HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.029.2000 Corsi Bete Either Section 1 nr Section lI i;lJ w o? m- L U G
RESOLUTION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
d ,�', i 6 ysret4tMr`Mf In accordance with 39-1-1 13(1..5) C.R.S., the commissioners of Connly
authorize the assessor to review petitions for dhalenrent or refund and to set tTeTiy writG1 cttutual�tgrce�nent tuiy such
petition for abatement or refund in tin amount of one thousand dollars or less per tract, parcel, or lot of land or I),-,
schedule of personal property.
County Commission Resolution N ��_J
The Assessor and petitioner mutually agree to an assessed value of $ for
lotal lax for the year(s) 19__ and an nhateotent/rehmd of$ —`
PLEASii NOTE: TIIF TOTAL.TAX AMOUNT DOGS NOT INCUTDE ACCRUED INTERFST, 1'6NALTiliS,
AND FEES iF A I'll LiCAIILF, PF-FASF CONTACT YOUR COUNTY TREASURER 17011 FULL 11AYMEN r
1NF01M ATION.
1'edrLmci a SVspa,om b.b '-_—�_ A,muui s Slyutwe I,m ^—_ _---
it Section I is not complete andlor if petition is for more than $1,000, Section 11 nnist"tm completed.
Section TT: Assessors's recommendation:
Eapproved - No protest filed in 19_ or 19__;
❑ approved in part $ ❑ denied for the following reason(s):
Nate: if a protest was filed please attach copy of NOD.
ASSESSORS RECOMMENDATION
SEE APPENDIX II
Aaeesaor
nep,Assessor
WTIEREAS, The County Commissioners of 71' K/ County,
State ofgAtyrado, at a duly and lawfully called regular meeting held on the clay
of - _ ! _I A.D. .l/iIAM t which mee g there were p nt the following
n bers: , vc�£S,U£ prariG/Y01�c 6
notice of such t eeting and an opportunity to he present having been given to the taxpayer and tle
Assessor of said County and said Assessor ----�--d�q _ and taxpayer
(name)
^_ �& - (name) ` heing present-, and
----LlL�l�
W11FR1?AS, The said County Commissioners have carefully considered the within application, and
are hilly advised in relation thereto,
NOW BE IT RESOLVED, That the hoard CONCURS , with the recommendation of
(concurs or does not concwl
the assessor and the petition lie and an abatement refund RE ALLOWED
approved or denied) (ue a9ow ed or not he elicwedj
on in assessed valuation of $435.000 For $_2,655.67 total tax for the year(s) 19_98
' GttalrnlanBaarJ of CO my C,ammon '' .
S'I'ATE?'(IF COLORADO,
County o8
Cnut Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the
Baird of County Commissioners in and for Ilse Courtly of-
State
State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing orders truly copied from the records
of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said
County, now in my office.
)IN WITNESS N'VFIEREOF have here se my hand and affixed the seal of said County,
at L eft rt- _ this ��! day of _ -�6� l �� A.D.
/ �.oi,nty Clerk
By Dapuly -
ACTION OF TIIE PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR
Denver, Colorado, ^ 19—
The action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petition, is hereby
❑ approved;❑ apprnved in part .$ ❑ denied for the following reason(s)
_ -- pn;pdrty Tax A:Iminlslrzlnr
I'1 mim gVio IRB 83j PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES ORIGINAL
L Must be filed In duplicate and all questions must be answered.
i'elitioners: Complete this side only, RE'Ce<v
Aspen cnY or Ibnn Colorado, October 20 , �, I _94-DGT 2 7 199
y
To The Flortumirle Hoard of Commissioners of Pitkin _ Count
Cenileuten:
The petition of William H. P1tm>mes _
300 W. Wacker .Drive
whose mailing address Is: --
Chicago Illinois rnAnr. _Y
city or Town stets 21P Code
SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OIL PROPERTY AS LISTED ON TAX1tOLL
273511202002 Maroon Creek, Lot 2
R014416
respectfully requests that the taxes assessed against the above property for the years A.D.
19.98 , 19__, are erroneous, illegal, or due to error in valuation for the following reasons:
Describe specifically the circumstances surrounding the incorrect value or tax, including owner's
estimate of value. (Attach additional sheets if necessary)
The owner purchased this property as one of the early sales in the Maroon Creek subdivision,
.360.000.00. The property was involved in a lawsuit whereby the owner of
and overpaid at $1
land on the other side of Lot I obtained an access easement across the subject Lot 2 for access
and utilities. thereby damaging the value of Lot 2. Subsequent sales of lots in this area of the
Maroon (;reek subdivision have been at prices substantially below $1,200,000.00. Lot 1 was
purchased as part of a five lot purchase and was valued at$850,000.00 and is comparable to the
subject property. The current assessed valuations of comparable lots, including Lots 1, and 4
support a value of no more than $1,200,000.00 for the subject Property. The owner's estimate of
value is $1.200.000.00. Moreover, the 1999 assessment of the property was adjusted 20% on
6/1/99 tirom $175.000.00 to $140,000.00 as a result of the access easement.
19 98 19
Value `lax Value 11rx
Orig. $1 ,500,000.00 $13,278.38
300,000.00 2,655.67
Abate.
list. $1,200,000.00 10,622.7f
Therciitre the petitioner requests that the taxes may be abated or refunded irl the sum of $ 2,655,67
1 declare,under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this petition, together with any accompanying
exhibits or statements, has been examined by me and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief
is true, correct and complete. c/o Krabacher Law Offices
201 North Mill Street
William H. Plummer Suite 201 , Aspen, CO 81611
Address _ _
- Petltloner —~
t^ n
__ b I !� � Daytime phone number 970.925.6300
Agent ante
very peon for abatement or refiutd tiled pursuant to section 39-10-114 shall be acted upon pursuant
to the provisions of this section by the board of county commissioners or the assessor, as appropriate, within
six months of rite elate of filing such petition. 39-1-113(l.7), C.1t.S.