pursue business opportunities with Pitkin County. Should you require any additional clarification
regarding the Project or this Addendum, please contact Procurement@PitkinCounty.com .
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment A - RFP Documents
Pitkin County, CO
Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC)
Multimodal Transportation Plan
February 7, 2025
Prepared By Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
In Association With
SGM
Manifest Communication
Matthew Kaufman, AICP
Principal-in-Charge
(720) 409-0689
matthewkaufman@altago.com
1543 Champa Street, Suite 201
Denver, CO 80202
Sealed Proposal
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 2
The Pitkin County Board of Commissionersc/o Procurement530 E Main Street, Suite #304Aspen, CO 81611
Re: RFP 031.25: AABC Multimodal Transportation Plan
Dear Members of the Selection Committee:
On behalf of Alta Planning + Design Inc. (Alta), I am pleased to submit our proposal to lead the Aspen
Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan. Our team, in collaboration with our
partners, brings unparalleled expertise, deep local knowledge, and a commitment to innovative and
practical transportation solutions that will enhance mobility, safety, and connectivity within the AABC.
We are proud to once again partner with SGM, a firm that has worked with Pitkin County for 35 years,
including serving as the County’s On-Call Engineer since 2012. SGM’s extensive experience will
be instrumental in addressing parking, traffic, and delivery logistics within the project. Additionally,
our collaboration with Manifest Communication will deliver effective community and stakeholder
engagement, leveraging their deep-rooted connections with local stakeholders and understanding of
current nearby projects to foster an inclusive planning process.
A successful multimodal transportation plan must be guided by intentional engagement, a
comprehensive evaluation of alternatives, a compelling vision backed by the community, and a clear
roadmap for implementation.
The Alta team is uniquely qualified to deliver on these objectives due to the following key
strengths:
• Subject Matter Expertise: Alta is a nationally recognized leader in Complete Streets and active
transportation planning and design. We supported NACTO in developing the recently published
Urban Bikeway Design Guide (Third Edition) and specialize in creating accessible, sustainable, and
innovative transportation solutions.
• Deep Understanding of the Community: Our extensive experience in the Roaring Fork Valley
includes multimodal planning and design efforts for the City of Aspen, Glenwood Springs, RFTA,
and the Towns of Carbondale and Basalt. Manifest Communication further strengthens our team
with their local knowledge and engagement expertise. Additionally, Alta’s Lead Engineer Chloe
Ward resides in the Roaring Fork Valley and will bring another local perspective and a personal
understanding of the region’s needs to our work on the project.
• Innovative and Implementation-Focused Approach: We prioritize practical, actionable strategies
that balance visionary planning with realistic design parameters. Alta’s multimodal best practice
expertise will be blended with SGM’s deep understanding of Pitkin County infrastructure and
CDOT design guidelines, leading to recommendations that are both forward-thinking and feasible.
February 7, 2025
Requirement A
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 3
Furthermore, our team is already well-versed in the local transportation landscape, having recently
reviewed the Lumberyard project construction plans. This familiarity equips us to develop tailored,
effective solutions for the AABC’s unique transportation challenges and opportunities.
We are excited about the prospect of working with the Elected Officials Transportation Committee
(EOTC) and community stakeholders to create a transformative transportation plan that aligns with the
region’s goals. Please feel free to reach out to us, at the contact information below, with any questions or
additional selection process requests. We welcome the opportunity to discuss our strategy and approach
further.
Thank you for your time and consideration. We look forward to the possibility of collaborating to
enhance connectivity and mobility within the AABC.
Sincerely,
Requirement A
Matthew Kaufman, AICP
Principal-in-Charge
(720) 409-0689
matthewkaufman@altago.com
1543 Champa Street, Suite 201
Denver, CO 80202
Jonny Rotheram, RSP1
Project Manager
(720) 409-0689
jonnyrotheram@altago.com
1543 Champa Street, Suite 201
Denver, CO 80202
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 4
addressing the current gaps in pedestrian and
bicyclist infrastructure, we aim to enhance safety
and promote a shift from motor vehicle use to
more sustainable modes of transportation, thereby
supporting the County's climate action goals
and efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Furthermore, our plan will work toward equitable
access to transportation options, fostering job access
and community integration, particularly with the new
Lumberyard housing development.
In late 2024, Alta staff were asked to review draft
construction plans for the Lumberyard project,
with a lens focused on bicycle, pedestrian, and
transit safety and best practices. We are familiar
with the improvements being constructed within
the Lumberyard development, including raised
intersections and narrow streets for traffic calming,
trail connections and underpasses, and pavement
markings to highlight the presence of bicyclists.
However, from this review, we are also aware that
these improvements end at the western extents of the
Lumberyard project, leaving cyclists and pedestrians
with gaps in facilities. The AABC Multimodal
Transportation Plan will identify opportunities to
extend and expand these improvements for a seamless
connection between the AABC, Lumberyard, the
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport, Buttermilk, RFTA bus
service, and other multimodal facilities within the
Aspen and the County.
Requirement B
Project Understanding
The Elected Officials Transportation Committee
(EOTC), comprising the Pitkin County Board of
County Commissioners, the Aspen City Council,
and the Snowmass Village Town Council, is leading
efforts to develop a comprehensive multimodal
transportation plan for the Aspen Airport Business
Center (AABC). This plan will address current
and future transportation needs through proposed
infrastructure solutions and associated cost estimates.
The AABC, situated three miles west of downtown
Aspen, has evolved into a mixed-use community
with over 300 businesses, residential units,
and key services. Historically, motor vehicle
infrastructure has been prioritized in this area, but
new developments, including Aspen’s new 300-
unit Lumberyard project, require a more integrated,
multimodal approach.
The Lumberyard project will significantly impact
traffic patterns, increasing the need for safe,
accessible routes that connect residents to jobs,
schools, recreation, and transit services. Without
strategic improvements, gaps in pedestrian and
bicycle infrastructure could hinder mobility and
safety.
This project is a critical initiative aligning the
County's commitment to safety, environmental
stewardship, and community connectivity. By
Multimodal
Analysis
Implementation Focused
Planning and design to
create results-oriented
projects, ready for
funding
Engagement
Proven consensus-
building expertise and a firm commitment to
inclusive and meaningful engagement
Holistic Planning
Conducting a thorough
planning process focused on reducing drive-alone
trips and increasing walking and biking trips,
with a focus on equitable outcomes
A comprehensive analytics approach that assesses
bicycle and pedestrian linkages to transit, activity
centers, and recreation
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 5
Task 1.3 Communication with the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
Our team will facilitate regular TAC meetings at
specific project milestones during the project. We
are assuming up to four TAC meetings during the
project. The meetings will be used to introduce
the project, present findings, and solicit feedback
on all key interim deliverables; and present
recommendations from the final plan to secure buy-in
and implementation.
The TAC will include representatives from Pitkin
County Road and Bridge, Pitkin County Engineering,
the City of Aspen, the Town of Snowmass Village,
CDOT, RFTA, AABC property owners and tenants,
AABC residents, Aspen Fire, Colorado Mountain
College, and other stakeholders as identified. Our
team has established relationships with many
TAC members and brings valuable experience
collaborating with the applicable agencies and
individuals. Our familiarity with local stakeholders
will simplify TAC recruitment and see that meetings
run smoothly and all voices are heard.
Scope of Work
TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Our team will implement a comprehensive project
management plan to ensure the successful delivery
of the AABC Multimodal Transportation Plan.
This plan will provide a structured framework
for organizing tasks, coordinating stakeholders,
and managing resources efficiently. It will outline
key processes for monitoring progress, mitigating
risks, and ensuring project objectives are met on
time and within budget. The project management
plan will cover the key themes of communication,
administration, and deliverables.
Our schedule will target completion in approximately
11 months after notice to proceed.
Task 1.1 Project Management and Administration
Alta will provide monthly invoices and progress
reports in a format agreed upon at the project Kick-
Off Meeting. Project progress reports will provide
important information to the project manager on
scope, schedule, and budget to keep decision-makers
informed of progress. A schedule will be maintained,
and any updates provided at PMT meetings.
Task 1.2 Project Team Communication
At the beginning of the project, we will hold a kick-
off meeting to establish roles and responsibilities,
identify available data sources, and refine the project
schedule. This meeting will set the project up for
clear communication and alignment from the outset.
We will maintain regular contact with the EOTC
project manager and the Regional Transportation
Director to provide updates, address concerns,
and see to alignment with project goals. Alta will
conduct up to 20 bi-weekly coordination video
conference calls to discuss ongoing project progress,
any outstanding data or other project needs,
administrative items related to the project, and the
project schedule. A shared document will track
meeting agendas and action items.
Requirement B
The Alta team is uniquely qualified to facilitate broad-based
technical advisory groups that represent a wide range of interests in the community.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 6
2.1 Plan and Policy Review
After the project kick-off, the Alta team will
collaborate with the County to develop a list of plans
for review. We will focus on documents that identify
policies, recommendations, and projects that may
influence the AABC Transportation Plan. Anticipated
documents include:
• EOTC 2020 Strategic Plan
• Comprehensive Valley Transportation Plan
• 2022 AABC Traffic Impact Study
• Aspen Airport Multimodal Plan
• Pitkin County Open Space and Trails Brush Creek
to AABC Project
• West of Maroon Plan
• Recent transportation and transit studies from
Aspen, Snowmass Village, Pitkin County, and
EOTC
• Lumberyard residential development infrastructure
plans
Results from our review will be summarized in a
Plan and Policy Summary Review that will be used
to help guide the development of the multimodal
facilities network development and recommendations
in later phases of the planning process.
2.2 Data Collection and Geospatial Analysis
Our team will collect existing data relevant to
the planning process. A Data Request Memo will
be issued to the guide the collection of GIS files,
and other data required for analysis and base map
development. Each specific data request will be
annotated with its purpose and its criticality to
developing the plan recommendations.
Where critical data is unavailable, proxy data or
alternative methods may be employed, such as use of
OnTheMap (based on census data) or data available
statewide via CDOT (such as the statewide crash
database).
Existing data will be compiled in GIS to provide a
base for further analysis as specified in Task 2.3.
PROJECT MILESTONES
Technical Memoranda: Our team will prepare
and deliver three technical memoranda at key
project milestones, specifically following Task 2,
Task 3, and a combined Task 4 & Task 5. These
memoranda will document findings, analysis, and
recommendations to guide project development.
Draft and Final AABC Multimodal
Transportation Plan: Our team will develop
a comprehensive Draft and Final plan,
incorporating stakeholder input, technical
findings, and strategic recommendations to create
a cohesive, actionable roadmap for multimodal
transportation improvements at the AABC.
EOTC Presentations: We will present both
the Draft and Final AABC Multimodal
Transportation Plan at two EOTC meetings.
These presentations may be conducted virtually
to accommodate scheduling and accessibility
needs.
Task 1 Deliverables
• Project Management Plan
• Shared Project Schedule
• One kick-off meeting
• Up to 20 biweekly progress calls
• Up to four TAC meetings
• Monthly invoices and progress reports (assume 12)
TASK 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS
ANALYSIS
A thorough understanding of existing conditions
forms the foundation for developing a practical and
actionable multimodal transportation plan. The Alta
team’s ongoing work in the Roaring Fork Valley
provides a strategic advantage in accessing and
supplementing relevant data. By consolidating existing
datasets and conducting targeted field reviews, this
task aims to create a robust repository of information
that will guide the planning process and inform data-
driven recommendations.
Requirement B
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 7
Recommendations will be supported with visual aids
such as maps and data summaries for clarity and
actionable insights.
Upon collection and mapping of data from Task
2.2 and Task 2.3, our team will review whether
additional information may be required to support the
development of a multimodal facilities network and
recommendations.
Additional metrics may include:
• Sidewalk and crosswalk dimensions
• Bike lane widths and surface conditions
• Intersection sight distances
• Traffic signal timing and pedestrian crossing
intervals
• Parking turnover rates
• Transit stop amenities and patterns
2.3 Data Analysis
Our team will undertake an in-depth data analysis of
mobility within the AABC. We have partnered with
local firm SGM, who offers a wealth of knowledge
of the Roaring Folk Valley from their more than 35
years of work active in Pitkin County. Their unique
positioning and relationships with Pitkin County staff
provide a knowledge of the data available and what
data will need to be collected.
SGM will provide technical support to Alta by
leveraging their experience in traffic and parking
studies to assess current utilization patterns and
operational challenges. For parking utilization, SGM
will conduct site observations and analyze existing
conditions to identify areas of over utilization, illegal
parking hotspots, and snow removal conflicts. SGM
will also review and incorporate findings from the
2022 AABC Traffic Impact Study regarding motor
vehicle volumes, supplementing the analysis with
additional data collection if gaps are identified. To
evaluate delivery truck operations, SGM will map
staging and loading areas, assess the impact on public
rights-of-way, and identify potential inefficiencies
affecting local businesses and residents.
The Alta team will collaborate with RFTA to collect
any available data on boarding and alighting, BRT
services, and skier buses. Our team has worked
closely with RFTA over the past few years on various
initiatives and has a good working relationship with
RFTA staff. This data will provide us with a strong
basis to evaluate mobility to and from transit services
within the AABC.
Finally, the Alta team will gather origin-destination
data and usage statistics from WE-Cycle operations.
This data will allow us to understand where active
transportation users are going to and from. This
data will be important to establish whether access to
and between WE-Cycle stations could be improved
within the AABC.
Requirement B
Alta analyzes a range of data to help communities visualize and
understand what the current environment is like for bicyclists
and pedestrians and where improvements can make the largest
impact.
Walkshed
Bikeshed
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 8
2. Bicycle Network
• Evaluate connectivity of existing bike lanes and
multi-use trails
• Identify missing links and potential new
connections
• Assess bike share operations (WE-Cycle) and
demand patterns to highlight any additional
mobility needs
3. Transit Accessibility
• Examine proximity and accessibility of transit stops
to residential and commercial areas
• Identify barriers to transit use and potential
improvements
4. Parking and Delivery Staging
• Assess areas of over utilization leading to conflicts
• Evaluate loading zones and their impact on traffic
flow and active transportation safety or comfort
5. Motor Vehicle Operations
• Review vehicle traffic flow, congestion points, and
access issues
• Identify locations where excessive speeding or other
driver behaviors may be contributing to an unsafe
multimodal environment
2.6 Draft and Final Existing Conditions Report
The Draft and Final Existing Conditions Report will
synthesize findings from the Plan and Policy Review,
Data Collection and Geospatial Analysis, Bicycling
and Walking Safety Audits, and the Multimodal Gap
Analysis. This report will establish a foundational
understanding of transportation conditions within
the Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) and will
serve as the basis for future recommendations.
The Alta team will deliver a Draft Existing
Conditions Report, after which the Pitkin County
team will review, circulate internally, and provide
one set of consolidated comments, which Alta
will address before delivering the Final Existing
Conditions Report.
The result of Task 2.3 will include a series of maps
to highlight conditions for each of the analysis
areas (traffic, parking, transit access and active
transportation). The results will be incorporated into
the Existing Conditions Report.
2.4 Bicycling and Walking Safety Audits
The Alta team will conduct up to three Bicycling
and Walking Safety Audits (BWSA) to assess
infrastructure challenges and opportunities on the
ground.
1. Project Management Team Audit: This initial
BWSA will identify key areas for further review.
2. Agency Representative Audit: Focuses on
locations requiring CDOT, RFTA or other agency
input.
3. Community Member Audit: Engages residents,
particularly those with mobility challenges, to provide
insights on infrastructure gaps and accessibility
barriers.
Each audit will follow a standardized site assessment
form, supplemented by crash data and multimedia
documentation (photos/videos). The findings will
be compiled into a draft memo, reviewed by Pitkin
County staff, and finalized into a comprehensive
BWSA Memo.
2.5 Multimodal Gap Analysis
The Alta team will conduct a thorough multimodal
gap analysis to identify connectivity and access
challenges across the AABC. Using data from
Tasks 2.1 through 2.4 and any applicable public or
stakeholder engagement, the analysis will focus on
five key areas:
1. Pedestrian Infrastructure
• Identify gaps in sidewalks, crosswalks, and
pedestrian signalization (e.g., those at the accesses
to SH 82)
• Assess pedestrian crossings at key intersections
within the AABC network, including crossing
widths and documentation of any crossing facilities
Requirement B
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 9
Target Audiences
A detailed stakeholder analysis will be
conducted at project initiation. Preliminary
audiences include:
• AABC business owners, employees, and
customers
• Property owners and residents (renters)
• Key organizations (CMC, RFTA, airport
management)
• Local Media
• EOTC and its representative organizations
• Project Technical Advisory Committee
• General public
Task 3.1 Development of Engagement Plan
Stakeholder and public outreach will play a critical
role in understanding transportation and safety
challenges at the AABC and in building consensus
for potential solutions. We propose a comprehensive
and inclusive engagement strategy, developed in
close collaboration with the TAC and project team,
to see that all relevant perspectives are heard and
considered. We will use outreach databases (e.g., the
Lumberyard project and Brush Creek-AABC trail
reports) to engage relevant audiences effectively.
Outreach for planning projects is conducted in two
distinct phases. The first phase focuses on gathering
valuable input from stakeholders regarding current
travel patterns, experiences, challenges, and ideas
for improvements. The second phase shifts toward
collaboration, inviting constituents to propose,
evaluate, and provide feedback on recommendations.
We will work with the TAC to develop an
Engagement Plan that identifies key stakeholders, the
tactics that will be used to engage stakeholders, the
timing of tactics, desired outcomes and inputs from
engagement efforts, and tools for tracking success.
Task 2 Deliverables
• Data Request Memo
• Field Review Data Collection Plan
• Draft and Final Bike and Walk Safety Audit Memo
• Draft and Final Existing Conditions Report,
including:
»Plan and Policy Summary Review
»Existing Conditions Maps
»Bike and Walk Safety Audit Memo
»Multimodal Gap Analysis
TASK 3. STAKEHOLDER AND
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Effective stakeholder and public engagement are
essential to developing a transportation plan that
reflects the needs and aspirations of the AABC
community. We have partnered with Manifest
Communication to provide engagement support
throughout this project, bringing an in-depth
knowledge of the community. By incorporating
diverse perspectives, this outreach process will
uncover critical insights into transportation and
safety challenges while fostering buy-in for proposed
solutions. Manifest Communication will implement
a comprehensive and inclusive engagement strategy,
seeing that all voices are heard and considered
throughout the planning process.
This task is designed to build trust and collaboration
among stakeholders and the public through two
distinct outreach phases. The first phase emphasizes
understanding existing conditions, gathering
input on current usage patterns, challenges, and
opportunities. The second phase focuses on
presenting proposed solutions and seeking feedback
to refine recommendations. Guided by the TAC, the
outreach strategy will be customized to address the
unique dynamics of the AABC and its multimodal
transportation goals.
Requirement B
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 10
Task 3.4 Community Event
Due to the small geographic area of core
stakeholders, we propose holding an event hosted at
Steeps in the AABC to reach residents and businesses
(owners/employees). Our team will provide Spanish
translation for materials where required.
The specific tactics of the Engagement Plan will be
developed in coordination with TAC.
Task 3 Deliverables
• Public and Stakeholder Engagement Plan
• Stakeholder Interviews (assume up to six)
• Small Group Meetings (assume up to six)
• Pop-Up Events (assume two)
• Outreach summaries
TASK 4. PROPOSED MULTIMODAL
FACILITIES NETWORK
Building on the findings from data collection in Task
2 and public input from Task 3, the Alta team will
outline critical infrastructure needs for the AABC
network, applying a Complete Streets approach.
With expertise informed by Alta’s collaboration with
NACTO on the latest Urban Bikeway Design Guide
(Third Edition), our team brings intimate knowledge
of state-of-the-art bike facility designs to this effort.
Task 4.1 Comprehensive Plan of Proposed
Multimodal Facilities
Alta follows a structured, data-driven approach to
identify and prioritize multimodal infrastructure
improvements. Using stakeholder input, findings from
the BWSAs, and the gap analysis, the Alta team will
identify infrastructure improvements that:
• Close network gaps by extending sidewalks,
shared-use paths, and bicycle facilities
• Improve safety at key conflict points through
traffic calming, enhanced crossings, and protected
bike lanes
• Enhance connectivity between residential areas,
businesses, transit stops, and employment hubs
The Engagement Plan will be tailored to effectively
addresses the unique needs and goals of the AABC
Multimodal Transportation Plan. Some of the
stakeholders we will target and the tactics we will
consider using are discussed below.
Task 3.2 Stakeholder Interviews and Small Group
Meetings
Our team will facilitate one-on-one and small-group
discussions with key stakeholders, including RFTA,
CMC, airport management, Pitkin County Public
Works, and other influential individual voices like
Gary Tennenbaum (Pitkin County OST Director,
Brush Creek to AABC trail project), Michael Miracle
(Aspen One, Director of Community Engagement),
plus John Bennett or George Newman who have
been involved in valley transportation for decades.
These qualitative engagements will uncover detailed
insights and foster collaboration.
Task 3.3 Pop-Up Events
We will organize outreach at high-traffic areas,
such as RFTA stops and Roxy’s Market, to capture
on-the-go feedback from AABC users. The idea of
“meeting people where they are” instead of relying
heavily on destination events has proven to be
successful in our tenure of outreach.
Requirement B
Alta excels at community outreach and engagement at public events. We create easy-to-understand project materials, and use them to help generate positive public support for our plans and projects.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 11
Task 4.3 Cost Estimates
The plan will include planning-level cost estimates
for the highest-priority recommendations. These costs
will be used to guide financial planning, decision-
making, and implementation strategies.
Task 4 Deliverables
• Proposed Multimodal Facilities Network Technical
Memorandum
TASK 5. DRAFT AND FINAL
REPORTS
The final phase of the project will focus on
synthesizing all findings and recommendations into a
comprehensive draft report for review by the EOTC
and stakeholders. Feedback from these reviews
will be incorporated so the final report reflects the
community's vision and priorities.
Alta is committed to producing reports that are both
impactful and actionable. Our team will build on
the momentum generated throughout the project to
engage decision-makers and define clear roles and
responsibilities for TAC members and other project
champions in driving implementation.
The finalized report will be presented to the
EOTC, offering a structured roadmap for future
transportation improvements. Key deliverables for
this phase include the Draft Report and the Final
Report.
Task 5 Deliverables
• Task 5.1 Draft AABC Multimodal Transportation
Plan
• Task 5.2 Final AABC Multimodal Transportation
Plan
Please see our fee schedule on page 30 for our
proposed method of compensation.
Alta will work with Pitkin County to develop a modal
hierarchy framework to guide decision-making, see
that recommendations are responsive to community
needs, and support the project’s goals:
• Enhance Safety: Address hazardous pedestrian
crossing situations and improve overall safety for
bicyclists and pedestrians
• Encourage Mode Shift: Promote a shift from
motor vehicle use to transit, bicycling, and walking
to reduce traffic congestion and environmental
impact
• Improve Connectivity: Create a cohesive and
connected transportation network that serves all
current and future uses of the AABC
• Create a balanced transportation network that
serves all modes equitably
For state-of-the-art design and accessibility, the
plan will incorporate best practices in applying
safety countermeasures from updated NACTO and
AASHTO guidelines. We will also reference Public
Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)
for accessibility for individuals with mobility
challenges.
Alta’s partners at SGM will develop data-driven
parking and traffic circulation recommendations
to address existing challenges and optimize future
operations.
Task 4.2 Prioritization Matrix and
Implementation
Each recommendation within the proposed
multimodal facilities network will be categorized
in a prioritization matrix by type (e.g., crossings,
active transportation, and parking). The matrix will
include implementation goals, associated impacts,
benefits, and challenges, along with feasibility
and value assessments for each recommendation.
Additionally, a funding plan will outline potential
grants, partnerships, and capital improvement project
funding sources to support implementation efforts.
Requirement B
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 12
Requirement B
Timetable
TTaasskk 11 PPrroojjeecctt MMaannaaggeemmeenntt
1.1 Project Management and Administration
1.2 Project Team Communication
1.3 Communication with the TAC
TTaasskk 22 EExxiissttiinngg CCoonnddiittiioonnss AAnnaallyyssiiss
2.1 Plan and Policy Review
2.2 Data Collection and Geospacial Analysis
2.3 Data Analysis
2.4 Bicycling and Walking Safety Audits (BWSA)
2.5 Multimodal Gap Analysis
2.6 Draft and Final Existing Conditions Report
TTaasskk 33 SSttaakkeehhoollddeerr aanndd PPuubblliicc OOuuttrreeaacchh
3.1 Development of Engagement Plan
3.2 Stakeholder Interviews and Small Group
Meetings & Associated Materials
3.3 Public Pop-up Events & Associated Materials
3.4 Community Event
TTaasskk 44 PPrrooppoosseedd MMuullttiimmooddaall FFaacciilliittiieess NNeettwwoorrkk
4.1 Comprehensive Plan of Proposed
Multimodal Facilities
4.2 Prioritization Matrix and Implementation
4.3 Cost E stimates
TTaasskk 55..00 DDrraafftt aanndd FFiinnaall RReeppoorrttss
5.1 Draft R eport
5.2 Final Report
AAPPRRMMAARR NNOOVV DDEECC JJAANN FFEEBB
22002255 22002266
JJUULL AAUUGG SSEEPP OOCCTTMMAAYYJJUUNN
This proposed schedule reflects the scope outlined in this proposal. The Alta team is
flexible in our approach and looks forward to working with the County to finalize the
scope and schedule to meet the needs of the County and project.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 13
To help our clients realize plan recommendations,
we identify traditional and innovative funding
strategies, prepare land development code language
to leverage improvements through new development,
and establish implementation plans to clearly map
the most strategic locations for communities to make
their initial investments.
BUSINESS DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT
Alta has a unique practice that is centered on
Complete Streets and bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Because of this specialization, we have the expertise
needed to resolve transportation, urban design,
and land-use issues to create connected, vibrant,
and livable communities. We excel in planning and
designing solutions that result in economic growth for
business districts and create environmental, social,
and health benefits for the community. Our staff
have specialized expertise in areas such as land-use
planning, traffic calming, context-sensitive design,
Complete Streets, Main Streets, transit corridors and
access, multimodal design, and urban design that
will result in a holistic vision and effective business
district plans.
Statement of Qualifications
Alta is a sustainable
transportation consulting
firm dedicated to creating
active, healthy communities through planning,
landscape architecture, engineering, and education/
encouragement programs.
Our work brings about positive change by creating
places that are geared towards moving people rather
than cars, connecting community members to daily
needs, and empowering every person to live an
active, healthy life.
Alta was founded in 1996, when cities and
communities were calling for safer streets for people
walking and bicycling. We pioneered the field of
active transportation and evolved into a visionary
multimodal practice. As a global leader in mobility
innovation, we are dedicated to working across
disciplines to address social justice, safety, and
environmental resilience.
MULTIMODAL PLANNING
Alta works with communities to provide
opportunities for people to choose bicycling and
walking for recreation and transportation. We have
developed plans for over 500 jurisdictions throughout
the United States. Our planning process includes
extensive field work on bicycle and on foot, engaging
residents and stakeholders through group rides,
audits, and engagement activities, and documenting
existing conditions and identifying needs through
easily readable maps, photographs, and narrative
discussion.
We use this baseline information to prepare short-
and long-term project and program recommendations
based on quickly evolving industry and design best
practices. We integrate our engineering expertise into
our planning recommendations, concepts, and cost
estimates to see that projects can move seamlessly
into design and construction.
Requirement C
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 14
Alta internal white papers
• Bicycle Detection: A review of available
technologies and practical experience to aid in the
creation of smarter intersections that work for all
users
• Next Generation Trails: New Mobility Trends in
Shared‐Use Trail Design and Management
• Quick Build Guide: How to Build Safer Streets
Quick and Affordably
• Corner Design for All Users
• Active Transportation Safety and Autonomous
Vehicles
• Advisory Bike Lanes in North America
• Lessons Learned: Evolution of the Protected
Intersection
• Best Practices in Campus Bicycle Planning and
Program Development
• Bike Corrals: Local Business Impacts, Benefits, and
Attitudes
• Fundamentals of Bicycle Boulevard Planning &
Design
• Bike Sharing/Public Bikes: A Summary of
Programs, Vendors and Technologies
Alta has led critical national research on
transportation policy, including recent guidebooks for
the Federal Highway Administration on policies that
support safe and complete multimodal networks and
performance measures to better evaluate multimodal
transportation system connectivity. The industry best
management practices Alta has generated in the field
of active transportation include:
National Association of City Transportation
Officials (NACTO):
• Urban Bikeway Design Guide
• Designing for Small Things with Wheels Working
Paper
• Don’t Give up at the Intersection
• Shared Micromobility Permitting, Process, and
Participation Working Paper
US Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
• Guidebook for Measuring Multimodal Connectivity
• Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks
• Bike Network Mapping Idea Book
• Strategic Agenda for Pedestrian and Bicycle
Transportation
• Noteworthy Local Policies That Support Safe and
Complete Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks
Requirement C
Alta regularly develops user-friendly local and national guidelines for the implementation of multimodal facilities in both urban and rural contexts. The excerpt pictured is from the FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks Guide.
NATIONAL BEST PRACTICES AND GUIDANCE
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 15
PITKIN COUNTY
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MATTHEW KAUFMAN
Principal-in-Charge
JONNY ROTHERAM
Project Manager
AMY JOHNSON
Assistant Project Manager/
Planning Lead
PLANNING & ENGAGEMENT
BRANDON GONZALEZ
Active Transportation Advisor
ENGINEERING
BRYAN LEYBA
Planner
RACHEL BRENNEMAN
Community Engagement Specialist
CHLOE WARD
Lead Engineer
ASHLEY CLINE
Transportation Engineer
DAN COKLEY
Transportation/Traffic Engineer
ERIC MAHONEY
Engineer
SOOZY ZERBE
Engineer
Organizational Chart
The Alta team will manage this project through a collaborative process that provides local resources connected
to a national network of skills for specific project tasks. Alta will serve as the prime consultant for this project.
Our team also includes subconsultants, SGM, who will provide traffic engineering services, and Manifest
Communications, who will serve as the local engagement specialist. Subconsultant qualifications are included
on page 29.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 16
Requirement C
Key Staff
To meet the expectations of the project and deliver a
superior product to Pitkin County, we have assembled
a team of capable and experienced professionals.
As passionate professionals who specialize in
multimodal transportation, the Alta team has a
proven ability to collaborate to resolve complex
issues with inspired design solutions. Staff resumes
with project experience are included in the appendix
starting on page 33.
Matthew Kaufman, AICP | Principal-in-Charge
Matthew is Alta’s leader of TDM
Planning and has 21 years of
experience developing
transportation plans and programs
that reduce vehicle trips, improve
public health, and support smart
land use. Based in Denver, his project portfolio spans
the country and includes the creation of numerous
TDM plans for redevelopment sites, shopping centers,
urban corridors, office developments, and
municipalities. As Principal-in-Charge, Matthew will
provide overall project guidance and quality
assurance.
Jonny Rotheram, RSP1 | Project Manager
Jonny has over 17 years of
experience in transportation
planning, community outreach and
influencing travel behavior change.
Jonny specializes in multimodal
planning, managing projects from
initial data collection through to prioritization of
specific improvements and plan adoption. His
experience also includes developing TDM programs
to complement infrastructure improvements with an
eye on equity impacts. As Project Manager, Jonny
will be responsible for communications, task
assignments, project budgeting, and coordination.
Amy Johnson, AICP | Assistant Project Manager/
Planning Lead
Amy is a Principal Transportation
Planner with 16 years of experience
in both the public and private
sectors. Based in Denver, she has
led and supported TDM planning
efforts at the state, regional, and local efforts. Amy’s
work is data-driven. She has a unique ability to
collect, analyze, and organize data that provides clear
insights and yields informed planning decisions. Amy
will work with Jonny on project management tasks
and serve as the Planning Lead.
Brandon Gonzalez, AICP | Active Transportation
Advisor
Brandon is a Principal and
Southwest/Mountain Region Leader
at Alta. He is an experienced
transportation planner and
multidisciplinary Project Manager.
Brandon’s core competencies include transportation
planning, corridor planning and design, trail planning
and design, Complete Streets, and vulnerable road
user safety. He offers deep experience facilitating
advisory groups and elected bodies, building
consensus, and leading successful public engagement
and visioning exercises. Brandon has worked in both
the public and private sectors and he understands the
challenges and opportunities associated with active
transportation planning. Brandon will serve as a
senior advisor providing overall project support.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 17
Requirement C
Chloe Ward, PE | Lead Engineer
Chloe joined Alta after discovering
that her passion or active
transportation could be translated
into her career as an engineer. With
10 years of transportation
engineering experience, Chloe is an
expert in bicycle and pedestrian design ranging from
small mountain towns to dense urban areas. She
works on a range of projects, including on-street
bicycle and pedestrian facilities, multiuse pathways
and trails, and design guidelines. Based in Glenwood
Springs, Chloe has enjoyed working on numerous
projects across the Roaring Fork Valley that include
planning, safety, conceptual, and full design projects.
Ashley Cline, PE | Transportation Engineer
As a seasoned Project Manager and
Lead Transportation Engineer at
SGM, Ashley coordinates across
disciplines to ensure effective,
cohesive pedestrian improvements.
Ashley’s extensive expertise in
multimodal transportation and leadership on projects
like South Midland Avenue in Glenwood Springs and
the Steamboat Springs US40 West Trail make her the
ideal choice for community-focused, accessible
design. Ashley is currently the PM for Pitkin
County’s Brush Creek to AABC Trail Feasibility
Study and has worked on other major projects such as
the Truscott Trail, Castle Creek Trail and Redstone
Bridge.
Dan Cokley, PE, PTOE | Transportation/Traffic Engineer
Dan is an SGM Principal and a
Senior Traffic Engineer with 35
years of experience finding unique
solutions to the challenges of
transportation design and traffic
engineering in Western Colorado. Dan is one of the
few engineers on the Western Slope with dual
registration as a Professional Engineer and
Professional Traffic Operations Engineer. Dan was
the Project Manager for the AABC Traffic Impact
Study.
Rachel Brenneman | Public Engagement
Rachel is a veteran communication,
marketing strategist, and owner of
Manifest Communications with 25
years of work experience. She
specializes in helping organizations
define their identity and goals then translating key
information into strategic plans, messaging platforms,
outreach efforts and campaigns. Known as an expert
project manager, she has a track record for
implementing projects on time and on budget. Rachel
has extensive experience working in the Roaring Fork
Valley and with Pitkin County and will serve as the
local engagement expert.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 18
References
Requirement D
East End Multimodal Plan
Pagosa Springs, CO | 2021-2022
In December 2022, Pagosa Springs adopted the East
End Multimodal Plan which provides a framework for
creating stronger and safer transportation connections
between the central core and the eastern part of town,
which are currently separated by the San Juan River.
Alta served as prime consultant for this project and
SGM was a key subconsultant.
The central core of town is home to natural hot
springs, a bustling shopping and restaurant scene,
a scenic riverwalk, and overt community identity.
The Multimodal Plan provided recommendations to
create a well-connected and continuous experience
for people walking, driving, and biking and also
focused on enhancing access to river and recreational
amenities. A key outcome of the process was the
inclusion of three roundabouts for both traffic
calming and vehicular circulation improvements.
CLIENT
Town of Pagosa Springs
551 Hot Springs Boulevard
Pagosa Springs, CO 81147
REFERENCE
James Dickoff
Planning Department Director
Town of Pagosa Springs
(970) 264-4151 x225
jdickhoff@pagosasprings.co.gov
The team used extensive public engagement to
develop and finalize the preferred alternative,
including four open houses, a virtual open house and
project website, a community survey, business-owner
workshops, and illustrative graphics and renderings.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 19
Requirement D
Aspen Safety Action Plan
Aspen, CO | 2024
Alta led the development of a Safety Action Plan for
the City of Aspen. The project involved a safety and
crash analysis that identified themes and contextual
factors for the City’s top safety locations, particularly
for those walking, bicycling, and taking transit in
Aspen.
The team utilized extensive public engagement
to develop and finalize preferred alternatives.
Engagement efforts, led by Manifest
Communication, included project pop-ups at
Aspen transit hubs and weekend farmers markets,
community and stakeholder interviews, a walking
tour of key corridors and safety hot-spots around
Aspen, and online surveys.
Our team integrated findings from public engagement
with data analysis to enhance the recommendations
for Aspen.
CLIENT
City of Aspen
427 Rio Grande Place
Aspen, CO 81611
REFERENCE
PJ Murray
Project Manager
City of Aspen
(970) 920-5055
pj.murray@aspen.gov
The final report provided specific actionable
recommendations for the City of Aspen to implement
and included a Safety Countermeasure Toolkit.
This toolkit outlined treatment types that addressed
the highest priority crash behaviors within the city,
offering an ongoing resource for systematically
improving safety into the future.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 20
Requirement D
Comprehensive Safety Action
Plan
Glenwood Springs, CO | 2024–Ongoing
Alta is serving as a subcontractor on the development
of the City of Glenwood Springs Comprehensive
Safety Action Plan. Alta plays a pivotal role in this
project by leading the analysis and development
of active transportation and transit safety
recommendations, as well as overseeing public and
stakeholder engagement efforts.
Our team has conducted an in-depth analysis
of crashes involving pedestrians, cyclists, and
micromobility users to identify high-risk areas and
key crash trends. This data-driven approach allows us
to focus our safety recommendations on the locations
with the greatest need. In addition to our technical
analysis, we have implemented a comprehensive
engagement strategy, utilizing in-person meetings,
surveys, and an interactive online map to collect
valuable input from community members. To
address inclusivity, we have also conducted in-person
meetings with Spanish translation services to engage
underrepresented populations effectively.
CLIENT
City of Glenwood Springs
101 W Eighth Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
REFERENCE
Lee Barger
Transportation Engineer
City of Glenwood Springs
(970) 384-6448
lee.barger@cogs.us
We have worked closely with RFTA to incorporate
RFTA transit safety data and coordinate on transit-
specific recommendations, offering a holistic
approach to transportation safety.
Building on the insights gained from both data
analysis and public feedback, our team will develop
detailed, actionable recommendations rooted in the
Safe Systems approach. These recommendations will
be categorized into two key areas: citywide systemic
safety improvements and targeted, location-specific
interventions to address high-risk areas for vulnerable
road users.
The recommendations will be designed to position
the City for potential grant opportunities to secure
implementation funding.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 21
Additional Project Experience
Willits Lane Connectivity and
Town Wayfinding Plan
Basalt, CO | 2023–Ongoing
Alta is working with the Town of Basalt to evaluate
Willits Lane, a primary corridor in the town that
connects its Historic Downtown on the east to
the Willits area and Design Center on the west.
The plan aims to promote alternative modes of
transportation as a tool to achieving the Town’s
Climate Action goals, improve user conflicts, and
improve infrastructure to make movement along
Willits Lane safer and more comfortable for all users.
Alta is evaluating existing conditions and corridor
needs to create design concepts for improvements to
enhance multimodal connectivity and safety, along
with creating a wayfinding sign family and plan for
the Town.
CLIENT
Town of Basalt
101 Midland Ave
Basalt, CO 81621
REFERENCE
Michelle Bonfils Thibeault, AICP
Planning Director
Town of Basalt
(970) 279-4397
michelle.thibeault@basalt.net
Public engagement is an important aspect of this
project to arrive at a supported recommended
concept. Alta led facilitation of two public open
houses, online surveys, and community pop-ups to
gather feedback for challenges and goals for Willits
Lane, as well as opinions guiding toward a preferred
concept for the corridor improvements.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 22
Additional Project Experience
RFTA First and Last Mile
Mobility Study
Aspen, CO | 2021-2022
Alta played a vital role in assisting the RFTA region
in devising a comprehensive set of first/last mile
strategies aimed at enhancing transit accessibility.
Our efforts focused on formulating strategies that
catered to the entire region, as well as tailoring
specific strategies to individual communities such as
Aspen, Glenwood Springs, Carbondale, Basalt, New
Castle, and Snowmass Village.
The project initiation involved conducting an
in-depth assessment of the existing first and last mile
services, infrastructure, technology, and modes of
transportation within the region. This evaluation
served as a foundation for our subsequent work.
Following the completion of desktop research and
analysis of the prevailing first and last mile services,
our team closely collaborated with the project’s
CLIENT
Roaring Fork Transit Authority (RFTA)
1340 Main Street
Carbondale, CO 81623
Technical Advisory Committee, incorporating
feedback from the public and stakeholders.
Through this collaborative process, we developed
a toolkit comprising a range of first and last mile
solutions that were applicable to the entire region. To
facilitate implementation, we also formulated first/
last mile typologies, which provided a framework for
effectively applying the strategies in diverse contexts,
including cities, towns, BRT stops, and local bus
stops.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 23
Additional Project Experience
8th Street Design
Carbondale, CO | 2020-2021
8th Street in Carbondale functions as a collector
roadway that provides north/south connectivity
running parallel to State Highway 133 (SH-133).
Part of 8th Street goes through a dense residential
area with minimal pedestrian or multimodal
infrastructure, while also connecting to the Rio
Grande Trail, a major regional trail. Over the years,
safety concerns have been raised related to excessive
speed, truck traffic volume, the narrowness or lack of
sidewalks, and lack of bicycle infrastructure.
Alta evaluated the corridor and developed three
design options to transform 8th Street into a safe
and comfortable multimodal corridor. To address
concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic, Alta
employed an interactive web tool to gather public
input. The public provided feedback about how the
corridor was perceived in its existing condition, and
CLIENT
Town of Carbondale
511 Colorado Avenue
Carbondale, CO 81623
what their goals were for the corridor; they also gave
input on three design concepts to ultimately develop
one recommended design.
The final design includes a narrower shared roadway
with 6’ sidewalks on both sides and traffic calming
elements (curb extensions and raised crossings) at
strategic locations along the corridor. Alta prepared
the Town to implement the recommended concept
with an engineering cost estimate and phasing plan.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 24
Additional Project Experience
Ada County Highway District
Neighborhood Plans
Boise, ID | 2021-2024
Over the last three years, Alta has worked with
the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) to
develop several neighborhood transportation plans,
specifically Boise West Bench, Meridian Downtown,
and Barber Valley. ACHD has segmented the County
into 16 smaller neighborhood planning areas for
the purpose of doing more in-depth analysis and
transportation needs assessment than is practical at
the County scale. Each neighborhood transportation
plan emphasizes bicycle and pedestrian network
analysis, City partner collaboration, public outreach,
project identification, and project prioritization.
CLIENT
Ada County Highway District
3775 Adams Street
Garden City, ID 83714
Recommendations from each plan are then
considered for inclusion in ACHD’s Integrated Five
Year Work Plan, which is updated on an annual basis.
Pedestrian Projects Under Consideration
Boise West Bench Neighborhood Transportation Plan
Instructions
Project List
Have a comment on a recommended project? See a need or project idea
that we missed?
Place a numbered sticker dot on the map at the location you want
to comment on (sticker dots provided by a Project Team Member).
Please try to avoid covering important map information.
Record your sticker number and comment on the flip chart
associated with this map.
Feel free to make as many comments as you wish. If you need more stickers,
see a Project Team Member to receive more.
Sidewalk Improvements
Crossing Improvements
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
HobbleCreek Park
Hyatt HiddenLakes Reserve
Redwood Park Winstead Park
ChesnutHillsPathway
Skyline Park
NottinghamPark
WestMoreland Park
MountainView Park
SterlingSite
Hewett ParkCottonwoodPark
DeMeyerPark
Jullion Park
Divotz
Ustick
Or
c
h
a
r
d
Fi
v
e
M
i
l
e
Emerald
Mi
t
c
h
e
l
l
Northview
Ustick
Cu
r
t
i
s
De Meyer
McMillan
Sh
a
m
r
o
c
k
Stra
t
ford
Gl
e
n
w
o
o
d
Ju
l
l
i
o
n
Goldenrod
Joplin
Edna
Goddard
LindaVis
t
a
Cory As
h
P
a
r
k
Clo
v
e
r
d
a
l
e
Mil
w
a
u
k
e
e
Es
q
u
ireGranger
Lib
e
r
t
y
Linda Vista
Irving
BristolHeights
Poplar
Executive
Mountain
Vie
w
Fairview
Horseshoe Bend
Franklin
Kootenai
Pie
r
c
e
P
a
r
k
Fairvie w
Barrister
Taft
Ke
n
t
Ma
p
l
e
G
r
o
v
e
Ea
g
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
t
e
r
H
i
l
l
36
t
h
Ga
r
y
Pine
Gar
r
e
t
t
Hi
c
k
o
ry
EllensFerry
Co
f
f
e
y
Ad
a
m
s
Riverside
Marigold
Bo
g
a
r
t
Cassia
Caswell
Ph
i
l
l
i
p
p
i
Co
l
e
Chinde
n
Sta
t
e
Emerald
All
u
m
b
a
u
g
h
Catalpa
RoseHill
Veterans
M
e
m orial
Gillis
Ar
n
ey
50th
HillRoa
d
Ro
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
Franklin
Johns
Landing
Du
n
c
a
n
Castle
44th
Chinden
Syca
m
o
r
e
Is
l
and
Wood
Alw
o
r
t
h
Irving
Mace Hwy 44 Utahna
Hw
y
5
5
184
84
Magnolia Park
WillowLane Park Sunset Park
BorahPark Cassia Park
Liberty Park
OwensPark
MorrisHill Park
Gary LaneSite
VeteransMemorial Park
EstherSimplotSite
PolecatGulchReserve
Bernardine QuinnRiverside Park
CastleHills Park
Catalpa Park
Champion Park
LadybirdPark
BriarHill Park
Reid W Merrill SrCommunity Park
PierceGreens
Plantation
Banbury
Easement
Julius M.KleinerMemorial Park
WhiteWaterPark
RiverfrontPark
SeamanGulch Area
Franklin Site
P2
3
P17
P2
5
P3
4
P26
P9
P3
P37
P18
P7
P38
P2
4
P5
P10
P16
P11
P28
P32
P2
P2
0
P36
P8
P31
P2
2
P6
P2
1
P1
P3
3
P1
9
P14
P1
2
P27
P13
P
4
P35
P15
P
3
9
P30
P29
C2
C3
C5
C6
C8
C9
C7 C1
C4
GA
R
D
E
N
C
I
T
Y
BO
I
S
E
GA
R
D
E
N
C
I
T
Y
EA
G
L
E
ME
R
I
D
I
A
N
BO
I
S
E
BOISEEAGLE
BO
I
S
E
Dat
a
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
A
C
H
D
.
D
a
t
e
s
a
v
e
d
:
5
/
2
2
/
2
0
2
3
.
Boise West Bench NeighborhoodTransportation Plan
RECOMMENDED
PEDESTRIAN
PROJECTS
0 0.5 1 1.5
MILES
Pedestrian Improvement Projects
!Crossing Improvement Projects
GARDEN CITY
KUNA
MERIDIAN
STAR
BOISE
EAGLE
84
1 MILE
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
HobbleCreek Park
Hyatt HiddenLakes Reserve
Redwood Park Winstead Park
ChesnutHillsPathway
Skyline Park
NottinghamPark
WestMoreland Park
MountainView Park
SterlingSite
Hewett ParkCottonwoodPark
DeMeyerPark
Jullion Park
Divotz
Ustick
Or
c
h
a
r
d
Fiv
e
M
i
l
e
Emerald
Mit
c
h
e
l
l
Northview
Ustick
Cu
r
t
i
s
De Meyer
McMillan
Sh
a
m
r
o
c
k
Stratford
Gle
n
w
o
o
d
Ju
l
l
i
o
n
Goldenrod
Joplin
Edna
Goddard
LindaVis
t
a
Cory As
h
P
a
r
k
Cl
o
v
e
r
d
a
l
e
Mi
l
w
a
u
k
e
e
Es
q
u
ireGranger
Lib
e
r
t
y
Linda Vista
Irving
Bristol
H
e
ights
Poplar
Executive
Mountain
Vi
e
w
Fairview
Horseshoe Bend
Franklin
Kootenai
Pi
e
r
c
e
P
a
r
k
Fairvie w
Barrister
Taft
Ke
n
t
Ma
p
l
e
G
r
o
v
e
Ea
g
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
t
e
r
Hil
l
36
t
h
Ga
r
y
Pine
Gar
r
e
t
t
Hic
k
o
ry
EllensFerry
Co
f
f
e
y
Ad
a
m
s
Riverside
Marigold
Bo
g
a
r
t
Cassia
Caswell
Ph
i
l
l
i
p
p
i
Co
l
e
Chinden
Sta
t
e
Emerald
All
u
m
b
a
u
g
h
Catalpa
Ro
seHill
Vete
r
a
n
s
M
e
m orial
Gillis
Arn
ey
50th
HillRoad
Ro
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
Franklin
John
s
Landing
Duncan
Castle
44th
Chinden
Syca
m
o
r
e
IslandWood
Alw
o
r
t
h
Irving
Mace Hwy 44 UtahnaHwy 55
184
84
Magnolia Park
WillowLane Park Sunset Park
BorahPark Cassia Park
Liberty Park
OwensPark
MorrisHill Park
Gary LaneSite
VeteransMemorial ParkEstherSimplotSite
PolecatGulchReserve
Bernardine QuinnRiverside Park
CastleHills Park
Catalpa Park
Champion Park
LadybirdPark
BriarHill Park
Reid W Merrill SrCommunity Park
PierceGreens
Plantation
Banbury
Easement
Julius M.KleinerMemorial Park
WhiteWaterPark
RiverfrontPark
SeamanGulch Area
Franklin Site
P2
3
P17
P2
5
P3
4
P26
P9
P3
P37
P18
P7
P38
P2
4
P5
P10
P16
P11
P28
P32
P2
P2
0
P36
P8
P31
P2
2
P6
P2
1
P1
P3
3
P1
9
P14
P1
2
P27
P13
P
4
P35
P15
P
3
9
P30
P29
C2
C3
C5
C6
C8
C9
C7 C1
C4
GA
R
D
E
N
C
I
T
Y
BO
I
S
E
GA
R
D
E
N
C
I
T
Y
EA
G
L
E
ME
R
I
D
I
A
N
BO
I
S
E
BOISEEAGLE
BO
I
S
E
Da
t
a
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
A
C
H
D
.
D
a
t
e
s
a
v
e
d
:
5
/
2
2
/
2
0
2
3
.
Boise West Bench NeighborhoodTransportation Plan
RECOMMENDEDPEDESTRIANPROJECTS
0 0.5 1 1.5
MILES
Pedestrian Improvement Projects
!Crossing Improvement Projects
GARDEN CITY
KUNA
MERIDIAN
STAR
BOISE
EAGLE
84
1
2
P1 Allumbaugh St, Fairview Ave / Northview St
P2 Benjamin Ln, Franklin Rd / Emerald St
P3 Bridger St, Discovery Way / Meeker Ave
P4 Clement Dr, Mountain View Dr / Mountain View Dr
P5 Clover Meadows Dr, Sharon Dr / Cloverdale Rd
P6 Cory Ln, Mitchell St / Maple Grove Rd
P7 Demeyer St-Lena Ave, Cloverdale Rd / Demeyer Park
P8 Edna St, Mitchell St / Maple Grove Rd
P9 Emerald St, Benjamin Ln / Milwaukee St
P10 Emerald St, Camelot Dr / Raymond St
P11 Emerald St, Rifleman St / Cole Rd
P12 Esquire Dr, Northview St / Ustick Rd
P13 Executive Dr, Cloverdale Rd / Meadowland Dr
P14 Fairview Rd, Curtis Rd / Orchard St
P15 Franklin Rd, Five Mile Rd / Bethel St
P16 Goddard Rd, Milwaukee St / Glenwood Rd
P17 Goldenrod Ave, Buckboard St / Five Mile Rd
P18 Irving St, Mitchell St / Kimball St
P19 Liberty St, Fairview Ave / Northview St
P20 Linda Vista Ave, Cory Ln / Ustick Rd
P21 Linda Vista Ave, Edna St / McMillan Rd
P22 Maple Grove Rd, Ustick Rd / Edna St
P23 Meadowland Dr, Emerald St / President Dr
P24 Milwaukee St, Marcum St / Ustick Rd
P25 Mitchell St, Ramsgate Dr / Mountain View Dr
P26 Mountain View Dr, Glenwood St / Cole Rd
P27 Mountain View Dr, Mitchell / Maple Grove
P28 Northview St, Hartman St / Curtis Rd
P29 Northview St, Maple Grove Rd / Curtis Rd
P30 Poplar St, Cole Rd / Curtis Rd
P31 Preece Dr, Cole Rd / Milwaukee St
P32 Shamrock Ave, Edna St / McMillan Rd
P33 Shamrock Ave, Fairview Ave / King St
P34 Sunflower Ln, Hampton St / Maple Grove Rd
P35 Ustick Rd, McKinney St / Mountain View Dr
P36 Settlers Ave, Ash Park Ln / Cole Rd
P37 Wesley Dr, Westland Dr / Cole Rd
P38 Westpark St, Benjamin Ln / Milwaukee St
P39 Wildwood St, Fairview Ave / Ustick Rd
C1 Cole Rd / Poplar St
C2 Five Mile Rd / Bridgetower Dr & Saranac Dr
C3 Five Mile Rd / Hickory Dr
C4 Five Mile Rd / Lancelot Ave
C5 Maple Grove Rd / Edna St
C6 Maple Grove Rd / Shoup Dr
C7 Milwaukee St / Wesley Dr
C8 Mitchell St / Cory Ln
C9 Ustick Rd / Grenadier Way
Thank you for your feedback!
Map 1 of 3
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 25
Additional Project Experience
Near Northwest Neighborhood
Planning Initiative
Denver, CO | 2021-2024
As a subconsultant, Alta provided mobility
recommendations for the City of Denver’s Near
Northwest Area Plan, which involved planning for
a cluster of four Denver neighborhoods. The Near
Northwest area contains predominantly residential
development, two interstate highways, the South
Platte River, many schools, three “Stroads,” and
historic street car commercial strips.
Through public open houses, project Steering
Committee meetings, targeted outreach, and surveys,
the neighborhoods expressed the desire to increase
the priority of multimodal transportation on city
streets. Alta determined how to increase safety and
CLIENT
City of Denver Community Planning and
Development
201 W Colfax Ave, Ste 205
Denver, CO 80202
permeability for pedestrians across major barriers,
how to improve and connect the bike network for
lower-stress tolerant riders on narrow streets, and
how to balance transit routes with other modal
needs. Alta also supported development of green
infrastructure recommendations to address the
impacts of extreme heat and improve the multimodal
experience.
All project recommendations were vetted for initial
feasibility and compliance with the Denver Complete
Street Design Guidelines.
Existing conditionsRecommended improvements
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 26
Additional Project Experience
South Fulton Bus Stop
Safety Analysis
Atlanta, GA | 2023
The South Fulton Community Improvement District
(SFCID) is a freight cluster south of Atlanta.
The district is home to numerous industrial and
warehouse facilities that are served by major
roadways and rail, and some employees are
dependent on transit to get to work. The large amount
of freight movement, train tracks, and roadway
design create safety issues for pedestrians, cyclists,
and transit riders.
Alta was hired by SFCID to audit the bus stops
in and adjacent to the district to prioritize safety
investments. We conducted a geospatial analysis of
stops that included a review of adjacent roadway
characteristics, the presence or lack of sidewalks and
curbs, crash data, rail infrastructure, and bus stop
amenities. This information was used to identify the
bus stops most in need of safety investments.
CLIENT
South Fulton Community Improvement District 900 DeKalb Ave NE
Atlanta, GA 30307
Alta staff than surveyed transit riders at the
prioritized bus stops to determine their destinations
within the SFCID. This information was used
to recommend infrastructure investments and
the movement of bus stops to improve safe
access. SFCID is using the information to pursue
service adjustments and grants for infrastructure
investments.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 27
Proposal Form Requirement E
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
13
PROPOSAL FORM
Proposal Time: 2:00 PM MT
Proposal Date: February 7, 2025
From:
Phone E-mail Address:
To: THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS c/o Procurement
530 E Main Street, Suite #304 Aspen, CO 81611
For: RFP 031.25: AABC MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
101 SW Main Street, Suite 2000,
Portland, OR 97204(503) 230-9862westbids@altago.com
Pursuant to a request by the Pitkin County Commissioners, the undersigned Proposer having examined this Request for Proposals (RFP), including familiarization of the site
and/or the conditions of the proposed Service environment, including the availability of materials and labor hereby proposes to furnish all labor, materials, supplies, applicable
permits, services, and supervision required to provide a completed product as detailed in this RFP and adjoining documentation for the sum of:
$199,991_________________________________
Fee Schedule(s) for this project and any applicable work that may not have been included
in the Scope of Work but may be necessary for successful completion must be included in the proposal documents.
Approach, Qualifications, and References may be submitted on your own proposal form; please indicate “In attached documents” for any items omitted herein. A completed
proposal form including, at minimum, acknowledgement of all addenda and signature/corporate seal is required for proposals to be considered responsive.
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 28
RFP 031.25 Rev. 2021.10.11 CDD
14
Statement and Detailed Approach to Service:
Qualifications of Proposer:
Please insert names address, phone numbers and description of similar Service for Reference Checks.
1.
2.
3.
It is further understood that the right is reserved by the County to reject any and all proposals and it is agreed that the proposals may not be withdrawn for a period of ten (10)
days from specified time for receiving proposals.
The Proposer acknowledges receipt of Addenda Nos. .
The right is reserved to waive any informalities and to reject any Proposal.
(Type/Print name under all signatures)
Dated this day of , 2025
(Corporate seal) PROPOSER:
SIGNATURES: If the proposal is being submitted by a Corporation, the Proposal Form should be signed by an officer, i.e. President or vice-president. The signature of the officer signing shall be attested to by the secretary and properly sealed. If the proposal is
being submitted by an individual or a partnership, the proposal shall so indicate and be properly signed.
Please see attached documents.
Please see attached documents.
1
Mike Rose, Vice President
as duly authorized Katie Mangle, Secretary
7 February
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 29
Subcontractors Requirement F
SGM is a multidisciplinary engineering, surveying,
and consulting firm that was founded in 1986. For
over 39 years, SGM employees have lived and raised
families in the Western Slope communities they
have helped build. SGM’s services are delivered with
unparalleled authenticity and pride with attention to
quality and detail. As a result of SGM’s commitment
to quality service and long-term client relationships,
SGM has grown to over 125 employees –the largest
full-service engineering, consulting, and surveying
firm in Western Colorado.
SGM is headquartered in Glenwood Springs and
has offices in Aspen, Durango, Grand Junction,
Gunnison, Meeker, and Salida to provide local and
timely service to our clients.
SGM has been serving as a partner to municipal and
county clients for decades. Their ability to maintain
strong client relationships over such extended time
periods demonstrates the success of an approach
based on listening, building trusted relationships,
maintaining integrity, always upholding the client’s
and community’s interests, and providing real value.
SGM has served Pitkin County for over 35 years,
including as the County’s On-Call Engineer since
2012. They know the local valleys and Pitkin County
and genuinely enjoy the partnerships they have
forged with County staff. SGM is eager to continue
supporting the needs of the County and will continue
to provide responsive, reliable, service.
Manifest Communication is a strategic
communication consultant that provides brand,
marketing and outreach expertise for businesses and
municipalities working to make the world a better
place. Founded in 2008, they have offices in Aspen
and Carbondale, Colorado to serve the Roaring Fork
Valley and beyond.
Manifest Communication first partnered with Pitkin
County for the 2020 Census, leading an extensive
outreach and education campaign that engaged 12
government offices, 200+ organizations, businesses,
and media outlets. They have also worked on the
County’s Strategic Communication Plan and the
Climate Action Plan. Manifest is currently an on-call
communications resource for the County.
Manifest Communication’s work in the region also
includes:
• Snowmass Tourism Destination Management Plan
Outreach/Facilitation
• Aspenites for Action Political Campaign
• Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Political Campaign
• City of Aspen Safety Action Plan Public
Engagement
• City of Aspen Environmental Health and
Sustainability Department Campaign Development
• Aspen Skiing Company Aspen Mountain
Expansion Community Outreach
• City of Aspen Building IQ Outreach and
Communication Support
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 30
Fee Schedule
Requirement G
Principal - TDM Programs Sr Associate - TDM Planning Associate II - TDM Planning Associate Engineer I Principal Planner II
Engineering Designer I Project Accountant Alta's Hours Alta Expenses
AAllttaa''ss SSuubb TToottaall PM / Lead Engineer Traffic Engineer Transportation Engineer Hours SSGGMM Strategic Planning Outreach Execution Overall Project Management Hours MMaanniiffeesstt
Matthew
Kaufman
Jonathon(Jonny
) Rotheram Amy Johnson Chloe Ward
Brandon
Gonzalez Bryan Leyba Susana Zerbe Ashley Turner
Ashley Cline, PE Dan Cokley, PE, PTOE Eric Mahoney, EI
SSuubb TToottaall Rachel Brenneman
SSuubb TToottaall
2025 Hourly Rate*$255 $185 $185 $185 $255 $130 $130 $120 $180 $250 $140 $225 $200 $150
TTaasskk 11 PPrroojjeecctt MMaannaaggeemmeenntt 99 5566 2222 1188 00 00 00 1166 112211 77000000 $$2288,,997755 7766 00 1122 8888 $$1155,,336600 00 3388 1166 5544 $$1100,,000000 226633 $$5544,,333355
1.1 Project Management and Administration 5 20 10 16 51 7000 $15,745 48 48 $8,640 16 16 $2,400 115 $26,785
1.2 P roject Team Communication 2 16 8 10 36 $6,800 12 12 24 $3,840 26 26 $5,200 86 $15,840
1.3 Communication with the TAC 22 2200 44 88 34 $6,430 1166 16 $2,880 1122 12 $2,400 62 $11,710
TTaasskk 22 EExxiissttiinngg CCoonnddiittiioonnss AAnnaallyyssiiss 77 4411 3388 3377 22 6666 00 00 119911 00 $$3322,,333355 4400 2244 6666 113300 $$2222,,444400 00 00 00 00 $$00 332211 $$5544,,777755
2.1 Plan and Policy Review 8 6 2 12 28 $4,520 0 $0 0 $0 28 $4,520
2.2 Data Collection and Geospacial Analysis 2 4 8 4 14 32 $5,290 0 $0 0 $0 32 $5,290
2.3 Data Analysis 22 88 88 44 2244 46 $7,330 3322 1166 4422 90 $15,640 0 $0 136 $22,970
2.4 Bicycling and Walking Safety Audits (BWSA)22 55 44 1155 88 34 $5,990 0 $0 0 $0 34 $5,990
2.5 Multimodal Gap Analysis 11 44 44 1100 22 88 29 $5,135 88 88 2244 40 $6,800 0 $0 69 $11,935
2.6 Draft and Final Existing Conditions Report 1122 88 22 22 $4,070 0 $0 0 $0 22 $4,070
TTaasskk 33..00 SSttaakkeehhoollddeerr aanndd PPuubblliicc OOuuttrreeaacchh 00 88 1100 1144 00 44 00 00 3366 00 $$66,,444400 44 00 00 44 $$772200 3366 7700 00 110066 $$2222,,110000 114466 $$2299,,226600
3.1 Development of Engagement Plan 2 2 $370 0 $0 22 6 28 $6,150 30 $6,520
3.2 Stakeholder Interviews and Small Group Meetings & Associated Materials 2 4 4 10 $1,850 0 $0 30 30 $6,000 40 $7,850
3.3 Public Pop-up Events & Associated Materials 22 44 66 12 $2,220 0 $0 88 1188 26 $5,400 38 $7,620
3.4 Community E vent 22 22 44 44 12 $2,000 44 4 $720 66 1166 22 $4,550 38 $7,270
TTaasskk 44..00 PPrrooppoosseedd MMuullttiimmooddaall FFaacciilliittiieess NNeettwwoorrkk 66 3300 2222 3322 22 4488 4400 00 118800 00 $$2299,,002200 88 1166 2244 4488 $$88,,880000 00 00 00 00 $$00 222288 $$3377,,882200
4.1 Comprehensive Plan of Proposed Multimodal Facilities 2 16 14 12 2 34 12 92 $14,770 10 16 26 $4,740 0 $0 118 $19,510
4.2 Prioritization Matrix and Implementation 4 14 8 8 14 8 56 $9,430 6 8 14 $2,620 0 $0 70 $12,050
4.3 Cost E stimates 1122 2200 32 $4,820 88 8 $1,440 0 $0 40 $6,260
TTaasskk 55..00 DDrraafftt aanndd FFiinnaall RReeppoorrttss 33 3366 2200 1122 33 2288 1166 00 111188 00 $$1199,,883300 00 00 00 00 $$00 00 00 00 00 $$00 111188 $$1199,,883300
5.1 Draft R eport 2 20 12 8 2 20 16 80 $13,100 0 $0 0 $0 80 $13,100
5.2 Final Report 1 16 8 4 1 8 38 $6,730 0 $0 0 $0 38 $6,730
SSttaaffff HHoouurrss 2255 117711 111122 111133 77 114466 5566 1166 664466 112288 4400 110022 227700 3366 110088 1166 116600 11007766 $$119966,,002200
LLaabboorr TToottaall $$66,,337755 $$3311,,663355 $$2200,,772200 $$2200,,990055 $$11,,778855 $$1188,,998800 $$77,,228800 $$11,,992200 $$77,,000000 $$111166,,660000 $$2233,,004400 $$1100,,000000 $$1144,,228800 $$4477,,332200 $$88,,110000 $$2211,,660000 $$22,,440000 $$3322,,110000 $$119966,,002200
Subconsultant Markup 5%$$22,,336666 $$11,,660055 $$33,,997711
PPrroojjeecctt TToottaall $$66,,337755 $$3311,,663355 $$2200,,772200 $$2200,,990055 $$11,,778855 $$1188,,998800 $$77,,228800 $$11,,992200 $$111166,,660000 $$2233,,004400 $$1100,,000000 $$1144,,228800 $$4499,,668866 $$88,,110000 $$2211,,660000 $$22,,440000 $$3333,,770055 $$119999,,999911
PPhhaassee
AAllttaa PPllaannnniinngg ++ DDeessiiggnn,, IInncc..SSGGMM MMaanniiffeesstt CCoommmmuunniiccaattiioonnss
TToottaall TTaasskk
HHoouurrss
TToottaall
TTaasskk FFeeee
This proposed budget reflects the scope outlined in this proposal. The Alta team is flexible in our approach and looks
forward to working with the County to finalize the scope and budget to meet the needs of the County and project.
GENERAL NOTES:
• This fee proposal is valid for 90 days from the date submitted.
• Hours and staff assignments can be adjusted by the consultant as needed to
implement the tasks described during the course of the project.
• Hourly rates will be adjusted if work is continued into subsequent year(s).
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 31
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
Bill Rates - 2025
Labor Category RATE Typical Classifications Included in Rate
Labor Category 1 390.00$ Executive Principal
Labor Category 2 360.00$ Executive Principal
Labor Category 3 330.00$ Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 4 315.00$ Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 5 295.00$ Sr. Associate, Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 6 275.00$ Sr. Associate, Principal
Labor Category 7 255.00$ Leader, Sr. Associate, Principal
Labor Category 8 235.00$ Associate II, Sr. Associate, Director, Principal
Labor Category 9 220.00$ Associate I, Associate II, Sr. Associate
Labor Category 10 200.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II, Sr. Associate
Labor Category 11 185.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II
Labor Category 12 170.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II
Labor Category 13 150.00$ Level II, Level III, Associate I
Labor Category 14 140.00$ Level I, Level II, Level III
Labor Category 15 130.00$ Level I, Level II, Level III
Labor Category 16 120.00$ Level I, Level II
Labor Category 17 110.00$ Administration/Specialist
Labor Category 18 100.00$ Intern/Specialist
Rates are presented in US Dollars (US$) and are subject to change at any time.
Subconsultants and reimbursable expenses will be charged at cost + 5% markup.
Mileage will be charged at the provisional standard rate.
In-house reproductions will be charged as follows:
Color copies $0.65/ page
Black and white copies $0.20/page
24” x 36” large format plot $17.50/sheet
36” x 48” large format plot $32.50/sheet
Standard Rates
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
Bill Rates - 2025
Labor Category RATE Typical Classifications Included in Rate
Labor Category 1 390.00$ Executive Principal
Labor Category 2 360.00$ Executive Principal
Labor Category 3 330.00$ Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 4 315.00$ Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 5 295.00$ Sr. Associate, Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 6 275.00$ Sr. Associate, Principal
Labor Category 7 255.00$ Leader, Sr. Associate, Principal
Labor Category 8 235.00$ Associate II, Sr. Associate, Director, Principal
Labor Category 9 220.00$ Associate I, Associate II, Sr. Associate
Labor Category 10 200.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II, Sr. Associate
Labor Category 11 185.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II
Labor Category 12 170.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II
Labor Category 13 150.00$ Level II, Level III, Associate I
Labor Category 14 140.00$ Level I, Level II, Level III
Labor Category 15 130.00$ Level I, Level II, Level III
Labor Category 16 120.00$ Level I, Level II
Labor Category 17 110.00$ Administration/Specialist
Labor Category 18 100.00$ Intern/Specialist
Rates are presented in US Dollars (US$) and are subject to change at any time.
Subconsultants and reimbursable expenses will be charged at cost + 5% markup.
Mileage will be charged at the provisional standard rate.
In-house reproductions will be charged as follows:
Color copies $0.65/ page
Black and white copies $0.20/page
24” x 36” large format plot $17.50/sheet
36” x 48” large format plot $32.50/sheet
Strategic Planning Rate - $225
Implementation and Project Management Rate - $200
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 32
Fee Schedule January 2025 Hourly Rate*
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER ........................................ $250
SENIOR ENGINEER III ......................................... $234
SENIOR ENGINEER II .......................................... $218
SENIOR ENGINEER I ........................................... $199
ENGINEER IV ......................................................... $180
ENGINEER III ......................................................... $165
ENGINEER II .......................................................... $140
ENGINEER I ........................................................... $121
SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER ........................... $179
PROJECT MANAGER ........................................... $166
PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST ........................................ $249
SENIOR SCIENTIST II ........................................... $213
SENIOR SCIENTIST I ............................................ $180
SCIENTIST III ......................................................... $150
SCIENTIST II .......................................................... $125
SCIENTIST I ........................................................... $108
SCIENTIST TECHNICIAN ...................................... $90
PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT .................................. $249
SENIOR CONSULTANT II..................................... $213
SENIOR CONSULTANT I...................................... $177
CONSULTANT III ................................................... $149
CONSULTANT II .................................................... $130
CONSULTANT I ..................................................... $116
TECHNICIAN III ...................................................... $100
TECHNICIAN II ......................................................... $85
TECHNICIAN I .......................................................... $72
CLERICAL ................................................................ $92
SENIOR CADD/GIS............................................... $166
CADD/GIS III .......................................................... $144
CADD/GIS II ........................................................... $130
CADD/GIS I ............................................................ $106
SENIOR CONSTRUCTION TECHNICIAN .......... $157
CONSTRUCTION TECHNICIAN II ...................... $144
CONSTRUCTION TECHNICIAN I ....................... $130
PRINCIPAL SURVEYOR ...................................... $199
LAND SURVEYOR III ............................................ $182
LAND SURVEYOR II ............................................. $164
LAND SURVEYOR I .............................................. $148
SURVEY TECHNICIAN III..................................... $132
SURVEY TECHNICIAN II...................................... $119
SURVEY TECHNICIAN I....................................... $107
FIELD SURVEY (1-Man Crew) ............................. $179
FIELD SURVEY (2-Man Crew) ............................. $238
SUE FIELD PROJECT MANAGER ...................... $216
SUE FIELD TECHNICIAN ..................................... $150
EXPERT TESTIMONY .......................................... $380
*There is 10% upcharge to the rates shown for electrical engineering and a 5% upcharge for water resources staff
REIMBURSABLES Equipment Rate
Vehicle Mileage .................................................................................. Current IRS Standard Mileage Rate
ATV / Snowmobile ................................................................................................................. $125.00/day
UTV ....................................................................................................................................... $250.00/day
Flow Tote .............................................................................................................................. $125.00/day
Reproduction
Black & White Plots ............................................................................................................... $ 5.50/sheet
Mylar Plots ........................................................................................................................... $19.00/sheet
Color Plots ........................................................................................................................... $30.00/sheet
Photocopies ........................................................................................................................... $0.25/page
Miscellaneous
10% will be added to all direct expenses, including FedEx, special delivery and courier charges, special
consultants, subcontractors, laboratory tests, airfare, lodging, meals, car rental, telephone, outside printing
expense, etc. Interest of 1.5% per month will be charged for invoices past 30 days.
Published 12/3/2024
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 33
Resumes Appendix
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
21 years
EDUCATION
MURP, University of Kansas, Lawrence
BS, Civil Engineering,
University of Colorado,
Boulder
AREAS OF EXPERTISE
TDM data and program
analysis
TDM program
development
Parking policy
Stakeholder input
collection / analysis
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
American Planning
Association Member, since
2001
American Institute of
Certified Planners
TRB TDM Committee, Friend of the Committee
Matthew Kaufman, AICP
Principal-in-Charge
Matthew is Alta’s leader of TDM Planning and has 21 years of experience
developing transportation plans and programs that reduce vehicle trips, improve
public health, and support smart land use. His project portfolio spans the United
States and Canada and includes the creation of numerous TDM plans for
redevelopment sites, shopping centers, urban corridors, office developments, and
municipalities. He has extensive experience in the collection of stakeholder input
through surveys, focus groups, and community events.
Relevant Experience
• Denver International Airport Mobility Study, Denver, CO
• City of Denver TDM Plan, CO
• Fort Collins TDM Plan, CO
• Denver Regional Council of Governments TDM Plan, CO
• Westminster TDM Plan, Westminster, CO
• Superior TDM Plan, CO
• Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization TDM Program, Austin, TX
• Maricopa Association of Governments TDM Plan, Phoenix, AZ
• Playa Vista Transportation Management Plan, Los Angeles, CA
• Tennessee Statewide Transportation Demand Management Plan Support
• Hartford Transportation Pilot Research, CT
• MassRIDES Program Assistance, Boston, MA
• Great Park Neighborhoods TMA Plan, Irvine, CA
• South Orange County Multimodal Transportation Study, CA
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 34
Appendix
Jonny Rotheram, RSP1Project Manager
Jonny has over 17 years of experience in transportation planning, community
outreach and influencing travel behavior change. Jonny specializes in multimodal
planning; managing projects from initial data collection through to prioritization
of specific improvements and plan adoption. His experience also spans developing
TDM programs to complement infrastructure improvements with an eye on
equity impacts. Jonny has experience leading research, design and development of
multimodal access to transit, the creation of mobility hubs, Vision Zero plans and
first and last mile solutions.
Relevant Experience
• Denver Vision Zero Action Plan Update, Denver, CO
• DRCOG Regional TDM Strategic Plan, Denver, CO
• Denver Moves Everyone, Denver, CO
• City of Denver’s Shared Micromobility Plan, Denver, CO
• RFTA First and Last Mile Plan, Aspen, CO
• Atlanta Neighborhoods Safety Action Plans, Atlanta, GA
• RTD First and Last Mile Strategic Plan, Denver, CO
• SCAG Go Human Toolbox, Los Angeles, CA
• Denver Bicycle Safety Action Plan, Denver, CO
• City of Glenwood Springs TMA Feasibility Study, Glenwood, CO
• Transportation Solutions TMA Support, Glendale, CO
• West Corridor TMA Program Management, Denver Region, CO
• ARC Bike-Transit Plan, Atlanta, GA
• Bicycle Audits Great Park Neighborhoods, Irvine, CA
• Bicycle Colorado Program Support, CO
• Massachusetts Safe Routes to School, Boston, MA
• PPACG Regional Active Transportation Plan, Colorado Springs, CO
• Denver South Regional Bicycle Plan, CO
• AUC-4 Mobility Solutions, Centennial, CO
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE
17 years
EDUCATION
Master of Transport
Planning, University of
Leeds, UK
BS, Geography and Computing, University of Manchester, UK
AREAS OF
EXPERTISE
Active Transportation
Planning and transit
Equity integration
Project management
Public/stakeholder engagement
Safety analysis and Vision
Zero
TDM initiatives and
planning
REGISTRATIONS
Road Safety Professional®
(Level 1 #1342)
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 35
Amy Johnson, AICP
Assistant Project Manager/Planning Lead
Amy is a Principal Transportation Planner with 16 years of experience in both
the public and private sectors. She has led and supported TDM planning efforts at
the state, regional, and local efforts. Amy’s work is data-driven. She has a unique
ability to collect, analyze, and organize data that provides clear insights and yields
informed planning decisions. Her analytical skills come from an attention to
detail, making her a highly capable project manager.
Relevant Experience
• Fort Collins TDM Plan, CO
• City of Denver Developer TDM Plan, CO
• City of Denver Internal TDM Plan, CO
• Denver International Airport Mobility Study, Denver, CO
• The Henry TDM Plan, Denver, CO
• UCHealth Cherry Creek TDM Plan, Denver, CO
• Denver Moves Everyone 2050, Denver, CO
• Atlantic Station Connect, Atlanta, GA
• RTD First and Last Mile Study, Denver, CO
• Perimeter Connects First and Last Mile Support, Atlanta, GA
• Lone Tree Walk and Wheel Plan, CO
• City of Denver Conceptual Bicycle Design, CO
• Walnut Street Parking Conversion, Denver, CO
• Jackson/Teton County Integrated Transportation Plan, Jackson, WY
• Town of Parker Transportation Master Plan, CO
• Casper Area Long Range Transportation Plan, WY
• PlanCheyenne: Transportation Plan, Cheyenne, WY
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE
16 years
EDUCATION
MURP, University of
Colorado
BS, Economics, John Carroll University
AREAS OF
EXPERTISE
TDM plans
Survey design & analysis
Municipal TDM
regulations
TMA feasibility studies
Mobility plans
First and Last Mile studies
Safe Routes to School planning
REGISTRATIONS
American Institute of Certified Planners
American Planning
Association
Appendix
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 36
Appendix
Brandon Gonzalez, AICP
Active Transportation Advisor
Brandon is a Principal and Southwest Region Leader at Alta who is based in
Phoenix. He is an experienced transportation planner and multidisciplinary
Project Manager. Brandon’s core competencies include transportation planning,
corridor planning and design, trail planning and design, Complete Streets, and
vulnerable road user safety. He offers deep experience facilitating advisory groups
and elected bodies, building consensus, and leading successful public engagement
and visioning exercises. Brandon has worked in both the public and private
sectors and he understands the challenges and opportunities associated with active
transportation planning. He works closely with his clients to find tailored solutions
to their unique transportation needs.
Relevant Experience
• Pagosa Springs East End Multimodal Plan, CO
• Denver Regional Council of Governments Active Transportation Plan, CO
• Aspen SS4A Safety Action Plan, CO
• Teton County SS4A Safety Action Plan, WY
• Phoenix Connected Active Networks (PhxCAN), AZ
• 3rd Avenue Protected Bike Lane, Phoenix, AZ
• NMDOT Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment and Strategic Highway Safety Plan
• Westside Bicycle Boulevards, Tucson, AZ
• ADOT Transportation Alternative Program Development
• Dallas Bicycle System Plan Update, TX
• El Paso Vision Zero Action Plan, TX
• New Mexico DOT Long Range Transportation Plan, Phases I and II
• Phoenix Active Transportation Master Plan, AZ
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE
17 years
EDUCATION
MCRP, University of Texas
at Arlington
BA, Political Science, Minor in Spanish, Texas Tech University
AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Public outreach
Safety
Long range planning
Trail network planning
Bicycle facility design
REGISTRATIONS
American Institute of
Certified Planners
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 37
Appendix
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
10 years
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering,
Iowa State University
AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Multi-use trail design
On-street bicycle design
Wayfinding
Design guidelines
REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer: CO (#0056849); AZ (#71106); UT (#11782267-2202); ID (P-21461); NV (#030607)
PROFESSIONAL
ASSOCIATIONS
WTS - Colorado Chapter
Institute of Transportation
Engineers
Chloe Ward, PE
Lead Engineer
Chloe joined Alta after discovering that her passion for active transportation
could be translated into her career as an engineer. With 10 years of transportation
engineering experience, is an expert in bicycle and pedestrian design ranging
from small mountain towns to dense urban areas. She works on a range of
projects, including on-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities, multiuse pathways
and trails, and design guidelines. She has also provided numerous trainings on
bicycle and pedestrian facility design to DOT, MPO, and City staff across the
country.
Relevant Experience
• Aspen Safety Action Plan, CO
• Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Safety Action Plan
• CDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Trainings
• Willits Lane Connectivity and Town Wayfinding Plan, Basalt, CO
• 3rd Ave Thomas to Osborn Bike/Ped Plan, Phoenix, AZ
• Mountain Village Trails Master Plan and Natural Surface Trail Design, CO
• Safety in the Downtown Core, Aspen, CO
• Carbondale 8th Street Design, CO
• 13th Ave Corridor Multimodal Mobility Study, Aurora, CO
• Community Transportation Networks Planning & Design Services, Denver, CO
• West Area Community Network Planning Services, Denver, CO
• Multimodal Options for a Vibrant Economy (MOVE), Glenwood Springs, CO
• Fort Collins Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design, CO
• Southern Nevada Pedestrian Comfort Study and Demonstration Project
• Mountain Village Trails Master Plan, CO
• Denver Regional Transit District First-Last Mile Strategic Plan, CO
• Mulberry Street Improvements, Fort Collins, CO
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 38
Appendix
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE
6 years
EDUCATION
MUEP, Arizona State
University
Masters in Sustainability Solutions, Arizona State University
Graduate Certificate, GIS,
Arizona State University
BS, Geography, Arizona State University
AREAS OF
EXPERTISE
Extreme heat planning
Urban and climate
resilience
Data and GIS analyses
REGISTRATION
LEED GA: AZ (#11455932)
Bryan Leyba, AICP Candidate
Planner
Bryan is a Planner who is based in the Phoenix office. Having lived, worked, and
traveled in cities all over the world, he believes that they hold the key for us to
solve our greatest climate and equity challenges. Having worked in diverse and
multidisciplinary settings, he brings a collaborative attitude, critical thinking, and
solutions-oriented mindset to everything he does.
Relevant Experience
• Billings Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan Update, MT
• RTC Washoe Neighborhood Network Plans 1 & 2, NV
• Phoenix Anticipatory Warrant Study, AZ
• Los Alamos County Open Space & Trails Management Plan, NM
• MAG 3rd Ave Thomas to Osborn Bike/Ped Plan, Phoenix, AZ
• Nibley City Active Transportation Plan, UT
• University District Circulation Study, Salt Lake City, UT
• Red Mountain Multimodal Study, Maricopa County, AZ
• Detroit Safe Routes To School, MI
• OVRDC Safety Action Plan, Ohio Valley, OH
• Willits Lane Connectivity and Town Wayfinding Plan, Basalt, CO
• MDOT University Region AT Plan and Guide
• Meridian Pathways Master Plan Update, ID
• NMDOT Vulnerable Road User Safety Assessment and Strategic Highway Safety Plan
• Utah Trail Network Outreach Mapping and Support
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 39
Appendix
Soozy Zerbe, EIT
Engineer
Soozy is a California native with a passion for sustainable design. Soozy supports
the Los Angeles Design Team as well as other design teams across the company
on various project types including green infrastructure/urban greening, pedestrian
and cyclist safety, community outreach and more.
Relevant Experience
• Merced Avenue Greenway Design Phase 2, South El Monte, CA
• South Hills Bike Park, Glendora, CA
• Minnesota-Foothill Safe Streets, Glendora, CA
• SGVCOG Sustainable Multimodal Improvement Project, Glendora, CA
• East Oakland Neighborhood Bike Routes, CA
• Downey and South Ped Refuge Islands, Long Beach, CA
• Connecting Coachella, Coachella, CA
• South Pasadena Slow Streets Program, CA
• Laurel Elementary SRTS Design, Oceanside, CA
• Green Alleys Project, Corona, CA
• San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway, Pomona, CA
• Arroyo Simi Trail Master Plan, Moorpark, CA
• San Diego Canal Trail, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, CA
• South Higuera Street Quick Build 10% Concepts, San Luis Obispo, CA
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE
4 years
EDUCATION
MLA, California State
Polytechnic University,
Pomona
BS, Civil Engineering, San Jose State University, CA
AREAS OF
EXPERTISE
Civil Engineering
Design
REGISTRATIONS
Engineer-in-Training: CA (#175935)
PROFESSIONAL
HIGHLIGHTS
American Society of
Landscape Architects,
Member
American Society of Civil Engineers, Member
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 40
Appendix
Ashley Cline, PE
Transportation Engineer
Ashley, SGM’s Transportation Team Leader, has worked for SGM since 2015
and has been involved with the design of large public infrastructure projects. She
has been focused primarily on road and bridge projects but has also worked on
numerous trail projects throughout the Western Slope. Ashley has a well-rounded
background with AutoCAD Civil3D and has applicable project experience in
roadway design, sidewalk, bike lane, multi-use path, intersection, utility design,
roundabout, trail, site grading, drainage, waterline, and sewerline design.
Relevant Experience
• Brush Creek Park and Ride to AABC Trail Feasibility Study, Aspen, CO
• 27th Street & SH82 Pedestrian Underpass, Glenwood Springs, CO
• US-40 West Trail, Steamboat Springs, CO
• South Midland Avenue Improvements, Glenwood Springs, CO
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
9 years
EDUCATION
BSCE Civil Engineering, Michigan Technological University
REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer: CO (#0056117)
Dan Cokley, PE, PTOE
Transportation/Traffic Engineer
Dan is an SGM Principal with 34 years of experience providing traffic and
transportation engineering, civil engineering, and project management for
Western Slope public sector projects. Dan regularly serves as a Principal-in-
Charge for various projects, ensuring overall corporate support and client
satisfaction for the project, as well as providing analysis and recommendations
when needed. He is a proven Project Manager and Design Engineer for a variety
of projects, including state/county/municipal roadway design, district and
municipal infrastructure improvements, resort, and subdivision development, and
dam/water resources permitting.
Relevant Experience
• AABC Traffic Impact Study, Aspen, CO
• US 40 Trail Phase 1 & 2, Granby, CO
• I-70 South Frontage Road Widening and Roundabout, Vail, CO
• ECO Trail, Eagle County, CO
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE
34 years
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering,
University of Minnesota
BA, Dual Degree, Engineering, College of Scholastica
REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer: CO (#0029799)
Professional Traffic
Operations Engineer
(PTOE)
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 41
Appendix
Eric Mahoney, EI
Engineer
Eric is a Design Engineer on the Transportation team, specializing in the design
of large public infrastructure projects. His primary focus is on road and bridge
projects. Eric also has relevant experience with trail projects. Eric has a well-
rounded background with AutoCAD Civil 3D, site design, and project experience
in utility design, site grading, and drainage.
Relevant Experience
• Rangley DOLA Trails, Rangely, CO
• Edwards Metropolitan District Sidewalk, Edwards, CO
• Owl Creek & Brush Creek Roundabout, Snowmass Village, CO
• Granby Workforce Housing Access Lane, Granby, CO
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
3 years
EDUCATION
BS, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley
REGISTRATIONS
Registered Engineering Intern (EI): CO
Rachel Brenneman
Community Engagement Specialist
Rachel is a veteran communication and marketing strategist with 25 years of work
experience following her graduation from the University of Colorado at Boulder
with a degree in Advertising. She specializes in helping organizations define
their identity and goals – then translating key information into strategic plans,
messaging platforms, outreach efforts and campaigns. Known as an expert project
manager, she has a track record for implementing projects on time and on budget.
Relevant Experience
• New Castle Creek Bridge Education and Outreach, Aspen, CO
• Shift Mobility Lab, Aspen, CO
• 2020 Census, State of Colorado
• Aspen Skiing Company Pandora’s Expansion, Aspen, CO
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE
25 years
EDUCATION
BA, Advertising,
University of Colorado,
Boulder
Select Master’s level courses in Psychology, University of Colorado, Denver
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 30
Fee Schedule
Requirement G
Principal - TDM Programs Sr Associate - TDM Planning Associate II - TDM Planning Associate Engineer I Principal Planner II
Engineering Designer I Project Accountant Alta's Hours Alta Expenses
AAllttaa''ss SSuubb TToottaall PM / Lead Engineer Traffic Engineer Transportation Engineer Hours SSGGMM Strategic Planning Outreach Execution Overall Project Management Hours MMaanniiffeesstt
Matthew
Kaufman
Jonathon(Jonny
) Rotheram Amy Johnson Chloe Ward
Brandon
Gonzalez Bryan Leyba Susana Zerbe Ashley Turner
Ashley Cline, PE Dan Cokley, PE, PTOE Eric Mahoney, EI
SSuubb TToottaall Rachel Brenneman
SSuubb TToottaall
2025 Hourly Rate*$255 $185 $185 $185 $255 $130 $130 $120 $180 $250 $140 $225 $200 $150
TTaasskk 11 PPrroojjeecctt MMaannaaggeemmeenntt 99 5566 2222 1188 00 00 00 1166 112211 77000000 $$2288,,997755 7766 00 1122 8888 $$1155,,336600 00 3388 1166 5544 $$1100,,000000 226633 $$5544,,333355
1.1 Project Management and Administration 5 20 10 16 51 7000 $15,745 48 48 $8,640 16 16 $2,400 115 $26,785
1.2 P roject Team Communication 2 16 8 10 36 $6,800 12 12 24 $3,840 26 26 $5,200 86 $15,840
1.3 Communication with the TAC 22 2200 44 88 34 $6,430 1166 16 $2,880 1122 12 $2,400 62 $11,710
TTaasskk 22 EExxiissttiinngg CCoonnddiittiioonnss AAnnaallyyssiiss 77 4411 3388 3377 22 6666 00 00 119911 00 $$3322,,333355 4400 2244 6666 113300 $$2222,,444400 00 00 00 00 $$00 332211 $$5544,,777755
2.1 Plan and Policy Review 8 6 2 12 28 $4,520 0 $0 0 $0 28 $4,520
2.2 Data Collection and Geospacial Analysis 2 4 8 4 14 32 $5,290 0 $0 0 $0 32 $5,290
2.3 Data Analysis 22 88 88 44 2244 46 $7,330 3322 1166 4422 90 $15,640 0 $0 136 $22,970
2.4 Bicycling and Walking Safety Audits (BWSA)22 55 44 1155 88 34 $5,990 0 $0 0 $0 34 $5,990
2.5 Multimodal Gap Analysis 11 44 44 1100 22 88 29 $5,135 88 88 2244 40 $6,800 0 $0 69 $11,935
2.6 Draft and Final Existing Conditions Report 1122 88 22 22 $4,070 0 $0 0 $0 22 $4,070
TTaasskk 33..00 SSttaakkeehhoollddeerr aanndd PPuubblliicc OOuuttrreeaacchh 00 88 1100 1144 00 44 00 00 3366 00 $$66,,444400 44 00 00 44 $$772200 3366 7700 00 110066 $$2222,,110000 114466 $$2299,,226600
3.1 Development of Engagement Plan 2 2 $370 0 $0 22 6 28 $6,150 30 $6,520
3.2 Stakeholder Interviews and Small Group Meetings & Associated Materials 2 4 4 10 $1,850 0 $0 30 30 $6,000 40 $7,850
3.3 Public Pop-up Events & Associated Materials 22 44 66 12 $2,220 0 $0 88 1188 26 $5,400 38 $7,620
3.4 Community E vent 22 22 44 44 12 $2,000 44 4 $720 66 1166 22 $4,550 38 $7,270
TTaasskk 44..00 PPrrooppoosseedd MMuullttiimmooddaall FFaacciilliittiieess NNeettwwoorrkk 66 3300 2222 3322 22 4488 4400 00 118800 00 $$2299,,002200 88 1166 2244 4488 $$88,,880000 00 00 00 00 $$00 222288 $$3377,,882200
4.1 Comprehensive Plan of Proposed Multimodal Facilities 2 16 14 12 2 34 12 92 $14,770 10 16 26 $4,740 0 $0 118 $19,510
4.2 Prioritization Matrix and Implementation 4 14 8 8 14 8 56 $9,430 6 8 14 $2,620 0 $0 70 $12,050
4.3 Cost E stimates 1122 2200 32 $4,820 88 8 $1,440 0 $0 40 $6,260
TTaasskk 55..00 DDrraafftt aanndd FFiinnaall RReeppoorrttss 33 3366 2200 1122 33 2288 1166 00 111188 00 $$1199,,883300 00 00 00 00 $$00 00 00 00 00 $$00 111188 $$1199,,883300
5.1 Draft R eport 2 20 12 8 2 20 16 80 $13,100 0 $0 0 $0 80 $13,100
5.2 Final Report 1 16 8 4 1 8 38 $6,730 0 $0 0 $0 38 $6,730
SSttaaffff HHoouurrss 2255 117711 111122 111133 77 114466 5566 1166 664466 112288 4400 110022 227700 3366 110088 1166 116600 11007766 $$119966,,002200
LLaabboorr TToottaall $$66,,337755 $$3311,,663355 $$2200,,772200 $$2200,,990055 $$11,,778855 $$1188,,998800 $$77,,228800 $$11,,992200 $$77,,000000 $$111166,,660000 $$2233,,004400 $$1100,,000000 $$1144,,228800 $$4477,,332200 $$88,,110000 $$2211,,660000 $$22,,440000 $$3322,,110000 $$119966,,002200
Subconsultant Markup 5%$$22,,336666 $$11,,660055 $$33,,997711
PPrroojjeecctt TToottaall $$66,,337755 $$3311,,663355 $$2200,,772200 $$2200,,990055 $$11,,778855 $$1188,,998800 $$77,,228800 $$11,,992200 $$111166,,660000 $$2233,,004400 $$1100,,000000 $$1144,,228800 $$4499,,668866 $$88,,110000 $$2211,,660000 $$22,,440000 $$3333,,770055 $$119999,,999911
PPhhaassee
AAllttaa PPllaannnniinngg ++ DDeessiiggnn,, IInncc..SSGGMM MMaanniiffeesstt CCoommmmuunniiccaattiioonnss
TToottaall TTaasskk
HHoouurrss
TToottaall
TTaasskk FFeeee
This proposed budget reflects the scope outlined in this proposal. The Alta team is flexible in our approach and looks
forward to working with the County to finalize the scope and budget to meet the needs of the County and project.
GENERAL NOTES:
• This fee proposal is valid for 90 days from the date submitted.
• Hours and staff assignments can be adjusted by the consultant as needed to
implement the tasks described during the course of the project.
• Hourly rates will be adjusted if work is continued into subsequent year(s).
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 31
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
Bill Rates - 2025
Labor Category RATE Typical Classifications Included in Rate
Labor Category 1 390.00$ Executive Principal
Labor Category 2 360.00$ Executive Principal
Labor Category 3 330.00$ Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 4 315.00$ Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 5 295.00$ Sr. Associate, Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 6 275.00$ Sr. Associate, Principal
Labor Category 7 255.00$ Leader, Sr. Associate, Principal
Labor Category 8 235.00$ Associate II, Sr. Associate, Director, Principal
Labor Category 9 220.00$ Associate I, Associate II, Sr. Associate
Labor Category 10 200.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II, Sr. Associate
Labor Category 11 185.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II
Labor Category 12 170.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II
Labor Category 13 150.00$ Level II, Level III, Associate I
Labor Category 14 140.00$ Level I, Level II, Level III
Labor Category 15 130.00$ Level I, Level II, Level III
Labor Category 16 120.00$ Level I, Level II
Labor Category 17 110.00$ Administration/Specialist
Labor Category 18 100.00$ Intern/Specialist
Rates are presented in US Dollars (US$) and are subject to change at any time.
Subconsultants and reimbursable expenses will be charged at cost + 5% markup.
Mileage will be charged at the provisional standard rate.
In-house reproductions will be charged as follows:
Color copies $0.65/ page
Black and white copies $0.20/page
24” x 36” large format plot $17.50/sheet
36” x 48” large format plot $32.50/sheet
Standard Rates
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
Bill Rates - 2025
Labor Category RATE Typical Classifications Included in Rate
Labor Category 1 390.00$ Executive Principal
Labor Category 2 360.00$ Executive Principal
Labor Category 3 330.00$ Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 4 315.00$ Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 5 295.00$ Sr. Associate, Principal, Executive Principal
Labor Category 6 275.00$ Sr. Associate, Principal
Labor Category 7 255.00$ Leader, Sr. Associate, Principal
Labor Category 8 235.00$ Associate II, Sr. Associate, Director, Principal
Labor Category 9 220.00$ Associate I, Associate II, Sr. Associate
Labor Category 10 200.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II, Sr. Associate
Labor Category 11 185.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II
Labor Category 12 170.00$ Level III, Associate I, Associate II
Labor Category 13 150.00$ Level II, Level III, Associate I
Labor Category 14 140.00$ Level I, Level II, Level III
Labor Category 15 130.00$ Level I, Level II, Level III
Labor Category 16 120.00$ Level I, Level II
Labor Category 17 110.00$ Administration/Specialist
Labor Category 18 100.00$ Intern/Specialist
Rates are presented in US Dollars (US$) and are subject to change at any time.
Subconsultants and reimbursable expenses will be charged at cost + 5% markup.
Mileage will be charged at the provisional standard rate.
In-house reproductions will be charged as follows:
Color copies $0.65/ page
Black and white copies $0.20/page
24” x 36” large format plot $17.50/sheet
36” x 48” large format plot $32.50/sheet
Strategic Planning Rate - $225
Implementation and Project Management Rate - $200
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.Aspen Airport Business Center (AABC) Multimodal Transportation Plan 32
Fee Schedule January 2025 Hourly Rate*
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER ........................................ $250
SENIOR ENGINEER III ......................................... $234
SENIOR ENGINEER II .......................................... $218
SENIOR ENGINEER I ........................................... $199
ENGINEER IV ......................................................... $180
ENGINEER III ......................................................... $165
ENGINEER II .......................................................... $140
ENGINEER I ........................................................... $121
SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER ........................... $179
PROJECT MANAGER ........................................... $166
PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST ........................................ $249
SENIOR SCIENTIST II ........................................... $213
SENIOR SCIENTIST I ............................................ $180
SCIENTIST III ......................................................... $150
SCIENTIST II .......................................................... $125
SCIENTIST I ........................................................... $108
SCIENTIST TECHNICIAN ...................................... $90
PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT .................................. $249
SENIOR CONSULTANT II..................................... $213
SENIOR CONSULTANT I...................................... $177
CONSULTANT III ................................................... $149
CONSULTANT II .................................................... $130
CONSULTANT I ..................................................... $116
TECHNICIAN III ...................................................... $100
TECHNICIAN II ......................................................... $85
TECHNICIAN I .......................................................... $72
CLERICAL ................................................................ $92
SENIOR CADD/GIS............................................... $166
CADD/GIS III .......................................................... $144
CADD/GIS II ........................................................... $130
CADD/GIS I ............................................................ $106
SENIOR CONSTRUCTION TECHNICIAN .......... $157
CONSTRUCTION TECHNICIAN II ...................... $144
CONSTRUCTION TECHNICIAN I ....................... $130
PRINCIPAL SURVEYOR ...................................... $199
LAND SURVEYOR III ............................................ $182
LAND SURVEYOR II ............................................. $164
LAND SURVEYOR I .............................................. $148
SURVEY TECHNICIAN III..................................... $132
SURVEY TECHNICIAN II...................................... $119
SURVEY TECHNICIAN I....................................... $107
FIELD SURVEY (1-Man Crew) ............................. $179
FIELD SURVEY (2-Man Crew) ............................. $238
SUE FIELD PROJECT MANAGER ...................... $216
SUE FIELD TECHNICIAN ..................................... $150
EXPERT TESTIMONY .......................................... $380
*There is 10% upcharge to the rates shown for electrical engineering and a 5% upcharge for water resources staff
REIMBURSABLES Equipment Rate
Vehicle Mileage .................................................................................. Current IRS Standard Mileage Rate
ATV / Snowmobile ................................................................................................................. $125.00/day
UTV ....................................................................................................................................... $250.00/day
Flow Tote .............................................................................................................................. $125.00/day
Reproduction
Black & White Plots ............................................................................................................... $ 5.50/sheet
Mylar Plots ........................................................................................................................... $19.00/sheet
Color Plots ........................................................................................................................... $30.00/sheet
Photocopies ........................................................................................................................... $0.25/page
Miscellaneous
10% will be added to all direct expenses, including FedEx, special delivery and courier charges, special
consultants, subcontractors, laboratory tests, airfare, lodging, meals, car rental, telephone, outside printing
expense, etc. Interest of 1.5% per month will be charged for invoices past 30 days.
Published 12/3/2024
bocc.con.031.25 Attachment B - Alta Proposal Documents
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 32EF1673-5A36-4E22-8AB6-1A22AE8CDE4E Status: Sent
Subject: Alta Planning + Design, Inc. | Pitkin County Contract 031.25 for Review and Signature
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 78 Signatures: 3 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 5 Initials: 1 Pitkin County Procurement
AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Disabled
Time Zone: (UTC-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)
530 East Main Street
Suite 203
Aspen, CO 81611
Procurement@PitkinCounty.com
IP Address: 216.147.121.177
Record Tracking
Status: Original
5/8/2025 2:47:24 PM
Holder: Pitkin County Procurement
Procurement@PitkinCounty.com
Location: DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Connie Baker
connie.baker@pitkincounty.com
Budget Director
Pitkin County
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 65.38.144.66
Sent: 5/8/2025 2:51:24 PM
Viewed: 5/8/2025 2:51:48 PM
Signed: 5/8/2025 2:52:56 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Andrew Knapp
andrew.knapp@pitkincounty.com
County Engineer
Pitkin County
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 65.38.144.66
Signed using mobile
Sent: 5/8/2025 2:52:59 PM
Viewed: 5/8/2025 3:28:32 PM
Signed: 5/8/2025 3:28:56 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Brian Pettet
Brian.Pettet@PitkinCounty.com
Public Works Director
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 65.38.144.66
Sent: 5/8/2025 3:28:59 PM
Viewed: 5/8/2025 3:30:56 PM
Signed: 5/8/2025 3:31:13 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 5/8/2025 3:30:56 PM
ID: a04ee7ef-9d4a-4270-a0cd-435b3aed9396
Company Name: Pitkin County, Colorado
Katie Mangle
katiemangle@altago.com
Vice President, as duly authorized
Alta Planning + Design
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 5/8/2025 3:31:17 PM
Resent: 5/12/2025 9:59:33 AM
Viewed: 5/12/2025 10:44:37 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 5/12/2025 10:44:37 AM
ID: 8554e6ff-0d24-48ef-bbb5-34e57b358b16
Company Name: Pitkin County, Colorado
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
County Manager Group
Signing Group: County Manager Group
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Pitkin County Procurement
procurement@pitkincounty.com
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Accounts Payable
AP@pitkincounty.com
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 5/8/2025 2:51:24 PM
Envelope Updated Security Checked 5/12/2025 9:59:33 AM
Envelope Updated Security Checked 5/12/2025 9:59:33 AM
Payment Events Status Timestamps
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE DISCLOSURE
From time to time, Pitkin County (we, us or Pitkin County) may be required by law to provide
you with certain written notices or disclosures. Described below are the terms and conditions for
providing to you such notices and disclosures electronically when we send you documents for
electronic signature.
Acknowledging your Access, Intent, and Consent to Receive and Sign Materials
Electronically
To confirm that you can access this information electronically, which will be similar to other
electronic notices and disclosures that we will provide to you, please verify that you were able to
read this electronic disclosure and that you also were able to print on paper or electronically save
this page for your future reference and access or that you were able to e-mail this disclosure and
consent to an address where you will be able to print on paper or save it for your future reference
and access. Further, if you consent to receive notices and disclosures exclusively in electronic
format on the terms and conditions described above, please let us know by clicking the 'I agree'
button below.
By checking the 'I Agree' box, I confirm that:
I am establishing my intent to be bound to the transaction, and indicating that I am fully
aware of the purpose for which the signature is being provided.
I can access and read this Electronic CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC RECEIPT OF
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE DISCLOSURES document; and
I can print on paper the disclosure or save or send the disclosure to a place where I can
print it, for future reference and access; and
Until or unless I notify Pitkin County as described above, I consent to receive from
exclusively through electronic means all notices, disclosures, authorizations,
acknowledgments, and other documents that are required to be provided or made
available to me by Pitkin County during the course of my relationship with you.
Signing Documents without a Pitkin County DocuSign Account:
Pitkin County may not require all document signers to be authorized users of the Pitkin County
DocuSign Account. Please read the information below carefully and thoroughly, and if you can
access this information electronically to your satisfaction and agree to these terms and
conditions, please confirm your agreement by clicking the 'I agree' button at the bottom of this
document. When you don't have a DocuSign account, you will be provided the opportunity to
agree to the Legal Disclosure each time you open an "envelope" for signing, at this time, you can
download and retain this disclosure. Pitkin County will forward completed documents that
you've reviewed, processed or signed via email. Should you require copies of these signed
documents (e.g., if they get deleted from your email account) you should request those
documents from Pitkin County under the Colorado Open Records Act by contacting the Pitkin
County custodian who sent you the document for signature.
Signing Documents with a Pitkin County DocuSign Account:
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure created on: 3/20/2020 3:28:13 PM
Parties agreed to: Brian Pettet, Katie Mangle
Please read the information below carefully and thoroughly, and if you can access this
information electronically to your satisfaction and agree to these terms and conditions, please
confirm your agreement by clicking the 'I agree' button at the bottom of this document.
Getting paper or electronic copies
At any time, you may request from us a paper or electronic copy of any record provided or made
available electronically to you by us. For such copies, as long as you are an authorized user of
the DocuSign system you will have the ability to download and print any documents we send to
you through your DocuSign user account for a limited period of time (usually 30 days) after such
documents are first sent to you. After such time, if you wish for us to send you paper or
electronic copies of any such documents from our office to you, you may be charged a per-page
fee. You may request delivery of such paper or electronic copies from us by following the
procedure described below.
Withdrawing your consent
If you are an authorized DocuSign Account holder, you can decide to receive notices and
disclosures from us electronically, you may at any time change your mind and tell us that
thereafter you want to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format. Described
below is the process for informing us of your decision to receive future notices and disclosure in
paper format and also how to withdraw your consent to receive notices and disclosures
electronically.
Consequences of changing your mind
If you elect to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format, it will slow the
speed at which we can complete certain steps in transactions with you and delivering services to
you because we will need first to send the required notices or disclosures to you in paper format,
and then wait until we receive back from you your acknowledgment of your receipt of such
paper notices or disclosures. To indicate to us that you are changing your mind, you must
withdraw your consent using the DocuSign 'Withdraw Consent' form on the signing page of your
DocuSign account. This will indicate to us that you have withdrawn your consent to receive
required notices and disclosures electronically from us and you will no longer be able to use your
DocuSign user account to receive required notices and consents electronically from us or to sign
electronically documents from us.
All notices and disclosures will be sent to you electronically
Unless you tell us otherwise in accordance with the procedures described herein, we will provide
electronically to you through your DocuSign user account all required notices, disclosures,
authorizations, acknowledgments, and other documents that are required to be provided or made
available to you during the course of our relationship with you. To reduce the chance of you
inadvertently not receiving any notice or disclosure, we prefer to provide all of the required
notices and disclosures to you by the same method and to the same address that you have given
us. Thus, you can receive all the disclosures and notices electronically or in paper format through
the paper mail delivery system. If you do not agree with this process, please let us know as
described below. Please also see the paragraph immediately above that describes the
consequences of your electing not to receive delivery of the notices and disclosures
electronically from us.
How to contact Pitkin County:
You may contact us to let us know of your changes as to how we may contact you electronically,
to request paper copies of certain information from us, and to withdraw your prior consent to
receive notices and disclosures electronically as follows:
To contact us by email send messages to Helpdesk@provelocity.com
To advise Pitkin County of your new e-mail address
To let us know of a change in your e-mail address where we should send notices and disclosures
electronically to you, you must send an email message to us at Helpdesk@provelocity.com and
in the body of such request you must state: your previous e-mail address, your new e-mail
address .
In addition, you must notify DocuSign, Inc to arrange for your new email address to be reflected
in your DocuSign account by following the process for changing e-mail in DocuSign.
To request paper or electronic copies from Pitkin County
To request delivery from us of paper or electronic copies of the notices and disclosures
previously provided by us to you electronically, you should request those documents from Pitkin
County under the Colorado Open Records Act by contacting the Pitkin County custodian who
sent you the document for signature.
To withdraw your consent with Pitkin County
To inform us that you no longer want to receive future notices and disclosures in electronic
format you may:
i. decline to sign a document from within your DocuSign account, and on the subsequent
page, select the check-box indicating you wish to withdraw your consent, or you may;
ii. send us an e-mail to Helpdesk@provelocity.com and in the body of such a request, you
must state your e-mail, full name, Postal Address, telephone number, and account
number.
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: A9A364F6-D548-4AD4-B55A-AFC67453CA57 Status: Completed
Subject: Alta Planning + Design, Inc. | Pitkin County Contract 031.25 R.1 for Review and Signature
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 83 Signatures: 3 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 5 Initials: 0 Pitkin County Procurement
AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Disabled
Time Zone: (UTC-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)
530 East Main Street
Suite 203
Aspen, CO 81611
Procurement@PitkinCounty.com
IP Address: 216.147.125.167
Record Tracking
Status: Original
5/13/2025 11:46:56 AM
Holder: Pitkin County Procurement
Procurement@PitkinCounty.com
Location: DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Katie Mangle
katiemangle@altago.com
Vice President, as duly authorized
Alta Planning + Design
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 75.164.201.56
Sent: 5/13/2025 11:51:43 AM
Viewed: 5/13/2025 12:32:37 PM
Signed: 5/13/2025 12:32:53 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 5/13/2025 12:32:37 PM
ID: 9c15bedf-ae02-410d-9930-ca0c0da6fee6
Company Name: Pitkin County, Colorado
Rich Englehart
rich.englehart@pitkincounty.com
Deputy County Manager
Pitkin County
Signing Group: County Manager Group
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 174.231.81.24
Sent: 5/13/2025 12:32:56 PM
Viewed: 5/13/2025 1:23:30 PM
Signed: 5/13/2025 1:24:15 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Pitkin County Procurement
procurement@pitkincounty.com
Procurement Specialist
Pitkin County
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 5/13/2025 1:24:18 PM
Resent: 5/13/2025 1:24:25 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Not Offered via Docusign
Accounts Payable
AP@pitkincounty.com
Accounts Payable
Pitkin County
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 5/13/2025 1:24:18 PM
Viewed: 5/13/2025 1:36:47 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Brian Pettet
Brian.Pettet@PitkinCounty.com
Public Works Director
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 5/13/2025 1:24:19 PM
Viewed: 5/13/2025 1:26:26 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 5/8/2025 3:30:56 PM
ID: a04ee7ef-9d4a-4270-a0cd-435b3aed9396
Company Name: Pitkin County, Colorado
Andrew Knapp
andrew.knapp@pitkincounty.com
County Engineer
Pitkin County
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 5/13/2025 1:24:20 PM
Viewed: 5/13/2025 3:50:47 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 5/13/2025 11:51:43 AM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 5/13/2025 1:23:30 PM
Signing Complete Security Checked 5/13/2025 1:24:15 PM
Completed Security Checked 5/13/2025 1:24:20 PM
Payment Events Status Timestamps
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE DISCLOSURE
From time to time, Pitkin County (we, us or Pitkin County) may be required by law to provide
you with certain written notices or disclosures. Described below are the terms and conditions for
providing to you such notices and disclosures electronically when we send you documents for
electronic signature.
Acknowledging your Access, Intent, and Consent to Receive and Sign Materials
Electronically
To confirm that you can access this information electronically, which will be similar to other
electronic notices and disclosures that we will provide to you, please verify that you were able to
read this electronic disclosure and that you also were able to print on paper or electronically save
this page for your future reference and access or that you were able to e-mail this disclosure and
consent to an address where you will be able to print on paper or save it for your future reference
and access. Further, if you consent to receive notices and disclosures exclusively in electronic
format on the terms and conditions described above, please let us know by clicking the 'I agree'
button below.
By checking the 'I Agree' box, I confirm that:
I am establishing my intent to be bound to the transaction, and indicating that I am fully
aware of the purpose for which the signature is being provided.
I can access and read this Electronic CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC RECEIPT OF
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE DISCLOSURES document; and
I can print on paper the disclosure or save or send the disclosure to a place where I can
print it, for future reference and access; and
Until or unless I notify Pitkin County as described above, I consent to receive from
exclusively through electronic means all notices, disclosures, authorizations,
acknowledgments, and other documents that are required to be provided or made
available to me by Pitkin County during the course of my relationship with you.
Signing Documents without a Pitkin County DocuSign Account:
Pitkin County may not require all document signers to be authorized users of the Pitkin County
DocuSign Account. Please read the information below carefully and thoroughly, and if you can
access this information electronically to your satisfaction and agree to these terms and
conditions, please confirm your agreement by clicking the 'I agree' button at the bottom of this
document. When you don't have a DocuSign account, you will be provided the opportunity to
agree to the Legal Disclosure each time you open an "envelope" for signing, at this time, you can
download and retain this disclosure. Pitkin County will forward completed documents that
you've reviewed, processed or signed via email. Should you require copies of these signed
documents (e.g., if they get deleted from your email account) you should request those
documents from Pitkin County under the Colorado Open Records Act by contacting the Pitkin
County custodian who sent you the document for signature.
Signing Documents with a Pitkin County DocuSign Account:
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure created on: 3/20/2020 3:28:13 PM
Parties agreed to: Katie Mangle, Brian Pettet
Please read the information below carefully and thoroughly, and if you can access this
information electronically to your satisfaction and agree to these terms and conditions, please
confirm your agreement by clicking the 'I agree' button at the bottom of this document.
Getting paper or electronic copies
At any time, you may request from us a paper or electronic copy of any record provided or made
available electronically to you by us. For such copies, as long as you are an authorized user of
the DocuSign system you will have the ability to download and print any documents we send to
you through your DocuSign user account for a limited period of time (usually 30 days) after such
documents are first sent to you. After such time, if you wish for us to send you paper or
electronic copies of any such documents from our office to you, you may be charged a per-page
fee. You may request delivery of such paper or electronic copies from us by following the
procedure described below.
Withdrawing your consent
If you are an authorized DocuSign Account holder, you can decide to receive notices and
disclosures from us electronically, you may at any time change your mind and tell us that
thereafter you want to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format. Described
below is the process for informing us of your decision to receive future notices and disclosure in
paper format and also how to withdraw your consent to receive notices and disclosures
electronically.
Consequences of changing your mind
If you elect to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format, it will slow the
speed at which we can complete certain steps in transactions with you and delivering services to
you because we will need first to send the required notices or disclosures to you in paper format,
and then wait until we receive back from you your acknowledgment of your receipt of such
paper notices or disclosures. To indicate to us that you are changing your mind, you must
withdraw your consent using the DocuSign 'Withdraw Consent' form on the signing page of your
DocuSign account. This will indicate to us that you have withdrawn your consent to receive
required notices and disclosures electronically from us and you will no longer be able to use your
DocuSign user account to receive required notices and consents electronically from us or to sign
electronically documents from us.
All notices and disclosures will be sent to you electronically
Unless you tell us otherwise in accordance with the procedures described herein, we will provide
electronically to you through your DocuSign user account all required notices, disclosures,
authorizations, acknowledgments, and other documents that are required to be provided or made
available to you during the course of our relationship with you. To reduce the chance of you
inadvertently not receiving any notice or disclosure, we prefer to provide all of the required
notices and disclosures to you by the same method and to the same address that you have given
us. Thus, you can receive all the disclosures and notices electronically or in paper format through
the paper mail delivery system. If you do not agree with this process, please let us know as
described below. Please also see the paragraph immediately above that describes the
consequences of your electing not to receive delivery of the notices and disclosures
electronically from us.
How to contact Pitkin County:
You may contact us to let us know of your changes as to how we may contact you electronically,
to request paper copies of certain information from us, and to withdraw your prior consent to
receive notices and disclosures electronically as follows:
To contact us by email send messages to Helpdesk@provelocity.com
To advise Pitkin County of your new e-mail address
To let us know of a change in your e-mail address where we should send notices and disclosures
electronically to you, you must send an email message to us at Helpdesk@provelocity.com and
in the body of such request you must state: your previous e-mail address, your new e-mail
address .
In addition, you must notify DocuSign, Inc to arrange for your new email address to be reflected
in your DocuSign account by following the process for changing e-mail in DocuSign.
To request paper or electronic copies from Pitkin County
To request delivery from us of paper or electronic copies of the notices and disclosures
previously provided by us to you electronically, you should request those documents from Pitkin
County under the Colorado Open Records Act by contacting the Pitkin County custodian who
sent you the document for signature.
To withdraw your consent with Pitkin County
To inform us that you no longer want to receive future notices and disclosures in electronic
format you may:
i. decline to sign a document from within your DocuSign account, and on the subsequent
page, select the check-box indicating you wish to withdraw your consent, or you may;
ii. send us an e-mail to Helpdesk@provelocity.com and in the body of such a request, you
must state your e-mail, full name, Postal Address, telephone number, and account
number.