The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.res.133.2000 Complete Either Section I or Section II RESOLUTION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Section L In accordance with 39-1-1 l3(l.5) C.R.S., the commissioners of L/ 4 7 County authorize the assessor to review petitions for abatement or refund and to settle by wniten mutual agreement any such petition for abatement or refund in an amount of one thousand dollars or less per tract, parcel, or lot of land or per schedule of personal property. County Commission Resolution # The Assessor and petitioner mutually agree to an assessed value of $ for $ total tax for the year(s) 19_ and an abatement/refund of$ PLEASE NOTE: THE TOTAL TAX AMOUNT DOES NOT INCLUDE ACCRUED INTEREST, PENALTIES, AND FEES IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR COUNTY TREASURER FOR FULL PAYMENT INFORMATION. petat.r',Sigurure I><u Mssrrer r Siyuiurz Urc If Section I is not complete and/or if petition is for more than $1,000, Section II roust he ahnipletr�. Section 11: Assessors's recommendation: ❑ approved - No protest filed in 19 99 or 19__ Elvapproved in part $ ❑ denied for the following reason(s): Note: If a protest was filed please attach copy of NOD. ASSESSOR'S RECOMMENDATION r SEE APPENDIX H B Assessor Dep. Assessor W EAS, The County Commissioners of yL County, State of Col cad at a duly and lawfully called regular meeting held on the day of A.D. 9,: � 7, a which m ing here were pr t the Mowing members: �` � L i it notice of such meeting and an opportunity to 11 resent have tg been given to the laapayer and the Assessor of said County rnnd said Assessor 2S zL and taxpayer enamel being present; and WHEREAS, The said County Commissioners have carefully considered the within application, and are fully advised in relation thereto; NOW BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board CONCURS with the recornniendation of (concum or does not concur) ,assessor and the petition be APPROVED and an abatement refund BE ALLOWED Y Y<TKI'"'"�btl (approved or denied) Iw aemwd a nor be allowed) 33 Q •3.essed valuation of $73,990 for $ 218,45 total tax for the year(s) 1922. ,.n.. Chairman of Board oLpunty mmissioners TATF�,LLORADO , SS. County of- 00 dyy 16 County rk>/ d. Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Cou Commissioner in and f r the? our,, of t Cz4l State of Color o, do hereby c reify that the above and foregoing order iS rrJ ly r�opied from the records of the procee rags of the Board of County Commissioners for said a/1.1i County, now in my office. $ ` TNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto s t n y hand and affixed the seal of said County, at this St day of A.D.ittl I i sea : 1" c � County rk r,By,� Deputy ACTION OF THE PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR Denver, Colorado, 19 . The action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petitinn, is hereby ❑ approved;❑ approved in part $ ❑ denied for the fallowing rrason(s) Secretary Property Tax Administrator FORM a20(6&93) C T PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES Must be filed In duplicate and all questions must be answered. Pedtione -. Complete/ this side only. OW,41 5.r b/1' , Colorado, CRY w Town To The Honorable Board of Commissioners of � �^� County Gentlemen: The petition of whose mailing address is: s- Gry w Town ' slate Zip co" SCHEDULE NUMBER DEES'CRIPTIONN/OF PROPERTY AS LISTED ON TAX ROLL MAP i 5 U[Jl respectfully requests that the taxes assessed against the above property for the years A.D. 19 , 19_, are erroneous, illegal, or due to error in valuation for the following reasons: Describe specifically the circumstances surrounding the incorrect value or tax, including owner's estimate of value. (Attach additional sheets if necessary) ASSESSOR'S CORRECTIONS TO PETITIONER'S ORIGINAL PETITION----- SEEAPPENDIX 1 19 9q 19 Value Tax Value 11tx Orig. 73 11 to 2779. S& Abate. !. l /0 Bal. 6t ovo Lyo Z ?/ 2-0 Therefore the petitioner requests that the taxes may be abated or refunded in the sum of $ 37 I declare,under penalty of pequry in the second degree that this petition, together with any accomp- .ying exhibits or statements, has been examined by me and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief is true, correct and complete. Address PeNNonor By Daytime phone number Agent Dots Every petition for abatement or refund filed pursuant to section 39-10-114 shall be acted upon pursuant to the provisions of this section by the board of county commissioners or the assessor, as appropriate, within six months of the date of filing such petition. 39-1-113(l.7), C.R.S. HOECKEI'S dm.a.,CO-WWI4S APPENDIX I CORRECTIONS MADE BY THE ASSESSOR TO THE PETITIONER'S ORIGINAL PETITION SCHEDULE # 11849 TAX YEAR: 1999 ASSESSED VALUE TAX AMOUNT ORIG: $ 73,990 $ 2,779.50 ABATE 11,170 419.61 BAL: $ 62,820 $ 2,359.89 CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, DUE TO THE FACT THAT: Based on the petitioner's requested actual value of$645,000, the "abate" & "balance assessed values and tax amounts are incorrect. This appendix corrects all of these errors, and shows the correct amounts based on the petitioner's request. APPENDIX II RECOMMENDATION MADE BY THE ASSESSOR SCHEDULE # 11849 DENIAL APPROVED AS SUBMITTED XXXX ABATEMENT / REFUND DIFFERENT THAN REQUESTED TAX YEAR: 1999 ASSESSED VALUE TAX AMOUNT ORIG: $ 73,990 $ 2,779.50 ABATE: 5,810 218.25 BAL: $ 68,180 $ 2,561.25 THE BASIS OF THE RECOMMENDATION IS: The Assessor is recommending an adjusted actual value of $700,000, with an assessed value of$68,180. The value is higher that the petitioner is requesting, which is an actual value of$645,000, with an assessed value of $62,820. The Assessor is recommending the different value based on the following reasons: 1) Sale of the subject property, in June of 1999, was never listed on the open market, The realtor involved in the transaction is an acquaintance of the seller and did not take a sales commission. Without reasonable exposure in a competitive market, the Assessor feels that the unit sold for under market value, and is therefore considered to be an unqualified sale. 2) The fee appraisal of the subject that was submitted with the abatement petition, uses comparable sale after June 30, 1998. This is out of the time frame for sales when the Assessor is considering values for 1999. 3) The comparable sales that were submitted in the fee appraisal are no the most appropriate to the subject property, as shown in the attached data grid. This grid shows three sales that took place prior to June 30, 1998, which is within the time frame that the Assessor used to consider values for 1999. Two of the comparable sales shown on this data grid are in the same complex as the subject property. The adjustments made between these two comparable properties and the subject property suggest a market value of $700,000. THE PETITIONER HAS SIGNED A STIPULATION FORM, AGREEING TO THE ABOVE RECOMMENDATION—SEE ATTACHED.