The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.92.13 PITRIN COIINTY BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT DATE Z 3 I~ CASE ~ /~~/ APPLICANT r ~' V I~'k~~ wr PHONE ~Zp~ ~~IS MAILING ADDRESS 1~ ~ (~ "~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ -~wr ulr~`^ ~ S~o(~ OWNER ~ /mil/ h ~r PHONE q c~ I~ ' ICJ l~ MAILI G ADDRESS CN ~7 / ~ ~ l ~ //~~ / alfu~-r (.t! PJ~6(~ LOCATION OF PROP RTY 50 (~ t /J ~ `-f~ PI ~~ Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may return this application if it does not contain all the facts in question. Applicant Signature (TO be completed by the Zoninq Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: 5' Zone District Reque$ting: Lot Size ' Front Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ~76~~ ~ Height Variance, where /z ~ is required. Square Feet where a maximum of sq. ft. is allowed. Other: Zoning Official ~._:y~eexx:~ ~,~~ l ~ .. . Application filed ~~'~~ d' Parce°~ ID No.~~~~ - -O( -O,?„Z Date of Meeting 3 - 3C- 9 ~ Notices Mailed ~ -l 5,4~/ Secretary Refer Resolution to Building Department ; _ ; Yes ~ _~ No ODUU01 ~ 2~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADJACENT PROPERTY O~PNERS BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers, City Hall, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: owner: Name and Address of Applicant: Property Location or Description: March 3, 1992 at 5:15 p.m. City Hall, 1st Floor Council Chambers James & Diane Otis, Jr. Jim Curtis 117 South Monarch Aspen, CO 81611 Lazy O Ranch 1150 Capitol Creek Road, Snowmass Requesting approval for a 7'6" height variance, where 12 feet is the limit per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, to legalize an existing cabin to be deed restricted to an employe dwelling unit. Approval of this variance would allow the structure to be 19'6" in height. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X THE ITKIN COUNTY 0 OF ADJUSTMENT Cind L. Christensen, Secretary UOOUO,~ Snowmass Llamas and Alpacas Farm Employee Dwelling Unit Building Height Variance Application January 31, 1992 Submitted to: Pitkin County Board of Adjustment c/o Pitkin County Planning Office 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-5090 Applicant: James, Jr. and Diane Otis Julie and Bob Congdon 1150 Capitol Creek Road Snowmass, CO 81654 (303) 920-1995 Planner: Jim Curtis Curtis & Associates 117 S. Monazch Street Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 920-1395 ooonna ` The Snowmass Llamas and Alpacas Farm Employee Dwelling Unit was approved by the Pitkin County Boazd of Commissioners on February 11, 1992. The approval is to legalize and deed- restrict anexisting 1,874 sf. cabin to an employee dwelling unit. The cabin is located on the Snowmass Llamas and Alpacas Farm property in the Capitol Creek Valley generally across the road from the Little Elk Creek Subdivision. The property is 39 acres and zoned RS-30 PUD. The property has approval for a new principal residence and the cabin is therefor an accessory structure as determined by the Planning Office. A location map of the property and photographs of the cabin aze attached hereto. A 7'6" building height variance is necessary because the existing cabin is higher than that permitted by Code for an accessory structure. The height of the cabin is 23'0" to top-of-roof and 19'6" to mid-point of roof. The permitted Code height for an accessory structure is 12'0" to mid-point of roof. Granting the variance will eliminate the hazdship of tearing the cabin down to comply with the building height for an accessory structure. Granting the variance will also the cabin to be legalized and used as an employee dwelling unit which is consistent with the County Commissioners approval of the cabin and the County's goal of encouraging employee dwelling units throughout the County. The cabin is existing and no changes or additions are proposed, therefor granting the variance will not result in any detriment to the public good or alter or impair the intent and purpose of the zoning district regulations and the policies and regulations of the Code. As part of the County Commissioners approval of a previous employee dwelling unit, the Commissioners has asked the Planning Office to bring back a proposed Code Amendment that will address the building height problems of employee dwelling units as accessory structures. However, the Code Amendment will not be processed and adopted prior to coming before the Board of Adjustment which is the only procedural way to address this difficulty at this time. MLCr_e!laneous ApplicAtion Iter is List Of Adjacent Property Owners -submitted separately Owner's Consent Letter -submitted separately Property Survey -not provided as a setback variance was previously granted for the structure. 000004 .. ~ ; ; ,.. APPENDIX B EMPLOYEE DWELLING iJNIT APPLICATION SNOWMASS LLAMAS & ALPACAS FARM ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS This list of adjacent property owners has been compiled from the records of the Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer offices as of July 25, 1991 and is complete and correct to the best knowledge of the applicant. Allen H. Adger Bruce Anderson Suite 106 0096 Little Elk Creek Avenue 201 N. Mill Street Snowmass, CO 81654 Aspen, CO 81611 Maurice Couturier William J. Tofany 0100 Little Elk Creek Avenue P.O. Box 9151 Snowmass, CO 81654 Aspen, CO 81612 Kevin Maloney Cindy Lea Seazs Route 2, POB 85 P.O. Box 574 Warrenton, VA 22186 Snowmass, CO 81654 James, Jr. and Diane Otis Maztin and Debra Leonazd 400 Skokie Blvd. P.O. Box 536 Northbrook, IL 60062 Aspen, CO 81612 Anita M. Iannone Randy and Diane Cote P.O. Box 5157 P.O. Box 453 Aspen, CO 81612 Snowmass, CO 81654 Patricia L. Adger Michael Vernon P.O. Box 407 117 S Spring Street Snowmass, CO 81654 Aspen, CO 81611 Lazy-O Ranch Homeowners' Assoc. Thomas F. Smith c/o James Otis, Jr. P.O. Box 587 400 Skokie Blvd. Aspen, CO 81612 Northbrook, IL 60062 Hugh A. Roberts P.O. Box 307 Snowmass, CO 81654 ;tr, 000005 January 31, 1992 !~ Julie Otis Congdon Lazy O Ranch. I I50 Capi[al Creek Road, Snowmass, Colorado 81654 Telephone: 303-927-43 V R'1X. 303 927-4058 Pitkin County Board of Adjustment C/O Pitkin County Planning Office 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado - 81611 RE: Owner's Consent to Application and Representation Building Height Variance Application FSnployee Dwelling Unit Snowmass Llamas and Alpacas Farnl 1150 Capitol Creek Road Dear Board of Adjustment: As the owner of the above referenced property, I hereby consent for Mr. Jim Curtis to submit and represent said application before the Boaxri of Adjustment. Please feel free to give me a call on any questions. 000(l~~ d; -I ' I ~ ~~ -~ ~~ ~.~~~ ~rl ~~ ~, ~ -,~~_, '~-1 I' _ eel ~ ~~(( I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ `J //~/` {I ~ ~,~ '`i ,~~ 1 ~(' ~ ~~~ `~ Leo= 1 1 \ I I \tv T ~ ~( O ~ J(I ~ v I "J'~ ~ I ~ ~~j= j~ n° I,~ ~ ~~x ~ ~- yH II~' - ~`/ ii ,~ I' % --'Eli ''o / nl~ ~ )I ~'i -L1Etle ~ ~~ /~ %/ ~ ~//t%/ ME VIHa ~~ a i ~ .y, I ~ I ~ i ~~ rl I r / ;ql~l~\ I ~E` i H ~~l= ,firs -- \T`- \= I f'~~y.: )a9,r. 1 ,~ ,I I ~, d, ~~y, ~ _ ~, ~~ ,. ' / // . ` ~' l 1 ~i`' ~ 4 ~~ _ S eke i ~Capit~01 ~~ ~ ~ ~ / / CCCCIC,' ~ a v Road ; I o ~ ~; _ ; ," ~ s=. y 3 t :.:< esl "', '` .~ .'~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .' ///~ ~ ~ /QO ~, ~- ~~ ~~ ~ _ / __ r nor. t ~~n ~ I (/ r~ ;~ ~ eJSi~. ~ ti _ 111 / II 6)j ~ I I .,_J~_ I//~ \ } ___ /J ~ _ % n~ l /\\ I /~ ~~ Location Map Snowmass Llamas and Alpacas Farm U. S . G. S. North 000007 a ''` a ~g ~~. B 9 g R S a u~ ~_ U h U Ct c V & 44 5 ~ U ~° o U O ~~_ g ~~eA C f~~i~ ~°yy~~ d`8~ s d !'~.~ 8 ~ ~E $ ~ ~e 0000{8 ,^~ "SPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE "- _ ~ _ ~ - ~ =_ 130 South Galena Street _ ` ~~ Aspen, Cobrado 81611 - - (303).920.5090 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES clly OON3 ~ -63250-134 ~ '-~ GMP/CONCEPTUAL E3270-136 GMP/FINAL -63280-137 ~ SUB/CONCEPTUAL -63300-139 ~ SUB/FINAL - ~~ -63310-140 _ ALL 2STEP APPLICATIONS -63320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00115 -63340-163 ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL County 00113 -63160-126 GMP/GENERAL X3170-127 GMP/DETAILED -63180-128 GMP/FINAL -63190-129 SUB/GENERAL -63200-130 SUB/DETAILED -63210-131 SUB/FINAL X3220-132 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS -63230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS -63450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00113 -63360-143 ENGINEERING PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63080-122 b3090-123 -63140-124 -69000-145 ~- CITY/COUNTY CODE COMP. PLAN COPY FEES OTHER .. J Name: Y.vw..a L ,,L: Address: ~~ j ~7 ~~/ !/ ct cneclc aw ` 1 `l" 1~ Copies received: _c SUBTOTAL ~~ ~ TOTAL ~~ Phone: ~~~ ~ ~--~ Project: J, ~ '~ .J S7 /~ / ~ ~///r'/;Si lih'A/ Date: ~ - Cam- Z._. Mof Hours: ~~~~~~ ~ ~ County of Pitkin State of Colorado The undo follows: I, } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY } ss. POSTING OF A VARIANCE HEARING } BEFORE THE PITRIN COIINTY BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT being first duly sworn, deposes and says as being or an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign day of was posted and visible continuously from the eLjfc~`'/ , 19 ~7/ , to the ' r~- day of f ~' l Gtr~ 197/ . (Must be posted for at least nine (9) full days before he hearing /d to . plicant's Signa ture Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~oZ day of ~ , 19~, by .~'RN ~ S L . Gl.t t2 T LS WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My Commission expires: Not y Public' Si atu Addre oooolo ~- REBUILT WILLIAMS CABIN ooona.~ REBUILT WILLIAMS CABIN #342730 C>3/ 1~9~ i. 1 : <5 Fiec ~. QO BFI: 672 FTC` 296 Si ]. via Davis, F'itV:.in Cnty Clerk, Doc $.frq RESOLUTION OF THE PITRIN COUNTY, COLORADO HOARD OF ADJUSTMENT GRANTING HEIGHT RELIEF FOR SNOWMAHH LLAMAS 6 ALPACAS FARM RESOLUTION NO. 92-13 WHEREAS, James and Diane Otis, Jr., doing business as Snowmass Llamas & Alpacas Farm, owners of a tract of land situated at 1150 Capitol Creek Road, requests a 7'6" height variance, where 12 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an existing structure; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado (as described in Exhibit "A", attached); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substan- tial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that a 7'6" height variance be granted, due to pre-existing conditions. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. 00001? #34,^_f3i~ 19/92 11:25 Rec ~.Op BK: ~ FG 297 Si 7. via Davis, F'itk:in Cnty Cler4::, Doc $.ixi Resolution No. 92-1 3 Page 2 The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: March 3, 1992 The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado ATTEST: Cin L. Christensen, Secretary Evan Gull, Acting Chairman 000013 #342f3U i~3/19/92 ].1:2v Fiec ~.ci~J B{:r 672 F'G 298 Si 1. via Davis, F•itF::in Cnty Clerk, Doc ~.i~c"~ EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description for property owned by James & Diane Otis, Jr. dba Snowmass Llamas & Alpacas Farm 1150 Capitol Creek Road Pitkin County, Colorado 000014 #3~+2r'3U 03/19/92 11:25 fie .tip E#' 672 F'G 299 Silvia Davi _,, PitF:in Cnty~erF::. Dnr- !G i,n i, ~~ nn o ~ ~i- a ~ ~ X U '` r r~ 9 C 2+ 3 ~ ~ ~J ~ U C3 c U~ a d ti Q ~a ~ _ ~~~8~ e ~ ~ i' ~pp ~.f u-3~ g R ~ -Y £ _ 3 ~ y C~ 4 X~ ~ ~_ C 0 X T aL~y^ 3~ ~.I A ~~$ ~ ~: 3 000(1?. i Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment March 3, 1992 Members Present: Evan Gull, Acting Chairman Stan Mathis Members Absent: Rick Neiley John Wheeler Ted Guy Rod Dyer Staff: Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Enforcement Gull opened the meeting at 5:20 p.m. and introduced the Board to those present. Patricia and Houghton Trott were present to request approval for a 19 foot north side yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district; and a 1'8" height variance, where 12 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an existing garage. Patricia Trott stated that they want to legalize this nonconforming structure before they sell the property. They had bought this property without knowing that the garage was built within the setbacks, was over the height limitation, and was built without a permit. There was no public comment. The lot size is 5.3 acres and would match an AF-2 zone. After further discussion, Wheeler moved to grant a 19 foot north side yard setback variance and a 1'8" height variance, per the plans submitted, due to practical difficulties not of the owner's making. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion passed. Jim Curtis was present to represent Peter Ziegler to request a 1'9" height variance, where 12 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an addition to an existing structure. Curtis briefed the Board on the Ziegler's request. This is an existing caretaker unit. The Board of County Commissioners revised the code amendment on employee dwelling units that allow for bigger 1 Q~O~~~ 7 units. Ziegler wants to add approximately 550 square feet to the rear of the 1500 square foot existing structure. The ridge is 15'10" and the height variance would enable the Ziegler's to tie into the existing structure. There was no public comment. After further discussion, Guy made a motion to grant a 1'9" height variance, due to practical difficulties, as per the plans submitted. wheeler seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion passed. Case #92-12. Raaflaub. John "Hans". Tract 2. Prince Creek Village John "Hans" Raaflaub was present to request a 78 foot front yard setback variance and an li foot west side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 50 feet, respectively, are required in the RS- 30 zone district, for construction of a proposed single-family residence. Raaflaub briefed the Board that there is about 5-1/2 acres on this lot. The building envelope was created by a 1041 Hazard Review that was granted in December 1991. Gull stated that this would be a downzoning issue as the setbacks are for a 30 acre lot and this is only 5-1/2 acres. Guy asked if there were any specific subdivision covenants that the homeowners had to abide by and Raaflaub stated that he was unaware of any. Guy asked if where the building envelope is shown was the only flat spot on the lot and Raaflaub stated that it was. Gull passed around the photographs submitted in the file. Gull read two letters into the record submitted by adjacent property homeowners, Mrs. Evelyn Bowers and Mr. Charles G. Plimpton, III, objecting to the request being made. = Guy stated that he believed a site visit was necessary on this case and would like to see the minutes on the 1041 hazard review. The memo on the 1041 review will be brought to the site visit. Guy moved to continue this case at a site visit to on Monday, March 9, 1992, at 8:30 a.m., at Tract 2, Prince Creek Village Tracts. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. Case #92-13, Snowmass Llamas & Alpacas, 1150 Cabitol Creek Road Jim Curtis was present representing James and Diane Otis, owners of Snowmass Llamas & Alpacas, requesting a 7'6" height variance, where 12 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an existing structure. Curtis stated that under the new employee dwelling unit provision that was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, the Otis' 2 000017 received permission from the BOCC to legalize and deed restrict an existing structure as an employee dwelling unit. This existing structure is 7'6" higher than what the Code allows. The structure will not be changed. There was no public comment. After further discussion, Guy moved to grant a 7'6" height variance, due to pre-existing conditions. Wheeler seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion passed. Chuck Roth was present to request a 70 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a recreational cabin which will be approximately 550 square feet. Roth stated that they received a minor 1041 hazard review approval from the Planning Office. This 1041 review was for floodplain purposes. Roth stated that the topography is not steep, but there are alot of trees around the area. There was no public comment. Gull read the letter submitted by Thomas Kuekes, Acting District Ranger for the Forest Service, into the record objecting to Roth's request. Mathis asked Roth if the Forest Service was notified when the minor 1041 hazard review was done. There was a minor 1041 hazard review done on this property and Mary Lackner, County Planner, found that the building envelope and driveway were not in any 1041 areas of concern. The only referral was with the County Attorney who checked for merger. After further discussion, Guy made a motion to grant a 70 foot front yard setback variance, due to nonconforming lot size, and per the plans submitted. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion passed. William Baker was present to request approval for a 60 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, and a 116 foot Highway 82 setback variance, where 200 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for construction of a proposed addition to a single-family residence and construction of a proposed detached garage. Baker stated that this was a model home that was built to try and sell log homes. This is approximately a 1-1/3 acre lot and Baker stated that they would comply with Holland Hills covenants. 3 0001° Guy stated that one of the Board's duties is to grant the minimum variance needed and believes there are other options for the proposed garage. There was no public comment. Guy stated that the Board should do a site visit after Raaflaub's and also have Schaffner show the Board the other Highway 82 setback approvals for the Holland Hill area. Guy moved to table Case X92-15 to Monday, March 9, 1992, at 10:00 a.m., at Lot 10, Holland Hills. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. Case #92-16, Kanan, Ronald. L2 B4 F2 Gateway to Snowmass SJD Ronald Kanan was present to request a 25 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district for construction of a driveway. Kanan stated that he has the Homeowner's Association approval on his request. Schaffner informed the Board that the access which was approved is not the one that is shown on the submitted plans. The change in access now locates the house within the required front yard setback. The present access was put in without a permit and is the one which the Homeowner's would like (per Kanan). Gull stated that this would be a downzoning issue and would have no problem granting what has been requested. Guy stated that he agrees with Schaffner in that Kanan put in a temporary access without a permit hoping that a permanent access could be made out of it. Kanan wanted the record to state that he feels that Guy has objections because of Kanan's and Guy's prior associations. Guy stated that he believed Kanan has done a good job and was unaware there were any problems. Guy stated that he would vote against the variance request because of how Kanan went around the process. Mathis stated that he agrees with Gull in theory, but it is hard for him to get around the issue of how the access came about. It was mentioned that Kanan has the option to table until the next meeting when more Board members might be present to discuss the access/variance issue. Guy stated that he can't vote for the request because Kanan went around the process and if he would vote for the request, then anyone could submit plans, build what they want, and then come in ask for a variance. 4 OODU1~ • Kanan stated that the existing access was excavated as a temporary "construction" access. Schaffner explained to the Board that an access permit is issued prior to issuance of a building permit, so that access to the lot can be obtained. Guy suggested that the case be tabled to April 7 when other members of the Board are present and Kanan could have a better chance at getting approval, if this would not stop the construction progress. Mathis suggested to Kanan to table this case until April 7 and bring a letter from the Homeowner's Association (or have a member present) stating their reasons for the preferred access. After further discussion, Mathis moved to table Case #92-16 to the April 7 meeting, with construction to continue until the access issue can be resolved. Guy seconded the motion and all were in favor. ****************************************************************** There will be a special presentation for Kandi Shaffran at the April 7, 1992 meeting. Chairperson will also be elected at the April 7 meeting. The minutes of the February 4, 1992, meeting were approved as written. The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, .~e~-- Cindy L. Christensen, Secretary 5 Evan Gull, Acting hairman nQ PEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICF ~ 730 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303)920-5090 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES city 00113 -63250-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL -63270-136 GMP/FINAL -- -63280-137 SUB/CONCEPTUAL -- -63300-139 SUB/FINAL -63310-140 ALL 2 STEP APPLICATIONS -63320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ -----~---~ CONSENTAGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: e, 00126 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00116 -63340-163 -----_ ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL k County 00113 -63160-126 GMP/GENERAL -63170-127 GMP/DETAILED ~'- - -63160128 GMP/FINAL -- -63190-129 SUB/GENERAL -63200-130 SUB/DETAILED ~- -63210-131 SUB/FINAL ~-- -63220 132 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS -63230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ~~ -63450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00113 -63360-143 ENGINEERING -- PLANNING OF FICE SALES 00113 -63080-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE -63090-123 COMP PLAN ------~ -63140-124 COPY FEES ~~- -69000-145 OTHER ~-- SUBTOTAL --~ TOTAL 'Name' __ ...._... Phone: ~ s l." ' ~ ~ Address: /'.' j / /,-, _ -._. --- - ; Project: - ~ ~" ' ~ , ,. ~.. ~ ~ Check # ~ { ~ f i . „ ^, ~ - _ . Date: - ~ ~ ;Copies received: nn oOlJo #of Hours. ~