Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.126.2000 Compplete Either Section I or Section 11 RESOLU11 N OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Section 1: In accordance with 39-1-113(1.5) C.R.S., the commissioners of County authorize the assessor to review petitions for abatement or refund and to settle by written mutual ngreemenl any such petition for abatement or refund in an amount of one thousand dollars or less per tract, parcel, or lot of land or per schedule of personal property. County Commission Resolution N The Assessor and petitioner mutually agree to an assessed value of $ for $ total tax for the year(s) 19_ and an abatement/refund of$ PLEASE NOTE: THE TOTAL TAX AMOUNT DOES NOT INCLUDE ACCRUED INTEREST, PENALTIES, AND FEES IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR COUNTY TREASURER FOR FULL PAYh1ENT INFORMATION. Peririmcr',Sipurun: Ihie M,crwr r Sipuiurt 1h� If Section I is not complete and/or if petition is for more than $1,000, Section II must he completed. Section IL• Assessors's recommendation: XXKapproved - No protest filed in 19 $8 or 19__ ❑ approved in part $ ❑ denied for the following reason(s): Note: If a protest was filed please attach copy of NOD. ASSESSOR'S RECOMMENDATION SEE APPENDIX II Assessor 1 Dep. Assessor WHEREAS, The Counttissioners of r GZC County, S to o Colorado, t a duly and lawfully.called regular meeting held on the day of ` "1 A.D. at w tic meeting r w re Dresent the following members: 4 �r notice of such meeting and an opportunity to b present- yjn ' been given to the taxpayer and the Assessor of said County and said Assessor ! and taxpayer (name) being present; and (name) WHEREAS, The said County Commissioners have carefully considered the within application, and are fully advised in relation thereto, NOW BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board (concur or Ls not with the recommendation of concur) the assessor and the petition be APPROVED and an abatement refund BE ATj.QWED t (appimed or denied) (De aewwd a rmt De rsorrod) on an assessed valuation of $ 23.170 for $ 250.91 total tax for the year(s) 19-8_. ��r .1. ,., $,Q Chairman of Board of C junly Co issioners F u TE,O COLORADO, Cr SS. �y ,6,,1; C-. /Z L4-7-r YL f--S . Cuun lerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of /)":iKil / �L State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing order iy t ly copied from the records of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said 1/7,0!V sue County, now in my office. IN)WITNESS 1VIIEREOF„I, have hercurlto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at /tw/It.- , this day of Lrc Ll A.D. County k/ 13y Deputy ACTION OF THE PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR Denver, Colorado, 19 . The action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petition, is hereby ❑ approved;❑ approved in part $ ❑ denied for the following reasons) Secretary Property Tax Admmtstrator FORM 920(66-93) I `}�Just PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES "- �� be filed In duplicate and all questions must be answe ,r �� Petitioners:�ebmplete this side only. Be li A� FEB 2 4 20 00 t &Q o&-KS V•1 c Colorado, 02- -0202 -y i o� a co To The Honorable Board of Commissioners of �_"r n) County Gentlemen: ORIGINAL The petition of cr✓V 0 W/J'l�SS ��A(3nc�n� whose mailing address is: P. O Eo x / oAp t / NQW&7&-S-5 �% �1.AGv �nRi4Do //n0� City w Tom —' State Zip Coft SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION Or PROPERTY AS LISTED -OtN TAX ROLL F0V '7�CY� (.011"IMC� C f A( WoNR L FA to,�yt�t�.t respectfully requests that the taxes assessed against the above property for the years A.D. 19 Ye-, 19—, are erroneous, illegal, or due to error in valuation for (he following reasons: Describe specifically the circumstances surrounding the incorrect value or tax, including owner's estimate of value. (Attach additional sheets if necessary) R j; qN T,ax,-N ,9ss 3,J i© ao 132us4 c-FFY- ' -6" sttoL(d hAlvLs- J5L;L9A) C) -7 ,u0T— 009 J�-S 7-41 GT ASSESSOR'S CORRECTIONS TO PETITIONER'S ORIGINAL PETITION----- SEEAPPENDIX I 19 1 .__ 19 Value Tax Value 'Ihx Orig. ;t 3/ 70`t:'o 8 33 g°Z Abate. a�/ 0O0 5�a,gr Bal. d so 9 Therefore the petitioner requests that the taxes may be abated or refunded in the sum of .DCZ50 I declare, under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this petition, together with any accompanying exhibits or statements, has been examined by me and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief is true, correct and complete. c /00. 8G;t< 60198 cfiUO(,r//rl9s5 Ji�9i3��� Address c/NDurn-+sS Y.//ac .y �m �,/ Petitioner � By /71.��1G�E -ffl/S/�o/���t't fV/1 0 Daytime phone number 97y-g�7'33a9 �� ,V—� D.t. Every petition for b them'ent o or nd filed pursuant to section 39-10-114 shall be acted upon pursuant to the provisions of this section by the board of county commissioners or the assessor, as appropriate, within six months of the date of filing such petition. 39-1-113(l.7), C.R.S. HOECXECS-O,n ar,CO—WWI 46 APPENDIX I CORRECTIONS MADE BY THE ASSESSOR TO THE PETITIONER'S ORIGINAL PETITION SCHEDULE # P004862 TAX YEAR: 1998 ASSESSED VALUE TAX AMOUNT ORIG: $ 23,170 $ 833.82 ABATE N/A 250.91 BAL: $ 23,170 $ 582.91 CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, DUE TO THE FACT THAT: According to the petitioner, this property was in the wrong tax district (#004) during 1998, where the mill levy was 37.566, and should have been in tax district#007 where the mill levy was 25.158 for 1998. The amounts that the petitioner has used are correct, except for the fact that the petitioner has reversed the "abate" & "balance" amounts. This appendix corrects all of these errors, and shows the correct amounts based on the petitioner's request. APPENDIX I I RECOMMENDATION MADE BY THE ASSESSOR SCHEDULE # P4892 DENIAL XXXX APPROVED AS SUBMITTED ABATEMENT / REFUND DIFFERENT THAN REQUESTED TAX YEAR: 1998 ASSESSED VALUE TAX AMOUNT ORIG.- $ 23,170 $ 833.82 ABATE: N/A 250.91 BAL: $ 23,170 $ 582.91 THE BASIS OF THE RECOMMENDATION IS: The Assessor erroneously assigned the subject property to tax district#004, with a mill levy of 35.987, for the 1998 tax year. The correct tax district should have been #007, with a mill levy of 25.158 for the 1998 tax year. Therefore, this abatement should be approved to correct the difference in the tax amount, due to the difference in the mill levies of the two tax districts.