The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.92.23 PITRIN COIINTY BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT 0 DATE APPLICANT liJ1Y 1~ ~ ~C~i~Y I MAILING ADDRESS ~~~C, [~~~~ `(~•~ OWNER ~ MAILING ADDRESS f LOCATION OF PROPERTY CASE ~ //__ ` ~/HOC-7~ PHONE W ~9 ~/ I ~a` (~ PHONE (~ Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may return this application if it does not contain all the facts in question. Applicant Signature (TO be completed by the Zoninq Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: S R Zone District Requesting: .1~va1c. 7~ Lot Size 1~.: ler 15 ked ' Front Yard Setback Variance, where 30 ' is required. ' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ~_' is required. Side Yard Setback Variance, where /C7 ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Height Variance, where ' is required. Square Feet where a maximum of sq. ft. is allowed. Other: Zooning Official ~ ~ Application filed .~ / -~~-- Parce SID No. 1i~3 - dG - DD -~/ 9 Date of Meeting Notices Mailed Secretary Refer Resolution to Building Department ; _ ; Yes ~ _~ No 000001 c~Z6 a,~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers, City Hall, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: Owner: Name and Address of Applicant: Property Location or Description: June 2, 1992 at 5:15 p.m. 1st Floor Council Chambers, City Hall Aspen Village; Cathy J. Kerr Cathy J. Kerr P.O. Box 8787 La Jolla, CA 92038 Aspen Village, Lot #131 Requesting approval for a 15 foot front yard setback variance and a 7 foot rear yard setback variance where 30 feet and 10 feet, respectively, are required for placement of a mobile home; and a 6 foot rear yard setback variance and an 8 foot side yard setback variance where 10 feet and 10 feet, respectively, are required in the SR zone district for construction of a proposed shed. Approval of this variance would locate the trailer 15 feet from the front yard property line and 3 feet from the rear yard property line; and the shed 4 feet from the rear yard property line and 2 feet from the side yard property line. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUEBTED COULD SE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X 000002 THE ITKIN~~OARD OF ADJUSTMENT Cind L. Christensen, Secretary ~, ~i III ~ d • (I~ ~~"~c~d `~ c~i~ "5 ~ Y~ ~r ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I~1 ~11it,~ ~YD ~~G( V1'~D~jl ~ ~~_ ~~ ~~P (,l~lG~x`~ u~ ~°~ ~oic, r ~ ~1' cw~ ~~g~~ ~~,i~ah~~\~w~^~ ~~W'U~~~ • ~ V I Titles ~~ l V 1 C,(,UG~ i v~, ~1~t.~ !' ~~ Q1z~ a ~Yo~d ~ 5'~5` ,'. ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ', i ~~ III r i j ~ C~~' J r Y~./ 1 /~J~j\ ~C 1 l../ I ~~ III db0003 • • P~C ~ ro~xk~,~ au~~s v~~k~e.. ~~;~,~, ~~ a~~ ~, 8~~~ ~~C ~ 131 ~s ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~v c~~~I~,Co. ~~c~~5 __w.._. ~...~~~ ~.yhib~ ~ ~ ,, ~~~5 ~~' T 19'i~: ~- ~Z' -~ rte"` T ~~~31' a3~lz y -~~ ~~ ~~ Y~v~' - cl~t~V2W~ T 5f~ ~o~ec~ rNob~t?~ hosti-~e. ~---- I (~' --~ ~'^ ~-~ ~~iY1 VI ~~~, ~0~ ~ ~?J~ ~ 01 ~~ c~l~'f0~ ~ 5G~ X ~ ~r 00000 28~ ~ c~,^~~ ~ ~~~. a,~r c~~ , ;~,e' ~~~ 3h~e~--vr~rr l~-C~t~ ~o -{D ~~d -ku~n Y'~~ ~o -l o Gr~~~ ~ h ~ i, 16C ~' 1'~~ o n 12~t', p~p~a ~oaaa~afl oa~o Box 7001, Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 923-4337 May 28, 1992 Aspen Pitkin Planning Office Joanna Schaffner 506 E. Main Aspen, CO. 8161 1 Re: Space X131 New Mobile Home Dear Joanna Schaffner: JUN ~ Aspen Village is aware and approves of the new mobile home which is planned for space ~ 131 at Aspen Village Mobile Home Park. The old unit is 12 X 60 and the new unit is 16 X 56. The new mobile home is wider, but not as long as the old unit, so the new unit will fit on the current space with plenty of area around. Space's 131 is located on the back row which was originally designed as a double wide lot. Since the new mobile home is only single wide, there will be plenty of room. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Patricia Dickerson Manager- Aspen Village OUQO~? ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFI("' t30 South Galena Street ~. Aspen, Colorado 87617 .. . (303). 920.5090 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES cny 00113 --63250-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL -63270-136 GMP/FINAL -63280-137 SUB/CONCEPTUAL -63300-139 _ SU&FINAL -63310-140 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS X3320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125' -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00115 -63340-163 ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL County 00113 -63160-126 GMP/GENERAL -631 70-7 27 GMP/DETAILED -63180-128 GMP/FINAL -63190-129 SUB/GENERAL -63200-130 SUB/DETAILED -63210-131 SUB/FINAL X3220-132 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS -63230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS {3450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00113 X3360-143 ENGINEERING PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63080-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE b3090-123 COMP. PLAN =63140-124 COPY FEES -69000-145 OTHER Name: ! ' /) ~~~ ~JC 'I( / Address:. ~~` ~: I ~7~ Check # / J ,' -1 Copies received: SUBTOTAL :~ -"~` TOTAL ~- Phone: f~ {"~~ /s ~ {"~~(% JJ t ' 1, `I .+ Date: _> - '?° l ~ ODUUU7 County of'Pitkin State of Colorado The undersigned, follows: I, being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY } ss. POSTING OF A VARIANCE HEARING } BEFORE THE PITKIN COIINTY BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT being first duly sworn, deposes and says as 1l d~~~before the fearing date). \Applicant's Signature ) ' [~~/) r i Subscribed and sworn to before me ,' ~ this 1 JT^ day of ~t~ - - - 19~ ~ by ,J __ K~+M Vh o ~t5~. Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this .matter in a conspicuous place on the subject 3 X .1, property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the day of _ I ~ Io~V 19~_, to the day of ~,~P~P~n-~ 19~. (Must be posted for WITNESS MY HAND A1~TD OFFICIAL SEAL. My Commission expires• a 6 ~~~ '~ a Notary Public's Signature ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ . ~ 5'isi3 ~f~t __ Address ~.. ,. t1,U U,~''t~'! ~~ . . ~ :7 ~ ~ e`; .i ~.? ... . .^t: ~., ~. - ~~',~ _ r. '~ - y ,~~ , ~ ,~ ..: -~~~#: tf 3 ~~~~~ ~r.r' • ~k ~iVM~ ~ .,... Y J 1 ~* ,' .tip, [rt r `f ±'~~ i~.t ' • f S', ~ i. • ~~~ , r. is ~ ~ ~~~. #347391 ~?8/~:•= 09:48 Fec $.UO BK 685 i•384 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.Or~ REBOLIITION OF TEE PITRIN COIINTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJIIBTMENT GRANTING SETBACK RELIEF FOR ASPEN VILLAGE (LOT X131) RESOLIITZON NO. 92-23 WHEREAS, Aspen Village resident Cathy Kerr, owner of a mobile home located at Aspen Village, Lot 131, is requesting a 15 foot front yard setback variance and a 7 foot rear yard setback variance, where 30 feet and 10 feet, respectively, are required for placement of a mobile home; and a 6 foot rear yard setback variance and an 8 foot side yard setback variance, where 10 feet and 10 feet, respectively, are required for construction of a proposed shed; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado (as described in Exhibit "A", attached); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. . 3. Granting such relief will not cause substan- tial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that a 15 foot front yard setback variance and a 7 foot rear yard setback variance, be granted for placement of a mobile home; and a 6 foot rear yard setback variance and a 5 foot side yard setback variance, ~ be granted for construction of a proposed shed, due to downzoning, pursuant to the plans submitted (Exhibit "B"). WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. ~0~~?0 #347381 OB/04~ 09:48 Rec $.Oi~ $h' 685 P~S Silvia Davis, tkin Cnty Clerk, Doc ~.OO Resolution No. 92- 3 Page 2 The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: June 2, 1992 ATTEST: t~- Cind L. C ristensen, Secretary The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado Ted Guy, Acting Chai Q~~~11 f #347381 OS/0~ • 09:48 kec $.00 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, BK 685 F Doc $.OU EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description for property owned by ASPEN VILLAGE, INC. (Cathy Kerr) Lot 131 Aspen Village Pitkin County, Colorado j it Q~~~~? 4- -- ..... _ ~ ...: ------- _ t--~Y \~~~ ~ #347381 n£ ~F/92 09:48 Ftec $. OCR Silvia Davis, Fitkin Cnty Clerk, ~~' v- ~• T 5(0 2fi' ~l11dGtUL r ~ E --~'D ~~ T i~ ~iZ E-- IZ' ~ Y 5'~ di~~ T ~ y ryt;sway E- i to --~ ~~ V~~I~ l o~ ~'~~- ap~to,~ , ~~?~y~ ~~YJ~ . 6000 3 ~~.. r Bk 68:~ 387 -^~ Doc x.40 h~~\ ~ .. ~s~ 1~ ~o~ed mob~lz how-~2. ~ «~- --~ fir. ~~ed (ofi ~ I~~ 5G' X~Sr `„ ` ~~~ _ ~~ ~~ (Y10 ~ l(L ~(`GYY~ ~~_ ~ ~; D~~eL~tUt`~~ ,, ~+n~~X ~`~~,1 ~..~ ~ta~~r'~:. mow.{. ~--. ~-~~ ~ee~-Ivt'~ ~efi.ti' ~o ~a ~-~d -1v~r~ Y'~h't" ~o -4-a cX~`~i ~ h 16C ~ tx~~ o ~~ 4e~'C'. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITICIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the District Courtroom, Pitkin County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Boazd of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appeaz and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particulazly if you have objectron to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. A VARIANCE GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN THAT REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. DATE AND T1ME OF MEETING: Tuesday, June 2, 1992; 5:15 P.M. 1st Floor Council Chambers, City Hall Aspen Village/Kerr, Cathy: requesting approval fora 15' front yard setback variance and a 7' reaz yard setback variance where 30' and 10', respectively, aze required in the SR zone district for placement of a mobile home; and a 6' reaz yazd setback variance and an 8' side yazd setback variance where 10' and 10', respectively, are required in the SR zone district for construction of a shed. Property Location: Aspen Village, Lot #131. Boyd, Constance (Heatherbed Lodge): requesting approval fora 30' front yazd setback variance, where 75 feet is required in the AR-1 zone distnct, for construction of a barn; and a 15' front yazd setback variance, where 75 feet is required in the AR-1 zone district for construction of an employee dwelling unit. Property Location: 1679 Maroon Creek Road. Lackey, Mary Ellen: requesting a 12' height variance, where 12' is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an existing ranch gate. Property Location: White Staz Ranch, Lot #5. Cretti, Clark: requesting a 2' front yard setback variance and a 6' north side yard setback variance, where 30' and 15', respectively, are required in the R-30 zone district, for construction of an attached gazage. Property Location: Redstone Subdivision, Lot #13. Calaway, Connie & Jim: requesting a 70' front yard setback variance, a 10' rear yazd setback variance, and a 15' west side yard setback variance, where 100', 30' and 30', respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of asingle-family residence. Property Location: Crystal River Park Subdivision, Lots 9A and 10A. Glick Family Trust; requesting approval fora 150 square foot increase in floor azea where a maximum of 3,118 square feet is permitted for this lot in the R-30 zone district, to cover an entry. Approval of this variance would allow the existing structure to exceed allowable floor area by 150 square feet. Property Location: Lot 8, Block 2, Filing 1, Meadowood Subdivision (75 Bluebonnet Trail). Submitted to the Aspen Times on May 19, 1992. To Be Published in the Aspen Times May 22, 1992. County PO # 000014 Minutes Pitkin'County Board of Adjustment Jung 2, 1992 Members Present: Members Absent: Staff: Ted Guy, Acting Chair Evan Gull John Wheeler Rod Dyer Mike Cooper Rick Neiley Stan Mathis Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Enforcement Guy opened the meeting at 5:20 p.m. and introduced the Board to those present. Guy read a letter into the record from Cindy L. Merrill, Secretary to Andrew V. Hecht, who is representing the Glick Family, requesting that this case be tabled to the July 7, 1992'meeting. Dyer moved to table Case ,$`92-31 to July 7, 1992, Wheeler seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Case #92-23, Asoen Village (Kerr) Aspen Villaae Lot No 131 Jama Parker was present, representing Cathy Kerr, to request a 15 foot front yard setback variance and a 7 foot rear yard setback variance, where 30 feet and 10 feet, respectively are required for placement of a mobile home; and a 6 foot rear yard setback variance and an 8 foot side yard setback variance, where 10 feet and 10 feet, respectively, are required for construction of a proposed shed. Guy read into the record the letter from Patrician Dickerson, Manager of Aspen Village, that they are aware of the request being made and approve of this request. Guy asked Schaffner if this met the standards as far as the Code for mobile home parks, and the request does meet these standards. It was mentioned that this is a double-wide lot. There was no public comment. Wheeler asked why the shed had to be so close to the property line and asked if it could be moved closer to the mobile home. After further discussion, it was agreed that a 5 foot variance would be more acceptable than 8 feet, which would leave 7 feet between the shed and the trailer (instead of 11 feet). 1 000015 .. Dyer made a motion to grant a 15 foot front yard setback variance and a 7 foot rear yard setback variance, for placement of a mobile home; and a 6 foot rear yard setback variance and an 5 foot side yard setback variance, for construction of a proposed shed, due to downzoning. Wheeler seconded the motion and all were in favor. Case x#92 26 Bovd Constance (Heatherbed Lodge) 1679 Maroon Creek oad Guy stated for the record that he has done work previously at Heatherbed Lodge, but is not currently doing work on this property and believes that there is no conflict. Jim Curtis was present to represent Constance Boyd. Boyd is requesting a 30 foot front yard setback variance, where 75 feet is required in the AR-1 zone district, for construction of a barn; and a 15 foot front yard setback variance, where 75 feet is required for construction of an employee dwelling.unit. - Curtis briefed the Board on the history of the lodge and the layout of the land. Heatherbed Lodge has already received approval from the Board of County Commissioners for an employee/manager/owner dwelling unit and an accessory barn. Curtis stated that there is an existing structure where the dwelling unit is proposed to be built. The new structure will be incorporating some of this existing structure. The intent of the setback variance is essentially to allow both structures to be up against the hillside, further away from the floodplain, and minimize the visibility from Maroon Creek Road. There was no public comment. After further discussion, Gull made a motion to grant a 30 foot front yard setback variance for construction of a proposed barn, and a 15 foot front yard setback variance for construction of an employee dwelling unit, due to topographical hardship and pursuant to the plans submitted. Dyer seconded the motion and all were in favor . Case 92-27 Lacke Mar Ellen Lot 5 White Star Ranch Guy turned the Chair over to Dyer as he was the architect of the remodel on the Lackey property, and stepped down from this case. Mary Ellen Lackey and Gary Combs were present to request a 5 foot height variance, where 12 feet is the maximum permitted for accessory structures per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an existing ranch gate. Schaffner stated that at the time of posting, Lackey was requesting a 12 foot height variance for an addition of a pagoda to the top of the existing ranch gate. The applicant has dropped the pagoda from the plans and is only asking for a variance for the existing ranch gate (which is presently 17 feet high). 2 ~~UU~6 The ranch gate has been in existence for over one year and does conform to the setback requirements. Dyer asked what the Planning Office's view was on ranch gates. Schaffner stated that the Board of County Commissioners are not willing to support a change in regulation or policy to allow for ranch gates in the County. Zoning believes that if they are kept out of the setback, they need a height variance because the accessory height limit of 12 feet conflicts with the Fire Department requirement of 14 to 15 feet for their emergency vehicles. Combs stated that the gate was indicated on the approved building plans. There is a•letter from White Star Ranch Homeowners' Association. giving their approval for the existing gate only. Gull stated that he finds it difficult to oppose what are clearly privileges that have existed and have been granted, especially since this existing ranch gate is outside the setbacks. Wheeler stated that if this had come before the Board before being built, that he would have denied the request. Guy stated that since he is not voting on this case, to get an approval, it would have to be unanimous. Guy asked Lackey if she wanted to table this request to the July 7 meeting and she stated she would. Gull moved to table Case 92-27 to July 7. It was seconded and all were in favor. Case #92-29. Cretti Clark Lot 13 Redstone Subdivision Clark Cretti was present to request a 2 foot front yard setback variance, and a 6 foot north side yard setback variance, where 30 feet and 15 feet, respectively, are required in the R-30 zone district for construction of an attached garage. Cretti stated that the Redstone Historical Society granted approval for this request. on their recommendation, Cretti moved the proposed structure back two feet. Schaffner stated that the applicant is going through a minor 1041 hazard review and that the Planning Office sees no problem with the variance request. Cretti stated that the proposed garage will be back into the hillside where there has already been some excavation. This is to be a two-story structure. There was no public comment. 3 QD~U1~ After further discussion, Wheeler moved to grant a 2 foot front yard setback variance, and a 6 ~~foot Wort ursuant yto theeplans variance, due to topographical hardship and p submitted. Gull seconded the motion and all were in favor. YGLn ouan..i. ., .,.. Connie Calaway was present to request a 70 0o ro variance, a l0 foot rear yard setback variance and a 15 foot west side yard setback variance, where 100 feet, 30 feet and 30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a proposed single-family residence. Calaway stated that there is a change in the request. The adjoining neighbors, the Bostrons, at Lot 8A, asked Calaway if she would move the proposed residence to 40 feet from the lot line. The Bostrons have agreed to honor the same agreement .from their side of the adjacent lot line. Therefore, a west side `yard setback variance is no longer being requested. Wheeler stated that this is a clear case of downzoning. There was no public comment on this case. After further discussion, Gull moved to grant a 70 foot front yard setback variance, and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance, due to downzoning, as shown on the revised plans submitted. Cooper seconded the motion and all were in favor. Snowmass Mesa 5uclaivi5~~+„ Steve Smart was present to request approval for a 45 foot rear yar setback variance, where 50 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district, for construction of a proposed single-family residence. Smart stated that a 40 foot rear yard setback variance was already approved on February 4, 1992, but that the footprint of the house has been changed. The elevations and the footing of the building have been changed due to cost. Guy read the February 4 minutes into the record. Wheeler stated that with the reconfiguration of the house, he felt this was too close to the property line. Whereas a corner of the house was close to the property line in the first request, the whole facade of the house would be 5 feet from the property line per the present request. Smart stated that the owner of Lot 4, who would be most affected, the proposedheresidencehbackr further,ggas tree hmightnhave too lbe removed. 4 ~Q~~Z~ ~. After further discussion, most members had difficulty supporting a 45 foot rear yard setback variance, but would support a 40 foot rear yard setback variance. Gull moved to grant a 40 foot rear yard setback variance, where 50 feet is required, due to downzoning and topographical hardship. Cooper seconded the motion and all were in favor with wheeler voting no. Motion passed. ******************************,t******************************~***** The May 5 minutes were approved as written. The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Cindy Chri tensen, Secretary ed Guy, Acting Chai 5 0000?9 .ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFI ~ 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81617 (303) 920-5090 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES city 00113 -63250-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL -63270-136 GMP/FINAL -63280-137 SUB/CONCEPTUAL -- -63300-139 SUB/FINAL -63310-140 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS -- -63320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENTAGENDAITEMS -- REFERRAL FEES 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 ' -63340-190 HOUSING ~ 00115 -63340-163 ENGINEERING -- SUBTOTAL County -- 00113 -63160-126 GMP/GENERAL -63170-127 GMP/DETAILED -63180-128 GMP/FINAL -63190-129 SUB/GENERAL E3200-130 SUB/DETAILED -63210-131 SUB/FINAL -- -63220-132 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS 113230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS -_ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ~--- -63450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ~-- REFERRAL FEES: 00125 00 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00113 -63360-143 ENGINEERING -- PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63080-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE X3090-123 COMP. PLAN -- -63140-124 COPY FEES -- -69000-145 OTHER SUBTOTAL ~-- j TOTAL ~-- r ~ Phone: - ~ ' Address: - j -~ / / ~ ~,_ u Check # ~ j .' '~ Copies received: n l l ~ ~~ ~~ Date: ? n #otHours: