The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.92.15 PITICIN COIINTY BOARD OF ADJ[7STMENT DATE FE C3 . ` t l99 Z CASE # ~4 r _ _ APPLICANT _w1l.A_IA M l"E. ~ E2lKA EiA 1CE'P PHONE C1Z'1- 8A9~3 MAILING ADDRESS OQ7Q (-}~LL~4Tlf) {-(tLLS Q~~A~A't T~ Cam, OWNER SAYVIE Pry P.~gp~/~ PHONE MAILING ADDRESS ~AM~z f~r~ ,4t30\/F LOCATION OF PROPERTY -_I-OT ~ IO HULtAtJ.fJ ~l~-l.. < ~ ~A~a~ -~ -~„ -aS~ «I isbt~l trl ~~,n.~-ry Cc~ Any pertinent data must accompany this application, an will be made part of this Case. The Board may return t "s a i ation if it does not contain all the facts in e Applicant Signatu -------- - ----------------------------- (To be completed by the Zoning Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: -~ Zone District Requesting: L33'4c•Lot Size ~~ Front Yard Setback Variance, where ~' is required. ' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Height Variance, where ' is required. Square Feet where a maximum of sq. ft. is allowed. i ~~ .y, Other: ~~~/f']~uv~L,1!1/.7 -P-.~ tl.~.ir~ x,F+~ Hardship: Zoning Official~~~xx~ /1r ~~. o~-~ Application filed o?/~,"' ~ D- /~ Date `3 -~ - / ~ ] \ Notices mailed) ~~ "1 -~~ ~2 Parcel ID # ~ `7(07" ~~~ ~~"DQ3Secretary f~ vtu~ Resolution to Building when Completed ~ _ Yes ~ _ ~ No 000001 ~' Z-~ ~' i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers, City Hall, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: Owner: Name and Address of Applicant: - Property Location or Description: March 3, 1992 at 5:15 p.m. City Hall, 1st Floor Council Chambers William & Erika Baker William & Erika Baker 0028 Holland Hills Road Basalt, CO 81621 Lot 10, Holland Hills Requesting approval for a 60 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district; and a 116 foot Highway 82 setback variance, where 200 feet is required, for construction of a proposed addition to a single-family residence. Approval of this variance would allow the structure to be 40 feet from the Baker's front yard property line and 84 feet from the Highway 82 right-of-way. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COIILD BE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X TH PITKIN COUNT~ARD OF ADJUSTMENT Cind Christensen, Secretary O~! lfl~ s i February 10, 1992 Pitkin County Board of Adjustment c/o Pitkin County Planning office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Lot Line setback Variance Application Lot 10, Holland Hills Subdivision Ladies and Gentlemen, Bill and Erika Baker 28 Holland Hills Road Basalt, CO 81621 303-927-8098 This application concerns a 390 sq. ft. addition to an existing residence at 28 Holland Hills Road. The addition is the first of a two phase project which will eventually involve a greenhouse and two car detached garage. County regulations require that a hardship be demonstrated for variance approval. As you may know, all of the lots in the Holland Hills Subdivision were rendered "sub standard" lots in the AF1 zone district by the early 1970's county down zoning. The underlying AF1 zone imposes minimum l0 acre lot line setbacks on lots which average 1 acre in our subdivision. In many cases AF1 setback lines overlap. Very little if any building is possible in Holland Hills without Board of Adjustment review. Under AF1 zoning no construction of any sort would be allowed on most of the lots in this subdivision. In addition our existing home lies within the required 200 ft. setback from Highway 82. The only way which we can utilize or improve on our property is through the variance procedure. Your thoughtful consideration and approval of our variance request would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Sincerel ,G%~ .2%G~~ Bill Baker 00003 ~. G'aP/E5 • • GbZB f/ULLA/1/D /%/C1S t2D. ~~1 fl~c.cfs~4 Diu s ~Po ~ISALZ ea ~/~2~ -- ,~ o m~ 7i2 ~sgeT eo. 81~~r MR. liiD .t~Gy,2tNL ~P~7c! ~ ~ri~ rz A[A!L/E C.:NRrST(A~! ~Ec,c.QvY~S~i/P CX~r ~7 hbcu~,~o ~«s ~Po F~~I.~LT ~l~slr'~2/ :,. r ~ r .~ ~.xNa~T A LEC~A1_ OESGR\PTION _~.r.O_T____.1_O_______L-~U_L~.AND -~IL.L.S SuBD\vlSION aT_ Bi~SA~LT s- OOOU05 w,, I' IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (This rs not a property Survey) Lot 10 Holland Hills at basalt Subdivision Pitkin county, Colorado <No street address posted) 1+ NOTES 1. The basis of control for this Improve-meat Location Certificate are the found property munun~F~nts shown as• control on the attached sketch. 2. Title Insurance Policy No. 400579 - C2 from First. American Title Insurance Company was relied on by Surveyor for additional information about rights-of-way and easements on this property in addition to the Subdivision Plat.. 3. There are restrictions and conditions on 'his property as ^~ ~ listed in the" instPvments recorded~~ in~the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder in Book 189 at page 63, Book 187 at page 94, Book 230 at page 94, Br_~ok 247 at pages 132, Book 240 at page 487, Book 262 at page 'L59, Plat Souk 4 at page 252, Book 323 at page 205, Book 398 at page 576. 4. The Subdivision Plat For Holland Hills at Basalt Subdivision is filed in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and recorder in Plat Book 4 at page 252. 5. Dimensions For the property k~oundary are from the Subdivision Plat. 6. It is Surveyors opinion there is an error on the Subdivision Plat for the curve length on the Lot boundary. A boundary survey using remaining original Subdivision monumentation would be needed to accurately determine the curve length. 7. The Subdivision Plat of Holland Hills at Basalt shows an Access Easement along the northeasterly boundary oC this property. Surveyor rs unable to determtnz the width of this Easement as no width is indicated on the Sub~iivisron Plat.. 8. Utility lor_ations other than those shown are unknown t.o Surveyor. 9. This property is located on the PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO AND INCORPORATED AREAS, National Flood Insurancz Program, FIRM, Flood Insurance Rate Map dated .rune 4, 1987, Community-Panel number 08097 C 0052 C. The property is within the Zone X, or in the area outside the 500-year flood plat,-,. IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this improvement location cert.ifrr_ate was prepared for Erika W. and William H. Balser, that it is ru:,t. a land survey or improvement survey plat, and that. iJ. is not to be relied upon for the establishment of fence, building, or other improvement lines. I further certify tl-,at the improvements on the described parca_1 on this date, February 5, 199'1., except utility connections, are entirely within thz boundaries of the parcel, except as shown, that there are no encroachments upon the described premises by improvements on any adjoining premises, er:cept as indicated, and that there is no apparent evidence or sign of any easemznt crossing or burdening__any part of said parcel, zxc~=;-~t as noted. _.-__. r_~ ~~ ~ ~ Louis FI. Buettner LS 13166 ~c^"-''~~'.. ,. ,,, .; ,,: ~ ~; ~ y F„~ ~~~ ?,. ~" 1 ,` ~°: ' ----- -------- - -- ---- ~f-- --------- -- ' ~ .r Dake c ~ r~ r, -rr' 1 i 4i J p.. 1. ~' ;\ e V e ~ rc; . III ,f ' :.ry UUiIL .. s IT-0i`RGVriMSPiT LOGAT7:'il ., h:?2T l.r'I ;^.T~ V ao 3 W V Y rp K ~p "° n rz (Ttii" is not ~ Frn-+~r~~y "urvav~ ^fo ad9re r., r~^-t e~i ] ~T 10 HOLLAND HILL5 at SA SALT SUBDIVISION n aW U J UQ FZ x~ a . JI- LLWO 6 i~rc ,2 r ~6 ~~ ~O its, ~~ V ~9 ~VV VL y~~I G~SY O`~91V ~~ V ~vM-do-iN~ia a~eviavn W J a U N a cM W ~ 6 Y F arch VaJ .f I J ~' O asu pW 2 ~'~ ~z0 OOrc LL 3 6 y ~ ~ ^i~,,.,~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~-F L ~_ Z v r 1 k r n I< b 7 ~Q h~ ~~. H a ! ~rtt~ ------ ~~ ~' i w`[q{ !Z0 ~~ ~I' ~,i~J 1 1Q ~w p °~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ 8 g =~ zV j ~ ~ Qa n~ ~O?~ ~-n iH pN'd ~'~OH rb j0 z i'> _; oc ~~ 9 Z ~' e -~ o J = Q ~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~I ~! Y', S ,- p~ , :, W ~ `~ ~ ~. .1 Z: a' ~~nU~~ U1 'j v ~ `---~ gJ ` 1SPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE'"'' - ~ ~ = 130 South Galena Street ~~ ~-Aspan,.Cobrado 81617 _ - - (303) 920-5090 - .LAND USE APPLICATION FEES 00113 ~ -63250-734 ~- .GMP/CONCEPTUAL .,. .-63270-136 ' -63280-137 ' ~ -63300-139 63310-140 ' ~ 63320-741 REFERRAL FEES 00125 63340-205 00123 63340-190 00175 63340-163 County GMP/FINAL SUB!CONCEPTUAL SUB/FINAL ALL 2STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 7-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL 00113 63160-126 GMP/GENERAL 63170-127 GMP/DETAILED 63180-128 GMP/FINAL -63790-129 SUB/GENERAL 63200-730 SUB/DETAILED 63210-131 SUB/FINAL 63220-132 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS 63230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 63450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REFERRAL FEES: 00125 63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 63340-790 HOUSING 00113 63360-743 ENGINEERING PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 63080-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE 63090-723 COMP. PLAN 63140-124 COPY FEES 69000-745 OTHER SUBTOTAL TOTAL ~ ~ ~ ~~'= /ie:~ ~J~ ~~ ~ ~'~ J d j / Name: Phone: Address: ~ ; : .% --a'~?~ /~G~ a /'. ' ;, Project: ~ ~-'--• %~ ~~J 3 3 Z Check# !: ~' ~~_ ~ Date: ~~ ~O - Copies received : #of Hou rs: ~n~~~ ., County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY } ss. POSTING OF A V~ANCE HEARING State of Colorado } BEFORE THE PITRIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: I , W l ~-L-- ~.~~ ~ , ~KG~-. being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the Z3 day of ~EOQUAQ.~/ 19~_, to the day of MAc.L~, , 19~. (Must be posted for at least nine (9) full days before the hearing date) . ,~ /~ /lo / /~ Appli~a3xE's Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this .3 day of ~1L.clh.C.~ , 19 92 , by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~3 3 ~ My Commission expires: N6'tary Public's Signature :• 0l0 ~~ ~ Address ~/~ OOt~O~~:r „~a xc~a¢a 3.~x,sF..c~ s3ti~riao S~ K atiZ 53b7[O~Od'O LCJ I ~ifi x 3.K i S 53b 0 i ~. 0 0 0 0 i• • • - - T-~ i ~ ~ ,~ ~; ~ ~~ I I I ~I I~ it ~I ~i ~I ~ , I ~i ~~ i i' I , I 1 ~ - + ~ ~_ I L L I ~~ s 1 I I i I l l j _ _~ Q ml ,~ o~ "~ ~'l W C'r!. O C Q c~ 0 0 ---- ~-- , 1 I ~i i ~i it ~I ~ -~- ~-, ', ~~~ - ~ I I ~. i I ~ i i ~- - I v \`i • 1 ------- T._.__~--- --~ -- ,~~,ZI ------~__.. ._ ~-. I• I! - -' - -, i i i r i i i i w 0 0 0 0 M( ~~ ~7 • i t~ ~ t~ ~: ~~ '~ #342732 ..3/19/9 11:x; Rec 4.O~i ~tf..'672 F'G 304 Silvia Davis, F'it4::in Cnty Cler4::, Doc ~.~~ci RESOLIITZON OF TBE PZTRIN CODNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT GRANTING SETBACK RELIEF FOR WILLIAM & ERZRA BARER RESOLIITION NO. 92-15 WHEREAS, William & Erika Baker, owners of a tract of land situated at Lot 10, Holland Hills, requests a 60 foot front yard setback variance where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, and a 166 foot Highway 82 setback variance, where 200 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for construction of a proposed addition to a single-family residence and a proposed detached garage; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado (as described in Exhibit "A", attached); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substan- tial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that a 70 foot front yard setback variance and a 100 foot Highway 82 setback variance be granted due to•nonconforming lot size, as per the plans submitted (Exhibit "B"). I WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may • result in rehearing and possible revocation. ~~0~~~ r • #34<<3^. G3/: 9~ 11:2i Rec s.i~p Bk' 672 _ 305 Silvia Davis, F'it4::in Cnty Clerk, Doc ~.Up Resolution No. 92- /S Page 2 The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: March 9, 1992 The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado ATTEST: Cindy L. Christensen, ecretary Evan Gull, Acting Chairman ~~QQ~.? 9 coP~es r • • #34~73~ 93f 19/9? 11 : <7 Fec ~. ~~~~ $~' 672 F'G 307 Silvia Davis, F'itk:in Cnty Clerk:, Doc $.0~? ~XH~31T ~~A LEGAL DESCR\PTION tt _1._.QT__~_O=___NC21~LAtVDILLS Su~D\V \ S\ON aT Bf~SAI_-C' _ _ __- 00001 x _ , ' k34<73~ ~ 9/9C 11 : ~ f Fec ~. Uc? E+k: 6T ~G 308 Silvia Dav.s, Fit4::in Cnty Clerk, Doc 5.00 II1T'ROVSMBHT LOG1TIiH '': = 2T 1;'I^. ^~Tc (T11.+ is not ~ PTO'~nTtY °urvPV) >lo addre^^ ^o^.ted ] OT 10 xvM -do-iHOia 3ieviarn f' ~~~~a. Lj~~i ~i fl ~~~~ W J u N 1~ 1=~ Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment SITE VISIT March 9, 1992 Members Present: Evan Gull, Acting Chairman John Wheeler Stan Mathis Ted Guy Members Absent: Rick Neiley Rod Dyer Staff: Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Enforcement Gull opened the meeting at 8:45 a.m. Case X92-12. Raaflaub. John_!'Hans", Tract 2, Prince Creek Village John "Hans" Raaflaub was present to request a 78 foot front yard setback variance and an 11 foot west side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 50 feet, respectively, are required in the RS- 30 zone district, for construction of a proposed single-family residence. Neighbors present were Evelyn Bowers and Dale Pace, President of the Prince Creek Village Homeowner's Association. Gull reviewed the Minor 1041 Hazard Review memo. Raaflaub showed the Board the stakes where the building envelope was established. Pace stated that the subdivision does not have any covenants and they abide by Pitkin County's regulations. Pace also stated that other homeowners within the subdivision have had to get Board of Adjustment approval for side yard setbacks as all the lots are nonconforming... Wheeler asked Raaflaub how high the proposed house will be and Raaflaub stated that it will be two stories high. The proposed house with the garage will be approximately 2300 square feet. Raaflaub showed the Board where the leechfield will be on the property and stated that he has to maintain a certain distance from the leechfield per health regulations. Pace stated that his major concern was with scarring of the hillside and Raaflaub stated that he has no intentions of digging into the hillside. After further discussion, Guy moved to grant a 70 foot front yard setback variance and a 20 foot west side yard setback variance, due to a nonconforming lot size and topographical hardship. Wheeler seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion passed. QD~U~d T ~ The Board then traveled to the next case. Gull called this case, to order at 10:00 a.m. William Baker was present to request approval for a 60 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, and a 116 foot Highway 82 setback variance, where 200 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for construction of a proposed addition to a single-family residence and construction of a proposed detached garage. Baker showed the Board the location of the stakes. Schaffner informed the Board of other Highway 82 setbacks granted to other Holland Hill property owners. This showed the largest setback granted was a 100 foot setback from Highway 82. Guy stated that he would not have a problem granting a 100 foot setback, but that 116 was getting too close to Highway 82 and would be a greater encroachment than that of the existing home. If granted, this would increase the front yard setback variance to 70 feet. After further discussion, Guy moved to grant a 100 foot Highway 82 setback and a 70 foot front yard setback variance, due to nonconforming lot size. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion passed. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Cindy Christensen, Secretary Evan Gull, Acting Chairman 2 ~~~~~~ ~ ~ • Minutes Pitkin County Hoard of Adjustment March 3, 1992 Members Present: Evan Gull, Acting Chairman John Wheeler Stan Mathis Ted Guy Members Absent: Rick Neiley Rod Dyer Staff: Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Enforcement Gull opened the meeting at 5:20 p.m. and introduced the Board to those present. Patricia and Houghton Trott were present to request approval for a 19 foot north side yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district; and a 1'8" height variance, where 12 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an existing garage. Patricia Trott stated that they want to legalize this nonconforming structure before they sell the property. They had bought this property without knowing that the garage was built within the setbacks, was over the height limitation, and was built without a permit. There was no public comment. The lot size is 5.3 acres and would match an AF-2 zone. After further discussion, Wheeler moved to grant a 19 foot north side yard setback variance and a 1'8" height variance, per the plans submitted, due to practical difficulties not of the owner's making. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion passed. Jim Curtis was present to represent Peter Ziegler to request a 1'9" height variance, where 12 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an addition to an existing structure. Curtis briefed the Board on the Ziegler's request. This is an existing caretaker unit. The Board of County Commissioners revised the code amendment on employee dwelling units that allow for bigger 1 0~~~2~ units. Ziegler wants to add approximately 550 square feet to the rear of the 1500 square foot existing structure. The ridge is 15'10" and the height variance would enable the Ziegler's to tie into the existing structure. There was no public comment. After further discussion, Guy made a motion to grant a 1'9" height variance, due to practical difficulties, as per the plans submitted. Wheeler seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion passed. Case #92 12 Raaflaub John "Hans" Tract 2 Prince c:reex village John "Hans" Raaflaub was present to request a 78 foot front yard setback variance and an 11 foot west side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 50 feet, respectively, are required in the RS- 30 zone district, for construction of a proposed single-family residence. Raaflaub briefed the Board that there is about 5-1/2 acres on this lot. The building envelope was created by a 1041 Hazard Review that was granted in December 1991. Gull stated that this would be a downzoning issue as the setbacks are for a 30 acre lot and this is only 5-1/2 acres. Guy asked if there were any specific subdivision covenants that the homeowners had to abide by and Raaflaub stated that he was unaware of any. Guy asked if where the building envelope is shown was the only flat spot on the lot and Raaflaub stated that it was. Gull passed around the photographs submitted in the file. Gull read two letters into the record submitted by adjacent property homeowners, Mrs. Evelyn Bowers and Mr. Charles G. Plimpton, III, objecting to the request being made. Guy stated that he believed a site visit was necessary on this case and would like to see the minutes on the 1041 hazard review. The memo on the 1041 review will be brought to the site visit. Guy moved to continue this case at a site visit to on Monday, March 9, 1992, at 8:30 a.m., at Tract 2, Prince Creek Village Tracts. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. Jim Curtis was present representing James and Diane Otis, owners of Snowmass Llamas & Alpacas, requesting a 7'6" height variance, where 12 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an existing structure. Curtis stated that under the new employee dwelling unit provision that was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, the Otis' 2 ~~~Qn~ received permission from the BOCC to legalize and deed restrict an existing structure as an employee dwelling unit. This existing structure is 7'6" higher than what the Code allows. The structure will not be changed. There was no public comment. After further discussion, Guy moved to grant a 7'6" height variance, due to pre-existing conditions. Wheeler seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion passed. Chuck Roth was present to request a 70 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a recreational cabin which will be approximately 550 square feet. Roth stated that they received a minor 1041 hazard review approval from the Planning Office. This 1041 review was for floodplain purposes. Roth stated that the topography is not steep, but there are alot of trees around the area. There was no public comment. Gull read the letter submitted by Thomas Kuekes, Acting District Ranger for the Forest Service, into the record objecting to Roth's request. Mathis asked Roth if the Forest Service was notified when the minor 1041 hazard review was done. There was a minor 1041 hazard review done on this property and Mary Lackner, County Planner, found that the building envelope and driveway were not in any 1041 areas of concern. The only referral was with the County Attorney who checked for merger. After further discussion, Guy made a motion to grant a 70 foot front yard setback variance, due to nonconforming lot size, and per the plans submitted. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion passed. Case #92-15. Baker. William & Erika. Lot 10 Holland Hills William Baker was present to request approval for a 60 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, and a 116 foot Highway 82 setback variance, where 200 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for construction of a proposed addition to a single-family residence and construction of a proposed detached garage. Baker stated that this was a model home that was built to try and sell log homes. This is approximately a 1-1/3 acre lot and Baker stated that they would comply with Holland Hills covenants. 3 Qfl!l~?~~ Guy stated that one of the Board's duties is to grant the minimum variance needed and believes there are other options for the proposed garage. There was no public comment. Guy stated that the Board should do a site visit after Raaflaub's and also have Schaffner show the Board the other Highway 82 setback approvals for the Holland Hill area. Guy moved to table Case X92-15 to Monday, March 9, 1992, at 10:00 a.m., at Lot 10, Holland Hills. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. 1•ase SyL-la nanan xVnalu LL Dtl r<. ~aa a.cwar vv ~~~ Ronald Kanan was present to request a 25 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district for construction of a driveway. Kanan stated that he has the Homeowner's Association approval on his request. Schaffner informed the Board that the access which was approved is not the one that is shown on the submitted plans. The change in access now locates the house within the required front yard setback. The present access was put in without a permit and is the one which the Homeowner's would like (per Kanan). Gull stated that this would be a downzoning issue and would have no problem granting what has been requested. Guy stated that he agrees with Schaffner in that Kanan put in a temporary access without a permit hoping that a permanent access could be made out of it. Kanan wanted the record to state that he feels that Guy has objections because of Kanan's and Guy's prior associations. Guy stated that he believed Kanan has done a good job and was unaware there were any problems. Guy stated that he would vote against the variance request because of how Kanan went around the process. Mathis stated that he agrees with Gull in theory, but it is hard for him to get around the issue of how the access came about. It was mentioned that Kanan has the option to table until the next meeting when more Board members might be present to discuss the access/variance issue. Guy stated that he can't vote for the request because Kanan went around the process and if he would vote for the request, then anyone could submit plans, build what they want, and then come in ask for a variance. 4 Q~~U~el Kanan stated that the existing access was excavated as a temporary "construction" access. Schaffner explained to the Board that an access permit is issued prior to issuance of a building permit, so that access to the lot can be obtained. Guy suggested that the case be tabled to April 7 when other members of the Board are present and Kanan could have a better chance at getting approval, if this would not stop the construction progress. Mathis suggested to Kanan to table this case until April 7 and bring a letter from the Homeowner's Association (or have a member present) stating their reasons for the preferred access. After further discussion, Mathis moved to table Case #92-16 to the April 7 meeting, with construction to continue until the access issue can be resolved. Guy seconded the motion and a.ll were in favor. ****************************************************************** There will be a special presentation for Kandi Shaffran at the April 7, 1992 meeting. Chairperson will also be elected at the April 7 meeting. The minutes of the February 4, 1992, meeting were approved as written. The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lt ~.__ Cindy L. Christensen, Secretary Evan Gull, Acting hairman 5 ~QnOLU ~SPEN/PIT KIN PLANNING OFFIC 130 South Galena Street ~' Aspen, Colorado 81611 LAND USE (303) 920-5090 C1ty APPLICATION FEES 00113 125 00115 ` Iounty 00113 X0126 00129 oolfa -63250-134 -63270-136 GMP/CONCEPTUAL -63280-137 GMP/FINAL -63300-139 SUB/CONCEPTUAL ~"` ~ -63310-140 """~„--.-... SU&FINAL -63320-141 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS _~v ALL 1-STEP APP LICATIONS/ CONSENTgGENDA ITEMS _-~~` REFERRAL FEES ~`~'' ~' . -63340-205 -63340-190 ENVIRONMENTAL ~~-~y HEALTH -63340-163 HOUSING ~ ENGINEERING -~ ~ . susroraL -63160-126 -63170-127 -63180-128 -63190-129 -63200-130 -63210-131 -63220-132 -63230-133 -63450-146 REFERRAL FEES: -63340-205 -63340-190 -63360-143 '' pCAhgHING OFFICE SALES :`~,_OOtil'3 -63080-122 -63090-123 ' -63140-124 -69000.145 AOtiress: ~ J ~_ , . GMP/GENERAL GMP/DErq ILED GMP/FINAL SUB/GENERgL SUB/DETAILED SUB/FINAL ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 1-STEP gppLICgTIONS CONSENTAGENDq ITEMS BOAgp Op ADJUSTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL {{EALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING CITY/COUNTY CODE COMP. pI.AN COPY FEES OTHER CheGc# '_ ~~~Sreceived: SUBTOTAL - TOTgL ~~ Phone ~ ~~ 1 "~ ~ ~~ Project: .~PJrc'I (<ec.._ .~J J Date: ~- /~) '>,t ~ofHours