The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.82.07 • Paul Krausch moved that the following be adopted: BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTA2ENT OF THE COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION N0 . 3 2 - 7 Robert Nicols~, Lot R1O1, Starwood 16 WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado; and, WHEREA:~, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the Hower to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28--118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjorninq property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant's request for a 90' frontyard setback variance for construction of a single family residence Additional conditions or restrictions: Pending approval from the Starwood Homeowners Association Architectural Committee WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. Kandi Shaf f ranseconded the adoption of the foregoing Resolution. The roll having been called, the vote was as follows: Clark Smyth - yes T~andi Shaffran - yes Paul Krausch - yes Bob Throm - yes Evan ~~ull - yes The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: Ap ri 1 2 7, 1982 The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado Attest: ,, - `, ,;_~ ~ Chairman ,,, „,,,~ ~, . ..: Secr tary ' '" -' APP• T 0 BOARD OF ADJUSTIIEPlT County of Pitkin Pate _~z ri 1 12 19 82 c/o Applicant Robert Nicols Address c/o Owner Susan Seel Address Location of Property Lot R 101, Starwood 16, Pitk~ Case ~ ~sZ- ~ Herbert S. Kl~i~~ 201 N. Mill, Aspen, CO 81611 Albert Kern 430 E. H~~.man, Aspen, CO 81611 1 County, Colorado - (Attached) Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made a part of this Case No. The Board may return this application if it does not contain all the facts in question. Applicant's description of proposed variance showing justification: _ Applicant requests a front yard setback variance from the 100' setback required by the AF-1 zone designation to 10' as necessary to mitigate topographic hardships. The parcel is very steep and has only one area suitable for building. The design of the house within this area requires a setback of 10' for the front yard. Please see site plan attached. The property has been adversely impacted by the imposition of the AF-1 zone designation on this parcel subsequent to the time it was platted. Neighboring property owners and the Architectural Control Committee of the Starwood Homeowners' Association have agreed that this setback variance is appropriate. The applicant,~'ia a contract for purchase of the property from the ~~- owner and a thority from the owner to pursue this application. By H ext~ S. Klein At`ney-in-Fact for ~~Appl icant Signature • Robert Nicols Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Building Inspector to forward this applaication to the Boa d.of Adjustor nt and easor~ for not granting a building ~r it: ~ ~ ~~~ ` ~, ' Bui 1 di ng Insp. Si gnature~~,~'.~:~~=. ~~~.~ Date permit rejected: ~ /~~----- Board Decision Application Filed: Mailed: Date: Secretary, Board of Adjustment J ~>> .r i ADJACENT PROPERTY OYtNERS Owner Address Hartrich, James P.O. Box 10940 Hartrich, Carole F. Aspen, CO 81612 Schumann, W. Ford P.O. Box 4067 Aspen, CO 81612 Stein, A4arjorie B. P.O. Box 1047 Aspen, CO 81612 Parcel R-100 Starwood 16 R-74 R-75 R-79 Starwood 11 Metes & Bounds • No. 46926 County Treasurer's Office, Pitkin County, Colo. Aspen, Colo., ~~rp;nr~ of c~h5; K ~~i n , ~ ~ ~ C~ 1~ _ ~i,Jen~t-v, ~ ~? c~nd ~~ [ od ~ ~ , ~) ~ Account of bd o~c~~l is 3s-i-m~en~ ~a~~ ~ ~z- ~., - ---- Credit t~, Fund. ~I~o - (~~I3 ~~ By THE C. E. HDECNEL C~., DENVER '~c ~ ~~~1 g. ~S ~b `~~~~.~ iv31 nOLLARS Treasurer .Deputy ! ~ / A / } ~ ~ nn,n, o:,r ...,. ...... . - E< i; ~ C'': I, ~. C1 i- fi h: ~.s ~~ s:. ~ !) i ~ G; S BOARD Cir ADJUST?,ilsiVT April ?.7, 1982 ~Iernbers Present: Clark Sn!yth, Acti.ug Chairman ]Candi Shafl~ran Paul Y.rau~~ch Bob Tlirc,;n Evan Gul_1_ Clark Sm~;th c~cl_]ed th^ mcci.ing to order. first. matt.c~r at hand ~x;as to approve thc~ miuutcs from the last mectiug. I~,'van E:ull moved to approve the minutes, Boh 'i'hram second the motion. All in favor, the mot ion was patisE,d. Robc,rt Nicols= Lot 8701, Stax•v:ood lE~, Pitki_n_ County 82-7 requestini; a fl0' frontyard setback variance 1'or construction of a single family residence. Herb Klein was t:hc~re to request the variance. He e~:plai!ied that there was a 100' front.yard setback at the present time. createci.by the r!~cent mooning after the lot wa;~ plotted. 7'he lot is steep and has only one buildab]e area. Klein pointed out the tope lines on the p]ot plan. '1'1!e access ,road is Eppley Drive. Klein pointod out where the 100' setback would place the house, which is a uon-buildable area. He stated that the Starwood Homeowners Association Architectural Committee has given the preliminary approval for the site, but ~aerc.• waiting for ~. formal mectin,r;. At this time a formal meeting; has not been made due to a quorarn problem. Rlc>in s:: r; r,; sled that the isoa?•d could €;ive approval. coatiger!t to formal approval from the Starwood Homeowners Architectural Committee. Smyth pointod out another sec:tiorx of the land and questioned tti~hat was there. Klein rep]icd it was the same kind oC terrain and the owner t:~as determining if a fool could be p].acc~d un the l.ot due to a drainage proble!n. Smptri quc-.stioned ii the land falls 30'. Klein replied that it did. Smyth stated that the buildable area n~as not flat, but less steep. Klein a;-reecl. There were no objections from the r,eic;~hbers. Throm stet<.d that it a~as a classic case of topor,~ri:ph~°. Gull stated that it .vas a bettor plan than blowing the hillside up. P.a~ul I;r..~.usc:r motioned that due to the tol?or;raphical ha-rdships of the lot and the do~~:n- zoniug~ of the property that. they grant tlxe variance pond ~!!;; final approcal from tht~ Starwood Homeowners As<::~ci_ation Architactura]_ Comnuttee. Kandi Shaffran second the motion. All in favor, hfotion carried. I~,lecainm was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, //~ U Chairman-~`~- ----- ~vo. 4 6 9 2 6 ~ ~ $ ~~ ~db--- County Treasurer's Office, Pitkin County, Colo. Aspen, Colo., ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ qC.~ ~Rrr~e'up~ of h5~ 4~ ~~i r1, c ~ ~ ~ 1P _ -~~~+~ ~~ end ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ DOLLARS Account off" - - - - - - - Credit to Fund. ~~~ _ ~~~~ _Treasurer By ~~ Deputy TNF C. F. NUELK EL C~i., DENVER LARGE PLAT(S) AVAILABLE TO VIEW AT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AVAILABLE TO BUY AT CLERK & RECORDER