Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.246314300012DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL.OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (llxl'n '~: Thomas Subdivision General Submission pLNp,;~ „_711°hNi4Ft: .n'4 ~(' ~.. _ i.. ~N. _. .....'. ~_~s IIIIOIYI~~i .; . OV`k+1~: Thomas, Charles E ' J~TF'~ O($f1; FEESpI.lE:~- FEESRG'wp~`- ALLOCATEDHOt1RS:~- %OVER: acr:~caQei c FIEF~"~ BY~~ ' , DuE:r" IS}AT'G- ,F~V. ='FFI,,. ' ::'"NO'f1Or„tx pA1'EOFP4NALACTIt7N: ~~ BOCYORmso: No No 8OCCOrd: ~_.....___ HROOFF: ~r"r` ,. . ,.,. ~. ~ :: ~: ~ . :. Y ,, , ~.... ,. . ~ F~1.A'L.f..~i~3Fp~.--.-- ~+'f'{BKPt3g 811 P79 #234766 ADMIN INpEX: ~-emu VFt'OVALQATE:~~ yREl4~RES:~~- CASE'fYF. Subdivision General Submission CASE TYRE: CASE TYP2: CASE 7YP&: Ct+SE TY~3: CASE TYP7: CASETYAA: pale Scanrle~l: 7/16107 Fite Lacadion: FF Box 96 .. ,.. << .. ~ .: .~... .....~ a. :~ ..~~. :: ~.. .~ _ . _ ,p 16 s~ Asper/P~~~i~~ i~~~~ ~~~ic~ ~~. 130 so;a~~~a_ ~alen~ street aspen;`co~aradow:;81611_ --~ per November 15, 1978 Mr. Charles Thomas Box 213 Carbondale, CO 81623 Dear 14r. Thomas: We have reviewed the material which. you mailed to us regarding sub- division in Section 24 & 25 and have found it to be substantially incomplete. The first step in the process for subdivision is a "Pre-application conference" with the Planning staff and .gives us an opportunity to go over all necessary material and information to help you make a complete application. Please call for an appointment with me (925-2020 ext. 223) at your convenience. S cerely, Q~~.~~ Richard Grice Assistant Planner RG/sr ~, r a* s -, APPENDIX B PITKIN COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER Section/Parcel q LAND USE APPLICATION FORM DATE SUBMITTED /~ 1s~r.~ ~4 p QaC i2~2f~ l )~T'~?if1 ~~SQ~ ~ 1> 0 ~~~~ TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: NAME !'~7,Y'leS 'i+'. 'i hOYB?.S ADDRESS r~ox l3 f°-rbrnr'~~'e Colo - PHONE 96'5 ~6t~8 NAME OF PROJECT 4tn^;s. ^r 7e'LY1F' T""'a ri0 name PROJECT LOCATION: (On attached sheet, locate on zoning map, showing boundaries of any natural hazard and resource areas, any other special regulatory districts, Section 5, Land Use Code; and locate on appropriate CSU/ERA Maps any areas not covered by the above.) TOTAL AREA ~.~{_o~, q~,.~,~ ~''~aSt ~ h^.lf Of Ceotion ti~enty Four d~ 25 Lives~oek urazein~_ t~ S~~ ;ection 24 -$-~~8 EXISTING USE (S) (-~,~~ ~~z ~~ 24 - s-as S ?5 ~~-?rs-3-s~- PROPOSED usE(s) Selling to whom ever ~v~~n-ts to buy. ~~:~is land is (approximate square Pre p~1r;JOSe i.n Seliiri~ 1S tJ .NrOteCt t~"ie rest ~£ footage for each) r,. .: ---~ PRESENT ZONING OF SITE Gr?Zeln'~ 1RriCZ (~~d~~~~ ~ ~ tf(5~ ~D'~.~ DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE PROPOSAL `IYt.e "~°uyerS O'P th1S la~ld CO)~e . . :.. ;. y _ x,. the Buyer for 4Q Acres. e, one horse site is their pl",n ~., TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING OFFICE TYPE OF APPLICATION:. 8 REZONING ~ SUBDIVISION P.U.D. EXEMPTION SPECIAL REVIEW 35-acre + SUBDIVISION BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW REVIEW PHASE: PRE-APPLICATION _ GENERAL SUBMISSION DETAILED SUBMISSION FINAL PLAT. DATE COMPLETED P.C. ACTION DATE BOARD ACTION DATE P.C. ACTION DATE BOARD ACTION DATE BOARD ACTION DATE . ~ ... ._: .. .,,. .:..~ .. ~„ -r.:i, .~:~, o.~ ~:... .,ti v4=+...e^, ae.~.t,~,~v .ase .~ x. )*r v, s. a.+n.:.~. ~+° ^ Appendix B '` PITKIN COUNTY LAND USE APPLICATION FORM ~" 1. 2. 3. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS REQUIRED BY REVIEW PHASE Directions: Any applicant for a development requiring apermit under this code shall be responsible for showing conformance with any applicable policies of Section 2 as listed below. The applicant shall submit those requirements necessary to show conformance with these policies and the related general regulations of Section 5. Upon submission of the applica- tion and all submission contents, the Planning Office shall distribute same to appropriate referral agencies which shall indicate its certifica- tion or non-certification of the proposal as being in conformance with policies and as satisfying submission requirements and review guidelines of relevant general regulations. Referral agencies shall also indicate whether further study in a later review phase is required and any further recommendations or conditions, attaching comments and returning same to the Planning Office. OCAL REVIEW- CERTIFICATION CONDITION STUDY REQUIRED POLICY FACTOR NG STAFF YES NO AND INITIALS DATE RECOMMEND. TIONS PA GS DS FP* Not inconsistant Planning with Master Pla Office - - - - Rate of Growth - - Hazard & Resourc Planning Areas Office Geologic Hazards Floodplains Riparian Areas Wildlife Wildfire Radiation Soils/Erosion County Ex- tension Agent Extractable (Planning - - Resources Ii Office Mineral Vegetable Other i II 3 ~- •~ rri = rre-rippiicacion ua = lletalleQ Jllbm1551.On GS = General Submission FP = Final Plat Appendix B Y PITKIN COUNTY LAND USE APPLICATION FORM STUDY REQUIRED POLICY FACTOR LOCAL REVIEW- CERTIFICATION CONDITIONS ING STAFF YES NO AND INITIALS DATE RECOMMENDA- TIONS PA GS DS FP 11. Roads/Trails De- County sign & Construe- Engineer tion Impact on Road system Maintenance pro- visions 12. Drainage County Engineer 13. Impact on Trans- County pvrtation Engineer 14. Impact on Public Planning Office Facilities/ Services Solid Waste County Engin- Disposal & eer Collection Fire & Police Sheriff/ Protection, Fire Response District Service Sanitary Land County Engin- fills eer Flospital Hosptial Capacity Board Library Sub- Library station Site Board Post Office Postal- Substation Service Site July 10, 1980 The application is for the purposes of a one-time i lot split (exempt from growth management) and for an exemption from the definition of a subdivision of ' previously developed lands as provided for in ' Article 4-2.2 a (6) of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. The property owned by the applicant, Charles E. Thomas, consists of two separate tracts containing a total o£ approximately 853 acres. There I are, at present, three single family homes on the property, all with in 500 feet of each other. The lot split, if-approved, would create another single family unit in the same area. The application, i£ approved, would provide for a ' covenant against further development of approximately 120 acres surrounding Lewis Lake, which provides for just over 30 acres per unit to accomodate the RS-3.0 zoning of the property. ', The flood plain line as shown on the plat assumes a water level 10 feet higher than that shown on 'the i U. S. G. S. quadrangle sheet. The code calls for i 5 feet above high water level, so l0 feet seems more 'than reasonable in this case. The existing and proposed development is shown as an area"of moderate visual vulnerability on the C. S. U. i hazard maps. No other hazards appear. The single family dwelling for which exemption--is ~ sought has been in place since 1969, at which"time no subdivision regulations were in effect and the area was unzoned. The existing water supply is an improved spring. ,' It is proposed, however, that wells be drilled on both the exempted and the subdivided tracts. Sewage disposal would be site specific engineered systems. i MEMORANDUM T0: Colorado Geologic Survey Colorado Water Conservation Board Pat Dobie, County Engineer Bob Nelson, Environmental Health Holy Cross Electric Association FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office RE: Thomas Lot Split - General Submission DATE: July 21, 1980 The attached application requests approval for a lot split for a parcel located in the Crystal River Valley, submitted by Charles E. Thomas.. This item is scheduled to come before the Pitkn County Planning and Zoning Commission on September 3, 1980; therefore, may I please have your written comments no later than August 21, 1980? Thank you. pitkin county 506 east main street aspen, Colorado 8'16'1'1 ME MO']zAN D'UM TO: Richard Grice, Planning Office FROM: Patrick Dobie, County Engineer ~i DATE: August 20, 1980 \\\ RE: Thomas Lot Split The application at hand is a request to transfer density from an 800. acre tract to ,a 53 acre tract near the Crystal River. The question of density transfer is unresolved as far as I can determine and remains a planning con- sideration rather than`an engineering matter. However, with respect to engineering considerations, if the intension of the applicant is to further pursue this approval and develop the river acreage along the allowable density of the upper acreage, then the criteria for evaluating the carrying capacity of this land should be significantly sharper than what is presented. In other words, under current .zoning the allowable build- out is approximately 25 units of which 3 presently exist. The roads, utilities, geologic considerations £or evaluating this impacts should be considered rather than allowing a piecemeal development to occur: with respect to the application at hand the following information is needed: Proof of legal access from the .highway; A joint use and maintenance agreemment for the common facilities; Dedication of utility easements and recreational use easement for the Crystal River and Lewis Lake; An agreement to join and support improvements districts which exist or clay be proposed for this area. ;, ~ ~~ RICHARD q. LAMM GOVERNOR COLORAO SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING -13'13 SHERMAN-STREET DENVER,COLORAD080203 PHONE (3031839-2611 August 5,'7980 Mr. Richard Grice Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Mr. Grice: RE: THOMAS LOT SPLIT JOHN W. ROLD Director We have reviewed the data submitted regarding this application and the,. general and engineering geology of the area and, with the exception of flooding, there appear. to be no geologic reasons why this application should not. be approved. Lot 1 in sec. 22 could very well lie within the 100-year flood limit of the Crystal River. This matter should be resolved. by a competent hydrologist or hydrologic engineer prior to subdivisioh dnd certaihly before thin lot is allowed to be sold.. JLH/gp cc: LUG Yours truly, ~~~~~~- Jeffre L. yn Engineering Geologist GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST ...KEY TO THE FUTURE ~ ~ ~ ~z z ~ ~- _- ° CF ~ 2 h r i c -. z c .T.'~~ , .. _~ _ . - `.. 'ilTY i1AP j ' v_ C.Z. ~^.3LSTi Pa Jf' Bcx i>3G - ts,.en C., .=io Sts;t 3;3 3 ~Ec~ fr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s .°. Y ~e ~"` a r"§. ~~ ~ t .~" zv-n °rr :;;~ ^ .. axe.- .~.. '~ t s - x -• - - s _ t ~ _ ~-CC_ __~_ ti,• .~~1 B Va ~Ca.' .R ~h = c N f. J _ ~flJ >:rs I Z_c = 'i' __... _ -b 1'r ,fix' {f _ "~ ?~ r n Ki] ~~2b ~X~'~K°i- ,f.'YV. ra c ~t .5..2 - Q r. h. d~ ~i - a u =~~e i^c ii ~ ~ _ -._~:~ /: ." , 3 I ~y:~3 S~~ ~'fw: ry7 .x ii ~' -.P -. v: / d' x':~:5 < ~ d '~° rv p ~_e~ l A t -:.r .x 7. ~ ~"rte r°x~-..n l1l:~ `9 ~. ~~x :-.c.; rq "'`sir-._a.~~y„. ~><_=°~ _N J V w 9~' ~.E ~2 ~ ~. _Y ~ ~.~.T Rn `LC- 3 y'c ~3 F G Svxza' - ;ar.-gars _ _- _ °"°..°°-`-=-=-m_.~ `-_-~~ ~.