The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.03.13 . . PARCEL 10:12737-173-13-001 DATE RCVD: 7/21/2003 CASE NAME:1Jeff Vanderpol Setback V~riance PROJ ADDR:I CASE TYP:I # COPIES:r-- CASE N()f2003-13 PLNR:IJoanna Schaffner STEPS:I PHN:1927-B637 PHN:1927-9029 OWNIAPP: Jeff Vanderpol REP: Kevin MacLeod ADRI75q~e-arthstone Dr ADR:IBOX 818 C/Slz:1 Basalt, CO C/SIZ:1 Basalt, CO FEES RCVD:j$375 recpt#15442 81621 81621 FEES DUE:I$375 REFERRALSIHOA, County Engineer, Fire REF:l BVlJ.SChaffner DUE:l MTG DATE F REV BODY F.E36A . I I PH I NOTICED 18/14/03 I DATE OF FINAL ACTION:I 9/2/2003 REMARKSlBOA Resa to clerk 10/9/03/jt ~ l<.-+o re(J fOpiW DATE CLOSED: I BY: Ilsabel Calderon 000001 of 2~ . .. II Iii II III III III 111111 ~~~!~~ ~ I 23A SkVIR DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 0 00 D 0 00 RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADmSTMENT GRANTING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR JEFF VANDERPOL Resolution No. 2003-13 WHEREAS, JeffVanderpoJ owner of 1 03/] 05 Lupine Drive, is requesting a 30 foot Front Yard setback variance for the construction of a driveway and related improvements that will exceed six feet (6 ') in height; and WHEREAS, 30 feet is required for this ] 7,500 square foot lot in the R- 15-A Zone District; and WHEREAS, the parcel is described as Lot 32, Mountain Valley Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to l,,'Tant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 7-] 0.30, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28- 118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been demonstrated. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED by the Board of Adjustment, that a 30 foot Front Yard Setback Variance be granted for driveway improvements that exceed six feet (6') in height as shown on Exhibit A, due to topographic constraints. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: September 2,2003 !CL{crOS date ATTEST: 000002 . ~ 1,-::-, lIB I jZ 1 1~ , I: II! I'r 18 , II I " :1 I' l ~....,., ___J I - i(fJ) Yo ;0 Ii [! " '<:1 i~ i I' , Ii, ! I! : : n .~. ~~ , ~ ~ t y ~ "i,', ~ 3 € i: ~ ~ H~ ~ l;d ., , , , --------VI ....".,! " OJ !'-~. ~ ~j['~;' '1 -," - ., !~ 'iO.g;;, , ,. I ;::I 0 '1l', I ' o 'I,'.~"I "[! I o ::lQ..<D ;; , '~L ' ~illllllllllllllll 11111~;~~~~:~1 ~ I SILVIA DAVIS PITKHJ courHY CO R 0.00 D 0.00 I I t- '11 ~ 1~ [ q., " In '1 !Lit I,: I ;~ II , ~ ~ ~ ~h[ .. ~, ~:i ; ~ ~ ~H r ~~' , I ~ I c' !l li ~ i~[ Ie" I~ cd. ~t~ " ;~ 'I' . c , \ I ~ ~ OJ Q , , ~; ~ ~ ,.. :J-q ~ ,_ii' .. , ~ ~ ~ 9 1 j;,! : ~!" i n" :~ "I q:: i~ '.' "'" ~ ~ ~ !HI ,-<QI ~ ; :i i ~"1:.:r - :t ~ ~t -' '!"i. ~ n i ji ~ 1,1", ~ r~ '" I ~ ~ ~ ; ~ I~ 6' ~ i ~ ~ I t'f I' ~i 1'1 i; , II ~i l:f Lz ~ :,"',t--,i I, ...f:.- 'tf , , , , : I '1. q q!, ldgj, , ~ ~ 0, ~ lj " ;':'", "' ~ A 111 111 '-< j i H ~ ~ i , II , \ .__--,:1-\ \ , ", c z " > .J I ! ,- , ! I, I" ~ " ~ I ~ I , \ , /', \ "" 'i ' H ti f li -11 1 I' !l" ! IH! , H ~ Ii j I; Ii , , , , ! ' i I , ; , , ! , \~~:..--- \ I,g I " I I ' ~ "I,', ' ~ it. ' , , I f\] -;.. ~ tr -r ~ ::23~ tJc.!r "1' p!i :J fl\l'. ~ ~I! d '" I" " , " \" ~~ ;: ~ ",' ,~ ~ a 2 JI ~ I o to I ~< I" ~ ~ rOO " '" m Zm7J <~ mr ;:: "' =1 m ~ . o 1~2 ~ " ~'J ~, VANDERPOL TOWNHOMES Lot 32, Block 1, Mountain Valley 0103/0105 east lupine drive aspen, colorado 8Hill , . . MINUTES September 2, 2003 Meeting of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Members Present: Rick Head Jim Rifkin, Chair Mike Cooper Bob Throm Deanna Olsen Taber Sweet, Alternate Members Absent: Patrick McAllister, Alternate Staff: Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Officer and acting secretary Rifkin opened the meeting at 5:07 pm. Case 2003-11 Colver, Phillip 855 Mountain Laurel Drive Lot 93, Mountain Valley Subdivision Mr. Colver was present to request a 10 foot front yard setback variance where 30 feet is required on this 30,002 square foot lot in the R-15-A zone district for the construction of a residential garage. He submitted the Affidavit of Posting and several photos of the site. Mr. Richard Haberman, President of the Mountain Valley Homeowner's Association was present and stated that the Association had no objection to the request. Mr. Colver stated that the subdivision road was not constructed as platted in 1969. When he bought the lot in 1971, the road was unfinished and they never did what was on the original plat. Technically, the land belongs to the County, however, he has been maintaining the "road" as a private driveway for the last thirty plus years. The County said they will vacate the road. Cooper asked if when the County vacated the road, would a variance still be necessary? Colver stated no. Colver stated that according to the county engineer, Bud Eylar, the owership of the land would go back to the Homeowners Association. Cooper suggested that perhaps the vacation of the road doesn't really make a difference. Since there is no opposition from surrounding homeowners, and since he knows the area and believes there would be no negative impact to the public he was inclined to approve the request. Cooper then moved to approve the request due to topographic hardships. Throm seconded the motion and it passed 5-0 with Sweet not voting. 000004 2003-7 Kelley, Peter 42553 East Highway 82 Lot 11, Mountain Valley Subdivision Architect, Kevin McLeod and Peter Kelley were present to represent Mr. Kelley in his request for a 100 foot Major Road setback variance where 100 feet is required from the East Highway 82 right-of-way for the re-construction of an existing berm that will exceed 30 inches in height, a 50 foot Major Road setback variance for the construction of a duplex, and a 10 foot side yard setback variance where 10 feet is required for the construction of an 8 foot high fence. This site contains 17,163 square feet and is zoned R-15-A. Schaffner presented the requests to the Board. McLeod presented the Affidavit of Posting. Rifkin asked Schaffner if there was any opposition to the request. Schaffner stated that she had not heard from the Homeowners Association, and that one neighbor above and behind the Kelley lot was concerned from a visual perspective but did not file a formal complaint. Haberman was present and stated that the HOA has no problems with the requests. He believes that the concerns of the neighbors can be worked out, one neighbor was concerned about the height of the structure. McLeod stated that the 100 foot setback takes all of the building space away from the lot. He indicated the 100 foot setback on the site plan. He stated that they were staying away from slopes on the back side of the lot. Variances are necessary to rework the existing berm and to continue an existing R foot fence along the lot line. Kelley stated that a previous variance was granted for the existing fence to screen headlights from the highway. Throm stated that he remembered that case. McLeod stated that neither one of the adjacent property owners have objected. Rifkin asked about the height issue. McLeod stated that the proposed duplex is within the county height limit. The neighbor, Ms Cooney, requested a berm behind the house, but McLeod stated that a berm on the slope would not be effective. McLeod stated that there will be landscaping but did not have a copy of the plan with him. Haberman has already seen the plan. Native vegetation will be maintained and spruce and aspens will be added. Haberman believes this will allay the neighbor's fears. The applicant agreed to work with the HOA. McLeod stated that the ridge will be about four feet above the road. Throm moved to approve the three varianee requests due to downzoning and topographic hardships. Cooper seconded the motion and it passed 5-0 with Sweet not voting. 000005 , . . 2003-8 Vanderpol, Jeff 103/105 Lupine Drive Lot 32, Mountain Valley Subdivision Architect, Kevin McLeod was present to represent Vanderpol in his request for a 30 foot front yard setback variance where 30 feet is required on this 17,500 square foot lot in the R- 1 5-A zone district, for the construction of a new driveway and related improvements that will exceed six feet (6') in height. McLeod submitted the Affidavit of Posting. Schaffner explained how the 30 inch rule was changed by the BOCC last September to allow a six foot grade change for driveways. She commented that she has not heard from the Homeowner's Association, although Mr. Haberman is still present, and she has not received any objections from any of the neighbors. McLeod showed a site plan indicating fifteen and thirty percent slopes. The building envelope allowed by setbacks allows for development on slopes in excess of 30%. The existing parking is located off of the property. A new 10% driveway constructed to reach the building envclope will require a significant cut. Haberman said that the Association had no objection. McLeod stated that the Cmmty Engineer, Bud Eylar was pleased that the existing conditions were to be removed (ie, parking on the road) and that he favored the two access drives. Head moved to approve the request based on topographic hardships. Olsen seconded the motion and it passed 5-0 with Sweet not voting. 2003-14 Two Mile Ranch, LLC - This application was withdrawn by applicant 2003-15 Feldman, Gary 4076 Lower River Road Mr. Feldman was present to request a 30 foot front yard setback variance where 30 feet is required on this 21,380 square foot parcel in the AFR- 1 0 zone district for the construction of a single-family residence and garage. Schaffner presented the case to the Board. The existing carport located within the Rio Grande right-of-way will be removed. The driveway will be realigned, and a new garage is proposed. Steep slopes to the river limit the building envelope for the garage to the top of the slope near the north lot line. The proposed garage will be constructed on stilts to avoid development on the slopes. The existing residence lies within the setback and will be demolished. A new larger home will be constructed in its place and needs a variance to increase the amount of encroaehment within the setback. She stated that approval for an Administrative 1041 Hazard Review was granted. A letter from Mike Hermes, of the Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority (RFRHA), stated that RFRHA had no objections to the request. Feldman is in the permitting process with RFRHA now. 000006 There have been no objections from any neighbors. Neighbors Tom and Cindy Hanson were present to learn more about what was planned for the site. They stated that they had no objection to the request. Rifkin asked about the Affidavit of Posting. Feldman stated that his architect had it and that he was not yet present. Head moved to approve the request due to topographic hardship subject to receiving the Affidavit of Posting. Throm seconded the motion and it passed 5-0 with Sweet not voting. 2003-7 Raines, Doug Lot 6, Filing I, Brush Creek Subdivision This application has been tabled until next month. 2003-7 Chesley, Paul and Anderson, Alexander 43351 East Highway 82 Attorney, Tom Smith and architect, Dillon Johns were present to represent the owners in their request for a 50 foot Major Road setback variance where 100 feet is required from the Highway 82 right-of-way for the construction of a single-family residence on this 12.27 acre parcel in the AFR -10 zone district. Rifkin stated that he understood there were many people present opposed to the request. He stated that the applicant would first present their case, then the public would be heard. Schaffuer outlined the case. Although the lot is 12 acres in size, the building envelope approved in the 1041 Hazard Approval is limited by wildlife, steep slopes and debris flow hazards. Calls were received from people who were not neighbors but who recreate along Highway 82 and who stated that it seemed like a big house for a tight, little spot. Smith and Johns presented many photos of the site as well as of existing developments within the East Highway 82 100 foot setback. They illustrated the boundaries of the building envelope, the location of the various 1041 hazards, and where the 100 foot and 50 foot setbacks bisect the parcel. Johns indicated that this is the only place on the entire parcel that can be developed. Smith explained that there are at least three approvals on this parcel. A 1041 was approved in 2000, another 1041 was approved in May 2003 which superceded the first approval, and a Scenic Overlay approval was also granted. Visual impact issues were addressed in the Scenic Review, and FAR was addressed in both 1041 approvals because they specifically recognize the ability to build 5,750 square feet on this site. Smith stated that it is not for the Board of Adjustment to concern themselves with visual concerns or FAR issues. Both issues were already addressed by the County. Smith stated that a topOb'Taphic hardship exists because this envelope is surrounded on three sides by slopes where the County prohibits development. The proposed house size oooce7 . . is allowed by the zoning and confirmed by the 1041 approvals. Any concerns regarding these issues should have been presented during the other reviews. Photos of other development within the East Highway 82 100 foot setback were reviewed. Smith stated that with regard to setbacks and FAR, the request is not out of character with what is going on in the neighborhood. Rifkin asked if any Board members had questions. Cooper asked Smith ifhe were involved in any of the prior approvals. Smith stated that he was not. Cooper asked how many posted, public hearings were held. It was figured that at least three posted, public hearings were held before this meeting. Rifkin now turned to members of the public that were present to object to the variance request. Attorney, Lance Cote, representing adjacent property owner, Alan Potarnkin was first to object. Cote stated that if the house were redesigned, the variance could be less intrusive into the 100 foot setback. Throm stated that they are not an Architectural Design committee. Head stated that Cote's point is not germane to the hardship. Cote argued for a balance between the hardship vs. the need for the variance. A redesigned house wouldn't need a 50 foot setback, but maybe just a 30 foot setback. Throm stressed again that they do not review design issues. Cote then stated that as requested, the applicant has not shown an adequate topographic need for the variance. Head asked what would the significance be in moving the structure back another 30 feet? Cote responded that the hardship to the public would be reduced. Throm asked what was the hardship to the Public? Cote responded that the Northstar Nature Preserve and trail were across the street. Throm responded that those do not impact this lot. Cote stated that the purpose of the setbaek is for the public benefit off the highway, and if you reduce the encroachment into the setback, you reduce the impact on the public. Throm stated that he did not ai,,'Tee with Cote's point. Cooper asked if Cote was present or ifhis client had representation at any of the other public meetings. Cote stated that he was not and that he did not know about other representation. Attorney, Jennifer Causing, was present representing the Preserve Homeowner's Association. Cooper asked if the HOA were conterminous with the subject property. Causing stated yes. Throm asked if she had a plat showing the location ofthe HOA lands. She did not have a plat but stated that the HOA land was right across the street from the subject property. Throm stated that he wanted to see it on a map to see how it relates to the subject property, and ifCausings did not have a plat there was nothing to discuss. Rifkin did not agree and suggested Throm use his imagination. Causing raised safety issues with the proposed development, stating that the location of the house is on a curve. She stated that Section 3-50-020 B of the Land Use Code pertaining to Road setbacks states that "in order to provide essential sight distances along arterial highways, major roads, and collector streets for vehicular traffic and pedestrians entering and leaving such rights-of-way, uses other than structures, (including off-street 000008. parking, signs, and lights) shall meet the following minimum setbacks: Major roads: 50 feet". Our position is that this is a safety concern. There is no topographical necessity to allow the house a 50 foot setback. If the house were located further back on the lot, it would provide a more visual allowance for traffic coming into Highway 82. Head stated that these arguments are not germane to this meeting, that the applicant is requesting a setback variance from the highway, and that the BOA routinely approves these requests. Cooper asked Causing if she was present at the three previously posted meetings, and she responded that she was not. Cooper asked if the HOA had sent anybody to any of the three previously posted meetings. Causing did not know. Diane Stouffer was also present to oppose the request. Ms Stouffer lives "up the highway" from the subject site, and stated that she is opposed because of the visual scenic corridor and the proposed master plan which is not yet adopted. She doesn't believe the site was previously posted. Someone? disagreed, stating that he himself posted the sign. Rifkin again stated that they are considering a topographic hardship, and that the BOA does not have the authority to determine whether or not the other meetings were correctly posted. The BOA can only determine whether or not there is a solid basis to !,'Tant or deny a topo!,'Taphic variance. Stouffer then stated that she did not understand what is the hardship. The owner bought the property knowing it would be difficult to develop. The BOA has granted variances to house after house because of unnecessary and uncalled for hardships. Cooper asked if she or her representative was present at any of the three previously posted meetings. She asked why that question was relevant. Head stated that then was the appropriate time to address her concerns. Cooper added that over a long period of time, the property was posted for the public to attend. He stated that the County puts these lots through "an exhausting level of scrutiny. We are the last people in the food chain only dealing with a very small matter. The esthetic matters all came prior to us." Stouffer reiterated that she didn't believe that the property had been previously posted, she saw the sign and eame to voice her objection. Throm offered that Ms Stouffer had another place to oppose the request, but it wasn't "in this room". Smith suggested that if she had concerns about the posting, she could bring them to the attention of the Planning Department, but they approved it and they always check on the notice. Maureen McCloskey was also present to oppose the request. Ms McCloskey lives about three miles up the road. She stated that the applicant knew what the building envelope was when they bought the lot. This is not a hardship. What if the next thing they want is a 15,000 square foot house? Moving the house forward will allow them more room to build a bigger house. Throm stated that that is a supplication which has no bearing here. McCloskey offered that the East Aspen master plan has a major goal to maintain a rural quality of the neighborhood, and to reduce the visual impact of houses. If you ean't 000009 . . require landscaping, the only thing you can do is to maintain the setback from the road. And to follow our master plan. Otherwise, what's the point of the plan? If anybody who wants to change it can change it, or it should be changed to a 50 foot setback for everybody and then they wouldn't have to be here. There is no consistency in the rules. The applicant has not shown any hardship. Richard Haberman was present and stated that he is one lot removed from the subject parcel. He asked if the lot was posted for this meeting. Schaffuer stated yes. He questioned the hardships of other residences located within the 100 foot setback. Haberman stated that there is now a eorridor of buildings along the highway as you leave town heading east. He believes there is enough room within this envelope that a variance would not be needed. Head stated that they are not here to cite the house. Bob Lewis was also present. He stated that there are already so many exceptions to what the applicant is asking for, and that there are houses a lot closer to the highway thay it doesn't seem to make any difference. He drives into Aspen sometimes twice a day, and he wouldn't object to seeing a house there. Rifkin asked the Board if they had any comments. Olsen suggested to the architect that they could still build 5,750 square feet on the site and not have the encroachment that they do; perhaps if the corridor to the rear were shortened for example. It could easily be done. She ab'Teed that they are not an Architectural Review committee, but asked, do we have a right to allow more variance than somebody actually needs? Smith responded that not a single application comes before the BOA that couldn't be redesigned. This building envelope was approved by the County for 1041 Hazards and Scenic Overlay. Olsen said that that was what she didn't understand. Head moved to approve the request based on topOb'Taphic hardships. Throm seconded the motion and it passed 5-0 with Sweet not voting. Schat'fuer stated that appeals to this determination may be made to the Board of County Commissioners. Minutes: Head moved to approve the minutes from the July 8 and August 5 meetings. Olsen seconded the motion and it passed 5-0 with Sweet not voting. Head moved to adjoum the meeting. There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. ************************************************************************ 000010 Respectfull y S ubmi tied, /O--G--0> Date 000011 / Acting Secretary Approved as submitted Approved with no change(s) Date Chairman . PlTKlN COUNTY BOARD OF AD.JIISTMENT Application Form . DATE 0'7 /'2. W 0 ~ P-illPRESENTATJVE~"/N MAtlup PHONE t:f2. 7~ 'O~ E-MAlL ,,^V\..@~O,~,c,..Mi...i FAX~M- MAlLINGADDRESS r.O.e>>OJt .'$ I~AVr'...'I, CO. hll,2.L OVlNER ~ VJrNt>~PI>L. PHONE -'~"1~ Bl-~ ;._ MAlLINGADDRESS_7~ tiJ.~T"'~nlo4e Ct~'/~4.r, .'/j)~' LEGAL DESCRJPTION ~trl SUBJECTPARCELADDRESS.-bJ6~/' "~ 'MT \ "P~ ~Sfl'kN, 8/1,,1' PARCEL lD # ----2.'1a1~"1~.. 12,. 6 0 LZONE DlSTRlCT---l'''I~ Jt. LOT SIZE...k"J 11!500 'ii.t:. SIGNATURE ~/7 /' ...--' (T 0 be completed by the Zoning Department) Requesting: CASE # C<t;O~ -I") 'Front Yard Setback Variance, where , Rear Yard Setback Variance, where , is required. , is required. '_ Side Yard Setback Variance, where~' is required. '_ Side Yard Setback Variance, where"~' is required. 'Height Variance, where _' is allowed COlrm1ents: Applicationfiled <{ - \ -G -; C' .~ -.. (' ( ')' Refer to !--1 (j A, ."'~o.,.t,-,~ ;:1"t"Ji' ~_, ZOillng OfficlilJ ~; e.~-0 ; )-'::''x;' 'o--?" ,,'3...((... Date of Meeting Cj - 2.. -0, """ C I Notices Mailed 7 I ~I . c ~ Secretary _,,* ;nr0 000012 4f17!02G:\ComD~v Forrns\J>ilkin l'lBoning\pilkin\t..oB\admin\pil_boB\Ilpplic doc MAC LEOD Df-SIGNS, Lm Po. Bc, 818 2UH MldLmd Ave B..:l':>~]t CO 81A)1 p, 970 927 9030 f- 97U 927 9029 E nldkalsopl"l'i.rJt't . . VANDERPOL TOWNHOMES VARIANCE REQUEST DESCRIPTION The owner of the property located at 0103 I 0105 East Lupine Drive, further described as Lot 32, Block 1, Mountain Valley Subdivision requests a variance for installation of a drivew81Y and parking area. The drawing titled "Existing Site" provides an analysis of the slopes on the property. It shows that the majority of the property consists of slopes that are 15% to 30%, and slopes that are in excess of 30%. Due to a band of slope in excess of 30% which stretGhes across the majority of the front of the site, it is impossible to create access into the property without crossing these slopes. After careful consideration of the options for driveway-parking- building design, we have come to the conclusion that the design we have presented best satisfies the standards set forth in Section 3- 80-050 C. of the Land Use Code. By locating the structure in the same location as the existing structure, site re-grading is reduced to a minimum. The existing structure currently violates the rear setback, and the existing parking resides in East Lupine Drive right- of-way. The proposed parking will be located within the setbacks instead of on the street, and existing grade cuts will be returned to their natural, historic grade and re-vegetated so as to promote a permanent and stable condition, as well as more visually appealing. The parking cuts we are proposing will be a maximum of 8'ot tall. Appropriate retention of these proposed cuts will be implemented and properly documented in the construction documents as represented in detail #2 on the drawing labeled "Proposed Site". This project received 1041 approval on July 15, 2003. 000013 ~I!"~!L~~O ~4:22 MAC LEaP DESIGNS, LTD. RO,.BDx 818 2011 ""cl",od A.... ea..1t, co mia' p, 970 927 \lO3O F, 970 927 9029 E, rn41""'Pr..o" aoooB: ~/~~278538 r'At:ll::- tll . . July 21. ;2003 Pitkin County Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 To VI/hom It May Concern: As the owner of the property Ioc8ted III 010310105 East Lupine 0rIIIe, furthflr delJaIbed as Lot 32. Mountain ValleY Subdivllllon I do authorize Kevin W. MacL.eod, and Macleod Designs, Ltd to represent my inlel'e$t& in the m&tt8r of II vari8nCe for the ins1allatlon of a driveway for the propoeecl Vanderpol TownhOme&. The you r your ration in ttlill mlltt8r. A Je~ II rPo1 750 Hearthstone Orllle BSB8lt, COlOrado 81621 927-8837 . . PROJECT DATA VANDERPOL TOWNHOMES 0103/0105 East Lupine Drive Aspen, Colorado 81611 Owner: Jeff Vanderpol 750 Hearthstone Drive Basalt, Colorado 81621 ZONING Legal Description: Lot 32, Block 1, Mountain Valley Zone: R-15A Allowed FAR.: 4,550 S.F. Setbacks: 10' Side and Back, 30' Front Height Limit: 28'-0" to Midpoint FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Existing structure: 3,780 :t S.F. Site area: 17,500 S.F. Allowed FAR. = (17,500 x 20%) = 3,500 SF Add'l Duplex FAR. = (3, 500 x 30%) = 1,050 S.F. Total Allowed FAR. = 4,550 S.F. (Exempt Garage FAR. = 500 S.F. per unit) Total Proposed F.A.R. for New Duplex = 4,547.2 S.F. Total Garage FAR. = 1,000 S.F. 000\11S 000016 . . VICINITY MAP VANDERPOL TOWNHOMES -----.-J Directions: Heading East on Highway 82 / Main street in Aspen, pass through town and follow for approximately 1 mile toward Independence Pass. Turn Left on Mountain Valley Drive, right on East Lupine Drive. Property is on the left. Sign posted in front yard of property with clear view from East Lupine Drive. . VANDERPOL TOWNHOMES ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS David Kidder 91 E. Lupine Drive Aspen, CO 81611 Terry Haynes 153 Mountain Laurel Drive Aspen, CO 81611 Joel Tobin 0123 Mountain Laurel Drive Aspen, CO 81611 Christopher M. Faison 0143 E. Lupine Drive Aspen, CO 81611 Gerald and Carol Alpern 0118 E. Lupine Drive Aspen, CO 81611 ASPDEVCO LLC 10000 Shelbyvilled Road, #100 Louisville, Kentucky 40223 000017 . , !c. ., . =f '" ~ ~ - L .3 . &I cr, ! ,j' ~ :,f . f - 1 .. - .- I : f(\ - - n .. J . . , ... 'j 1] '1 ,~ ' n ... 000018 ., .l ~i , ! t i' 1 i t \. \ . . ,. i ! - ~~'-'~7~.'( '''~. ,i-......., '., )( ... .... .. :) Q cr -z: - ~ - ,c III , '1 l'" ..... I"l)...;.. ~. . . . ~ \ l. '" 'V'" , --"v . , j J: ~':. (. I ---- ,. ~ .' , .' :H~.: \. ;' ... ~ :. " e~'" I).,PL!.)C. 1',.11-" 'JlIf, e-IIT 000019 . . AGENDA PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT September 2, 2003 5:00 P,M. Pitkin County Courthouse CASELOAD: 2003-07 Paul Chesley and Alexander Anderson 43351 East Highway 82 Requesting a 50 foot Major Road setback variance where 100 feet is required from the Highway 82 right- of-way for the construction of a single family residence on this 12 acre parcel in the AFR- 1 0 zone district. 2003-11 Colver, C. Phillip 855 Mountain Laurel Drive, aka Lot 93, Mountain Valley Subdivision Requesting a 10 foot Front Yard Setbaek variance where 30 feet is required on this 30,002 square foot parcel in the R-15-A zone district for the construction ofa residential garage. 2003-12 Kelley, Peter 42553 East Highway 82, aka Lot 11, Mountain Valley Subdivision Requesting a 100 foot Major Road Setback variance where 100 feet is required from the East Highway 82 right-of-way, for the re-construction of an existing berm that will exceed 30 inches in height, a 50 foot Major Road setback variance for the construction of duplex, and a 10 foot side yard setback variance where 10 feet is required for the construction of an 8 foot high fence. This site contains 17,163 square feet and is zoned R-15-A. 2003-13 Vanderpol, Jeff 103/105 Lupine Drive, aka Lot 32, Mountain Valley Requesting a 30 foot Front Yard Setback variance where 30 feet is required on this 17,500 square foot lot in the R-15-A zone district, for the construction ofa driveway and related improvements that will exceed six feet (6 ') in height. 2003-14 Two Mile Ranch, LLC - Application withdrawn by applieant - variance not required. 2003-15 Feldman, Gary 4076 Lower River Road Requesting a 30 foot Front yard Setback variance where 30 feet is required on this 21,380 square foot parcel in the AFR-l 0 zone district for the construction of a single-family residence and garage. 2003-16 Raines, Doug Lot 6, Filing 1, Brush Creek Subdivision Requesting a 13 foot front yard setback variance where 30 feet is required for the construction of a single- family residence and a detached caretaker dwelling unit (CDU), a 15 foot front yard setback variance for a retaining wall linking the driveway to the CDU, a 30 foot front yard setback variance for a retaining wall on the east side of the property, and a 15 foot side yard setback variance where 20 feet is required for a retaining wall on the east side of the driveway. The parcel contains 2.33 acres and is zoned AFR-I O. MINUTES: Please be prepared to comment/approve minutes from the July 8th and Aug 5th meetings. PLEASE CONTACT JOANNA AT 920-5105 TO CONFIRM YOUR ATTENDANCE 000020 . . PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Front Yard Setback Varianee for Lot 32, Mountain Valley Subdivision NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, Septl~mber 2, 2003, to be!,>in at 5:00pm, or as soon thereafter as the conduct of business allows, in the Commissioner's Meeting Room in the Courthouse, 506 East Main Street, Aspen, before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, to consider an application submitted by Jeff Vanderpol, requesting a 30 foot front yard setback variance where 30 feet is required on this 17,500 square foot lot in the R-15-A zone district, for the construction of a driveway and related improvements that will exceed six feet in height. The property is located at 1 03/] 05 Lupine Drive, and is otherwise known as Lot 32, Mountain Valley Subdivision. For further information contact Joanna Schaffner at the Pitkin Community Development Department, (970) 920-5105. Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Published in The Aspen Times on August 23, 2003 --------- -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ --------------- Pitkin County Account No. 002.02 000021 o o o o N ) j' ,-. c ,:,-, ~ ~~ -" r~ "J -'-' " '-:T' ,'~~ "'-c; c,' -";-.' ~ "r_ < r-' ~. ''l '-: ,~, I ; ~, " ~ 00".- "",--G ;"1"" 1 '~ " , ~ ________________ 01011- --------------...., /~ ~ -----------. ~ ~ ~~ " \/ \ J; r' - ~ ,-'- ,,-t I "'0"_ , ------" ~ .. 'I~ " I ----------.ltl!o~ " \ ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~~C-~ - t- '.!' -' j, c' , ~~ 2. ,~ i'-, ,-, I;" IV I" I'"~ ,': ~ I~:~ ., ;-j ~ : ,:..:; ;' .' I; "-, -, r'o~: ' I~" ,-, ,," 0: :,' \ \ " -(I , 1,.,:"',' I'" -;~l~-~~' \ \ ,. I I'l -fi"5C ~;,.< - ____________01r1l~"- ,..----- ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ us ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~t:::S ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 8bG ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ---- :" " ~ ~ ~ ::t,;:: ~ ~ ~ ~ t;; ~ SCARROW << WALKER lNCORPORA TED Registered Land Survl?yors 818 Colorado Avenuf' Gl""WQod Spclngs. r:nIQr<Jdo 81601 (970) 945--8664 l I~ ( ~ ,', , ~ " -.",; " ',,- -".1 'I' ,:c < ~ ~:'" r.l;> ;-~ -~ '" - ~" ,:'-'i-',-_":;- , ,- .,-- ,,-. r" ;::::; ~- ~ -, - "', T ".L'" ,,' 'Jr., " '-f) ,I '" r~, ;;:: 0> ;; ," ,~ 'j ~~ -;;:;c,,- ." , , '2 ~: ')C_" "1'~ ;.~1 0: ~::;_ r-.-' , -,- '; ~-, .~ =; " 1: ~~ ~~ " ,-- '-, ,~, , ; --,:' (,(- ,< -~ '. ~ ~ 'r:' ~ 'J'" c'-i C : ~ ,:0' \ ~~ _0,""" ." r~ ,:,,~ cO;'~ '-'--:" . '~ ~ ( I.~~:, ,:;:; " -,:i"; ,3-; ".,-,- U' ,_, ::i-i,,-, '" :,i PREPARED FOR. Jeffery Vanderpol ,~ , " "') co,,", rl-r- "'" " ',~ ,- .c~ _, 7' * .. -;-'_: " : ,~ .0, I,: 1'- l'l. T '1:' ,~ C' I" ~ _'Jt:;, ~o L'l . 'ee' :';', ',~ , , I c' ----------------------- ~~ --"'" """ 91" ~ " --I ,,-\- \, - , C R.C'",_ ~ [ I ('1 \\, \I. ~ ~ _r\' -----------'----------- ,- "-- ~~' ,~, " 'I II -, r~~ ,'.'r..;,,' 'ii' ":i/.,,1."]c.;J-i'" shi'et no I ':1Ij:-,n 0' C','fj,k:'r'l' 1 ":"" 1"- p<:, OF -'c~r,-- _ '7-w.-r" '.'(VI 1 ,,:-- ',i \ ',,----'" l I ~ \':-,.--, '.". '," I \ /.''-'''< o o o o N W tJJ& . o c.' m I , ,.': " " ~ ~ I" 11! I" ~ ~ ~ , , X G r 5 0 <) " ~ '" <) ,~ u ~ ~ 11! , z ~ z " '" " "' Ii '" '" " ~ m m " " " ,- c --:>-..... -::; ,- " ,I I n ~ <I' iil 7 ~ (~ " !, " "' r m (j " m !: c " " ~ , " c m ;~' , . M " I f- " ~ <) f- " " " CO ~ G m ;p J~ --SroS' ----ifd -r-c"rfl li\ ; -he? 'C -0 Z li\ n/Pg o ~ li\ ifOG" . . 1 1 \ I(f! I~ \:1 I'" ,g \m I 1 \ III X l"i\ :::l z ~) U1 =i m Q0()r;J . , "1"1 i I" i~ ~ c /I'III!UIH I>> ! J ~.~ III , i Ill~ VANDERPOL ~ ->< ~ 1--1--.1: 'hj 'I! 'I ~ -. Lot 32, Block 1, Mountain Valley ...:0. .. :~I~ lIP il.i~i '0= III i I~ 0 -" 0103 ! 0105 east lupine drive 0 ~CQ I~ - aspen, colorado 81611 n.h I 'Ii! i m I : ~ " ~ '. Iil m . o o ::.:l :::;) ".J ...-- ( -. II-..) ) I ~ I I I I I I II I ; ; , I E~8l;~rn~ HnH~ ;;: ~ 111 l 2 ffi ~ f Tn ~ if: i7. (j "I \:) t) 7'1 P 111 f (\ t~ m ~ m \ \ \ ~\ \ \ 1~ I'm 'iil u , / '7 C1 ~ ~ ~ 1 I I 1~ , , ~) -I ~ ~ ;~ '10 ~ ~~" lj P .\ 11 'i h l " . , ~ ~ 11 , ~ ~~ p- "- d ~- ~ cl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i " i ! , l , , i ~ ~cij]<J' ""t.<;oo'a ~ \' =--1.-/ ",;ria ~ -0 Z. iii , o C!. <::: iii R' ~' ~~ lid e' H '" ," g J h li , ! ; , ! ,. ~ , I 7\- I I i \ " \ . z\ ~ 1..\ 'C5 ~\ ,I Z\ ___.n, w'--"-r \ :~ \ ,I" \ \ \ \ I \ I \ \ I \ \ , ~ I :\ , iff i'~ ~ '. jj~ o , c . m c o m "1 ' . " ~ ^ g ~ ~.~ ~ ~ lfil ., IJ\ (l I ~ ~ ~ ~ 9, ~ (,) :;t--g Irl ~~. !] if 2 }j ,.1 . ~ t) ~ t I~ () " ~ !II ~l ct ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ m ..., g <;f'\J! f<: }Jn1 I E ~ ", " ~ 9 S Ii1 1]1 tr .2 (Ire , " 0 " " ~ " " n 0' ." ~ {} ~ It ~ d If [~ III ch N Il~_ 'J j 001 ----~;~ ,Z9o ... --- rf' '-\ I' \ __----;- cfi /1 f) 1 " ,? \ j N I , I I \ I I \ \ 1 \ l(!l ,~ \:1 I'" Ig \m 1 1 \ \ 1 \ \ 1 \ \ I \ ---; :\1- ':.\'- 60 L9\'l _--;;:- '3 Qt., t,o _- (t,!.! '-:---r-~ !~ ~) IJ> WT:' ~' / G 'J. ~',-,' , ,tJ' !;'Q' f.'" , r ~11 , .' r , " ~ , ~ ~ ~ ")~ ;l 8 oj- lii tllt\l ,/ ~ ~ ~ .~: ~ -~ 'lltl '.' J~o ~ ~ ~ , , l ~ '1, fl ~ ~ ~ rH , r,l 1<'0 ~' \fI ~ ~ I ~ q " " '" , ~ q ~ Q ~ l,] ~.1i '1 ::; <:J 1'\1 .:J :i" ~ :t g n " q ~ , n I' I' h Iz II) 1~1 :~ ,I~ Ii 1M I~ L ~. 'i ~. ;1 'CI Ii) r\ y _{ 3 n: f; ,\l . , I, ill m (f' y. r 01 '1\ , , ., :L rn[ \ [l Tl"j GI'~ I'" ! , , " It C_j 41 f,i (I ~l A1 q ~ II' ) , t 7- (\ ~) :.I Ij> ~ ~ " ~ _I nl (') c? ~ ~ T l, 1I '1 fJ 7 ri-1 j , . , l n " 111 L. v rn < \: e- (1,-" ~ -11 L \1 . (" '-' 9 () ~ h- " () 11, () Z / , ) i'i11.l '__ I) j ~ ~ " ~ n ,Ii, 7 m 1\1!( L \[1 "' ? , 1\1,' J>\j1 - ,_,I "'- ,ili (I \ l1 \01 ~ el, g n T 7'1. I)) ~ " .n :~ t. ~i ~ \~ (l j ~ ] ~ ~, () ! \1) i , ..0: (_I \1 It) y \l , 'l [1, ~! .7 / (; (-i, , n '" ~ J , " , ~ r ~I u. ~ n ~ ((11 t> A n ~ 1rl " n ~ - C\ -17 n n '" / \.1 'II fJi I ~ c ~ ~ C 7 II 7' " {(ll_J--lll1: " '" , (\0 [) I I) (,' 0 J ij' ~I :-1 (:-1 7 [ -I r)' J 'i 11 ; 11'\:r . ~ " , (I - \T1(j ~ n CI I\: :i (\ f)' , IT "' n Tl jl {i ", ~, " tll I.' 117i r 11 j)()I._, ~ 1\1 l' . ),1 r: \11 J (n I ~ /- -, j e- n j ,. (I,' ;.- 1 " l' '! ~' iI' 9 ~ '\1 G ~ 'l~ ~1 ~ Z ;: -I mill '-.\0 ,,' T ti rn ~ l1 .l ,: 9 ~ ': ~ ~:~ I' ,n ,'.~ '" ,- :-; ::1 ';;.i-*' ~/ (fid' ";I~~- -.6~.o~ ~. . \ \ \ \ \ " \ B \ ~ " .~ 0 <l! " ~ ~ l' n ~ n ~ I I I I I I . " "I, "II 'I, I, I I I \ -':\,--:---- ,\\:J.-_1, 1 \ \ \ \g " \~ ij~ % \' P"I~ 1 \ c -L}j~11 -\ -J l~~1 1m ,I Cl fl) ~ ~ Ul t. m c z =, );- I I I c z 1 IJl ~ ~ ~- "I ~ 'I . 1 1 b 10 I'" \"1 1 1 \ \ \ \ " ~N?_""C \ i C Ct ..\ " \ , --/-1- -' \ i'\S\~ 'J' J. in, '~('l :b '6-' '( !J.- .-SL--'-- o !: I (:j< y~ ? e \J Y70m Z 70 -- m \J :So m, :;:: Ul --\ m , I " n z " ~ ~ " I ...\ \ \\\', I' \'. I"" I , \ I \ i I / \ L------1I :\ I \ _- L. 1\" ~ \c-- 0" 11 \ '~.J'--- "__--- ,9Z.96 ,"" 0> ',~; ?\ _ /8: '1 ~\ 'I-' _---- I, 110> iR!, l) _---of:.6f."L9S 1\j'1.) i,\. _-- M" 10> I!~: 'I~ ~ I,di i~> -,' :w ~ B "' ~. ~ \l " ,~ .)> '"' . ,-L ...Joil':l a 0:0 "~iL I 11~ 'w . Q) .,-0 <:> ~ ~ a :~i~ VANDERPOL TOWNHOMES II!!!I Up! _.~ ,&::I.", '; l 13JJ3 -0 ~ ~ :U<> i ~ ~I ...... "'-0 " 1 Lot 32, Block 1, Mountain Valley -00 '" I. , BPlj!!!l!l 0 !lJ..C> . . 0103 ! 0105 east lupine drive iir(IJ< ,. < , ':S [co" 1~ ~ , f HilL! '!Il 0 I';:,~ .. aspen, colorado 81611 ::E ,~ c, , ~ u' - =, lil ., . ~.}\~ " it..-t, ;"~i~ ,~,Jt ,_06:_,3'; rn \} c r \l m ~ Iii I " 7 Z " ~ I I' H L~ ~"' ^n B ~; ~* m~ i',","~~~ i ~ }l1~r~ j~A c ~~" ,!f;~L" .._ t~li,. '~'1r~1\~~Z0~)<~ 1\1ll:"j 1- \.0".1" 'lTd ~:, 1 J":k.,1:-} t -;'.1 ~ I 11-'=j,4;~~ '1-, "f-!~~ I, I -Ji;, ~~';\ I ,;IJ,',',"',"'f''''','''''J ,1'''c,u~~-'1f,ta +- ,,~~~~i_L~i~~Ji;j: B ,~I"jll ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~: R "' '! Cl~ " ~ ,,: ~ eel (" ~) ~ ~~ 1 ~ m " "' n II m 6 u m ~ ;J'i ~~ Co l;] "n (:!~ I~ ~ fo ~~ z ,~ .. 1 ~ m " [:, ~ I r,: (.~ (; , \ i )'; ~ o o o o N cJ\ CIl C ttl . Gl ~ C m r m < m r - Q) ::J (fl , Q) . '" o o i ~ ~:;; ,~fln ~"Eo :g.io _ I>> a..1~ en::J j:Ei;;i . I I I ?j ~ i\~il u~ul ~ ~cL~_, :'1 'II TiT,k:1 L~,.J ~I !! ,j ~~, .; -ill II; ~I i ! ?; '!I 'I ~ He '! .\ " " !! =.- ~ ~ ~~. !I ~. r I ,r'l I !I" I ii' 'II !! 1-2---'r;-~T-r :~ I ~~ 1- ~i~~ .~~tft : ~i ~ . ~, "'1,,11" I~ iT' k. l~" ~t >~ ~I ~l ' ( >~ ' \ ~ 1 ,\ ,! ~~~'~. ~. " 'I ! I i J .i., ~ I,> D! ~ti ' . ~ II ~ . , . I i~ ~ l r!; '~---r'--, --c , rIDY]' I,!I , . I I r:fJ~:-: ~'I 1",', - ,d n ,I ,!l 1- !" =-'-~"-2'~C . ' I . ", 111~';~;t'"iJ n--.L11-". ~, 3: ~ z r m < m r ~! , II I I I C "'C "'C m ::tI r m < m r . rD~~ . " .. 11'1 ., 'I !~l . N,;tii. ".:+.-+-:~ 3~ ~Jf~fj:__ ~~ --J II ~d-lti3 ~ -IS;c: ~ ~~ g m " CI "Tl(,/) ~ :;,; ~"QJ ;lJ .,:. 0.... "mo-l CG)~cnll I ""IJ)>)>C111 ~~;!riP'ztp~ en r-"'lJ' :::o~rG) ~ ]~ ~~~r"rn~~::J .... ~,,~~ ~~ II~ m '. " r 10 o .... " Gl m ".... 0, u.1::a "'N" D ..'" 80:lN p.,) 1'\)"" ...>.->. p." :....:.,. CXl()1~ (n en OIN 000>01 o:CI 01,. 00<:001 :"'N~OO~N I i '1::[ ~ 1 I .. t r~r .~;l :'. ~ , ~'O ' ~i~~ oi. ~I ~ VANDERPOL 0103/0105 east lupine drive aspen, colorado 81611 I ~ ~f. ~ , ~ ! i ill r ';fiNo'-- , ~n ~' " 10 "- " . ;Q ;;; _jW l; , I . I~ ~lld a " ;; ~~ :E :E n\J Ii " J i i . lco~-J . . l!i!pfllPi l'hdi'!rfJ JIW,'l;!:!! h;!' ! 'ii! 'jj < ,.,' Iil. Of " " . ", .:~^;;" J.;, . ~. -. ~." ~ o o o o fv O"J Q) " W o o f, f '" i'D i '" J ~ a ~ ~ a '" y 5 ~o ~~ . ~ o i'D ;:l! ", - ~ o ::l ~ . 0- 0> " ,.. . , ~ ce' :r ~ . .r: ,i , . i. 'ii ',( I.-i '.' '1' . " ~! ;: ~ ~ ~ l!,!,!l>!!"!', '~~d ~p}. ~ , ,"-! "- ' ~ .. ~. ~ 1 , "I!"'" -j" "H',]' , 1- !> -". ~ ita!l,,~il~~ n~r~1 o.q~ 1""'"/,0" :"-"!.,.,;~., ~~ ~,'!,\"l':1BO:~*I>"VJ,; ,r- r "C';!" p; {-' ; "" 1ll'lt> ^~,! ~ ~ "&#:1"i:. , ~ ~~..-; \'C" ,'~/ ~ ~/"": ~~M~~v.~e,", ,jj.,~fi~(~ '. "/ .--4 ~!5:I~ !it i~!~ ~ ~- '0'00 '<.>1<->.... L.!.. ., i l:g i~ I~ ~ 10 '10" ~ ~ ',:IE -, I VANDERPOL 0103/ 0105 east lupine drive aspen, colorado 81611 .MUNITY DE V I :I 'J\! SNT DEPAR.NT ,;li '-" ,I)i \--;j\( I I' Pi) Land Use: i;l,l d \ilr; .:; ',ii"I' . i ~ " i :), I:, j: II r I c' Ill, I '-'1 ~] :'Ijidll \'1['11' :; ~ 1!;IIJ1I:: .JII'JI"I' Referral Fees .[,; ! ), I ~: ' . . 11!!h I:' 11;;\ !"k II: q I. "Ii II' 11'.1, J)llli"III,11 i ii! Ill'" ~ I ,r ~ ' ,e -Iii" \111:.1:':<')[1 I"~, I" !-~i' 'JT'( 'it '\ {;I!,,_, Bui [ding Fees: i'!H',t!-, 'I'" 'II!" :)'1 111]1! "III] ,1'(11<-',' .i' Illli 11'" i, 1\1 ;,',. '\', I'<!]] i' !,:;I ,,' -'[,1),111'- I; !'!Tiil:!,)! l'["jll1l :1: f<!"iL'IW' I Hill \>'J"'! i "',lll"elIH!!! \'. i'"r l ;. '1< ');1I<..,JLd Other Fees: I "i" " "'l'I':,I,"-/)"!:,,,,[[ I'<:!!I [I-II 1"1' ! '; I' i" ) ::.~ I: I)! II . [ : (ji" i"I'\jlLI"I']III'[II:, }(I,J )':1. 1') !111IJdlt h " :', '('1:; '-;,IIP!)! Illl/l,U' J"'I TOTAL \.iI ,: ,I !:I ',~ !'i!( 11'1 il" Ill, 1'.' \' " )'U<:\1iI;' lill! j.; , I " ( Olll1tV II 3l~- 000027 31J' I)!'{ 'i'll L,\llrI.\1 J!), ]{j! lW loSe IS B1:2II' 81:2(' Ni\J\J[< :\Dfjh! f->f!()Nf ('HE('I .MUNJTY DE r ] :( -"i 'f'" ;N r DEPAR." ! .i:, \"i': 1 it; Pit k C)l nt r Laud Use: ii"~ 1-'! .! I,i ISo ;'i I"~ "'i 't, ,I);! 1 "'I~ I,', !1'liI !jl{'{ I;O'I'_'1111"il' Referral Fees: ['<T:li:: ":""'i' I;, :" i Ti,'ii it: ;/ j ii iii'"~ I, Hii Bui!din~ Fees: Ij ','I ',!II Ii,' I" ;i" ." I'!, il! I I I I: "'.i, 1.:,,\, \\ \' """ii I; ]["' 'Iii " 'T!' 'i' ,.., r,'I' " "I, ,ilil/I "\'! L", ,\1 I]-"!i,[! Otlwr Fees: ,;i ""i:, li:"1 "ie ,j' Jli 'Ii'!)! -:'1 "j I,:!lj( I'"~ 000028 ";",j i;"i',:, )"" TOTAL -G\\ -l5 ------' \-- ' /SO(ff) \) CI., 1l0\J,A 1<: I , ! ),') I H cv '\-Lcs k,\_v ,I; G 'f') G l'^SE/:'~'\l 1,-/ ,,7 DATE. v 'II (I'j L\'ITJ.\L"---~7