Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.boa.81.36 Clark Smyth moved that the following be adopted: BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTf1ENT OF THE COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 81-36 Bill & Gale Burton, Maroon Creek WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjorninq property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant's request for a 90' frontyard setback variance and a 15' sideyard setback variant Additional conditions or restrictions: WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. Joe Zanin seconded the adoption of the foregoing Resolution. The roll having been called, the vote was as follows: Bill Mason - yes Dottie Fox - yes Paul Krausch - yes Clark Smyth - yes Joe Zanin - yes Robert Throm - yes Kandi Shaffran - yes The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: September 15, 1981 The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado Attest: cum Secret y ,~~ ~Gy Chairman ({}ft11~ ~] ~1PP[AL TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT County of Pitkin /~-f~ / GJ7.Si (7 ~ ~ ~~ 1nn<L Date ~, C~ 19~ Case # ~l - 3CP Applicant t 1y~~ I.~,~~fn ~ ~ )_ Address~Ti~~~'~~~5 Owner IJ.L~L_i=._~T1P C Ir ~iV1 Address ~Y3X 25~ 7 Location of Property Attached) ~. Any pertinent rata must accompany this application, and will be made a part of this Case No. The Board may return this applicatior, if it does not contain ail the facts in question. "Applicant's description of proposed variance showing justification: ' ~ ~/c- TL /~l~ /~cizc=fy'-c:~.~7L S'~~~~'c~' 6~ Th//S .~T ~f-rJ/~ ~v /iJ cr roi.~1 t~ zS'~ i f3,~c-~ t~i.J~ J /T1 ~ir3 S' f3c c~r2/c l!-~!/°C-sS /TIC/C ~O LL7 C ~ 7~-~ THC r7ci LASE ~ ~O ~~ S!f" / l s .s ~_- y' /-~-[_ ~-- c ~ T79c ~ ~ T /~4C,~ ~2 EC; jlJf'/zG~`://~ic~%S l t Applicant Signature Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Building Inspector to forward this application~tJO the Board Qf Adjustj~nepnt and reason for n/ot granting a building permit: [ [~/i/ ~l~C~ ~ ~- 1 / Y~~"~'~ ~~ ~.f~ ~ LC ~N L(. L LI GL YL L~ ~ t I.i~~L e~ G, d ~ .d ~~ "t t. ~ A ~ L ~ Building Insp. Signature ~.,, ~.F ~,. ..:u,- ~#~ permit rejected: g i 6' ~" ~ Board Decision ' Application Filed: ~ '/z" ~~,' Date: #~i l ed Secretary, Board of Adjustment ~z5 I I r, Et1AF'A ;E' AIiTU~1T•TCPJT • 1. $25.OD application fee 2. A list of all your ad,)acent property owners and their mailir~ addresses, (Which may be found in the.ASsessor~s OfTice) • 3• Plot Plan ~ . '1t1e above is due 2 wee:cs before the scheduled meeting by 11:00 a.m. y•. Also a sign Est be posted 9 days before the meeting stating: ,~ . NOTICE OF'FiEAttTP1G ~~ ' . EOANO~ OP AIkNSIT?~31T ...,. ' . Lo be hold at Pitkin County Courthouse . - 5:15 P.Pi. in Y.he County Corrmtiissioners Fin. ~~ ~ ` , 1919, to consider a ~a'~gnce • for owner ,~;;~ ~' a rrdt'Yance. ~ ~' You or your agent will need to be present at the hearing to present your case. P ~ . ~~~~~LL~ STAN MATHIS architecture and planning p.o. box 1984 aspen, Colorado 81612 ~-is~ c ~ ~~~ c~~~~" prc~pe~~ cat.~v~e.~~ . ~~r~~ ~©Ylr~ ~,~~,~I a~ C~I-N~ ~m~ ~~~~x ~-~ ~}~~ ~ Cc3~a ~ Bi~OtZ ~oocr~4a r~~s~ :~~~ ;in.TU~^r~~Frr a 1. $25.00 application fee 2. A list of all your adjacent property oomers and their mailing addresses, (which may be found in the Assessor's Office) 3• Plot Plan , ~e above is due 2 wee?cs before the scheduled meeting by 11:00 a.m. Also a sib must be posted 9 days before the meeting stating: NGI'ICE OF'1•IG • EGARD OF AATUSTi•1E~IT - to be held at Pitki.n Count? Coy sthcu:.e - 5.15 P•T`?• in T.he Coi,mty Comni.ssioners tin. on = 1.9; 9, to consider a var~,nce for ovmer `,•,) fora variance. . . - ~. - You or your agent will need to be present at the hearing to present your case. 00~~~~J ,~ HEI:ORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves rax w c. r. xorcxa e. e. a ,. cn. PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUST?SENT SPECIAL "4EETING September 15, 1981 Members Present: Bill Mason, Chairman Dottie Fox Paul Krausch Clark Smyth Joe Zanin Associates: Bill Lukes - Robert Throm Kandi Shaffran Meeting was called to order by Bill '4ason, Chairman. Dottie Fox made a motion to accept the minutes as mailed, :~4otion was second, All in favor to approve the minutes. Leon Norton, Lot #17, Double K S/D 81-34 ' requesting a 23' frontyard setback variance to construct an '. addition to existing residence. Leon Norton was representing himself. Leon explained that prior to downzoning ile would be { able to. construct this addition but now the setback is 100'. ~ Under the original zoning the setback was 75'. Bill Mason wanted to know if Leon would be within the covenance originally set. ~~ It was agreed that it would be. Bill wanted to know if the floor area ratio would be within its limit. Patsy Newbury assured ~ the Board that it would be. Paul Krausch moved to grant the i variance based on the fact that the property has been downzoned. + Dottie Fox second the motion. „4otion passed. Edward Lewis, Lot 20,_ Little Texas S/D Woody Creek 81-35 requesting a 20' frontyard setback variance and a 19' sideyard setback variance to construct a single .family residence, Roger Kerr was there to represent ?~1r. Lewis. He explained that the size of the lot makes it difficult to maintain the required setback. It would leave a 15' lot to build a house. Bill Mason wanted to know if a sign was posted anywhere on the property, Roger Kerr stated that to his knowledge no sign was posted. Bill ]4ason recommended that this case be tabled till the 29th of September. None of the adjacent property owners have objected to the Board. Bill 94ason questioned the Board as to whether they would like to hear the case and make a motion at the next meeting or hold the entire case until then. Paul Krausch felt it would be better if they waited to hear the case until the next meeting. Case was tabled until September 29, 1981. N~ 5t1 DOOU00 1QJ Leaves EMM L C. E. MO[CI1 EL ~. B. f L. G0. September 15, 1981 Boai•d of Adjustment Page 2 Bill & Gale Burton, maroon Creek 81-36 requesting a 90' frontyard setback variance and a 15' sideyard setback variance to construct a single family residence. Patsy Newbury corrected the request to be a 10' frontyard setback variance. Stan Mathis was there to represent the Burton's along with Bill Burton. Stan explained that they could not place the structure any further back because of a 45% slope down into the river. They have gotten approval for their septic system and if they were to move the house they would not have an area for that. Bill Burton also mentioned that there were trees on the lot that he was trying to build around, Clark Smyth made a motion to approve the variance as presented on the topographical map which is approximately 1~' front and sideyard variance based on the topographical considerations and the odd shape of the lot. Joe Zanin second the motion. One of the adjacent property owners was there to make sure that the trees were not cut down, Bill :Mason replied that that was the reason Mr, Burton was trying to get a variance change so that he could leave the trees. Patsy also stated that a permit was needed to cut the trees. Bill Mason called for a vote if there were no other questions, b4otion was passed, Jay F. Halliday, El { i requesting a 80' fr setback variance to No one was there to until September 29, REC~JRD OF PROCEEDfNGS Rancho Deluxe S/D Lot #2 Sec 9 81-37 ntyard se construct represent 1981, so tback variance and a 10' sideyard an underground storage building. this case. The case was tabled that Mr. Halliday could be present. A motion was made by Joe Zanin to adjourn the meeting, Paul Krausch second the motion. Motion passed. Respectfully Submitted, ~~,C2.-( c~1 i~ .'r/. ir1 , a ~~lf./~GC~'m C" ~~~tlor'!?"l Secretary ~Yilliam Mason ooooo~ x° 5i ..,