HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264316105812 (2007)(2)
DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Shect
Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Ordinance for thc BOCC and/or P&Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administratiye Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Refcrral(s) Lettcr
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (llxI7)
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, APPROVING THE WOODY CREEK SUBDIVISION MINOR
AMENDMENT TO A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ADJUST SETBACKS
Decision No.11L-2007
RECITALS
I. Woody Creek Homeowners Association ("Applicant"). has applied to the Community Development
Director of Pitkin County. ("Director"). pursuant to Section 2,20, l50(b) of the Pitkin County Land
Use Code ("Code"), to amend the Woody Creek Subdivision (fonnally the mobile home park) PUD
Guidelines to reduce the setbacks for Lots 45,58 (new portion of the Subdivision). The setbacks are
established on Pages 6 and 7 of the Guidclines. which are recorded per reception number 5j5412.
This will constitute the fourth amendment to the Subdivision approvals.
2. The properties are zoned MHP/PUD.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission granted approval to the Housing OHice for a fully
developed land subdivision exemption for the Woody Creek Tavern and Mobile Ilome Park
pursuant to Resolution No. PZ,99,2. A Fully Developed Land Subdivision plat was recorded as
Book 54 at Page 76.
4. Additionally, the BOCC granted approval in 2001 for Conceptual Subdivision, Planned Unit
Development, GMQS Exemption for deed,restricted housing units, Rezoning trom SR to
MIIP/PUD and Special Review for parking in the PUD pursuant to Resolution No. 085,200 I. In
April 2005, the property received Detailed and Final Plat and GMQS Exemption approval
pursuant to 130CC Resolution 046,2005. A Minor Amendment was granted in 2006 pursuant to
Administrative Decision No, 99,2006 for some lot line adjustments and a subsequent
Amendment was granted by the BaCC to eliminate the fire sprinkler requirement for cach
residence in 2007 (020,2007). The 130CC amended Condition No.5 of HOCC Rcsolution No.
046,2005 pursuant to 130CC Resolution No. 047,2007.
5. The Applicant submitted a complete application after July 6, 2006, thcrcfore, the application is
being considered pursuant to the 2006 Land Use Code.
6. The Director finds that the request is consistent with the requirements of the Land Use Code.
APPROVED by the Director, subject to the following conditions:
I. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made during the application process.
2. The Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution
No. PZ,99,2, and the Board of Count) Commissioners Resolution Nos. 085,200 I, 046-2005, 020,
2007 and 047,2007, and Administrativc Decision No. 99,2006, unlcss otherwise replaced or
amended by the conditions of this or said approvals.
3. The Woody Creek Subdivision PUD Guidelines (Reception No. 515412) "IV. Area and Bulk
Requirements" shall be amended as follows:
RECEPTION#: 543114, 10/15/2007 at
01:17:30 PM.
1 OF 3, R $0.00 Doc Code ADMIN
DECISION
Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitk,in County. CO
A. ' Lots 45-54: Decrease south side yard sctback from 15' to 10'.
,Lots 47 and 48: Decrease the front yard sctback from J 7' to 10'.
, Lot 55: Reduce the rear yard sctback from 10' to 5'.
, Lot 56: Reduce the rear yard setback from ] O' to 5'.
- Lot 57: Reduce the rear yard setback from 10' to 5', and reduce the south sid," yard
setback from 15' to 10'.
B. Number jO shall bc added to Section IV of the PUD Guidelines that statcs:
"The following overhang encroachments arc allowcd within the yard setbacks required
abovc in thc PUD Guidelines. This allowance does not apply to decks or covered
porches.
For Lots 56,57: Onc foot ovcrhang cncroachmcnt toward north lot line and a two t(Jot
overhang eneroachment toward the south lot line,
For Lot 55: Three foot encroachment into front yard setback.
Lot 50 shall have no overhang encroachment allowance,"
APPROVED by the Director, this \~ day of 0<-kb.~..r ,2007.
c9o-~_, R C9-JJo ~ ~
Cindy Houben,
Community Developmcnt Director
PID# 2643j6105812
1'144,07
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Cindy Houben, County Community Development Director
FROM:
Ezra Louthis, Planner
RE:
Woody Creek Subdivision Minor Amendment to a Development Pennit
DATE:
October 8, 2007
REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting to amend the Subdivision/PUD approval for some minor changes.
Specifically, the Applicant is requesting to allow for eaves to encroach into the setbacks for the new lots in
order to accommodate the new manufactured home dimensions. The encroachment would be no greater
than 4 feet into the setbacks and no eave (or portion ofthe structure) will eneroach into the 10' minimum
structure setback required by the building department.
Additionally, Staff will memorialize some setback changes that were requested in a previous applieation.
APPLICANT: Woody Creek Homeowners Association
REPRESENTATIVE: Daniel Kinney
LOCATION: Woody Creek Mobile Home Park (Upper River Road)
ZONING: MHP/PUD
BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Commission granted approval to the Housing Office for a
fully developed land subdivision exemption for the Woody Creek Tavern and Mobile Home Park
pursuant to Resolution No. PZ,99-2. A Fully Developed Land Subdivision plat was recorded as Book 54
at Page 76.
Additionally, the BOCC granted approval in 2001 for Coneeptual Subdivision, Planned Unit
Development, GMQS Exemption for deed,restricted housing units, Rezoning from SR to MHP/PUD and
Special Review for parking in the PUD pursuant to Resolution No. 085,200 I. In April 2005, the property
received Detailed and Final Plat and GMQS Exemption approval pursuant to BOCC Resolution 046,
2005.
PROPOSAL:
. PUD Guidelines Setback Variatious (these will require PUD Guidelines Amendments):
,Lots 47 and 48: Decrease the front yard setback from IT to 10'. The
original IT setback was established due to an easement, but the easement
is overhead electric, and the electric is to be buried.
,Lot 55: Reduce the rear yard setback from 10' to 5'.
,Lot 56: Reduce the rear yard setback from 10' to 5'.
000001 o-.f U
-Lot 57: Reduce the rear yard setback from 10' to 5', and reduce the south
side yard setback from 15' to 10'.
. PUD Guidelines Setback for Eaves on Lots 45-58 of the Subdivision: For Lots 45,58, eaves
shall not encroach more than 4' into the setbacks, and no eave (or portion ofthe structure) shall
encroach into the 10' minimum structure setback required by the building department.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Director approve the Woody Creek Subdivision
Minor Amendment to a Development Permit for some changes to Lots in the Subdivision based on
compliance with the standards noted above and subject to the conditions of the attached Administrative
Decision.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Draft Determination
ooonn2
Woody Creek Mobile Homeowner Association
P.O. Box 95 Woody Creek, CO 81656
970-923-1065 (phone & fax)
Don (Donny Mack) or Sandy McAllister
Summary Letter to Amend
We have homeowners who at different times will need to build new homes on lots which
cannot accommodate newer manufactured structure dimensions. The actions we are taking are
consistent with previous approyals in that fire separation regulations are not effected so do not effect
the proposed development as a whole. It is still residential. We in the HOA feel that allowing eaves
or overhangs into the setback does not impact significantly the character of this part of the
community in appearance. There is no new development, no off-site impacts, no increased danger to
public Health and no Land Use Code violations as I or the HOA are aware of. Occupancy remains
constant as the FAR & home sizes remains the same so there is no need for additional parking or
affect on open space. All it does is lessen the difficulty for our homeowners to build decent housing
for themselves.
So we on the board, on behalf of all the homeowners affected, are respectfully requesting
variances or minor amendments to the setbacks to read with the following changes and exceptions:
For Lots 45, 46: "The eave of any structure can extend into the 15ft. south side yard setback
provided that it does not come within 12ft of the south side property line."
For Lot 49: : "The eave of any structure can extend into the 15ft. south side yard setback
provided that it does not come within 10ft of the south side property line."
For Lots 47 & 48: "The front yard setback should read as 10ft. The eave of any structure
can extend into the 15ft. south side yard setback provided that it does not come within 12ft of
the south side property line."
For Lot 50: no change
For Lot 51, 52 & 53: "The eave of any structure can extend into the 15ft. south side yard
setback provided that it does not come within 12ft of the south side property line."
For Lot 54: "The eave of any structure can extend into the 15ft. south side yard setback
provided that it does not come within 10ft of the south side property line."
For Lot 55: "The rear yard setback should read as 5ft. The eave of any structure can extend
into the 5ft. south side yard setback provided that it does not come within 4ft of the south
side property line."
For Lot 56: "The eave of any structure can extend a maximum of 1 ft. into the north side yard
setback & a maximum of 2ft. into the south side yard setback."
For Lot 57: "The rear yard setback should read as 5ft. The south side yard should read
as 10ft. The eave of any structure can extend a maximum of 1 ft. into the north side yard
setback & a maximum 2ft. into the south side yard setback."
For Lot 58: "The eave of any structure can extend a maximum of I ft. into the north side yard
setback. "
Daniel Kinney
000 n n :3 Board member, Woody Creek HOA
Page 1 of2
Ezra Louthis
From: "Disco" Dan Kinney [dan@arrowdjs.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11 :01 AM
To: Ezra Louthis
Subject: Re:
mn Original Message -----
From: Ezra Louthis
To: "Disco" Dan Kinne)'
Sent: Friday, September 28,2007 10:25 AM
Subject: RE:
That is fine. I must say though, that we will probably lean towards doing something along the lines of all lots receiving an
exemption for eaves to extend into setbacks 2 ft., but we'll see.
For Lots 45, 46: that's OK here
For Lot 49: keep in mind that this lot has no south side neighbor
For Lots 47 & 48: that's OK here
For Lot 50: keep in mind his smaller setback
For Lot 51,52 & 53: "that's OK here
For Lot 54: keep in mind that there is no south side neighbor here
For Lot 55: I guess that's OK here
For Lot 56: that's OK here
0000B4
10/8/2007
Page 2 of2
For Lot 57: That's OK here
For Lot 58: This is OK too
Daniel Kinney
Board member, Woody Creek HOA
From: "Disco" Dan Kinney [mailto:dan@arrowdjs.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 20073:10 PM
To: E2ra Louthis
Subject: Re:
Attached is the amended letter you requested. Hope this works. Dan Kinney
----- Original Message -----
From: Ezra Louthis
To: dan~!l!Jowdis.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25,2007 10:26 AM
000005
';,!
10/8/2007
Page 1 of 1
Ezra Louthis
From: "Disco" Dan Kinney [dan@arrowdjs.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 200711:12 AM
To: Ezra Louthis
Subject: Re:
I just left you a voice mail. If the only exceptions to the 2ft. eaves were for lots 49 & 54 to allow for 4ft. eaves,
that would be great. Please keep in mind that they have no neighbor on that side. Dan
----- Original Message nm
From: Ezra LQuthis
To: "Disco" Dan Kinney
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 10:25 AM
Subject: RE:
That is fine. I must say though, that we will probably lean towards doing something along the lines of all lots
receiving an exemption for eaves to extend into setbacks 2 ft., but we'll see.
From: "Disco" Dan Kinney [mailto:dan@arrowdjs.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 3:10 PM
To: Ezra Louthis
Subject: Re:
Attached is the amended letter you requested. Hope this works. Dan Kinney
m__ Original Message _m_
From: Ezra Louthis
To: dan@arrowdis.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25,2007 10:26 AM
oooon6
10/8/2007
PITKIN COUNTY PRE-APPLlCATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PROJECT: Woody Creek Subdivision (MHP) Minor Amendment
LOCATION: Woody Creek Subdivision
OWNER: Woody Creek HOA
REPRESENTATIVE: Same (Dan Kinney)
DATE: September 25,2007
PID# 264316105812
Phone: 923-6506
PLANNER: Ezra Louthis, 920-5092
Type of Application: Minor Amendment to a Development Permit
Description of ProjectlDevelopment: The Applicant is requesting to amend the setbacks for the new lots in order
to allow for eves/overhangs.
Land Use Code Sections to be addressed in letter of request (applicationl:
Sec. 2-2Q-150(b): Minor Amendment;
Staff will refer the application to the following agencies: zoning
Review by: Community Development Director
Public Hearing: NO.
FEES: $693 (make check payable to 'Pitkin County Treasurer")
. Planning Office flat fee: $693 (non-refundable; based on 3 hours of staff time; if staff review time
exceeds 3.6 hours, the Applicant will be charged for additional time above 3 hours at a rate of $231/hour)
To apply, submit 2 copies of the following infonnation, unless noted otherwise:
1. Summary letter explaining the request, providing background on prior approvals and permits, and
addressing compliance with the Code sections listed above.
2. Amended PUD guide;
3. HOA letter of approval;
4. Letters from affected properly owners authorizing the amendment;
5. Proof of ownership of subject properties;
6. Total fee for review of the application;
7. Signed fee agreement (1 copy);
8. Copy of this preapp form (1 copy);
NOTES:
~ PLEASE SUBMIT ONE UNBOUND AND ONE-SIDED COPY OF YOUR COMPLETE APPLlCA TlON.
PLEASE SUBMIT TWo.-SIDED COPIES OF ALL REMAINING COPIES OF YOUR APPLlCA TlON (IF
POSSIBLE). THE PARCEL IDs SHOULD BE INCLUDED ON ALL DOCUMENTS INCLUDED IN YOUR
APPLlCA TlON.
~ ALL MAPS SHALL BE FOLDED.
~ This pre-application-conference summary is advisory in nature and not binding on the County. The
information provided in this summary is based on current zoning standards and staff's interpretations
based upon representations of the applicant. Additional information may be required upon a complete
review of the application.
DOoor!]. ~ ~
Woody Creek Mobile Homeowner Association
P.O. Box 95 Woody Creek, CO 81656
970-923-1065 (phone & fax)
Don (Donny Mack) or Sandy McAllister
Summarv Letter to Amend
We have homeowners who at different times will need to build new homes on lots which
cannot accommodate newer manufuctured structure dimensions. So we on the board, on behalf of
all the homeowners affected, are respectfully requesting variances or minor amendments to the
setbacks to read with the following changes and exceptions:
For Lots 45, 46: "The eave of any structure can extend into the 15ft. south side yard setback
provided that it does not come within 12ft of the south side property line."
For Lot 49: : "The eave of any structure can extend into the 15ft. south side yard setback
provided that it does not come within lOft of the south side property line."
For Lots 47 & 48: "The front yard setback should read as 10ft. The eave of any structure
can extend into the 15ft. south side yard setback provided that it does not come within 12ft of
the south side property line"
For Lot 50: no change
For Lot 51,52 & 53: "The eave of any structure can extend into the 15ft. south side yard
setback provided that it does not come within 12ft of the south side property line."
For Lot 54: "The eave of any structure can extend into the 15ft. south side yard setback
provided that it does not come within 10ft of the south side property line."
For Lot 55: "The rear yard setback should read as 5ft. The eave of any structure can extend
into the 5ft. south side yard setback provided that it does not come within 4ft of the south
side property line."
For Lot 56: "The eave of any structure can extend a maximum of 1ft. into the north side yard
setback & a maximum of 2ft. into the south side yard setback."
For Lot 57: "The rear yard setback should read as 5ft. The south side yard should read
as 10ft. The eave of any structure can extend a maximum of 1ft. into the north side yard
setback & a maximum 2ft. into the south side yard setback."
For Lot 58: "The eave of any structure can extend a maximum of 1ft. into the north side yard
setback."
Daniel Kinney
Board member, Woody Cree
onnnfl2
A. Setbacks and Unit Spacing for Lots 1-44
This section establishes yard setbacks and unit spacing for
Lots 1-44
1. Setbacks
Building to County Road 14 ft.
Building to Private Road 0 ft.
Building to Property Line 0 ft.
Building to PUD Boundary 5 ft.
Lot 1 Building to County Road 5 ft.
2. Unit Spacing
Side to Side 10 ft.
Side to End 10 ft.
End to End 10 ft.
B. Setbacks for Lots 45-58
This section establishes yard setbacks for Lots 45-58
Front yards are those yards adjacent to streets running north to
south with the exception of Lot 58. The Lot 58 front yard is
adjacent to the street running east to west.
3.
4.
00000:1
1.
Setbacks for Lots 45, 46 and 49
Front Yard 10 ft .
Rear Yard 5 ft.
North Side Yard 0 ft.
South Side Yard 15 ft.
Setbacks for Lots 47 and 48
Front Yard 17 ft .
Rear Yard 5 ft .
North Side Yard 0 ft.
South Side Yard 15 ft.
Setbacks for Lot 50
Front Yard 10 ft.
Rear Yard 5 ft.
North Side Yard 0 ft.
South Side Yard 10 ft.
Setbacks for Lots 51 and 54
Front Yard 10 ft.
Rear Yard 5 ft.
6
1111111111111111111111I111111111 ~~;~~:~~:;: 021
t;TlVHI ORVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 0.00 00.00
2.
Of)"'~1('l4
North Side Yard
South Side Yard
o ft.
15 ft.
5. Setbacks for Lots 52 and 53
Front Yard
Rear Yard
North Side Yard
South Side Yard
10 ft.
5 ft.
o ft.
15 ft.
6. Setbacks for Lot 55
North Side Yard
Rear Yard
Front Yard
South Side Yard
o ft.
10 ft.
10 ft.
5 ft.
7 . Setbacks for Lot 56
North Side Yard
Rear Yard
Front Yard
South Side Yard
8 . Setbacks for Lot 57
North Side Yard
Rear Yard
Front Yard
South Side Yard
9. Setbacks for Lot 58
North Side Yard
Rear Yard
Front Yard
South Side Yard
C, Maximum Density
10 ft.
5 ft.
10 ft.
15 ft.
5 ft.
10 ft.
10 ft.
15 ft.
5 ft.
o ft.
10 ft.
Oft.
The maximum density in the Park is limited to 7.5 dwellin
units per acre. Each lot is limited to one dwelling unit.
guest/mother-in-law apartment is permitted on Common Tract 2
D. Minimum Lot Area
The minimum Lot area is 2,400 square feet.
E. Minimum Lot Width
7
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~~;~~~~;!:; 021
SILVIR DAVIS PITKlt.J COUtJTY co R 0.00 0 0.00
PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF LAND USE APPLICATION FEES
PITKIN COUNTY (hereinafter COUNTY) andt "j i E: L K'lll!)I/ t'\ FO <: vJ:x.>t' C t f
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for if N< i AN (/c To VJOCYb',1 Cp tt J(
_P Vb (hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Pitkin County Ordinance No. 022-2006 establishes a
fee structure for land use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a
determination of application completeness. The fee structure is based on the County's policy that development
shall pay, in full, the cost of development review in Pitkin County. Fees have been set to be consistent and fair
to the public and to reflect the expense incurred in providing such services to the public.
3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed
project, it may not be possible at the time of application to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in
processing the application.
4. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that fees charged for the processing of land use applications
shall accumulate if an application includes more than one type ofland use review.
5. COUNTY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for COUNTY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or Board of County
Commissioners to enable the Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to make legally
required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision.
6. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the COUNTY's waiver of its right to
collect full fees ~rior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay a base fee in the
amount of $ b 3 . ClOwhich is based on"L hours of staff time, and if actual time spent by staff to process the
application exceeds the average number of hours by more than 20%, then the COUNTY will bill the
APPLICANT quarterly for the additional time spent. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of
the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for
suspension of processing.
PITKIN COUNTY
APPLICANT
Cindy Houben
Community Development Director
Signature
Efftctive 7/26/06 G:county\admin\\forms\2006 fees
OOnOn5
CHAPTER 2: REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES
2-20: General Land Use Procedures
2-20-150: Amendments to Development AppllcatJons and Permits
(b) Standards
(1) No application for a development pennit shall be accepted by the Community Development
Department after the denial of an application affecting the same property or any portion thereof
for six (6) months after the date of denial.
(2) The time period specified in this section shall be deemed to have commenced only after the
denial of an application for a development permit and the exhaustion or expiration of time for all
available administrative appeals.
(3) Building permit applications are specifically excluded from the provisions of this section.
2-20-150: AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS
(a) Applicability
This section establishes the procedures for minor and major amendments to development
applications.
(b) Minor Amendments Defined
A minor amendment to any development application or permit is one that meets the following criteria,
as determined by the Community Development Director:
(1) Is consistent with aclion(s) taken during previous development approvals for the property; and
(2) Does not change the use of the proposed development between residential, commercial and
tourist accommodation uses; and
(3) Does not change the basic character of the approved use of land on which the activity occurs,
including basic visual appearance and method of operation; and
(4) Does not constitute a new land development activity; and
(5) Does not increase off-site impacts in the surrounding neighborhood; and
(6) Does not endanger the public health, safety or welfare; and
(7) Does not violate any Land Use Code standard; and
(8) Does not substantially increase the need for on-site parking or utilities, or affect affordable
housing generation; and
(9) Does not increase the floor area of the use by more than five (5) percent or decrease the open
space on the site by more than five (5) percent.
(c) Major Amendment Defined
A major amendment is any amendment that does not meet the definition of a minor amendment in
subsection (b) above, or is othl!lWise determined by the Community Development Director to be a
significant departure from the original development application or permit..
(d) Amendments Prior to Issuance of Development Pennit
(1) Minor amendments to all development applications may be permitted during the land use review
process pursuant to the procedures in this section, with the exception of amendments to GMQS
applications, which shall be made pursuant to Sec. 2-40-40(b)(2).
(2) Major amendments shall require a new application of the same type required for the original
approval.
(e) After the Issuance of a Development Pennit
(1) MINOR AMENDMENTS
A minor amendment to any development permit (except final subdivision plats or subdivision
exemptions for which a separate process is outlined in Sees. 2,30-30) including SKI,REC and
Land Use Code
July 2006
Pitkin County, Colorado
Page 20
0000 (' E
i'l ~i
I '
I I' '
1 I:
1 ['
I I
I I.
1 II
1 I
1 I
1 I
: : I
I I
, I
, I
I 1 I
i i I
I 1 I
II!
: I: 1
: I: I
I II
_~_I 1
I I I
,
, I
::' I
I '
I I I'
I I I
\ I I I'
\1 II I,
I' 1 .
, ,\1 II
\i I I'
hi \ II
I' I ~,
\ II III
'. 1\ I \
:' I \1 j'
1\\ \ \
: :\,: :\I, ~
I 'I .. /,"" /
: I II' \ \ " ,/,/,>,3!':>~'t" /
I ! I' I'" / '\ ~_/ \ ~ <- - /~!-,./ / ij:-
I " ' / /;' .-'" / /' - / /" //!~ ~
I .,' ,c.v::.' ," / / -
I "" V / . "'" - / /"' ,/'
1 "I" " ", ,/,/ / / n ~
, I I '..< // /
. I . /// /
1 ' I' ,,~;. . - /
I I 1 I '. ~'.//>;:// /
00000.7 : '- //~(~~
, ':&t:;tq..
IO(,."'~
i I:"
I I
. I
,
"I?
=!i
.//,..-
/
,.
d
~/
~
IS
~
I!l;
efl.
II,
i
\
\\
II,
I,
,\
~
~
~!I
"'\
,::(')~;o"~'
\ . ,\
\ \
\\
I \'
\ ~ l1I>f\\'
\ ~ ~ ,<\n
\ \~,
\ '<
~
n
\\
\.',
c;:;:::::
IQ
~\I
:esl
I
\ .
~ \ \
~I .
!
\!l
~
lG
~
~
\
~
~
!g
~
~
~
~
'!l,
~~
~!
~i
~i~
PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5526 FAX# (970) 920-5439
October 8, 2007
Dan Kinney
PO Box 95
Woody Creek, CO 81656
Re: Woody Creek HOA Minor Amendment to a Development Permit
(CASE PI44-07; PID 2643-161-05-812)
Dear Mr. Kinney:
The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have detennined
that this application is complete. After a more detailed review of the submittal information, additional
information specific to the application may be requested in order to adequately review and process the
application. The planner in charge of the review will request the information from you directly.
If you have any questions, please call Ezra Louthis, the planner assigned to your case, at 920-5092.
Sincerely,
Bonnie Waechtler
Administrative Assistant
PITKIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5526 FAX# (970) 920-5439
MEMORANDUM
To:
Pitkin County Zoning Officer
FROM:
Ezra Louthis, Community Development Department
Re:
Woody Creek HOA Minor Amendment to a Development Permit
(p1D 2643-161-05-812; Case PI44-07)
DATE:
October 8, 2007
Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application submitted by
Woody Creek HOA. The Pitkin County Community Development Director will review
the application.
Please return your comments to me by Friday, October 26,2007.
PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS TO COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT IF YOU HAVE NO FURTHER NEED OF THEM.
Thank you.
."'
t~
liilMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP.ENT
· 130 South Galena Street
Aspen. Colorado 81611
(970) 920,5526
Pitkin County
Land Use:
172 Board of Adjustmen!
159 County Land Use Code
174 Fiat Fee V~
162 Zoning and Sign
169 Public Notice+
160 Planning Enforcement
i 75 Hearing Officer
Referral Fees:
Airport
County Clerk
County Engineer
Environmental Health
170
105
120
195
]15
150
llO
130
[52
]58
155
165
PZ005
185
IS
16]
BI202
B]203
EH025
Other
210
LUCOl
193
194
208
]98
190
209
206
Historic
Housing
Land Management
Redstone HPC
Wildlife Officer
Building Fees:
Board of Appeals
Building Permit
Electrical Permit
Energy Code Review
Mechanical Permit
Plan Check
Plumbing Permit
Reinspection
AVFD Fire Marshal
BFD Fire Marshal
Other Fees:
Use Tax
Copy
Master Pian Copy
Park Dedication
GIS Requirements
Housing Impact Fee
Road impact Fee
School Impact Fee
Air Quality Impact Fee
TOTAL
NAMEV(( ~J
ADDRESS/PROJECT
PHONE:
CHECK#
AJ
~,
C9
cC!-
Coqs
/(/~~,
INITIAL: