HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.028.2000 Conpfete Either Section 1 or Section 11 k1AX 1,4M W, i -01*1!'F'i
RESOLUTION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS /91r7
Section]: Itraccordance with 39-1-113(1.5) C.R.S., the commissioners of Count;
authorize the asseasorto review petitions for abatement or refund and to settle by wr�ttt mutuaTagreement any such
pefitiorrftrrshirtwormd or refund in an amount of one thousand dollars or less per tract, parcel, or lot of iand or per
schednle of plsrsmta! property.
County Commission Resolution N
The Assessor and petitioner mutually agree to an assessed value of $ for
$$ for the year(s) 19_ and an abatement/refund of$
VESM TOTAL.TAX AMOUNT DOES NOT INCLUDE ACCRUED INTEREST, PENALTIES,
AND FEES IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR COUNTY TREASURER FOR FULL. PAYMENT
INFORMATION.
Petiteeta`e sirvaxw Ilnc Axxcnor'x Siyuaue Ihte
If SeeticwI is not ctmtplete and/or if petition is for more than $1,000, Section II must be completed.
Section 11: Assessors's recommendation:
Q approved - No protest filet in 19_ or 19 XX APPROVED FOR DIFFERENT THAN REQUESTED
Q approved in part $ ❑ denied for the following reason(s):
Note: If a protest was filed please attach copy of NOD.
ASSESSOR'S RECOMMENDATION
'\ SEE APPENDIX II
By:Asaeiesor 11 _ oap/Assassor y
WHEREAS, The County Commissioners of i - County,
State of o, at a duly and lawfully called regula4me ing held on th day
of A.D. at meeyrng the re sent t` ollowing
17e � ^G a
�( 1 `
notice of such meet}p 1 and an portunity to be present having been given to the taxpayer and the
Assessor of said Co ty and said Assessor (Hamel and taxpayer
(name) being present; and
WHEREAS, The said County Commissioners have carefully considered the within application, and
are fully advised in relation thereto,
NOW HE IT RESOLVED, That the Board CONCURS with the recommendation of
(concurs or does not concur)
the assessor and the petition be APPROVED , and an abatement refund BE ALLOWED
Japproved or denled) {be allowed or not be allowed)
g„t4n assessed valuation of $ 435,000 for $ 2,695.26 total tax for the year(s) 19 97.
`q4
` etittxrer withdrew request for 1996.
� AssiY Chairman of 90 rd cl unt Coroomr lsalonera
STATL O CO ORADO,
w tkr.
"County Of- f l2Z-
I, ? 7` /Y1-L S Count r1, d Ex-officio Clerk of the
Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of-
State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing order is truly copied from the records
of the prneeedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said
County, now in my office.
!�1,1,V/y1TNE53 WHEREOF, have here o s�q my hand and affix the seal of said County,
at
�. ,71z{ rh;z f y
;t..y a :-e— - A.i-;. r
ounly Clark
By Deputy
ACTION OF THE PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR
Denver, Colorado, 19--
The action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petition, is hereby
❑ approved;❑ approved in part $ ❑ denied for the following reason(s)
Secraiary, property'Fax Administrator
:Ike T
FORM 920(6643) ` PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES
( ICI ,U 1Cfl Must be filed in duplicate and ail questions must be answe d. 066t O `�3Q
Petitioners: Complete this side only.
Aspen Colorado, December 28 19 98
Lyry o.bum
Th The Homm. Board of Commissioners of Pitkin County
(Gentlemen: ORIGINAL
Q
The petition of William H. Plummer
whose mailing address is: 300 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 900
Chicago Illinois 60606
Ott,a Town state ZIP Code
SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AS LISTED ON TAX ROLL
c ..
273511202002/� Maroon Creek Club, Lot 2
R 014416
respectfully requests that the taxes assessed against the above property for the years A.D.
19 96 , 19 97, are erroneous, illegal, or due to error in valuation for the following reasons:
Describe specifically the circumstances surrounding the incorrect value or tax, Including owner's
estimate of value. (Attach additional sheets if necessary)
The owner purchased this property as one of the early sales in the Maroon Creek
subdivision, and overpaid at$1,360,000.00. The property was involved in a lawsuit
whereby the owner of land on the other side of Lot l obtained an access easement
across the subject Lot 2 for access and utilities, thereby damaging the value of
Lot 2. Subsequent sales of lots in this area of the Maroon Creek subdivision have
been at prices substantially below $1 ,200,000.00. Lot l was purchased as part of a
five lot purchase and was valued at $850,000.00 and is comparable to the subject
Property. The current assessed valuations of comparable lots, including Lots 1, 3 and
4 support a value of no more than $1,200,000.00 for the subject Property. The owner's
estimate of value is $1 ,200,000,00.
ASSESSOR'S CORRECTIONS TO THE PETITIONER'S ORIGINAL PETITION
SEE APPENDIX I
19 96 19 97
Value Tax Value Thx
Orig. $IT-548'-808:-G4 $10,970.12 $1 ,500,000.00 $13,476.30
Abate. $1 ,200,000.00 $ 8,776,10) $1 ,200,000.00 $10,781 .04
Bal. ($300,000.00) (2,194.02) ($300,000.00) (2,695.26)
Therefore the petitioner requests that the taxes may be abated or refunded in the sum of $ 41889.28
I declare, wider penalty of perjury in the second degree that this petition, together with any accompanying
exhibits or statements, has been examined by me and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief
is true, correct and complete.
c/o Krabacher Law Offices
William H. Plummer201 North Mill, Suite 201
Address Aspen, CO 81611
Illbnet
970-925-6300
By ere aytime phone number
B. Joseph KraNWher Attorney
Every petition for abatement or refund filed pursuant to section 39-10-114 shall be acted upon pursuant
to the provisions of this section by the board of county commissioners or the assessor, as appropriate, within
six months of the date of filing such petition. 39-1-113(1.7), C.R.S.