The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.res.072.2000 11111111111111111111111 HIM IN 11111111111111 IN IIII 443307 05/15/2000 10:52A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO,DENYING ONE METRO AREA RESIDENTIAL GMQS ALLOTMENT TO ROBERT AND GAEL STANGER Resolution No.02_2000 RECITALS 1. Robert and Gail Stanger,"Applicant," submitted an application to Pitkin County,to compete in the 1999 metro area residential GMQS competition for one allotment to construct a new free market residence. 2. The parcel is located on Smuggler Mountain Road,and is more specifically described in Exhibit A. 3. The parcel is zoned AFR-10 and contains approximately 16 acres. 4. On January 25,2000,the Growth Management Commission("Commission")held a duly noticed public hearing at which time evidence and testimony was presented with respect to the Stanger application, and scored the application based on the standards provided in Section 3-160-050(C)of the Land Use Code ("Code"). 5. The Commission gave the Stanger application a total score of 10.25 points,which did not meet the minimum threshold score of 12 points. In addition,the application did not meet the minimum threshold score of 3 points in any of the four growth management scoring categories. 6. The Applicant submitted an appeal of the Commission's scoring tothe Community Development Director, asserting that their due process rights were violated in the Commission's hearing. 7. The BOCC heard the Applicant's appeal at special meetings on February 29 and April It, 2000, and found that the Applicant's appeal raised doubts as to the fairness of the Growth Management Commission's scoring process and that the Applicant's due process rights were violated in the Commission's scoring of the application(refer to BOCC Resolution No.d 7//-2000). 8. The BOCC determined that the appropriate remedy in granting the appeal was to rescore the application,which occurred at a special meeting on April 11,2000. Two scoring rounds were conducted by the BOCC,as required by Section 4-60-065(B)(5)of the Code. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 III 1111111111111 ResolutionNo.Qff-2000 443307 05/15/2000 10:52A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI Page 2 2 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 9. The BOCC gave the Stanger application a total score of 13 points,which meets the minimum threshold score of 12 points. However,the application did not meet the minimum threshold score of 3 points in one of the four growth management scoring categories as required by Section 4-60-065(B)(7)of the Code, and,therefore, is not eligible to receive a GMQS allotment. The tally of the BOCC's scores is attached as Exhibit B. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the BOCC that it does hereby deny one metro area GMQS allotment to the Stanger residence. DENIED on the 11`h day of April,2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITK�IN��C��OUNTTY,COLORADO ATTEST: Shellie Roy 14arper,C air Date 'j /% ep yn e R. Dean Cl k to the BOCC APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: I �w CK John Ely, ouben, T!9t Oc) County ey Community Development Director Case#P147-99 PID 4273707400041/042 I Mill IIIIIIIIIII Mill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN 443307 05/25/2000 10:52A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 3 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO EXHIBIT A PARCEL A: RESULT, U.S .M.S . NO. 6044, AS DESCRIBED IN PATENT RECORDED IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 225 . PARCEL B : CONTRABAND, U.S .M.S . NO. 4471, AS DESCRIBED IN PATENT RECORDED IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 187 . iQ,'. 072-2,aoo I I'�III "III 'llll� IIIII "II" II'I I'I"! !II 'llll 'I'I I"I 443307 05/15/2000 10:52A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 4 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO BOCC RESCORING— STANGER RESIDENCE 1999 METRO RESIDENTIAL GMQS Patti Leslie Shellie Mick Dorothea Total Average ROUND 1 Clapper Lamont Harper Ireland Farris —Final Score Revitalizing the Permanent 3 3 4 3 4 17 3.4 Community Providing Transportation 3 4 4 1 4 16 3.2 Alternatives Promoting Environmentally 2 2 3 2 4 13 2.6 Sustainable Development Maintaining Design Quality, 1 1 3 3 4 12 2.4 Historic Compatibility and Community Character Patti Leslie Shellie Mick Dorothea Total Average ROUND 1 Clapper Lamont Harper Ireland Farris —Final Score Revitalizing the Permanent 3 3 4 3 5 18 3.6 Community Providing Transportation 3 4 4 2 5 18 3.6 Alternatives Promoting Environmentally 3 2 4 1 5 15 3.0 Sustainable Development Maintaining Design Quality, 1 1 4 3 5 14 2.8 Historic Compatibility and Community Character