Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.boa.05.14II~IIIII~IIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIRI IIIIO a 913 5 005 02:33F D000 RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADNSTMENT GRANTING SETBACK VARIANCES FOR LOT 14, BLOCK 2, LITTLE ELK CREEK SUBDIVISION Resolution No. 14-2005 WHEREAS, Tom Nofziger, owner of109 Haystack Lane, is requesting an 18 foot Front yard setback variance and an 8 foot Side yazd setback variance for the construction of an addition to a single- family residence; and WHEREAS, 30 feet and 20 feet respectively is required on this 1.147 acre lot in the AFR-2 zone district; and WHEREAS, the parcel is described as Lot 14, Block 2, Little Elk Creek Subdivision; and WlffiREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 7-10.30, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Boazd of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been demonstrated. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that an 18 foot Front Yard Setback Variance and an 8 foot Side yard setback variance be granted for the construction of an addition to asingle-family residence as shown on Erdtibit A, due practical difficulties. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: August 2, 2005 The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado ATTEST: canna S. c of date~~ County Zoning Officer ~ ' i2 ~ °~ date Chauperson Pazcel ID#264504302015 OODU01 I IIIIII~IIiIi IIIIII IIIIII IIII VIII IIIIII III II~~~ ~~ii IIII s9 35 ao 02 33F SILV IR DRVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 0.00 0 0.00 j~ a~ s 1 ~Tv. 'o, eo, e /' is i/ L~ ~~ +ry~ ~v ~~\ .~~ r ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~-~ ,~` t ~ ~ _ _, •~~ .. -i ~ :~ .tS j', Y i is _~-,:. +. ~ i~~ ~~ I ~". ~ w ~~ ~+ I ~ `~~ ~~ m I,§i ,. ~ ryg9ry, i~ ~~m Ic ~a ~ ~ I~~ ',~ ~ii R"~ ',.. ti6~ 's I,I ~ ~~ f x m o G7 ° ° n z ~, o ~ a ~noC o va ~ ' r w ~7 W ~, °< i A tig,~ m ao ~ ~4 ' i m z P ~ a ~ II O i~ i N C m C O A N m A n m ~ 3 m ~ ~M m ~ =-IAOZ ~O d ~e G O rn N 1 F4 o.. rr~3 i s D ~ ~ rn (,) ~ Z rnrnW~ cnmrN C ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~rn " m~ ~ ~, cp .-y f n.~ ~ ~ E °- c ~ d m BP g ~ ~F~ o°i 2 F ~ '3e ~ m~~ 5 ~ ~m: S ~ fie. z Z ~as f?n ,e a I R~~ X 'I ~' ' V., ~I / r ~~'~~~n MINi1TES Meeting of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment August 02, 2005 Members Present: Rick Head, Co-Chair Jim Rifkin, Co-Chair Bob Throm Deanna Olsen Members Absent: Michael Cooper Staff Present: Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Officer and acting secretary Rifkin opened the meeting at 5:25pm. Case # 0-2005 Lipman, David Bloek 2, Lot 19, Pitkin Green Subdivision Todd Kennedy, Rob Russell, and Valerie Alexander were present to represent the applicant in his request fora 5 foot Front yard setback variance where 30 feet is required and a 3.5 foot height variance where 30 inches are allowed within a required setback for the construction of an entry canopy and retaining wall respectively. The Affidavit of Posting was submitted. No one from the public was present to comment. A letter of support from The Pitkin Green Homeowner's Association has been submitted Kennedy identified for the Boazd the subject lot on the Pitkin Green plat. He then presented a plan of the existing 5,000 squaze foot house which encroaches into the Front yard setback 5-8 feet over a horizontal distance of 45 feet. There doesn't appear to be a variance for this existing condition. A 1041 Hazazd Review building envelope was approved for this site because of the excessively steep slopes that exist from the edge of the building to the south. The request is for a cantilevered entry canopy on the north side of the residence, and a small site wall to be used as a planting platform. Because of the steep slopes, the architect proposes to lower the building platform five feet make the front edge of the building comply with the height limit. As viewed from Magnifico Road, the house appeazs to be primarily a one story structure. Lowering the building site created the opportunity to return the existing grade sun•ounding the house back to a more natural condition. The proposed site wall will reduce the slope from over 50% to about 35%, and will create a more natural condition which will enable successful revegtation and planting. Landscape azchitect, Valerie Alexander commented that trees azound the house are desired to help screen and soften the house. The current condition is too steep to allow a rootball to be successfully planted without creating individual wells for each tree. Also, the grade drops away so quickly that you lose the effect of the planting. n r,lnrry Rifkin asked if the wall was primarily retaining or esthetic and of what material will it be constructed? Alexander and Kennedy replied that it would be concrete blocking. Head asked the age of the house. Kennedy replied that the house was from the 1970's, and is being demolished because of severe water and structural damages that occurred under the previous owners. The house has been gutted and shored up so it won't collapse. The house is generally in a state of disrepair and is not salvageable. Rifkin asked if the canopy was just an architectural detail. Kennedy replied that it was an azchitectural element, but since it's on the north side of the house, it is also an important protective element. Olsen asked if the house could be pushed back. Alexander stated that the limitations of [he 1041 building envelope did not allow them to go further to the south. Head asked why this case number is O1? Schaffner responded that this was the first case to be submitted this yeaz, and that the applicant had requested that the application not proceed until this meeting. Head made a motion to approve the request as submitted due to topographic hazdships. Throm seconded the motion and all voted in favor, 4-0. 13-2005 Rockies Property, LLC Lot 72, Mountain Valley Subdivision AKA 17 Mountain Laurel Court Architects, Chip Houser and Seth Hmielowski, Craig Barnes and Mike Tanguay of Aspen Constructers were present to request an 18 foot Front Yard setback variance where 30 feet is required on this 15,741 sf lot in the R-15-A zone district for the construction of asingle-family residence. The Affidavit of Posting was submitted. Schaffner noted that no letters of objection were received; however, there were members of the public present to comment on this case. They included: Grafton Smith and Richazd Haberman of the Homeowner's Architectural Committee, Evan Benning, head of the Homeowner's Association, Vera Haberman owner of Lot 81, and Ann Fox, owner of Lot 74. Hmielowski presented the request. He stated that a 1041 Hazard Review building envelope has been approved which pushes the house away from slopes along Mountain Laurel Road, to the upper portion of the lot. Access is, therefore, taken from Mountain Laurel Court, which makes the property boundary along Mountain Laurel Court the Front yazd according to the Land Use Code. Had access been taken from Mountain Laurel Road, there would be no setback encroachment as the required Side and Rear yard setback is only 10 feet. The perceived front yazd, however, is from Mountain Laurel Road. Hmielowski also presented renderings of the proposed house and a site plan showing the areas of encroachment. ~~~~~~ Head asked what was the height limit. Schaffner replied that the height limit was 28 feet to the midpoint of the roof, and 33 to the ridge. Head noted that the house is proposed at 27 feet, and is therefore is lower than what is allowed. Rifkin opened the meeting to public comment. Grafton Smith, Evan Benning and Vera Haberman asked questions about the height and size of the house. Houser replied that the building components encroaching into the setback aze fairly low, one-story elements. The eave height is 10 feet and the peak is another 10-12 feet above that. The proposed floor azea is 3012 sf above grade, a 748 sf garage, and 2,374 sf below grade. The gross squaze footage allowed is 8,750 sf, while only 6,014 sf is being proposed. V. Haberman added that she thought the house was too close to the road. Richazd Haberman, commented that the Committee wishes to avoid setback variances because houses are getting too close to one another. Pam Fox stated [hat Mountain Laurel Court is a very dangerous curve and that she wasn't comfortable with the driveway location. It was a one lane road in a wooded azea, and she wasn't happy that the trees and lilac bushes would be removed. She didn't mind seeing a beautiful home from the road as much as she was concerned with safety issues. Hmielowski stated that the County Engineer, Bud Eylaz, was concerned about site lines because of the existing berms, but has approved the location of the driveway. Throm affumed that Eylar was the County's engineer and was responsible for fire and vehicular safety. If Eylaz approved the location of the driveway, it was his opinion, and thus the Boazd's opinion, that the driveway is safe. Hmielowski added that the plan was to keep as many trees as possible and to add more plantings to the existing berm. Riflcin commented that the Boazd's purview was pretty narrow and these were issues they could not consider. They were to determine whether Urere was a hardship. Throm made a motion to approve the request as submitted due to topographic hazdships. Head seconded the motion, and added that this house is not inconsistent with everything else being built in Mountain Valley. The fact they encroach in a setback on the east side towazd the street, minimizes the impacts to the neighbors on the west. The Boazd voted to approve the request, 4-0 12-2005 Riggs, Leonard and Peggy Lot 17, Block 2, Pitkin Green Subdivision David Johnston was present to represent the applicants in their request fora 20 foot Front Yazd setback variance where 30 feet is requued on this 15,741 sf lot in the R-15-A zone district for the construction of asingle-family residence. Johnson stated that he left the Affidavit of Posting in his office and would submit it before the end of the meeting. o~~UQ,r7 Attorney, Curt Sanders, representing Merl Dulien, the neighbor to the south, was present. No other members of the public were present to comment on the case. Johnson stated that the building envelope approved in the 1041 Hazazd Review pushed the house to the north because of steep slopes to the south. Other houses in the subdivision have also been pushed closer to the road. The requested variance is to allow the proposed house to be built over the existing stmcture and to m;n;m;ze any disturbance to the lower site. Head stated that this case is an exact duplicate as the Lipman case heazd earlier tonight. In fact there is only one lot between them. The argument is the same for both lots. Head made a motion to approve the request as submitted due to topographic hazdships. Throm seconded the motion. The Boazd voted to approve the request, 4-0. Johnson asked if Sanders wished to comment on the case. Sanders said his client supported the request. 14-2005 Nofziger, Tom Lot 14, Block 2, Little Elk Creek Subdivision AKA 109 Haystack Lane Tom and Renee Nofziger were present to request an 18 foot Front yazd setback variance where 30 feet is required and an 8 foot Side yazd setback variance where 20 feet is required for this 1.147 acre parcel in the AFR-2 zone district, for the constmction of an addition to asingle-family residence. Throm stated for the record that he knows the Nofzigers, however, he believes that he can be impartial. The Affidavit of Posting was submitted. There were no members of the public present to comment on the application. A letter from adjacent property owner, Phil and Lynn Eastley, supported the request. Tom Nofziger stated that he bought the house six yeazs ago and didn't realize that the house was located in the setback. Their garage is not big enough to hold two Subaru Outbacks, let alone any "stuff'. They wish to add on to the garage. The house has been there since the 1977 and there aze fully mature aspen trees that are 15 feet tall. He distributed color photos of the site to the Boazd. There is about 18-20 feet from the property line to the edge of the road. The Eastley's house is located to the back of their lot, and the Nofziger house is located to the front of their lot, so the Eastley's have given their support to the request. Throm noted that the configuration of the roads as they enter this property is a hardship of practical difficulties since it is a condition created by the subdivision. Head made a motion to approve the request as submitted due to practical difficulties. Throm seconded the motion. The Boazd voted to approve the request, 4-0. Schaffner asked the Board if they would all be present for the September 6s' meeting, the day after Labor Day. and all stated that they would be in town. 000006 .. No minutes from the July meeting were available for review/comment. There being no further business before the Board, Head made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Throm seconded the motion, and it passed, 4-0. Respectfully submitted, OS arena S. S ha freer, D to oning Officer Appr ~d: -~-c~5 Date Co-Chair 000007 PITHIN COUNTY B0.4RD OF ADJLiST:~IENT c [ Application Form 4 aC ~/~2 DATE 7 a J }~,pp11~t~ Ce~l ~"l0 -I~P(,l,/~ REPRESENTAT(`IVE I~61eL `~' (dV1R V~IO ~S e/ PHONE ~~~ / ~'~~ E-MAIL ''~1~?T-(5Q/~ L ~(s~c<t~ (.t1M ' FAX MAILING ADDRESS ~1U~ '~V.I~ Cll. IJM,L' : J~16~,JY~IGC( ~A) P~~„Y~- OWiVER ~()t~ NOt]'1~~ ~ PHONE - ~33 MAILING ADDRESS ))~ ~ f~ (,a C(~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lt1 OCU~, rZL `+ U e r k S/ ! „~ A SUBIECT PARCEL ADDRESS ~~ 1 ~/(17nr; ~t, (nn P', ~I ildl I MAG ~` ,!,( ~~n~4' PARCEL ID ff# Z (v1L( '(J~3 -U 2-0 ( ZONE DISTRICT ~'~ f• LOT SIZE l i I ~ 1 Q(~'Pi SIGNATURE ~ , ~,~~a~ (To be completed by the Zoning Department) CASE # -Z(PJ S Requesting: ~' Front Yazd Setback Variance, where ~~' is required. ' Reaz Yazd Setback Variance, where ' is required. ~' _ Side Yazd Setback Variance, where ~' is requred. ' _ Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. 'Height Variance, where ' is allowed Comments: I ,~ e Application filed 7 -S-G 5 Refer to L E(. H fl ~c Date of Meeting ~(~, -Z-p S Notices Mailed 7-/Z-P~ Zoning Official's _.~~~ '~ ~ ,,_..p < ~'C"---~ Secretary ' O I'/~1G.\l D~FoemaNlhin Planning\pihinl6oaWminlpn bo<\applicdoc ..-.r-,••-•i--~~ ~~~ ~~-~,~ r+nrc~rt}.rraz ~ noizouo ~:: '#'CQp,~3~ - CA'$~~NID~14-2005 CARE NAiNE; Nofriger, Tom PLIVE#[ Joanna Schaffner PRQJ ADDR: 109 Haystack Lane CASE-TYA:' Fronl and Side Yard Variance gggpg=~" L7YftM1APP. Tom Nofziger 109 Haystack Lane `C!S/Z' Snowmass, CO 816 pR[~ 927-7633 RAP: ..._.. AbR. ~ ..._.... P!)N F`kE$'ONE: $568 #19765 FEES RC.1+D, $568 #19765 REI?fvRRAi:B ttEF:~ ~ Pul~:~ ,; A~IYi'DA"rE ..REV BObY ' ;pH 8/2/05 BOA yes 7/24/05 ~ ' REMpRK$ public notice to jj/JSS//cc to Little Elk Creek HOA 7/13/05gt oouoos 07/12/2005 16:42 9709272048 PAGE 02102 • July 4, 2005 Pitkin County Board of Adjustment To Whom It May Concern: Tom purchased the property at 109 Haystack Lane, Snowmass, CO, six years ago (Legal Description; Lot 14, Block 2, Filing 2, Little Elk Creek Village Subdivision, Pitkin County). Unknown to Tom, the existing house was long ago built within the current county setbacks. According to a survey completed two years ago, the back comer of the attached garage foundation is 10.5' from the side property line (20' side yard setback) and the front comer of the attached garage foundation is 26.2' from the front property line (30' front yard setback). We are requesting a variance to expand the garage to 25' x 25' so that the new construction including a two foot roof overhang will not be closer than 12' from the side and front yard property lines. The existing back corner and structure of the gazage will remain where it is and will be used for storage. Our hardship is due to the fact that the attached garage is already within the county setbacks so changing the footprint in any direction will result in a setback variance. The existing gazage at 20.0'x 23.3' is not large enough to accommodate two standard vehicles and enough storage to raise a family. Mature landscaping, that is at least fifteen years old, mitigates nearly all of the visual impact of the new proposed garage (see attached photos). Also, it is approximately 18'from the property line to the paved subdivision road, which helps to mitigate the setback variance. Further, we have attached a letter of support from Lynn and Phil Eastley, our neighbor closest to the vaziance, with this application. hi addition, the homeowners association has been presented this package they do not see a problem with the requested variance. Your consideration in approving this much-needed variance is appreciated. S~in~cwerely, ~~ ~C/ l~ 7 1 U ~ Renee & Tom Nofziger 109 Haystack Lane Snowmass, CO 81654 000010 i O ~Jb l s°do~~'s dd , ---- £'~Z i ~------ '~~ N '. C9 N \~ .~~ ~~ O ---- `~ ~, r w ~ ~ o ~~~ . ~ Q ~ a. a~ ; moo'. Z o o' °~~ ~. ~ ~ N d ~ i ~ Oi ~~ --- ~-------- J S'Z N'' ~s~ ~J O~sp ©d S' a 000011 July 4, 2005 Pitkin County Government Board of Adjustment Aspen ,Colorado RE: Request for Side-yazd and Front-yard Variance Mr. and Mrs. Tom Nofziger Lot 14, Block 2, Filing 2 Little Elk Creek Subdivision Gentlepersons, We are the owners of Lot 15, Block 2, Filing 2, which is contiguous to Mr. and Mrs. Nofziger's lot on the North side of Lot 14. We fully support the Nofziger's request for a variance to allow the expansion of their gazage and the addition of a second story. Our home at 97 Haystack Lane was constructed at the back of our lot and Mr. Nofziger's proposed gazage addition has zero impact on our home. Sinc e Philip nd Lynn Eastley 000012 .~ ~_ V 3 ~ ~ ~ /~ '" ' ~ / N % // / N b i \ ~ / / // i UU \ iw N ~n / // S~ / ~\JI ~ / / ~ ~_.., §~ ~~ / i--. a ~ 8~ o ~~~__-, f I is i 1'~`. i... i .i ,;~~ J_ Ali ~+ `~ ~ ~~ ~_ ~ ~ L \ ~. .~~.I ~`\ ~ et Y ~ O u o _.. i E ~y ~WY N w&3S O °G~g 1 ~Y v . ~ N ~ ~ ~ g Y V I ~ m f- s ;~ W r~ ~ o i ~~~ I ~ d ~ - "' _- ; o o rn ~~ o ___ Y 9 ~~ ~ i ~_i ~/ ~.~r ~ ~J,.. 0®0013 ~ ' =' m ~ 1_~ :, r.. /; ~ ~, % / / , / / / / w Z a J Y U Q F N } Q 2 O ... ~ ~I -~ ~ ~~ I I 0 m a 0400? ~ y ~~ ~~~ ~~ S~~ ~~~.~ ~ ~«54 1 ~• ~ -4 ~_ ooooi5 ~_, ~. ~!;r~a ~r~6; _, ~~ . Renee & Tom Nofziger 109 Haystack Lane Snowmass, CO 81654 Property Leal Description: Lot 14, Block 2, Filing 2, Little Elk Creek Village Subdivision, Pitkin County 00001 s Renee & Tom Nofziger 109 Haystack Lane Snowmass, CO 81654 List of all adiacent property owners: Lynn & Phil Eastley 097 Haystack Lane Snowmass, CO 81654 Brown Rice 106 Haystack Lane Snowmass, CO 81654 Beth & Kent Blackmer 097 Haystack Lane Snowmass, CO 81654 Suzie & Rick Knezevich 135 Haystack Lane Snowmass, CO 81654 Holly Timms & John Corcoran 036 Davidson Lane Snowmass, CO 81654 00001? Yahoo! Maps -Snowmass, CO 81654-9310 • vahool MY Yahool Mail ~',1;HCIC~r L4GAL sian I" •n New User? ~ig_n_Up Maps Yahoo! Maps -Snowmass, CO 81654-9310 C: Back to Map * 109 Haystack Ln Snowmass, CO 81654-9310 YxHOO!~ ~c o° a`ag Qa O. s~ Nf// `7 Haystack Ln B ~~ N R wt11 b~ ~b `~~S~o~ ~,pfn~ d ;a !a r' 0 ~,a ~t0g~ GaQ~p~ .. ~100m 200 ft 02DD5 Yahoo! Inc • Page 1 of 1 se,~~+. ?he hJe6 ©zoo5 NXNTEQ w nen using any driving directions or map, It's a good idea to do a reality check and make sure the road still exists, watch out for construction, and follow all traffic safety precautions. This is only to de used as an altl in planning. P IUUU18 tf ~.v 1 v ~- ~ _._ Copynght p 2005 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. pp Pnyacy Policy -Terms of Servic~e I- COpYnght/~P POIICy - Ydh00' Maps Terms Of Use - Hylp - Ad Feedback ot-.f, 0(~W~JA~I~ TIb~~ - ~wv. IQF~ cfi ©I~ S~tU~MtitJ ~noco Oti ~ S~ow~t~J~ c~el~ ~~~ 5~ ~ f5 ~Att{s -~ ~~ s~~n' r~N ~5h~- ~ ~ ~P~ I c~,~ t~ti~l _ Su ~•S~~ Iwn rtS~i~ t~ ~t~(e ~ Jue~UlflU-, ._ of -f ~+- T -I,,~t~ Ie~F ~ ~.~- ~c~t..d T -h,~„ 1~~~ - ~Uti ~~fkl~ ~~ ~S IM--~I,,~~dy ~ ~tvt~f~- rt ~'l~~" ttp:// aps.y oo.com/pmaps?hame=&ed=SObhxup_OTpfLus'yn3_kt_G_J3BPPAUmFYiz... 7/5/2005 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Front and Side Yard Setback Variances for Lot 14, Block 2, Filing 2, Little Elk Creek Subdivision (Case 14-2005) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, August 02, 2005, to begin at 5:30pm, or as soon thereafter as the conduct of business allows, in the Commissioner's Meeting Room in the Courthouse, 506 East Main Street, Aspen, before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, to consider an application submitted by Tom Nofziger of 109 Haystack Lane, Snowmass, Colorado, 81654, to request a 18 foot Front Yard setback variance where 30 feet is required, and an 8 foot Side Yard setback variance where 20 feet is required on this 1.147 acre pazcel in the AFR-2 zone district for an addition to asingle-family residence. The State Parcel Identification Number for this property is 2645-043-02-015. For further information contact Joanna Schaffner at the Pitkin Community Development Department, (970) 920-5105. Pitkin County Boazd of Adjustment Published in The Aspen Times Weekly on July 24, 2005. Pitkin County Account No. 002.02 ~~~~~_~ 0 G O G N n y S9~ it , ~'~. ~y , 10,. moo;. F ~Lti~d 00 ~ M~ qk ilti. ~~~ `~ f, i ~ ; ~'> ~'~ .~ "x s.. ~~ ,, ,~ ,r ~ _ N ~a• ; ,:. ., o', ~ ~a~ ~ P ~ ~ . . w m ~ ~~ cl w ~~~e _. ~ x~ r` ~ i 0 x=. ~,__ t n _ -_ ~ "fiY, ~' ~i M ~s~~q ' ..~ ~° ~9 /P; y P ~m~ti~ ~~. q. q~~ i ~, DnvN- 2 ~Nr^:~ 'A"y~yz c~~ ~~ mOOvZ nm «~m~p4Cmm T J ~ ~D `~z 3~0 y~z~a p - OZ Ll. m-i ~ -1 vm mK OPDmOm Zpp m rn m ~==oo o=~~= p~~ ~ m O O aKF~~ SO° O `/. 1 p D ~ m / ~ my Zm m p~N2'~ yy~ < C Y/ C ^ m Z 2Am ~ ~mm~0 cm $ A y 0 n D ~ `^ ~ a D° y ~ fOai~F Ac _ m V O V Eoc m ~ m 'fir m ~ P Ll ~.y 1~U) _ '^ ' N ym y O m ~ Op . ^ ~ V O n v ~ O C V~1~ m_mi p0 "~ ~m om_cm H 0D 3i~ O T _ w w DNZm O P 3 mm.., A D^VI W O r n Dn ~ ~~p~> ZyZ 4 ]]JJ X ~ D o;mc n m~p~m y 5 - Ny ~ a m p `z y i~ n ~ a o Vp ~ p '. i $g PAm r y /v m c, m 2m Z(lE D D AO ~~ p z D 30~C Imti rj p I Ii Ommll~ ~3m ° 00 ~ Z p ~m~m 'TJ zbo~°z z i+gn m O~ /^'~ .. ~ wNON ~ °o PO °~~ ~ A U/ ~ 3 p' o ~ m 'am °°° mp . z c c ymm9 C17 D _ m" n ~ o ~ D , „ mN m y N m 0 oFzsz 'm^~o 3 mxpnr Dzop • ~Z u ~ ~~«~ m~ ~m ZN ~~ ~ z Cyyy m P U. mmmmLpl 32A m 0 OO~p= ~yi r m~N °y = ym3zP Amp ~pT ~ I y ~\ \ p i Sfi VW Y:'2 L~ . ° 3 rn ~ rn _ -~~o?- _- -~ ~ ~ O 1l ' o ___ _____ / \ O / \ N ~) ~ T 1 1 1 ~ r H D ° ~ ~ z rn ~ rn W (~ rn ~ O C ~o ~ T rn f ,~ ~ ~ N ~ rm- m ~ ~ m < o n Z ~ ° ~ O~ ~ r~ a -~p ~ m m ~ ~ p D 9 ~ ~--~ P m z p O s p s N °ox ~ w<~f fD IA i _ ~ ~ ~ rn pZ o~N z G Q /A y~_ S l / m°m m m T r z~~ O 0 ~ ~~ T ~ Om ozi ° z V ~ mD ~~~ ~ H oDp mom _ O Z a~Da ° ozz mmo o Ay `Lyv ~J • I~ O Z / / .~ 1 r~ • County of Pitl:in ~ AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY POSTING } ss. OF A VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE State of Colorado } THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The Luldersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: I, ~,~~J I Vb ,being or representing an Applicant before the Pitlcin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and th~a(t was osted and visible continuously from the ~ day of ~~ , 20 ~7, the sud sign p - ~ 20~ ust be ed f r at least nine 9 full da s to the ~_ day of - ~ ~ (n'I P () y before the hearing date). ~ ~~ Jl/l _ . ~ Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of _, 20~ by ~~/nf~ ~ i~ u C u.~~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. ~~•~1Y Term To Expire My Commission expires: ~IiaY 31, 2009 ~~ ~: ~ Notary~Public's Signature -" Address ODUU~1 C AGENDA PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT August 02, 2005 5:30 P.M. Pitkin County Courthouse NEW BUSINESS: Caseload: 01-2005 Lipman, Lot 19, Block 2, Pitkin Green Subdivision AKA 204 Magnifico Road Requesting a 5 foot Front Yard setback variance where 30 feet is required, and a 3.5 foot height variance where 30 inches is allowed within a required setback, for the construction of an entry canopy and retaining wall respectively. The lot contains .725 acres and is zoned R-30. 12-2005 Riggs, Leonard and Peggy Lot 17, Block 2, Pitkin Green Subdivision Requesting a 20 foot Front Yard setback variance where 30 feet is required for this .74 acre lot in the R-30 zone district for the construction of asingle-family residence. 13-2005 Rockies Property, LLC Lot 72, Mountain Valley Subdivision AKA 17 Mountain Laurel Court Requesting an 18 foot Front Yard setback variance where 30 feet is required on this 15,741 sf lot in the R-15-A zone district for the construction of asingle-family residence. 14-2005 Nofziger, Tom Lot Block, Little Elk Subdivision AKA Requesting an 18 foot Front Yard setback variance where 30 feet is required and an 8 foot Side Yard setback variance where 20 feet is required for this 1.147 acre parcel in the AFR-2 zone district, for the construction of an addition to asingle-family residence. Minutes: O No minutes for you to review this month. O PLEASE CONTACT JOANNA AT 920-5105, WHETHER OR NOT YOU CAN ATTEND THIS MEETING. O~OU~2 ~~/ ~~ C`MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART~T 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5526 Pitkin County Land Use: G __._ 172 Board of Adjustment ~~ 159 County Land Use Code 173 Deposit 174 Flat Fee 162 Zoning and Sign 16g Public Notice 160 Planning Enforcement 175 Hearing Officer Referral Fees: 210 Airport LUCO1 County Clerk 211 County Engineer 194 Environmental Health 208 Historic 198 Housing 190 Land Management 209 Redstone HPC 206 Wildlife Officer Building Fees: 170 Board of Appeals 135 Building Code Sales 105 Building Permit 100 Contractor License 120 Electrical Permit 195 Energy Code Review 115 Mechanical Permit 150 Plan Check 110 Plumbing Permit 130 Reinspection 151 Aspen Sanitation 152 AVFD Fire Marshal 158 BFD Fire Marshal Other Fees: 155 Use Tax 165 Copy PZ005 Master Plan Copy Performance Deposit 185 Park Dedication 186 , Parking Cash in Lieu IS GIS Requirements B1202 Road Impact Fee ~-~ B1203 School Impact Fee TOTAL -~.r U/l J NAME: ADDRESS/PROJECT: CHECK# CASE/PERMIT#:1 ~ ' -fit ~!~ #OFCOPIES: DATE: ~ INITIAL: